History Main / TheThemeParkVersion

9th Dec '17 3:41:19 PM Mdumas43073
Is there an issue? Send a Message


* Creator/LinManuelMiranda's ''Theatre/{{Hamilton}}'' has been criticized in more than a few quarters for trafficking in "[[https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2003/09/founders-chic/302773/ Founders' Chic]]", repackaging familiar stereotypes about the founders (UsefulNotes/GeorgeWashington the HumbleHero[[note]]He was considerably ambitious personally and well aware of how famous he was but it was mainly decorum at the time that compelled him to put on a humble personality and airs of non-partisanship when he was in fact a major wheeler-dealer property owner[[/note]], UsefulNotes/ThomasJefferson the Hypocrite[[note]]Which is accurate but it's an accusation that few held against him at the time, and one which everyone was equally guilty of[[/note]], Aaron Burr, an usurping and ambitious man without loyalty[[note]]A portrayal that owes itself to slander printed against Burr by Hamilton and Jefferson, eliminating the fact that he played a key role in abolishing slavery in New York State, was the most pro-women's rights among the founders and founded a bank to help the immigrants and new settlers get cheap loans to get a start[[/note]]) that was criticized by historians [[https://www.washingtonpost.com/posteverything/wp/2016/03/30/liberals-love-alexander-hamilton-but-aaron-burr-was-a-real-progressive-hero/ Nancy Isenberg]], and [[https://www.nytimes.com/2016/04/11/theater/hamilton-and-history-are-they-in-sync.html Sean Willentz]] among others. Most notably, the show cultivates sympathy for its protagonist, UsefulNotes/AlexanderHamilton, [[http://www.slate.com/articles/arts/culturebox/2016/04/a_hamilton_critic_on_why_the_musical_isn_t_so_revolutionary.html by arguing that he was an abolitionist based on highly selective interpretation of loose facts]], and prominently ignoring parts of history that belie that claim.

to:

* Creator/LinManuelMiranda's ''Theatre/{{Hamilton}}'' has been criticized in more than a few quarters for trafficking in "[[https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2003/09/founders-chic/302773/ Founders' Founders Chic]]", repackaging familiar stereotypes about the founders (UsefulNotes/GeorgeWashington the HumbleHero[[note]]He was considerably ambitious personally and well aware of how famous he was but it was mainly decorum at the time that compelled him to put on a humble personality and airs of non-partisanship when he was in fact a major wheeler-dealer property owner[[/note]], UsefulNotes/ThomasJefferson the Hypocrite[[note]]Which is accurate but it's an accusation that few held against him at the time, and one which everyone was equally guilty of[[/note]], Aaron Burr, an usurping and ambitious man without loyalty[[note]]A portrayal that owes itself to slander printed against Burr by Hamilton and Jefferson, eliminating the fact that he played a key role in abolishing slavery in New York State, was the most pro-women's rights among the founders and founded a bank to help the immigrants and new settlers get cheap loans to get a start[[/note]]) that was criticized by historians [[https://www.washingtonpost.com/posteverything/wp/2016/03/30/liberals-love-alexander-hamilton-but-aaron-burr-was-a-real-progressive-hero/ Nancy Isenberg]], and [[https://www.nytimes.com/2016/04/11/theater/hamilton-and-history-are-they-in-sync.html Sean Willentz]] among others. Most notably, the show cultivates sympathy for its protagonist, UsefulNotes/AlexanderHamilton, [[http://www.slate.com/articles/arts/culturebox/2016/04/a_hamilton_critic_on_why_the_musical_isn_t_so_revolutionary.html by arguing that he was an abolitionist based on highly selective interpretation of loose facts]], and prominently ignoring parts of history that belie that claim.
9th Dec '17 3:40:14 PM Mdumas43073
Is there an issue? Send a Message


--> '''[[http://www.slate.com/articles/arts/culturebox/2016/04/a_hamilton_critic_on_why_the_musical_isn_t_so_revolutionary.html Lyra Monteiro]]''': ''This is a way that writers of [[HollywoodHistory popular history]] ([[NotSoDifferent and some academic historians]]) represent the founders as [[CoolPeopleRebelAgainstAuthority relate-able, cool guys]]. Founders Chic tends to really downplay the involvement of the Founding Fathers in slavery, and this play does that 100 percent...So the 12th line of the play where itís mentioned, ďhe struggled and kept his guard upĒ is the line right after talking about slaves being slaughtered and carted away. But we have [[RiddleForTheAges no idea what Alexander Hamiltonís attitude]] toward slavery was when he was a boy growing up in the Caribbean. He worked on a slave ship. I mean, chances are probably pretty high that he was in favor of it; that was his livelihood. So few white people were opposed to slavery, especially white people in the Caribbean. Itís kind of bonkers to suggest that he was somehow suffering and feeling like slavery was an injustice at that time. ''

to:

--> '''[[http://www.slate.com/articles/arts/culturebox/2016/04/a_hamilton_critic_on_why_the_musical_isn_t_so_revolutionary.html Lyra Monteiro]]''': ''This This is a way that writers of [[HollywoodHistory popular history]] ([[NotSoDifferent and some academic historians]]) represent the founders as [[CoolPeopleRebelAgainstAuthority relate-able, cool guys]]. Founders Chic tends to really downplay the involvement of the Founding Fathers in slavery, and this play does that 100 percent...So the 12th line of the play where itís mentioned, ďhe struggled and kept his guard upĒ is the line right after talking about slaves being slaughtered and carted away. But we have [[RiddleForTheAges no idea what Alexander Hamiltonís attitude]] toward slavery was when he was a boy growing up in the Caribbean. He worked on a slave ship. I mean, chances are probably pretty high that he was in favor of it; that was his livelihood. So few white people were opposed to slavery, especially white people in the Caribbean. Itís kind of bonkers to suggest that he was somehow suffering and feeling like slavery was an injustice at that time. ''
4th Dec '17 5:37:50 AM Muppet
Is there an issue? Send a Message

Added DiffLines:

* The final world of Anarcute is called Anarland, a literal theme park designed by TheManBehindTheMan to cash in on the protagonists protests. The final battle even has the BigBad fighting you in a [[TheMerch weaponized T-shirt making machine]].
3rd Dec '17 5:41:43 PM CJCroen1393
Is there an issue? Send a Message

Added DiffLines:

** Humorously, the ''inverse'' is also surprisingly common--American characters in anime and manga will frequently be portrayed with either AmericansAreCowboys, PhenotypeStereotype, {{Eagleland}}, WearingAFlagOnYourHead or any combination thereof.
24th Nov '17 11:16:14 AM nombretomado
Is there an issue? Send a Message


* Making ''VideoGame/MarioKart'' clones is one of the the most common ways to make the compact versions out of serious motorsport events. EA made ''[[UsefulNotes/{{NASCAR}} NASCAR Kart Racing]]'' and Codemasters made ''[[FormulaOne F1 Race Stars]]'', for examples.

to:

* Making ''VideoGame/MarioKart'' clones is one of the the most common ways to make the compact versions out of serious motorsport events. EA made ''[[UsefulNotes/{{NASCAR}} NASCAR Kart Racing]]'' and Codemasters made ''[[FormulaOne ''[[UsefulNotes/FormulaOne F1 Race Stars]]'', for examples.
18th Sep '17 8:10:09 AM Morgenthaler
Is there an issue? Send a Message


[[folder:Films]]

to:

[[folder:Films]][[folder:Films -- Animated]]
* ''WesternAnimation/QuestForCamelot'' fits the trope description perfectly; pretty much everything that happens in the movie, happens because it happens in this sort of movie. The fact that it doesn't make sense for that particular thing to happen didn't stop the writers from putting it in anyway.
* On Amazon, a rather extreme reviewer of ''Disney/{{Aladdin}}'' argued that the architecture and costumes were all wrong for the time period, attempting to pinpoint when they could take place, speculating that the story would be sometime after the 1630's, around the reign of Mughal Emperor Shah Jahan, instead of accepting the film's blatant AnachronismStew for what it was.
* Disney's Beauty and the Beast falls prey to this trope in its sequel, Disney/BeautyAndTheBeastTheEnchantedChristmas. It takes place in the Enchanted Castle, has Belle, The Beast, and the Enchanted Objects. . . and has pretty much nothing else related to the original film.
* ''WesternAnimation/TheCareBearsAdventureInWonderland'' is this with Wonderland, compared to the actual place in ''Literature/AliceInWonderland''.
[[/folder]]

[[folder:Films -- Live-Action]]



* ''WesternAnimation/QuestForCamelot'' fits the trope description perfectly; pretty much everything that happens in the movie, happens because it happens in this sort of movie. The fact that it doesn't make sense for that particular thing to happen didn't stop the writers from putting it in anyway.
* On Amazon, a rather extreme reviewer of ''Disney/{{Aladdin}}'' argued that the architecture and costumes were all wrong for the time period, attempting to pinpoint when they could take place, speculating that the story would be sometime after the 1630's, around the reign of Mughal Emperor Shah Jahan, instead of accepting the film's blatant AnachronismStew for what it was.
* Disney's Beauty and the Beast falls prey to this trope in its sequel, Disney/BeautyAndTheBeastTheEnchantedChristmas. It takes place in the Enchanted Castle, has Belle, The Beast, and the Enchanted Objects. . . and has pretty much nothing else related to the original film.



* ''WesternAnimation/TheCareBearsAdventureInWonderland'' is this with Wonderland, compared to the actual place in ''Literature/AliceInWonderland''.
17th Sep '17 11:08:47 AM nombretomado
Is there an issue? Send a Message


** A good example is UsefulNotes/{{Paris}} since the 1960s, where French Presidents tried to install new buildings. The Centre Georges Pompidou, an art gallery, was built on top of the famous covered market of Les Halles, a historical working class district. The construction of the Olympics for UsefulNotes/{{London}} in 2012, led to the destruction of Hackney, another historical working class area. In the case of New York City, a city that in its TheBigRottenApple phase was lamented for its high crime and urban decay ''and'' celebrated for its art, culture and city life (because the high crime made rents cheap), gentrification has made the rents go up and has made the city a billionaires paradise. There's also a darker angle, since Spike Lee notes that property prices of areas increase when white residents move in formerly poor but respected ghettoes (often because they are attracted to the MeltingPot reputation a locale attracted over time) and [[http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2014/02/spike-lee-amazing-rant-against-gentrification.html what Spike Lee derisively labels the Christopher Columbus Syndrome]] which inevitably transforms a region into a shadow of what it once was for the benefit of new settlers.

to:

** A good example is UsefulNotes/{{Paris}} since the 1960s, where French Presidents tried to install new buildings. The Centre Georges Pompidou, an art gallery, was built on top of the famous covered market of Les Halles, a historical working class district. The construction of the Olympics for UsefulNotes/{{London}} in 2012, led to the destruction of Hackney, another historical working class area. In the case of New York City, a city that in its TheBigRottenApple phase was lamented for its high crime and urban decay ''and'' celebrated for its art, culture and city life (because the high crime made rents cheap), gentrification has made the rents go up and has made the city a billionaires paradise. There's also a darker angle, since Spike Lee notes that property prices of areas increase when white residents move in formerly poor but respected ghettoes (often because they are attracted to the MeltingPot UsefulNotes/MeltingPot reputation a locale attracted over time) and [[http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2014/02/spike-lee-amazing-rant-against-gentrification.html what Spike Lee derisively labels the Christopher Columbus Syndrome]] which inevitably transforms a region into a shadow of what it once was for the benefit of new settlers.
5th Sep '17 5:40:24 PM Peteman
Is there an issue? Send a Message


* The Mesozoic Era gets hit with this trope hard. Many forms of fictional DinosaurMedia will feature the standard [[PredatorsAreMean ugly, bloodthirsty carnivores]] (like ''TyrannosaurusRex'') and [[HerbivoresAreFriendly docile, good-natured herbivores]] (like ''Brontosaurus''), horrifying {{Sea Monster}}s that make the shark from ''Film/{{Jaws}}'' look like a guppy (marine reptiles like ''Plesiosaurus'') and [[PteroSoarer airborne terrors]] that [[DeathFromAbove descend upon helpless creatures on the ground]] (pterosaurs like ''Pteranodon''). The landscape will almost always be depicted as alien and unfamiliar, with even the flora being impossible to recognize, and the whole thing would be completely covered in volcanoes and molten lakes, with everyday life being a constant fight for survival. Of course, nearly all of these are exaggerated and some, like the volcanoes, are almost totally fabricated. The flora of the Mesozoic wasn't all that different from the flora we have now[[note]]and indeed, many of said fauna such as monkey-puzzle trees and ginkoes are still fairly common today[[/note]] and the animals were, for all intents and purposes, still normal animals. A living ''T. rex'' would be no more vicious or terrifying than a modern lion or grizzly bear ([[SarcasmMode aside from being 20-30 times more massive, three and a half times as tall, six times as long and capable of eating an average lion or grizzly in one bite]]), and on the flipside, a plant eating dinosaur would not necessarily be friendly (modern plant eaters [[BewareTheNiceOnes certainly aren't]]). The sea reptiles and pterosaurs would likely be the same way.

to:

* The Mesozoic Era gets hit with this trope hard.trope. Many forms of fictional DinosaurMedia will feature the standard [[PredatorsAreMean ugly, bloodthirsty carnivores]] (like ''TyrannosaurusRex'') and [[HerbivoresAreFriendly docile, good-natured herbivores]] (like ''Brontosaurus''), horrifying {{Sea Monster}}s that make the shark from ''Film/{{Jaws}}'' look like a guppy (marine reptiles like ''Plesiosaurus'') and [[PteroSoarer airborne terrors]] that [[DeathFromAbove descend upon helpless creatures on the ground]] (pterosaurs like ''Pteranodon''). The landscape will almost always be depicted as alien and unfamiliar, with even the flora being impossible to recognize, and the whole thing would be completely covered in volcanoes and molten lakes, with everyday life being a constant fight for survival. Of course, nearly all of these are exaggerated and some, like the volcanoes, are almost totally fabricated. The flora of the Mesozoic wasn't all that different from the flora we have now[[note]]and indeed, many of said fauna such as monkey-puzzle trees and ginkoes are still fairly common today[[/note]] and the animals were, for all intents and purposes, still normal animals. A living ''T. rex'' would be no more vicious or terrifying than a modern lion or grizzly bear ([[SarcasmMode aside from being 20-30 times more massive, three and a half times as tall, six times as long and capable of eating an average lion or grizzly in one bite]]), and on the flipside, a plant eating dinosaur would not necessarily be friendly (modern plant eaters [[BewareTheNiceOnes certainly aren't]]). The sea reptiles and pterosaurs would likely be the same way.
5th Aug '17 7:56:08 PM JulianLapostat
Is there an issue? Send a Message


** Either one of the World Wars could easily eat up all the time allotted to history secondary education. Each nation participating in said conflict tend to focus or emphasize their part in the conflict over a broadly global perspective, mostly for nationalistic reasons. American students as well as international students on account of EaglelandOsmosis and AmericaWinsTheWar, think that both these conflicts were singularly won by America to the detriment of the involvement of other, non-English speaking, nations. Thanks to the UsefulNotes/ColdWar, this has led to the virtual removal from public consciousness of the contribution of the Soviet Union, when they mounted the largest offensive, endured greater casualties, and the suffered (and committed) worse war crimes, than the other sides combined and were the ones who liberated the major extermination camps. It was only since the 80s and 90s, that UsefulNotes/TheHolocaust was mentioned or depicted widely. The depictions of the war are still largely shaped by the Western Front, with its images of the Americans and British liberating their future [=NATO=] allies to the detriment of the East and the Pacific. In the case of the Pacific, the experiences of the Chinese, the Burmese, the Indians during the War get little say compared to the naval war of the US on the Pacific.
*** Russia's version of the war is every bit as guilty of this. It regularly downplays (or ignores completely) Soviet reliance on Lend-Lease aid from America, Britain, and Canada, and the importance of the Battle of the Atlantic and the North African campaign in ensuring that they received that aid. The Anglo-American strategic bombing campaign (which forced the Luftwaffe to allocate more and more of its strength to defend the German heartland rather than using it to hammer the Red Army) is rarely mentioned at all. The idea that the [=USSR's=] victory on the Eastern Front was a ForegoneConclusion is just as simplistic as AmericaWinsTheWar.

to:

** Either one of the World Wars could easily eat up all the time allotted to history secondary education. Each nation participating in said conflict tend to focus or emphasize their part in the conflict over a broadly global perspective, mostly for nationalistic reasons. American students as well as international students on account of EaglelandOsmosis and AmericaWinsTheWar, think that both these conflicts were singularly won by America to the detriment of the involvement of other, non-English speaking, nations. Thanks to the UsefulNotes/ColdWar, this has led to the virtual removal from public consciousness of the contribution of the Soviet Union, when they mounted the largest offensive, fought harder, endured greater casualties, casualties and the suffered (and committed) worse worst war crimes, than the other sides combined and were the ones who liberated the major extermination camps. It was only since the 80s and 90s, that UsefulNotes/TheHolocaust was mentioned or depicted widely. The depictions of the war are still largely shaped by the Western Front, with its images of the Americans and British liberating their future [=NATO=] allies to the detriment of the East and the Pacific. In the case of the Pacific, the experiences of the Chinese, the Burmese, the Indians during the War get little say compared to the naval war of the US on the Pacific. \n*** Russia's version of the war is every bit as guilty of this. It regularly downplays (or ignores completely) Soviet reliance on Lend-Lease aid from America, Britain, and Canada, and the importance of the Battle of the Atlantic and the North African campaign in ensuring that they received that aid. The Anglo-American strategic bombing campaign (which forced the Luftwaffe to allocate more and more of its strength to defend the German heartland rather than using it to hammer the Red Army) is rarely mentioned at all. The idea that the [=USSR's=] victory on the Eastern Front was a ForegoneConclusion is just as simplistic as AmericaWinsTheWar.
5th Aug '17 7:41:05 PM YT45
Is there an issue? Send a Message


** Either one of the World Wars could easily eat up all the time allotted to history secondary education. Each nation participating in said conflict tend to focus or emphasize their part in the conflict over a broadly global perspective, mostly for nationalistic reasons. American students as well as international students on account of EaglelandOsmosis and AmericaWinsTheWar, think that both these conflicts were singularly won by America to the detriment of the involvement of other, non-English speaking, nations. Thanks to the UsefulNotes/ColdWar, this has led to the virtual removal from public consciousness of the contribution of the Soviet Union, when they mounted the largest offensive, fought harder, endured greater casualties and the worst war crimes, than the other sides combined and were the ones who liberated the major extermination camps. It was only since the 80s and 90s, that UsefulNotes/TheHolocaust was mentioned or depicted widely. The depictions of the war are still largely shaped by the Western Front, with its images of the Americans and British liberating their future [=NATO=] allies to the detriment of the East and the Pacific. In the case of the Pacific, the experiences of the Chinese, the Burmese, the Indians during the War get little say compared to the naval war of the US on the Pacific.

to:

** Either one of the World Wars could easily eat up all the time allotted to history secondary education. Each nation participating in said conflict tend to focus or emphasize their part in the conflict over a broadly global perspective, mostly for nationalistic reasons. American students as well as international students on account of EaglelandOsmosis and AmericaWinsTheWar, think that both these conflicts were singularly won by America to the detriment of the involvement of other, non-English speaking, nations. Thanks to the UsefulNotes/ColdWar, this has led to the virtual removal from public consciousness of the contribution of the Soviet Union, when they mounted the largest offensive, fought harder, endured greater casualties casualties, and the worst suffered (and committed) worse war crimes, than the other sides combined and were the ones who liberated the major extermination camps. It was only since the 80s and 90s, that UsefulNotes/TheHolocaust was mentioned or depicted widely. The depictions of the war are still largely shaped by the Western Front, with its images of the Americans and British liberating their future [=NATO=] allies to the detriment of the East and the Pacific. In the case of the Pacific, the experiences of the Chinese, the Burmese, the Indians during the War get little say compared to the naval war of the US on the Pacific.
*** Russia's version of the war is every bit as guilty of this. It regularly downplays (or ignores completely) Soviet reliance on Lend-Lease aid from America, Britain, and Canada, and the importance of the Battle of the Atlantic and the North African campaign in ensuring that they received that aid. The Anglo-American strategic bombing campaign (which forced the Luftwaffe to allocate more and more of its strength to defend the German heartland rather than using it to hammer the Red Army) is rarely mentioned at all. The idea that the [=USSR's=] victory on the Eastern Front was a ForegoneConclusion is just as simplistic as AmericaWinsTheWar.
This list shows the last 10 events of 200. Show all.
http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/article_history.php?article=Main.TheThemeParkVersion