Follow TV Tropes

Following

History Main / SpotlightFallacy

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Compare TheNewRockAndRoll.

to:

Compare TheNewRockAndRoll.TheNewRockAndRoll and CowboyBebopAtHisComputer.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Parents are terrified of their children being abducted by strangers, due to overwhelming coverage of such events (think Elizabeth Smart). However, the ''vast'' majority of kidnappings are committed by immediate family members or close friends.

to:

* Parents are terrified of their children being abducted by strangers, due to overwhelming coverage of such events (think Elizabeth Smart). However, the ''vast'' majority of kidnappings are committed by immediate family members or close friends. (For example, divorcing parents involved in a messy custody battle.)
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* IfItBleedsItLeads also tends to fuel this trope. With all the crime reports you see on television, do you ever get the impression that crime rates must be worse than ever? Sometimes crime rates ''have'' increased, but don't go jumping to conclusions: one reason you see more reports of crime these days is because the ubiquity of cell phones and other easily portable cameras has made capturing footage of crimes in progress a lot easier, while the rise of the internet has made disseminating these reports to the public a lot easier too. In many cases, the actual crime rates have actually ''decreased'' somewhat even as the number of crime reports has increased astronomically.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Similarly, the number of reports of school teachers caught molesting their students has skyrocketed with the advent of the internet. The number of ''reports'' has--not necessarily the amount of molestation going on or the number or proportion of child-molesting teachers to teachers in general. There's a bit of FalseCause in play here as well, as the reason for the rising number of reports may be for any number of reasons: better monitoring and oversight means child-molesting teachers get caught sooner and more often, victims' complaints are more likely to be believed and acted upon a lot sooner, and various new media are even more eager than the old media outlets to report and keep a LongList of incidents involving child-molesting teachers. In the case of both the priests and the teachers, it's also worth noting that child molesters naturally tend to gravitate to positions that grant them access to potential victims; as such, religious and secular educators are likely to have more child molesters among them than, say, cleaners or desk jockeys or workers in any other primarily grownup-oriented occupational fields.

to:

* Similarly, the number of reports of school teachers caught molesting their students has skyrocketed with the advent of the internet. The number of ''reports'' has--not necessarily the amount of molestation going on or the number or proportion of child-molesting teachers to teachers in general. There's a bit of FalseCause in play here as well, as the reason for the rising number of reports may be for any number of reasons: better monitoring and oversight means child-molesting teachers get caught sooner and more often, reformed social attitudes mean victims' complaints are more likely to be believed and acted upon a lot sooner, and various new media are even more eager than the old media outlets to report and keep a LongList of incidents involving child-molesting teachers. In the case of both the priests and the teachers, it's also worth noting that child molesters naturally tend to gravitate to positions that grant them access to potential victims; as such, religious and secular educators are likely to have more child molesters among them than, say, cleaners or desk jockeys or workers in any other primarily grownup-oriented occupational fields.field.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Similarly, the number of reports of school teachers caught molesting their students has skyrocketed with the advent of the internet. The number of ''reports'' has--not necessarily the amount of molestation going on or the number or proportion of child-molesting teachers to teachers in general. There's a bit of FalseCause in play here as well, as the reason for the rising number of reports may be for any number of reasons: better monitoring and oversight means child-molesting teachers get caught sooner and more often, victims' complaints are more likely to be believed and acted upon a lot sooner, and various new media are even more eager than the old media outlets to report and keep a LongList of incidents involving child-molesting teachers. In the case of both the priests and the teachers, it's also worth noting that child molesters naturally tend to gravitate to positions that grant them access to potential victims; as such, religious and secular educators' pools are likely to have more child molesters in them than, say, janitor's positions or office jobs or other primarily adult-oriented occupations.

to:

* Similarly, the number of reports of school teachers caught molesting their students has skyrocketed with the advent of the internet. The number of ''reports'' has--not necessarily the amount of molestation going on or the number or proportion of child-molesting teachers to teachers in general. There's a bit of FalseCause in play here as well, as the reason for the rising number of reports may be for any number of reasons: better monitoring and oversight means child-molesting teachers get caught sooner and more often, victims' complaints are more likely to be believed and acted upon a lot sooner, and various new media are even more eager than the old media outlets to report and keep a LongList of incidents involving child-molesting teachers. In the case of both the priests and the teachers, it's also worth noting that child molesters naturally tend to gravitate to positions that grant them access to potential victims; as such, religious and secular educators' pools educators are likely to have more child molesters in among them than, say, janitor's positions cleaners or office jobs desk jockeys or workers in any other primarily adult-oriented occupations. grownup-oriented occupational fields.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* Similarly, the number of reports of school teachers caught molesting their students has skyrocketed with the advent of the internet. The number of ''reports'' has--not necessarily the amount of molestation going on or the number or proportion of child-molesting teachers to teachers in general. There's a bit of FalseCause in play here as well, as the reason for the rising number of reports may be for any number of reasons: better monitoring and oversight means child-molesting teachers get caught sooner and more often, victims' complaints are more likely to be believed and acted upon a lot sooner, and various new media are even more eager than the old media outlets to report and keep a LongList of incidents involving child-molesting teachers. In the case of both the priests and the teachers, it's also worth noting that child molesters naturally tend to gravitate to positions that grant them access to potential victims; as such, religious and secular educators' pools are likely to have more child molesters in them than, say, janitor's positions or office jobs or other primarily adult-oriented occupations.

Added: 779

Changed: 3

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* School shootings are given extensive media coverage and are a common fear for parents; in fact, ''even in the USA'' they are so rare that a US child is more likely to be struck by lightning than to be killed by a mass-murderer (let alone one who targets a school). Needless to say, for the 95% of us who don't live in the USA that chance is several dozen times less likely still - to the point that you'd be wiser to fear sharks and vending machines.

to:

* School shootings are given extensive media coverage and are a common fear for parents; in fact, ''even in the USA'' they are so rare that a US child is more likely to be struck by lightning than to be killed by a mass-murderer (let alone one who targets a school). Needless to say, for the 95% of us who don't live in the USA that chance is several dozen times less likely still - to the point that you'd be wiser to fear sharks and vending machines. \\
\\
Moreover, ''some'' shootings get hyped more than others: to hear some reporters talk during the wall-to-wall coverage of the Columbine shootings, one would think school shootings had ''never happened before then''. In fact, several students had been shot in schools in previous years. The reason their shootings didn't get so much coverage? Most of these took place in poor inner-city schools in high-crime neighborhoods with a high percentage of racial minorities, and were the regrettable but predictable results of violent gang activity. Columbine was only extraordinary due to the shootings taking place in a better funded suburban school serving a relatively wealthy and low-crime neighborhood populated mostly by white people, where gang violence was all but nonexistent.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


:: A close cousin to the UsefulNotes/AnecdotalFallacy. The SpotlightFallacy is making a generalization based on how much news coverage a subject gets. This is fallacious because the news media tends to focus heavily on events that are less common in real life. However, because the news covers them so extensively, it's an easy mistake to make.

to:

:: A close cousin to the UsefulNotes/AnecdotalFallacy.AnecdotalFallacy. The SpotlightFallacy is making a generalization based on how much news coverage a subject gets. This is fallacious because the news media tends to focus heavily on events that are less common in real life. However, because the news covers them so extensively, it's an easy mistake to make.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


:: A close cousin to the AnecdotalFallacy. The SpotlightFallacy is making a generalization based on how much news coverage a subject gets. This is fallacious because the news media tends to focus heavily on events that are less common in real life. However, because the news covers them so extensively, it's an easy mistake to make.

to:

:: A close cousin to the AnecdotalFallacy.UsefulNotes/AnecdotalFallacy. The SpotlightFallacy is making a generalization based on how much news coverage a subject gets. This is fallacious because the news media tends to focus heavily on events that are less common in real life. However, because the news covers them so extensively, it's an easy mistake to make.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Many people assume by default (or joke) that all Catholic priests are [[PedophilePriest Pedophile Priests]], even though only a few dozen priests have been convicted for the crime of sexually assaulting children - the vast majority of Catholic priests who sexually assaulted people targeted vulnerable teenagers and adults (exclusively). Leaving aside the questions of why they did it (pleasure in controlling people, lust) and why the Church would do its damnedest to cover it up and avoid bringing the criminals to justice or compensating the victims (reputation to uphold, budget to balance, genuine faith criminals could be reformed) , this makes perfect sense: only a tiny minority of the population (1-2%) are sexually attracted to children. That this statistic should be reflected in the number of kids raped by Catholic priests is fair enough, when you think about it.

to:

* Many people assume by default (or joke) that all Catholic priests are [[PedophilePriest Pedophile Priests]], even though only a few dozen priests have been convicted for the crime of sexually assaulting children - the vast majority of Catholic priests who sexually assaulted people targeted vulnerable teenagers and adults (exclusively). Leaving aside the questions of why they did it (pleasure (delight in controlling holding such power over people, lack of empathy/compassion, lust) and why the Church would do its damnedest to cover it up and avoid bringing the criminals to justice or compensating the victims (reputation to uphold, budget to balance, genuine faith criminals could be reformed) , this makes perfect sense: only a tiny minority of the population (1-2%) are sexually attracted to children. That this statistic should be reflected in the number of kids raped by Catholic priests is fair enough, when you think about it.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Many people assume by default (or joke) that all Catholic priests are [[PedophilePriest Pedophile Priests]], even though only a few dozen priests actually sexually assaulted children - the vast majority of Catholic priests who sexually assaulted people targeted vulnerable teenagers and adults (exclusively). Leaving aside the questions of why they did it (pleasure in controlling people, lust) and why the Church would do its damnedest to cover it up and avoid bringing the criminals to justice or compensating the victims (reputation to uphold, budget to balance, genuine faith criminals could be reformed) , this makes perfect sense: only a tiny minority of the population (1-2%) are sexually attracted to children. That this statistic should be reflected in the number of kids raped by Catholic priests is fair enough, when you think about it.

to:

* Many people assume by default (or joke) that all Catholic priests are [[PedophilePriest Pedophile Priests]], even though only a few dozen priests actually have been convicted for the crime of sexually assaulted assaulting children - the vast majority of Catholic priests who sexually assaulted people targeted vulnerable teenagers and adults (exclusively). Leaving aside the questions of why they did it (pleasure in controlling people, lust) and why the Church would do its damnedest to cover it up and avoid bringing the criminals to justice or compensating the victims (reputation to uphold, budget to balance, genuine faith criminals could be reformed) , this makes perfect sense: only a tiny minority of the population (1-2%) are sexually attracted to children. That this statistic should be reflected in the number of kids raped by Catholic priests is fair enough, when you think about it.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Many people assume by default (or joke) that all Catholic priests are [[PedophilePriest Pedophile Priests]], thanks to a small number of scandals.

to:

* Many people assume by default (or joke) that all Catholic priests are [[PedophilePriest Pedophile Priests]], thanks even though only a few dozen priests actually sexually assaulted children - the vast majority of Catholic priests who sexually assaulted people targeted vulnerable teenagers and adults (exclusively). Leaving aside the questions of why they did it (pleasure in controlling people, lust) and why the Church would do its damnedest to cover it up and avoid bringing the criminals to justice or compensating the victims (reputation to uphold, budget to balance, genuine faith criminals could be reformed) , this makes perfect sense: only a small tiny minority of the population (1-2%) are sexually attracted to children. That this statistic should be reflected in the number of scandals.kids raped by Catholic priests is fair enough, when you think about it.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* School shootings are given extensive media coverage and are a common fear for parents; in fact, they are so rare that a child is more likely to be struck by lightning than to be shot.

to:

* School shootings are given extensive media coverage and are a common fear for parents; in fact, ''even in the USA'' they are so rare that a US child is more likely to be struck by lightning than to be shot.killed by a mass-murderer (let alone one who targets a school). Needless to say, for the 95% of us who don't live in the USA that chance is several dozen times less likely still - to the point that you'd be wiser to fear sharks and vending machines.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Whenever a band or musician becomes controversial, it's very common for parents/teachers to become scared and assume that one band/musician represents ''all'' popular music. Even though only a select few popular bands ever become controversial, and in many instances, the ones who do become controversial aren't nearly as popular as their constant media coverage would have you think.

to:

* Whenever a band or musician becomes controversial, it's very common for parents/teachers to become scared and assume that one band/musician represents ''all'' popular music. Even though only a select few popular bands ever become controversial, and in many instances, the ones who do become controversial aren't nearly as popular (or as outrageous) as their constant media coverage would have you think.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Summer of the Shark. Due to the national coverage of a shark attack on a young boy in 2001, coverage was given to every attack that happened for the next few months; and it only stopped because of 9/11. Shark attacks were actually down from 85 to 76, and there were on 5 shark-related deaths in 2001 compared to 12 the previous year. It has also been said that that was the lowest number of shark attacks in a decade.

to:

* Summer of the Shark. Due to the national coverage of a shark attack on a young boy in 2001, coverage was given to every attack that happened for the next few months; months, and it only stopped because of 9/11. Shark attacks were actually down from 85 to 76, and there were on only 5 shark-related deaths in 2001 compared to 12 the previous year. It has also been said that that was the lowest number of shark attacks in a decade.



* This fallacy can be exploited for advertising purposes. For example, for quite a while, virtually every computer in a movie or television show was a Mac, despite the fact that more people still use Windows.

to:

* This fallacy can be exploited for advertising purposes. For example, for quite a while, while virtually every computer in a movie or television show was a Mac, despite the fact that more people still use Windows.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Whenever a band or musician becomes controversial, it's very common for parents/teachers to become scared and assume that one group represents ''all'' popular music. Even though only a select few popular bands ever become controversial, and in many instances, the ones who do become controversial aren't nearly as popular as their constant media coverage would have you think.

to:

* Whenever a band or musician becomes controversial, it's very common for parents/teachers to become scared and assume that one group band/musician represents ''all'' popular music. Even though only a select few popular bands ever become controversial, and in many instances, the ones who do become controversial aren't nearly as popular as their constant media coverage would have you think.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Whenever a band or musician becomes controversial, it's very common for culturally out-of-touch parents/teachers to become scared and assume ''all'' modern-day popular music is this "offensive." Even though only a select few popular bands ever become controversial, and in many instances, the ones who do become controversial aren't nearly as popular as the media would have you think (witness, for example, the controversy that surrounded the song "Cop Killer" in 1992 - a song that was ''never even released as a single until after all its controversy died down'').

to:

* Whenever a band or musician becomes controversial, it's very common for culturally out-of-touch parents/teachers to become scared and assume that one group represents ''all'' modern-day popular music is this "offensive." music. Even though only a select few popular bands ever become controversial, and in many instances, the ones who do become controversial aren't nearly as popular as the their constant media coverage would have you think (witness, for example, the controversy that surrounded the song "Cop Killer" in 1992 - a song that was ''never even released as a single until after all its controversy died down'').think.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


:: A close cousin to the AnecdotalFallacy. The SpotlightFallacy is making a generalization based on how much news coverage a subject gets. This is fallacious because the news media tends to cover events that are less common than in real life, but it's an easy mistake to make.

to:

:: A close cousin to the AnecdotalFallacy. The SpotlightFallacy is making a generalization based on how much news coverage a subject gets. This is fallacious because the news media tends to cover focus heavily on events that are less common than in real life, but life. However, because the news covers them so extensively, it's an easy mistake to make.



Many people believe that events that occur often on TV are common in real life. Compare TheNewRockAndRoll.

to:

Many people believe that events that occur often on TV are common in real life. Compare TheNewRockAndRoll.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Whenever a band or musician becomes controversial, it's very common for culturally out-of-touch parents/teachers to become scared and assume ''all'' modern-day popular music is this "offensive." Even though only a select few popular bands ever become controversial, and in many instances, the ones who do become controversial aren't nearly as popular as the media would have you think (witness, for example, the controversy that surrounded the song "Cop Killer" in 1992 - a song that was ''never even released as a single until after it was pulled from its respective album'').

to:

* Whenever a band or musician becomes controversial, it's very common for culturally out-of-touch parents/teachers to become scared and assume ''all'' modern-day popular music is this "offensive." Even though only a select few popular bands ever become controversial, and in many instances, the ones who do become controversial aren't nearly as popular as the media would have you think (witness, for example, the controversy that surrounded the song "Cop Killer" in 1992 - a song that was ''never even released as a single until after it was pulled from all its respective album'').controversy died down'').
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Whenever a band or musician becomes controversial, it's very common for culturally out-of-touch parents to become scared and assume ''all'' modern-day popular music is this "offensive." Even though only a select few popular bands ever become controversial, and they may not even be as popular as the media would have you think (witness, for example, the controversy that surrounded the song "Cop Killer" in 1992 - even though the song was never even released as a single until after it was pulled from its respective album).

to:

* Whenever a band or musician becomes controversial, it's very common for culturally out-of-touch parents parents/teachers to become scared and assume ''all'' modern-day popular music is this "offensive." Even though only a select few popular bands ever become controversial, and they may not even be in many instances, the ones who do become controversial aren't nearly as popular as the media would have you think (witness, for example, the controversy that surrounded the song "Cop Killer" in 1992 - even though the a song that was never ''never even released as a single until after it was pulled from its respective album).album'').
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* Whenever a band or musician becomes controversial, it's very common for culturally out-of-touch parents to become scared and assume ''all'' modern-day popular music is this "offensive." Even though only a select few popular bands ever become controversial, and they may not even be as popular as the media would have you think (witness, for example, the controversy that surrounded the song "Cop Killer" in 1992 - even though the song was never even released as a single until after it was pulled from its respective album).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* Many people assume by default (or joke) that all Catholic priests are [[PedophilePriest Pedophile Priests]], thanks to a small number of scandals.

Added: 331

Changed: 186

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


:: A close cousin to the AnecdotalFallacy. The SpotlightFallacy is making a generalization based on how much news coverage a subject gets. This is fallacious because the news media tends to cover events that are less common than in real life, but it's an easy mistake to make. Many people believe that events that occur often on TV are common in real life. Compare TheNewRockAndRoll.

to:

:: A close cousin to the AnecdotalFallacy. The SpotlightFallacy is making a generalization based on how much news coverage a subject gets. This is fallacious because the news media tends to cover events that are less common than in real life, but it's an easy mistake to make.

It's said that "'Dog Bites Man' is not news; 'Man Bites Dog' is news." Using that example, this trope is when somebody assumes that men biting dogs is more common than the reverse, because it appears in the papers more often.

Many people believe that events that occur often on TV are common in real life. Compare TheNewRockAndRoll.



* Many people are scared of flying since plane crashes are covered almost every time one happens; car crashes are much rarer in the news. Multi-car pileups and fatalities are occasionally covered but still uncommon. But it is about 200 times more likely for a person to die in a car crash than in a plane crash.

to:

* Many people are scared of flying since plane crashes are covered almost every time one happens; car crashes are much rarer in the news. Multi-car pileups and fatalities are occasionally covered but still uncommon. But it is about 200 times more likely for a person to die in a car crash than in a plane crash.crash, even taking into account that people spend much more time driving than flying.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* This fallacy can be exploited for advertising purposes. For example, for quite a while, virtually every computer in a movie or television show was a Mac, despite the fact that more people still use Windows.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


:: A close cousin to the AnecdotalFallacy. The SpotlightFallacy is making a generalization based on how much news coverage a subject gets. This is fallacious because the news media tends to cover events that are less common than in real life, but it's an easy mistake to make. Many people believe that events that occur often on TV are common in real life.

to:

:: A close cousin to the AnecdotalFallacy. The SpotlightFallacy is making a generalization based on how much news coverage a subject gets. This is fallacious because the news media tends to cover events that are less common than in real life, but it's an easy mistake to make. Many people believe that events that occur often on TV are common in real life. Compare TheNewRockAndRoll.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* Summer of the Shark. Due to the national coverage of a shark attack on a young boy in 2001, coverage was given to every attack that happened for the next few months; and it only stopped because of 9/11. Shark attacks were actually down from 85 to 76, and there were on 5 shark-related deaths in 2001 compared to 12 the previous year. It has also been said that that was the lowest number of shark attacks in a decade.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


:: A close cousin to the AnecdotalFallacy. The SpotlightFallacy is making a generalization based on how much news coverage a subject gets. This is fallacious because the news media tends to cover events that are less common than in real life, but it's an easy mistake to make because its easy for people to confuse what happens most on t.v happens the most in real.

to:

:: A close cousin to the AnecdotalFallacy. The SpotlightFallacy is making a generalization based on how much news coverage a subject gets. This is fallacious because the news media tends to cover events that are less common than in real life, but it's an easy mistake to make because its easy for make. Many people to confuse what happens most believe that events that occur often on t.v happens the most TV are common in real.real life.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


:: A close cousin to the AnecdotalFallacy. The SpotlightFallacy is making a generalization based on how much news coverage a subject gets. This is fallacious because the news media tend to cover events that are less common, but for it's easy to make the mistake of thinking that what is seen the most in the news reflects what happens the most in real life.

to:

:: A close cousin to the AnecdotalFallacy. The SpotlightFallacy is making a generalization based on how much news coverage a subject gets. This is fallacious because the news media tend tends to cover events that are less common, common than in real life, but for it's an easy mistake to make the mistake of thinking that because its easy for people to confuse what is seen the happens most in the news reflects what on t.v happens the most in real life.real.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* Parents are terrified of their children being abducted by strangers, due to overwhelming coverage of such events (think Elizabeth Smart). However, the ''vast'' majority of kidnappings are committed by immediate family members or close friends.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Many people are scared of flying since plane crashes are covered almost every time one happens; car crashes are much rarer in the news. Multi-car pileups and fatalities are occasionally covered but still uncommon. But it is more likely for a person to die in a car crash than in a plane crash.

to:

* Many people are scared of flying since plane crashes are covered almost every time one happens; car crashes are much rarer in the news. Multi-car pileups and fatalities are occasionally covered but still uncommon. But it is about 200 times more likely for a person to die in a car crash than in a plane crash.

Top