Follow TV Tropes

Following

History Main / TaxonomicTermConfusion

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** An example can be seen in this [[http://www.politedissent.com/archives/7104 Comic book PSA]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

**** The Russian term for "ape" is literally translated as "humaniform monkey" (человекообразная обезьяна). The term is likely archaic (probably the first thing that popped into their heads when they saw them), and nobody felt the need to change it after the apes were properly classified.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Removed Wall Banger reference (should only be used in Darth Wiki)


* The female scientist near the beginning of the series ''{{Surface}}'' described the creature she'd seen as [[WallBanger "An entirely new phylum of mammal!"]]

to:

* The female scientist near the beginning of the series ''{{Surface}}'' described the creature she'd seen as [[WallBanger "An entirely new phylum of mammal!"]]mammal!"
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* An episode of [[Fringe]] features what looks like a cucumber-sized slug that crawls out of its victim's mouth, which the cast later identifies as an [[MegaMicrobes enlarged]] single-cell cold virus. I repeat, a single-cell ''virus''.

to:

* An episode of [[Fringe]] {{Fringe}} features what looks like a cucumber-sized slug that crawls out of its victim's mouth, which the cast later identifies as an [[MegaMicrobes enlarged]] single-cell cold virus. I repeat, a single-cell ''virus''.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Fringe



to:

* An episode of [[Fringe]] features what looks like a cucumber-sized slug that crawls out of its victim's mouth, which the cast later identifies as an [[MegaMicrobes enlarged]] single-cell cold virus. I repeat, a single-cell ''virus''.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Natter — deleted text has nothing to do with the focus (taxonomy) of this trope.


** The "dominants" are basically humans with no emotions driven to try to beat humans in the survival game. They are also extremely smart.

to:

** The "dominants" are basically humans with no emotions driven to try to beat humans in the survival game. They are also extremely smart.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** On the other hand, -saurus is the latinized form of the greek word for lizard, and thus calling it lizard is justified on linguistic, rather than taxonomic, grounds, and that would even go for ''Basilosaurus''.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

**** It may be correct but that is an English, not a taxonomic issue. Some species called "ape" are not included in the group people usually think of as "apes", the Barbary Ape for instance. Furthermore the distinction between "apes" and "monkeys" seems to be rather unique to English. In Dutch for instance they all covered by the equivalent word "apen", a similar use of "ape" in English seems to be historical.


Added DiffLines:

*** The use of "ape" as "simian", as in Dutch or German, may be rare in English, but it is not extinct.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Using "rodent" to refer to any small mammal. Forgivable when applied to rabbits, which are in order Lagomorpha, closely related to Rodentia (together they form the clade Glires[[hottip:*:Which forms the clade Euarchontoglires with the Euarchonta, which includes humans. TheMoreYouKnow!]]), and have gnawing teeth of their own...not so forgivable when applied to, say, weasels (which are Carnivorans).

to:

* Using "rodent" to refer to any small mammal. Forgivable when applied to rabbits, which are in order Lagomorpha, closely related to Rodentia (together they form the clade Glires[[hottip:*:Which forms the clade Euarchontoglires with the Euarchonta, which includes humans. TheMoreYouKnow!]]), and have gnawing teeth of their own...not so as forgivable when applied to, say, weasels (which are Carnivorans).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

*** Or they've built an entirely separate phylogenetic tree for Pandoran life, and designated the Na'vi genus as "Homo" solely as an analogy rather than as a statement of literal relatedness, much like how many RealLife dinosaurs' names contain references to lizards or birds that aren't close kin to them.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Using "rodent" to refer to any small mammal. Forgivable when applied to rabbits, which are in order Lagomorpha, closely related to Rodentia, and have gnawing teeth of their own...not so forgivable when applied to, say, weasels.

to:

* Using "rodent" to refer to any small mammal. Forgivable when applied to rabbits, which are in order Lagomorpha, closely related to Rodentia, Rodentia (together they form the clade Glires[[hottip:*:Which forms the clade Euarchontoglires with the Euarchonta, which includes humans. TheMoreYouKnow!]]), and have gnawing teeth of their own...not so forgivable when applied to, say, weasels.
weasels (which are Carnivorans).

Added: 138

Changed: 295

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

* The main character in ''{{Prey}}'' claims in the pilot to have discovered a new species after analyzing a [=DNA=] sample with a 1.2% difference from a regular human. They later proceed to name the new "species" ''Homo dominants'', apparently unaware that you're supposed to use Latin for this.
** The "dominants" are basically humans with no emotions driven to try to beat humans in the survival game. They are also extremely smart.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

* Averted in the {{Warcraft}} franchise, where across all media species names are almost always left uncapitalized. However, many, many fans do so anyway.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Usage of the word "race" to mean "species" in SpeculativeFiction is probably an archaism, which stayed as a sort of genre convention.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


The scientific Latin name for a species consists of the genus name (capitalized), followed by the species name (in all lower case), both italicised. ''Tyrannosaurus rex'' is genus ''Tyrannosaurus'', species ''rex''; ''Homo sapiens'' is genus ''Homo'', species ''sapiens''. If the species is well known, or has already been mentioned earlier in the same work, the genus name will frequently be abbreviated to a single letter, e.g. ''T. rex'' or ''H. sapiens''.

to:

The scientific Latin name for a species consists of the genus name (capitalized), followed by the species name (in all lower case), both italicised. ''Tyrannosaurus rex'' is genus ''Tyrannosaurus'', species ''rex''; ''Homo sapiens'' is genus ''Homo'', species ''sapiens''. If the species is well known, or has already been mentioned earlier in the same work, the genus name will frequently be abbreviated to a single letter, e.g. ''T. rex'' or ''H. sapiens''. If more hairsplitting is needed, the subspecies or variety name can be appended as a third word, e.g. ''Homo sapiens sapiens''.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

The scientific Latin name for a species consists of the genus name (capitalized), followed by the species name (in all lower case), both italicised. ''Tyrannosaurus rex'' is genus ''Tyrannosaurus'', species ''rex''; ''Homo sapiens'' is genus ''Homo'', species ''sapiens''. If the species is well known, or has already been mentioned earlier in the same work, the genus name will frequently be abbreviated to a single letter, e.g. ''T. rex'' or ''H. sapiens''.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


(If you're having trouble remembering, remember this simple mnemonic: Danny Kaye, Please Come Over For Gay Sex. For a more SFW version, go with "Danny Kaye, Please Come Over For Good Strawberries" or "Dear King Phillip Came Over For Good Soup".)

to:

(If you're having trouble remembering, remember this simple mnemonic: Danny Kaye, Please Come Over For Gay Sex. For a more SFW version, go with "Danny Kaye, Please Come Over For Good Strawberries" or "Dear King Phillip Came Over For Good Soup".)
Before "Domain" was added to the top of the list, a mnemonic was "Kings Play Cards Only For Gold and Silver.")
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

*** [[{{EpilepticTrees}} Maybe they switched to a classification system based solely on homology to help classify alien life?]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Not given how technically precise the rest of the book attempts to be.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

* Occasionally a host of a FoodNetwork show will try to emulate Alton Brown's use of scientific terminology, and wind up sounding like a KnowNothingKnowItAll. The host of ''Food Feuds'', for one, has openly referred to clams as crustaceans, apparently on the assumption that all seafood without fins is in the same taxon.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Of course, every human, nay, every individual of any species born is almost certainly a mutant, several times over, by the actual definition of the term. A typical human may have dozens of alleles (that is, genetic variations) not present in either of its parents. These are all mutations.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Again with than/then confusion?!


Compound variations on these terms such as "subspecies" and "superfamily" are in common use. Some taxonomists also make use of the term "tribe" for a rank intermediate between subfamily and genus. This is not just limited to fiction; in a strictly factual sense birds are technically reptiles, and the whole animal, plant, fungus distinction is being [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Three-domain_system rewritten]] of late so more often then not, it's hard to know the correct terminology because it always is changing. It doesn't help matters that the current system was invented before evolution was understood, and that the ranks are pretty arbitrary. One "genus" might be older and more diverse than another "family." Some scientists even want to [[http://www.ohio.edu/phylocode/index.html abolish taxonomic ranks]], though that's not likely to happen soon.

to:

Compound variations on these terms such as "subspecies" and "superfamily" are in common use. Some taxonomists also make use of the term "tribe" for a rank intermediate between subfamily and genus. This is not just limited to fiction; in a strictly factual sense birds are technically reptiles, and the whole animal, plant, fungus distinction is being [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Three-domain_system rewritten]] of late so more often then than not, it's hard to know the correct terminology because it always is changing. It doesn't help matters that the current system was invented before evolution was understood, and that the ranks are pretty arbitrary. One "genus" might be older and more diverse than another "family." Some scientists even want to [[http://www.ohio.edu/phylocode/index.html abolish taxonomic ranks]], though that's not likely to happen soon.

Added: 175

Changed: 30

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Even more [[TVTropesDrinkingGame egregious]] as there are more arthropods in existence than every other phylum of animals combined.



** Isn't that ''really'' splitting hairs?



* The female scientist near the beginning of the series ''{{Surface}}'' described the creature she'd seen as "An entirely new phylum of mammal!"
* Anyone else want to punch the screen when Dr Who gave the (reptilian) cylureans the name "Homo reptilia"?

to:

* The female scientist near the beginning of the series ''{{Surface}}'' described the creature she'd seen as [[WallBanger "An entirely new phylum of mammal!"
mammal!"]]
* Anyone else want to punch the screen when Dr Who DoctorWho gave the (reptilian) cylureans Silurians the name "Homo reptilia"?
"''Homo reptilia''"?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

** The Na'vi themselves are classified as ''Homo pandora'', which would mean that they are closely related to humans. As we know they evolved from some sort of alien lemur creature, and not hominids transported from Earth, this is wrong.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


<<|HollywoodEvolution|>>)

to:

<<|HollywoodEvolution|>>)<<|HollywoodEvolution|>>
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


(If you're having trouble remembering, remember this simple mnemonic: Danny Kaye, Please Come Over For Gay Sex. For a more SFW version, go with "Danny Kaye, Please Come Over For Good Strawberries")

to:

(If you're having trouble remembering, remember this simple mnemonic: Danny Kaye, Please Come Over For Gay Sex. For a more SFW version, go with "Danny Kaye, Please Come Over For Good Strawberries")
Strawberries" or "Dear King Phillip Came Over For Good Soup".)
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


(If you're having trouble remembering, remember this simple mnemonic: Danny Kaye, Please Come Over For Gay Sex. For a more SFW version, go with "Danny Kaye, Please Come Over For Good Strawberries)

to:

(If you're having trouble remembering, remember this simple mnemonic: Danny Kaye, Please Come Over For Gay Sex. For a more SFW version, go with "Danny Kaye, Please Come Over For Good Strawberries)
Strawberries")
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


(If you're having trouble remembering, remember this simple mnemonic: Danny Kaye, Please Come Over For Gay Sex.)

to:

(If you're having trouble remembering, remember this simple mnemonic: Danny Kaye, Please Come Over For Gay Sex.)
For a more SFW version, go with "Danny Kaye, Please Come Over For Good Strawberries)
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** On an episode of ''SaleOfTheCentury'' someone got points for saying that a Baboon was an ape.

to:

** On an episode of ''SaleOfTheCentury'' someone got points for saying that a Baboon was an ape. They're actually Old World monkeys.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
added Moby Dick



to:

* Melville spends an entire chapter of ''MobyDick'' committing an extended crime against taxonomy. He starts by classifying whales as "spouting fish" and proceeds from there.

Top