Follow TV Tropes

Following

History Main / TheKingslayer

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Jaime Lannister's InSeriesNickname is "The Kingslayer". In the backstory, he killed the arguably evil, [[TheCaligula and unarguably mad]], King Aerys II Targaryen. In doing so, he ended a massive CivilWar and saved over half a million lives, as the Mad King had hatched a TakingYouWithMe plot that was intended to burn the entire capital city to the ground. That being said, he was also a member of the king's PraetorianGuard -- and, more importantly, only one other character (and the audience) have ever actually learned his motivations. As a result, he is reviled throughout Westeros as TheOathbreaker, OnceDoneNeverForgotten; plus, he's also a scion of the arriviste Lannister family that the rebels saw as "Johnny come latelies" who parlayed their opportunistic actions to grab royal favor. And, of course, he's engaging in {{Twincest}} and, when a child found out about it, he [[WouldHurtAChild threw that child out a window.]] In short, he is seen by many as a disagreeable KarmaHoudini who should at the very least be ReassignedToAntarctica rather than continue as bodyguard, and a big part of his CharacterArc is deciding to show the world -- not by self-serving excuses, but by word and deed -- that he is more than an opportunist.

to:

** Jaime Lannister's InSeriesNickname is "The Kingslayer". In the backstory, he killed the arguably evil, [[TheCaligula and unarguably mad]], King Aerys II Targaryen. In doing so, he ended a massive CivilWar and saved over half a million lives, as the Mad King had hatched a TakingYouWithMe plot that was intended to burn the entire capital city to the ground. That being said, he was also a member of the king's PraetorianGuard -- and, more importantly, only one other character (and the audience) have ever actually learned his motivations. As a result, he is reviled throughout Westeros as TheOathbreaker, OnceDoneNeverForgotten; plus, he's also a scion of the arriviste Lannister family that the rebels saw as "Johnny come latelies" who parlayed their opportunistic actions to grab royal favor. And, of course, he's engaging in {{Twincest}} and, when a child found out about it, he [[WouldHurtAChild threw that child out a window.]] In short, he is seen by many as a disagreeable KarmaHoudini who should at the very least be ReassignedToAntarctica rather than continue his career as bodyguard, and a royal bodyguard. A big part of his CharacterArc is deciding to show the world -- not by self-serving excuses, but by word and deed -- that he is more than an opportunist.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Jaime Lannister's InSeriesNickname is "The Kingslayer". In the backstory, he killed the arguably evil, [[TheCaligula and unarguably mad]], King Aerys II Targaryen. In doing so, he ended a massive CivilWar and saved over half a million lives, as the Mad King had hatched a TakingYouWithMe plot that was intended to burn the entire capitol city to the ground. That being said, he was also a member of the king's PraetorianGuard -- and, more importantly, only one other character (and the audience) have ever actually learned his motivations. As a result, he is reviled throughout Westeros as TheOathbreaker, OnceDoneNeverForgotten; plus, he's also a scion of the arriviste Lannister family that the rebels saw as "Johnny come latelies" who parlayed their opportunistic actions to grab royal favor. And, of course, he's engaging in {{Twincest}} and, when a child found out about it, he [[WouldHurtAChild threw that child out a window.]] In short, he is seen by many as a disagreeable KarmaHoudini who should at the very least be ReassignedToAntarctica rather than continue as bodyguard, and a big part of his CharacterArc is deciding to show the world -- not by self-serving excuses, but by word and deed -- that he is more than an opportunist.

to:

** Jaime Lannister's InSeriesNickname is "The Kingslayer". In the backstory, he killed the arguably evil, [[TheCaligula and unarguably mad]], King Aerys II Targaryen. In doing so, he ended a massive CivilWar and saved over half a million lives, as the Mad King had hatched a TakingYouWithMe plot that was intended to burn the entire capitol capital city to the ground. That being said, he was also a member of the king's PraetorianGuard -- and, more importantly, only one other character (and the audience) have ever actually learned his motivations. As a result, he is reviled throughout Westeros as TheOathbreaker, OnceDoneNeverForgotten; plus, he's also a scion of the arriviste Lannister family that the rebels saw as "Johnny come latelies" who parlayed their opportunistic actions to grab royal favor. And, of course, he's engaging in {{Twincest}} and, when a child found out about it, he [[WouldHurtAChild threw that child out a window.]] In short, he is seen by many as a disagreeable KarmaHoudini who should at the very least be ReassignedToAntarctica rather than continue as bodyguard, and a big part of his CharacterArc is deciding to show the world -- not by self-serving excuses, but by word and deed -- that he is more than an opportunist.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


The reason why killing a monarch has always been such a big deal is twofold: one aspect of it is that before the rise of nationalism, the monarch was the carrier of the state's sovereignty (afterwards, it was the people through the social contract). In simpler terms, [[UsefulNotes/LEtatCestMoi the monarch was their country]], so anyone attacking them automatically set themself against all the state institutions. Likewise, any revolution against the King was effectively de-legitimizing all the institutions (Church, Army, Titles) that had formerly depended on royal patronage, or which had legitimized royalty before. Kings who ruled by [[DivineRightOfKings Divine Right]] were likewise considered to be ruling with {{God}}'s approval--and anyone attacking an anointed monarch automatically infringed upon ''God's'' prerogative of deciding who is a suitable ruler and who should go. This is especially the case in nations like England and Russia where royalty was part of the Church hierarchy as a whole. However, there were some theoreticians who allowed {{Tyrannicide}}. Additionally, monarchs had very good reason to disapprove of regicide, even towards rival monarchs, since they obviously wanted to discourage any thoughts of disposing of monarchs in general.

to:

The reason why killing a monarch has always been such a big deal is twofold: one aspect of it is that before the rise of nationalism, the monarch was the carrier of the state's sovereignty (afterwards, it was the people through the social contract). In simpler terms, [[UsefulNotes/LEtatCestMoi the monarch was their country]], so anyone attacking them automatically set themself against all the state institutions. Likewise, any revolution against the King was effectively de-legitimizing all the institutions (Church, Army, Titles) that had formerly depended on royal patronage, or which had legitimized royalty before. Kings who ruled by [[DivineRightOfKings Divine Right]] were likewise considered to be ruling with {{God}}'s approval--and anyone attacking an anointed monarch automatically infringed upon ''God's'' prerogative of deciding who is a suitable ruler and who should go. This is especially the case in nations like England UsefulNotes/{{England}} and Russia UsefulNotes/{{Russia}}, where royalty was part of the Church hierarchy as a whole. However, there were some theoreticians who allowed {{Tyrannicide}}. Additionally, monarchs had very good reason to disapprove of regicide, even towards rival monarchs, since they obviously wanted to discourage any thoughts of disposing of monarchs in general.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Movie is out now


* ''WesternAnimation/Nimona2023'': As the main trailer reveals, main character Ballister Boldheart has been framed for the murder of his nation’s queen. He seeks to catch the real killer and clear his name.

to:

* ''WesternAnimation/Nimona2023'': As the main trailer reveals, main Main character Ballister Boldheart has been framed for the murder of his nation’s queen. He seeks to catch the real killer and clear his name.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* ''WesternAnimation/Nimona2023'': As the main trailer reveals, main character Ballister Boldheart has been framed for the murder of his nation’s queen. He seeks to catch the real killer and clear his name.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


!!As a DeathTrope, spoilers will be unmarked on this page.

to:

!!As this is a DeathTrope, {{Death Trope|s}}, [[Administrivia/SpoilersOff unmarked spoilers will be unmarked on this page.abound]]. [[Administrivia/YouHaveBeenWarned Beware]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Askeladd doesn't actually live in Wales, and Sweyn does not actually know Askeladd is from Wales (or think about Askeladd at all) when he makes the threat against Wales.


* ''Manga/VinlandSaga'': After King Sweyn forces Askeladd to choose between no longer aiding [[TheUnFavourite his son Canute]] or [[TheVillainKnowsWhereYouLive having his ancestral homeland of Wales raided by the Danes]], Askeladd [[TakeAThirdOption picks a third option]]: [[OffWithHisHead decapitate Sweyn where he stands]].

to:

* ''Manga/VinlandSaga'': After King Sweyn forces Askeladd to choose between no longer aiding [[TheUnFavourite his son Canute]] or [[TheVillainKnowsWhereYouLive having his ancestral homeland of Wales raided by the Danes]], Danes, Askeladd [[TakeAThirdOption picks a third option]]: [[OffWithHisHead decapitate Sweyn where he stands]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* ''Manga/VinlandSaga'': After King Sweyn forces Askeladd to choose between no longer aiding [[TheUnFavourite his son Canute]] or [[TheVillainKnowsWhereYouLive having his ancestral homeland of Wales raided by the Danes]], Askeladd [[TakeAThirdOption picks a third option]]: [[OffWithHisHead decapitate Sweyn where he stands]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ''Manga/TheLegendOfZeldaOcarinaOfTime'''s manga makes it explicit than Ganondorf murdered princess Zelda's father when he took over Hyrule.

to:

* ''Manga/TheLegendOfZeldaOcarinaOfTime'''s manga ''Manga/TheLegendOfZeldaOcarinaOfTime1999'' makes it explicit than Ganondorf murdered princess Princess Zelda's father when he took over Hyrule.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe was the longest-serving PM in history and came from a prominent family that dominated the UsefulNotes/JapanesePoliticalSystem since UsefulNotes/WorldWarII, but soon after he left office he was assassinated by 41-year-old Tetsuya Yamagami with a homemade shotgun. After his arrest, Yamagami explained that the ChurchOfHappyology known as the [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unification_Church Moonies]] bankrupted his family and brainwashed his mother with Abe's family allowing them to run amok due to their support of right-wing values, and Abe became his primary target [[DontCreateAMartyr to avoid making the Moonies' leader a martyr]]. Once this came to light, the Japanese government decided VillainHasAPoint and began cracking down on the Moonies to prevent further tragedy.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* The unnamed King in ''VideoGame/KingsHeirRiseToTheThrone'' is killed very early in the story in a coup. The coup also involves [[FrameUp pinning the blame on the Ulmer brothers]], [[spoiler:one of which is unknowingly the true heir to the kingdom]], although the person who actually killed the king is [[spoiler:Badrick, the Queen's brother]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
disambig


** A nameless Amelekite tells David that he has killed King Saul ([[DrivenToSuicide at Saul's own request, no less]]).[[labelnote: *]]It's ambiguous whether he actually did the deed or if he was embellishing the story: at the end of 1 Samuel we're told Saul fell on his own sword[[/labelnote]] Since Saul had been trying to kill David, the Amelekite clearly expects to be rewarded for this. Instead, David has him executed for daring to kill God's anointed king.

to:

** A nameless Amelekite tells David that he has killed King Saul ([[DrivenToSuicide at Saul's own request, no less]]).[[labelnote: *]]It's ambiguous whether he actually did the deed or if he was embellishing the story: at the end of [[Literature/BooksOfSamuel 1 Samuel Samuel]] we're told Saul fell on his own sword[[/labelnote]] Since Saul had been trying to kill David, the Amelekite clearly expects to be rewarded for this. Instead, David has him executed for daring to kill God's anointed king.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* The kingdom of Kakheti (now part of UsefulNotes/GeorgiaCaucasus) suffered several cases of this.
** Alexander I (1445/1446-1511) was murdered by [[SelfMadeOrphan his own son George]], who was afraid his father was going to remove him from the line of succession.
** George (1464-1513), who went down in history as [[NamesToRunAwayFromReallyFast George the Evil]], [[LaserGuidedKarma became a victim of this himself]]. He invaded a neighbouring kingdom twice, was defeated and imprisoned, and was killed during his imprisonment.
** George's grandson Alexander II (1527-1605) was killed by [[HereWeGoAgain his own son]] [[SelfMadeOrphan Constantine]].
** Constantine (1567-1605) died a few months later [[HoistByHisOwnPetard as a direct result of his actions]]. The people of Kakheti refused to recognise him as king and supported his nephew instead. [[EvilUncle Constantine went to war against his nephew]] and was killed in battle.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


*** Baelor the Beloved could have been poisoned by his uncle Viserys II, who was the next King, but may have acted as he had been running the realm efficiently for years and Baelor's pious policies threatened this. However many people believe Baelor died from his excessive fasting.

to:

*** Baelor the Beloved could have been poisoned by his uncle Viserys II, who was the next King, but may have acted as he had been running the realm efficiently for years and Baelor's pious policies threatened this.this (some believe Baelor wished to invade the North and the Iron Islands to convert them to the Faith of the Seven by force). However many people believe Baelor died from his excessive fasting.



** It takes a king, Isildur, to slay Sauron, the SorcerousOverlord of the dark forces in the backstory of ''Literature/TheLordOfTheRings''. However, Sauron's One Ring of Power acts as a SoulJar, keeping him kind-of-sort-of alive until Frodo Baggins goes on a journey to Mount Doom to destroy the Ring. Ultimately, though, it's Gollum who destroys the Ring and Sauron--and he does it completely by accident.

to:

** It takes a king, Isildur, to slay Sauron, the SorcerousOverlord of the dark forces in the backstory of ''Literature/TheLordOfTheRings''. However, Sauron's One Ring of Power acts as a SoulJar, keeping him kind-of-sort-of kind of sort of alive until Frodo Baggins goes on a journey to Mount Doom to destroy the Ring. Ultimately, though, it's Gollum who destroys the Ring and Sauron--and he does it completely by accident.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* UsefulNotes/WorldWarOne was triggered by [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gavrilo_Princip Gavrilo Princip]], a young Serbian nationalist, assassinated Archduke Franz Ferdinand, the Crown Prince of the Austro-Hungarian Empire. A chain reaction of events that followed the Archduke's murder, along with various alliances and long-festering political issues, dragged one country after another into the war.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** During ''The Fremennik Isles'' quest, the player must slay the Ice Troll king and [[DemandingTheirHead bring back his head]] to the burgher of Neitiznot.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Galbatorix himself is one: Oromis mentions to Eragon that Galbatorix's first act upon defeating the Riders was to descend on the city of Illirea, capital of the Broddering Kingdom, depose and murder King Angrenost, then [[YouKillItYouBoughtIt claim Angrenost's crown and kingdom as the first part of his Empire]].

to:

* ** Galbatorix himself is one: Oromis mentions to Eragon that Galbatorix's first act upon defeating the Riders was to descend on the city of Illirea, capital of the Broddering Kingdom, depose and murder King Angrenost, then [[YouKillItYouBoughtIt claim Angrenost's crown and kingdom as the first part of his Empire]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Queen Cersei Lannister is the mastermind behind the death of her husband, King Robert Baratheon by letting her cousin, Lancel, gave more potent drink to Robert, which got him killed by a boar during their hunting trip. Later on, Lancel wasn't proud for what he had done and took a FaithHeelTurn which got Cersei exposed for adultery and murder by the ChurchMilitant.

to:

** Queen Cersei Lannister is the mastermind behind the death of her husband, King Robert Baratheon by letting her cousin, Lancel, gave more potent drink to Robert, which got him killed by a boar during their hunting trip. Later on, Lancel wasn't proud for what he had done and took a FaithHeelTurn HeelFaithTurn which got Cersei exposed for adultery and murder by the ChurchMilitant.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


*** When Aegon and his sisters conquered Westeros, they also killed the kings who ruled over the Reach (Mern IX Gardener), the Iron Islands and the Riverlands (Harren Hoare), and the Stormlands (Argilac Durrandon). Houses Arryn, Lannister, and Stark, who ruled the Vale, the Westerlands, and the North, respectively, chose to bend the knee, and as a result they were spared and allowed to rule as vassals in Aegon's new realm, the Seven Kingdoms.

to:

*** When Aegon and his sisters conquered Westeros, they also killed the kings who ruled over the Reach (Mern IX Gardener), the Iron Islands and the Riverlands (Harren Hoare), and the Stormlands (Argilac Durrandon). Houses Arryn, Lannister, and Stark, who ruled the Vale, Loren I Lannister of the Westerlands, and Torrhen Stark of the North, respectively, and Sharra Arryn of the Vale chose to bend the knee, and as a result they their houses were spared and allowed to rule as vassals in Aegon's new realm, the Seven Kingdoms.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

*** When Aegon and his sisters conquered Westeros, they also killed the kings who ruled over the Reach (Mern IX Gardener), the Iron Islands and the Riverlands (Harren Hoare), and the Stormlands (Argilac Durrandon). Houses Arryn, Lannister, and Stark, who ruled the Vale, the Westerlands, and the North, respectively, chose to bend the knee, and as a result they were spared and allowed to rule as vassals in Aegon's new realm, the Seven Kingdoms.

Added: 1652

Changed: 996

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** There have been numerous historical examples, such as Aegon II, who was poisoned as Cregan Stark approached the city towards the end of the civil war known as the Dance of the Dragons. Even though Cregan was fighting against Aegon II, he still felt a King's murder should be punished. He arrested many of those present, sending most of them to the Wall, executing those who refused to take the Black, but pardoning Corlys Velaryon under political pressure. Who poisoned Aegon is still unclear though.
** Baelor the Beloved could have been poisoned by his uncle Viserys II, who was the next King, but may have acted as he had been running the realm efficiently for years and Baelor's pious policies threatened this. However many people believe Baelor died from his excessive fasting. Ironically Viserys died the following year, possibly poisoned by his son Aegon IV "The Unworthy".

to:

** There have been numerous historical examples, such as examples:
*** Queen Visenya might have poisoned her nephew and stepson, Aenys I, to make way for her son, Maegor, to ascend to the Iron Throne. While the rumor is unconfirmed, [[MotherMakesYouKing Visenya did provide major backing for Maegor while she was alive]], to the point that his reign began to fall apart after she died.
*** Maegor himself was found dead in the Red Keep's throne room during the rebellion led by his nephew Jaehaerys, his neck impaled by one of the spikes of the Iron Throne. To this day, nobody knows how it happened, and theories ranging from his wife Elinor Costayne (whose first husband was killed by Maegor's forces) to a member of the Kingsguard to a random smallfolk who desired revenge against the king being possible suspects. Ominously, some even believe that the Iron Throne ''itself'' killed Maegor, having decided that he was unworthy of the crown.
***
Aegon II, who II was poisoned as Cregan Stark approached the city towards the end of the civil war known as the Dance of the Dragons. Even though Cregan was fighting against Aegon II, he still felt a King's murder should be punished. He arrested many of those present, sending most of them to the Wall, executing those who refused to take the Black, but pardoning Corlys Velaryon under political pressure. Who poisoned Aegon is still unclear though.
** *** Daeron I was assassinated during an expedition to conquer Dorne, being ambushed by a bunch of Dornishmen whom he convened for a peace meeting.
***
Baelor the Beloved could have been poisoned by his uncle Viserys II, who was the next King, but may have acted as he had been running the realm efficiently for years and Baelor's pious policies threatened this. However many people believe Baelor died from his excessive fasting. Ironically
*** Ironically, it was rumored that
Viserys II, who died the following year, possibly a year after Baelor I, was poisoned by his son Aegon IV "The Unworthy".Unworthy".
*** Maekar I was crushed to death by a boulder while quelling the Peake Uprising in the Reach.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* On ''Series/{{Forever}}'' one VictimOfTheWeek turns out to be a king-in-exile. He was only a child when he was deposed over 50 years ago and was forced to flee to the United States. Dying of cancer, he decided to apply for permission to return to his home country so he could die and be buried there. The day he makes his wish public, he is murdered. Henry tries to determine if the man was murdered because he was a king or because of more prosaic reasons.

to:

* On ''Series/{{Forever}}'' ''Series/{{Forever|2014}}'' one VictimOfTheWeek turns out to be a king-in-exile. He was only a child when he was deposed over 50 years ago and was forced to flee to the United States. Dying of cancer, he decided to apply for permission to return to his home country so he could die and be buried there. The day he makes his wish public, he is murdered. Henry tries to determine if the man was murdered because he was a king or because of more prosaic reasons.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

*{{Discussed}} in ''VideoGame/SonicAndTheBlackKnight''. Merlina warns Sonic that if he takes up [[CoolSword Caliburn]] and defeats the [[AdaptationalVillainy tyrannical]] Myth/KingArthur he "will forever be known as the worst of knights: slayer of kings". Sonic brushes it off, simply saying he "[[HeroWithBadPublicity can't be the hero every time]]".
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* ''VideoGame/{{Dishonored}}'': Daud, the leader of the [[MurderInc Whalers]], was hired to murder Empress Jessamine Kaldwin by Lord Regent Hiram Burrows, who wanted to silence her in fear to hide the fact he was responsible for the rat plague. He saw it as another job, justifying that he's killed plenty of nobles in his line of work, but he later comes to greatly regret his decision. Out of guilt, he [[HeroOfAnotherStory protects her heir, Emily, from having her body hijacked by the witch Delilah]], and when he encounters Corvo, he confesses his guilt and doesn't resist to being killed out of revenge.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
tweaking


* ''Literature/TheSagaOfTheJomsvikings'': Palnatóki, foster-father the young Svein Forkbeard, instructs his foster-son to raise a rebellion against his own father Harald Gormsson, King of Denmark. In the night after the first battle, Palnatóki sneaks near Harald's camp and assassinates him with a well-aimed arrow. With Harald dead, his troops submit to Svein, and Svein is made king. As king, Svein hosts a remembrance feast for his father at which he presents the arrow which killed Harald and interrogates all guests what they know about Harald's murder. Palnatóki bluntly admits that he killed Harald, upon which Svein at once (even though he owes his kingship to him) wants him killed. Palnatoki and his men can escape from the hall, but go into exile and never return to Denmark.

to:

* ''Literature/TheSagaOfTheJomsvikings'': Palnatóki, foster-father to the young Svein Forkbeard, instructs his foster-son to raise a rebellion against his own father Harald Gormsson, King of Denmark. In the night after the first (indecisive) battle, Palnatóki sneaks near Harald's camp and assassinates kills him with a well-aimed arrow. With Harald dead, his troops submit to Svein, and Svein is made king. As king, Svein hosts a remembrance feast for his father at which he presents the arrow which killed Harald and interrogates all guests about what they know about Harald's murder. Palnatóki bluntly admits that he killed Harald, upon which Svein at once (even though he owes his kingship to him) wants him killed. Palnatoki Palnatóki and his men can escape from the hall, but go into exile and never return to Denmark.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* ''Literature/TheSagaOfTheJomsvikings'': Palnatóki, foster-father the young Svein Forkbeard, instructs his foster-son to raise a rebellion against his own father Harald Gormsson, King of Denmark. In the night after the first battle, Palnatóki sneaks near Harald's camp and assassinates him with a well-aimed arrow. With Harald dead, his troops submit to Svein, and Svein is made king. As king, Svein hosts a remembrance feast for his father at which he presents the arrow which killed Harald and interrogates all guests what they know about Harald's murder. Palnatóki bluntly admits that he killed Harald, upon which Svein at once (even though he owes his kingship to him) wants him killed. Palnatoki and his men can escape from the hall, but go into exile and never return to Denmark.

Added: 244

Removed: 244

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* In ''Literature/TwentyYearsAfter'', Milady de Winter's son Mordaunt becomes involved in the English Civil War and commits regicide, executing King Charles I, in spite of the efforts of d'Artagnan and the three former musketeers to prevent it.



* In ''Literature/TwentyYearsAfter'', Milady de Winter's son Mordaunt becomes involved in the English Civil War and commits regicide, executing King Charles I, in spite of the efforts of d'Artagnan and the three former musketeers to prevent it.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ''Film/TheReturnOfTheMusketeers'' is a loose adaptation of ''Literature/TwentYearsAfter'' (see above). King Charles I of England is to be executed, so Queen Anne of Austria sends d'Artagnan, Athos, Porthos, and Raoul to rescue him. They attempt a rescue by knocking out the executioner, but Justine de Winter takes his place and beheads Charles.

to:

* ''Film/TheReturnOfTheMusketeers'' is a loose adaptation of ''Literature/TwentYearsAfter'' ''Literature/TwentyYearsAfter'' (see above).below). King Charles I of England is to be executed, so Queen Anne of Austria sends d'Artagnan, Athos, Porthos, and Raoul to rescue him. They attempt a rescue by knocking out the executioner, but Justine de Winter takes his place and beheads Charles.

Added: 706

Removed: 113

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* The end of ''Film/InglouriousBasterds'' sees UsefulNotes/AdolfHitler get gunned down by Ulmer and the Bear Jew.



* The end of ''Film/InglouriousBasterds'' sees UsefulNotes/AdolfHitler get gunned down by Ulmer and the Bear Jew.


Added DiffLines:

* ''Film/TheReturnOfTheMusketeers'' is a loose adaptation of ''Literature/TwentYearsAfter'' (see above). King Charles I of England is to be executed, so Queen Anne of Austria sends d'Artagnan, Athos, Porthos, and Raoul to rescue him. They attempt a rescue by knocking out the executioner, but Justine de Winter takes his place and beheads Charles.


Added DiffLines:

* In ''Literature/TwentyYearsAfter'', Milady de Winter's son Mordaunt becomes involved in the English Civil War and commits regicide, executing King Charles I, in spite of the efforts of d'Artagnan and the three former musketeers to prevent it.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Added gender-neutral writing


A character, for one reason or another, assassinates the King, the Emperor, the President, that one powerful guy whose position has massive mystique and glamor and charisma attached to it, no matter how badly they chose to use it. Usually the one to kill him is of the PraetorianGuard or someone equally close and trusted. However, it doesn't need to be a betrayal: it could perfectly well be an absolutely lawful execution after a fair trial. It won't matter to the people. He or she has ''slain'' a ''King''.

The reason why killing a monarch has always been such a big deal is twofold: one aspect of it is that before the rise of nationalism, the monarch was the carrier of the state's sovereignty (afterwards, it was the people through the social contract). In simpler terms, [[UsefulNotes/LEtatCestMoi the king was his country]], so anyone attacking him automatically set himself against all the state institutions. Likewise, any revolution against the King was effectively de-legitimizing all the institutions (Church, Army, Titles) that had formerly depended on royal patronage, or which had legitimized royalty before. Kings who ruled by [[DivineRightOfKings Divine Right]] were likewise considered to be ruling with {{God}}'s approval--and anyone attacking an anointed king automatically infringed upon ''God's'' prerogative of deciding who is a suitable king and who should go. This is especially the case in nations like England and Russia where the Kings were part of the Church hierarchy as a whole. However, there were some theoreticians who allowed {{Tyrannicide}}. Additionally, monarchs had very good reason to disapprove of regicide, even towards rival monarchs, since they obviously wanted to discourage any thoughts of disposing of monarchs in general.

to:

A character, for one reason or another, assassinates the King, the Emperor, the President, that one powerful guy whose position has massive mystique and glamor and charisma attached to it, no matter how badly they chose to use it. Usually the one to kill him is of the PraetorianGuard or someone equally close and trusted. However, it doesn't need to be a betrayal: it could perfectly well be an absolutely lawful execution after a fair trial. It won't matter to the people. He or she has They have ''slain'' a ''King''.

The reason why killing a monarch has always been such a big deal is twofold: one aspect of it is that before the rise of nationalism, the monarch was the carrier of the state's sovereignty (afterwards, it was the people through the social contract). In simpler terms, [[UsefulNotes/LEtatCestMoi the king monarch was his their country]], so anyone attacking him them automatically set himself themself against all the state institutions. Likewise, any revolution against the King was effectively de-legitimizing all the institutions (Church, Army, Titles) that had formerly depended on royal patronage, or which had legitimized royalty before. Kings who ruled by [[DivineRightOfKings Divine Right]] were likewise considered to be ruling with {{God}}'s approval--and anyone attacking an anointed king monarch automatically infringed upon ''God's'' prerogative of deciding who is a suitable king ruler and who should go. This is especially the case in nations like England and Russia where the Kings were royalty was part of the Church hierarchy as a whole. However, there were some theoreticians who allowed {{Tyrannicide}}. Additionally, monarchs had very good reason to disapprove of regicide, even towards rival monarchs, since they obviously wanted to discourage any thoughts of disposing of monarchs in general.



Expect them to [[OnceDoneNeverForgotten never be allowed to forget it]], and carry this moniker or a variation thereof for all their lives, if they don't get ''executed'' for it. In some instances this is an attempt to get a KlingonPromotion, possibly involving TheCoup. May overlap with HeroKiller. Someone aiming to KillTheGod is not satisfied with mere mortal monarchs, though the tropes may overlap if they target divine monarchs. This trope also usually doesn't apply to killing a King in battle. In this situation, the character is not the Kingslayer, but rather TheUsurper (if he gets HistoricalVillainUpgrade) and TheConqueror (if he gets HistoricalHeroUpgrade). This is because there is a sense that defeat in battle and in combat is considered "fair play" as opposed to killing a King by assassination, or even by trial and legal execution.

to:

Expect them to [[OnceDoneNeverForgotten never be allowed to forget it]], and carry this moniker or a variation thereof for all their lives, if they don't get ''executed'' for it. In some instances this is an attempt to get a KlingonPromotion, possibly involving TheCoup. May overlap with HeroKiller. Someone aiming to KillTheGod is not satisfied with mere mortal monarchs, though the tropes may overlap if they target divine monarchs. This trope also usually doesn't apply to killing a King in battle. In this situation, the character is not the Kingslayer, but rather TheUsurper (if he gets they get HistoricalVillainUpgrade) and TheConqueror (if he gets they get HistoricalHeroUpgrade). This is because there is a sense that defeat in battle and in combat is considered "fair play" as opposed to killing a King by assassination, or even by trial and legal execution.

Top