Follow TV Tropes

Following

History Main / ChewbaccaDefense

Go To

OR

Added: 334

Changed: 708

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** For the record, Chewbacca ''doesn't'' live on Endor, he lives on Kashyyyk.[[labelnote:If you want to get technical]]He actually doesn't even live on Kashyyyk, he was ''born'' on Kashyyyk, but spends the majority of his time (and pretty much all of his screen time) travelling with Han Solo aboard the ''Millenium Falcon.''[[/labelnote]] In fact, nobody lives on Endor, because it's a gas giant. Ewoks live on one of Endor's moons. Therefore, Cochran's entire argument, in addition to being nonsense, is also completely ''wrong''. [[FridgeBrilliance Which may or may not have been the whole point]] since Chef was clearly the victim of a FrivolousLawsuit and deserved to win. If Chewbacca lives on Endor, you must acquit, and he doesn't, so the jury shouldn't have acquitted and should have sided with Chef instead.

to:

** For the record, Chewbacca ''doesn't'' live on Endor, he lives on Kashyyyk.[[labelnote:If you want to get technical]]He actually doesn't even live on Kashyyyk, he was ''born'' on Kashyyyk, Endor. He's from Kashyyyk as Cochran mentions, but spends the majority of his time (and pretty much all of his screen time) travelling with Han Solo aboard the ''Millenium Falcon.''[[/labelnote]] '' In fact, nobody lives on Endor, because it's a gas giant. Ewoks live on giant; the "forest moon of Endor" is so called because it's one of Endor's moons. Therefore, Cochran's entire argument, in addition to being nonsense, is also completely ''wrong''. ''wrong'' -- if there's ''any'' logic to it at all, it's one of OffscreenInertia based on the fact that the original trilogy ends with the main cast celebrating on the forest moon, leaving one with the assumption that they live there now, a conclusion that very few ''Star Wars'' viewers have ever actually come to.
** The flat-out wrong ''Star Wars'' lore surrounding it
[[FridgeBrilliance Which may or may not have been the whole point]] since Chef was clearly the victim of a FrivolousLawsuit and deserved to win. If Chewbacca lives on Endor, you must acquit, and he doesn't, so the jury shouldn't have acquitted and should have sided with Chef instead.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
The Bount Defense

Added DiffLines:

* During Music/YoungThug's racketeering trial, a defense attorney for one of the rapper's co-conspirators said in her opening statement that the trial reminded her of [[Recap/BleachBountArc the Bount arc]] from ''{{Manga/Bleach}}''. Her rationale was that her client is like a character in a {{Filler}} arc, who exists solely to take up pages in the court filings, thereby making the charges against the ringleader seem more substantial. She then declared the trial a circus, [[RightForTheWrongReasons arguably the most salient part of the entire statement]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Yet another Atheist's logical counterargument.

to:

Yet another Atheist's logical counterargument.\\
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Atheists gives up and goes home.\\
Therefore God exists.

to:

Atheists Atheist gives up and goes home.\\
Therefore God exists.\\
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

[[folder:Jokes]]
* A Catholic Christian and an Atheist have an argument:
-->'''Christian:''' ''God exists.''\\
Atheist's logical counterargument.\\
'''Christian:''' ''God exists.''\\
Atheist's another logical counterargument.\\
'''Christian:''' ''God exists.''\\
Yet another Atheist's logical counterargument.
'''Christian:''' ''GOD EXISTS!!''\\
Atheists gives up and goes home.\\
Therefore God exists.
[[/folder]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* In ''Film/TheCocoanuts'', when Mr. Hammer is confronted by his hotel staff demanding their wages, Hammer argues that they're "wage-slaves" for expecting to be paid for the work they do -- and that they should be "free" to work for free instead. Amazingly, his argument ''works.''
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
index wick


** Cato the Elder is famous, among other things, for ending his senate speeches with "[[CatchPhrase Carthago delenda est,]]" which translates to "Carthage must be destroyed." He did this in ''every single'' speech he gave, regardless of whether it had anything to do with Carthage. He believed that strongly that it had to go. But he also invoked Carthage as an AppealToWorseProblems; whatever the senate was debating was likely not as critical to the existence of the Roman state than the UsefulNotes/PunicWars. Cato continued the practice until the day he died, shortly before Carthage was razed to the ground, as he had wanted for years.

to:

** Cato the Elder is famous, among other things, for ending his senate speeches with "[[CatchPhrase Carthago "Carthago delenda est,]]" est," which translates to "Carthage must be destroyed." He did this in ''every single'' speech he gave, regardless of whether it had anything to do with Carthage. He believed that strongly that it had to go. But he also invoked Carthage as an AppealToWorseProblems; whatever the senate was debating was likely not as critical to the existence of the Roman state than the UsefulNotes/PunicWars. Cato continued the practice until the day he died, shortly before Carthage was razed to the ground, as he had wanted for years.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** "The Trial of R. Kelly" features Music/RKelly on trial for urinating on a minor. Despite the overwhelming evidence against him, he wins the case due to his popularity and because his lawyer used manipulative LogicalFallacies such as comparing R. Kelly's perversions to the Founding Fathers', in an inversion of HitlerAteSugar, and accuses the staggering evidence of being "really" based on racism. The defense lawyer also makes an issue out of the fact that the DA in the case, Tom Dubois, has a white wife (Sarah). [[AuthorAvatar Huey Freeman]] calls the entire court out on their stupidity afterwards:

to:

** "The "[[Recap/TheBoondocksS1E2TheTrialOfRKelly The Trial of R. Kelly" Kelly]]" features Music/RKelly on trial for urinating on a minor. Despite the overwhelming evidence against him, he wins the case due to his popularity and because his lawyer used manipulative LogicalFallacies such as comparing R. Kelly's perversions to the Founding Fathers', in an inversion of HitlerAteSugar, and accuses the staggering evidence of being "really" based on racism. The defense lawyer also makes an issue out of the fact that the DA in the case, Tom Dubois, has a white wife (Sarah). [[AuthorAvatar Huey Freeman]] calls the entire court out on their stupidity afterwards:



** In "Return of the King", Huey and Martin Luther King, Jr. are on a Creator/{{Fox News|Channel}}-type show, and the host responds to King by saying "Do you love America?", implying that King is simply anti-American. What's worse is that the way he asked it seemed to imply that it's a standard question that he asks everybody in the hopes of sparking conflict. And what's even worse is that a political pundit (Sean Hannity) has said these very words verbatim multiple times. It also didn't help that the height of this line's popularity was during the lead-up to the Iraq War. Though he doesn't really get anywhere with this dialogue, because he promptly gets assaulted with a projectile folding chair and beaten up by a child.

to:

** In "Return "[[Recap/TheBoondocksS1E9ReturnOfTheKing Return of the King", King]]", Huey and Martin Luther King, Jr. are on a Creator/{{Fox News|Channel}}-type Fox News-type show, and the host responds to King by saying "Do you love America?", implying that King is simply anti-American. What's worse is that the way he asked it seemed to imply that it's a standard question that he asks everybody in the hopes of sparking conflict. And what's even worse is that a political pundit (Sean Hannity) has said these very words verbatim multiple times. It also didn't help that the height of this line's popularity was during the lead-up to the Iraq War. Though he doesn't really get anywhere with this dialogue, because he promptly gets assaulted with a projectile folding chair and beaten up by a child.



* In the ''WesternAnimation/FamilyGuy'' episode "It Takes a Village Idiot, and I Married One", Mayor West uses this when Lois is running against him. Lois then wins the election by taking Brian's advice to do the same thing:[[note]]She answers every question with "9/11".[[/note]]

to:

* In the ''WesternAnimation/FamilyGuy'' episode "It "[[Recap/FamilyGuyS5E17ItTakesAVillageIdiotAndIMarriedOne It Takes a Village Idiot, Idiot and I Married One", One]]", Mayor West uses this when Lois is running against him. Lois then wins the election by taking Brian's advice to do the same thing:[[note]]She answers every question with "9/11".[[/note]]



** In the episode "In Blackest Night: Part II", Franchise/TheFlash becomes the Franchise/GreenLantern's attorney during his trial. The former doesn't have a clue what to use to turn the case around, so he uses a Chewbacca defense. He ends his speech with "If the ring wasn't lit, you must acquit!" Both of them end up getting sentenced to death. The use of the defense is {{justified|Trope}} in this case, since Flash wasn't really trying to win, just slow the trial down so that Superman and Martian Manhunter would have enough time to find proof that GL was innocent, which they did.
** In "Eclipsed: Part I", talk show host Glorious Godfrey accuses the League of causing more crimes than they solve. Proof? White collar crime, which the League doesn't cover, [[LiesDamnedLiesAndStatistics went up 3%]]. The real kicker is when he claims that thanks to the League, half of marriages end in divorce, while the other half in ''death''.

to:

** In the episode "In "[[Recap/JusticeLeagueS1E4And5InBlackestNight In Blackest Night: Part II", Franchise/TheFlash II]]", the Flash becomes the Franchise/GreenLantern's Green Lantern's attorney during his trial. The former doesn't have a clue what to use to turn the case around, so he uses a Chewbacca defense. He ends his speech with "If the ring wasn't lit, you must acquit!" Both of them end up getting sentenced to death. The use of the defense is {{justified|Trope}} in this case, since Flash wasn't really trying to win, just slow the trial down so that Superman and Martian Manhunter would have enough time to find proof that GL was innocent, which they did.
** In "Eclipsed: "[[Recap/JusticeLeagueS2E13And14Eclipsed Eclipsed: Part I", I]]", talk show host Glorious Godfrey accuses the League of causing more crimes than they solve. Proof? White collar crime, which the League doesn't cover, [[LiesDamnedLiesAndStatistics went up 3%]]. The real kicker is when he claims that thanks to the League, half of marriages end in divorce, while the other half in ''death''.



** When Marge is being prosecuted for shoplifting in "Marge in Chains":

to:

** When Marge is being prosecuted for shoplifting in "Marge "[[Recap/TheSimpsonsS4E21MargeInChains Marge in Chains":Chains]]":



** During Homer's dispute with the phone company in "A Tale of Two Springfields":

to:

** During Homer's dispute with the phone company in "A "[[Recap/TheSimpsonsS12E2ATaleOfTwoSpringfields A Tale of Two Springfields":Springfields]]":



** In "To Surveil With Love", Lisa joins the school's debate team. In her first debate, her opponent, a brunette girl, immediately circumvents the subject in favor of breaking down Lisa's argument on the grounds that Lisa is a DumbBlonde. Much to the chagrin of anyone with half a brain, [[InsaneTrollLogic it works]].
* The {{Trope Namer|s}} comes from the ''WesternAnimation/SouthPark'' episode "Chef Aid". The defense is employed by Johnnie Cochran. An oft-overlooked aspect of the defense is that Cochran ''himself'' points out that the argument that he's making is utter nonsense, and is just using this as yet more evidence that the whole trial is a joke and the jury should acquit.

to:

** In "To "[[Recap/TheSimpsonsS21E20ToSurveilWithLove To Surveil With Love", with Love]]", Lisa joins the school's debate team. In her first debate, her opponent, a brunette girl, immediately circumvents the subject in favor of breaking down Lisa's argument on the grounds that Lisa is a DumbBlonde. Much to the chagrin of anyone with half a brain, [[InsaneTrollLogic it works]].
* The {{Trope Namer|s}} comes from the ''WesternAnimation/SouthPark'' episode "Chef Aid"."[[Recap/SouthParkS2E14ChefAid Chef Aid]]". The defense is employed by Johnnie Cochran. An oft-overlooked aspect of the defense is that Cochran ''himself'' points out that the argument that he's making is utter nonsense, and is just using this as yet more evidence that the whole trial is a joke and the jury should acquit.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Replacing YouTube link


** Senator Mike Lee (R-UT) did this in his attack on the "Green New Deal", saying he would treat it with "the seriousness it deserves". This led to [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6fLd0duzT6g a speech]] which included pictures of [[WesternAnimation/{{Superfriends}} Aquaman riding a seahorse]], UsefulNotes/RonaldReagan riding a velociraptor shooting a gun, and [[Film/TheEmpireStrikesBack Luke Skywalker riding a tauntaun]]. It's perhaps the purest form of Chewbacca defense in that it emphasizes a belief that the entire debate is nonsensical.

to:

** Senator Mike Lee (R-UT) did this in his attack on the "Green New Deal", saying he would treat it with "the seriousness it deserves". This led to [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6fLd0duzT6g com/watch?v=sK27NZon11w a speech]] which included pictures of [[WesternAnimation/{{Superfriends}} Aquaman riding a seahorse]], UsefulNotes/RonaldReagan riding a velociraptor shooting a gun, and [[Film/TheEmpireStrikesBack Luke Skywalker riding a tauntaun]]. It's perhaps the purest form of Chewbacca defense in that it emphasizes a belief that the entire debate is nonsensical.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* In ''WebVideo/TheTrialOfTimHeidecker'' (a spinoff of ''WebVideo/OnCinema''), Tim is on trial for twenty counts of FelonyMurder from passing out toxic vape pens at his illegally organized music festival. His defense includes claims such as:
** One of the twenty victims actually died of a heroin overdose, so who's to say the other nineteen didn't die that way as well?
** The San Bernardino police never investigated the shady company in Shanghai Tim sourced his chemicals from, which means it's the company's fault and the police are covering it up for reasons of PoliticalOvercorrectness. He refers to this so-called "China connection" multiple times throughout the trial.
** Disproving prosecution witness Gregg Turkington's skills as a movie buff by proving he confuses the plots of ''Star Trek II'' and ''IV'' is enough to invalidate the entirety of his testimony.
** Just because the prosecution has Tim's evidence dismissed for being obviously forged doesn't mean the jury can't rely on it anyway.
* Tim is just an innocent man at the scene of the crime, just like the victims, so why aren't the victims on trial too?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** The [[http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Gish_Gallop "Gish Gallop"]] is commonly encountered in the atheist and agnostic community, after debates with creationist, biochemist, and professional debater [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duane_Gish#Debates Duane Gish]]. Gish employed a technique similar to "spreading" -- introduce as many arguments as you can, and if your opponent can't address every single one of them fast enough, you win. Except Gish didn't even bother making ''valid'' arguments; he just used the same canards over and over again, easy to deploy but difficult to clean up quickly. The best defense against the Gish Gallop was employed by Michael Shermer, who knew what he was getting into and was able to accurately ''predict'' all of Gish's arguments before he even made them and explain why they were wrong -- he even predicted (and stole) all of Gish's jokes. (Gish just gave the same speech he always gave and declared himself the winner.)

to:

** The [[http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Gish_Gallop "Gish Gallop"]] is commonly encountered in the atheist and agnostic community, after debates with creationist, biochemist, and professional debater [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duane_Gish#Debates Duane Gish]]. Gish employed a technique similar to "spreading" -- introduce as many arguments as you can, and if your opponent can't address every single one of them fast enough, you win. Except Gish didn't even bother making ''valid'' arguments; he just used the same canards over and over again, easy to deploy but difficult to clean up quickly. The best defense against the Gish Gallop was employed by both Michael Shermer, who Shermer and Series/{{Bill Nye|TheScienceGuy}} in their debates against Gish and Ken Ham, respectively. Shermer and Nye knew what he was they were getting into and was were able to accurately ''predict'' all of Gish's Gish and Ham's arguments before he they even made them and explain why they were wrong -- he Shermer even predicted (and stole) all of Gish's jokes. (Gish just gave the same speech he always gave and declared himself the winner.)
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ''Film/TheGoodsLiveHardSellHard'': Don "The Goods" [[EstablishingCharacterMoment quickly establishes]] what [[HonestJohnsDealership kind of a salesman he is]] and how good he is at it by swindling a stewardess into letting him smoke on an airplane with a spiel about how when smoking was allowed on airplanes [[{{Eagleland}} America]] put [[UsefulNotes/TheSpaceRace a man on the Moon]] and thus Americans should be given back that freedom and improve the country (he even gets "The Battle Hymn of the Republic" as background music as he says it).

to:

* ''Film/TheGoodsLiveHardSellHard'': Don "The Goods" Ready [[EstablishingCharacterMoment quickly establishes]] what [[HonestJohnsDealership kind of a salesman he is]] and how good he is at it by swindling a stewardess into letting him smoke on an airplane with a spiel about how when smoking was allowed on airplanes [[{{Eagleland}} America]] put [[UsefulNotes/TheSpaceRace a man on the Moon]] and thus Americans should be given back that freedom and improve the country (he even gets "The Battle Hymn of the Republic" as background music as he says it).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* ''Film/TheGoodsLiveHardSellHard'': Don "The Goods" [[EstablishingCharacterMoment quickly establishes]] what [[HonestJohnsDealership kind of a salesman he is]] and how good he is at it by swindling a stewardess into letting him smoke on an airplane with a spiel about how when smoking was allowed on airplanes [[{{Eagleland}} America]] put [[UsefulNotes/TheSpaceRace a man on the Moon]] and thus Americans should be given back that freedom and improve the country (he even gets "The Battle Hymn of the Republic" as background music as he says it).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


-->-- ''LightNovel/{{Baccano}}''

to:

-->-- ''LightNovel/{{Baccano}}''
''Literature/{{Baccano}}''



* Isaac and Miria from ''LightNovel/{{Baccano}}''. The argument referenced in the quote? ''It wasn't even an argument at all'', but rather a ShrinkingViolet trying to introduce himself to them.
* An utterly horrifying example in ''LightNovel/{{Durarara}}''. After inviting two women to kill themselves with him, Izaya asks them if they think there is anything after death. After saying they do, Izaya proceeds to mock them, and tells them that killing themselves yet still believing in the afterlife is stupid since they're just trying to escape their problems. It's stated that his arguments are flawed and that there are many loopholes to exploit. The reason the women do not challenge him is that they believe Izaya is too twisted to reason with and nothing they said would get through to him.

to:

* Isaac and Miria from ''LightNovel/{{Baccano}}''.''Literature/{{Baccano}}''. The argument referenced in the quote? ''It wasn't even an argument at all'', but rather a ShrinkingViolet trying to introduce himself to them.
* An utterly horrifying example in ''LightNovel/{{Durarara}}''.''Literature/{{Durarara}}''. After inviting two women to kill themselves with him, Izaya asks them if they think there is anything after death. After saying they do, Izaya proceeds to mock them, and tells them that killing themselves yet still believing in the afterlife is stupid since they're just trying to escape their problems. It's stated that his arguments are flawed and that there are many loopholes to exploit. The reason the women do not challenge him is that they believe Izaya is too twisted to reason with and nothing they said would get through to him.



* Used in ''LightNovel/HorizonInTheMiddleOfNowhere'' by Pope Innocentius when he's debating against Masazumi. Masazumi has just accused the Testament Union of abusing the system of History Recreation to benefit themselves at the cost of an innocent person's life. She then proposes an alternative course of action that requires no deaths and benefits not just the far east but ultimately the whole world. The Pope's response? He reveals to everyone listening that Masazumi (who presents herself as male) is actually a girl and then accuses her of just using the situation to take power for herself. It was totally irrelevant, did nothing to counter her arguments, and it almost worked.

to:

* Used in ''LightNovel/HorizonInTheMiddleOfNowhere'' ''Literature/HorizonInTheMiddleOfNowhere'' by Pope Innocentius when he's debating against Masazumi. Masazumi has just accused the Testament Union of abusing the system of History Recreation to benefit themselves at the cost of an innocent person's life. She then proposes an alternative course of action that requires no deaths and benefits not just the far east but ultimately the whole world. The Pope's response? He reveals to everyone listening that Masazumi (who presents herself as male) is actually a girl and then accuses her of just using the situation to take power for herself. It was totally irrelevant, did nothing to counter her arguments, and it almost worked.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Keyrock the Unfrozen Caveman Lawyer from ''Series/SaturdayNightLive'' abused this constantly. Every sketch would have him beginning his statements with lengthy monologues about how he's "just a caveman", frightened and confused in a modern world he doesn't comprehend, to establish himself as a complete outsider to humankind -- and then rattling off his argument and desired verdict as if it's a universal truth even ''he'' can understand. Despite being an obvious slimeball attorney who's adapted ''[[LikeADuckTakesToWater extremely well]]'' to the 20th century, he always wins his case.

to:

* Keyrock the Unfrozen Caveman Lawyer from ''Series/SaturdayNightLive'' abused this constantly. Every sketch would have him beginning his statements with lengthy monologues about how he's "just a caveman", frightened and confused in a modern world he doesn't comprehend, to establish himself as a complete outsider to humankind -- and then rattling off his argument and desired verdict as if it's a universal truth even ''he'' can understand. Despite being an obvious slimeball {{slimeball}} attorney who's adapted ''[[LikeADuckTakesToWater extremely well]]'' to the 20th century, he always wins his case.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
not the source of the term


* The [[http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Gish_Gallop "Gish Gallop"]] (as it's known on Rational Wiki, named after [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duane_Gish#Debates Duane Gish]]): Hit your opponent with as many arguments as you can in as short a timespan as you can. If they don't address ''every single one'' to your satisfaction, you win. And it's practically impossible for them to do that because they have no time to prepare and are not going to pay attention to everything you're vomiting out there.

to:

* The [[http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Gish_Gallop "Gish Gallop"]] (as it's known on Rational Wiki, named after [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duane_Gish#Debates Duane Gish]]): org/wiki/Gish_gallop "Gish Gallop"]]: Hit your opponent with as many arguments as you can in as short a timespan as you can. If they don't address ''every single one'' to your satisfaction, you win. And it's practically impossible for them to do that because they have no time to prepare and are not going to pay attention to everything you're vomiting out there.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** UsefulNotes/DonaldTrump is a known Gish Galloper, having successfully used this and the Chewbacca Defense during the 2016 presidential primary debates to steamroll the other candidates with BlatantLies and word salads so they won't be able to rebut him coherently. However, his overuse of these tactics during the presidential debates with UsefulNotes/JoeBiden in 2020 were criticized as Biden was forced to shush him several times while trying to answer questions from the moderators.

to:

** UsefulNotes/DonaldTrump is a known Gish Galloper, having successfully used this and the Chewbacca Defense during the 2016 presidential primary debates to steamroll the other candidates with BlatantLies and word salads during the 2016 presidential primary debates so they won't be able to rebut him coherently. However, his overuse of these tactics this backfired on him as he was criticized for repeatedly heckling UsefulNotes/JoeBiden's attempts to answer the moderator's questions during the 2020 presidential debates with UsefulNotes/JoeBiden in 2020 were criticized as Biden was debates, which forced an irate Biden to shush him several times while trying to answer questions from the moderators.at one point.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** UsefulNotes/DonaldTrump is a known Gish Galloper, having successfully used this and the Chewbacca Defense during the 2016 presidential primary debates with an endless stream of BlatantLies, exaggerations, and nonsensical arguments so others won't be able to rebut and keep up with him.

to:

** UsefulNotes/DonaldTrump is a known Gish Galloper, having successfully used this and the Chewbacca Defense during the 2016 presidential primary debates to steamroll the other candidates with an endless stream of BlatantLies, exaggerations, BlatantLies and nonsensical arguments word salads so others they won't be able to rebut and keep up him coherently. However, his overuse of these tactics during the presidential debates with him.UsefulNotes/JoeBiden in 2020 were criticized as Biden was forced to shush him several times while trying to answer questions from the moderators.

Added: 288

Removed: 231

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** UsefulNotes/DonaldTrump is a known Gish Galloper, having successfully used this and the Chewbacca Defense during the 2016 presidential primary debates with an endless stream of BlatantLies, exaggerations, and nonsensical arguments so others won't be able to rebut and keep up with him.



*** Even during his presidency, UsefulNotes/DonaldTrump is a known Gish Galloper, having used this during debates with an endless stream of BlatantLies, exaggerations, and nonsensical arguments so others won't be able to rebut him.

Added: 231

Changed: 1

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Senator Mike Lee (R-UT) did this in his attack on the "Green New Deal", saying he would treat it with "the seriousness it deserves". This led to [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6fLd0duzT6g a speech]] which included pictures of [[WesternAnimation/{{Superfriends}} Aquaman riding a seahorse]], UsefulNotes/RonaldReagan riding a velociraptor shooting a gun, and [[Film/TheEmpireStrikesBack Luke Skywalker riding a tauntaun]]. It's perhaps the purest form of Chewbacca defense, in that it emphasizes a belief that the entire debate is nonsensical.

to:

** Senator Mike Lee (R-UT) did this in his attack on the "Green New Deal", saying he would treat it with "the seriousness it deserves". This led to [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6fLd0duzT6g a speech]] which included pictures of [[WesternAnimation/{{Superfriends}} Aquaman riding a seahorse]], UsefulNotes/RonaldReagan riding a velociraptor shooting a gun, and [[Film/TheEmpireStrikesBack Luke Skywalker riding a tauntaun]]. It's perhaps the purest form of Chewbacca defense, defense in that it emphasizes a belief that the entire debate is nonsensical.


Added DiffLines:

*** Even during his presidency, UsefulNotes/DonaldTrump is a known Gish Galloper, having used this during debates with an endless stream of BlatantLies, exaggerations, and nonsensical arguments so others won't be able to rebut him.

Top