History Quotes / UnreliableNarrator

-->''[[UminekoNoNakuKoroNi End of the Golden Witch]]'', "????"

_>''"I wasn't really paying much attention to what anyone was saying at this part, but I'm pretty sure I can guess."''

-->-- '''Tim O'Brien''', ''Literature/TheThingsTheyCarried

“I’m shocked! You mean you and the First Child weren’t sleepover buddies and pen-pals?” Ching asked with a smile.\\

-->--'''[[TheSpoonyExperiment Miles Antwiler]]''' [[http://moviemoses.wordpress.com/2012/12/05/zyzzyx-road-2006-john-penney/ on]] ''Film/ZyzzyxRoad'' (2006)

->'''ThurlRavenscroft''': Yes, it's Superior Duck! The Duck of Yesterday!\\

-->--'''[[TheSpoonyExperiment Miles Antwiler]]''' [[http://moviemoses.wordpress.com/2012/12/05/zyzzyx-road-2006-john-penney/ on]] ''ZyzzyxRoad'' (2006)

''They found him in the tavern and they challenged him to fight\\''

-> But then my friend the philologist remarked that, although my ideas were not without interest, they had not been proved by anything. \\
At first, I was extremely surprised, but when I managed to understand the sense of what he was saying I saw that here, too, he was strictly consistent. \\
He called proof only a text containing precisely formulated information, but not considerations about the subject raised. Of course, I did not agree with him. \\
Because then I would have been obliged to assert [[Literature/TheTravelsOfMarcoPolo that Prester John ruled in the "Three Indias"]]! \\
[...] In the accounting system offered, a "proved statement" will not be one which has a footnote to an authentic source, but one which does not contradict \\
strictly established facts and logic, however paradoxical the conclusion based on such principles. Incidentally, this is how all natural scientists work.
--> -- '''L.N.Gumilev''', "[[RealityIsUnrealistic Searches for an Imaginary Kingdom]]".

->''There are three sides to every story: my side, your side and the truth. And no one is lying. Memories shared serve each one differently.''
-->-- '''Robert Evans''', ''The Kid Stays In the Picture''

->''It's my job to tell it like it is...or was... or whatever!''
-->-- '''Alan-a-Dale''', ''Disney/RobinHood''

->''"And that's how Equestria was made!"''
-->--[[CloudCuckoolander Pinkie Pie,]] after telling a story about how she got her cutie mark, WesternAnimation/MyLittlePonyFriendshipIsMagic

->''"The story is told - though who can say if it be true..."''
-->--'''Shari''', Gargoyles

->"''So you lie to yourself to be happy. There's nothing wrong with that -- we all do it! Who cares if there are a few details you'd rather not remember?''"
-->-- '''Teddy''', ''Film/{{Memento}}''

-->--'''Shari''', Gargoyles

-->--Shari, [[Gargoyles]]

-->--Shari, Disney/Gargoyles

-->--Shari, WesternAnimation/Gargoyles

-->--[[CloudCuckoolander Pinkie Pie,]] after telling a story about how she got her cutie mark, WesternAnimation/MyLittlePonyFriendshipIsMagic

-->-- ''LooneyTunes'', "Superior Duck"

By the end of the first game, it had already been made clear that we had broken the constant premise of the mystery genre: that the story itself must be seen though the eyes of God.

-->-- '''Alan-a-Dale''', ''[[Disney/RobinHood Robin Hood]]''

-->--[[CloudCuckoolander Pinkie Pie,]] after telling a story about how she got her cutie mark, MyLittlePonyFriendshipIsMagic

----

-> But then my friend the philologist remarked that, although my ideas were not without interest, they had not been proved by anything. At first, I was extremely surprised, but when I managed to understand the sense of what he was saying I saw that here, too, he was strictly consistent. He called proof only a text containing precisely formulated information, but not considerations about the subject raised. Of course, I did not agree with him. Because then I would have been obliged to assert [[Literature/TheTravelsOfMarcoPolo that Prester John ruled in the "Three Indias"]]! [...] In the accounting system offered, a "proved statement" will not be one which has a footnote to an authentic source, but one which does not contradict strictly established facts and logic, however paradoxical the conclusion based on such principles. Incidentally, this is how all natural scientists work.

->''It's my job to tell it like it is...or was...[[NotSoFastThereBucko or whatever]]!''

'''Daffy''': There is no such thing as the tallest locomotive. The accepted verb is not leap; the noun is not locomotive. Understand, a-vous?\\

-> But then my friend the philologist remarked that, although my ideas were not without interest, they had not been proved by anything. At first, I was extremely surprised, but when I managed to understand the sense of what he was saying I saw that here, too, he was strictly consistent. He called proof only a text containing precisely formulated information, but not considerations about the subject raised. Of course, I did not agree with him. Because then I would have been obliged to assert [[IlMilione that Prester John ruled in the "Three Indias"]]! [...] In the accounting system offered, a "proved statement" will not be one which has a footnote to an authentic source, but one which does not contradict strictly established facts and logic, however paradoxical the conclusion based on such principles. Incidentally, this is how all natural scientists work.

--> -- L.N.Gumilev, "[[RealityIsUnrealistic Searches for an Imaginary Kingdom]]".

-->-- Robert Evans, ''The Kid Stays In the Picture''

-> But then my friend the philologist remarked that, although my ideas were not without interest, they had not been proved by anything. At first, I was extremely surprised, but when I managed to understand the sense of what he was saying I saw that here, too, he was strictly consistent. He called proof only a text containing precisely formulated information, but not considerations about the subject raised. Of course, I did not agree with him. Because then I would have been obliged to assert that Prester John ruled in the "Three Indias"! [...] In the accounting system offered, a "proved statement" will not be one which has a footnote to an authentic source, but one which does not contradict strictly established facts and logic, however paradoxical the conclusion based on such principles. Incidentally, this is how all natural scientists work.

<<|QuotesWiki|>>