Follow TV Tropes

Following

History Main / ArmedWithCanon

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Gary Sarli once explained that when contradictions arose (which would be inevitable given the scope of ''Star Wars'' at the time), authors were supposed to do their best to come up with creative explanations that reconciled both sides (George Lucas was not bound by this limitation). Whether the authors could rise to the occasion or fall to the worst aspects of this trope depended on the quality of the writer. However, it would explain why so many authors would address other works instead of ignoring them.

to:

** Gary Sarli once explained that when contradictions arose (which would be inevitable given the scope of ''Star Wars'' at the time), authors were supposed to do their best to come up with creative explanations that reconciled both sides (George sides, though George Lucas was not bound by this limitation).limitation. Whether the authors could rise to the occasion or fall to the worst aspects of this trope depended on the quality of the writer. However, it would explain why so many authors would address other works instead of ignoring them.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Curtis Saxton, originally a PromotedFanboy, wrote a lot of data in several technical manuals for ''Legends''. Unfortunately, he has been accused of trying to rewrite ''Franchise/StarWars'' to help the pro-''Star Wars'' side of the ''Star Wars'' vs. ''Franchise/StarTrek'' UltimateShowdownOfUltimateDestiny online debates curbstomp the Trekkies, and as such gave hugely inflated numbers for pretty much everything. [[SciFiWritersHaveNoSenseOfScale He and his fans argue that it is simply a consequence of what is shown onscreen.]] The acceleration needed to get to orbit as fast as is shown in ''Star Wars'' requires the ability to produce insane levels of firepower, as well as being consistent with what the Death Star does. Though the problem is that this is wholly inconsistent with what is observed in the rest of canonicity. Troop numbers are particularly problematic. He established that the Separatists have quintillions of droids based on the industrial potential shown by the Death Star. Given that the ''Film/AttackOfTheClones'' movie novelization, a higher canonical source than Saxton's manuals, implied that the "million more well on the way" was a million clone warriors, he had given the Separatists more than a trillion droids for every clone the other side had--then again, much of the reason Saxton made the argument to begin with was that a million clones being treated as a powerful fighting force in a galaxy where one faction treated "ten thousand star systems" as a minor detail in the same film is pretty ludicrous in itself (though the novelizations also established the Republic had a hundred thousand worlds, tens of thousands of star systems and trillions of commonfolk, so the droid numbers still ran into other issues).

to:

** Curtis Saxton, originally a PromotedFanboy, wrote a lot of data in several technical manuals for ''Legends''. Unfortunately, he has been accused of trying to rewrite ''Franchise/StarWars'' to help the pro-''Star Wars'' side of the ''Star Wars'' vs. ''Franchise/StarTrek'' UltimateShowdownOfUltimateDestiny online debates curbstomp the Trekkies, and as such gave hugely inflated numbers for pretty much everything. [[SciFiWritersHaveNoSenseOfScale He and his fans argue that it is simply a consequence of what is shown onscreen.]] The acceleration needed to get to orbit as fast as is shown in ''Star Wars'' requires the ability to produce insane levels of firepower, as well as being consistent with what the Death Star does. Though the problem is that this is wholly inconsistent with what is observed in the rest of canonicity. Troop numbers are particularly problematic. He established that the Separatists have quintillions of droids based on the industrial potential shown by the Death Star. Given that the ''Film/AttackOfTheClones'' movie novelization, a higher canonical source than Saxton's manuals, implied that the "million more well on the way" was a million clone warriors, he had given the Separatists more than a trillion droids for every clone the other side had--then again, much of the reason Saxton made the argument to begin with was that a million clones being treated as a powerful fighting force in a galaxy where one faction treated "ten thousand star systems" as a minor detail in the same film is pretty ludicrous in itself (though the novelizations also established the Republic had a hundred thousand worlds, tens of thousands of star systems and trillions of commonfolk, so the droid numbers still ran into other issues).issues, such as outnumbering everybody in the Republic by several orders of magnitude despite the Separatists either being greedy corporate overlords or officially people with genuine issues with the Republic, neither of whom would be interested in ludicrously overspending on armies).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* Following Chris Savino's blacklisting, new writers on ''WesternAnimation/TheLoudHouse'' abandoned any further plans he had for the series, including explaining why Lincoln has white hair. Now it's canon that he was just born with white hair. They also scrapped his original plot for ''WesternAnimation/TheLoudHouseMovie''.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* ''Series/StarTrekDeepSpaceNine'' was the master at this, especially regarding Creator/GeneRoddenberry's initial 24th century utopian vision. Since many of the staff on ''[=DS9=]'' worked on ''Series/StarTrekTheNextGeneration'', and were quite incensed at Roddenberry's most stringent rules (i.e. no conflict amongst the crew, no space pirates), they practically took every opportunity to show that, no, Starfleet and the Federation were not so perfect.
** The majority of the cast had a very DarkAndTroubledPast--Commander (later Captain) Sisko was a widower who lost his wife to the Borg at Wolf 359, Kira was a former ChildSoldier who spent her entire life fighting against the Cardassian occupation of her homeworld, Dr. Bashir was [[spoiler:a secret augment hiding his condition due to it being outlawed]], Chief [=O'Brien=] was a war veteran who became the show's resident ButtMonkey, and Odo was an alien shapeshifter who was treated as a lab experiment. Needless to say, they didn't always get along, ''especially'' at the beginning, but slowly grew into a dynamic where they could call one another friends. Even the, many of them would wind up crossing a lot of morally grey lines in the name of doing good once the Dominion War came about, especially Sisko. To say nothing of the fact that the other cast members were so morally ambiguous that it was impossible to tell their allegiance (Garak), driven by greed despite his own conscious (Quark), often too carefree for her own good (Jadzia), a stick-in-the-mud (Worf), initially an ExtremeDoormat (Rom), or stuck in the shadow of his own society's and family's failings (Nog). Compare this to the ''TNG'' cast, most of whom had pleasant lives and little character flaws, and almost always got along swimmingly.
** Roddenberry had always insisted that Starfleet and the Federation were perfect by the ''TNG'' era. Not so much according to the Maquis, who break off from Starfleet because they won't accept that they've been left to their own devices when the Federation leaves the border colonies between their space and the Cardassian Union open to the latter's machinations. They're right in that Cardassia can't be trusted, and that Starfleet's own policies are often as bad as their enemies, but Starfleet doesn't give a damn about the facts--except for the one that many of them are former officers who betrayed their oath and uniform, and hunt them down as punishment for their defection. And when the Dominion War rolls around, some in Starfleet like Admiral Layton take advantage of the chaos to try and stage a coup de grace for their own personal benefit. But even that's nothing compared to Section 31, a secret black ops organization that carries out all of Starfleet's dirty work behind the scenes while keeping their hands clean of the matter--including and up to infecting the entirety of the Founders with a genetic virus that will kill them to ensure the Federation wins the war. Even its most idealistic officers find itself crossing the line to win the war instead of taking the moral high ground, such as Sisko working with Garak to trick the Romulans into joining the Dominion War by faking evidence of a planned invasion of Romulus.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* When ''Series/StarTrekDiscovery'' premiered, it substantially revised the Klingon make-up from its ''TNG''-era design, with the tacit implication that this was what Klingons had always "really" looked like, and we just hadn't seen them properly with the old make-up. Starting with ''WesternAnimation/StarTrekLowerDecks'', every subsequent ''Star Trek'' series, including the direct ''Discovery'' spin-off ''Series/StarTrekStrangeNewWorlds'', has depicted ''TNG''-style Klingons.


Added DiffLines:

** Given that ''Picard'' effectively had a different showrunner for each of its three seasons, there's a fair amount of this even within the series:
*** Season one, under Creator/MichaelChabon, establishes a whole crew of new characters who are almost all unceremoniously written out, killed off, or simply ignored during the subsequent two seasons.
*** Season one also establishes that Picard has been resigned from Starfleet for the past fourteen years as a form of protest against the organization's xenophobic turn. Season two opens with Picard having returned to Starfleet between seasons. Season three, under Creator/TerryMatalas, shows Picard proudly claiming that "Starfleet was the only family that he ever needed" during a flashback set during this period.
*** Season two, under Creator/AkivaGoldsman, sets up a Federation-aligned splinter sect of Borg led by Dr. Jurati, who protect the Alpha Quadrant against a mysterious new threat. [[AbortedArc This whole situation is referenced precisely once in the third season in a very dismissive way, and then never again, even when it would be extremely relevant to the plot.]]
*** Season two also kills off Q under mysterious circumstances. The post-credits scene in the season three finale reveals that he's actually still alive (or, at least, that he can still appear from a point before his death in his own subjective timeline).
*** Season one ends with the last remnant of Data's consciousness voluntarily dying with dignity. Season three brings him back, with a bit of dialogue that seemingly exists only to reassure the viewer that his previous death scene was still poignant.
*** Season one depicts Riker and Troi happily retired to the planet Nepenthe. [[CerebusRetCon Season three reveals that they actually hate living on Nepenthe, and that Troi was psychically undermining Riker's ability to mourn his son without consent.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Misplaced, moving to the correct tab


* ''Film/Deadpool2'': [[spoiler:During the end, after Wade uses Cable's time-travel device to give Vanessa's killer a cream cheese spreader in the brain, his other stops include 2009 for the Weapon X Deadpool entrance scene from ''Film/XMenOriginsWolverine'', that movie's version of the character notorious for not being well-received. A bullet in Weapon X's head cleans up the timeline.]]



* There were at least 46 writers for ''{{Series/Smallville}}''. Apparent lack of coordination made the show seem to have a very split personality, with wildly clashing tones, contradictory characterisation, and horrendous amounts of ContinuitySnarl, and even the writers themselves engaged in their own ShipToShipCombat or promoted their own favourite characters.



Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* ''Ferris Bueller'', the television series based on the [[Film/FerrisBuellersDayOff 1986 film]], did this in the first scene of the first episode. TV Ferris takes out a cardboard cutout of Creator/MatthewBroderick as movie Ferris and ''chainsaws it in half.'' Other noteworthy changes include gratuitously moved the show from Chicago to Santa Monica and reusing the show's theme song (clearly inspired by the film's song "Oh, Yeah" by Yello) as various musical stings throughout the episode. As a result from this, the poor ratings and reviews, and greater interest in dueling show ''Series/ParkerLewisCantLose'' (which paid more homage to the film, albeit in a subtle, nuanced way) and lasted three seasons, it was cancelled after 13 episodes.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

*** Everything Ed Greenwood writes is canon. However, a lot of his views about how much of a FreeLoveFuture Faerun is (such as embracing incestuous relationships) are not well-received by other writers or by Wizards of the Coast, and they usually ignore it and never mention it in sourcebooks or other novels.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** A Riot writer once said they liked the Jarvan IV/Quinn ship, seemingly sinking the fan-preferred Jarvan IV/Shyvana and Quinn/Talon ships. The writers of the ''Lux'' comic not only threw this out the window, but very heavily implied Jarvan IV is in love with Shyvana. Jarvan IV/Shyvana was further teased in the Star Guardian universe, with Senna shipping the two.

to:

** A Riot writer once said they liked the Jarvan IV/Quinn ship, seemingly sinking the fan-preferred Jarvan IV/Shyvana and Quinn/Talon ships. The writers of the ''Lux'' comic not only threw this out the window, but very heavily implied Jarvan IV is in love with Shyvana. Jarvan IV/Shyvana was further teased in the Star Guardian universe, with Senna shipping the two. The writers of ''VideoGame/TheMageseeker'' then promoted the Jarvan IV/Shyvana ship to unambiguous canon.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Curtis Saxton, originally a PromotedFanboy, wrote a lot of data in several technical manuals for ''Legends''. Unfortunately, he has been accused of trying to rewrite ''Franchise/StarWars'' to help the pro-''Star Wars'' side of the ''Star Wars'' vs. ''Franchise/StarTrek'' UltimateShowdownOfUltimateDestiny online debates curbstomp the Trekkies, and as such gave hugely inflated numbers for pretty much everything. [[SciFiWritersHaveNoSenseOfScale He and his fans argue that it is simply a consequence of what is shown onscreen.]] The acceleration needed to get to orbit as fast as is shown in ''Star Wars'' requires the ability to produce insane levels of firepower, as well as being consistent with what the Death Star does. Though the problem is that this is wholly inconsistent with what is observed in the rest of canonicity. Troop numbers are particularly problematic. He established that the Separatists have quintillions of droids based on the industrial potential shown by the Death Star. Given that the ''Film/AttackOfTheClones'' movie novelization, a higher canonical source than Saxton's manuals, implied that the "million more well on the way" was a million clone warriors, he had given the Separatists more than a trillion droids for every clone the other side had--then again, much of the reason Saxton made the argument to begin with was that a million clones being treated as a powerful fighting force in a galaxy where one faction treated "ten thousand star systems" as a minor detail in the same film is pretty ludicrous in itself.

to:

** Curtis Saxton, originally a PromotedFanboy, wrote a lot of data in several technical manuals for ''Legends''. Unfortunately, he has been accused of trying to rewrite ''Franchise/StarWars'' to help the pro-''Star Wars'' side of the ''Star Wars'' vs. ''Franchise/StarTrek'' UltimateShowdownOfUltimateDestiny online debates curbstomp the Trekkies, and as such gave hugely inflated numbers for pretty much everything. [[SciFiWritersHaveNoSenseOfScale He and his fans argue that it is simply a consequence of what is shown onscreen.]] The acceleration needed to get to orbit as fast as is shown in ''Star Wars'' requires the ability to produce insane levels of firepower, as well as being consistent with what the Death Star does. Though the problem is that this is wholly inconsistent with what is observed in the rest of canonicity. Troop numbers are particularly problematic. He established that the Separatists have quintillions of droids based on the industrial potential shown by the Death Star. Given that the ''Film/AttackOfTheClones'' movie novelization, a higher canonical source than Saxton's manuals, implied that the "million more well on the way" was a million clone warriors, he had given the Separatists more than a trillion droids for every clone the other side had--then again, much of the reason Saxton made the argument to begin with was that a million clones being treated as a powerful fighting force in a galaxy where one faction treated "ten thousand star systems" as a minor detail in the same film is pretty ludicrous in itself.itself (though the novelizations also established the Republic had a hundred thousand worlds, tens of thousands of star systems and trillions of commonfolk, so the droid numbers still ran into other issues).

Added: 745

Changed: 5

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ''Series/{{Community}}'' does this a bunch of times. The reasons for which all center on the removal of the original creator -- Dan Harmon -- in the fourth season. When Harmon later picked up the show again, he was not too pleased with many of the decisions made in the fourth season.

to:

* ''Series/{{Community}}'' does this a bunch of times. The times, the reasons for which all center on the removal of the original creator -- Dan Harmon -- in the fourth season. When Harmon later picked up the show again, he was not too pleased with many of the decisions made in the fourth season.



** Templar Studios' web content and the first three DirectToVideo movies occasionally alluded to romances. The Hewkii-Macku ship was pushed by website manager Leah Weston Kaae, while the Jaller-Hahli pairing was also implied in the ''Mask of Light'' movie. Farshtey held onto a NoHuggingNoKissing rule to avoid dealing with implications of robot romance in a children's franchise, dismissing most examples of love as non-canon. Sidorak's engagement to Roodaka in ''Web of Shadows'', which was integral to the plot, was written off as merely a political alliance. Oddly, Matau's affection to Nokama from ''Legends of Metru Nui'' was also referenced in Greg's writings but he denied it was a romance, despite the scriptwriters' intent.

to:

** Templar Studios' web content and the first three DirectToVideo movies occasionally alluded to romances. The Hewkii-Macku ship was pushed by website manager Leah Weston Kaae, while the Jaller-Hahli pairing was also implied in the ''Mask of Light'' movie. Farshtey held onto a NoHuggingNoKissing rule to avoid dealing with implications of robot romance in a children's franchise, dismissing most examples of love as non-canon. Sidorak's engagement to Roodaka in ''Web of Shadows'', which was integral to the plot, was written off as merely a political alliance. Oddly, Matau's affection to Nokama from ''Legends of Metru Nui'' was also referenced in Greg's writings writings, but he denied it was a romance, despite the scriptwriters' intent.intent.
* ''VisualNovel/FateStayNight'' [[FixFic attempts]] to give [[Myth/ArthurianLegend King Arthur]] a happier death than [[GenderSwap she]] had in canon [[AdaptationExpansion while still respecting canonical events]]. Basically, as she lies dying, OutsideContextMagic whisks her away to a future time where she works through her trauma [[FixerSue with a cute OC]], enjoys exotic food, and fights battles that are totally awesome and not morally gray in the least. When the time comes, she returns to her previous life, [[SugarWiki/SweetDreamsFuel content in the knowledge that idealism will always triumph]]. The part of the game that focuses on her, regardless of a few gory moments, reads like the BreatherEpisode that Arthurian legend never had.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Shared world anthologies were a big thing in fantasy and science fiction literature from the late 1970s to the early 1990s. The longer a particular series lasted, the greater the chance of rival creators in the same series starting taking potshots at each other (Literature/ThievesWorld had plenty of mean-spirited "my character humiliates your character" moments). When Creator/GeorgeRRMartin started Literature/WildCards, he was very aware of the problem, because he and assistant editor Creator/MelindaSnodgrass created an entire ''legal framework'' for their writers to prohibit this sort of unpleasantness. To wit, whenever you want to use another writer's character and concepts in your story, you need that writer express permission and the original writer has veto power over every little detail in how their characters are used. In practice, this encouraged close cooperation instead of competitiviness. With 40+ novels published, Wild Cards is the last man standing in the genre of original shared worlds, and has never suffered from this issue.

to:

* Shared world anthologies were a big thing in fantasy and science fiction literature from the late 1970s to the early 1990s. The longer a particular series lasted, the greater the chance of rival creators in the same series starting taking potshots at each other (Literature/ThievesWorld had plenty of mean-spirited "my character humiliates your character" moments). When Creator/GeorgeRRMartin started Literature/WildCards, he was very aware of the problem, because he and assistant editor Creator/MelindaSnodgrass created an entire ''legal framework'' for their writers to prohibit this sort of unpleasantness. To wit, whenever you want to use another writer's character and concepts in your story, you need that writer express permission and the original writer has veto power over every little detail in how their characters are used. In practice, this encouraged close cooperation instead of competitiviness. With 40+ 30+ novels published, Wild Cards is the last man standing in the genre of original shared worlds, and has never suffered from this issue.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Shared world anthologies were a big thing in fantasy and science fiction literature from the late 1970s to the early 1990s. The longer a particular series lasted, the greater the chance of rival creators in the same series starting taking potshots at each other (Literature/ThievesWorld had plenty of mean-spirited "my character humiliates your character" moments). When Creator/GeorgeRRMartin started Literature/WildCards, he was very aware of the problem, because he and assistant editor Creator/MelindaSnodgrass created an entire ''legal framework'' for their writers to prohibit this sort of unpleasantness. To wit, whenever you want to use another writer's character and concepts in your story, you need that writer express permission and the original writer has veto power over every little detail in how their characters are used. In practice, this encouraged close cooperation instead of competitiviness. With 40+ novels published, Wild Cards is the last man standing in the genre of original shared worlds, and has never had this issue.

to:

* Shared world anthologies were a big thing in fantasy and science fiction literature from the late 1970s to the early 1990s. The longer a particular series lasted, the greater the chance of rival creators in the same series starting taking potshots at each other (Literature/ThievesWorld had plenty of mean-spirited "my character humiliates your character" moments). When Creator/GeorgeRRMartin started Literature/WildCards, he was very aware of the problem, because he and assistant editor Creator/MelindaSnodgrass created an entire ''legal framework'' for their writers to prohibit this sort of unpleasantness. To wit, whenever you want to use another writer's character and concepts in your story, you need that writer express permission and the original writer has veto power over every little detail in how their characters are used. In practice, this encouraged close cooperation instead of competitiviness. With 40+ novels published, Wild Cards is the last man standing in the genre of original shared worlds, and has never had suffered from this issue.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Shared world anthologies were a big thing in fantasy and science fiction literature from the late 1970s to the early 1990s. The longer a particular series lasted, the greater the chance of rival creators in the same series starting taking potshots at each other (Literature/ThievesWorld had plenty of mean-spirited "my character humiliates your character" moments). When GeorgeRRMartin started Literature/WildCards, he was very aware of the problem, because he and assistant editor MelindaSnodgrass created an entire ''legal framework'' for their writers to prohibit this sort of unpleasantness. To wit, whenever you want to use another writer's character and concepts in your story, you need that writer express permission and the original writer has veto power over every little detail in how their characters are used. In practice, this encouraged close cooperation instead of competitiviness. With 40+ novels published, Wild Cards is the last man standing in the genre of original shared worlds, and has never had this issue.


to:

* Shared world anthologies were a big thing in fantasy and science fiction literature from the late 1970s to the early 1990s. The longer a particular series lasted, the greater the chance of rival creators in the same series starting taking potshots at each other (Literature/ThievesWorld had plenty of mean-spirited "my character humiliates your character" moments). When GeorgeRRMartin Creator/GeorgeRRMartin started Literature/WildCards, he was very aware of the problem, because he and assistant editor MelindaSnodgrass Creator/MelindaSnodgrass created an entire ''legal framework'' for their writers to prohibit this sort of unpleasantness. To wit, whenever you want to use another writer's character and concepts in your story, you need that writer express permission and the original writer has veto power over every little detail in how their characters are used. In practice, this encouraged close cooperation instead of competitiviness. With 40+ novels published, Wild Cards is the last man standing in the genre of original shared worlds, and has never had this issue.

issue.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* Shared world anthologies were a big thing in fantasy and science fiction literature from the late 1970s to the early 1990s. The longer a particular series lasted, the greater the chance of rival creators in the same series starting taking potshots at each other (Literature/ThievesWorld had plenty of mean-spirited "my character humiliates your character" moments). When GeorgeRRMartin started Literature/WildCards, he was very aware of the problem, because he and assistant editor MelindaSnodgrass created an entire ''legal framework'' for their writers to prohibit this sort of unpleasantness. To wit, whenever you want to use another writer's character and concepts in your story, you need that writer express permission and the original writer has veto power over every little detail in how their characters are used. In practice, this encouraged close cooperation instead of competitiviness. With 40+ novels published, Wild Cards is the last man standing in the genre of original shared worlds, and has never had this issue.

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Myth/ArthurianLegend is in the public domain, so naturally a lot of authors have published their own takes on it. Even the [[Literature/LeMorteDArthur Thomas Malory adaptation]] that most modern adaptations are based off of had to cut contradictory or irrelevant parts of the source material. That's what happens when you compress ''multiple'' legends into one story and can't just go by one copyrighted canon. When one bard tells the legend as a tragedy and another tells it as ye olde action movie, how do you decide which version to keep?

to:

* Myth/ArthurianLegend is in the public domain, so naturally a lot of authors have published their own takes on it. Even the [[Literature/LeMorteDArthur [[Literature/LeMorteDarthur Thomas Malory adaptation]] that most modern adaptations are based off of had to cut contradictory or irrelevant parts of the source material. That's what happens when you compress ''multiple'' legends into one story and can't just go by one copyrighted canon. When one bard tells the legend as a tragedy and another tells it as ye olde action movie, how do you decide which version to keep?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


-->-- '''Creator/AmbroseBierce''' [[note]]from ''The Devil's Dictionary'' definition of "serial"[[/note]]

to:

-->-- '''Creator/AmbroseBierce''' [[note]]from ''The Devil's Dictionary'' definition of "serial"[[/note]]
-->--''Literature/TheDevilsDictionary'' by '''Creator/AmbroseBierce''', "Serial"
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** It remains a point of debate regarding the Classic Timeline whether Ben's FutureBadass self Ben 10,000 as seen in the eponymous episode is from his own future or an AlternateTimeline thanks to multiple contradictions, such as the episode stating that Grandpa Max's birthday cake [[ForWantOfANail was a major factor in whether that future came to pass]] and Kevin's HeelFaceTurn in later installments being in stark opposition to him being a villain in that episode. The showrunners of ''[[WesternAnimation/Ben10Omniverse Omniverse]]'' insisted that it was Ben's inevitable future, and as such, the series devotes a number of episodes to setup said future, including bringing back a character that hadn't been seen in years [[StrangledByTheRedString as his main love interest]]. However, others have their own takes: Creator/DwayneMcDuffie (showrunner of ''[[WesternAnimation/Ben10AlienForce Alien Force]]'' and ''[[WesternAnimation/Ben10UltimateAlien Ultimate Alien]]'') and Matt Wayne (longtime series writer) believed that the timeline diverged after the events of that original episode; meanwhile, [[Creator/ManOfActionStudios Duncan Rouleau]] (one of the franchise's creators) has [[ShrugOfGod no strong feelings on the matter]]. Due to the logical inconsistencies, the Ben 10 Wiki and the fandom at large side with [=McDuffie=] and Wayne.

to:

** It remains a point of debate regarding the Classic Timeline whether Ben's FutureBadass self Ben 10,000 as seen in the eponymous episode is from his own future or an AlternateTimeline thanks to multiple contradictions, such as the episode stating that Grandpa Max's birthday cake [[ForWantOfANail [[PointOfDivergence was a major factor in whether that future came to pass]] and Kevin's HeelFaceTurn in later installments being in stark opposition to him being a villain in that episode. The showrunners of ''[[WesternAnimation/Ben10Omniverse Omniverse]]'' insisted that it was Ben's inevitable future, and as such, the series devotes a number of episodes to setup said future, including bringing back a character that hadn't been seen in years [[StrangledByTheRedString as his main love interest]]. However, others have their own takes: Creator/DwayneMcDuffie (showrunner of ''[[WesternAnimation/Ben10AlienForce Alien Force]]'' and ''[[WesternAnimation/Ben10UltimateAlien Ultimate Alien]]'') and Matt Wayne (longtime series writer) believed that the timeline diverged after the events of that original episode; meanwhile, [[Creator/ManOfActionStudios Duncan Rouleau]] (one of the franchise's creators) has [[ShrugOfGod no strong feelings on the matter]]. Due to the logical inconsistencies, the Ben 10 Wiki and the fandom at large side with [=McDuffie=] and Wayne.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:


* In ''Anime/RebuildOfEvangelion,'' screenwriter Yoji Enokido argued that [[spoiler:Rei]] should survive the end of the second movie, [[SparedByTheAdaptation despite dying in the source material]]. However, at least one of the films' directors wanted to give their replacement, [[spoiler:[[OpeningACanOfClones another Rei]]]], more CharacterDevelopment in this adaptation, so the third movie reveals that said character died after all. (Well, [[OnlyMostlyDead more or less]].)

to:

* In ''Anime/RebuildOfEvangelion,'' screenwriter Yoji Enokido argued that [[spoiler:Rei]] [[spoiler:Rei Ayanami]] should survive the end of the second movie, [[SparedByTheAdaptation despite dying in the source material]]. However, at least one of the films' directors wanted to give their replacement, [[spoiler:[[OpeningACanOfClones another Rei]]]], more CharacterDevelopment in this adaptation, so the third movie reveals that said character died after all. (Well, [[OnlyMostlyDead more or less]].)

Top