Follow TV Tropes

Following

History Platform / MacOS

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


!![=macOS=] 11 and the Mac based on Apple Silicon processors

[[https://9to5mac.com/2020/06/22/arm-mac-apple/ In June 2020]], Apple announced yet another CPU-architecture transition, this time from Intel processors onto internally designed ARM-based chips, which they have now branded as "Apple Silicon". These are similar to the processors that they had already been creating for the iPhone and iPad, but significantly more powerful in order to handle desktop workloads. To mark the transition, they also announced that the next version of [=macOS=], nicknamed "Big Sur", would finally bump the version number up to 11.0, nearly 20 years after the introduction of Mac OS X.

Just like they did during the prior architecture switches, Apple released macOS 11.0 with a set of tools designed to ease the transition for both developers and users. These include a new version of the Rosetta emulator that can run 64-bit Intel Mac apps on the new ARM Macs, and a new Universal binary format that will allow developers to create apps that run natively on both Intel and ARM Macs.

Upon the announcement of the transition, Apple stated the the full switch to the new architecture would take 2 years[[note]]They said the same thing during the Intel transition, though that one only took 1 year[[/note]]. Five months later, they launched the first ARM-based Macs, a [=MacBook Air=], a 13-inch [=MacBook Pro=], and a Mac Mini, using the new M1, the first Apple-designed chip created for Macs. The following year, they transitioned more Macs to the new chips, including an [=iMac=], and a full line up of Apple-silicon based [=MacBooks=]. With that, only a handful of Intel-based machines remain in Apple's line-up, with Apple Silicon replacements for those models expected to release in 2022. Even once this transition completes, it's likely that Apple will continue software support for Intel Macs for some years to come, though the exact extent of this remains to be seen[[note]]For comparison, the first [=PowerPC=]-only version of Mac OS, 8.5, released in 1998, 4 years after the last 68k Macs were sold, and the first Intel-only version, 10.6 "Snow Leopard", released in 2009, 3 years after the last [=PowerPC=] Macs were sold. Currently Apple seems committed to providing software support for its hardware for 6 years, so assuming this holds true and the last Intel Macs sell in 2022, then Intel support on [=macOS=] could last until 2028.[[/note]].

to:

!![=macOS=] 11 and the Mac based on transition to Apple Silicon processors

Silicon

[[https://9to5mac.com/2020/06/22/arm-mac-apple/ In June 2020]], Apple announced yet another CPU-architecture transition, this time from Intel processors onto internally designed to Apple-designed ARM-based chips, which they have now branded as "Apple Silicon". Apple silicon. These are similar to the processors that they had already been creating using for the iPhone and iPad, but significantly more powerful in order to handle laptop and desktop workloads. To mark the transition, they also announced that the next version of [=macOS=], nicknamed named "Big Sur", would finally bump the version number up to 11.0, nearly 20 years after the introduction of Mac OS X.

Just like they did during the prior architecture switches, Apple released macOS 11.0 with a set of tools designed to ease the transition for both developers and users. These include a new version of the Rosetta emulator that can run 64-bit Intel Mac apps on the new ARM Macs, ARM, and a new Universal binary format that will allow developers to create apps that run natively on both Intel and ARM Macs.

Upon the announcement of the transition, Apple stated the the full switch to the new architecture said it would take 2 years[[note]]They two years to complete.[[note]](They said the same thing during the Intel transition, though but that one only took 1 year[[/note]]. one year, probably because Intel's processors were readily available. This time around, they're building their own processors from the ground up, so the two-year estimate is likely to be accurate this time around.)[[/note]]. Five months later, they launched the first ARM-based Macs, a [=MacBook Air=], a 13-inch [=MacBook Pro=], and a Mac Mini, using the new M1, the first Apple-designed chip created for Macs. The following year, they transitioned more Macs to the new chips, Macs, including an [=iMac=], and a full line up of Apple-silicon based [=MacBooks=]. With that, only a handful of Intel-based machines remain in Apple's line-up, with Apple Silicon replacements for those models expected to release in 2022. Even once this transition completes, it's likely that Apple will continue software support for Intel Macs for some years to come, though the exact extent of this remains to be seen[[note]]For comparison, the first [=PowerPC=]-only version of Mac OS, 8.5, released in 1998, 4 years after the last 68k Macs were sold, and the first Intel-only version, 10.6 "Snow Leopard", released in 2009, 3 years after the last [=PowerPC=] Macs were sold. Currently Apple seems committed to providing software support for its hardware for 6 years, so assuming this holds true and the last Intel Macs sell in 2022, then Intel support on [=macOS=] could last until 2028.[[/note]].
Tabs MOD

Changed: 25

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
misuse


Work on [=NeXTStep=]'s renovation continued briskly, and in 1999, the first version of what would become the new Mac OS was released as ''Mac OS X Server 1.0'', better known to fans by the codename ''Rhapsody''. Rhapsody was something of a shock to veteran Mac users, combining bits of the Mac OS 8.0 interface with the far different [=NeXTStep=] 4.0 GUI. There was also no way to port classic Mac applications to Rhapsody at the time, forcing Apple to develop a subset of the old Mac [=APIs=] called "Carbon" that would allow properly made programs to work on both Mac OS 8/9 and Mac OS X. Carbon was announced in early 1998, and shipped along with the first releases of the Mac OS X development tools in 1999. Along with carbon was Classic, an emulator for running Mac OS 9 inside Mac OS X (which, by the way, [[ItIsPronouncedTroPay is pronounced "oh ess ten" and not "oh ess ecks"]]; the X is a Roman numeral).

to:

Work on [=NeXTStep=]'s renovation continued briskly, and in 1999, the first version of what would become the new Mac OS was released as ''Mac OS X Server 1.0'', better known to fans by the codename ''Rhapsody''. Rhapsody was something of a shock to veteran Mac users, combining bits of the Mac OS 8.0 interface with the far different [=NeXTStep=] 4.0 GUI. There was also no way to port classic Mac applications to Rhapsody at the time, forcing Apple to develop a subset of the old Mac [=APIs=] called "Carbon" that would allow properly made programs to work on both Mac OS 8/9 and Mac OS X. Carbon was announced in early 1998, and shipped along with the first releases of the Mac OS X development tools in 1999. Along with carbon was Classic, an emulator for running Mac OS 9 inside Mac OS X (which, by the way, [[ItIsPronouncedTroPay is pronounced "oh ess ten" and not "oh ess ecks"]]; ecks"; the X is a Roman numeral).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Upon the announcement of the transition, Apple stated the the full switch to the new architecture would take 2 years[[note]]They said the same thing during the Intel transition, though that one only took 1 year[[/note]]. Five months later, they launched the first ARM-based Macs, a [=MacBook Air=], a 13-inch [=MacBook Pro=], and a Mac Mini, using the new M1, the first Apple-designed chip created for Macs. The following year, they transitioned more Macs to the new chips, including an [=iMac=], and a full line up of Apple-silicon based [=MacBooks=]. With that, only a handful of Intel-based machines remain in Apple's line-up, with Apple Silicon replacements for those models expected to release in 2022. Even once this transition completes, it's likely that Apple will continue software support for Intel Macs for some years to come, though the exact extent of this remains to be seen[[note]]For comparison, the first [=PowerPC=]-only version of Mac OS, 8.5, released in 1998, 4 years after the last 68k Macs were sold, and the first Intel-only version, 10.6 "Snow Leopard", released in 2009, 3 years after the last [=PowerPC=] Macs were sold.[[/note]].

to:

Upon the announcement of the transition, Apple stated the the full switch to the new architecture would take 2 years[[note]]They said the same thing during the Intel transition, though that one only took 1 year[[/note]]. Five months later, they launched the first ARM-based Macs, a [=MacBook Air=], a 13-inch [=MacBook Pro=], and a Mac Mini, using the new M1, the first Apple-designed chip created for Macs. The following year, they transitioned more Macs to the new chips, including an [=iMac=], and a full line up of Apple-silicon based [=MacBooks=]. With that, only a handful of Intel-based machines remain in Apple's line-up, with Apple Silicon replacements for those models expected to release in 2022. Even once this transition completes, it's likely that Apple will continue software support for Intel Macs for some years to come, though the exact extent of this remains to be seen[[note]]For comparison, the first [=PowerPC=]-only version of Mac OS, 8.5, released in 1998, 4 years after the last 68k Macs were sold, and the first Intel-only version, 10.6 "Snow Leopard", released in 2009, 3 years after the last [=PowerPC=] Macs were sold. Currently Apple seems committed to providing software support for its hardware for 6 years, so assuming this holds true and the last Intel Macs sell in 2022, then Intel support on [=macOS=] could last until 2028.[[/note]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Upon the announcement of the transition, Apple stated the the full switch to the new architecture would take 2 years[[note]]They said the same thing during the Intel transition, though that one only took 1 year[[/note]]. Five months later, they launched the first ARM-based Macs, a [=MacBook Air=], a 13-inch [=MacBook Pro=], and a Mac Mini, using the new M1, the first Apple-designed chip created for Macs. The following year, they transitioned more Macs to the new chips, including an [=iMac=], and a full line up of Apple-silicon based [=MacBooks=]. With that, only a handful of Intel-based machines remain in Apple's line-up, with Apple Silicon replacements for those models expected to release in 2022. Even once this transition completes, it's expected that Apple will continue software support for Intel Macs for some years to come, though the exact extent of this remains to be seen[[note]]For comparison, the first [=PowerPC=]-only version of Mac OS, 8.5, released in 1998, 4 years after the last 68k Macs were sold, and the first Intel-only version, 10.6 "Snow Leopard", released in 2009, 3 years after the last [=PowerPC=] Macs were sold.[[/note]].

to:

Upon the announcement of the transition, Apple stated the the full switch to the new architecture would take 2 years[[note]]They said the same thing during the Intel transition, though that one only took 1 year[[/note]]. Five months later, they launched the first ARM-based Macs, a [=MacBook Air=], a 13-inch [=MacBook Pro=], and a Mac Mini, using the new M1, the first Apple-designed chip created for Macs. The following year, they transitioned more Macs to the new chips, including an [=iMac=], and a full line up of Apple-silicon based [=MacBooks=]. With that, only a handful of Intel-based machines remain in Apple's line-up, with Apple Silicon replacements for those models expected to release in 2022. Even once this transition completes, it's expected likely that Apple will continue software support for Intel Macs for some years to come, though the exact extent of this remains to be seen[[note]]For comparison, the first [=PowerPC=]-only version of Mac OS, 8.5, released in 1998, 4 years after the last 68k Macs were sold, and the first Intel-only version, 10.6 "Snow Leopard", released in 2009, 3 years after the last [=PowerPC=] Macs were sold.[[/note]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Upon the announcement of the transition, Apple stated the the full switch to the new architecture would take 2 years[[note]]They said the same thing during the Intel transition, though that one only took 1 year[[/note]]. Five months later, they launched the first ARM-based Macs, a [=MacBook Air=], a 13-inch [=MacBook Pro=], and a Mac Mini, using the new M1, the first Apple-designed chip created for Macs. The following year, they transitioned more of their line to the new chips, including an [=iMac=], and a full line up of Apple-silicon based [=MacBooks=]. With that, only a handful of Intel-based machines remain in Apple's line-up, with Apple Silicon replacements for those models expected to release in 2022. Even once this transition completes, it's expected that Apple will continue software support for Intel Macs for some years to come, though the exact extent of this remains to be seen[[note]]For comparison, the first [=PowerPC=]-only version of Mac OS, 8.5, released in 1998, 4 years after the last 68k Macs were sold, and the first Intel-only version, 10.6 "Snow Leopard", released in 2009, 3 years after the last [=PowerPC=] Macs were sold.[[/note]].

to:

Upon the announcement of the transition, Apple stated the the full switch to the new architecture would take 2 years[[note]]They said the same thing during the Intel transition, though that one only took 1 year[[/note]]. Five months later, they launched the first ARM-based Macs, a [=MacBook Air=], a 13-inch [=MacBook Pro=], and a Mac Mini, using the new M1, the first Apple-designed chip created for Macs. The following year, they transitioned more of their line Macs to the new chips, including an [=iMac=], and a full line up of Apple-silicon based [=MacBooks=]. With that, only a handful of Intel-based machines remain in Apple's line-up, with Apple Silicon replacements for those models expected to release in 2022. Even once this transition completes, it's expected that Apple will continue software support for Intel Macs for some years to come, though the exact extent of this remains to be seen[[note]]For comparison, the first [=PowerPC=]-only version of Mac OS, 8.5, released in 1998, 4 years after the last 68k Macs were sold, and the first Intel-only version, 10.6 "Snow Leopard", released in 2009, 3 years after the last [=PowerPC=] Macs were sold.[[/note]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Upon the announcement of the transition, Apple stated the the full switch to the new architecture would take 2 years. Five months later, they launched the first ARM-based Macs, a [=MacBook Air=], a 13-inch [=MacBook Pro=], and a Mac Mini, using the new M1, the first Apple-designed chip created for Macs. The following year, they transitioned more of their line to the new chips, including an [=iMac=], and a full line up of Apple-silicon based [=MacBooks=]. With that, only a handful of Intel-based machines remain in Apple's line-up, with Apple Silicon replacements for those models expected to release in 2022. Even once this transition completes, it's expected that Apple will continue software support for Intel Macs for some years to come, though the exact extent of this remains to be seen[[note]]For comparison, the first [=PowerPC=]-only version of Mac OS, 8.5, released in 1998, 4 years after the last 68k Macs were sold, and the first Intel-only version, 10.6 "Snow Leopard", released in 2009, 3 years after the last [=PowerPC=] Macs were sold.[[/note]].

to:

Upon the announcement of the transition, Apple stated the the full switch to the new architecture would take 2 years.years[[note]]They said the same thing during the Intel transition, though that one only took 1 year[[/note]]. Five months later, they launched the first ARM-based Macs, a [=MacBook Air=], a 13-inch [=MacBook Pro=], and a Mac Mini, using the new M1, the first Apple-designed chip created for Macs. The following year, they transitioned more of their line to the new chips, including an [=iMac=], and a full line up of Apple-silicon based [=MacBooks=]. With that, only a handful of Intel-based machines remain in Apple's line-up, with Apple Silicon replacements for those models expected to release in 2022. Even once this transition completes, it's expected that Apple will continue software support for Intel Macs for some years to come, though the exact extent of this remains to be seen[[note]]For comparison, the first [=PowerPC=]-only version of Mac OS, 8.5, released in 1998, 4 years after the last 68k Macs were sold, and the first Intel-only version, 10.6 "Snow Leopard", released in 2009, 3 years after the last [=PowerPC=] Macs were sold.[[/note]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Upon the announcement of the transition, Apple stated the the full switch to the new architecture would take 2 years. Five months later, they launched the first ARM-based Macs, a [=MacBook Air=], a 13-inch [=MacBook Pro=], and a Mac Mini, using the new M1, the first Apple-designed chip created for Macs. The following year, they transitioned more of their line to the new chips, releasing a 24" M1-based iMac in April, and a full line up of Apple-silicon based [=MacBooks=] in October, supplementing the existing 13" [=MacBook=] Air and Pro models with 14" and 16" Pros, which used the upgraded M1 Pro and M1 Max chips. With that, only three Intel-based machines remain in Apple's line-up, a Mac Mini, the 27" iMac, and the Mac Pro, with Apple Silicon replacements for those models expected to release in 2022. Even once this transition completes, its expected that Apple will continue software support for Intel Macs for some years to come, though the exact extent of this remains to be seen[[note]]For comparison, the first [=PowerPC=]-only version of Mac OS, v8.5, released in 1998, 4 years after the last 68k Macs were discontinued, and the first Intel-only version, 10.6 "Snow Leopard", released in 2009, 3 years after the last [=PowerPC=] Macs were sold.[[/note]].

to:

Upon the announcement of the transition, Apple stated the the full switch to the new architecture would take 2 years. Five months later, they launched the first ARM-based Macs, a [=MacBook Air=], a 13-inch [=MacBook Pro=], and a Mac Mini, using the new M1, the first Apple-designed chip created for Macs. The following year, they transitioned more of their line to the new chips, releasing a 24" M1-based iMac in April, including an [=iMac=], and a full line up of Apple-silicon based [=MacBooks=] in October, supplementing the existing 13" [=MacBook=] Air and Pro models with 14" and 16" Pros, which used the upgraded M1 Pro and M1 Max chips. [=MacBooks=]. With that, only three a handful of Intel-based machines remain in Apple's line-up, a Mac Mini, the 27" iMac, and the Mac Pro, with Apple Silicon replacements for those models expected to release in 2022. Even once this transition completes, its it's expected that Apple will continue software support for Intel Macs for some years to come, though the exact extent of this remains to be seen[[note]]For comparison, the first [=PowerPC=]-only version of Mac OS, v8.8.5, released in 1998, 4 years after the last 68k Macs were discontinued, sold, and the first Intel-only version, 10.6 "Snow Leopard", released in 2009, 3 years after the last [=PowerPC=] Macs were sold.[[/note]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Upon the announcement of the transition, Apple stated the the full switch to the new architecture would take 2 years. Five months later, they launched the first ARM-based Macs, a [=MacBook Air=], a 13-inch [=MacBook Pro=], and a Mac Mini, using the new M1, the first Apple-designed chip created for Macs. The following year, they transitioned more of their line to the new chips, releasing a 24" M1-based iMac in April, and a full line up of Apple-silicon based [=MacBooks=] in October, supplementing the existing 13" [=MacBook=] Air and Pro models with 14" and 16" Pros, which used the upgraded M1 Pro and M1 Max chips. With that, only three Intel-based machines remain in Apple's line-up, a Mac Mini, the 27" iMac, and the Mac Pro.

to:

Upon the announcement of the transition, Apple stated the the full switch to the new architecture would take 2 years. Five months later, they launched the first ARM-based Macs, a [=MacBook Air=], a 13-inch [=MacBook Pro=], and a Mac Mini, using the new M1, the first Apple-designed chip created for Macs. The following year, they transitioned more of their line to the new chips, releasing a 24" M1-based iMac in April, and a full line up of Apple-silicon based [=MacBooks=] in October, supplementing the existing 13" [=MacBook=] Air and Pro models with 14" and 16" Pros, which used the upgraded M1 Pro and M1 Max chips. With that, only three Intel-based machines remain in Apple's line-up, a Mac Mini, the 27" iMac, and the Mac Pro.
Pro, with Apple Silicon replacements for those models expected to release in 2022. Even once this transition completes, its expected that Apple will continue software support for Intel Macs for some years to come, though the exact extent of this remains to be seen[[note]]For comparison, the first [=PowerPC=]-only version of Mac OS, v8.5, released in 1998, 4 years after the last 68k Macs were discontinued, and the first Intel-only version, 10.6 "Snow Leopard", released in 2009, 3 years after the last [=PowerPC=] Macs were sold.[[/note]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Upon the announcement of the transition, Apple stated the the full switch to the new architecture would take 2 years. Five months later, they launched the first ARM-based Macs, a [=MacBook Air=], a 13-inch [=MacBook Pro=], and a Mac Mini, using the new M1, the first Apple-designed chip created for Macs. The following year, they transitioned more of their line to the new chips, releasing a 24" M1-based iMac in April, and a full line up of Apple-silicon based [=MacBooks=] in October, supplementing the existing 13" [=MacBook=] Air and Pro models with 14" and 16" Pros, which used the upgraded M1 Pro and M1 Max chips. With that, only two Intel-based machines remain in Apple's line-up, the 27" iMac, and the Mac Pro.

to:

Upon the announcement of the transition, Apple stated the the full switch to the new architecture would take 2 years. Five months later, they launched the first ARM-based Macs, a [=MacBook Air=], a 13-inch [=MacBook Pro=], and a Mac Mini, using the new M1, the first Apple-designed chip created for Macs. The following year, they transitioned more of their line to the new chips, releasing a 24" M1-based iMac in April, and a full line up of Apple-silicon based [=MacBooks=] in October, supplementing the existing 13" [=MacBook=] Air and Pro models with 14" and 16" Pros, which used the upgraded M1 Pro and M1 Max chips. With that, only two three Intel-based machines remain in Apple's line-up, a Mac Mini, the 27" iMac, and the Mac Pro.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Upon the announcement of the transition, Apple stated the the full transition to the new architecture would take 2 years. Five months later, they launched first ARM-based Macs, a [=MacBook Air=], a 13-inch [=MacBook Pro=], and a Mac Mini, using the new M1, the first Apple-designed chip created for Macs. The following year, they transitioned more of their line to the new chips, releasing a 24" M1-based iMac in April, and a full line up of Apple-silicon based [=MacBooks=] in October, supplementing the existing 13" [=MacBook=] Air and Pro models with 14" and 16" Pros, which used the upgraded M1 Pro and M1 Max chips. With that, only two Intel-based machines remain in Apple's line-up, the 27" iMac, and the Mac Pro.

to:

Upon the announcement of the transition, Apple stated the the full transition switch to the new architecture would take 2 years. Five months later, they launched the first ARM-based Macs, a [=MacBook Air=], a 13-inch [=MacBook Pro=], and a Mac Mini, using the new M1, the first Apple-designed chip created for Macs. The following year, they transitioned more of their line to the new chips, releasing a 24" M1-based iMac in April, and a full line up of Apple-silicon based [=MacBooks=] in October, supplementing the existing 13" [=MacBook=] Air and Pro models with 14" and 16" Pros, which used the upgraded M1 Pro and M1 Max chips. With that, only two Intel-based machines remain in Apple's line-up, the 27" iMac, and the Mac Pro.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Upon the announcement of the transition, Apple stated the the full transition to the new architecture would take 2 years. Five months later, they launched first ARM-based Macs [[note]]A [=MacBook Air=], a 13-inch [=MacBook Pro=], and a Mac Mini[[/note]] in November 2020, using the new M1, the first Apple-designed chip specifically created for Macs. The following year, they transitioned more of their line to the new chips, releasing a 24" M1-based iMac in April, and a full line up of Apple-silicon based [=MacBooks=] in October, supplementing the existing 13" [=MacBook=] Air and Pro models with 14" and 16" Pros, which used the upgraded M1 Pro and M1 Max chips. With that, only two Intel-based machines remained in Apple's line-up, the 27" iMac, and the Mac Pro.

to:

Upon the announcement of the transition, Apple stated the the full transition to the new architecture would take 2 years. Five months later, they launched first ARM-based Macs [[note]]A Macs, a [=MacBook Air=], a 13-inch [=MacBook Pro=], and a Mac Mini[[/note]] in November 2020, Mini, using the new M1, the first Apple-designed chip specifically created for Macs. The following year, they transitioned more of their line to the new chips, releasing a 24" M1-based iMac in April, and a full line up of Apple-silicon based [=MacBooks=] in October, supplementing the existing 13" [=MacBook=] Air and Pro models with 14" and 16" Pros, which used the upgraded M1 Pro and M1 Max chips. With that, only two Intel-based machines remained remain in Apple's line-up, the 27" iMac, and the Mac Pro.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Apple launched the first ARM-based Macs [[note]]A [=MacBook Air=], a 13-inch [=MacBook Pro=], and a Mac Mini[[/note]] in November 2020, using the new M1, the first Apple-designed chip specifically created for Macs.

to:

Upon the announcement of the transition, Apple stated the the full transition to the new architecture would take 2 years. Five months later, they launched the first ARM-based Macs [[note]]A [=MacBook Air=], a 13-inch [=MacBook Pro=], and a Mac Mini[[/note]] in November 2020, using the new M1, the first Apple-designed chip specifically created for Macs.
Macs. The following year, they transitioned more of their line to the new chips, releasing a 24" M1-based iMac in April, and a full line up of Apple-silicon based [=MacBooks=] in October, supplementing the existing 13" [=MacBook=] Air and Pro models with 14" and 16" Pros, which used the upgraded M1 Pro and M1 Max chips. With that, only two Intel-based machines remained in Apple's line-up, the 27" iMac, and the Mac Pro.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Next up: Sierra. This release changed the name of the OS itself: instead of "OS X", it went with the simpler "macOS". This release brings the Mac closer to iOS, and not it's not just the name: it introduced iOS' virtual assistant Siri to the Mac, it let users pay for things online with Apple Pay, and your Apple Watch can now seamlessly unlock your Mac.

to:

Next up: Sierra. This release changed the name of the OS itself: instead of "OS X", it went with the simpler "macOS"."macOS"[[note]]To align itself with Apple's other operating systems, [=iOS=], [=watchOS=], and [=tvOS=], and probably to differentiate itself from [[UsefulNotes/MicrosoftWindows Windows 10]], which launched the previous year[[/note]]. This release brings the Mac closer to iOS, and not it's not just the name: it introduced iOS' virtual assistant Siri to the Mac, it let users pay for things online with Apple Pay, and your Apple Watch can now seamlessly unlock your Mac.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


[[https://9to5mac.com/2020/06/22/arm-mac-apple/ On June 2020]], Apple announced that the Mac would be switching off of Intel processors onto internally designed ARM-based processors, which they have now branded as "Apple Silicon". These are similar to the processors that they had already been creating for the iPhone and iPad, but significantly more powerful in order to handle desktop workloads. To mark the transition, they also announced that the next version of [=macOS=], nicknamed "Big Sur", would finally bump the version number up to 11.0, nearly 20 years after the introduction of Mac OS X.

to:

[[https://9to5mac.com/2020/06/22/arm-mac-apple/ On In June 2020]], Apple announced that the Mac would be switching off of yet another CPU-architecture transition, this time from Intel processors onto internally designed ARM-based processors, chips, which they have now branded as "Apple Silicon". These are similar to the processors that they had already been creating for the iPhone and iPad, but significantly more powerful in order to handle desktop workloads. To mark the transition, they also announced that the next version of [=macOS=], nicknamed "Big Sur", would finally bump the version number up to 11.0, nearly 20 years after the introduction of Mac OS X.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


[[https://9to5mac.com/2020/06/22/arm-mac-apple/ On June 2020]], Apple announced that the Mac would be switching off of Intel processors onto ARM-based processors designed in-house, which they have now branded as "Apple Silicon". These are similar to the processors that they had already been using in the iPhone and iPad, but significantly more powerful in order to handle desktop workloads. To mark the transition, they also announced that the next version of [=macOS=], nicknamed "Big Sur", would finally bump the version number up to 11.0, nearly 20 years after the introduction of Mac OS X.

to:

[[https://9to5mac.com/2020/06/22/arm-mac-apple/ On June 2020]], Apple announced that the Mac would be switching off of Intel processors onto internally designed ARM-based processors designed in-house, processors, which they have now branded as "Apple Silicon". These are similar to the processors that they had already been using in creating for the iPhone and iPad, but significantly more powerful in order to handle desktop workloads. To mark the transition, they also announced that the next version of [=macOS=], nicknamed "Big Sur", would finally bump the version number up to 11.0, nearly 20 years after the introduction of Mac OS X.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


!! Big Sur 11.0 and the Mac based on Apple Silicon processors

to:

!! Big Sur 11.0 !![=macOS=] 11 and the Mac based on Apple Silicon processors



Apple launched the first ARM-based Macs [[note]]A [=MacBook Air=] and a 13-inch [=MacBook Pro=][[/note]]in November 2020, using the new M1, the first Apple-designed chip specifically created for Macs.

to:

Apple launched the first ARM-based Macs [[note]]A [=MacBook Air=] and Air=], a 13-inch [=MacBook Pro=][[/note]]in Pro=], and a Mac Mini[[/note]] in November 2020, using the new M1, the first Apple-designed chip specifically created for Macs.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Just like they did during the [=PowerPC=]-Intel switch, Apple released macOS 11.0 with a set of tools designed to ease the transition for both developers and users. These include a new version of the Rosetta emulator that can run 64-bit Intel Mac apps on the new ARM Macs, and a new Universal binary format that will allow developers to create apps that run natively on both Intel and ARM Macs.

to:

Just like they did during the [=PowerPC=]-Intel switch, prior architecture switches, Apple released macOS 11.0 with a set of tools designed to ease the transition for both developers and users. These include a new version of the Rosetta emulator that can run 64-bit Intel Mac apps on the new ARM Macs, and a new Universal binary format that will allow developers to create apps that run natively on both Intel and ARM Macs.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Apple launched the first ARM-based Macs [[note]]A [=MacBook Air=] and a 13-inch [=MacBook Pro=][[/note]]in November 2020, using the new M1 chip specifically designed for Macs.

to:

Apple launched the first ARM-based Macs [[note]]A [=MacBook Air=] and a 13-inch [=MacBook Pro=][[/note]]in November 2020, using the new M1 M1, the first Apple-designed chip specifically designed created for Macs.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Just like they did during the [=PowerPC=]-Intel switch, Apple included a set of tools with macOS 11.0 to ease the transition for both developers and users. These include a new version of the Rosetta emulator that can run 64-bit Intel Mac apps on the new ARM Macs, and a new Universal binary format that will allow developers to create apps that run natively on both Intel and ARM Macs.

to:

Just like they did during the [=PowerPC=]-Intel switch, Apple included released macOS 11.0 with a set of tools with macOS 11.0 designed to ease the transition for both developers and users. These include a new version of the Rosetta emulator that can run 64-bit Intel Mac apps on the new ARM Macs, and a new Universal binary format that will allow developers to create apps that run natively on both Intel and ARM Macs.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


macOS 11.0 includes a new version of the Rosetta emulator that can run 64-bit Intel Mac apps on the new ARM Macs, like they did in 2005 when they switched from [=PowerPC=] to Intel. They also introduced a new Universal binary format that will allow developers to create apps that run natively on both Intel and ARM Macs, also just like they did during the [=PowerPC=]-Intel transition.

to:

Just like they did during the [=PowerPC=]-Intel switch, Apple included a set of tools with macOS 11.0 includes to ease the transition for both developers and users. These include a new version of the Rosetta emulator that can run 64-bit Intel Mac apps on the new ARM Macs, like they did in 2005 when they switched from [=PowerPC=] to Intel. They also introduced and a new Universal binary format that will allow developers to create apps that run natively on both Intel and ARM Macs, also just like they did during the [=PowerPC=]-Intel transition.
Macs.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


macOS 11.0 includes an emulator that can run 64-bit Intel Mac apps on the new ARM Macs, like they did in 2005 when they switched from Motorola to [=IBM=] [=PowerPC=].

to:

macOS 11.0 includes an a new version of the Rosetta emulator that can run 64-bit Intel Mac apps on the new ARM Macs, like they did in 2005 when they switched from Motorola [=PowerPC=] to [=IBM=] [=PowerPC=].
Intel. They also introduced a new Universal binary format that will allow developers to create apps that run natively on both Intel and ARM Macs, also just like they did during the [=PowerPC=]-Intel transition.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Starting in 1986, the Mac got its first signs of becoming a usable PC. The Mac Plus added new, larger [=ROMs=] and a SCSI bus for hard drives and scanners. The Mac II was a workstation-class machine with full 32-bit addressing and massive expansion capabilities. All this required a new Mac OS, and the new code added things like color support and the Hierarchical File System (still in use in one form or another to this day). Later, [=MultiFinder=] made it possible to run more than one application at once, but most Mac users (especially on the Plus and its follow-on, the SE) didn't have the memory to use it well.

to:

Starting in 1986, the Mac got its first signs of becoming a usable PC. The Mac Plus added new, larger [=ROMs=] and a SCSI bus for hard drives and scanners. The Mac II was a workstation-class machine with full 32-bit addressing and massive expansion capabilities. All this required a new Mac OS, and the new code added things like color support and the Hierarchical File System (still in use (which Apple continued using in one form or another to this day).until they introduced the Apple File System (APFS) in 2017). Later, [=MultiFinder=] made it possible to run more than one application at once, but most Mac users (especially on the Plus and its follow-on, the SE) didn't have the memory to use it well.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Apple launched the first ARM-based Macs in November 2020, using the new M1 chip specifically designed for Macs.

to:

Apple launched the first ARM-based Macs in [[note]]A [=MacBook Air=] and a 13-inch [=MacBook Pro=][[/note]]in November 2020, using the new M1 chip specifically designed for Macs.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


[[https://9to5mac.com/2020/06/22/arm-mac-apple/ On June 2020]], Apple announced that the Mac would be switching off of Intel processors onto ARM-based processors designed in-house, which they have now branded as "Apple Silicon". These are similar to the processors that they had already been using in the iPhone and iPad. To mark the transition, they also announced that the next version of [=macOS=], nicknamed "Big Sur", would finally bump the version number up to 11.0, nearly 20 years after the introduction of Mac OS X.

to:

[[https://9to5mac.com/2020/06/22/arm-mac-apple/ On June 2020]], Apple announced that the Mac would be switching off of Intel processors onto ARM-based processors designed in-house, which they have now branded as "Apple Silicon". These are similar to the processors that they had already been using in the iPhone and iPad.iPad, but significantly more powerful in order to handle desktop workloads. To mark the transition, they also announced that the next version of [=macOS=], nicknamed "Big Sur", would finally bump the version number up to 11.0, nearly 20 years after the introduction of Mac OS X.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


[[https://9to5mac.com/2020/06/22/arm-mac-apple/ On June 2020]], Apple announced that the Mac would be switching off of Intel processors onto ARM-based processors designed in-house, which they have now branded as "Apple Silicon". These are similar to the processors that they had already been using in the iPhone and iPad.

to:

[[https://9to5mac.com/2020/06/22/arm-mac-apple/ On June 2020]], Apple announced that the Mac would be switching off of Intel processors onto ARM-based processors designed in-house, which they have now branded as "Apple Silicon". These are similar to the processors that they had already been using in the iPhone and iPad.
iPad. To mark the transition, they also announced that the next version of [=macOS=], nicknamed "Big Sur", would finally bump the version number up to 11.0, nearly 20 years after the introduction of Mac OS X.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


[[https://9to5mac.com/2020/06/22/arm-mac-apple/ On June 2020]], Apple announced that the Mac would be switching off of Intel processors onto ARM-based processors designed in-house. These are similar to the processors that they had already been using in the iPhone and iPad.

to:

[[https://9to5mac.com/2020/06/22/arm-mac-apple/ On June 2020]], Apple announced that the Mac would be switching off of Intel processors onto ARM-based processors designed in-house.in-house, which they have now branded as "Apple Silicon". These are similar to the processors that they had already been using in the iPhone and iPad.

Added: 112

Changed: 57

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


!! Big Sur 11.0 and the Mac based on A-series processors

[[https://9to5mac.com/2020/06/22/arm-mac-apple/ On June 2020]], Apple announced that the Mac would be switching off of Intel processors onto the ARM-based A series of processors that they designed in-house. These are the same processors that they had already been using in the iPhone and iPad.

to:

!! Big Sur 11.0 and the Mac based on A-series Apple Silicon processors

[[https://9to5mac.com/2020/06/22/arm-mac-apple/ On June 2020]], Apple announced that the Mac would be switching off of Intel processors onto the ARM-based A series of processors that they designed in-house. These are similar to the same processors that they had already been using in the iPhone and iPad.


Added DiffLines:

Apple launched the first ARM-based Macs in November 2020, using the new M1 chip specifically designed for Macs.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


[https://9to5mac.com/2020/06/22/arm-mac-apple/#jp-carousel-652849 On June 2020], Apple announced that the Mac would be switching off of Intel processors onto the ARM-based A series of processors that they designed in-house. These are the same processors that they had already been using in the iPhone and iPad.

macOS 11.0 includes an emulator that can run 64-bit Intel Mac apps on the new ARM Macs, like they did in 2005 when they switched from Motorola to IBM PowerPC.

to:

[https://9to5mac.com/2020/06/22/arm-mac-apple/#jp-carousel-652849 [[https://9to5mac.com/2020/06/22/arm-mac-apple/ On June 2020], 2020]], Apple announced that the Mac would be switching off of Intel processors onto the ARM-based A series of processors that they designed in-house. These are the same processors that they had already been using in the iPhone and iPad.

macOS 11.0 includes an emulator that can run 64-bit Intel Mac apps on the new ARM Macs, like they did in 2005 when they switched from Motorola to IBM PowerPC.
[=IBM=] [=PowerPC=].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

!! Big Sur 11.0 and the Mac based on A-series processors

[https://9to5mac.com/2020/06/22/arm-mac-apple/#jp-carousel-652849 On June 2020], Apple announced that the Mac would be switching off of Intel processors onto the ARM-based A series of processors that they designed in-house. These are the same processors that they had already been using in the iPhone and iPad.

macOS 11.0 includes an emulator that can run 64-bit Intel Mac apps on the new ARM Macs, like they did in 2005 when they switched from Motorola to IBM PowerPC.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Apple's comeback started in earnest in 1998, with the introduction of the Bondi Blue iMac sporting the brand-new Mac OS 8.5. The iMac brought other changes, including moving to the ''[=OpenFirmware=]'' BIOS that made supporting [=OSes=] other than the original Mac OS much easier. This setup, referred to by Apple developers as "New World" after the tech note that first described it ("The Macintosh ROM Enters a New World"), put the majority of the classic Mac OS ROM in a file on the hard drive and officially made it possible to boot non-Apple [=OSes=] without workarounds.

to:

Apple's comeback started in earnest in 1998, with the introduction of the Bondi Blue iMac sporting the brand-new Mac OS 8.5. The iMac brought other changes, including moving to the ''[=OpenFirmware=]'' BIOS that made supporting [=OSes=] other than the original Mac OS much easier. This setup, referred to by Apple developers as "New World" after the tech note that first described it ("The Macintosh ([[https://www.fenestrated.net/mirrors/Apple%20Technotes%20(As%20of%202002)/tn/tn1167.html "The Mac ROM Enters a New World"), World"]]), put the majority of the classic Mac OS ROM in a file on the hard drive and officially made it possible to boot non-Apple [=OSes=] without workarounds.

Top