Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Now an index
Changed line(s) 47 (click to see context) from:
* [[UsefulNotes/YagyuJubei Yagyu Munenori]] ranks up there along with Amakusa and Nobunaga in terms of being vilified in Japan. In general, he is an excellent swordsman as well as a shrewd politician. However, he's also a guy who dedicated his life and sword to protect others, he even wrote a book titled "Life-Giving Sword" to further boost that. Since politicians are often turned into AcceptableTargets and his son Mitsuyoshi is often romanticized as someone who disdains politics, Munenori is often turned into an antagonistic evil swordsman AND SleazyPolitician that was the cause of Mitsuyoshi losing an eye or also portrayed as an EvilCounterpart to UsefulNotes/MiyamotoMusashi, another romanticized MasterSwordsman (the two never met). This is an often widespread trope usage on Munenori. Kind of hard being a politician and a father of a folk hero who's thought to be anti-politics (even if Mitsuyoshi eventually returned to political stage after being kicked out).
to:
* [[UsefulNotes/YagyuJubei Yagyu Munenori]] ranks up there along with Amakusa and Nobunaga in terms of being vilified in Japan. In general, he is an excellent swordsman as well as a shrewd politician. However, he's also a guy who dedicated his life and sword to protect others, he even wrote a book titled "Life-Giving Sword" to further boost that. Since politicians are often turned into AcceptableTargets mocked and his son Mitsuyoshi is often romanticized as someone who disdains politics, Munenori is often turned into an antagonistic evil swordsman AND SleazyPolitician that was the cause of Mitsuyoshi losing an eye or also portrayed as an EvilCounterpart to UsefulNotes/MiyamotoMusashi, another romanticized MasterSwordsman (the two never met). This is an often widespread trope usage on Munenori. Kind of hard being a politician and a father of a folk hero who's thought to be anti-politics (even if Mitsuyoshi eventually returned to political stage after being kicked out).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Removing ROCEJ wick.
Changed line(s) 84 (click to see context) from:
* One that overlaps with HistoricalHeroUpgrade (of someone else) and AHeroToHisHometown: in America, UsefulNotes/HarrySTruman is viewed generically positively for the most part. In ''Russia'', on the other hand, he is given the whole blame for starting the Cold War even now, decades after it ended. It’s true that Stalin had wanted to keep the alliance after World War II and Truman was dead-set against it, but giving him the whole blame ignores [[PeoplesRepublicOfTyranny the reason why]] he didn’t trust Stalin. [[Administrivia/RuleOfCautiousEditingJudgment And that’s all that will be said.]]
to:
* One that overlaps with HistoricalHeroUpgrade (of someone else) and AHeroToHisHometown: in America, UsefulNotes/HarrySTruman is viewed generically positively for the most part. In ''Russia'', on the other hand, he is given the whole blame for starting the Cold War even now, decades after it ended. It’s true that Stalin had wanted to keep the alliance after World War II and Truman was dead-set against it, but giving him the whole blame ignores [[PeoplesRepublicOfTyranny the reason why]] he didn’t trust Stalin. [[Administrivia/RuleOfCautiousEditingJudgment And that’s all that will be said.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Trope rename
Changed line(s) 71 (click to see context) from:
* For a given definition of "historical", prehistoric animals often get this in media that features them. The most common ones are ''Tyrannosaurus rex'', [[RaptorAttack raptors,]] [[PteroSoarer pterosaurs,]] and (thanks to [[Film/JurassicParkIII a certain movie]]) ''Spinosaurus''. See PrehistoricMonster for further details.
to:
* For a given definition of "historical", prehistoric animals often get this in media that features them. The most common ones are ''Tyrannosaurus rex'', [[RaptorAttack raptors,]] [[PteroSoarer pterosaurs,]] raptors]], pterosaurs, and (thanks to [[Film/JurassicParkIII a certain movie]]) ''Spinosaurus''. See PrehistoricMonster for further details.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Up To Eleven is a defunct trope
Changed line(s) 72 (click to see context) from:
** ''T. rex'' and ''Spinosaurus'' are usually depicted as "Ultimate Killing Machines". While T. rex was certainly a formidable predator, its ferocity is usually exaggerated to unrealistic levels of aggression and ravenousness (like hunting humans for no apparent reason or attacking any other dinosaurs on sight). ''Spinosaurus'' meanwhile is often hyped up as the super-''T. rex'' (i.e. the above but UpToEleven) when in reality it was mainly a fish-eater that preferred to spend its time near water.
to:
** ''T. rex'' and ''Spinosaurus'' are usually depicted as "Ultimate Killing Machines". While T. rex was certainly a formidable predator, its ferocity is usually exaggerated to unrealistic levels of aggression and ravenousness (like hunting humans for no apparent reason or attacking any other dinosaurs on sight). ''Spinosaurus'' meanwhile is often hyped up as the super-''T. rex'' (i.e. the above but UpToEleven) up to eleven) when in reality it was mainly a fish-eater that preferred to spend its time near water.
Changed line(s) 78 (click to see context) from:
* UsefulNotes/JosephMcCarthy has few defenders today, and even the most stringent anti-communists generally dislike him. However, he frequently gets MisBlamed for excesses of the era that he had nothing to do with, such as the House Un-American Activities Committee (he was a senator) and UsefulNotes/TheHollywoodBlacklist. [=McCarthy=] is often thought of as the originator of militant anti-communism in the American government during the Second RedScare, but the means he used didn't originate with him -- he merely took them UpToEleven. While [=McCarthy=] was certainly damaging in many ways, he was the one who fueled up the fire, not the one who started it.
to:
* UsefulNotes/JosephMcCarthy has few defenders today, and even the most stringent anti-communists generally dislike him. However, he frequently gets MisBlamed for excesses of the era that he had nothing to do with, such as the House Un-American Activities Committee (he was a senator) and UsefulNotes/TheHollywoodBlacklist. [=McCarthy=] is often thought of as the originator of militant anti-communism in the American government during the Second RedScare, but the means he used didn't originate with him -- he merely took them UpToEleven.up to eleven. While [=McCarthy=] was certainly damaging in many ways, he was the one who fueled up the fire, not the one who started it.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 14 (click to see context) from:
* China's first emperor UsefulNotes/QinShiHuangdi gets this a lot, owing to his historical reputation as a brutal tyrant ([[RepressiveButEfficient albeit an effective one]]). He's the BigBad in ''Literature/BridgeOfBirds'', in which he is also immortal and has magic powers. His {{Expy}} in ''VideoGame/WorldOfWarcraft'', Emperor Lei Shen, fares no better, given [[ShockAndAwe demonic lightning powers]] and [[ANaziByAnyOtherName Nazi-style racial theories]] to make him look more evil. Additionally, the Emperor in the film ''Film/{{Hero}}'' is based on him, and is sort of an uneasy mix between this trope and HistoricalHeroUpgrade- he wins, and many thought the film had the odd lesson of "an imperfect government is better than civil war."
to:
* China's first emperor UsefulNotes/QinShiHuangdi gets this a lot, owing to his historical reputation as a brutal tyrant ([[RepressiveButEfficient albeit an effective one]]). He's the BigBad in ''Literature/BridgeOfBirds'', in which he is also immortal and has magic powers. His {{Expy}} in ''VideoGame/WorldOfWarcraft'', Emperor Lei Shen, fares no better, given [[ShockAndAwe demonic lightning powers]] and [[ANaziByAnyOtherName Nazi-style racial theories]] to make him look more evil. Additionally, the Emperor in the film ''Film/{{Hero}}'' ''Film/Hero2002'' is based on him, and is sort of an uneasy mix between this trope and HistoricalHeroUpgrade- he wins, and many thought the film had the odd lesson of "an imperfect government is better than civil war."
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Direct link
Changed line(s) 29 (click to see context) from:
* There are several conspiracy theories surrounding the {{Illuminati}}, who are often portrayed as a group trying to take over the world and create a Big Brother-style {{dystopia}}. However, in their time (end of the 18th century, not before, not later), they weren't too different from your regular BrotherhoodOfFunnyHats. Their New World Order was in fact referring to a republican government and laws based on fundamental human rights (think of the French Revolution). Indeed, this is how the conspiracy theories on them got started: in 1798 a royalist wrote a book blaming the French Revolution on Freemasons and the Illuminati, which then grew steadily over the years.
to:
* There are several conspiracy theories surrounding the {{Illuminati}}, TheIlluminati, who are often portrayed as a group trying to take over the world and create a Big Brother-style {{dystopia}}. However, in their time (end of the 18th century, not before, not later), they weren't too different from your regular BrotherhoodOfFunnyHats. Their New World Order was in fact referring to a republican government and laws based on fundamental human rights (think of the French Revolution). Indeed, this is how the conspiracy theories on them got started: in 1798 a royalist wrote a book blaming the French Revolution on Freemasons and the Illuminati, which then grew steadily over the years.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Not So Different is a disambiguation now, removing misuse
Changed line(s) 86 (click to see context) from:
* It is extremely common for far-left and anti-American circles to do this to the entirety of American history, portraying the Founding Fathers as violent slaveowners seeking to preserve slavery and commit mass genocide on Native Americans who only rebelled against Britain because the crown would not allow them to do either of these things and whose ideology of Manifest Destiny directly inspired the Nazis, while portraying WWII-era America as doing almost nothing to stop the Nazis when the Soviet Union was doing all the hard work, and even [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Paperclip recruited Nazis post-war to gain an advantage over the Soviets]]. While many of the Founders were slaveowners, Britain only abolished slavery in the 1830s, and it is entirely possible had the revolution not occured, the slaveowners in the Caribbean and the North American South could have formed a power bloc to deter abolitionist efforts in the forseeable future. Britain and it's colonies were [[NotSoDifferent no more benevolent]] towards indigenous peoples as well, if their treatment of Canadian and Australian natives were any indication. Furthermore, with regards to the inspiration Manifest Destiny had on Nazism, Hitler was not solely inspired by American Manifest Destiny, but was also inspired by British Imperialism, [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Herero_and_Namaqua_genocide#Link_between_the_Herero_genocide_and_the_Holocaust the genocides committed by the German Empire in Nambia]], and the Armenian genocide. With regards to World War II, while it was true that the Soviets played the bigger role in defeating the Nazis in Europe, America played a important role in facilitating their victory through Lend-Lease. The Americans were also not the only country to recruit Nazis post-war in preparations for the Cold War, the Soviets themselves also [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Osoaviakhim used Nazi scientists]] to strengthen it's own rocket program.
to:
* It is extremely common for far-left and anti-American circles to do this to the entirety of American history, portraying the Founding Fathers as violent slaveowners seeking to preserve slavery and commit mass genocide on Native Americans who only rebelled against Britain because the crown would not allow them to do either of these things and whose ideology of Manifest Destiny directly inspired the Nazis, while portraying WWII-era America as doing almost nothing to stop the Nazis when the Soviet Union was doing all the hard work, and even [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Paperclip recruited Nazis post-war to gain an advantage over the Soviets]]. While many of the Founders were slaveowners, Britain only abolished slavery in the 1830s, and it is entirely possible had the revolution not occured, the slaveowners in the Caribbean and the North American South could have formed a power bloc to deter abolitionist efforts in the forseeable future. Britain and it's colonies were [[NotSoDifferent no more benevolent]] benevolent towards indigenous peoples as well, if their treatment of Canadian and Australian natives were any indication. Furthermore, with regards to the inspiration Manifest Destiny had on Nazism, Hitler was not solely inspired by American Manifest Destiny, but was also inspired by British Imperialism, [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Herero_and_Namaqua_genocide#Link_between_the_Herero_genocide_and_the_Holocaust the genocides committed by the German Empire in Nambia]], and the Armenian genocide. With regards to World War II, while it was true that the Soviets played the bigger role in defeating the Nazis in Europe, America played a important role in facilitating their victory through Lend-Lease. The Americans were also not the only country to recruit Nazis post-war in preparations for the Cold War, the Soviets themselves also [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Osoaviakhim used Nazi scientists]] to strengthen it's own rocket program.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 53 (click to see context) from:
* Government {{corrupt|Politician}}ion tends to [[NeverLiveItDown reflect badly on the person who headed the affected government at the time]], even if [[MisBlamed they were more honest than their subordinates]]. In the US, for example, the administrations of UsefulNotes/UlyssesSGrant and UsefulNotes/WarrenHarding set then-new benchmarks for corruption and they were regularly ranked among the country's worst presidents for decades afterwards. Later, their (admittedly rather timid by modern standards) pro-civil rights stances would be rediscovered and applauded by a more receptive audience.
to:
* Government {{corrupt|Politician}}ion tends to [[NeverLiveItDown reflect badly on the person who headed the affected government at the time]], even if [[MisBlamed they were more honest than their subordinates]]. In the US, for example, the administrations of UsefulNotes/UlyssesSGrant and UsefulNotes/WarrenHarding UsefulNotes/WarrenGHarding set then-new benchmarks for corruption and they were regularly ranked among the country's worst presidents for decades afterwards. Later, their (admittedly rather timid by modern standards) pro-civil rights stances would be rediscovered and applauded by a more receptive audience.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Disambiguating; deleting and renaming wicks as appropriate
Changed line(s) 71 (click to see context) from:
* For a given definition of "historical", prehistoric animals often get this in media that features them. The most common ones are ''TyrannosaurusRex'', [[RaptorAttack raptors,]] [[PteroSoarer pterosaurs,]] and (thanks to [[Film/JurassicParkIII a certain movie]]) ''Spinosaurus''. See PrehistoricMonster for further details.
to:
* For a given definition of "historical", prehistoric animals often get this in media that features them. The most common ones are ''TyrannosaurusRex'', ''Tyrannosaurus rex'', [[RaptorAttack raptors,]] [[PteroSoarer pterosaurs,]] and (thanks to [[Film/JurassicParkIII a certain movie]]) ''Spinosaurus''. See PrehistoricMonster for further details.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* Edward Teach/Thatch, better known as UsefulNotes/{{Blackbeard}}, is commonly depicted as the most bloodthirsty and dreaded pirate of all time, when he's not being alleged to have had supernatural powers and/or borderline indestructibility to put Rasputin to shame. In reality, while Blackbeard was hardly a nice man, his reputation for brutality was significantly exaggerated both then and now. Basically, his whole image as a merciless killer was partly a brilliant display of bluffing that scared targeted ships' crews and town garrisons into surrendering without a fight, and partly tall tales told by other parties who had reasons of their own to make him out to be even worse than he actually was. Moreover, the idea that he was the "worst pirate ever" is objectively untrue, since there were many pirates who wrought more havoc than he ever did (though admittedly, this was usually because they had more resources they could bring to bear than Blackbeard did).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* UsefulNotes/ThomasEdison often gets this in works about UsefulNotes/NikolaTesla. While Edison did indeed have a {{Jerkass}} streak in RealLife, he is often given sole blame for Tesla's never getting some of his inventions out, even the ones that just didn't work (understanding of the laws of physics was much less complete in the late 19th and early 20th centuries than it is today, and some of the theories underlying Tesla's later failed inventions have since been proven incorrect) or that Tesla never actually intended to be used.[[note]]A good example of this is an episode of ''Series/TheBigBangTheory''. The boys hate being compared to Edison and prefer Tesla, seeing Tesla as a true scientist and Edison as just a guy [[GladIThoughtOfIt who took credit for other people's inventions]] and was [[GloryHound more concerned with being famous]] than actual science.[[/note]] Though it is true the pair did share an intense [[UnknownRival one-sided rivalry]] on Edison's part, who used his influence with the American business community to limit Tesla's opportunities, and slandered his alternating current, making Edison's direct current (a less efficient form) the standard model. At least until Edison's ''other'' rival George Westinghouse bought a license to Tesla's patent and gave alternating current the financial backing it needed to compete with Edison's direct current on the open market.
* The entire country of France gets depicted this way in the context of UsefulNotes/WorldWarII, with the CheeseEatingSurrenderMonkeys and FrenchJerk tropes being combined. Partly in reaction to the myriad stories of French ''maquis'' (resistance fighters) bravely defying the Germans, a "black legend" of sorts has arisen claiming that most French people not only didn't put up a fight, but actually ''welcomed'' the Germans and became Nazis themselves. The truth is somewhere in between: those relatively few French who did oppose the Nazis were at best passively resistant, but most French people, whether resistance fighters or not, were ''not'' happy about being occupied. The French Army was also forced to surrender because Paris had already been invaded and the Nazis threatened to blow the city up. Also, most of the French who cooperated with the fascist Vichy government during the war had held fascist beliefs to begin with, and were to some degree using the invasion as a pretext.
** The Vichy French Navy also stubbornly maintained the government's official neutrality, despite the government making that neutrality a sham and despite being directly attacked by the British. When the Nazis finally lost patience with this and tried to seize the Vichy ships, the entire fleet was scuttled.
* Older works about UsefulNotes/TheAmericanCivilWar and the Reconstruction Era, such as ''Film/{{The Birth of a Nation|1915}}'', do this to Representative Thaddeus Stevens as a matter of course. He'll be portrayed as a fanatical, vengeful villain obsessed with further punishing the poor, defeated South. What did he do that was so bad? Well, that was the truly heinous act of getting Congress to grant civil rights and suffrage to the newly-freed black people. [[SarcasmMode How could anyone do something so horrible?]] He was one of the few (even among abolitionists) who actually believed in racial equality, and was in a long-term relationship with his quadroon maid when both those things were condemned (and even considered criminal) by nearly everyone. Newer works, like Creator/StevenSpielberg[='s=] ''{{Film/Lincoln}}'', portray him much more positively and accurately.
* The entire country of France gets depicted this way in the context of UsefulNotes/WorldWarII, with the CheeseEatingSurrenderMonkeys and FrenchJerk tropes being combined. Partly in reaction to the myriad stories of French ''maquis'' (resistance fighters) bravely defying the Germans, a "black legend" of sorts has arisen claiming that most French people not only didn't put up a fight, but actually ''welcomed'' the Germans and became Nazis themselves. The truth is somewhere in between: those relatively few French who did oppose the Nazis were at best passively resistant, but most French people, whether resistance fighters or not, were ''not'' happy about being occupied. The French Army was also forced to surrender because Paris had already been invaded and the Nazis threatened to blow the city up. Also, most of the French who cooperated with the fascist Vichy government during the war had held fascist beliefs to begin with, and were to some degree using the invasion as a pretext.
** The Vichy French Navy also stubbornly maintained the government's official neutrality, despite the government making that neutrality a sham and despite being directly attacked by the British. When the Nazis finally lost patience with this and tried to seize the Vichy ships, the entire fleet was scuttled.
* Older works about UsefulNotes/TheAmericanCivilWar and the Reconstruction Era, such as ''Film/{{The Birth of a Nation|1915}}'', do this to Representative Thaddeus Stevens as a matter of course. He'll be portrayed as a fanatical, vengeful villain obsessed with further punishing the poor, defeated South. What did he do that was so bad? Well, that was the truly heinous act of getting Congress to grant civil rights and suffrage to the newly-freed black people. [[SarcasmMode How could anyone do something so horrible?]] He was one of the few (even among abolitionists) who actually believed in racial equality, and was in a long-term relationship with his quadroon maid when both those things were condemned (and even considered criminal) by nearly everyone. Newer works, like Creator/StevenSpielberg[='s=] ''{{Film/Lincoln}}'', portray him much more positively and accurately.
Added DiffLines:
* Creator/NiccoloMachiavelli was commonly given historical villain upgrades in late Renaissance works, including Shakespeare and Marlowe. In fact, his reputation was so bad that "Nick" may have become [[LouisCypher a name for the Devil]] because of him. DatedHistory has largely discredited this one, though. Almost any recent fictional portrayal of him is more sympathetic.
* Herod the Great (37-4 B.C.) of Judea might not have slaughtered all those babies in his mad quest to find the infant Jesus, which is recorded only in [[Literature/TheBible the Gospel of Matthew]] (though some historians suggest this is because having at most a dozen babies killed in one small town was considered too insignificant at the time to merit much attention). However, he did massacre members of his own family out of paranoia (one theory being that Herod was certifiably insane). Despite this, a growing number of Israelis are attempting to rehabilitate his reputation. In addition to benefiting from MyCountryRightOrWrong and NWordPrivileges (although Herod was of course a Roman puppet and racially only a half-Jew), these Israelis argue that Herod was probably the best possible ruler they could have had under the circumstances. Only an accommodationist like Herod would have been able to persuade the Romans to be as tolerant of the Jewish religion as they managed to be (in a compromise, Herod had to design a temple that included both Jewish and pagan iconography). Also, following the collapse of the Jewish kingdom after the reign of Solomon and especially after the Babylonian exile, Judea had not only declined in glory but had become a cultural backwater -- and Herod did all he could to modernize Judean society.
* Fiction has ''not'' been kind to Conrad of Montferrat, Crusader figure and ''de facto'' King of Jerusalem for two years. This is especially true in Anglophone media, partly because UsefulNotes/RichardTheLionheart and his chroniclers opposed Conrad's claim to the throne (though even fiction critical of Richard tends to villify Conrad), and partly due to [[ValuesDissonance anti-Italian sentiment.]]
* [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alexander_Leslie Sir Alexander Leslie]] is often said to be the source of the poem, [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/There_Was_a_Crooked_Man "There Was a Crooked Man."]] Said Crooked Man is depicted as being quite evil in [[Videogame/TheCrookedMan various]] [[VideoGame/TheWolfAmongUs media.]] What was so crooked about Sir Alexander Leslie? He negotiated peace between Scotland and England.
* For a given definition of "historical", prehistoric animals often get this in media that features them. The most common ones are ''TyrannosaurusRex'', [[RaptorAttack raptors,]] [[PteroSoarer pterosaurs,]] and (thanks to [[Film/JurassicParkIII a certain movie]]) ''Spinosaurus''. See PrehistoricMonster for further details.
** ''T. rex'' and ''Spinosaurus'' are usually depicted as "Ultimate Killing Machines". While T. rex was certainly a formidable predator, its ferocity is usually exaggerated to unrealistic levels of aggression and ravenousness (like hunting humans for no apparent reason or attacking any other dinosaurs on sight). ''Spinosaurus'' meanwhile is often hyped up as the super-''T. rex'' (i.e. the above but UpToEleven) when in reality it was mainly a fish-eater that preferred to spend its time near water.
** Raptors will often be depicted as {{Super Speed}}y, [[ItCanThink highly intelligent]] pack-hunters that can take down prey hundreds of times their size. While there were big raptors like ''Utahraptor'' and ''Dakotaraptor'' that could easily threaten a human if alive, the smaller ones like ''Deinonychus'' and ''Velociraptor'' were probably no more dangerous than dogs. They also weren't particularly fast or intelligent by modern standards (but still better than most dinosaurs). A fast human could outrun a raptor easily and most raptors were only as smart as rabbits. Finally, the only raptor that has been found with possible evidence for pack-hunting is ''Deinonychus'' - and there's still a lot of debate about whether it constitutes as evidence or not. [[GoofyFeatheredDinosaur They were also a lot more cuddly than fiction tends to depict them]]--more like a hawk than a crocodile.
** Pterosaurs are frequently depicted as eagle-like creatures that [[KidnappingBirdOfPrey pluck prey from the ground with their talons.]] In reality, many pterosaurs like ''Pteranodon'' and ''Rhamphorhynchus'' were strict fish-eaters. Also, all pterosaurs had fairly weak feet that weren't built for grasping, so none of them could have picked up a human even if they wanted to.
* UsefulNotes/AaronBurr has been the victim of this since his own time, for [[NeverLiveItDown killing the first American Treasury Secretary]] UsefulNotes/AlexanderHamilton. For this, he is often portrayed as a violent, bloodthirsty, and highly entitled jerkass. In real life, Burr was often described as being a rather nice person, up until about 1804, and he was quite literally generous to a fault, nearly bankrupting himself on multiple occasions and pawning his possessions to give money to those in need. One of the reasons why his duel with Hamilton shocked so many people was because, supposedly, Burr was usually so cheerful and easygoing.
* In popular culture, UsefulNotes/RamsesII is frequently depicted as the [[Literature/BookOfExodus Pharaoh of the Exodus]], more frequently than any other Pharaoh. Less commonly, he gets depicted as the Pharaoh of the Oppression. Scholarly consensus is that he was almost certainly ''not'' the Pharaoh of the Exodus (which is generally agreed upon to have happened earlier in the New Kingdom's history), and there's no evidence that an entire ethnic group was enslaved under his reign (so he almost certainly wasn't the Pharaoh of the Oppression either). Historical evidence says that, far from being a NephariousPharaoh, he was one of AncientEgypt's greatest rulers.
* Since the American War in Afghanistan began in 2001, it has become the fashion to depict the 1980s-era anti-Soviet Afghan guerrillas as some sort of proto-Taliban (more egregious examples will even call directly these guerrillas "the Taliban", ''even though the Taliban hadn't even been founded yet at that time''), showing them to be little more fanatical fundamentalist terrorists. In reality, the anti-Soviet guerrillas of the '80s were a politically diverse bunch that included democrats, Shia groups, and even Maoists. As a whole, they were much more moderate and far less violent than the Taliban. This is partly because the Taliban practice Pashtun nationalism, and are largely restricted to the south and east of the country, while the anti-Soviet front in the 1980s basically comprised the bulk of the country. There's a reason why the modern Afghan government and military, which is actively fighting the Taliban, is actually stock-full of veterans from anti-Soviet rebel groups.
* UsefulNotes/JosephMcCarthy has few defenders today, and even the most stringent anti-communists generally dislike him. However, he frequently gets MisBlamed for excesses of the era that he had nothing to do with, such as the House Un-American Activities Committee (he was a senator) and UsefulNotes/TheHollywoodBlacklist. [=McCarthy=] is often thought of as the originator of militant anti-communism in the American government during the Second RedScare, but the means he used didn't originate with him -- he merely took them UpToEleven. While [=McCarthy=] was certainly damaging in many ways, he was the one who fueled up the fire, not the one who started it.
* Ty Cobb had a reputation as a violent racist for many years. However, this unflattering image of Cobb was subsequently discovered to be largely the result of forgery and falsifications by his first biographer, sportswriter Al Stump. While Cobb did get into a few fights, his reputation for violence is heavily exaggerated, and he wasn't the only baseball player of the era who did so. Cobb was also a philanthropist who founded a hospital and an educational foundation. As for his alleged racism, he grew up in a family of abolitionists and was a major supporter of integrating baseball. While he really did attack a heckler who accused him of being half-black, he was angry about the [[YourMom implied insult against his mother]] rather than the allegation of him being mixed-race.
* [[UsefulNotes/PopeAlexanderVI Rodrigo Borgia]] is often depicted as the archetype of the [[SinisterMinister corrupt and evil churchman,]] and sometimes as a proto-mafia don. And he was corrupt. But the level of corruption he got up to was pretty much par for the course in his era. The reason he is remembered for his corruption when many of the corrupt notables of the age were arguably even worse was because of all the corrupt notables of the day, he was the only one to become Pope. As such, he looked much worse than he actually was because people held him to a higher standard.
** His children frequently get Historical Villain Upgrades as well. Cesare really ''was'' a pretty awful person (though ''VideoGame/AssassinsCreedBrotherhood'' may still be taking it too far with the supernatural conspiracy thing). On the other hand, Lucrezia, frequently portrayed as a catty and scheming poisoner, was probably nothing of the sort: there's no evidence for her poisoning anyone, and she made peace with her rivals and was well-loved in her territory of Ferrara.
* Herod the Great (37-4 B.C.) of Judea might not have slaughtered all those babies in his mad quest to find the infant Jesus, which is recorded only in [[Literature/TheBible the Gospel of Matthew]] (though some historians suggest this is because having at most a dozen babies killed in one small town was considered too insignificant at the time to merit much attention). However, he did massacre members of his own family out of paranoia (one theory being that Herod was certifiably insane). Despite this, a growing number of Israelis are attempting to rehabilitate his reputation. In addition to benefiting from MyCountryRightOrWrong and NWordPrivileges (although Herod was of course a Roman puppet and racially only a half-Jew), these Israelis argue that Herod was probably the best possible ruler they could have had under the circumstances. Only an accommodationist like Herod would have been able to persuade the Romans to be as tolerant of the Jewish religion as they managed to be (in a compromise, Herod had to design a temple that included both Jewish and pagan iconography). Also, following the collapse of the Jewish kingdom after the reign of Solomon and especially after the Babylonian exile, Judea had not only declined in glory but had become a cultural backwater -- and Herod did all he could to modernize Judean society.
* Fiction has ''not'' been kind to Conrad of Montferrat, Crusader figure and ''de facto'' King of Jerusalem for two years. This is especially true in Anglophone media, partly because UsefulNotes/RichardTheLionheart and his chroniclers opposed Conrad's claim to the throne (though even fiction critical of Richard tends to villify Conrad), and partly due to [[ValuesDissonance anti-Italian sentiment.]]
* [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alexander_Leslie Sir Alexander Leslie]] is often said to be the source of the poem, [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/There_Was_a_Crooked_Man "There Was a Crooked Man."]] Said Crooked Man is depicted as being quite evil in [[Videogame/TheCrookedMan various]] [[VideoGame/TheWolfAmongUs media.]] What was so crooked about Sir Alexander Leslie? He negotiated peace between Scotland and England.
* For a given definition of "historical", prehistoric animals often get this in media that features them. The most common ones are ''TyrannosaurusRex'', [[RaptorAttack raptors,]] [[PteroSoarer pterosaurs,]] and (thanks to [[Film/JurassicParkIII a certain movie]]) ''Spinosaurus''. See PrehistoricMonster for further details.
** ''T. rex'' and ''Spinosaurus'' are usually depicted as "Ultimate Killing Machines". While T. rex was certainly a formidable predator, its ferocity is usually exaggerated to unrealistic levels of aggression and ravenousness (like hunting humans for no apparent reason or attacking any other dinosaurs on sight). ''Spinosaurus'' meanwhile is often hyped up as the super-''T. rex'' (i.e. the above but UpToEleven) when in reality it was mainly a fish-eater that preferred to spend its time near water.
** Raptors will often be depicted as {{Super Speed}}y, [[ItCanThink highly intelligent]] pack-hunters that can take down prey hundreds of times their size. While there were big raptors like ''Utahraptor'' and ''Dakotaraptor'' that could easily threaten a human if alive, the smaller ones like ''Deinonychus'' and ''Velociraptor'' were probably no more dangerous than dogs. They also weren't particularly fast or intelligent by modern standards (but still better than most dinosaurs). A fast human could outrun a raptor easily and most raptors were only as smart as rabbits. Finally, the only raptor that has been found with possible evidence for pack-hunting is ''Deinonychus'' - and there's still a lot of debate about whether it constitutes as evidence or not. [[GoofyFeatheredDinosaur They were also a lot more cuddly than fiction tends to depict them]]--more like a hawk than a crocodile.
** Pterosaurs are frequently depicted as eagle-like creatures that [[KidnappingBirdOfPrey pluck prey from the ground with their talons.]] In reality, many pterosaurs like ''Pteranodon'' and ''Rhamphorhynchus'' were strict fish-eaters. Also, all pterosaurs had fairly weak feet that weren't built for grasping, so none of them could have picked up a human even if they wanted to.
* UsefulNotes/AaronBurr has been the victim of this since his own time, for [[NeverLiveItDown killing the first American Treasury Secretary]] UsefulNotes/AlexanderHamilton. For this, he is often portrayed as a violent, bloodthirsty, and highly entitled jerkass. In real life, Burr was often described as being a rather nice person, up until about 1804, and he was quite literally generous to a fault, nearly bankrupting himself on multiple occasions and pawning his possessions to give money to those in need. One of the reasons why his duel with Hamilton shocked so many people was because, supposedly, Burr was usually so cheerful and easygoing.
* In popular culture, UsefulNotes/RamsesII is frequently depicted as the [[Literature/BookOfExodus Pharaoh of the Exodus]], more frequently than any other Pharaoh. Less commonly, he gets depicted as the Pharaoh of the Oppression. Scholarly consensus is that he was almost certainly ''not'' the Pharaoh of the Exodus (which is generally agreed upon to have happened earlier in the New Kingdom's history), and there's no evidence that an entire ethnic group was enslaved under his reign (so he almost certainly wasn't the Pharaoh of the Oppression either). Historical evidence says that, far from being a NephariousPharaoh, he was one of AncientEgypt's greatest rulers.
* Since the American War in Afghanistan began in 2001, it has become the fashion to depict the 1980s-era anti-Soviet Afghan guerrillas as some sort of proto-Taliban (more egregious examples will even call directly these guerrillas "the Taliban", ''even though the Taliban hadn't even been founded yet at that time''), showing them to be little more fanatical fundamentalist terrorists. In reality, the anti-Soviet guerrillas of the '80s were a politically diverse bunch that included democrats, Shia groups, and even Maoists. As a whole, they were much more moderate and far less violent than the Taliban. This is partly because the Taliban practice Pashtun nationalism, and are largely restricted to the south and east of the country, while the anti-Soviet front in the 1980s basically comprised the bulk of the country. There's a reason why the modern Afghan government and military, which is actively fighting the Taliban, is actually stock-full of veterans from anti-Soviet rebel groups.
* UsefulNotes/JosephMcCarthy has few defenders today, and even the most stringent anti-communists generally dislike him. However, he frequently gets MisBlamed for excesses of the era that he had nothing to do with, such as the House Un-American Activities Committee (he was a senator) and UsefulNotes/TheHollywoodBlacklist. [=McCarthy=] is often thought of as the originator of militant anti-communism in the American government during the Second RedScare, but the means he used didn't originate with him -- he merely took them UpToEleven. While [=McCarthy=] was certainly damaging in many ways, he was the one who fueled up the fire, not the one who started it.
* Ty Cobb had a reputation as a violent racist for many years. However, this unflattering image of Cobb was subsequently discovered to be largely the result of forgery and falsifications by his first biographer, sportswriter Al Stump. While Cobb did get into a few fights, his reputation for violence is heavily exaggerated, and he wasn't the only baseball player of the era who did so. Cobb was also a philanthropist who founded a hospital and an educational foundation. As for his alleged racism, he grew up in a family of abolitionists and was a major supporter of integrating baseball. While he really did attack a heckler who accused him of being half-black, he was angry about the [[YourMom implied insult against his mother]] rather than the allegation of him being mixed-race.
* [[UsefulNotes/PopeAlexanderVI Rodrigo Borgia]] is often depicted as the archetype of the [[SinisterMinister corrupt and evil churchman,]] and sometimes as a proto-mafia don. And he was corrupt. But the level of corruption he got up to was pretty much par for the course in his era. The reason he is remembered for his corruption when many of the corrupt notables of the age were arguably even worse was because of all the corrupt notables of the day, he was the only one to become Pope. As such, he looked much worse than he actually was because people held him to a higher standard.
** His children frequently get Historical Villain Upgrades as well. Cesare really ''was'' a pretty awful person (though ''VideoGame/AssassinsCreedBrotherhood'' may still be taking it too far with the supernatural conspiracy thing). On the other hand, Lucrezia, frequently portrayed as a catty and scheming poisoner, was probably nothing of the sort: there's no evidence for her poisoning anyone, and she made peace with her rivals and was well-loved in her territory of Ferrara.
Added DiffLines:
* It's quite common for depictions of Late Antiquity and the Early Middle Ages (starting since the 19th century, but still present to some extent even now) to do this to the entirety of Christianity, portraying its proponents as violent, backwards [[TheFundamentalist fundamentalists]] who destroyed the "enlightened" Classical era of Rome and Greece, ushered in the Dark Ages, and only spread to the extent that it did through intimidation and sheer force. While there were absolutely violent clashes between Christians and Greco-Roman polytheists (the rather gruesome execution of Hypatia, the world's earliest documented woman scientist, is particularly notorious), the consensus among credible historians is that all the brute force in the world couldn't have made the Christians as successful as they were without many genuinely positive traits that made their worldview more appealing than the polytheists' to ordinary people. Among other things, they cared for and comforted people with terminal illnesses such as plague and leprosy in an era where most abandoned them and just waited for them to die, offered a considerable easier method of attaining a good afterlife without complicated rituals, and, while obviously not ''great'' by modern standards, significantly expanded women's rights compared to polytheism. It is also not true that Christians deliberately destroyed ancient knowledge and in doing so caused the Dark Ages (itself now considered a very outdated term); in fact, the most intelligent and educated people of the Early Medieval period tended to ''be'' Christians, especially monks and nuns, and in Medieval times it was believed that God encouraged humans to study the aspects of his creation. The rejection of science by religious hardliners is actually a '''much''' later development in Christianity, and, incidentally, Islam as well.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 38 (click to see context) from:
* UsefulNotes/LizzieBorden, who was tried -- and ''acquitted'' -- of murdering her father and stepmother in 1892, is almost universally demonized in the media, where she tends to be portrayed as an unhinged psychopath. In truth, this perception of her was due to the brutal nature of the crime itself, ostracism from her community, and the intense media attention given to it. While her guilt or innocence continues to be debated, she definitely was not on the same level as most other notorious killers. Her motive, if guilty, apparently stemmed from a family dispute. Also, few people remember that Lizzie was an avid animal lover all her life and upon her death left most of her estate to a local animal shelter.
to:
* UsefulNotes/LizzieBorden, who was tried for -- and ''acquitted'' of -- of murdering her father and stepmother in 1892, is almost universally demonized in the media, where she tends to be portrayed as an unhinged psychopath. In truth, this perception of her was due to the brutal nature of the crime itself, ostracism from her community, and the intense media attention given to it. While her guilt or innocence continues to be debated, she definitely was not on the same level as most other notorious killers. Her motive, if guilty, apparently stemmed from a family dispute. Also, few people remember that Lizzie was an avid animal lover all her life and upon her death left most of her estate to a local animal shelter.
* Agustín de Iturbide, liberator of UsefulNotes/{{Mexico}}, tends to get this treatment for two main reasons: the first being him fighting as a royalist against the insurgency, which has since been characterized as the heroes; and the second is him having himself crowned TheEmperor of Mexico and dissolving Congress. A lot of nuance is ignored for both of these actions. In truth, Iturbide was all for independence, but the beginning actions of the insurgents were so atrocious (basically an ethnic war against Spaniards and killing innocent civilians, whether they be men, women, or even [[WouldHurtAChild children]] and [[WouldHarmASenior the elderly]]) that he couldn't sympathize with them. Eventually, he [[StartMyOwn started his own movement for independence]] and accomplished in seven months what the insurgents couldn't do in eleven years. The insurgency's atrocities didn't stop them from getting a HistoricalHeroUpgrade, much to the detriment of Iturbide's reputation. Him being criticized for making himself emperor also ignores the fact that he was enormously popular with the masses and only accepted the throne reluctantly because of overwhelming public support for the idea. In fact, he outright ''rejected'' previous attempts to make him the monarch of an independent Mexico. Due to the Congress failing at its task of writing a new constitution for México, Iturbide dissolved Congress and replaced it with a smaller organism made up of the same representatives. This movement, intended to bring an end to power struggles, would be used by his detractors to forever brand him as a despot. Up to this day, in Mexico his actions are largely unknown or attributed unjustly to others, a fate which many an impartial historian has decried as incredibly unfair, denying him the recognition for his deeds of making his nation free, giving it a name (México) and creating its famous flag and coat of arms.
* With the polarized view of American foreign policy worldwide, as well as the backlash towards said foreign policy, it is uncommon to see this trope applied to every single president of the US in countries with an extremely negative view of US foreign policy.
* Government {{corrupt|Politician}}ion tends to [[NeverLiveItDown reflect badly on the person who headed the affected government at the time]], even if [[MisBlamed they were more honest than their subordinates]]. In the US, for example, the administrations of UsefulNotes/UlyssesSGrant and UsefulNotes/WarrenHarding set then-new benchmarks for corruption and they were regularly ranked among the country's worst presidents for decades afterwards. Later, their (admittedly rather timid by modern standards) pro-civil rights stances would be rediscovered and applauded by a more receptive audience.
* While there were many Confederate generals and politicians who received a HistoricalHeroUpgrade thanks to the Lost Cause movement, one notable figure managed to land squarely in this trope. Lt. General James Longstreet was, along with Stonewall Jackson, one of Robert E. Lee's most important generals. He served with distinction at the battle of Bull Run, the Peninsular Campaign, Second Bull Run, Antietam and Fredericksburg. But it was his conduct at Gettysburg that drew the most controversy, specifically the attack on Cemetery Hill on Jul 2nd that Longstreet delayed because his troops hadn't arrived. As the Lost Cause narrative exalted Lee, the loss at Gettsyburg, and the whole war, meant the blame fell on Longstreet. Longstreet was an easy target because post-war he willingly joined the Republican Party, openly support Ulysses S. Grant for the presidency and attended his inauguration. Finally, while Lost Cause mythology did its best to emphasize the importance of state's rights in starting the conflict and diminish the role played by slavery, Longstreet bluntly said "I never heard of any other cause of the quarrel than slavery."
* Government {{corrupt|Politician}}ion tends to [[NeverLiveItDown reflect badly on the person who headed the affected government at the time]], even if [[MisBlamed they were more honest than their subordinates]]. In the US, for example, the administrations of UsefulNotes/UlyssesSGrant and UsefulNotes/WarrenHarding set then-new benchmarks for corruption and they were regularly ranked among the country's worst presidents for decades afterwards. Later, their (admittedly rather timid by modern standards) pro-civil rights stances would be rediscovered and applauded by a more receptive audience.
* While there were many Confederate generals and politicians who received a HistoricalHeroUpgrade thanks to the Lost Cause movement, one notable figure managed to land squarely in this trope. Lt. General James Longstreet was, along with Stonewall Jackson, one of Robert E. Lee's most important generals. He served with distinction at the battle of Bull Run, the Peninsular Campaign, Second Bull Run, Antietam and Fredericksburg. But it was his conduct at Gettysburg that drew the most controversy, specifically the attack on Cemetery Hill on Jul 2nd that Longstreet delayed because his troops hadn't arrived. As the Lost Cause narrative exalted Lee, the loss at Gettsyburg, and the whole war, meant the blame fell on Longstreet. Longstreet was an easy target because post-war he willingly joined the Republican Party, openly support Ulysses S. Grant for the presidency and attended his inauguration. Finally, while Lost Cause mythology did its best to emphasize the importance of state's rights in starting the conflict and diminish the role played by slavery, Longstreet bluntly said "I never heard of any other cause of the quarrel than slavery."
Changed line(s) 62 (click to see context) from:
* The Weimar-era Communist Party of Germany is often painted as wholly complicit in Hitler's rise due to their refusal to work with the Social Democratic Party in forming a coalition against the Nazi Party, with the KPD being painted as ether self-righteous Stalinists slavishly obeying Moscow's dictates that social democrats were just another form of fascism or reckless accelerationists who thought that Hitler's regime would usher in a Communist revolution. While the Stalinist and accelerationist parts are true, and the communists were a major reason for Hitler's seizure of power, they were hardly the only ones to blame. There were many other factions that also played a key role in facilitating the rise of the Nazis (the majority of the parties in the Reichstag supported the Enabling Act, and it was a right-wing politician, Franz von Papen, who thought Hitler could be controlled by the political establishment in the first place). It also ignores the reasons aside from accelerationism and dictates from the Soviet Union for the commies' refusal to work with the social democrats. There was significant bad blood between the two parties, dating back to the German Revolution of 1918-19 when the social democrats sided against the communists.
to:
* The Weimar-era Communist Party of Germany is often painted as wholly complicit in Hitler's rise due to their refusal to work with the Social Democratic Party in forming a coalition against the Nazi Party, with the KPD being painted as ether self-righteous Stalinists slavishly obeying Moscow's dictates that social democrats were just another form of fascism or reckless accelerationists who thought that Hitler's regime would usher in a Communist communist revolution. While the Stalinist and accelerationist parts are true, true [[note]]the party even had "[[TemptingFate After Hitler, our turn]]" as an unofficial slogan[[/note]], and the communists really were a major reason for Hitler's seizure of power, they were hardly the only ones to blame. There were many other factions that also played a key role in facilitating the rise of the Nazis (the majority of the parties in the Reichstag supported the Enabling Act, and it was a right-wing politician, Franz von Papen, who thought Hitler could be controlled by the political establishment in the first place). It also ignores the reasons aside from accelerationism and dictates from the Soviet Union for the commies' refusal to work with the social democrats. There was significant bad blood between the two parties, dating back to the German Revolution of 1918-19 when the social democrats sided against the communists.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Deleted line(s) 3 (click to see context) :
[[folder:Common Cases]]
Changed line(s) 63,64 (click to see context) from:
* The Weimar-era Communist Party of Germany is often painted as wholly complicit in Hitler's rise due to their refusal to work with the Social Democratic Party in forming a coalition against the Nazi Party, with the KPD being painted as ether self-righteous Stalinists slavishly obeying Moscow's dictates that social democrats were just another form of fascism or reckless accelerationists who thought that Hitler's regime would usher in a Communist revolution. While the Stalinist and accelerationist parts are true, and the communists were a major reason for Hitler's seizure of power, they were hardly the only ones to blame. There were many other factions that also played a key role in facilitating the rise of the Nazis (the majority of the parties in the Reichstag supported the Enabling Act, and it was a right-wing politician, Franz von Papen, who thought Hitler could be controlled by the political establishment in the first place). It also ignores the reasons aside from accelerationism and dictates from the Soviet Union for the commies' refusal to work with the social democrats. There was significant bad blood between the two parties, dating back to the German Revolution of 1918-19 when the social democrats sided against the communists.
[[/folder]]
[[/folder]]
to:
* The Weimar-era Communist Party of Germany is often painted as wholly complicit in Hitler's rise due to their refusal to work with the Social Democratic Party in forming a coalition against the Nazi Party, with the KPD being painted as ether self-righteous Stalinists slavishly obeying Moscow's dictates that social democrats were just another form of fascism or reckless accelerationists who thought that Hitler's regime would usher in a Communist revolution. While the Stalinist and accelerationist parts are true, and the communists were a major reason for Hitler's seizure of power, they were hardly the only ones to blame. There were many other factions that also played a key role in facilitating the rise of the Nazis (the majority of the parties in the Reichstag supported the Enabling Act, and it was a right-wing politician, Franz von Papen, who thought Hitler could be controlled by the political establishment in the first place). It also ignores the reasons aside from accelerationism and dictates from the Soviet Union for the commies' refusal to work with the social democrats. There was significant bad blood between the two parties, dating back to the German Revolution of 1918-19 when the social democrats sided against the communists.
[[/folder]]communists.
[[/folder]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
Here are some figures frequently given this treatment:
[[folder:Common Cases]]
* At least in the US, Benedict Arnold, who is considered a vile, cowardly traitor, but started out as a very capable American commander during UsefulNotes/TheAmericanRevolution. However, he had made himself powerful enemies (many of whom were in Congress) during the war, and it all ended when they managed to convince Congress and the upper brass that he would not deserve or need any of the promotions or additional wages for his military service (while he deserved them, there was often ''not enough money'' that the government could spare). To evade dishonorable consequences, he even attempted to resign, which [[UsefulNotes/GeorgeWashington Washington]] [[ResignationsNotAccepted rejected]]. In retaliation, he tried to sell the fort at West Point to the British, and now monuments that would depict him as a hero in the US only depict his ''boot'', the foot that was injured in a major battle he had fought for America.[[note]]At the time, after having credit for the victory stolen by his commanding officer who had done much less than Arnold to win it, he's said to have wished that the bullet had struck his heart instead. Had that actually happened, it's likely that Benedict Arnold would been remembered as a great martyr of the revolution rather than as the US equivalent of Judas Iscariot.[[/note]] It's worth noting that the British he defected to despised him as well, both because they did not at all respect traitors (even ones helping their side) and because he was apparently a massive JerkAss on a personal level that was an absolute chore to deal with. Him botching the commands he was given didn't help.
* La Malinche, a Nahua woman who had an affair with UsefulNotes/HernanCortez and helped him in his conquest of the Aztec Empire, is seen by many in contemporary Mexico as a traitor for helping the Conquistadors to subjugate "her people." Often unmentioned and downplayed are that (a) before she met Cortés she was a slave — her stepmother [[MadeASlave sold her into slavery]] in childhood, whereas Cortés [[BecauseYouWereNiceToMe trusted her and financially supported her after the conquest]], and (b) she wasn’t even an Aztec — she came from a town called Paynala before she was sold into slavery in another town. So she can't accurately be classified as a traitor — and in fact the Aztec Empire was vehemently hated among the other tribes and towns in Mexico. Cortés won these people over very easily, and it seems a bit unfair to condemn La Malinche for siding with him and others of her own people [[CategoryTraitor against the people who enslaved her]].
* One of the best-known examples is the composer Antonio Salieri, contemporary to Music/WolfgangAmadeusMozart. History records that he was Mozart's (and Music/LudwigVanBeethoven's) friend and collaborator, and also a mentor to Mozart's youngest son Franz. Various works of fiction, [[OlderThanTheyThink going back at least to the mid-19th century]], portray him as Mozart's ArchEnemy and secret murderer. The most famous example is the play ''Theatre/{{Amadeus}}'' by Peter Shaffer, which was adapted into a multiple-Oscar-winning film. While Salieri might not have been ''quite'' [[OvershadowedByAwesome as good as Mozart]] by most reckoning, he was still a fantastic composer. The basis for viewing Mozart and Salieri as enemies comes from a few letters by Wolfgang and his father that gripe about Salieri receiving a desirable commission, though this is only natural for professionals competing for the same business. It's also at odds with the fictional version, which has Salieri as TheResenter toward Mozart, who is oblivious to Salieri's ill-will toward him. The reason why Salieri was vilified was basically Italophobic German nationalism, who wanted to promote German musicians as greater than Italians like Salieri and others.[[note]]Ironically, while Salieri was born in Italy, he was trained and lived much of his life in Austria and his music was heavily influenced by Germans. And the Austrian-born Mozart was deeply influenced by Italian orchestral and operatic style. Music rarely respects national boundaries, no matter what the nationalists wanted to believe.[[/note]]
* The historical and legendary figure Ja'far ibn Yahya al-Barmaki, vizier to Harun al-Rashid, hasn't been given a Historical Villain Upgrade ''exactly'' ... but try finding an evil vizier in a story set in ArabianNightsDays whose name ''isn't'' some spelling of [[UsefulNotes/GrandVizierJafar Jafar]]. Likely more due to sloppy research. The cartoon character ComicBook/{{Iznogoud}} could be considered a Historical Villain Upgrade of Ja'far. More generally, the position of vizier itself has had something of a historical villain upgrade, to the point that it even has its [[EvilChancellor own trope]]. While there have certainly been plenty of examples of scheming and traitors among top advisers, most people who have held such trusted positions did so because they were, in fact, [[TheGoodChancellor trustworthy]].
* UsefulNotes/RasputinTheMadMonk is generally considered nowadays as a relatively harmless (if highly sleazy) eccentric religious figure, but during his life he was thought to hold the imperial family in thrall via strange supernatural powers.[[note]]This was more of a polite fiction among the aristocracy, as it allowed them to shift the blame onto him for all the bad decisions made by Nicholas II, who could not be criticized directly.[[/note]] Therefore, most media depict him as a raving madman at best, an EvilSorcerer at worst. The fact that he was apocryphally [[RasputinianDeath described as supernaturally resilient]] didn't help his reputation either. [[note]]We say "apocryphally" because the original account of his murder was written by Prince Felix Yusupov, who supposedly organized the assassination; it was reputed even back in the day to be deliberately inaccurate (and allgedly changed whenever Yusupov was short on funds), but it's the one everyone remembers.[[/note]] In movies, games, and TV shows, he's presented as a kind of EvilSorceror (''WesternAnimation/{{Anastasia}}''); in the Franchise/MarvelUniverse, Rasputin was a mutant; etc.
* UsefulNotes/KingJohnOfEngland, villain of the ''Myth/RobinHood'' stories. While John certainly deserved some of his reputation (he was a [[GeneralFailure bad general]] and very good at alienating the nobility), he was far from the craven usurper depicted in the later legends. While he didn't have the ''only'' valid claim on the throne, his claim was hardly weak. He also wasn't an illiterate lackwit, as some popular folklore depicts him, having written many books on law and being considered one of the premier legal minds of his age, so much so that his judgement had often been sought prior to his kingship in regards to legal disputes. He is also recognized as the founder of the modern British navy. There's also the fact that he is popularly OvershadowedByAwesome relative to his brother, UsefulNotes/RichardTheLionheart, who came to be seen as a hero after his death, on account of his martial prowess never mind his much-criticized warmongering which led him to burn through the English treasury, which basically left John a mess of a kingdom. This is why there was such disdain for John negotiating with King Phillip II of France instead of defeating him on the battlefield like it was presumed Richard would've done. John was a mediocrity and since his reign led to the Magna Carta, he obviously came to be the DesignatedVillain, i.e. the weak king that led to expansion of Parliamentary rights. But he was not the worst king nor the most tyrannical.
* UsefulNotes/RichardIII. He didn't betray his elder brother Edward. He might or might not have murdered any of his family members. He definitely wasn't nearly as [[RedRightHand deformed]] as he's generally portrayed (though exhumation of his skeleton in 2013 revealed pronounced scoliosis, so his hunchback wasn't a complete fabrication). Who really killed his young nephews, the "Princes in the Tower," is unclear -- Richard definitely kept them in a GildedCage before their disappearance, and had them declared illegitimate in order to claim the throne, and they disappeared forever nearly two years before Richard was killed at Bosworth, but the details of their deaths remain a mystery.
** The main culprit for Richard's smear campaign is Creator/WilliamShakespeare's [[Theatre/RichardIII play]] about him, which was written over 100 years after his death and was basically created for the benefit of the direct descendant of the guy who overthrew him -- Shakespeare based his play off a published 'history' that was written by one of Richard's deadliest enemies, who was then made Bishop of Canterbury after Richard's death by Henry Tudor.
** Notably averted by the University of York, where a popular legend credits him as the first person to propose establishing a university in York. The first formal proposal that we know of came during the reign of [[UsefulNotes/TheHouseOfStuart James I]] over a century after Richard's death, and the university itself [[SavedFromDevelopmentHell opened in 1963]]; still, Richard's ties to York at least make the legend plausible.
** Most historians also stress his incredible legal reforms during his time at the Council of the North and furthermore his very active monarchy which in its brief rule, passed far more legal statutes than King Edward IV and led to the poor being given the right of bail.
* [[UsefulNotes/TheHouseOfHanover George III]] of Great Britain is popularly remembered by Americans as a tyrant, mostly due to the way he was portrayed by pro-independence propaganda. In reality, he had virtually nothing to do with the policies that so annoyed the colonists, but as the sovereign, he received all the blame. As a king, he is actually deemed by history as a rather good one, at least before he lost his mind in his later years. Personally, he had little interest in politics, preferring agriculture and tea. When he met the first American minister to Britain, UsefulNotes/JohnAdams, he stated that he was "the last to consent" to independence, but wished the US well as an independent country and hoped Britain and the US would get along in the future.
* China's first emperor UsefulNotes/QinShiHuangdi gets this a lot, owing to his historical reputation as a brutal tyrant ([[RepressiveButEfficient albeit an effective one]]). He's the BigBad in ''Literature/BridgeOfBirds'', in which he is also immortal and has magic powers. His {{Expy}} in ''VideoGame/WorldOfWarcraft'', Emperor Lei Shen, fares no better, given [[ShockAndAwe demonic lightning powers]] and [[ANaziByAnyOtherName Nazi-style racial theories]] to make him look more evil. Additionally, the Emperor in the film ''Film/{{Hero}}'' is based on him, and is sort of an uneasy mix between this trope and HistoricalHeroUpgrade- he wins, and many thought the film had the odd lesson of "an imperfect government is better than civil war."
* While [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Empress_Dowager_Cixi Empress Dowager Cixi]] is ''hardly'' a saint, the traditional view of her is of an EvilMatriarch thanks to the media. [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Empress_Dowager_Cixi#Historical_opinions There's still a lot of debate]] on how much of this is true and how much of this came from Chinese politics using her image as a scapegoat: more than one biographer depicts her as an IronLady who could be very cruel or selfish at one moment (like amassing a huge personal fortune in times when ImperialChina was falling down, and being the number 1 suspect behind her nephew's death by poisoning) and very kind at the other (like thanking a nurse who took care of her when she was ill by releasing her from [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foot_binding footbinding]] and making sure she healed completely).
* In films and other works featuring [[UsefulNotes/MaryOfScotland Mary, Queen of Scots]], UsefulNotes/ElizabethI gets this treatment. If the film is about Elizabeth, Mary, Queen of Scots, Mary Tudor, and/or Philip II of Spain will be treated this way.
** ''Queen Elizabeth: The Golden Age'' [[AmericansHateTingle bombed in Spain]] precisely because of this trope. Spanish audiences were insulted with its depiction of Philip II (a remarkably pious man) as -- quoting one critic -- "a cackling, Spanish Doctor Doom." And its prequel, ''Film/{{Elizabeth}}'', certainly followed the formula insofar as both her sister Mary and the Catholic Church at large were concerned.
** This trend stretches back to Schiller's play ''Mary Stuart'' (1800) and even earlier.
** The 1940 German film ''Das Herz der Königin'' ("The Heart of the Queen"), viewed by many critics as an anti-British propaganda movie, portrays Mary (Zarah Leander) as a beautiful saintly martyr (she sings, too), while Elizabeth is a bitter malicious dried up spinster who will stop at nothing to make her cousin miserable and eventually murder her.
** The BBC miniseries ''Gunpowder, Treason, and Plot'' treated Mary far more sympathetically than Elizabeth. Ironically, it portrayed James I, the main character, as quite a JerkAss.[[note]]Depicting James I as a JerkAss, however, may be more TruthInTelevision than it is this trope. Still, Creator/JohnDonne seems to have thought well of him.[[/note]]
* Elizabeth's mother, UsefulNotes/AnneBoleyn, also tends to get hit with this a lot. While she certainly had a temper and was capable of holding a grudge, everyone near-universally agrees that she wasn't guilty of the charges of treason, incest and adultery at her trial.
* Thomas Cromwell is another convenient Tudor villain for carrying out some of UsefulNotes/HenryVIII's more tyrannical acts, such as the execution of Anne Boleyn and the Dissolution of the Monasteries -- at best he was portrayed as an amoral YesMan, at worst outright evil. He's been given more nuanced media portrayals in the 21st century (most famously in ''Literature/WolfHall''). This might be due to ValuesDissonance as the narrative of an intelligent SelfMadeMan garners much more interest than it used to.
* Mary I, better known as Bloody Mary, older sister of Elizabeth, gets this near universally (her nickname reflects that). However, though her government did burn a number of Protestants for heresy, it was no worse than what Elizabeth did to Catholics. This included being [[CruelAndUnusualDeath hanged, drawn and quartered]] for the "crime" of harboring a priest, or being a priest oneself and administering the sacraments to closet Catholics in the country. It was also a crime to not attend Anglican services if you were a Catholic (although that would only get a fine). Mary's crimes were commemorated by [[WrittenByTheWinners later Protestant works]], such as Foxe's ''Book of Martyrs''. They did not care about (or outright approved of) Catholic persecution by Elizabeth. At the time, no one had the concept of religious freedom except for a tiny radical minority. Further, while Mary did restore Catholicism, she did not reverse all of her father's (Henry VIII) reforms, recognizing the reality of the situation, making English Catholicism its own religion.
* The Spanish Empire as a whole gets into this in Anglophone media, if you see the Cross of Burgundy in a film that does not have the characters in question being Spanish themselves then nine out of ten those characters are villains who are either bigoted zealots or avaricious brutes. This, of course, was the result of the Spanish Empire being so powerful both in Europe and overseas and with so many enemies in various fronts (the Dutch, the French, the English, the many, many Protestant German princes) that it was often subject to slander and evil propaganda, the Spanish have a term for this: La Leyenda Negra (The Black Legend). The actions of some of the conquistadores were indeed truly horrendous towards the indigenous population, but people often forget two things: (a) the Spanish monarchs were pissed off at these atrocities enough to send armies to get the conquistadors in line and gave legal protection and equal rights to the Amerindians as a Spaniard in Spain once the vice-royalties were established (much more than what happened in the Thirteen colonies), (b) the disastrous depopulation of the American natives was more the product of disease than war casualties or the abuses of colonial authorities.
** Despite its infamy, UsefulNotes/TheSpanishInquisition actually killed remarkably few people. The latest archival research suggests about 3,000 executions over the course of over 300 years. This was partly because the standard of proof required to convict someone was actually very high, and innocence was usually presumed. While killing people because of their religious beliefs is undoubtedly bad, Spain had among the ''lowest'' amounts of religious violence; witchcraft executions in the rest of Europe alone utterly dwarfed the Inquisition's death toll by orders of magnitude,[[note]][[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Witch-hunt#Execution_statistics There were roughly]] 30,000 executions for witchcraft in greater Germany during the same time period, as opposed to less than 1,000 for ''all'' of Southern Europe, of which only a minority were in Spain.[[/note]] much less the big meaty events like the French Wars of Religion. Other CommonKnowledge about the Inquisition (that they burned books, that the ''auto de fe'' involved torture rather than simply being a public penance, that people were burned for being witches, that final authority rested with inquisitors rather than the secular government) is simply from the realm of pure fantasy. Again, its reputation is more the result of English and Dutch media dominance (the two countries were bitter rivals of Spain in the early modern period) than anything real.
* UsefulNotes/LouisXVI of France (king during UsefulNotes/TheFrenchRevolution) is generally seen as either a tyrant or an oaf, and few media will ever depict him as anything else. His actual problem was that he was [[TheDitherer too weak and indecisive]] a ruler, while a stronger one might have been able to prevent the revolution, or at least the worst of it. Louis XVI's actual policies, which include positive and enlightened measures (e.g. in favor of Jews in the Alsace region and of potato-farming) and military and political successes (victory over the old enemy across the Channel in [[UsefulNotes/TheAmericanRevolution the War of American Independence]]) also tend to be forgotten. Even in America, where if France's role is acknowledged at all, it gets credited entirely to the Marquis de Lafayette.
* On the other side of the coin, the French Revolutionaries as a whole frequently get this treatment, especially UsefulNotes/MaximilienRobespierre, who eventually came to be seen as proto-[[UsefulNotes/VladimirLenin Lenin]] and -[[UsefulNotes/JosefStalin Stalin]]. Critics of this depiction point out that he was a man of great personal integrity, to the point of being described as ''L'Incorruptible'' and that he had in fact argued against the War with Austria that escalated the Revolution and made France a target of invasion. He had initially opposed the death penalty. He was loved in his lifetime as a champion of the poor and the working class and did much to clear out the corruption in the military and society, and furthermore alongside the Committee of Public Safety and the National Convention, he also participated in the 1794 Decree to outright abolish slavery by law and dispatched agents to the Caribbean to enforce it, and moved against pro-slavery lobbyists, ordering several of their arrests. Even critics of the ReignOfTerror point out that Robespierre justified it as a wartime necessity only and in fact tried to moderate the excesses of the very people who later stabbed him in the back and guillotined him.
* There are several conspiracy theories surrounding the {{Illuminati}}, who are often portrayed as a group trying to take over the world and create a Big Brother-style {{dystopia}}. However, in their time (end of the 18th century, not before, not later), they weren't too different from your regular BrotherhoodOfFunnyHats. Their New World Order was in fact referring to a republican government and laws based on fundamental human rights (think of the French Revolution). Indeed, this is how the conspiracy theories on them got started: in 1798 a royalist wrote a book blaming the French Revolution on Freemasons and the Illuminati, which then grew steadily over the years.
* The entire Rothschild family often gets this. In various media, works of fiction, and ''especially'' conspiracy theories (and not just anti-Semitic ones), they are portrayed as [[BigBad the leaders of]] TheIlluminati or some equally sinister AncientConspiracy with plans to either TakeOverTheWorld [[OneWorldGovernment by establishing a tyrannical New World Order]] or to kill huge numbers of people and reduce the world's population to less than a billion debt slaves either out of greed or just ForTheEvulz. This is seen in the short film ''The American Dream'' which portrays the Rothschilds (referred to as red-shields) as [[EldritchAbomination tentacled horrors]] ruining the economies of America and England through wars, central banking and the Federal Reserve either to satisfy their avarice or just because.
* In the same vein, 19th-century Freemason Albert Pike also gets this. In real life he isn't really well known outside of Freemasonry circles, but once again works of fiction and conspiracy theories portray him as the man who planned and engineered the concepts for the two world wars and a apocalyptic third one-all in the 1870s, all of wars which will bring about a [[ReligionOfEvil Satanic One World Empire]], all of these plans being recorded in a letter. The reality is that the letter was forged from an unknown source, through hoaxer Leo Taxil is the most probable culprit.
* As alluded to in the Literature section, almost any adaptation of ''Literature/TheThreeMusketeers'' will dump the original novel's moral ambiguities and do this to poor Cardinal Richelieu.
* The [[Literature/TheBountyTrilogy 1932 novelization]] of the mutiny on the HMAV ''Bounty'', and the [[Film/MutinyOnTheBounty 1935]] and [[Film/MutinyOnTheBounty1962 1962]] film adaptions, depict Captain William Bligh[[note]]His rank at the time wasn't even Captain, but Lieutenant.[[/note]] as a ruthless autocrat. Among other things, he is variously shown to have keelhauled a man, flogged a man to death, deprived his men of water until they succumb to dehydration, etc., none of which occurred in reality. Indeed, most who served under him regarded him as rather tame in terms of actual punishment, and a comparison to other contemporary captains seems to support this. For the most part, he seems to have been guilty of nothing more than arrogance, frequent shouting, and giving conflicting orders, much to his crew's frustration. For his day, he would have been considered fairly strict, but fair, and not as strict as he ''could'' have been. Modern historians place the blame more on the crew's long vacation in the tropics, causing them to become overly sensitive to discipline; a lesser emphasis is placed on his tendency towards relentless micromanagement and acerbic wit. The 1984 film ''Film/TheBounty'' takes a revisionist and more historically accurate view of Bligh, depicting [[GrayAndGrayMorality both his good and bad points]], along with the part most depictions completely omit: his almost 4,000-mile long voyage to safely reach Timor in the boat he and the loyal crewman were set adrift on, a remarkable feat by any standard.
* The serial killer called UsefulNotes/JackTheRipper (assuming he was only one person and was indeed a "he", and that the murders were even related at all) was never identified, and only committed five murders. They were tragic, of course, but there were far worse serial killers both before and since then, so much that a case like this would hardly get any attention in modern times. Still, the fact that the brutal murders were never solved make people depict him as the worst SerialKiller in history, and the case is a favorite among fiction writers, who often tend to portray him as far more than any mortal man in their depictions. (For specific examples, see his own Trope page.)
* Kenesaw Mountain Landis, first Commissioner of Baseball. Firstly for the allegation that he had dealt with the Black Sox scandal in a ham-handed and unfair manner (aided by pro-Black Sox portrayals in films like ''Film/EightMenOut'' or ''Film/FieldOfDreams''), with the greatest scorn coming for his treatment of "Shoeless" Joe Jackson (who indeed participated in the fix, took money for it, and kept his teammates' actions secret). This ignores how hated the participating players in the Scandal were at the time, and the implications the scandal held for all of baseball. Secondly, it's often been claimed that Landis was the sole reason for baseball's "color barrier", even to the extent of claiming the Ohio-born-and-raised Landis was an old-school Southern racist. Landis himself stated that the question was up to the owners (most of whom at the time were against integration), and invited black sports reporters to make their case to them. There was also the rather important (up until Branch Rickey said "screw it," and all the other owners followed suit) question of what compensation would be due to Negro League teams in exchange for drafting all their best players; the Negro League teams were profitable business entities in their own right and at the time of integration were predominately owned by African Americans.
* ''UsefulNotes/RMSTitanic'':
** The relatively blameless [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bruce_Ismay J. Bruce Ismay]], the president of the shipping lane, is often portrayed as an arrogant, bullying prick who forces Captain Smith to run the ship full speed into an ice field and then act like a [[DirtyCoward sniveling coward]] who hops aboard the first available lifeboat. While it's perhaps easy to see where this reputation comes from -- jumping into a lifeboat to save yourself while there's still hundreds of women and children aboard the ship is perhaps not going to cast you in the bravest or manliest of lights -- the truth is a bit more complicated, with eyewitness accounts suggesting Ismay was diligent in helping load and lower the lifeboats and only took his seat in one after making sure that there were no women or children there to take it instead. There is also absolutely no evidence Ismay had any influence over Captain Smith's operation of the ship and he had no reasons for the ship to arrive in New York faster than scheduled, seeing that ''Titanic'' would not beat any speed records even if it crossed the ocean a day faster. It seems that he was simply a scapegoat for the general public, who were desperate to make sense of the tragedy and [[ConvictedByPublicOpinion find a villain]] as a way to get catharsis - and Ismay, as the highest-ranked person to escape the sinking alive, was the obvious choice.
** The entire staff and crew of the ''Titanic'' tend to get this with respect to how the Third Class passengers were treated. One is unlikely to learn in a fictional treatment of the disaster that Third Class accommodations aboard White Star's ships in general and ''Titanic'' in particular were well above average for the time, including their own set of cooks to prepare food and stewards to serve it. It is also not true that the officers loading the lifeboats were biased in favor of First Class passengers. Rather, the reason that Third Class passengers took proportionately higher casualties is because their cabins were the farthest from the lifeboats and many got lost in the corridors below deck, and even with this fact Third Class women were much more likely to survive than First Class men. Some adaptations, including the Creator/JamesCameron [[Film/Titanic1997 version]], portray the Stewards deliberately locking Third Class passengers below deck to prevent stampeding, which also probably never happened; the gates did exist, but due to health and immigration laws at the time requiring Third Class to be separated from First and Second. These gates could be opened in case of emergency, and never directly barred the way to the main deck, but in their panic the Stewards forgot to open most of them.
* UsefulNotes/LizzieBorden, who was tried -- and ''acquitted'' -- of murdering her father and stepmother in 1892, is almost universally demonized in the media, where she tends to be portrayed as an unhinged psychopath. In truth, this perception of her was due to the brutal nature of the crime itself, ostracism from her community, and the intense media attention given to it. While her guilt or innocence continues to be debated, she definitely was not on the same level as most other notorious killers. Her motive, if guilty, apparently stemmed from a family dispute. Also, few people remember that Lizzie was an avid animal lover all her life and upon her death left most of her estate to a local animal shelter.
* UsefulNotes/RichardNixon is an unusual example -- he gets this treatment in many, many works but rarely ones that deal directly with his original term of office. We say "original" because the upgrade tends to occur in BadFuture alternate timelines where America has become a {{Dystopia}} (such as ComicBook/{{Watchmen}} or ''Film/BackToTheFuturePartII''). We know they are dystopias because one of the features is that Nixon is still President, usually on his totally unconstitutional third, fourth or fifth term, implying he's running a ''[[PresidentForLife de facto]]'' dictatorship. While he's rarely the BigBad of these settings (in fact he's usually TheGhost), it still fits this trope that the writers thought that Nixon would a) so much as attempt something like this, and b) use his Presidency as further evidence that the setting is a CrapsackWorld (they ''are'' Crapsack, of course; its just a bit much to think that Nixon is one of the main reasons for it). PlayedForLaughs in ''WesternAnimation/{{Futurama}}'' where in the distant future he's a [[BrainInAJar Head in a Jar]] LargeHam CardCarryingVillain (and once again, President, though this time via LoopholeAbuse rather than outright corruption).
** Averted, for once in ''Film/XMenDaysOfFuturePast'', in spite of common portrayals in fiction relaying the public opinion of him after [[NeverLiveItDown the Watergate scandal]]. He treats the growth of the mutant population as another issue to solve as Commander-In-Chief instead of resorting to FantasticRacism, and [[spoiler:chooses to discontinue the Sentinel program after a few mutants prevent his death at the hands of Magneto]].
* UsefulNotes/OdaNobunaga has basically become Japan's go-to guy whenever a series needs an EvilOverlord. While Nobunaga was clearly not a very nice man in RealLife, it is very unlikely that he was ever [[DemonKingNobunaga literally the king of Hell]] like many series like to claim. Indeed, he knew that uniting Japan would benefit the people; he didn't particularly ''care'', but he knew. In that sense, he's a good deal like UsefulNotes/OttoVonBismarck--and the only things that people ever bring up about Bismarck are his genius and cunning. He may have been a ruthless badass during his lifetime even among the already vicious Lords of Japan, but modern works tend to take this to ridiculous (and often evil) extremes.
** Many of his positive actions include tolerating Christians, open borders, modernizing the military and generally attempting to kick start a Japanese Renaissance. Though all of that can be filed under PragmaticVillainy -- tolerating Christians meant he could buy rifles from them, open borders enabled him to hire foreign mercenaries, modernizing his military is self-explanatory, as is his desire for a modern empire rather than a pre-Renaissance one. And while by modern standards these are seen as good things, at the time they were hated by many Japanese traditionalists.
** Almost all depictions of Oda Nobunaga tend to gloss over or be vague about why specific conflicts involving him started. For example, it's pretty inconvenient for Nobunaga's villain status to point out that Asakura-Asai conflict was started because Ashikaga Yoshiaki, whom Nobunaga has just aided to become shogun and was keeping in power, formed a secret anti-Oda alliance with the Asakura with the intention of launching a sneak attack because Yoshiaki realized Nobunaga knew he was the only thing keeping Yoshiaki in power and was more than willing to use that to his advantage when dealing with him. While Asai Nagamasa's aid of the Asakura is portrayed as being done out of a sense of duty, he was in favor of remaining neutral. It is generally accepted that his aid of the Asakura was the result of advice he received indicating the Oda were almost certain to lose and the Asai were trying to be on the winning side. Even with the worst historical portrayal of Nobunaga, there was more going on than his villainous portrayals generally show.
* UsefulNotes/AmakusaShiro joins Nobunaga in villainous portrayals in Japanese media, albeit with the caveat that he's usually depicted as [[FallenHero a once noble person]] [[DealWithTheDevil who sold his soul to the devil]] for {{revenge}} [[DespairEventHorizon in his dying moment.]]
** An exception is the {{josei}} manga Manga/{{Amakusa 1637}}, where Shirou somehow managed [[IncorruptiblePurePureness to remain kind and untarnished]] despite [[BreakTheCutie the horribly raw deal he got]]. [[spoiler: Because he was TooGoodForThisSinfulEarth.]]
* [[UsefulNotes/YagyuJubei Yagyu Munenori]] ranks up there along with Amakusa and Nobunaga in terms of being vilified in Japan. In general, he is an excellent swordsman as well as a shrewd politician. However, he's also a guy who dedicated his life and sword to protect others, he even wrote a book titled "Life-Giving Sword" to further boost that. Since politicians are often turned into AcceptableTargets and his son Mitsuyoshi is often romanticized as someone who disdains politics, Munenori is often turned into an antagonistic evil swordsman AND SleazyPolitician that was the cause of Mitsuyoshi losing an eye or also portrayed as an EvilCounterpart to UsefulNotes/MiyamotoMusashi, another romanticized MasterSwordsman (the two never met). This is an often widespread trope usage on Munenori. Kind of hard being a politician and a father of a folk hero who's thought to be anti-politics (even if Mitsuyoshi eventually returned to political stage after being kicked out).
* American Commodore Matthew C. Perry is famously remembered for making the then-isolationist Japan open its ports for trade to all of the West, but his negotiation tactics weren't so nice: his threats of using his "Black Ships" to reduce the then-capitol Edo to ashes was what coined the term "Gunboat Diplomacy". While it's likely his threats were just chest-puffing and his only real intention was to start trade between Japan and America, it ''definitely'' worked at scaring the Japanese: a fear that persists even to this day, as most Japan-produced media portray Perry as a violent megalomaniac who sought to outright conquer Japan--if not [[TakeOverTheWorld the entire world as well]].
* UsefulNotes/TokugawaIeyasu is usually portrayed to be less evil than Nobunaga, but there was a time when his once strong Shogunate that ruled Japan for 200 years or so while isolating the country from outer world grew weaker in power and then the American ships under the aforementioned Perry came, forcing Japan to open its border and then a chain of events led to the Meiji Restoration where Japan enjoyed advances in technology and research much better than the times of Tokugawa's isolationist policy. Thanks to this, the Tokugawa shogunate (not just Ieyasu himself) is often villified as a group of {{Obstructive Bureaucrat}}s that was only interested in personal power and ruling Japan with iron fist, making people suffer. Former oppositions of Ieyasu especially during the late UsefulNotes/SengokuPeriod, especially UsefulNotes/SanadaYukimura and UsefulNotes/IshidaMitsunari, [[HistoricalHeroUpgrade tend to be upgraded into tragic folk heroes status]], trying to prevent the rise to power of Ieyasu, usually seen as [[SmugSnake a shifty, dastardly raccoon]], only to be tragically thwarted by his dastardly cunningness, and it didn't help that the biggest figures of Meiji Restoration originated from the regions that got the short end of the stick after the Battle of Sekigahara due to Ieyasu's machinations, so the anti-Tokugawa propaganda worked for their favor.
* [[HornyVikings The Norse]] and other Germanic tribesmen tend to suffer from this, with the media often depicting them as brutish, bloodthirsty and violent raiders, plunderers and killers. Sometimes even in media in which they're meant to be the ''protagonists''! In reality, they were no more savage or prone to violence than any other people at the time, with a very sophisticated culture. Most media fails to acknowledge that the "Vikings" are not even a culture of their own, but a specific profession (that is, {{pirate}}s -- which is roughly what "Viking" in Old Norse actually means -- although since pirates were typically "brutish, bloodthirsty and violent raiders, plunderers and killers" anyway, the depiction of the Viking raiders themselves is not too far off), while the Norse people they were a part of were in some ways ''more'' advanced culturally than their European contemporaries -- if nothing else, they had better hygiene than other Europeans and women were closer to formal equality with men in their society.
* This is a common tendency when depicting some of the more notorious emperors in Roman history. This isn't helped by the fact that histories of the Roman Emperors were often [[WrittenByTheWinners written by their critics once they were dead]] -- some of them decades, if not centuries after the fact -- who had no compunction against simply inventing negative stories about them.
** Emperor UsefulNotes/{{Caligula}} gets this a lot, even on [[TheCaligula this very wiki]]. Most sources agree that he was a terrible emperor (although modern historians have come to question how much of this is true and how much was exaggerated or outright made up). However, most sources ''also'' agree that he was actually very good emperor in the first six months or so of his reign, and that he then went insane. Philo of Alexandria, for example, claimed that he became mad after nearly dying of a serious illness in the eighth month of his reign, leading modern historians to speculate that he may have suffered brain damage as a result of a prolonged high fever. In short, while he may have indeed done bad things, not all of the horrible stories about him may actually be true, and his heel-turn was probably not entirely his fault.
** Emperor UsefulNotes/{{Nero}} has a reputation for, at best, playing the lyre during the Great Fire of Rome, or, at worst, setting the city on fire deliberately. In fact, the most reliable source on the fire, Tacitus, states that Nero hurried back to the city to oversee the relief efforts, paying out of his own pockets quite generously. Although his actions immediately following this (taking advantage of the situation by clearing out 100-300 acres of the burnt-out city to built his lavish ''Domus Aurea'', which also likely fueled the rumors that he was responsible for the fire), quickly extinguished whatever good will he earned from this gesture. It's generally regarded by historians that much of Nero's reputation as a monster comes from his having favored the common people and having disdain for the aristocracy, which didn't sit well with the aristocrats who wrote all the historical accounts since the common people tended to be illiterate. What really didn't help his reputation is that he was the first Roman Emperor to persecute Christians; after Christianity became Rome's dominant religion, his reputation as a tyrannical madman was effectively sealed.
** To a lesser extent, UsefulNotes/{{Augustus}} is also at the receiving end of this in some works. They tend to play up his perceived cowardice (which he earned due to his frequent bouts of sickness forcing him to not participate in battles), sociopathy, and keen skill in manipulating people. Common historical consensus on the man agrees that he was an extremely ambitious man with a mind for politics over warfare (which is no slight against him as Roman politics were a jungle of conspiracies, corruption, and assassinations), was very loyal to those who chose to side with him (as seen with his long relationship with Marcus Agrippa), managed to drag Rome out of decades of civil war and turn it into an empire which lasted for five centuries, and was capable of both extreme acts of leniency and stunning acts of cruelty to make it happen. While many consider him the man who "killed" the Roman Republic, the reality is that the republic had been effectively dead for decades due to the erosion of political norms both causing severe instability and enabling a parade of strongmen to amass enormous power for themselves. Especially notable here are works focused on Augustus' (then still known as Octavian) ally turned political nemesis, Marc Antony, who in real life was in fact by far the more brutal of the two.
** Emperor Commodus almost certainly did not assassinate his father, Marcus Aurelius, to become Emperor: most evidence points to the Antonine plague doing him in, and there's no evidence that Aurelius intended for anyone else to succeed him. He was certainly a terrible emperor as well, but claims that he single-handedly ended the Pax Romana and was the cause of the Empire's eventual destruction is also an exaggeration: he certainly accelerated the decline, but the growing conglomeration of Germanic tribes to the north, Rome being ravaged by the aforementioned plague, and economic meltdowns caused by hyper-inflation are also to blame, all of which happened without Commodus' involvement. Even a second Marcus Aurelius or Trajan would've been hard-pressed to counter those trends.
* Speaking of the Ancient Romans, they also play host to another common upgrade that's not given to a person or a group, but a concept: ''paterfamilias'', which gave a Roman father absolute authority over his children, including the right to kill them. While obviously extremely harsh by modern standards, this principle has given rise to the portrayal of Roman fathers in modern media as cruel tyrants over their families who brutalize their children for minor imperfections. The consensus among actual historians is the far less lurid story that the overwhelming majority of Roman dads loved their kids just as much as parents from any other culture did, and the invocation of the more extreme tenets of ''paterfamilias'' was likely extremely rare, and typically done only in the case of the child committing a serious crime such as themselves murdering a family member.
* Early-20th-century cult leader Creator/AleisterCrowley was certainly a controversial figure, but he was clearly ''not'' into HollywoodSatanism, did not have [[ReligionIsMagic magical powers,]] didn't fit the AristocratsAreEvil Trope (even if he was evil, he was not an aristocrat) and wasn't a [[OurVampiresAreDifferent vampire]], contrary to works by people like Creator/AlanMoore, Creator/GrantMorrison, and many others, mostly in comic books.
* Porfirio Díaz is best remembered as a {{hypocrite}} who [[FullCircleRevolution championed liberalism in the early years of his political career and then became a dictator]]. After UsefulNotes/TheMexicanRevolution, some Mexicans even began to depict him as evil incarnate, spreading stories like the one that as a boy he maliciously set his brother on fire. In truth, while Díaz did become an authoritarian, he consistently tried to govern benevolently. Earlier on in his administration, he was a very effective leader, breaking the power of Mexico's infamous brigands that were a plague on travelers and setting up the country's infrastructure so it would benefit the nation for years to come. The problems that started later on were largely a result of him going senile and being increasingly SurroundedByIdiots and [[YesMan yes-men]]. His main flaw was that he had CondescendingCompassion for the lower classes. He's also remembered for his alleged snobbery and [[BoomerangBigot self-hating racism]] in powdering his face to appear more white; while the face-powdering may or may not be true, there is no evidence that Díaz ever tried to hide or had anything but pride in his mestizo heritage.
* William Tecumseh Sherman is frequently remembered as a war criminal who devastated the American South -- particularly Georgia. However, while it's true that he attacked civilian supplies and infrastructure, the damage he did was almost entirely limited to property. The number of civilians killed by his army was vanishingly small. Sherman's objective was to end UsefulNotes/TheAmericanCivilWar as quickly as possible by attacking the Confederacy's morale and economic assets, not wantonly slaughter Southerners. While there are legitimate reasons his total war was and is so controversial, he was a far cry from the mass murderer many remember him as. Though this perception is most common the South, as other parts of the country often consider him a hero [[IDidWhatIHadToDo doing what needed to be done]], especially after the [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning_School Dunning School]] fell out of favor.
* Recent portrayals of UsefulNotes/ThomasJefferson often play up his elitism and racist hypocrisy for claiming that "all men are equal" while being a wealthy slaveowner. While Jefferson viewed non-whites as inferior people, he held relatively egalitarian views, [[FairForItsDay at least by the standards of early America]]. As president, Jefferson ended the Atlantic slave trade and drafted plans to restrict and eventually abolished slavery. While he owned slaves, nearly all of the Founding Fathers supported the practice, and Jefferson was one of the few who tried to free his own slaves but was prevented by legal and financial restrictions. Jefferson also supported protection for religious minorities and the poor, which was opposed by many like Alexander Hamilton. Although he is considered every bit the PoliticallyIncorrectHero by modern standards, he genuinely tried to promote equality to a greater extent than many of his contemporaries.
* One that overlaps with HistoricalHeroUpgrade (of someone else) and AHeroToHisHometown: in America, UsefulNotes/HarrySTruman is viewed generically positively for the most part. In ''Russia'', on the other hand, he is given the whole blame for starting the Cold War even now, decades after it ended. It’s true that Stalin had wanted to keep the alliance after World War II and Truman was dead-set against it, but giving him the whole blame ignores [[PeoplesRepublicOfTyranny the reason why]] he didn’t trust Stalin. [[Administrivia/RuleOfCautiousEditingJudgment And that’s all that will be said.]]
* It is extremely common for far-left and anti-American circles to do this to the entirety of American history, portraying the Founding Fathers as violent slaveowners seeking to preserve slavery and commit mass genocide on Native Americans who only rebelled against Britain because the crown would not allow them to do either of these things and whose ideology of Manifest Destiny directly inspired the Nazis, while portraying WWII-era America as doing almost nothing to stop the Nazis when the Soviet Union was doing all the hard work, and even [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Paperclip recruited Nazis post-war to gain an advantage over the Soviets]]. While many of the Founders were slaveowners, Britain only abolished slavery in the 1830s, and it is entirely possible had the revolution not occured, the slaveowners in the Caribbean and the North American South could have formed a power bloc to deter abolitionist efforts in the forseeable future. Britain and it's colonies were [[NotSoDifferent no more benevolent]] towards indigenous peoples as well, if their treatment of Canadian and Australian natives were any indication. Furthermore, with regards to the inspiration Manifest Destiny had on Nazism, Hitler was not solely inspired by American Manifest Destiny, but was also inspired by British Imperialism, [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Herero_and_Namaqua_genocide#Link_between_the_Herero_genocide_and_the_Holocaust the genocides committed by the German Empire in Nambia]], and the Armenian genocide. With regards to World War II, while it was true that the Soviets played the bigger role in defeating the Nazis in Europe, America played a important role in facilitating their victory through Lend-Lease. The Americans were also not the only country to recruit Nazis post-war in preparations for the Cold War, the Soviets themselves also [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Osoaviakhim used Nazi scientists]] to strengthen it's own rocket program.
* The Weimar-era Communist Party of Germany is often painted as wholly complicit in Hitler's rise due to their refusal to work with the Social Democratic Party in forming a coalition against the Nazi Party, with the KPD being painted as ether self-righteous Stalinists slavishly obeying Moscow's dictates that social democrats were just another form of fascism or reckless accelerationists who thought that Hitler's regime would usher in a Communist revolution. While the Stalinist and accelerationist parts are true, and the communists were a major reason for Hitler's seizure of power, they were hardly the only ones to blame. There were many other factions that also played a key role in facilitating the rise of the Nazis (the majority of the parties in the Reichstag supported the Enabling Act, and it was a right-wing politician, Franz von Papen, who thought Hitler could be controlled by the political establishment in the first place). It also ignores the reasons aside from accelerationism and dictates from the Soviet Union for the commies' refusal to work with the social democrats. There was significant bad blood between the two parties, dating back to the German Revolution of 1918-19 when the social democrats sided against the communists.
[[/folder]]
[[folder:Common Cases]]
* At least in the US, Benedict Arnold, who is considered a vile, cowardly traitor, but started out as a very capable American commander during UsefulNotes/TheAmericanRevolution. However, he had made himself powerful enemies (many of whom were in Congress) during the war, and it all ended when they managed to convince Congress and the upper brass that he would not deserve or need any of the promotions or additional wages for his military service (while he deserved them, there was often ''not enough money'' that the government could spare). To evade dishonorable consequences, he even attempted to resign, which [[UsefulNotes/GeorgeWashington Washington]] [[ResignationsNotAccepted rejected]]. In retaliation, he tried to sell the fort at West Point to the British, and now monuments that would depict him as a hero in the US only depict his ''boot'', the foot that was injured in a major battle he had fought for America.[[note]]At the time, after having credit for the victory stolen by his commanding officer who had done much less than Arnold to win it, he's said to have wished that the bullet had struck his heart instead. Had that actually happened, it's likely that Benedict Arnold would been remembered as a great martyr of the revolution rather than as the US equivalent of Judas Iscariot.[[/note]] It's worth noting that the British he defected to despised him as well, both because they did not at all respect traitors (even ones helping their side) and because he was apparently a massive JerkAss on a personal level that was an absolute chore to deal with. Him botching the commands he was given didn't help.
* La Malinche, a Nahua woman who had an affair with UsefulNotes/HernanCortez and helped him in his conquest of the Aztec Empire, is seen by many in contemporary Mexico as a traitor for helping the Conquistadors to subjugate "her people." Often unmentioned and downplayed are that (a) before she met Cortés she was a slave — her stepmother [[MadeASlave sold her into slavery]] in childhood, whereas Cortés [[BecauseYouWereNiceToMe trusted her and financially supported her after the conquest]], and (b) she wasn’t even an Aztec — she came from a town called Paynala before she was sold into slavery in another town. So she can't accurately be classified as a traitor — and in fact the Aztec Empire was vehemently hated among the other tribes and towns in Mexico. Cortés won these people over very easily, and it seems a bit unfair to condemn La Malinche for siding with him and others of her own people [[CategoryTraitor against the people who enslaved her]].
* One of the best-known examples is the composer Antonio Salieri, contemporary to Music/WolfgangAmadeusMozart. History records that he was Mozart's (and Music/LudwigVanBeethoven's) friend and collaborator, and also a mentor to Mozart's youngest son Franz. Various works of fiction, [[OlderThanTheyThink going back at least to the mid-19th century]], portray him as Mozart's ArchEnemy and secret murderer. The most famous example is the play ''Theatre/{{Amadeus}}'' by Peter Shaffer, which was adapted into a multiple-Oscar-winning film. While Salieri might not have been ''quite'' [[OvershadowedByAwesome as good as Mozart]] by most reckoning, he was still a fantastic composer. The basis for viewing Mozart and Salieri as enemies comes from a few letters by Wolfgang and his father that gripe about Salieri receiving a desirable commission, though this is only natural for professionals competing for the same business. It's also at odds with the fictional version, which has Salieri as TheResenter toward Mozart, who is oblivious to Salieri's ill-will toward him. The reason why Salieri was vilified was basically Italophobic German nationalism, who wanted to promote German musicians as greater than Italians like Salieri and others.[[note]]Ironically, while Salieri was born in Italy, he was trained and lived much of his life in Austria and his music was heavily influenced by Germans. And the Austrian-born Mozart was deeply influenced by Italian orchestral and operatic style. Music rarely respects national boundaries, no matter what the nationalists wanted to believe.[[/note]]
* The historical and legendary figure Ja'far ibn Yahya al-Barmaki, vizier to Harun al-Rashid, hasn't been given a Historical Villain Upgrade ''exactly'' ... but try finding an evil vizier in a story set in ArabianNightsDays whose name ''isn't'' some spelling of [[UsefulNotes/GrandVizierJafar Jafar]]. Likely more due to sloppy research. The cartoon character ComicBook/{{Iznogoud}} could be considered a Historical Villain Upgrade of Ja'far. More generally, the position of vizier itself has had something of a historical villain upgrade, to the point that it even has its [[EvilChancellor own trope]]. While there have certainly been plenty of examples of scheming and traitors among top advisers, most people who have held such trusted positions did so because they were, in fact, [[TheGoodChancellor trustworthy]].
* UsefulNotes/RasputinTheMadMonk is generally considered nowadays as a relatively harmless (if highly sleazy) eccentric religious figure, but during his life he was thought to hold the imperial family in thrall via strange supernatural powers.[[note]]This was more of a polite fiction among the aristocracy, as it allowed them to shift the blame onto him for all the bad decisions made by Nicholas II, who could not be criticized directly.[[/note]] Therefore, most media depict him as a raving madman at best, an EvilSorcerer at worst. The fact that he was apocryphally [[RasputinianDeath described as supernaturally resilient]] didn't help his reputation either. [[note]]We say "apocryphally" because the original account of his murder was written by Prince Felix Yusupov, who supposedly organized the assassination; it was reputed even back in the day to be deliberately inaccurate (and allgedly changed whenever Yusupov was short on funds), but it's the one everyone remembers.[[/note]] In movies, games, and TV shows, he's presented as a kind of EvilSorceror (''WesternAnimation/{{Anastasia}}''); in the Franchise/MarvelUniverse, Rasputin was a mutant; etc.
* UsefulNotes/KingJohnOfEngland, villain of the ''Myth/RobinHood'' stories. While John certainly deserved some of his reputation (he was a [[GeneralFailure bad general]] and very good at alienating the nobility), he was far from the craven usurper depicted in the later legends. While he didn't have the ''only'' valid claim on the throne, his claim was hardly weak. He also wasn't an illiterate lackwit, as some popular folklore depicts him, having written many books on law and being considered one of the premier legal minds of his age, so much so that his judgement had often been sought prior to his kingship in regards to legal disputes. He is also recognized as the founder of the modern British navy. There's also the fact that he is popularly OvershadowedByAwesome relative to his brother, UsefulNotes/RichardTheLionheart, who came to be seen as a hero after his death, on account of his martial prowess never mind his much-criticized warmongering which led him to burn through the English treasury, which basically left John a mess of a kingdom. This is why there was such disdain for John negotiating with King Phillip II of France instead of defeating him on the battlefield like it was presumed Richard would've done. John was a mediocrity and since his reign led to the Magna Carta, he obviously came to be the DesignatedVillain, i.e. the weak king that led to expansion of Parliamentary rights. But he was not the worst king nor the most tyrannical.
* UsefulNotes/RichardIII. He didn't betray his elder brother Edward. He might or might not have murdered any of his family members. He definitely wasn't nearly as [[RedRightHand deformed]] as he's generally portrayed (though exhumation of his skeleton in 2013 revealed pronounced scoliosis, so his hunchback wasn't a complete fabrication). Who really killed his young nephews, the "Princes in the Tower," is unclear -- Richard definitely kept them in a GildedCage before their disappearance, and had them declared illegitimate in order to claim the throne, and they disappeared forever nearly two years before Richard was killed at Bosworth, but the details of their deaths remain a mystery.
** The main culprit for Richard's smear campaign is Creator/WilliamShakespeare's [[Theatre/RichardIII play]] about him, which was written over 100 years after his death and was basically created for the benefit of the direct descendant of the guy who overthrew him -- Shakespeare based his play off a published 'history' that was written by one of Richard's deadliest enemies, who was then made Bishop of Canterbury after Richard's death by Henry Tudor.
** Notably averted by the University of York, where a popular legend credits him as the first person to propose establishing a university in York. The first formal proposal that we know of came during the reign of [[UsefulNotes/TheHouseOfStuart James I]] over a century after Richard's death, and the university itself [[SavedFromDevelopmentHell opened in 1963]]; still, Richard's ties to York at least make the legend plausible.
** Most historians also stress his incredible legal reforms during his time at the Council of the North and furthermore his very active monarchy which in its brief rule, passed far more legal statutes than King Edward IV and led to the poor being given the right of bail.
* [[UsefulNotes/TheHouseOfHanover George III]] of Great Britain is popularly remembered by Americans as a tyrant, mostly due to the way he was portrayed by pro-independence propaganda. In reality, he had virtually nothing to do with the policies that so annoyed the colonists, but as the sovereign, he received all the blame. As a king, he is actually deemed by history as a rather good one, at least before he lost his mind in his later years. Personally, he had little interest in politics, preferring agriculture and tea. When he met the first American minister to Britain, UsefulNotes/JohnAdams, he stated that he was "the last to consent" to independence, but wished the US well as an independent country and hoped Britain and the US would get along in the future.
* China's first emperor UsefulNotes/QinShiHuangdi gets this a lot, owing to his historical reputation as a brutal tyrant ([[RepressiveButEfficient albeit an effective one]]). He's the BigBad in ''Literature/BridgeOfBirds'', in which he is also immortal and has magic powers. His {{Expy}} in ''VideoGame/WorldOfWarcraft'', Emperor Lei Shen, fares no better, given [[ShockAndAwe demonic lightning powers]] and [[ANaziByAnyOtherName Nazi-style racial theories]] to make him look more evil. Additionally, the Emperor in the film ''Film/{{Hero}}'' is based on him, and is sort of an uneasy mix between this trope and HistoricalHeroUpgrade- he wins, and many thought the film had the odd lesson of "an imperfect government is better than civil war."
* While [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Empress_Dowager_Cixi Empress Dowager Cixi]] is ''hardly'' a saint, the traditional view of her is of an EvilMatriarch thanks to the media. [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Empress_Dowager_Cixi#Historical_opinions There's still a lot of debate]] on how much of this is true and how much of this came from Chinese politics using her image as a scapegoat: more than one biographer depicts her as an IronLady who could be very cruel or selfish at one moment (like amassing a huge personal fortune in times when ImperialChina was falling down, and being the number 1 suspect behind her nephew's death by poisoning) and very kind at the other (like thanking a nurse who took care of her when she was ill by releasing her from [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foot_binding footbinding]] and making sure she healed completely).
* In films and other works featuring [[UsefulNotes/MaryOfScotland Mary, Queen of Scots]], UsefulNotes/ElizabethI gets this treatment. If the film is about Elizabeth, Mary, Queen of Scots, Mary Tudor, and/or Philip II of Spain will be treated this way.
** ''Queen Elizabeth: The Golden Age'' [[AmericansHateTingle bombed in Spain]] precisely because of this trope. Spanish audiences were insulted with its depiction of Philip II (a remarkably pious man) as -- quoting one critic -- "a cackling, Spanish Doctor Doom." And its prequel, ''Film/{{Elizabeth}}'', certainly followed the formula insofar as both her sister Mary and the Catholic Church at large were concerned.
** This trend stretches back to Schiller's play ''Mary Stuart'' (1800) and even earlier.
** The 1940 German film ''Das Herz der Königin'' ("The Heart of the Queen"), viewed by many critics as an anti-British propaganda movie, portrays Mary (Zarah Leander) as a beautiful saintly martyr (she sings, too), while Elizabeth is a bitter malicious dried up spinster who will stop at nothing to make her cousin miserable and eventually murder her.
** The BBC miniseries ''Gunpowder, Treason, and Plot'' treated Mary far more sympathetically than Elizabeth. Ironically, it portrayed James I, the main character, as quite a JerkAss.[[note]]Depicting James I as a JerkAss, however, may be more TruthInTelevision than it is this trope. Still, Creator/JohnDonne seems to have thought well of him.[[/note]]
* Elizabeth's mother, UsefulNotes/AnneBoleyn, also tends to get hit with this a lot. While she certainly had a temper and was capable of holding a grudge, everyone near-universally agrees that she wasn't guilty of the charges of treason, incest and adultery at her trial.
* Thomas Cromwell is another convenient Tudor villain for carrying out some of UsefulNotes/HenryVIII's more tyrannical acts, such as the execution of Anne Boleyn and the Dissolution of the Monasteries -- at best he was portrayed as an amoral YesMan, at worst outright evil. He's been given more nuanced media portrayals in the 21st century (most famously in ''Literature/WolfHall''). This might be due to ValuesDissonance as the narrative of an intelligent SelfMadeMan garners much more interest than it used to.
* Mary I, better known as Bloody Mary, older sister of Elizabeth, gets this near universally (her nickname reflects that). However, though her government did burn a number of Protestants for heresy, it was no worse than what Elizabeth did to Catholics. This included being [[CruelAndUnusualDeath hanged, drawn and quartered]] for the "crime" of harboring a priest, or being a priest oneself and administering the sacraments to closet Catholics in the country. It was also a crime to not attend Anglican services if you were a Catholic (although that would only get a fine). Mary's crimes were commemorated by [[WrittenByTheWinners later Protestant works]], such as Foxe's ''Book of Martyrs''. They did not care about (or outright approved of) Catholic persecution by Elizabeth. At the time, no one had the concept of religious freedom except for a tiny radical minority. Further, while Mary did restore Catholicism, she did not reverse all of her father's (Henry VIII) reforms, recognizing the reality of the situation, making English Catholicism its own religion.
* The Spanish Empire as a whole gets into this in Anglophone media, if you see the Cross of Burgundy in a film that does not have the characters in question being Spanish themselves then nine out of ten those characters are villains who are either bigoted zealots or avaricious brutes. This, of course, was the result of the Spanish Empire being so powerful both in Europe and overseas and with so many enemies in various fronts (the Dutch, the French, the English, the many, many Protestant German princes) that it was often subject to slander and evil propaganda, the Spanish have a term for this: La Leyenda Negra (The Black Legend). The actions of some of the conquistadores were indeed truly horrendous towards the indigenous population, but people often forget two things: (a) the Spanish monarchs were pissed off at these atrocities enough to send armies to get the conquistadors in line and gave legal protection and equal rights to the Amerindians as a Spaniard in Spain once the vice-royalties were established (much more than what happened in the Thirteen colonies), (b) the disastrous depopulation of the American natives was more the product of disease than war casualties or the abuses of colonial authorities.
** Despite its infamy, UsefulNotes/TheSpanishInquisition actually killed remarkably few people. The latest archival research suggests about 3,000 executions over the course of over 300 years. This was partly because the standard of proof required to convict someone was actually very high, and innocence was usually presumed. While killing people because of their religious beliefs is undoubtedly bad, Spain had among the ''lowest'' amounts of religious violence; witchcraft executions in the rest of Europe alone utterly dwarfed the Inquisition's death toll by orders of magnitude,[[note]][[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Witch-hunt#Execution_statistics There were roughly]] 30,000 executions for witchcraft in greater Germany during the same time period, as opposed to less than 1,000 for ''all'' of Southern Europe, of which only a minority were in Spain.[[/note]] much less the big meaty events like the French Wars of Religion. Other CommonKnowledge about the Inquisition (that they burned books, that the ''auto de fe'' involved torture rather than simply being a public penance, that people were burned for being witches, that final authority rested with inquisitors rather than the secular government) is simply from the realm of pure fantasy. Again, its reputation is more the result of English and Dutch media dominance (the two countries were bitter rivals of Spain in the early modern period) than anything real.
* UsefulNotes/LouisXVI of France (king during UsefulNotes/TheFrenchRevolution) is generally seen as either a tyrant or an oaf, and few media will ever depict him as anything else. His actual problem was that he was [[TheDitherer too weak and indecisive]] a ruler, while a stronger one might have been able to prevent the revolution, or at least the worst of it. Louis XVI's actual policies, which include positive and enlightened measures (e.g. in favor of Jews in the Alsace region and of potato-farming) and military and political successes (victory over the old enemy across the Channel in [[UsefulNotes/TheAmericanRevolution the War of American Independence]]) also tend to be forgotten. Even in America, where if France's role is acknowledged at all, it gets credited entirely to the Marquis de Lafayette.
* On the other side of the coin, the French Revolutionaries as a whole frequently get this treatment, especially UsefulNotes/MaximilienRobespierre, who eventually came to be seen as proto-[[UsefulNotes/VladimirLenin Lenin]] and -[[UsefulNotes/JosefStalin Stalin]]. Critics of this depiction point out that he was a man of great personal integrity, to the point of being described as ''L'Incorruptible'' and that he had in fact argued against the War with Austria that escalated the Revolution and made France a target of invasion. He had initially opposed the death penalty. He was loved in his lifetime as a champion of the poor and the working class and did much to clear out the corruption in the military and society, and furthermore alongside the Committee of Public Safety and the National Convention, he also participated in the 1794 Decree to outright abolish slavery by law and dispatched agents to the Caribbean to enforce it, and moved against pro-slavery lobbyists, ordering several of their arrests. Even critics of the ReignOfTerror point out that Robespierre justified it as a wartime necessity only and in fact tried to moderate the excesses of the very people who later stabbed him in the back and guillotined him.
* There are several conspiracy theories surrounding the {{Illuminati}}, who are often portrayed as a group trying to take over the world and create a Big Brother-style {{dystopia}}. However, in their time (end of the 18th century, not before, not later), they weren't too different from your regular BrotherhoodOfFunnyHats. Their New World Order was in fact referring to a republican government and laws based on fundamental human rights (think of the French Revolution). Indeed, this is how the conspiracy theories on them got started: in 1798 a royalist wrote a book blaming the French Revolution on Freemasons and the Illuminati, which then grew steadily over the years.
* The entire Rothschild family often gets this. In various media, works of fiction, and ''especially'' conspiracy theories (and not just anti-Semitic ones), they are portrayed as [[BigBad the leaders of]] TheIlluminati or some equally sinister AncientConspiracy with plans to either TakeOverTheWorld [[OneWorldGovernment by establishing a tyrannical New World Order]] or to kill huge numbers of people and reduce the world's population to less than a billion debt slaves either out of greed or just ForTheEvulz. This is seen in the short film ''The American Dream'' which portrays the Rothschilds (referred to as red-shields) as [[EldritchAbomination tentacled horrors]] ruining the economies of America and England through wars, central banking and the Federal Reserve either to satisfy their avarice or just because.
* In the same vein, 19th-century Freemason Albert Pike also gets this. In real life he isn't really well known outside of Freemasonry circles, but once again works of fiction and conspiracy theories portray him as the man who planned and engineered the concepts for the two world wars and a apocalyptic third one-all in the 1870s, all of wars which will bring about a [[ReligionOfEvil Satanic One World Empire]], all of these plans being recorded in a letter. The reality is that the letter was forged from an unknown source, through hoaxer Leo Taxil is the most probable culprit.
* As alluded to in the Literature section, almost any adaptation of ''Literature/TheThreeMusketeers'' will dump the original novel's moral ambiguities and do this to poor Cardinal Richelieu.
* The [[Literature/TheBountyTrilogy 1932 novelization]] of the mutiny on the HMAV ''Bounty'', and the [[Film/MutinyOnTheBounty 1935]] and [[Film/MutinyOnTheBounty1962 1962]] film adaptions, depict Captain William Bligh[[note]]His rank at the time wasn't even Captain, but Lieutenant.[[/note]] as a ruthless autocrat. Among other things, he is variously shown to have keelhauled a man, flogged a man to death, deprived his men of water until they succumb to dehydration, etc., none of which occurred in reality. Indeed, most who served under him regarded him as rather tame in terms of actual punishment, and a comparison to other contemporary captains seems to support this. For the most part, he seems to have been guilty of nothing more than arrogance, frequent shouting, and giving conflicting orders, much to his crew's frustration. For his day, he would have been considered fairly strict, but fair, and not as strict as he ''could'' have been. Modern historians place the blame more on the crew's long vacation in the tropics, causing them to become overly sensitive to discipline; a lesser emphasis is placed on his tendency towards relentless micromanagement and acerbic wit. The 1984 film ''Film/TheBounty'' takes a revisionist and more historically accurate view of Bligh, depicting [[GrayAndGrayMorality both his good and bad points]], along with the part most depictions completely omit: his almost 4,000-mile long voyage to safely reach Timor in the boat he and the loyal crewman were set adrift on, a remarkable feat by any standard.
* The serial killer called UsefulNotes/JackTheRipper (assuming he was only one person and was indeed a "he", and that the murders were even related at all) was never identified, and only committed five murders. They were tragic, of course, but there were far worse serial killers both before and since then, so much that a case like this would hardly get any attention in modern times. Still, the fact that the brutal murders were never solved make people depict him as the worst SerialKiller in history, and the case is a favorite among fiction writers, who often tend to portray him as far more than any mortal man in their depictions. (For specific examples, see his own Trope page.)
* Kenesaw Mountain Landis, first Commissioner of Baseball. Firstly for the allegation that he had dealt with the Black Sox scandal in a ham-handed and unfair manner (aided by pro-Black Sox portrayals in films like ''Film/EightMenOut'' or ''Film/FieldOfDreams''), with the greatest scorn coming for his treatment of "Shoeless" Joe Jackson (who indeed participated in the fix, took money for it, and kept his teammates' actions secret). This ignores how hated the participating players in the Scandal were at the time, and the implications the scandal held for all of baseball. Secondly, it's often been claimed that Landis was the sole reason for baseball's "color barrier", even to the extent of claiming the Ohio-born-and-raised Landis was an old-school Southern racist. Landis himself stated that the question was up to the owners (most of whom at the time were against integration), and invited black sports reporters to make their case to them. There was also the rather important (up until Branch Rickey said "screw it," and all the other owners followed suit) question of what compensation would be due to Negro League teams in exchange for drafting all their best players; the Negro League teams were profitable business entities in their own right and at the time of integration were predominately owned by African Americans.
* ''UsefulNotes/RMSTitanic'':
** The relatively blameless [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bruce_Ismay J. Bruce Ismay]], the president of the shipping lane, is often portrayed as an arrogant, bullying prick who forces Captain Smith to run the ship full speed into an ice field and then act like a [[DirtyCoward sniveling coward]] who hops aboard the first available lifeboat. While it's perhaps easy to see where this reputation comes from -- jumping into a lifeboat to save yourself while there's still hundreds of women and children aboard the ship is perhaps not going to cast you in the bravest or manliest of lights -- the truth is a bit more complicated, with eyewitness accounts suggesting Ismay was diligent in helping load and lower the lifeboats and only took his seat in one after making sure that there were no women or children there to take it instead. There is also absolutely no evidence Ismay had any influence over Captain Smith's operation of the ship and he had no reasons for the ship to arrive in New York faster than scheduled, seeing that ''Titanic'' would not beat any speed records even if it crossed the ocean a day faster. It seems that he was simply a scapegoat for the general public, who were desperate to make sense of the tragedy and [[ConvictedByPublicOpinion find a villain]] as a way to get catharsis - and Ismay, as the highest-ranked person to escape the sinking alive, was the obvious choice.
** The entire staff and crew of the ''Titanic'' tend to get this with respect to how the Third Class passengers were treated. One is unlikely to learn in a fictional treatment of the disaster that Third Class accommodations aboard White Star's ships in general and ''Titanic'' in particular were well above average for the time, including their own set of cooks to prepare food and stewards to serve it. It is also not true that the officers loading the lifeboats were biased in favor of First Class passengers. Rather, the reason that Third Class passengers took proportionately higher casualties is because their cabins were the farthest from the lifeboats and many got lost in the corridors below deck, and even with this fact Third Class women were much more likely to survive than First Class men. Some adaptations, including the Creator/JamesCameron [[Film/Titanic1997 version]], portray the Stewards deliberately locking Third Class passengers below deck to prevent stampeding, which also probably never happened; the gates did exist, but due to health and immigration laws at the time requiring Third Class to be separated from First and Second. These gates could be opened in case of emergency, and never directly barred the way to the main deck, but in their panic the Stewards forgot to open most of them.
* UsefulNotes/LizzieBorden, who was tried -- and ''acquitted'' -- of murdering her father and stepmother in 1892, is almost universally demonized in the media, where she tends to be portrayed as an unhinged psychopath. In truth, this perception of her was due to the brutal nature of the crime itself, ostracism from her community, and the intense media attention given to it. While her guilt or innocence continues to be debated, she definitely was not on the same level as most other notorious killers. Her motive, if guilty, apparently stemmed from a family dispute. Also, few people remember that Lizzie was an avid animal lover all her life and upon her death left most of her estate to a local animal shelter.
* UsefulNotes/RichardNixon is an unusual example -- he gets this treatment in many, many works but rarely ones that deal directly with his original term of office. We say "original" because the upgrade tends to occur in BadFuture alternate timelines where America has become a {{Dystopia}} (such as ComicBook/{{Watchmen}} or ''Film/BackToTheFuturePartII''). We know they are dystopias because one of the features is that Nixon is still President, usually on his totally unconstitutional third, fourth or fifth term, implying he's running a ''[[PresidentForLife de facto]]'' dictatorship. While he's rarely the BigBad of these settings (in fact he's usually TheGhost), it still fits this trope that the writers thought that Nixon would a) so much as attempt something like this, and b) use his Presidency as further evidence that the setting is a CrapsackWorld (they ''are'' Crapsack, of course; its just a bit much to think that Nixon is one of the main reasons for it). PlayedForLaughs in ''WesternAnimation/{{Futurama}}'' where in the distant future he's a [[BrainInAJar Head in a Jar]] LargeHam CardCarryingVillain (and once again, President, though this time via LoopholeAbuse rather than outright corruption).
** Averted, for once in ''Film/XMenDaysOfFuturePast'', in spite of common portrayals in fiction relaying the public opinion of him after [[NeverLiveItDown the Watergate scandal]]. He treats the growth of the mutant population as another issue to solve as Commander-In-Chief instead of resorting to FantasticRacism, and [[spoiler:chooses to discontinue the Sentinel program after a few mutants prevent his death at the hands of Magneto]].
* UsefulNotes/OdaNobunaga has basically become Japan's go-to guy whenever a series needs an EvilOverlord. While Nobunaga was clearly not a very nice man in RealLife, it is very unlikely that he was ever [[DemonKingNobunaga literally the king of Hell]] like many series like to claim. Indeed, he knew that uniting Japan would benefit the people; he didn't particularly ''care'', but he knew. In that sense, he's a good deal like UsefulNotes/OttoVonBismarck--and the only things that people ever bring up about Bismarck are his genius and cunning. He may have been a ruthless badass during his lifetime even among the already vicious Lords of Japan, but modern works tend to take this to ridiculous (and often evil) extremes.
** Many of his positive actions include tolerating Christians, open borders, modernizing the military and generally attempting to kick start a Japanese Renaissance. Though all of that can be filed under PragmaticVillainy -- tolerating Christians meant he could buy rifles from them, open borders enabled him to hire foreign mercenaries, modernizing his military is self-explanatory, as is his desire for a modern empire rather than a pre-Renaissance one. And while by modern standards these are seen as good things, at the time they were hated by many Japanese traditionalists.
** Almost all depictions of Oda Nobunaga tend to gloss over or be vague about why specific conflicts involving him started. For example, it's pretty inconvenient for Nobunaga's villain status to point out that Asakura-Asai conflict was started because Ashikaga Yoshiaki, whom Nobunaga has just aided to become shogun and was keeping in power, formed a secret anti-Oda alliance with the Asakura with the intention of launching a sneak attack because Yoshiaki realized Nobunaga knew he was the only thing keeping Yoshiaki in power and was more than willing to use that to his advantage when dealing with him. While Asai Nagamasa's aid of the Asakura is portrayed as being done out of a sense of duty, he was in favor of remaining neutral. It is generally accepted that his aid of the Asakura was the result of advice he received indicating the Oda were almost certain to lose and the Asai were trying to be on the winning side. Even with the worst historical portrayal of Nobunaga, there was more going on than his villainous portrayals generally show.
* UsefulNotes/AmakusaShiro joins Nobunaga in villainous portrayals in Japanese media, albeit with the caveat that he's usually depicted as [[FallenHero a once noble person]] [[DealWithTheDevil who sold his soul to the devil]] for {{revenge}} [[DespairEventHorizon in his dying moment.]]
** An exception is the {{josei}} manga Manga/{{Amakusa 1637}}, where Shirou somehow managed [[IncorruptiblePurePureness to remain kind and untarnished]] despite [[BreakTheCutie the horribly raw deal he got]]. [[spoiler: Because he was TooGoodForThisSinfulEarth.]]
* [[UsefulNotes/YagyuJubei Yagyu Munenori]] ranks up there along with Amakusa and Nobunaga in terms of being vilified in Japan. In general, he is an excellent swordsman as well as a shrewd politician. However, he's also a guy who dedicated his life and sword to protect others, he even wrote a book titled "Life-Giving Sword" to further boost that. Since politicians are often turned into AcceptableTargets and his son Mitsuyoshi is often romanticized as someone who disdains politics, Munenori is often turned into an antagonistic evil swordsman AND SleazyPolitician that was the cause of Mitsuyoshi losing an eye or also portrayed as an EvilCounterpart to UsefulNotes/MiyamotoMusashi, another romanticized MasterSwordsman (the two never met). This is an often widespread trope usage on Munenori. Kind of hard being a politician and a father of a folk hero who's thought to be anti-politics (even if Mitsuyoshi eventually returned to political stage after being kicked out).
* American Commodore Matthew C. Perry is famously remembered for making the then-isolationist Japan open its ports for trade to all of the West, but his negotiation tactics weren't so nice: his threats of using his "Black Ships" to reduce the then-capitol Edo to ashes was what coined the term "Gunboat Diplomacy". While it's likely his threats were just chest-puffing and his only real intention was to start trade between Japan and America, it ''definitely'' worked at scaring the Japanese: a fear that persists even to this day, as most Japan-produced media portray Perry as a violent megalomaniac who sought to outright conquer Japan--if not [[TakeOverTheWorld the entire world as well]].
* UsefulNotes/TokugawaIeyasu is usually portrayed to be less evil than Nobunaga, but there was a time when his once strong Shogunate that ruled Japan for 200 years or so while isolating the country from outer world grew weaker in power and then the American ships under the aforementioned Perry came, forcing Japan to open its border and then a chain of events led to the Meiji Restoration where Japan enjoyed advances in technology and research much better than the times of Tokugawa's isolationist policy. Thanks to this, the Tokugawa shogunate (not just Ieyasu himself) is often villified as a group of {{Obstructive Bureaucrat}}s that was only interested in personal power and ruling Japan with iron fist, making people suffer. Former oppositions of Ieyasu especially during the late UsefulNotes/SengokuPeriod, especially UsefulNotes/SanadaYukimura and UsefulNotes/IshidaMitsunari, [[HistoricalHeroUpgrade tend to be upgraded into tragic folk heroes status]], trying to prevent the rise to power of Ieyasu, usually seen as [[SmugSnake a shifty, dastardly raccoon]], only to be tragically thwarted by his dastardly cunningness, and it didn't help that the biggest figures of Meiji Restoration originated from the regions that got the short end of the stick after the Battle of Sekigahara due to Ieyasu's machinations, so the anti-Tokugawa propaganda worked for their favor.
* [[HornyVikings The Norse]] and other Germanic tribesmen tend to suffer from this, with the media often depicting them as brutish, bloodthirsty and violent raiders, plunderers and killers. Sometimes even in media in which they're meant to be the ''protagonists''! In reality, they were no more savage or prone to violence than any other people at the time, with a very sophisticated culture. Most media fails to acknowledge that the "Vikings" are not even a culture of their own, but a specific profession (that is, {{pirate}}s -- which is roughly what "Viking" in Old Norse actually means -- although since pirates were typically "brutish, bloodthirsty and violent raiders, plunderers and killers" anyway, the depiction of the Viking raiders themselves is not too far off), while the Norse people they were a part of were in some ways ''more'' advanced culturally than their European contemporaries -- if nothing else, they had better hygiene than other Europeans and women were closer to formal equality with men in their society.
* This is a common tendency when depicting some of the more notorious emperors in Roman history. This isn't helped by the fact that histories of the Roman Emperors were often [[WrittenByTheWinners written by their critics once they were dead]] -- some of them decades, if not centuries after the fact -- who had no compunction against simply inventing negative stories about them.
** Emperor UsefulNotes/{{Caligula}} gets this a lot, even on [[TheCaligula this very wiki]]. Most sources agree that he was a terrible emperor (although modern historians have come to question how much of this is true and how much was exaggerated or outright made up). However, most sources ''also'' agree that he was actually very good emperor in the first six months or so of his reign, and that he then went insane. Philo of Alexandria, for example, claimed that he became mad after nearly dying of a serious illness in the eighth month of his reign, leading modern historians to speculate that he may have suffered brain damage as a result of a prolonged high fever. In short, while he may have indeed done bad things, not all of the horrible stories about him may actually be true, and his heel-turn was probably not entirely his fault.
** Emperor UsefulNotes/{{Nero}} has a reputation for, at best, playing the lyre during the Great Fire of Rome, or, at worst, setting the city on fire deliberately. In fact, the most reliable source on the fire, Tacitus, states that Nero hurried back to the city to oversee the relief efforts, paying out of his own pockets quite generously. Although his actions immediately following this (taking advantage of the situation by clearing out 100-300 acres of the burnt-out city to built his lavish ''Domus Aurea'', which also likely fueled the rumors that he was responsible for the fire), quickly extinguished whatever good will he earned from this gesture. It's generally regarded by historians that much of Nero's reputation as a monster comes from his having favored the common people and having disdain for the aristocracy, which didn't sit well with the aristocrats who wrote all the historical accounts since the common people tended to be illiterate. What really didn't help his reputation is that he was the first Roman Emperor to persecute Christians; after Christianity became Rome's dominant religion, his reputation as a tyrannical madman was effectively sealed.
** To a lesser extent, UsefulNotes/{{Augustus}} is also at the receiving end of this in some works. They tend to play up his perceived cowardice (which he earned due to his frequent bouts of sickness forcing him to not participate in battles), sociopathy, and keen skill in manipulating people. Common historical consensus on the man agrees that he was an extremely ambitious man with a mind for politics over warfare (which is no slight against him as Roman politics were a jungle of conspiracies, corruption, and assassinations), was very loyal to those who chose to side with him (as seen with his long relationship with Marcus Agrippa), managed to drag Rome out of decades of civil war and turn it into an empire which lasted for five centuries, and was capable of both extreme acts of leniency and stunning acts of cruelty to make it happen. While many consider him the man who "killed" the Roman Republic, the reality is that the republic had been effectively dead for decades due to the erosion of political norms both causing severe instability and enabling a parade of strongmen to amass enormous power for themselves. Especially notable here are works focused on Augustus' (then still known as Octavian) ally turned political nemesis, Marc Antony, who in real life was in fact by far the more brutal of the two.
** Emperor Commodus almost certainly did not assassinate his father, Marcus Aurelius, to become Emperor: most evidence points to the Antonine plague doing him in, and there's no evidence that Aurelius intended for anyone else to succeed him. He was certainly a terrible emperor as well, but claims that he single-handedly ended the Pax Romana and was the cause of the Empire's eventual destruction is also an exaggeration: he certainly accelerated the decline, but the growing conglomeration of Germanic tribes to the north, Rome being ravaged by the aforementioned plague, and economic meltdowns caused by hyper-inflation are also to blame, all of which happened without Commodus' involvement. Even a second Marcus Aurelius or Trajan would've been hard-pressed to counter those trends.
* Speaking of the Ancient Romans, they also play host to another common upgrade that's not given to a person or a group, but a concept: ''paterfamilias'', which gave a Roman father absolute authority over his children, including the right to kill them. While obviously extremely harsh by modern standards, this principle has given rise to the portrayal of Roman fathers in modern media as cruel tyrants over their families who brutalize their children for minor imperfections. The consensus among actual historians is the far less lurid story that the overwhelming majority of Roman dads loved their kids just as much as parents from any other culture did, and the invocation of the more extreme tenets of ''paterfamilias'' was likely extremely rare, and typically done only in the case of the child committing a serious crime such as themselves murdering a family member.
* Early-20th-century cult leader Creator/AleisterCrowley was certainly a controversial figure, but he was clearly ''not'' into HollywoodSatanism, did not have [[ReligionIsMagic magical powers,]] didn't fit the AristocratsAreEvil Trope (even if he was evil, he was not an aristocrat) and wasn't a [[OurVampiresAreDifferent vampire]], contrary to works by people like Creator/AlanMoore, Creator/GrantMorrison, and many others, mostly in comic books.
* Porfirio Díaz is best remembered as a {{hypocrite}} who [[FullCircleRevolution championed liberalism in the early years of his political career and then became a dictator]]. After UsefulNotes/TheMexicanRevolution, some Mexicans even began to depict him as evil incarnate, spreading stories like the one that as a boy he maliciously set his brother on fire. In truth, while Díaz did become an authoritarian, he consistently tried to govern benevolently. Earlier on in his administration, he was a very effective leader, breaking the power of Mexico's infamous brigands that were a plague on travelers and setting up the country's infrastructure so it would benefit the nation for years to come. The problems that started later on were largely a result of him going senile and being increasingly SurroundedByIdiots and [[YesMan yes-men]]. His main flaw was that he had CondescendingCompassion for the lower classes. He's also remembered for his alleged snobbery and [[BoomerangBigot self-hating racism]] in powdering his face to appear more white; while the face-powdering may or may not be true, there is no evidence that Díaz ever tried to hide or had anything but pride in his mestizo heritage.
* William Tecumseh Sherman is frequently remembered as a war criminal who devastated the American South -- particularly Georgia. However, while it's true that he attacked civilian supplies and infrastructure, the damage he did was almost entirely limited to property. The number of civilians killed by his army was vanishingly small. Sherman's objective was to end UsefulNotes/TheAmericanCivilWar as quickly as possible by attacking the Confederacy's morale and economic assets, not wantonly slaughter Southerners. While there are legitimate reasons his total war was and is so controversial, he was a far cry from the mass murderer many remember him as. Though this perception is most common the South, as other parts of the country often consider him a hero [[IDidWhatIHadToDo doing what needed to be done]], especially after the [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning_School Dunning School]] fell out of favor.
* Recent portrayals of UsefulNotes/ThomasJefferson often play up his elitism and racist hypocrisy for claiming that "all men are equal" while being a wealthy slaveowner. While Jefferson viewed non-whites as inferior people, he held relatively egalitarian views, [[FairForItsDay at least by the standards of early America]]. As president, Jefferson ended the Atlantic slave trade and drafted plans to restrict and eventually abolished slavery. While he owned slaves, nearly all of the Founding Fathers supported the practice, and Jefferson was one of the few who tried to free his own slaves but was prevented by legal and financial restrictions. Jefferson also supported protection for religious minorities and the poor, which was opposed by many like Alexander Hamilton. Although he is considered every bit the PoliticallyIncorrectHero by modern standards, he genuinely tried to promote equality to a greater extent than many of his contemporaries.
* One that overlaps with HistoricalHeroUpgrade (of someone else) and AHeroToHisHometown: in America, UsefulNotes/HarrySTruman is viewed generically positively for the most part. In ''Russia'', on the other hand, he is given the whole blame for starting the Cold War even now, decades after it ended. It’s true that Stalin had wanted to keep the alliance after World War II and Truman was dead-set against it, but giving him the whole blame ignores [[PeoplesRepublicOfTyranny the reason why]] he didn’t trust Stalin. [[Administrivia/RuleOfCautiousEditingJudgment And that’s all that will be said.]]
* It is extremely common for far-left and anti-American circles to do this to the entirety of American history, portraying the Founding Fathers as violent slaveowners seeking to preserve slavery and commit mass genocide on Native Americans who only rebelled against Britain because the crown would not allow them to do either of these things and whose ideology of Manifest Destiny directly inspired the Nazis, while portraying WWII-era America as doing almost nothing to stop the Nazis when the Soviet Union was doing all the hard work, and even [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Paperclip recruited Nazis post-war to gain an advantage over the Soviets]]. While many of the Founders were slaveowners, Britain only abolished slavery in the 1830s, and it is entirely possible had the revolution not occured, the slaveowners in the Caribbean and the North American South could have formed a power bloc to deter abolitionist efforts in the forseeable future. Britain and it's colonies were [[NotSoDifferent no more benevolent]] towards indigenous peoples as well, if their treatment of Canadian and Australian natives were any indication. Furthermore, with regards to the inspiration Manifest Destiny had on Nazism, Hitler was not solely inspired by American Manifest Destiny, but was also inspired by British Imperialism, [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Herero_and_Namaqua_genocide#Link_between_the_Herero_genocide_and_the_Holocaust the genocides committed by the German Empire in Nambia]], and the Armenian genocide. With regards to World War II, while it was true that the Soviets played the bigger role in defeating the Nazis in Europe, America played a important role in facilitating their victory through Lend-Lease. The Americans were also not the only country to recruit Nazis post-war in preparations for the Cold War, the Soviets themselves also [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Osoaviakhim used Nazi scientists]] to strengthen it's own rocket program.
* The Weimar-era Communist Party of Germany is often painted as wholly complicit in Hitler's rise due to their refusal to work with the Social Democratic Party in forming a coalition against the Nazi Party, with the KPD being painted as ether self-righteous Stalinists slavishly obeying Moscow's dictates that social democrats were just another form of fascism or reckless accelerationists who thought that Hitler's regime would usher in a Communist revolution. While the Stalinist and accelerationist parts are true, and the communists were a major reason for Hitler's seizure of power, they were hardly the only ones to blame. There were many other factions that also played a key role in facilitating the rise of the Nazis (the majority of the parties in the Reichstag supported the Enabling Act, and it was a right-wing politician, Franz von Papen, who thought Hitler could be controlled by the political establishment in the first place). It also ignores the reasons aside from accelerationism and dictates from the Soviet Union for the commies' refusal to work with the social democrats. There was significant bad blood between the two parties, dating back to the German Revolution of 1918-19 when the social democrats sided against the communists.
[[/folder]]
