Follow TV Tropes

Following

History Main / HitSoHardTheCalendarFeltIt

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Regnal dating, combined with the loss of historical records for ''entire periods of reign'' makes the [[UsefulNotes/AncientEgyptianHistory Egyptian dynastic timeline]] a matter of ''extremely'' hot debate in Egyptology circles. While some gaps are simply due to the loss of records over time, others are due to various pharaohs [[UnPerson purging the official records of any mention of their rivals or predecessors, and deliberately destroying or defacing monuments]]. It also doesn't help that the Egyptians had a strong aversion--bordering on a taboo--towards stating the date or circumstances of royal deaths in the annals and the royal funerary texts and inscriptions. Thus what would be a pretty normal, even standard, entry in the annals of most other historical monarchies--"His Majesty died in the twenty-fifth year of his reign of [[Literature/TenSixtySixAndAllThat a surfeit of palfreys]]"--would be a marvelous find (suspiciously marvelous, in fact) for an Egyptologist.

to:

** Regnal dating, combined with the loss of historical records for ''entire periods of reign'' makes the [[UsefulNotes/AncientEgyptianHistory Egyptian dynastic timeline]] a matter of ''extremely'' hot debate in Egyptology circles. While some gaps are simply due to the loss of records over time, others are due to various pharaohs [[UnPerson purging the official records of any mention of their rivals or predecessors, and deliberately destroying or defacing monuments]]. It also doesn't help that the Egyptians had a strong aversion--bordering aversion to--bordering on a taboo--towards stating taboo against--stating the date or circumstances of royal deaths in the annals and the royal funerary texts and inscriptions. inscriptions.[[note]]They usually didn't even depict the funeral in the extensive tomb decorations. Generally, the depictions would jump from "the deceased doing the awesome stuff they did in life" to "the deceased's journey from this tomb to the afterlife" without any details about how they got from the awesome stuff to the tomb. UsefulNotes/{{Tutankhamun}}'s tomb is ''very'' unusual for showing his successor Ay presiding over his funeral.[[/note]] Thus what would be a pretty normal, even standard, entry in the annals of most other historical monarchies--"His Majesty died in the twenty-fifth year of his reign of [[Literature/TenSixtySixAndAllThat a surfeit of palfreys]]"--would be a marvelous find (suspiciously marvelous, in fact) for an Egyptologist.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* [[DownplayedTrope Downplayed]] in WebVideo/TheTourettesGuy: Danny says a [[AtomicFBomb great big “PISS!”]] so loudly the calendar flips it's page.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Regnal dating, combined with the loss of historical records for ''entire periods of reign'' makes the [[UsefulNotes/AncientEgyptianHistory Egyptian dynastic timeline]] a matter of ''extremely'' hot debate in Egyptology circles. While some gaps are simply due to the loss of records over time, others are due to various pharaohs [[UnPerson purging the official records of any mention of their rivals or predecessors, and deliberately destroying or defacing monuments]]. It also doesn't help that the Egyptians had a strong aversion--bordering on a taboo--towards stating the date or circumstances of royal deaths in the annals and the royal funerary texts and inscriptions. Thus what would be a pretty normal, even standandard, entry in the annals of most other historical monarchies--"His Majesty died in the twenty-fifth year of his reign of [[Literature/TenSixtySixAndAllThat a surfeit of palfreys]]"--would be a marvelous find (suspiciously marvelous, in fact) for an Egyptologist.

to:

** Regnal dating, combined with the loss of historical records for ''entire periods of reign'' makes the [[UsefulNotes/AncientEgyptianHistory Egyptian dynastic timeline]] a matter of ''extremely'' hot debate in Egyptology circles. While some gaps are simply due to the loss of records over time, others are due to various pharaohs [[UnPerson purging the official records of any mention of their rivals or predecessors, and deliberately destroying or defacing monuments]]. It also doesn't help that the Egyptians had a strong aversion--bordering on a taboo--towards stating the date or circumstances of royal deaths in the annals and the royal funerary texts and inscriptions. Thus what would be a pretty normal, even standandard, standard, entry in the annals of most other historical monarchies--"His Majesty died in the twenty-fifth year of his reign of [[Literature/TenSixtySixAndAllThat a surfeit of palfreys]]"--would be a marvelous find (suspiciously marvelous, in fact) for an Egyptologist.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Regnal dating, combined with the loss of historical records for ''entire periods of reign'' makes the [[UsefulNotes/AncientEgyptianHistory Egyptian dynastic timeline]] a matter of ''extremely'' hot debate in Egyptology circles. While some gaps are simply due to the loss of records over time, others are due to various pharaohs [[UnPerson purging the official records of any mention of their rivals or predecessors, and deliberately destroying or defacing monuments]]. It also doesn't help that the Egyptians had a strong aversion--bordering on a taboo--towards stating the date or circumstances of royal deaths in the annals and the royal funerary texts and inscriptions. Thus what would be a pretty normal, even standandard, entry in the annals of most other historical monarchies--"His Majesty died in the twenty-fifth year of his reign of [[Literature/1066AndAllThat a surfeit of palfreys]]"--would be a marvelous find (suspiciously marvelous, in fact) for an Egyptologist.

to:

** Regnal dating, combined with the loss of historical records for ''entire periods of reign'' makes the [[UsefulNotes/AncientEgyptianHistory Egyptian dynastic timeline]] a matter of ''extremely'' hot debate in Egyptology circles. While some gaps are simply due to the loss of records over time, others are due to various pharaohs [[UnPerson purging the official records of any mention of their rivals or predecessors, and deliberately destroying or defacing monuments]]. It also doesn't help that the Egyptians had a strong aversion--bordering on a taboo--towards stating the date or circumstances of royal deaths in the annals and the royal funerary texts and inscriptions. Thus what would be a pretty normal, even standandard, entry in the annals of most other historical monarchies--"His Majesty died in the twenty-fifth year of his reign of [[Literature/1066AndAllThat [[Literature/TenSixtySixAndAllThat a surfeit of palfreys]]"--would be a marvelous find (suspiciously marvelous, in fact) for an Egyptologist.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Regnal dating, combined with the loss of historical records for ''entire periods of reign'' makes the [[UsefulNotes/AncientEgyptianHistory Egyptian dynastic timeline]] a matter of ''extremely'' hot debate in Egyptology circles. While some gaps are simply due to the loss of records over time, others are due to various pharaohs [[UnPerson purging the official records of any mention of their rivals or predecessors, and deliberately destroying or defacing monuments]].

to:

** Regnal dating, combined with the loss of historical records for ''entire periods of reign'' makes the [[UsefulNotes/AncientEgyptianHistory Egyptian dynastic timeline]] a matter of ''extremely'' hot debate in Egyptology circles. While some gaps are simply due to the loss of records over time, others are due to various pharaohs [[UnPerson purging the official records of any mention of their rivals or predecessors, and deliberately destroying or defacing monuments]]. It also doesn't help that the Egyptians had a strong aversion--bordering on a taboo--towards stating the date or circumstances of royal deaths in the annals and the royal funerary texts and inscriptions. Thus what would be a pretty normal, even standandard, entry in the annals of most other historical monarchies--"His Majesty died in the twenty-fifth year of his reign of [[Literature/1066AndAllThat a surfeit of palfreys]]"--would be a marvelous find (suspiciously marvelous, in fact) for an Egyptologist.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** The Romans did not usually use a continuous numbering system for their years, the way we do. Unique years were identified with reference to the political leadership of the state. Under the monarchy, this meant regnal years (the Xth year of King Y's reign). Under the Republic, they referred to the years as "[the year] ''X'' and ''Y'' being consul," which, naturally, [[ExactlyWhatItSaysOnTheTin was the year when the two individuals in question were consul]]. (During UsefulNotes/JuliusCaesar's first consulate in 59 BCE, his co-consul Bibulus was so unpopular and so thoroughly stymied in his first attempt to seriously exercise consular power early in the year[[note]]Within a month of their taking office, Caesar had called a vote of the Plebeian Assembly on his signature piece of legislation, a land reform bill. Bibulus showed up to the assembly to veto the vote, but the crowd attacked him and dumped feces on his head, at which point Bibulus and his conservative supporters (including Cato) departed. Bibulus claimed that he was vetoing the proceedings the entire time, but Caesar claimed that even if Bibulus had been doing that, neither he nor anyone else could hear him over the roar of the crowd. Bibulus was unpopular enough (and Caesar popular enough) that we really can't tell what actually happened. It also raised a question of Roman law which the Romans never got around to answering--is a consul's veto effective when the consul issues it or when it is received and understood by the official whose actions are being vetoed?[[/note]] that he retreated to his house for the rest of his term; this left the field solely to Caesar, and people jokingly started to call 59 BCE "the year of Julius and Caesar being consul.") The consular-year naming continued after Augustus overthrew the Republic and established the Principate form of the Empire (in which the Republic nominally still ran like it used to and the Emperor was JustTheFirstCitizen). However, after the Crisis of the Third Century, Diocletian's Dominate (basically the Empire saying, "why yes the Emperor is a king"), regnal years came back into use. When the Romans had to use a continuously-numbered calendar (e.g. in histories), they counted years from the foundation of the city of Rome -- ''AbUrbeCondita'' or A.V.C.

to:

** The Romans did not usually use a continuous numbering system for their years, the way we do. Unique years were identified with reference to the political leadership of the state. Under the monarchy, this meant regnal years (the Xth year of King Y's reign). Under the Republic, they referred to the years as "[the year] ''X'' and ''Y'' being consul," which, naturally, [[ExactlyWhatItSaysOnTheTin was the year when the two individuals in question were consul]]. (During UsefulNotes/JuliusCaesar's first consulate in 59 BCE, his co-consul Bibulus was so unpopular and so thoroughly stymied in his first attempt to seriously exercise consular power early in the year[[note]]Within a month of their taking office, Caesar had called a vote of the Plebeian Assembly on his signature piece of legislation, a land reform bill. Bibulus showed up to the assembly to veto the vote, but the crowd attacked him and dumped feces on his head, at which point Bibulus and his conservative supporters (including Cato) departed. Bibulus claimed that he was vetoing the proceedings the entire time, but Caesar claimed that even if Bibulus had been doing that, neither he nor anyone else could hear him over the roar of the crowd. Bibulus was unpopular enough (and Caesar popular enough) that we really can't tell what actually happened. It also raised a question of Roman law which the Romans never got around to answering--is a consul's veto effective when the consul issues it or when it is received and understood by the official whose actions are being vetoed?[[/note]] that he retreated to his house for the rest of his term; this left the field solely to Caesar, and people jokingly started to call 59 BCE "the year of Julius and Caesar being consul.") ")[[note]]The Romans loved this kind of simultaneously exaggerated and understated humor; one imagines that if you dropped a Roman into modern UsefulNotes/{{Australia}} with a working knowledge of English they'd find themselves right at home.[[/note]] The consular-year naming continued after Augustus overthrew the Republic and established the Principate form of the Empire (in which the Republic nominally still ran like it used to and the Emperor was JustTheFirstCitizen). However, after the Crisis of the Third Century, Diocletian's Dominate (basically the Empire saying, "why yes the Emperor is a king"), regnal years came back into use. When the Romans had to use a continuously-numbered calendar (e.g. in histories), they counted years from the foundation of the city of Rome -- ''AbUrbeCondita'' or A.V.C.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* ''Website/{{Neopets}}'' uses years since the launch of the website for its in-universe calendar, with YearZero being 1998 (the year the site was in development, but not live). It's unknown what calendar was used in-universe before then, but events that happened before that time are referred to as "BN" (Before [the discovery of] Neopia). For instance, if the Esophagor tells you that a given neopet that the Brain Tree wants to document died in 26 BN, they died in 1972.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** On a smaller scale, though the Third Age continues for some years afterward, Gondor under King Aragorn declares a new year to have begun on the day of the Ring's destruction (March 25 in the Shire reckoning) and dates its own calendar from that point going forward.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


[[folder: Live-Action TV]]

to:

[[folder: Live-Action [[folder:Live-Action TV]]



[[folder: Video Games]]

to:

[[folder: Video [[folder:Video Games]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


*** At some point, the Romans decided that this business of having unassigne time wasn't on for whatever reason. This time was thus divided into two new months at the end of the year, ''Ianuarius'' (Opening or Janus's) and ''Februarius'' (Purification, referring to a winter festival). This change is attributed to Numa Pompilius, the legendary second king of Rome.

to:

*** At some point, the Romans decided that this business of having unassigne unassigned time wasn't on for whatever reason. This time was thus divided into two new months at the end of the year, ''Ianuarius'' (Opening or Janus's) and ''Februarius'' (Purification, referring to a winter festival). This change is attributed to Numa Pompilius, the legendary second king of Rome.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* GMT Midnight on January 1, 1970, was chosen as "Second 0" to define the UNIX epoch. It was picked arbitrarily and not expected to be around for long, especially since we are going to run out of digits on January 19, 2038 (at 03:14:07 UTC), using the original method of storing that time (count one per second since the epoch: simple as can be; it's just they didn't anticipate UNIX surviving for over 2.1 billion seconds -- the amount of seconds needed to go through 31 bits). Some newer systems have tried to fix this by doubling the size of the field used to store this information, so that the calendar will still work for eons and eons.

to:

* GMT Midnight GMT on January 1, 1970, was chosen as "Second 0" to define the UNIX epoch. It was picked arbitrarily and not expected to be around for long, especially since we are going to run out of digits on January 19, 2038 (at 03:14:07 UTC), using the original method of storing that time (count one per second since the epoch: simple as can be; it's just they didn't anticipate UNIX surviving for over 2.1 billion seconds -- the amount of seconds needed to go through 31 bits). Some newer systems have tried to fix this by doubling the size of the field used to store this information, so that the calendar will still work for eons and eons.

Changed: 176

Removed: 133

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* The German RPG ''Das schwarze Auge'' (VideoGame/RealmsOfArkania) had the main realm count the years by the current Emperor. By now reckoning has been changed (back) to the 'BF - Fall of Bosparan' reckoning, counting from the fall of the former empire. There are also numerous other calendars around in that world, counting from the first landing of gildenland settlers, the independence of countries, the threat of a catastrophe by a messenger of the gods to a city, and so on.

to:

* The German RPG ''Das schwarze Auge'' (VideoGame/RealmsOfArkania) ''TabletopGame/TheDarkEye'' had the main realm count the years by the current Emperor. By now reckoning has been changed (back) to the 'BF - Fall of Bosparan' reckoning, counting from the fall of the former empire. There are also numerous other calendars around in that world, counting from the first landing of gildenland settlers, the independence of countries, the threat of a catastrophe by a messenger of the gods to a city, and so on.



*** Though it should be noted that B.C.E./C.E. actually were religions to begin with, meaning Before Christian Era and Christian Era.



* Chinese emperors had a tendency to declare a new era every few years, a practice dating back to the Han Dynasty and lasting up to the Ming Dynasty when it was replaced by a system with one era per emperor. This practice was also adopted by the Japanese, where it lasted until the Meiji Restoration.

to:

* Chinese emperors had a tendency to declare a new era every few years, a years for any number of reasons, often to commemorate some sort of auspicious event or achievement. This practice dating back to was introduced in the Han Dynasty and lasting up to the Ming Dynasty when it was replaced by a system with one era per emperor. This practice was also adopted by the Japanese, where it lasted until the Meiji Restoration.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Midnight on January 1, 1970, was chosen as "Second 0" to define the UNIX epoch. It was picked arbitrarily and not expected to be around for long, especially since we are going to run out of digits on January 19, 2038 (at 03:14:07 UTC), using the original method of storing that time (count one per second since the epoch: simple as can be; it's just they didn't anticipate UNIX surviving for over 2.1 billion seconds -- the amount of seconds needed to go through 31 bits). Some newer systems have tried to fix this by doubling the size of the field used to store this information, so that the calendar will still work for eons and eons.

to:

* GMT Midnight on January 1, 1970, was chosen as "Second 0" to define the UNIX epoch. It was picked arbitrarily and not expected to be around for long, especially since we are going to run out of digits on January 19, 2038 (at 03:14:07 UTC), using the original method of storing that time (count one per second since the epoch: simple as can be; it's just they didn't anticipate UNIX surviving for over 2.1 billion seconds -- the amount of seconds needed to go through 31 bits). Some newer systems have tried to fix this by doubling the size of the field used to store this information, so that the calendar will still work for eons and eons.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ''TabletopGame/EclipsePhase'' uses AF (after the Fall), mostly as a way to avert ExtyYearsFromNow. ("The Fall" being when a bunch of crazy [=AIs=] nearly wiped humanity out.)

to:

* ''TabletopGame/EclipsePhase'' uses AF (after the Fall), mostly as a way to avert ExtyYearsFromNow.ExtyYearsFromPublication. ("The Fall" being when a bunch of crazy [=AIs=] nearly wiped humanity out.)
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
I thought that was a fan invention?


* In ''Franchise/AvatarTheLastAirbender'', the calendar reset with the Air Nomad Genocide starting the Hundred Year War. Times before the war are BG (Before [[FinalSolution Genocide]]) and times during and after the war are AG (After Genocide).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* In ''Franchise/AvatarTheLastAirbender'', the calendar reset with the Air Nomad Genocide starting the Hundred Year War. Times before the war are BG (Before [[FinalSolution Genocide]]) and times during and after the war are AG (After Genocide).


Added DiffLines:

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

[[folder:WesternAnimation]]
* In ''WesternAnimation/SamuraiJack'', the calender was reset when [[BigBad Aku]] conquered the world, as shown when a scientist scans Jack with a device that says he's from the year 25 B.A. (Before Aku).
[[/folder]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* ''{{Webcomic/Sarilho}}'': Something drastic happened 508 years before the beginning of the comic events that compelled the Meditans to change their calendars. The Lusitanians don't seem to give it the same importance and continued to count the years as usual, so by the time the story starts they are in the year AD 2805.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Both ''Legends'' and the current ''Franchise/StarWarsExpandedUniverse'' give us a lot of various calendars, which when you're talking about a galaxy-wide civilization across over 35,000 years of history, millions of planets and quadrillions of beings, makes sense. You've got the Tho Yor Arrival calendar, dating from when the first arks brought the pilgrims to Tython that would eventually found the Jedi Knights roughly 35,000 years before the movies, then you've got the Republic Year calendar dating from when the Galactic Republic was founded (roughly 25,000 years before the movies), the Tapani Calendar (started roughly 12,000 years before the films, used in one sector dating to when settlers first arrived there, and using a different length of year localized to the area), the After the Treaty of Coruscant dating to the treaty that set in motion the events of the ''VideoGame/StarWarsTheOldRepublic'' MMO, plus the Great Resynchronization calendar, an in-universe attempt to create a new standard calendar to cut through the variety of calendars in use (it puts Year Zero as 3 years before [[Film/ThePhantomMenace Episode I]]), and the Imperial Year dating to Palpatine's declaration of a New order in [[Film/RevengeOfTheSith Episode III]], and lastly the Before the Battle of Yavin/After the Battle of Yavin calendar dating to the events of Star Wars: A New Hope, which is taking the calendar most widely used by fans and making it an in-universe calendar. It's a lot of systems, but it's a big galaxy with a lot of history.

to:

** Both ''Legends'' and the current ''Franchise/StarWarsExpandedUniverse'' give us a lot of various calendars, which when you're talking about a galaxy-wide civilization across over 35,000 years of history, millions of planets and quadrillions of beings, makes sense. You've got the Tho Yor Arrival calendar, dating from when the first arks brought the pilgrims to Tython that would eventually found the Jedi Knights roughly 35,000 years before the movies, then you've got the Republic Year calendar dating from when the Galactic Republic was founded (roughly 25,000 years before the movies), the Tapani Calendar (started roughly 12,000 years before the films, used in one sector dating to when settlers first arrived there, and using a different length of year localized to the area), the After the Treaty of Coruscant dating to the treaty that set in motion the events of the ''VideoGame/StarWarsTheOldRepublic'' MMO, plus the Great Resynchronization calendar, an in-universe attempt to create a new standard calendar to cut through the variety of calendars in use (it puts Year Zero as 3 years before [[Film/ThePhantomMenace Episode I]]), and the Imperial Year dating to Palpatine's declaration of a New order Order in [[Film/RevengeOfTheSith Episode III]], and lastly the Before the Battle of Yavin/After the Battle of Yavin calendar dating to the events of Star Wars: A New Hope, which is taking the calendar most widely used by fans and making it an in-universe calendar.[[note]]For a while, official out-of-universe timelines had used before and after [[Film/ReturnOfTheJedi Episode VI]] instead as their dating system, though this was never used as an in-universe calendar. Even though it would've been a more logical choice, seeing as that year saw the death of the Emperor and the establishment of the New Republic, significantly more momentous events on a galactic scale than the Battle of Yavin.[[/note]] It's a lot of systems, but it's a big galaxy with a lot of history.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* The main setting's calendar has gone through several iterations, with setting books pointedly avoiding giving specific timeframes for most of them in order to preserve Storyteller's freedom. It was initially measured in years pertaining to the Age of Man, when the Primordials were overthrown and the Solar Deliberative was established. When the Solar Deliberative fell during the Usurpation, the Shogunate fiddled with an alternate calendar. At least until the Great Contagion ruined that as well and the Scarlet Empress ended up unifying various daimyos into the Realm, which is why the calendar currently uses RY (Realm Year) to designate how many years it's been since she took the throne. The end result is a calendar system that basically says, "It has been [[XDaysSince X years since]] the last world-shaking cataclysm."

to:

* ** The main setting's calendar has gone through several iterations, with setting books pointedly avoiding giving specific timeframes for most of them in order to preserve Storyteller's freedom. It was initially measured in years pertaining to the Age of Man, when the Primordials were overthrown and the Solar Deliberative was established. When the Solar Deliberative fell during the Usurpation, the Shogunate fiddled with an alternate calendar. At least until the Great Contagion ruined that as well and the Scarlet Empress ended up unifying various daimyos into the Realm, which is why the calendar currently uses RY (Realm Year) to designate how many years it's been since she took the throne. The end result is a calendar system that basically says, "It has been [[XDaysSince X years since]] the last world-shaking cataclysm."
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ''TabletopGame/{{Exalted}}'' had its timeline initially measured in years pertaining to the Age of Man, when the Primordials were overthrown and the Solar Deliberative was established. When the Solar Deliberative fell during the Usurpation, the Shogunate fiddled with an alternate calendar. At least until the Great Contagion fucked with ''that'' and the Scarlet Empress ended up unifying various daimyos into the Realm, which is why the calendar currently uses RY (Realm Year) to designate how many years it's been since she took the throne.
** The calendar system basically says, "It has been [[XDaysSince X years since]] the last world-shaking cataclysm."
*** It says something when the calendar used by Autochthonia (which started somewhere in the days of the Solar Deliberative and hasn't been reset since) has a current date that's ''several thousand years'' farther along than the one currently used in Creation.

to:

* ''TabletopGame/{{Exalted}}'' had its timeline ''TabletopGame/{{Exalted}}'':
* The main setting's calendar has gone through several iterations, with setting books pointedly avoiding giving specific timeframes for most of them in order to preserve Storyteller's freedom. It was
initially measured in years pertaining to the Age of Man, when the Primordials were overthrown and the Solar Deliberative was established. When the Solar Deliberative fell during the Usurpation, the Shogunate fiddled with an alternate calendar. At least until the Great Contagion fucked with ''that'' ruined that as well and the Scarlet Empress ended up unifying various daimyos into the Realm, which is why the calendar currently uses RY (Realm Year) to designate how many years it's been since she took the throne.
**
throne. The end result is a calendar system that basically says, "It has been [[XDaysSince X years since]] the last world-shaking cataclysm."
*** It says something when ** Autochtonia, being essentially a PlanetSpaceship that left the calendar used by Autochthonia (which started somewhere in the days of world sometime during the Solar Deliberative and hasn't been reset since) Deliberative, has its own calendar. It doesn't provide a current date that's ''several thousand years'' farther along specific reference for any calendar matchups with the main setting, but they have several thousands of years of uninterrupted timekeeping more than the one currently used in Creation.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Played straight in the Dark Imperium era. After the Primarch returned and took over the Imperium, he found out that not only had recent events caused a serious TimeyWimeyBall effect on the last few centuries, ten thousand years of flawed record keeping and deliberate redactions meant that current date even on Terra itself had a margin of error of ''a thousand years'' in either direction. He ended up just giving up and declaring that the new calendar would start from when the new Warp Storm visible in the sky of every world first appeared there and count in local years. It's less precise and requires constant conversions, but it's a hell of a lot more accurate.

to:

** Played straight in the Dark Imperium era. After the Primarch returned and took over the Imperium, he found out that not only had recent events caused a serious TimeyWimeyBall effect on the last few centuries, ten thousand years of flawed record keeping and deliberate redactions meant that current date even on Terra itself had a margin of error of ''a thousand years'' in either direction. He ended up just giving up and declaring that the new calendar would start from when the new Warp Storm visible in the sky of every world first appeared there and count in local years. It's less precise and requires constant conversions, but it's a hell of a lot more accurate. For out of universe convenience, this method started on 000.M42, essentially making it so that each planet is able to give how long they spent subjectively in-between contacts with the nearest Imperial Astropathic office, who then inform the planet of what year it actually is.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* In general, this is the case. It took a long time for people to discover that a "year" took approximately 365 days. Eventually it was discovered to be closer to 365.25. This means that every 4th year of the calendar will contain a leap day added to February to make up the difference and thus the year will be called a leap year. In modern times, it was narrowed down to 365.2425. This means that every 100th year, that year will not be a leap year and not contain a leap day, except every 400th year WILL be a leap year. This works almost perfectly except for the fact that the length of a year has slowly been changing for all of Earth's history (as does the length of a day thanks to the moon slowing down the Earth's rotation). For the purposes of the modern Gregorian calendar, with the invention of atomic clocks and exact measuring systems, we can make changes to the calendar without causing the aforementioned Shakespean paradox where two people can die on the "same day" despite having died actual days apart from each other. This also makes it simpler for lay people as they don't need complex math to figure out the year while the scientists who use complex math anyways can figure it out for us. Even as science, religion, and politics became more and more separated, the Gregorian calendar has stayed more or less intact because it would be too confusing and controversial to switch over to something new (which is also one of the reasons why other cultures refuse to give up their own calendars and also to thumb their noses at the church as Isaac Asimov claimed).

to:

* In general, this is the case. It took a long time for people to discover that a "year" took approximately 365 days. Eventually it was discovered to be closer to 365.25. This means that every 4th year of the calendar will contain a leap day added to February to make up the difference and thus the year will be called a leap year. In modern times, it was narrowed down to 365.2425. This means that every 100th year, that year will not be a leap year and not contain a leap day, except every 400th year WILL be a leap year. This works almost perfectly except for the fact that the length of a year has slowly been changing for all of Earth's history (as does the length of a day thanks to the moon slowing down the Earth's rotation). For the purposes of the modern Gregorian calendar, with the invention of atomic clocks and exact measuring systems, we can make changes to the calendar without causing the aforementioned Shakespean Shakesperean paradox where two people can die on the "same day" despite having died actual days apart from each other. This also makes it simpler for lay people as they don't need complex math to figure out the year while the scientists who use complex math anyways can figure it out for us. Even as science, religion, and politics became more and more separated, the Gregorian calendar has stayed more or less intact because it would be too confusing and controversial to switch over to something new (which is also one of the reasons why other cultures refuse to give up their own calendars and also to thumb their noses at the church as Isaac Asimov claimed).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* The Franchise/{{Gundam}} franchise loves using alternate calendar systems, but the only one that really matches this trope is ''[[Anime/AfterWarGundamX Gundam X]]'', which is set in '''A'''fter '''W'''ar 0015, 15 years after the [[ApocalypseHow disastrous end of the 7th Space War]] which wiped out 99% of humanity living on Earth. Some fan theories suggest that ''[[Anime/MobileSuitGundamWing Gundam Wing]]''[='s=] '''A'''fter '''C'''olony calendar started with the launch of Skylab, but there isn't any official proof that this is true or not. Special mention to ''Anime/TurnAGundam'', which implicitly has several dozen calendar changes in its backstory, to the point where this trope is the only explanation.

to:

* The Franchise/{{Gundam}} franchise loves using alternate calendar systems, but the only one that really matches this trope is ''[[Anime/AfterWarGundamX Gundam X]]'', which is set in '''A'''fter '''W'''ar 0015, 15 years after the [[ApocalypseHow disastrous end of the 7th Space War]] which wiped out 99% of humanity living on Earth. Some fan theories suggest that ''[[Anime/MobileSuitGundamWing Gundam Wing]]''[='s=] '''A'''fter '''C'''olony calendar started with the launch of Skylab, but there isn't any official proof that this is true or not. Special mention to ''Anime/TurnAGundam'', which implicitly has several dozen calendar changes in its backstory, to the point where this trope is the only explanation. [[spoiler: Every single timeline will eventually have a version of the Turn A, which inexplicably causes a timeline reset into a new alternate universe through massive destruction.]]



* One of the proofs that the Holy Britannian Empire is ''the'' most dominant force on Earth in Anime/CodeGeass universe, the calendar doesn't follow the real world AD/CE - instead, we have A.T.B, for "Ascension to Throne, Britannia", counting from the establishment of the first Celtic King in the Britannian royal line, rather than the birth of Christ. Closer to this trope is the Revolutionary Calendar used by the EU, a variant of the French Republican Calendar that sets its first year to 1790, the year after the French Revolution.

to:

* One of the proofs that the Holy Britannian Empire is ''the'' most dominant force on Earth in Anime/CodeGeass universe, the calendar doesn't follow the real world AD/CE - instead, we have A.T.B, for "Ascension to Throne, Britannia", counting from the establishment of the first Celtic King in the Britannian royal line, rather than the birth of Christ. (For those wondering, 1 A.T.B. - 50 B.C., which means the series is set in an alternate 1967/68.) Closer to this trope is the Revolutionary Calendar used by the EU, a variant of the French Republican Calendar that sets its first year to 1790, the year after the French Revolution.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* ''Literature/{{Seveneves}}'' uses dates starting from the moment the "Agent" blew up the Moon. The story begins TwentyMinutesIntoTheFuture (the [=ISS=] still exists but has a small centrifugal section and an attached asteroid) but no real-world year is ever stated.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Speaking of the Universal Century, ''Anime/MobileSuitGundamUnicorn'' reveals that the calendar change occurred on the eve of the United Nations' reformation into the [[TheFederation Earth Federation]], which was supposed to be peaceful... were it not for a GovernmentConspiracy blowing up the Laplace space station where the first Prime Minister of the Federation was holding his inauguration speech, an event whose aftershocks shaped world history for the next hundred years.

to:

** Speaking of the Universal Century, ''Anime/MobileSuitGundamUnicorn'' reveals that the calendar change occurred on the eve of the United Nations' UsefulNotes/UnitedNations' reformation into the [[TheFederation Earth Federation]], which was supposed to be peaceful... were it not for a GovernmentConspiracy blowing up the Laplace space station where the first Prime Minister of the Federation was holding his inauguration speech, an event whose aftershocks shaped world history for the next hundred years.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* ''VideoGame/ProjectWingman'' takes place in 432 AC, or "After Calamity," an event that involved many volcanic eruptions and earthquakes in the Pacific Ring of Fire, the eruption of the Yellowstone Supervolcano, large areas of land being submerged, and new islands forming.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** The last big change to Roman time was the Julian reform. The Roman calendar before UsefulNotes/JuliusCaesar was a lunisolar one where each month roughly corresponded to one cycle of phases of the Moon. The advantage of the weird original Roman calendar with about 2 months' worth of time not actually part of any month was that it always aligned with the solar year; after December ended, the Romans of those days waited for the next vernal equinox to start the next year's ''Martius''. The addition of ''Ianuarius'' and ''Februarius'' created a headache in that now that a year was supposed to be 12 months, it would start falling behind the actual seasons, and fairly quickly at that (12 lunar cycles comes to about 354 days, 11 days less than a solar year). As a result, the Romans added an extra "intercalary" month would be added to make the year line up with the seasons when the Pontifex Maximus (the chief priest of the Roman state) determined it was needed every 2-3 years.\\

to:

** The last big change to Roman time was the Julian reform. The Roman calendar before UsefulNotes/JuliusCaesar was a lunisolar one where each month roughly corresponded to one cycle of phases of the Moon. The advantage of the weird original Roman calendar with about 2 months' worth of time not actually part of any month was that it always aligned with the solar year; after December ended, the Romans of those days waited for the next vernal equinox to start the next year's ''Martius''. The addition of ''Ianuarius'' and ''Februarius'' created a headache in that now that a year was supposed to be 12 months, it would start falling behind the actual seasons, and fairly quickly at that (12 lunar cycles comes to about 354 days, 11 days less than a solar year).year[[note]]For those playing along at home, this meant it only took three years for the calendar to go a whole month out of sync with the seasons, and nine years for the months to seasons not to line up at all.[[/note]]). As a result, the Romans added an extra "intercalary" month would be added to make the year line up with the seasons when the Pontifex Maximus (the chief priest of the Roman state) determined it was needed every 2-3 years.\\
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** The Romans did not usually use a continuous numbering system for their years, the way we do. Unique years were identified with reference to the political leadership of the state. Under the monarchy, this meant regnal years (the Xth year of King Y's reign). Under the Republic, they referred to the years as "[the year] ''X'' and ''Y'' being consul," which, naturally, [[ExactlyWhatItSaysOnTheTin was the year when the two individuals in question were consul]]. (During UsefulNotes/JuliusCaesar's first consulate in 59 BCE, his co-consul Bibulus was so unpopular and so thoroughly stymied in his first attempt to seriously exercise consular power early in the year[[note]]Within a month of their taking office, Caesar had called a vote of the Plebeian Assembly on his signature piece of legislation, a land reform bill. Bibulus showed up to the assembly to veto the vote, but the crowd attacked him and dumped feces on his head, at which point Bibulus and his conservative supporters (including Cato) departed. Bibulus claimed that he was vetoing the proceedings the entire time, but Caesar claimed that even if Bibulus had been doing that, neither he nor anyone else could hear him over the roar of the crowd. Bibulus was unpopular enough (and Caesar popular enough) that we really can't tell what actually happened.[[/note]] that he retreated to his house for the rest of his term; this left the field solely to Caesar, and people jokingly started to call 59 BCE "the year of Julius and Caesar being consul.") The consular-year naming continued after Augustus overthrew the Republic and established the Principate form of the Empire (in which the Republic nominally still ran like it used to and the Emperor was JustTheFirstCitizen). However, after the Crisis of the Third Century, Diocletian's Dominate (basically the Empire saying, "why yes the Emperor is a king"), regnal years came back into use. When the Romans had to use a continuously-numbered calendar (e.g. in histories), they counted years from the foundation of the city of Rome -- ''AbUrbeCondita'' or A.V.C.

to:

** The Romans did not usually use a continuous numbering system for their years, the way we do. Unique years were identified with reference to the political leadership of the state. Under the monarchy, this meant regnal years (the Xth year of King Y's reign). Under the Republic, they referred to the years as "[the year] ''X'' and ''Y'' being consul," which, naturally, [[ExactlyWhatItSaysOnTheTin was the year when the two individuals in question were consul]]. (During UsefulNotes/JuliusCaesar's first consulate in 59 BCE, his co-consul Bibulus was so unpopular and so thoroughly stymied in his first attempt to seriously exercise consular power early in the year[[note]]Within a month of their taking office, Caesar had called a vote of the Plebeian Assembly on his signature piece of legislation, a land reform bill. Bibulus showed up to the assembly to veto the vote, but the crowd attacked him and dumped feces on his head, at which point Bibulus and his conservative supporters (including Cato) departed. Bibulus claimed that he was vetoing the proceedings the entire time, but Caesar claimed that even if Bibulus had been doing that, neither he nor anyone else could hear him over the roar of the crowd. Bibulus was unpopular enough (and Caesar popular enough) that we really can't tell what actually happened.[[/note]] It also raised a question of Roman law which the Romans never got around to answering--is a consul's veto effective when the consul issues it or when it is received and understood by the official whose actions are being vetoed?[[/note]] that he retreated to his house for the rest of his term; this left the field solely to Caesar, and people jokingly started to call 59 BCE "the year of Julius and Caesar being consul.") The consular-year naming continued after Augustus overthrew the Republic and established the Principate form of the Empire (in which the Republic nominally still ran like it used to and the Emperor was JustTheFirstCitizen). However, after the Crisis of the Third Century, Diocletian's Dominate (basically the Empire saying, "why yes the Emperor is a king"), regnal years came back into use. When the Romans had to use a continuously-numbered calendar (e.g. in histories), they counted years from the foundation of the city of Rome -- ''AbUrbeCondita'' or A.V.C.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Caesar found what he was looking for in Egypt. While chasing Pompey around the Eastern Mediterranean, he encountered the Ancient Egyptian calendar, which ignored the Moon completely and simply made every month 30 days long, with an additional 5 days belonging to no month as a kind of festival time at the end of the year. Caesar liked this system, although he had two problems with it: it still meant the dates would get out of line with the seasons, albeit at a much slower rate,[[note]]The Egyptians knew this, but didn't care as much because of some religious stuff they had about the first rising of Sirius, plus the problem fixed itself every 1,460 years, which the Egyptians were OK with it seems.[[/note]] and the concept of days with no month annoyed him for some reason. To address the first problem, he added a sixth additional day to the year every fourth year (which one of the Ptolemaic Greek Kings of Egypt had tried to do about 200 years earlier, but the Egyptians had resisted for the aforementioned religious reasons, and probably also as a way of thumbing their noses at the Greeks). To address the second problem, the six days were distributed among the months of the year. To commemorate these changes, Caesar then renamed ''Quintilis'', the month in which he had been born, ''Iulius'' after himself. Augustus would then rename the following month ''Augustus'' after himself to commemorate the [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Actium Battle of Actium]].

to:

Caesar found what he was looking for in Egypt. While chasing Pompey around the Eastern Mediterranean, he encountered the Ancient Egyptian calendar, which ignored the Moon completely and simply made every month 30 days long, with an additional 5 days belonging to no month as a kind of festival time at the end of the year. Caesar liked this system, although he had two problems with it: it still meant the dates would get out of line with the seasons, albeit at a much slower rate,[[note]]The Egyptians knew this, but didn't care as much because of some religious stuff they had about the first rising of Sirius, plus the problem fixed itself every 1,460 years, which the Egyptians were OK with it seems.[[/note]] and the concept of days with no month annoyed him for some reason. To address the first problem, he added a sixth additional day to the year every fourth year (which year.[[note]]Which one of the Ptolemaic Greek Kings of Egypt had tried to do about 200 years earlier, but the Egyptians had resisted for the aforementioned religious reasons, and probably also as a way of thumbing their noses at the Greeks). Greeks.[[/note]] To address the second problem, the six days were distributed among the months of the year. To commemorate these changes, Caesar then renamed ''Quintilis'', the month in which he had been born, ''Iulius'' after himself. Augustus would then rename the following month ''Augustus'' after himself to commemorate the [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Actium Battle of Actium]].

Top