Follow TV Tropes

Following

History Literature / Timeline

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* TrappedInThePast: Happens to several charcters, for varying levels of "trapped." [[spoiler:Deckard]] has insinuated himself into the court of one of the warring nobles after being left behind, becoming [[spoiler:de Kere]]. [[spoiler:Marek]] ultimately chooses to stay behind voluntarily. Finally, [[spoiler: Doniger]] receives this treatment as a sort of temporal ThrownOutTheAirlock, being sent back to the midst of the Black Death epidemic.

to:

* TrappedInThePast: Happens to several charcters, for varying levels of "trapped." [[spoiler:Deckard]] has insinuated himself into the court of one of the warring nobles after being left behind, becoming [[spoiler:de Kere]]. [[spoiler:Marek]] ultimately chooses to stay behind voluntarily. Finally, [[spoiler: Doniger]] receives this treatment as a sort of temporal ThrownOutTheAirlock, being sent back to the midst of the Black Death epidemic.[[note]]In his case, it's stated he keeps a return marker on him at all times in his shoe, but it's stuck in too far for him to remove it with his own hands. It's only when Doniger looks for tools in the town to do so that he realizes when he's been sent, and that it's too late for him to do anything.[[/note]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* AdaptationalHeroism: Arnaud is changed from a cruel, ruthless warlord into a noble warrior who fights for justice.

to:

* AdaptationalHeroism: Arnaud is changed from a cruel, ruthless warlord (who at best was ALighterShadeOfGrey compared to Lord Oliver) into a noble warrior who fights for justice.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* AdaptationalAttractiveness: In the film, he's portrayed by the suave Martin Sheen. In the book, however...

to:

* AdaptationalAttractiveness: In the film, he's portrayed by the suave Martin Michael Sheen. In the book, however...
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* AdaptationalAttractiveness: In the film, he's portrayed by the suave Martin Sheen. In the book, however...
--> ''Lord Oliver de Vannes was about thirty, with small eyes set in a fleshy, dissolute face. His mouth was permanently turned down in a sneer; he tended to keep his lips tight, since he was missing several teeth.''
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* SanitySlippage: What happens to people who use the time machine too much and accumulate errors.


Added DiffLines:

* UsedToBeASweetKid: By all accounts Robert Deckard/Roderick de Kere was a NiceGuy, but too many errors turned him into an AxCrazy {{Jerkass}}.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* AffablyEvil: Arnaut de Cervole is impeccably polite, keeps his word, and is far more reasonable than Lord Oliver.


Added DiffLines:

* EvilVsEvil: Arnaut and Lord Oliver are both pretty bad, though Arnaut is ALighterShadeOfBlack.

Added: 133

Removed: 133

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* MenAreTheExpendableGender: Averted, the first character to be killed is female, and also an [[BlackDudeDiesFirst ethnic minority]].



* MenAreTheExpendableGender: Averted, the first character to be killed is female, and also an [[BlackDudeDiesFirst ethnic minority]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* CunningLinguist: De Kere is dismissed as being their rival time traveler despite being everyone's first guess because he speaks the language far too well for the short time he'd have been there. It turns out he's just learns languages quickly.

to:

* CunningLinguist: De Kere is dismissed as being their rival time traveler despite being everyone's first guess because he speaks the language far too well for the short time he'd have been there. It turns out he's he just learns languages quickly.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* DungAges: {{Subverted}} and mocked. The protagonist walks around, expecting horribly disgusting conditions, but is surprised to learn everyone is reasonably well kept. In the afterward, Crichton notes this was mostly an invention of the Renaissance, during which many scholars romanticized the Classical period above their own era. Personal hygiene declined significantly only once the Black Plague became epidemic (which started around the time the book is set), when the public baths that were common in most Medieval towns and cities became disease vectors. This made frequent bathing a hazard, and it was denounced as sinful. Unfortunately, because of this, the post-Black Death cultural attitude towards bathing went too far in the other direction, with people throwing refuse right onto the streets and monarchs like Isabella I of Spain boasting of only bathing a few times in their ''entire lives''. A servant insists that Chris is not clean enough after he washes himself, to his surprise, and scrubs him quite thoroughly.

to:

* DungAges: {{Subverted}} and mocked. The protagonist walks around, expecting horribly disgusting conditions, but is surprised to learn everyone is reasonably well kept. In the afterward, Crichton notes this was mostly an invention of the Renaissance, during which many scholars romanticized the Classical period above their own era. Personal hygiene declined significantly only once the Black Plague became epidemic (which started around the time the book is set), when the public baths that were common in most Medieval towns and cities became disease vectors. This made frequent bathing a hazard, and it was denounced as sinful. Unfortunately, because Because of this, the post-Black Death cultural attitude towards bathing went too far in the other direction, with people throwing refuse right onto the streets and monarchs like Isabella I of Spain boasting of only bathing a few times in their ''entire lives''. A servant insists that Chris is not clean enough after he washes himself, to his surprise, and scrubs him quite thoroughly.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* DungAges: {{Subverted}} and mocked. The protagonist walks around, expecting horribly disgusting conditions, but is surprised to learn everyone is reasonably well kept. In the afterward, Crichton notes this was mostly an invention of the Renaissance, during which many scholars romanticized the Classical period above their own era. Personal hygiene declined significantly only once the Black Plague became epidemic (which started around the time the book is set), when the public baths that were common in most Medieval towns and cities became disease vectors. This made frequent bathing a hazard, and it was denounced as sinful. Sanitation in most of Europe was already poor, though-people threw refuse right onto the streets. Unfortunately, because of this, the post-Black Death cultural attitude towards bathing went too far in the other direction, with people monarchs like Isabella I of Spain boasting of only bathing a few times in their ''entire lives''. A servant insists that Chris is not clean enough after he washes himself, to his surprise, and scrubs him quite thoroughly.

to:

* DungAges: {{Subverted}} and mocked. The protagonist walks around, expecting horribly disgusting conditions, but is surprised to learn everyone is reasonably well kept. In the afterward, Crichton notes this was mostly an invention of the Renaissance, during which many scholars romanticized the Classical period above their own era. Personal hygiene declined significantly only once the Black Plague became epidemic (which started around the time the book is set), when the public baths that were common in most Medieval towns and cities became disease vectors. This made frequent bathing a hazard, and it was denounced as sinful. Sanitation in most of Europe was already poor, though-people threw refuse right onto the streets. Unfortunately, because of this, the post-Black Death cultural attitude towards bathing went too far in the other direction, with people throwing refuse right onto the streets and monarchs like Isabella I of Spain boasting of only bathing a few times in their ''entire lives''. A servant insists that Chris is not clean enough after he washes himself, to his surprise, and scrubs him quite thoroughly.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
It was already common before the Black Plague to chuck refuse out into the streets.


* DungAges: {{Subverted}} and mocked. The protagonist walks around, expecting horribly disgusting conditions, but is surprised to learn everyone is reasonably well kept. In the afterward, Crichton notes this was mostly an invention of the Renaissance, during which many scholars romanticized the Classical period above their own era. Personal hygiene declined significantly only once the Black Plague became epidemic (which started around the time the book is set), when the public baths that were common in most Medieval towns and cities became disease vectors. This made frequent bathing a hazard, and it was denounced as sinful. Unfortunately, because of this, the post-Black Death cultural attitude towards bathing went too far in the other direction, with people throwing human waste onto the streets and monarchs like Isabella I of Spain boasting of only bathing a few times in their ''entire lives''. A servant insists that Chris is not clean enough after he washes himself, to his surprise, and scrubs him quite thoroughly.

to:

* DungAges: {{Subverted}} and mocked. The protagonist walks around, expecting horribly disgusting conditions, but is surprised to learn everyone is reasonably well kept. In the afterward, Crichton notes this was mostly an invention of the Renaissance, during which many scholars romanticized the Classical period above their own era. Personal hygiene declined significantly only once the Black Plague became epidemic (which started around the time the book is set), when the public baths that were common in most Medieval towns and cities became disease vectors. This made frequent bathing a hazard, and it was denounced as sinful. Sanitation in most of Europe was already poor, though-people threw refuse right onto the streets. Unfortunately, because of this, the post-Black Death cultural attitude towards bathing went too far in the other direction, with people throwing human waste onto the streets and people monarchs like Isabella I of Spain boasting of only bathing a few times in their ''entire lives''. A servant insists that Chris is not clean enough after he washes himself, to his surprise, and scrubs him quite thoroughly.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ArmiesAreEvil: This is one of many works that presents a negative view of medieval warfare. One of the team even goes so far as to claim that when castles finally fell after sieges, ''everyone'' inside them was killed, and talks of pregnant women being disemboweled (naturally, some historians believe that this was TruthInTelevision, judging from the chronicles of the time, while others suspect that the chroniclers themselves were exaggerating the atrocities, making the RapePillageAndBurn trope essentially the medieval equivalent to the modern EveryCarIsAPinto trope). It was considered acceptable to kill people if cities resisted once their walls were breached, but usually not ''all'' citizens would be killed. In fact, more often than not, it was just the garrison who tried to protect the city that got the brunt of the slaughter. Regardless, cities would be given a chance to surrender once the siege started, which spared them. If the city surrendered after the walls were breached, they would be subject to a milder sacking.

to:

* ArmiesAreEvil: This is one of many works that presents a negative view of medieval warfare. One of the team even goes so far as to claim that when castles finally fell after sieges, ''everyone'' inside them was killed, and talks of pregnant women being disemboweled (naturally, some historians believe that this was TruthInTelevision, judging from the chronicles of the time, while others suspect that the chroniclers themselves were exaggerating the atrocities, making the RapePillageAndBurn trope essentially the medieval equivalent to the modern EveryCarIsAPinto trope). [[note]] It was considered acceptable to kill people if cities resisted once their walls were breached, but usually not ''all'' citizens would be killed. In fact, more often than not, it was just the garrison who tried to protect the city that got the brunt of the slaughter. Regardless, cities would be given a chance to surrender once the siege started, which spared them. If the city surrendered after the walls were breached, they would be subject to a milder sacking. [[/note]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ArmiesAreEvil: This is one of many works that presents a negative view of medieval warfare. One of the team even goes so far as to claim that when castles finally fell after sieges, ''everyone'' inside them was killed, and talks of pregnant women being disemboweled (naturally, some historians believe that this was TruthInTelevision, judging from the chronicles of the time, while others suspect that the chroniclers themselves were exaggerating the atrocities, making the RapePillageAndBurn trope essentially the medieval equivalent to the modern EveryCarIsAPinto trope). It was considered acceptable to do this if cities resisted once their walls were breached, but usually not ''all'' citizens would be killed. Regardless, cities would be given a chance to surrender once the siege started, which spared them. If the city surrendered after the walls were breached, they would be subject to a milder sacking.

to:

* ArmiesAreEvil: This is one of many works that presents a negative view of medieval warfare. One of the team even goes so far as to claim that when castles finally fell after sieges, ''everyone'' inside them was killed, and talks of pregnant women being disemboweled (naturally, some historians believe that this was TruthInTelevision, judging from the chronicles of the time, while others suspect that the chroniclers themselves were exaggerating the atrocities, making the RapePillageAndBurn trope essentially the medieval equivalent to the modern EveryCarIsAPinto trope). It was considered acceptable to do this kill people if cities resisted once their walls were breached, but usually not ''all'' citizens would be killed.killed. In fact, more often than not, it was just the garrison who tried to protect the city that got the brunt of the slaughter. Regardless, cities would be given a chance to surrender once the siege started, which spared them. If the city surrendered after the walls were breached, they would be subject to a milder sacking.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ArmiesAreEvil: This is one of many works that presents a negative view of medieval warfare. One of the team even goes so far as to claim that when castles finally fell after sieges, ''everyone'' inside them was killed, and talks of pregnant women being disemboweled (Naturally, some historians believe that this was TruthInTelevision, judging from the chronicles of the time, while others suspect that the chroniclers themselves were exaggerating the atrocities, making the RapePillageAndBurn trope essentially the medieval equivalent to the modern EveryCarIsAPinto trope).

to:

* ArmiesAreEvil: This is one of many works that presents a negative view of medieval warfare. One of the team even goes so far as to claim that when castles finally fell after sieges, ''everyone'' inside them was killed, and talks of pregnant women being disemboweled (Naturally, (naturally, some historians believe that this was TruthInTelevision, judging from the chronicles of the time, while others suspect that the chroniclers themselves were exaggerating the atrocities, making the RapePillageAndBurn trope essentially the medieval equivalent to the modern EveryCarIsAPinto trope).trope). It was considered acceptable to do this if cities resisted once their walls were breached, but usually not ''all'' citizens would be killed. Regardless, cities would be given a chance to surrender once the siege started, which spared them. If the city surrendered after the walls were breached, they would be subject to a milder sacking.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* DungAges: {{Subverted}} and mocked. The protagonist walks around, expecting horribly disgusting conditions, but is surprised to learn everyone is reasonably well kept. In the afterward, Crichton notes this was mostly an invention of the Renaissance, during which many scholars romanticized the Classical period above their own era. Personal hygiene declined significantly only once the Black Plague became epidemic (which started around the time the book is set), when the public baths that were common in most Medieval towns and cities became disease vectors. This made frequent bathing a hazard, and it was denounced as sinful. Unfortunately, because of this, the cultural attitude went too far in the other direction, and monarchs after this like Isabella I of Spain boasted of only bathing a few times in their ''entire lives''. A servant insists that Chris is not clean enough after he washes himself, to his surprise, and scrubs him quite thoroughly.

to:

* DungAges: {{Subverted}} and mocked. The protagonist walks around, expecting horribly disgusting conditions, but is surprised to learn everyone is reasonably well kept. In the afterward, Crichton notes this was mostly an invention of the Renaissance, during which many scholars romanticized the Classical period above their own era. Personal hygiene declined significantly only once the Black Plague became epidemic (which started around the time the book is set), when the public baths that were common in most Medieval towns and cities became disease vectors. This made frequent bathing a hazard, and it was denounced as sinful. Unfortunately, because of this, the post-Black Death cultural attitude towards bathing went too far in the other direction, with people throwing human waste onto the streets and monarchs after this like Isabella I of Spain boasted boasting of only bathing a few times in their ''entire lives''. A servant insists that Chris is not clean enough after he washes himself, to his surprise, and scrubs him quite thoroughly.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* DungAges: {{Subverted}} and mocked. The protagonist walks around, expecting horribly disgusting conditions, but is surprised to learn everyone is reasonably well kept. In the afterward, Crichton notes this was mostly an invention of the Renaissance, during which many scholars romanticized the Classical period above their own era. Personal hygiene declined significantly only once the Black Plague became epidemic (which started around the time the book is set), when the public baths that were common in most Medieval towns and cities became disease vectors. This made frequent bathing a hazard, and it was denounced as sinful, which became part of the culture. Sanitation in most of Europe was already poor, though-people threw refuse right onto the streets. Unfortunately the cultural attitude went too far in the other direction, culture and monarchs after this like Isabella I of Spain boasted of only bathing a few times in their ''entire lives''. A servant insists that Chris is not clean enough after he washes himself, to his surprise, and scrubs him quite thoroughly.

to:

* DungAges: {{Subverted}} and mocked. The protagonist walks around, expecting horribly disgusting conditions, but is surprised to learn everyone is reasonably well kept. In the afterward, Crichton notes this was mostly an invention of the Renaissance, during which many scholars romanticized the Classical period above their own era. Personal hygiene declined significantly only once the Black Plague became epidemic (which started around the time the book is set), when the public baths that were common in most Medieval towns and cities became disease vectors. This made frequent bathing a hazard, and it was denounced as sinful, which became part sinful. Unfortunately, because of the culture. Sanitation in most of Europe was already poor, though-people threw refuse right onto the streets. Unfortunately this, the cultural attitude went too far in the other direction, culture and monarchs after this like Isabella I of Spain boasted of only bathing a few times in their ''entire lives''. A servant insists that Chris is not clean enough after he washes himself, to his surprise, and scrubs him quite thoroughly.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ArmiesAreEvil: This is one of many works that presents a negative view of medieval warfare. One of the team even goes so far as to claim that when castles finally fell after sieges, ''everyone'' inside them was killed, and talks of pregnant women being disemboweled (Naturally, some historians believe that this was TruthInTelevision, judging from the chronicles of the time, while others suspect that the chroniclers themselves were exaggerating the atrocities, making the KillEmAll trope essentially the medieval equivalent to the modern EveryCarIsAPinto trope).

to:

* ArmiesAreEvil: This is one of many works that presents a negative view of medieval warfare. One of the team even goes so far as to claim that when castles finally fell after sieges, ''everyone'' inside them was killed, and talks of pregnant women being disemboweled (Naturally, some historians believe that this was TruthInTelevision, judging from the chronicles of the time, while others suspect that the chroniclers themselves were exaggerating the atrocities, making the KillEmAll RapePillageAndBurn trope essentially the medieval equivalent to the modern EveryCarIsAPinto trope).

Added: 566

Changed: 15

Removed: 567

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ArmiesAreEvil: This is one of many works that presents a negative view of medieval warfare. One of the team even goes so far as to claim that when castles finally fell after sieges, ''everyone'' inside them was killed, and talks of pregnant women being disemboweled (Naturally, some historians believe that this was TruthInTelevision, judging from the chronicles of the time, while others suspect that the chroniclers themselves were exaggerating the atrocities, making the KillEmAll trope essentially the medieval equivalent to the modern EveryCarIsAPinto trope).



* KillEmAll: It's claimed that armies kill ''everyone'' when an enemy castle falls-even if it means [[TraumaticCSection tearing babies out of their mothers' wombs]]. As much as the team would like to save them all, stopping a massacre would have far-reaching consequences in the future.

to:

* KillEmAll: It's claimed that armies kill ''everyone'' when an enemy castle falls-even if it means [[TraumaticCSection tearing babies out of their mothers' wombs]]. As much as the team would like to save them all, stopping a massacre doing so would have far-reaching consequences in the future.



* ObligatoryWarCrimeScene: This is one of many works that presents a negative view of medieval warfare. One of the team even goes so far as to claim that when castles finally fell after sieges, ''everyone'' inside them was killed, and talks of pregnant women being disemboweled (Naturally, some historians believe that this was TruthInTelevision, judging from the chronicles of the time, while others suspect that the chroniclers themselves were exaggerating the atrocities, making this trope essentially the medieval equivalent to the modern EveryCarIsAPinto trope).

Changed: 1333

Removed: 881

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
There was no reason for removing that. Another example also was left with zero context. Some others talked to themselves, and I fixed that.


* BornInTheWrongCentury: André. [[spoiler: He later effectively rectifies the situation by choosing to stay behind.]]
** [[spoiler: Robert Deckard too, arguably.]]
* ChekhovsArmoury: Each researcher is introduced to us in certain scenes that make sense later. Also has elements of PlotTailoredToTheParty.
** {{Justified}}: the reason the protagonists are sent to the past is that they are experts on exactly that time period.

to:

* BornInTheWrongCentury: André. [[spoiler: He later effectively rectifies the situation by choosing to stay behind.]]
**
]] [[spoiler: Robert Deckard too, arguably.]]
* ChekhovsArmoury: Each researcher is introduced to us in certain scenes that make sense later. Also has elements of PlotTailoredToTheParty.
**
PlotTailoredToTheParty. {{Justified}}: the reason the protagonists are sent to the past is that they are experts on exactly that time period.



* CutLexLuthorACheck / ReedRichardsIsUseless: A lot of the technologies that had to be developed to make this time travel system work, like quantum computers that ran millions of calculations in parallel and down-to-the-atom body scanners, would have probably made more money than the actual plan ever could if they had just sold those.
** Justified in that Doniger didn't ''care'' about the money (he's already a billionaire), but rather the applications of the technology.
* DisguisedInDrag: [[spoiler:Kate]] and [[spoiler: no-one else]] because guards were looking for three foreigners; two males and one female. Guess what they did to fool them?
** Lady Claire also cross-dresses around the countryside.

to:

* CutLexLuthorACheck / ReedRichardsIsUseless: A lot of the technologies that had to be developed to make this time travel system work, like quantum computers that ran millions of calculations in parallel and down-to-the-atom body scanners, would have probably made more money than the actual plan ever could if they had just sold those.
** Justified
those. [[JustifiedTrope Justified]] in that Doniger didn't ''care'' about the money (he's already a billionaire), but rather the applications of the technology.
* DisguisedInDrag: [[spoiler:Kate]] and [[spoiler: no-one else]] because guards were looking for three foreigners; two males and one female. Guess what they did to fool them?
**
them. Lady Claire also cross-dresses around the countryside.



* DungAges: {{Subverted}} and mocked. The protagonist walks around, expecting horribly disgusting conditions, but is surprised to learn everyone is reasonably well kept. In the afterward, Crichton notes this was mostly an invention of the Renaissance, during which many scholars romanticized the Classical period above their own era. Personal hygiene declined significantly only once the Black Plague became epidemic (which started around the time the book is set), when the public baths that were common in most Medieval towns and cities became disease vectors. This made frequent bathing a hazard, and it was denounced as sinful, which became part of the culture, and monarchs after this like Isabella I of Spain boasted of only bathing a few times in their ''entire lives''. A servant insists that Chris is not clean enough after he washes himself, to his surprise, and scrubs him quite thoroughly.

to:

* DungAges: {{Subverted}} and mocked. The protagonist walks around, expecting horribly disgusting conditions, but is surprised to learn everyone is reasonably well kept. In the afterward, Crichton notes this was mostly an invention of the Renaissance, during which many scholars romanticized the Classical period above their own era. Personal hygiene declined significantly only once the Black Plague became epidemic (which started around the time the book is set), when the public baths that were common in most Medieval towns and cities became disease vectors. This made frequent bathing a hazard, and it was denounced as sinful, which became part of the culture, culture. Sanitation in most of Europe was already poor, though-people threw refuse right onto the streets. Unfortunately the cultural attitude went too far in the other direction, culture and monarchs after this like Isabella I of Spain boasted of only bathing a few times in their ''entire lives''. A servant insists that Chris is not clean enough after he washes himself, to his surprise, and scrubs him quite thoroughly.



* ForTheEvulz: Robert de Kere.

to:

* ForTheEvulz: Robert de Kere.Kere, who kills people out of simple enjoyment.



* UnreliableExpositor: The explanation for how time travel works (it's an alternate universe functionally identical to that time, not earlier in the same timeline) turns out to be simply wrong. [[spoiler:It is, in fact, time travel-just... odd.]]
** Justified in that the expositors in question, when pressed on several issues, admit that they ''don't really understand'' how the technology works... just that it does. [[TruthInTelevision This is not uncommon in quantum mechanics]]. One theory they seriously consider is that they're piggybacking on an ''alternate version'' of their project that ''does'' know how the technology works.

to:

* UnreliableExpositor: The explanation for how time travel works (it's an alternate universe functionally identical to that time, not earlier in the same timeline) turns out to be simply wrong. [[spoiler:It is, in fact, time travel-just... odd.]]
**
]] Justified in that the expositors in question, when pressed on several issues, admit that they ''don't really understand'' how the technology works... just that it does. [[TruthInTelevision This is not uncommon in quantum mechanics]]. One theory they seriously consider is that they're piggybacking on an ''alternate version'' of their project that ''does'' know how the technology works.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* DungAges: {{Subverted}} and mocked. The protagonist walks around, expecting horribly disgusting conditions, but is surprised to learn everyone is reasonably well kept. In the afterward, Crichton notes this was mostly an invention of the Renaissance, during which many scholars romanticized the Classical period above their own era. Personal hygiene declined significantly only once the Black Plague became epidemic (which started around the time the book is set), when the public baths that were common in most Medieval towns and cities became disease vectors. This made frequent bathing a hazard, and it was denounced as sinful, which became part of the culture. Sanitation in most of Europe was already poor, though-people threw refuse right onto the streets. Unfortunately the cultural attitude went too far in the other direction, and monarchs after this like Isabella I of Spain boasted of only bathing a few times in their ''entire lives''. A servant insists that Chris is not clean enough after he washes himself, to his surprise, and scrubs him quite thoroughly.

to:

* DungAges: {{Subverted}} and mocked. The protagonist walks around, expecting horribly disgusting conditions, but is surprised to learn everyone is reasonably well kept. In the afterward, Crichton notes this was mostly an invention of the Renaissance, during which many scholars romanticized the Classical period above their own era. Personal hygiene declined significantly only once the Black Plague became epidemic (which started around the time the book is set), when the public baths that were common in most Medieval towns and cities became disease vectors. This made frequent bathing a hazard, and it was denounced as sinful, which became part of the culture. Sanitation in most of Europe was already poor, though-people threw refuse right onto the streets. Unfortunately the cultural attitude went too far in the other direction, culture, and monarchs after this like Isabella I of Spain boasted of only bathing a few times in their ''entire lives''. A servant insists that Chris is not clean enough after he washes himself, to his surprise, and scrubs him quite thoroughly.



* ForTheEvulz: Robert de Kere. It's also stated that both French and English soldiers, when storming a castle, will massacre every civilian inside for kicks-and, as much as the team would like to save them all, stopping a massacre would have far-reaching consequences in the future.

to:

* ForTheEvulz: Robert de Kere. It's also stated that both French and English soldiers, when storming a castle, will massacre every civilian inside for kicks-and, as much as the team would like to save them all, stopping a massacre would have far-reaching consequences in the future.



* KillEmAll: It's claimed that armies kill ''everyone'' when an enemy castle falls-even if it means [[TraumaticCSection tearing babies out of their mothers' wombs]].

to:

* KillEmAll: It's claimed that armies kill ''everyone'' when an enemy castle falls-even if it means [[TraumaticCSection tearing babies out of their mothers' wombs]]. As much as the team would like to save them all, stopping a massacre would have far-reaching consequences in the future.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ObligatoryWarCrimeScene: This is one of many works that presents a negative view of medieval warfare. One of the team even goes so far as to claim that when castles finally fell after sieges, ''everyone'' inside them was killed, and talks of pregnant women being disemboweled (Naturally, some historians believe that this was TruthInTelevision, judging from the chronicles of the time, while others suspect that the chroniclers themselves were exaggerating the atrocities, deeming this trope as the medieval equivalent to the modern EveryCarIsAPinto trope).

to:

* ObligatoryWarCrimeScene: This is one of many works that presents a negative view of medieval warfare. One of the team even goes so far as to claim that when castles finally fell after sieges, ''everyone'' inside them was killed, and talks of pregnant women being disemboweled (Naturally, some historians believe that this was TruthInTelevision, judging from the chronicles of the time, while others suspect that the chroniclers themselves were exaggerating the atrocities, deeming making this trope as essentially the medieval equivalent to the modern EveryCarIsAPinto trope).

Added: 724

Removed: 438

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* HumansAreBastards: The horrible reality of medieval warfare is painted in full. One of the team plainly states that when castles finally fell after sieges, ''everyone'' inside them was massacred, and talks of pregnant women being disemboweled (TruthInTelevision, unfortunately).



* KillEmAll: It's claimed that armies kill ''everyone'' when an enemy castle falls-even if it means [[TraumaticCSection tearing babies out of their mothers' wombs]].



* ObligatoryWarCrimeScene: This is one of many works that presents a negative view of medieval warfare. One of the team even goes so far as to claim that when castles finally fell after sieges, ''everyone'' inside them was killed, and talks of pregnant women being disemboweled (Naturally, some historians believe that this was TruthInTelevision, judging from the chronicles of the time, while others suspect that the chroniclers themselves were exaggerating the atrocities, deeming this trope as the medieval equivalent to the modern EveryCarIsAPinto trope).



* WouldHurtAChild: It's explained that knights and soldiers kill ''everyone'' when a castle falls-even if it means tearing babies out of their mothers' wombs.

Added: 427

Changed: 114

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* DeliberateValuesDissonance: Despite its poor reception, the film has one of the most accurate depictions of medieval values in modern fiction.

to:

* DeliberateValuesDissonance: DeliberateValuesDissonance:
**
Despite its poor reception, the film has one of the most accurate depictions of medieval values in modern fiction.


Added DiffLines:

* FanOfThePast: Most of the main characters are historians of the medieval era. One of them is a lifelong enthusiast who's trained himself in period-era blacksmithing and swordplay. Early on in the film, he describes the life of a knight and concludes with the mildly {{narm}}y "The past is ''where it's at!"''

Added: 1154

Removed: 203

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* TooDumbToLive: The book version of Chris is pretty stupid, mostly not listening to André regarding anything for the first half. After which they're separated and he becomes marginally more intelligent.


Added DiffLines:

* TooDumbToLive: The book version of Chris is pretty stupid, mostly not listening to André regarding anything for the first half. After which they're separated and he becomes marginally more intelligent.
* TrappedInThePast: Happens to several charcters, for varying levels of "trapped." [[spoiler:Deckard]] has insinuated himself into the court of one of the warring nobles after being left behind, becoming [[spoiler:de Kere]]. [[spoiler:Marek]] ultimately chooses to stay behind voluntarily. Finally, [[spoiler: Doniger]] receives this treatment as a sort of temporal ThrownOutTheAirlock, being sent back to the midst of the Black Death epidemic.


Added DiffLines:

* TrappedInThePast: Several characters:
** The impetus for the group going back in the first place is the professor not having returned.
** Decker was previously left behind by Gordon, and has been forced to insinuate himself into Lord Oliver's graces.
** Marek voluntarily stays behind when the rest of the group returns to the present.
** Doniger effectively trades places with the group when they return, and explicitly states that he has no way of getting back. [[spoiler:He's killed almost instantly.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
The point is they treat him as suspicious just for being French, which makes no sense.


* ArtisticLicenseHistory: The film has the English treat a Frenchman as suspicious just for being French, and kill him as a spy. At the time however, most of the English nobles were themselves Norman-French, spoke French, and had French allies. The French and English did not wear red or blue uniforms at the time either. In that era there were no standard uniforms at all. If any, each lord's men wore his colors/emblem, not a national one. Of course, the scene overall establishes them as utterly loathsome assholes, [[spoiler:so killing Francois ForTheEvulz is still applicable.]]

to:

* ArtisticLicenseHistory: The film has the English treat a Frenchman as suspicious just for being French, and kill him as a spy. At the time however, most of the English nobles were themselves Norman-French, spoke French, and had French allies. The French and English did not wear red or blue uniforms at the time either. In that era there were no standard uniforms at all. If any, each lord's men wore his colors/emblem, not a national one. Of course, the scene overall establishes them as utterly loathsome assholes, [[spoiler:so killing Francois ForTheEvulz is still applicable.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ArtisticLicenseHistory: The film has the English treat a Frenchman as suspicious just for being French, and kill him as a spy. At the time however, most of the English nobles were themselves Norman-French, spoke French, and had French allies. The French and English did not wear red or blue uniforms at the time either. In that era there were no standard uniforms at all. If any, each lord's men wore his colors/emblem, not a national one.

to:

* ArtisticLicenseHistory: The film has the English treat a Frenchman as suspicious just for being French, and kill him as a spy. At the time however, most of the English nobles were themselves Norman-French, spoke French, and had French allies. The French and English did not wear red or blue uniforms at the time either. In that era there were no standard uniforms at all. If any, each lord's men wore his colors/emblem, not a national one. Of course, the scene overall establishes them as utterly loathsome assholes, [[spoiler:so killing Francois ForTheEvulz is still applicable.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* AwesomeButImpractical: Due to Doniger's marketing plan, which is using the time travel technology just to create [[spoiler: historically-accurate historical restorations]], instead of, you know, obtaining stock prices from the future. [[spoiler: It turns out this was a lie, and he planned to steal future technology.

to:

* AwesomeButImpractical: Due to Doniger's marketing plan, which is using the time travel technology just to create [[spoiler: historically-accurate historical restorations]], instead of, you know, obtaining stock prices from the future. [[spoiler: It turns out this was a lie, and he planned to steal future technology.]]

Changed: 85

Removed: 73

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* AwesomeButImpractical: Due to Doniger's marketing plan, which is using the time travel technology just to create [[spoiler: historically-accurate historical restorations]], instead of, you know, obtaining stock prices from the future.
** In the book this was a lie, and he planned to steal future technology.

to:

* AwesomeButImpractical: Due to Doniger's marketing plan, which is using the time travel technology just to create [[spoiler: historically-accurate historical restorations]], instead of, you know, obtaining stock prices from the future. \n** In the book [[spoiler: It turns out this was a lie, and he planned to steal future technology.



* ArtisticLicenseHistory: The film has the English treat a Frenchman as suspicious just for being French, and kill him as a spy. At the time however, most of the English nobles were themselves Norman-French, spoke French, and had French allies. The French and English did not wear red or blue uniforms at the time either. In that era there were no standards uniforms at all. If any, each lord's men wore his colors/emblem, not a national one.

to:

* ArtisticLicenseHistory: The film has the English treat a Frenchman as suspicious just for being French, and kill him as a spy. At the time however, most of the English nobles were themselves Norman-French, spoke French, and had French allies. The French and English did not wear red or blue uniforms at the time either. In that era there were no standards standard uniforms at all. If any, each lord's men wore his colors/emblem, not a national one.



* CompositeCharacter: Steve Kramer combines the roles of the book's Diane Kramer and John Gordon, who are both high ranking corporate officers in ITC who later [[spoiler:turn on Doniger]]. William [=DeKere=]'s role also includes elements from another of Oliver's lieutenants in the book, Guy de Malegant.

to:

* CompositeCharacter: Steve Kramer combines the roles of the book's Diane Kramer and John Gordon, who are both high ranking high-ranking corporate officers in ITC who later [[spoiler:turn on Doniger]]. William [=DeKere=]'s role also includes elements from another of Oliver's lieutenants in the book, Guy de Malegant.



** It's rather well summed up in the scene where the main party is escaping and the Scotsman standing a few feet from the guard, with an arrow pointed at his chest says something to the effect of "Stay quiet if you value your life." The guard picks up his sword and yells "Traitors!" running at him. Before promptly being shot in the chest.

to:

** It's rather well summed up in the scene where the main party is escaping and the Scotsman standing a few feet from the guard, with an arrow pointed at his chest says something to the effect of "Stay quiet if you value your life." The guard picks up his sword and yells "Traitors!" "Traitors!", running at him. Before promptly being shot in the chest.



** François himself as well. [[spoiler: He translates the phrase as "I am a spy". Not, say, "You've asked me to translate 'I am a spy' M'lord." or "The phrase you said means you are referring to yourself as a spy, M'lord" or basically any other phrase that would work as a verbal loophole rather than a confession. Not that it would likely have helped him...]]

to:

** François himself as well. [[spoiler: He translates the phrase as "I am a spy". Not, say, "You've asked me to translate 'I am a spy' M'lord." or "The phrase you said means you are referring to yourself as a spy, M'lord" M'lord." or basically any other phrase that would work as a verbal loophole rather than a confession. Not that it would likely have helped him...]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


A film adaptation was released in 2003 directed by Creator/RichardDonner and starring Creator/PaulWalker, Creator/GerardButler, Frances O'Connor, Creator/BillyConnolly, Creator/MartonCsokas, Creator/AnnaFriel and David Thewlis, among others.

to:

A film adaptation was released in 2003 directed by Creator/RichardDonner and starring Creator/PaulWalker, Creator/GerardButler, Frances O'Connor, Creator/BillyConnolly, Creator/MartonCsokas, Creator/AnnaFriel and David Thewlis, Creator/DavidThewlis, among others.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ArtisticLicenseHistory: The film has the English treat a Frenchman as suspicious just for being French, and kill him as a spy. At the time however, most of the English nobles were themselves Norman-French, spoke French, and had French allies. The French and English did not wear red or blue uniforms at the time either. At the time there were no standards uniforms at all. If any, each lord's men wore his colors/emblem, not a national one.

to:

* ArtisticLicenseHistory: The film has the English treat a Frenchman as suspicious just for being French, and kill him as a spy. At the time however, most of the English nobles were themselves Norman-French, spoke French, and had French allies. The French and English did not wear red or blue uniforms at the time either. At the time In that era there were no standards uniforms at all. If any, each lord's men wore his colors/emblem, not a national one.

Top