Follow TV Tropes

Following

History Main / INeverSaidItWasPoison

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* A ''NancyDrew'' book had a JerkAss character being poisoned, but ultimately recovering. A few days later, his ex-girlfriend taunts him about as he tries to eat breakfast, stating, "You know, poison doesn't have to be a powder. Something could have been injected into that orange. . ." The only way she could have know what type of poison was used was if she was the assailant. So [[QuoteMine just take out the "doesn't have to be" part]], and she almost looks like there's a chance that she [[RuleOfThree might have]] known what kind of poison the original was.

to:

* A ''NancyDrew'' book had a JerkAss character being poisoned, but ultimately recovering. A few days later, his ex-girlfriend taunts him about as he tries to eat breakfast, stating, "You know, poison doesn't have to be a powder. Something could have been injected into that orange. . ." The only way she could have know what type of poison was used was if she was the assailant. So [[QuoteMine just take out the Just change "doesn't have to be" part]], to "wasn't"]] and she almost looks like there's a chance you've got an admission of guilt that she [[RuleOfThree might have]] known what kind of poison the original was.still wouldn't stand in trial.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* A ''NancyDrew'' book had a JerkAss character being poisoned, but ultimately recovering. A few days later, his ex-girlfriend taunts him about as he tries to eat breakfast, stating, "You know, poison doesn't have to be a powder. Something could have been injected into that orange. . ." The only way she could have know what type of poison was used was if she was the assailant.

to:

* A ''NancyDrew'' book had a JerkAss character being poisoned, but ultimately recovering. A few days later, his ex-girlfriend taunts him about as he tries to eat breakfast, stating, "You know, poison doesn't have to be a powder. Something could have been injected into that orange. . ." The only way she could have know what type of poison was used was if she was the assailant. So [[QuoteMine just take out the "doesn't have to be" part]], and she almost looks like there's a chance that she [[RuleOfThree might have]] known what kind of poison the original was.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


This trope must be handled carefully; when sloppily done it's likely to turn what should be a dramatic moment into a FridgeLogic. The most common mistake is making the piece of information something that the person who makes the "slip" could reasonably have found out without committing the offense. The second most common mistake is making the "slip" an assumption that could reasonably be made even by an innocent person. It's also quite doubtful that anyone who committed the crime and isn't particularly scatterbrained would forget what they were and weren't told.

to:

This trope must be handled carefully; when sloppily done it's likely to turn what should be a dramatic moment into a FridgeLogic. The most common mistake is making the piece of information something that the person who makes the "slip" could reasonably have found out without committing the offense. The second most common mistake is making the "slip" an assumption that could reasonably be made even by an innocent person. It's also quite doubtful that anyone who committed the crime and isn't particularly scatterbrained would forget what they were and weren't told.
person.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


This trope must be handled carefully; when sloppily done it's likely to turn what should be a dramatic moment into a FridgeLogic. The most common mistake is making the piece of information something that the person who makes the "slip" could reasonably have found out without committing the offense. The second most common mistake is making the "slip" an assumption that could reasonably be made even by an innocent person.

to:

This trope must be handled carefully; when sloppily done it's likely to turn what should be a dramatic moment into a FridgeLogic. The most common mistake is making the piece of information something that the person who makes the "slip" could reasonably have found out without committing the offense. The second most common mistake is making the "slip" an assumption that could reasonably be made even by an innocent person.
person. It's also quite doubtful that anyone who committed the crime and isn't particularly scatterbrained would forget what they were and weren't told.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


The usual response to a perp SayingTooMuch. The perp, while maintaining his innocence, reveals information he could not possibly have known if he were innocent, usually the [[SayingTooMuch specific details of a murder]]. It can take the form of a SuspiciouslySpecificDenial. For full dramatic effect, the interrogator does not immediately point out this discrepancy, but continues the interview, often saving the kicker to the very end, as a sort of AndAnotherThing epilogue. Even more dramatically, the interrogator may insist is ''wasn't'' poison and then probe the perp's reaction to this lie.

to:

The usual response to a perp SayingTooMuch. The perp, while maintaining his innocence, reveals information he could not possibly have known if he were innocent, usually the [[SayingTooMuch specific details of a murder]]. It can take the form of a SuspiciouslySpecificDenial. For full dramatic effect, the interrogator does not immediately point out this discrepancy, but continues the interview, often saving the kicker to the very end, as a sort of AndAnotherThing epilogue. Even more dramatically, the interrogator may insist is it ''wasn't'' poison and then probe the perp's reaction to this lie.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


The usual response to a perp SayingTooMuch. The perp, while maintaining his innocence, reveals information he could not possibly have known if he were innocent, usually the [[SayingTooMuch specific details of a murder]]. It can take the form of a SuspiciouslySpecificDenial. For full dramatic effect, the interrogator does not immediately point out this discrepancy, but continues the interview, often saving the kicker to the very end, as a sort of AndAnotherThing epilogue.

to:

The usual response to a perp SayingTooMuch. The perp, while maintaining his innocence, reveals information he could not possibly have known if he were innocent, usually the [[SayingTooMuch specific details of a murder]]. It can take the form of a SuspiciouslySpecificDenial. For full dramatic effect, the interrogator does not immediately point out this discrepancy, but continues the interview, often saving the kicker to the very end, as a sort of AndAnotherThing epilogue.
epilogue. Even more dramatically, the interrogator may insist is ''wasn't'' poison and then probe the perp's reaction to this lie.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

* In Katherine Kurtz's ''The Quest for Saint Camber'', a member of the secretive Camberian Council is found dead in a secret passageway of the king's palace. In a conversation with Nigel (King Kelson's uncle/regent/heir presumptive), his eldest son Conall says the victim's entire name, which the younger man is not supposed to know. Nigel realizes Conall had been secretly working with the dead man (to obtain arcane powers reserved for the monarch) and killed him in that stairwell; Conall attacks his father with those powers and leaves him in a coma.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

* In ''LANoire'', the DLC case "[[MeaningfulName A Slip of the Tongue]]" features one of these. If Phelps and Bekowski manage to catch up to Jean Archer, they'll mention Belasco (another suspect, [[spoiler: and Archer's accomplice]]). She later drops his full name "James Belasco", which confirms to Phelps that she's connected to the case.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* In ''ProfessorLaytonAndTheDiabolicalBox'', [[spoiler:the fake "Flora"]] is revealed when he looks at a photograph of the the Elysian Box and mentions [[spoiler:the cute goat on it. The picture was missing a piece that identifies the emblem as a goat (it looks more like a frog without it), meaning "Flora" had seen the mysterious box before, making him the thief]].

to:

* In ''ProfessorLaytonAndTheDiabolicalBox'', [[spoiler:the fake "Flora"]] is revealed when he looks at a photograph of the the Elysian Box and mentions [[spoiler:the cute goat on it. The picture was missing a piece that identifies the emblem as a goat (it looks more like a frog without it), meaning "Flora" had seen the mysterious box before, making him the thief]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

* In ''ProfessorLaytonAndTheDiabolicalBox'', [[spoiler:the fake "Flora"]] is revealed when he looks at a photograph of the the Elysian Box and mentions [[spoiler:the cute goat on it. The picture was missing a piece that identifies the emblem as a goat (it looks more like a frog without it), meaning "Flora" had seen the mysterious box before, making him the thief]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* In an episode of Warehouse13, an agent is discovered murdered under strange circumstances, and the team tracks down his old girlfriend to ask her some questions, during which she asks whether there have been any more electrocutions. Later, they realize nobody ever ''mentioned'' he was killed by electrocution. (Turns out she was also a warehouse agent, who ran off when her boyfriend was killed during an investigation, and knows exactly what did it.)

to:

* In an episode of Warehouse13, ''{{Warehouse 13}}'', an agent is discovered murdered under strange circumstances, and the team tracks down his old girlfriend to ask her some questions, during which she asks whether there have been any more electrocutions. Later, they realize nobody ever ''mentioned'' he was killed by electrocution. (Turns out she was also a warehouse agent, who ran off when her boyfriend was killed during an investigation, and knows exactly what did it.)
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

* In an episode of Warehouse13, an agent is discovered murdered under strange circumstances, and the team tracks down his old girlfriend to ask her some questions, during which she asks whether there have been any more electrocutions. Later, they realize nobody ever ''mentioned'' he was killed by electrocution. (Turns out she was also a warehouse agent, who ran off when her boyfriend was killed during an investigation, and knows exactly what did it.)
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Colonel Graff does a slip up on the phone to Bean's caretaker (a very intelligent nun) when he says the name Bean told him about Achilles (pronounced uh-kill-eez). The nun points out that since Bean is from the French section of Rotterdam he would have pronounced it ah-sheel and correctly calls him out for spying on Bean's journal.

Added: 111

Changed: 5

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Minor edits and Fridge Logic


* In ''Wild Child'', when Poppy is before the Honour Court for setting fire to the school, head girl Harriet accidentally reveals that she was actually the one who started the fire, by talking about the very specific ligther that Poppy supposedly used when no one has mentioned anything about a ligther.

to:

* In ''Wild Child'', when Poppy is before the Honour Court for setting fire to the school, head girl Harriet accidentally reveals that she was actually the one who started the fire, by talking about the very specific ligther that Poppy supposedly used when no one has mentioned anything about a ligther.lighter.



** One story had Encyclopedia figuring out which member of a gang robbed a grocery store, his only piece of evidence being a knife left stuck into a watermelon. When confronting the gang, one of the members says his knife is an inch longer...despite the knife never having been taken out of the melon, and the watermelon specifically having been described as "huge" so that even the longer knifeblade would still be completely hidden.
** Another EncyclopediaBrown story has someone getting shot in the foot by a BB gun. One of Bugs' friends shows up an Encyclopedia tells him to run to the kid's house and get his shoe. The kid grabs the correct shoe, and Encyclopedia points out that unless he was the one who shot him, he couldn't have known which shoe to get.

to:

** One story had Encyclopedia figuring out which member of a gang robbed a grocery store, his only piece of evidence being a knife left stuck into a watermelon. When confronting the gang, one of the members says his knife is an inch longer...despite the knife never having been taken out of the melon, and the watermelon specifically having been described as "huge" so that even the longer knifeblade knife blade would still be completely hidden.
** Another EncyclopediaBrown story has someone getting shot in the foot by a BB gun. One of Bugs' friends shows up an up, and Encyclopedia tells him to run to the kid's house and get his shoe. The kid grabs the correct shoe, and Encyclopedia points out that unless he was the one who shot him, he couldn't have known which shoe to get.


Added DiffLines:

**** Or he could have just grabbed both shoes, which would probably have been sitting right next to each other.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Explicitly [[LampshadeHanging lampshaded]] in ''LawAndOrderLosAngeles when the prosecutor asks the defendant, a Secret Service agent, if based on his long career and investigations that he'd agree that a suspect displaying knowledge of the crime was probably guilty. Defendant says yes. Prosecutor presents the text messages (sent from a smartphone they'd found concealed in the defendant's cell) to the victims' husband/father revealing information that only someone present in the house just before the attack would have known.

to:

** Explicitly [[LampshadeHanging lampshaded]] in ''LawAndOrderLosAngeles ''LawAndOrderLosAngeles'' when the prosecutor asks the defendant, a Secret Service agent, if based on his long career and investigations that he'd agree that a suspect displaying knowledge of the crime was probably guilty. Defendant says yes. Prosecutor presents the text messages (sent from a smartphone they'd found concealed in the defendant's cell) to the victims' husband/father revealing information that only someone present in the house just before the attack would have known.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Explicitly [[LampshadeHanging lampshaded]] in ''LawAndOrderLosAngeles]] when the prosecutor asks the defendant, a Secret Service agent, if based on his long career and investigations that he'd agree that a suspect displaying knowledge of the crime was probably guilty. Defendant says yes. Prosecutor presents the text messages (sent from a smartphone they'd found concealed in the defendant's cell) to the victims' husband/father revealing information that only someone present in the house just before the attack would have known.

to:

** Explicitly [[LampshadeHanging lampshaded]] in ''LawAndOrderLosAngeles]] ''LawAndOrderLosAngeles when the prosecutor asks the defendant, a Secret Service agent, if based on his long career and investigations that he'd agree that a suspect displaying knowledge of the crime was probably guilty. Defendant says yes. Prosecutor presents the text messages (sent from a smartphone they'd found concealed in the defendant's cell) to the victims' husband/father revealing information that only someone present in the house just before the attack would have known.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Used again in "The Time Meddler" when the Meddling Monk (who is holding the Doctor prisoner) claims that he hasn't seen the Doctor but gives himself away by knowing what the Doctor looks like without Steven having told him.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

*** We know what you're thinking: [[EncyclopediaBrowned There was a 50/50 chance of him getting the right shoe]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

->''It's called guilty knowledge, and juries eat it up.''
-->-- Captain Stottlemeyer, ''{{Monk}}''
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* In ''{{Persona 4}}'', [[spoiler:Adachi]] reveals himself by saying that he thought everyone was sure that "[[spoiler:Namatame]] put them in [the television]" -- no one but the murderer and the protagonists could have known that that was how the victims were killed. He had also cast suspicion on himself in an earlier instance when the protagonists [[spoiler:find a list of everyone that Nametame had put into the television: Adachi shows no surprise at the contents of the list despite the fact that it was comprised of people who were rescued before being murdered (and were therefore classed as mere "disappearances" that had no relation to the murders).]]

to:

* In ''{{Persona 4}}'', [[spoiler:Adachi]] reveals himself by saying that he thought everyone was sure that "[[spoiler:Namatame]] put them in [the television]" -- no one but the murderer and the protagonists could have known that that was how the victims were killed. He had also cast suspicion on himself in an earlier instance when the protagonists [[spoiler:find a list of everyone that Nametame Namatame had put into the television: Adachi shows no surprise at the contents of the list despite the fact that it was comprised of included people who were rescued before being murdered (and were therefore classed as mere "disappearances" that had no relation to the murders).]]
Camacan MOD

Added: 524

Changed: 1062

Removed: 18

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Folderize.


This trope must be handled carefully; when sloppily done it's likely to turn what should be a dramatic moment into a FridgeLogic. The most common mistake is making the piece of information something that the person who makes the "slip" could reasonably have found out without committing the offense. The second most common mistake is making the "slip" an assumption that could reasonably be made even by an innocent person.

to:

This trope must be handled carefully; when sloppily done it's likely to turn what should be a dramatic moment into a FridgeLogic. The most common mistake is making the piece of information something that the person who makes the "slip" could reasonably have found out without committing the offense. The second most common mistake is making the "slip" an assumption that could reasonably be made even by an innocent person.
person.



[[AC:{{Anime}} and {{Manga}}]]

to:

[[AC:{{Anime}} [[foldercontrol]]

[[folder: Anime
and {{Manga}}]]Manga ]]



[[AC:ComicBooks]]

to:

[[AC:ComicBooks]][[/folder]]

[[folder: Comic Books ]]



* In {{Transmetropolitan}}, our heroic journalist accuses the presidential candidate of killing his aide, to which the response is along the lines of "Of course we wouldn't kill her, she was a friend and a vital part of the campaign". See there how they admit that murdering some people would be okay in their book.

[[AC:{{Film}}]]

to:

* In {{Transmetropolitan}}, our heroic journalist accuses the presidential candidate of killing his aide, to which the response is along the lines of "Of course we wouldn't kill her, she was a friend and a vital part of the campaign". See there how they admit that murdering some people would be okay in their book.

[[AC:{{Film}}]]
book.

[[/folder]]

[[folder: Film ]]



* In ''TheCountOfMonteCristo'', Mercedes realizes that the mysterious Count really is Edmond when he tells her that "Edmond Dantes is dead." She had told him that her love was dead, but not his name.

to:

* In ''TheCountOfMonteCristo'', Mercedes realizes that the mysterious Count really is Edmond when he tells her that "Edmond Dantes is dead." She had told him that her love was dead, but not his name.



[[AC:{{Literature}}]]

to:

[[AC:{{Literature}}]][[/folder]]

[[folder: Literature ]]



* In JoWalton's novel ''Farthing'', the murder victim appears to have been stabbed. The police forensic techs figure out that he actually died of carbon monoxide poisoning, but don't reveal this to the press. A bit later, one character reveals that they know that the victim was gassed.

to:

* In JoWalton's novel ''Farthing'', the murder victim appears to have been stabbed. The police forensic techs figure out that he actually died of carbon monoxide poisoning, but don't reveal this to the press. A bit later, one character reveals that they know that the victim was gassed.



[[AC:LiveActionTV]]

to:

[[AC:LiveActionTV]][[/folder]]

[[folder: Live Action TV ]]



::: The victim had been stabbed in the head.

to:

::: The victim had been stabbed in the head.



** An example from season 2: A woman with amnesia comments that "someone bashed that poor man's head in," when no one had told her how the man was killed. Unfortunately, by the time Kate realizes this, it's too late.
* Subverted on ''HomicideLifeOnTheStreet'': In the episode "Bad Medicine," Detective Lewis tells VillainWithGoodPublicity Luther Mahoney that a recently deceased thug obviously committed suicide. Mahoney scoffs, pointing out that the victim was shot in the back of the head and the gun was left on the table next to him. Lewis gleefully pounces, proclaiming that neither piece of information was released to the public and placing Mahoney under arrest. In the end, though, the state's attorney figures that there are any number of ways Mahoney could have learned it, too many to be beyond reasonable doubt.
* Inverted on ''TheWire'': The detectives show one of the perps a bag with three guns saying that they found his fingerprints on one of them. The perp knows that they cleaned them, so asks the detectives which one it is. They point to another gun.

to:

** An example from season 2: A woman with amnesia comments that "someone bashed that poor man's head in," when no one had told her how the man was killed. Unfortunately, by the time Kate realizes this, it's too late.
late.
* Subverted on ''HomicideLifeOnTheStreet'': In the episode "Bad Medicine," Detective Lewis tells VillainWithGoodPublicity Luther Mahoney that a recently deceased thug obviously committed suicide. Mahoney scoffs, pointing out that the victim was shot in the back of the head and the gun was left on the table next to him. Lewis gleefully pounces, proclaiming that neither piece of information was released to the public and placing Mahoney under arrest. In the end, though, the state's attorney figures that there are any number of ways Mahoney could have learned it, too many to be beyond reasonable doubt.
doubt.
* Inverted on ''TheWire'': The detectives show one of the perps a bag with three guns saying that they found his fingerprints on one of them. The perp knows that they cleaned them, so asks the detectives which one it is. They point to another gun.



[[AC:Mythology]]
* The Cranes of Ibycus is a classic example of this trope making it OlderThanDirt. According to legend ancient Greek poet Ibycus was murdered by bandits on his way to Isthmian Games. Only the Cranes flying above witnessed the murder. Later the criminals gave themselves away by pointing out 'The Cranes of Ibycus' to one another in public.

[[AC:Radio]]
* A "Five Minute Mystery" titled [[http://www.otr.net/r/fmin/74.ram The Return of Mr. Lawrence]] plays it by the book: a murdered woman's maid accuses the woman's former husband of poisoning her. The police never said it was poison.

to:

[[AC:Mythology]]
[[/folder]]

[[folder: Mythology ]]

* The Cranes of Ibycus is a classic example of this trope making it OlderThanDirt. According to legend ancient Greek poet Ibycus was murdered by bandits on his way to Isthmian Games. Only the Cranes flying above witnessed the murder. Later the criminals gave themselves away by pointing out 'The Cranes of Ibycus' to one another in public.

[[AC:Radio]]
public.

[[/folder]]

[[folder: Radio ]]

* A "Five Minute Mystery" titled [[http://www.otr.net/r/fmin/74.ram The Return of Mr. Lawrence]] plays it by the book: a murdered woman's maid accuses the woman's former husband of poisoning her. The police never said it was poison.



[[AC:{{Theater}}]]

to:

[[AC:{{Theater}}]][[/folder]]

[[folder: Theater ]]



[[AC:VideoGames]]

to:

[[AC:VideoGames]][[/folder]]

[[folder: Video Games ]]



[[AC:WebComics]]

to:

[[AC:WebComics]][[/folder]]

[[folder: Web Comics ]]



[[AC:WebOriginal]]

to:

[[AC:WebOriginal]][[/folder]]

[[folder: Web Original ]]



[[AC:WesternAnimation]]

to:

[[AC:WesternAnimation]][[/folder]]

[[folder: Western Animation ]]



[[AC:RealLife]]

to:

[[AC:RealLife]][[/folder]]

[[folder: Real Life ]]




to:

[[/folder]]



<<|TheOldestTricksInTheBook|>>
<<|PerpSweating|>>

to:

<<|TheOldestTricksInTheBook|>>
<<|PerpSweating|>>
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Used, in a rather lame piece of writing, to determine the Dean's real murderer in ''VeronicaMars''.

to:

* Used, in a rather lame piece of writing, Used to determine the Dean's real murderer in ''VeronicaMars''.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

* ''Scream 4'': [[spoiler: Jill turns herself in when she comments about having a similar wound as Gale, a fact only the one who attacked her could know.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


-->'''Lassiter:''' Hang on a minute! I don't believe anyone said the witness' name. You're under arrest.\

to:

-->'''Lassiter:''' Hang on a minute! I don't believe anyone said the witness' name. You're under arrest.\


Added DiffLines:

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Explicitly [[LampshadeHanging lampshaded]] in ''LawAndOrderLosAngeles]] when the prosecutor asks the defendant, a Secret Service agent, if based on his long career and investigations that he'd agree that a suspect displaying knowledge of the crime was probably guilty. Defendant says yes. Prosecutor presents the text messages (sent from a smartphone they'd found concealed in the defendant's cell) to the victims' husband/father revealing information that only someone present in the house just before the attack would have known.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
No, it wasn\'t.


** Subverted, in that it was deliberate.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


-->'''Moe/Claudius (nervously to Gertrude/Marge):''' Do you have diarrhoea? I have diarrhoea... ''[tries to leave]''

to:

-->'''Moe/Claudius (nervously to Gertrude/Marge):''' Do you have diarrhoea? diarrhea? I have diarrhoea...diarrhea... ''[tries to leave]''

Added: 40

Changed: 165

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


-->'''Bridget:''' You're a liar, Malcolm Reynolds!

to:

-->'''Bridget:''' -->'''"Bridget":''' You're a liar, Malcolm Reynolds!



** Subverted, in that it was deliberate.





to:

\n* ''HomeAndAway'' had a guest character accidentally incriminate herself by identifying a fishing knife as a murder weapon. The police just called it a ''knife''.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** One episode had him find a witness, but it was a blind man. So they bring the suspect in, and [[spoiler:have a guy in shades walk in, sit down, and identify the suspect as leaving the murder scene right after the murder. The suspect, a psychologist, claims to be able to use his medical training to tell the man is blind, and hands him a newspaper...which he reads perfectly. Columbo reveals it's actually the blind man's similar-looking brother, and there was no way the suspect should've thought he was blind.]]

to:

** One episode had him find a witness, but it was a blind man. So they bring the suspect in, and [[spoiler:have a guy in shades walk in, sit down, and identify the suspect as leaving the murder scene right after the murder. The suspect, a psychologist, claims to be able to use his medical training to tell the man is blind, and hands him a newspaper...which he reads perfectly. Columbo reveals it's actually the blind man's similar-looking brother, and there was no way the suspect should've thought he was blind. Unless, of course, he had seen him while fleeing the scene of the crime.]]

Top