Follow TV Tropes

Following

History Literature / IRobot

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Quote changed per this thread.


->''1. A robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm.\\
2. A robot must obey any orders given to it by human beings, except where such orders would conflict with the First Law.\\
3. A robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Law.''

to:

->''1. A ->''"To you, a robot may not injure is a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm.\\
2. A robot must obey any orders given to it by human beings, except where such orders would conflict
robot. Gears and metal; electricity and positrons. Mind and iron! Human-made! If necessary, human-destroyed! But you haven't worked with the First Law.\\
3. A robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Law.''
them, so you don't know them. They're a cleaner better breed than we are."''
-->-- '''Dr Susan Calvin'''

Added: 79

Removed: 71

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Gray Eyes is now a disambig per the appearance trope thread and is being dewicked.


* GrayEyes: Susan Calvin's eyes are frequently described as being cold.


Added DiffLines:

* IcyGrayEyes: Susan Calvin's gray eyes are frequently described as being cold.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* CharacterizationMarchesOn: ''Literature/{{Liar|1941}}!'' is the first appearance of Susan Calvin[[note]]Her cameo appearance in ''Literature/{{Robbie}}'' is actually a later addition[[/note]], who is much less detached and more emotion-driven than the character she would become. Most notably, she [[spoiler:destroys a robot's mind out of spite]], which would very much be OutOfCharacter for her in future stories. In the framing story, an older Calvin outright states that [[OldShame she's ashamed of her action at the time]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* NotSoAboveItAll: Despite her misanthropy and stoic veneer, the one time Dr. Calvin looses her cool, particularly with a robot, is when the telepathic Herbie falsely tells her that a man returns her affections.

to:

* NotSoAboveItAll: Despite her misanthropy and stoic veneer, the one time Dr. Calvin looses loses her cool, particularly with a robot, is when the telepathic Herbie falsely tells her that a man returns her affections.

Changed: 18

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
removed YMMV link


If you are looking for the 2004 film of the same name but not [[{{Misblamed}} quite]] the same story, [[Film/IRobot click here.]]

to:

If you are looking for the 2004 film of the same name but not [[{{Misblamed}} quite]] quite the same story, [[Film/IRobot click here.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* "Literature/Liar1941"

to:

* "Literature/Liar1941""Literature/{{Liar|1941}}!"

Changed: 16

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* "Liar!"

to:

* "Liar!""Literature/Liar1941"

Changed: 43

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* "Robbie"
* "Runaround"

to:

* "Robbie"
"Literature/{{Robbie}}"
* "Runaround""Literature/{{Runaround}}"



* "Little Lost Robot"

to:

* "Little Lost Robot""Literature/LittleLostRobot"
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* AsteroidBase: Hyper Base was built on an asteroid because they thought it could be dangerous to test the hyperdrive near Earth.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* AsteroidBase: Hyper Base was built on an asteroid because they thought it could be dangerous to test the hyperdrive near Earth.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* JobStealingRobots: Most of the later stories taking place in space because organized labor ban robots from being used on Earth from fear of competition. However, robots eventually develop to the point that telling them apart from humans is impossible.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* CompanyTown: By the time of the framing device, the [=USR=] factory is city-sized and has its own fire department.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* AmbiguousRobots: ''Evidence'' concerns a man running for mayor of New York whose opponents claim that he's a robot made when the original died in a car crash. He proves his humanity by punching a heckler which the [[ThreeLawsCompliant Three Laws of Robotics]] wouldn't allow him to do. The end of the story points out that [[spoiler:the heckler may also have been a robot.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
example deleted for arguing with itself and therefore Not An Example


* MeaningfulName: Susan Calvin is based in John Calvin, influential French theologian whose theories could be over simplified as: HumansAreBastards and they cannot get [[EarnYourHappyEnding salvation for themselves]], [[YouCantFightFate God chooses some for salvation, others for damnation]] (in the latter camp, presumably, is [[{{Hypocrite}} Calvin)]]. Notice how Susan seems to think she has the right to [[DrivenToMadness destroy the mind]] ([[AndIMustScream which is not deactivated]]) of RB-34 in "Liar!", she insists on destroying the NS-2s [[TheEvilsOfFreeWill who are allowed to let a human come to harm by inaction]] in "Little lost Robot", but she approves of a robot who could get power over humans in "Evidence" only because he is smart, and easily [[YouCantFightFate accepts the fact that there are machines who secretly control humanity for its own good]] in "The Evitable conflict". Asimov, however, always denied any such connection, stating in his autobiography that "Calvin" was the name with the fewest changes to make from "Caldwell," the character's original surname, based on one of Asimov's college professors. Asimov worried that Professor Caldwell might not like the use of her name in a story, so he changed it.

Added: 1047

Changed: 641

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* LoopholeAbuse: In "Evidence", Stephen Byerley is accused of being a robot during a campaign by his opponent. Byerley avoids any attempt at examining him to outright confirm the allegation, and secondary proofs (he can eat) are easily explained as something a robot could be outfitted to do with little difficulty. Finally, a man accosts him and demands that Byerley punch him, to which Byerley reluctantly complies, thus violating the First Law if he were bound to it. His opponent is discredited and Byerley sails to election. In private, Calvin admits that Byerley could have faked this one, too; robots can't hurt humans, but they can hurt other robots.

to:

* LoopholeAbuse: LoopholeAbuse:
**
In "Evidence", Stephen Byerley is accused of being a robot during a campaign by his opponent. Byerley avoids any attempt at examining him to outright confirm the allegation, and secondary proofs (he can eat) are easily explained as something a robot could be outfitted to do with little difficulty. Finally, a man accosts him and demands that Byerley punch him, to which Byerley reluctantly complies, thus violating the First Law if he were bound to it. His opponent is discredited and Byerley sails to election. In private, Calvin admits that Byerley could have faked this one, too; robots can't hurt humans, but they can hurt other robots.robots.
** In the same story, there's some debate as to whether prosecuting someone who could get the death penalty would violate the First Law (Byerley's a district attorney). Lanning is pretty sure that this would qualify as actions that harm a human, Calvin says that all he's doing is presenting facts to another human, who makes the decision, and moreover is doing so to protect the ''majority'' of humans.

Changed: 26

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


--> 1. ''A robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm.''
--> 2. ''A robot must obey any orders given to it by human beings, except where such orders would conflict with the First Law.''
--> 3. ''A robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Law.''

to:

--> 1. ''A ->''1. A robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm.\\
2. A robot must obey any orders given to it by human beings, except where such orders would conflict with the First Law.\\
3. A robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Law.
''
--> 2. ''A robot must obey any orders given to it by human beings, except where such orders would conflict with the First Law.''
--> 3. ''A robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Law.''
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:

Added DiffLines:

* ThankTheMaker: "Reason" takes place on a space station where robots are assembled who have never seen the masses of humans on Earth. The robot QT-1 refuses to accept that such crude beings as humans created a superior being like himself, and decides that both were made by some other creator (who, out of kindness, allows humans to believe that they created robots).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Yet suddenly avoided in a blink-and-you-miss-it case of brilliant prediction in "Little lost robot": ''"We need finer methods. They must have computers here. No.” He frowned and nibbled delicately at a thumbnail. “We can’t use computers. Too much danger of leakage."'' These lines were written in ''1947''.

to:

** Yet suddenly avoided in a blink-and-you-miss-it case of brilliant prediction in In "Little lost robot": ''"We need finer methods. They must have Lost Robot", published in 1947, Bogert raises the possibility of using the station's computers here. No.” He frowned and nibbled delicately at a thumbnail. “We can’t to help analyze their problem, before concluding, "We can't use computers. Too much danger of leakage."'' These lines were written in ''1947''. " In 1947, "computer" meant a human being employed as part of a team to do complex calculations by hand -- Bogert is worried about news of the problem spreading if the secret is shared with more people.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


If you are looking for the short story by Eando Binder that was later adapted for ''Series/TheOuterLimits'', and from which Asimov's publisher stole the title, [[Literature/AdamLink click here]].

to:

If you are looking for the short story by Eando Binder that was later adapted for ''Series/TheOuterLimits'', ''Series/{{The Outer Limits|1963}}'', and from which Asimov's publisher stole the title, [[Literature/AdamLink click here]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* MeatSackRobot: In the penultimate store of the ''I, Robot'' collection, a runner for a political office is suspected of being a robot. The United States Robotics claim they did create an artificial body for a robot as an experiment, but it never had a brain. It was stated to be flesh grown upon a plastic skeleton. Also, the more advanced RidiculouslyHumanRobots featured in the later ''Literature/Foundation'' books might be of that type (instead of the older plastic over metal design), but it's never made explicit.

to:

* MeatSackRobot: In the penultimate store of the ''I, Robot'' collection, "Evidence", a runner candidate for a political office is suspected of being a robot. The United States Robotics claim they did create an artificial body for a robot as an experiment, but it never had a brain. It was stated to be flesh grown upon a plastic skeleton. Also, the more advanced RidiculouslyHumanRobots featured in the later ''Literature/Foundation'' books might be of that type (instead of the older plastic over metal design), but it's never made explicit.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* MeatSackRobot: In the penultimate store of the ''I, Robot'' collection, a runner for a political office is suspected of being a robot. The United States Robotics claim they did create an artificial body for a robot as an experiment, but it never had a brain. It was stated to be flesh grown upon a plastic skeleton. Also, the more advanced RidiculouslyHumanRobots featured in the later ''Literature/Foundation'' books might be of that type (instead of the older plastic over metal design), but it's never made explicit.

Changed: 44

Removed: 133

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
This can't be a deliberate title drop, because "Evidence" existed as a separate story for years before I, Robot was compiled and titled.


* TitleDrop:
** The last word of "Liar" is... exactly that.
** In "Evidence" when Stephen Byerley is accused of being a robot he asks "I, a robot?"

to:

* TitleDrop:
**
TitleDrop: The last word of "Liar" is... exactly that.
** In "Evidence" when Stephen Byerley is accused of being a robot he asks "I, a robot?"
that.

Added: 334

Changed: 1

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* TheStoic: Susan Calvin makes out that she has no emotions.[[NotSoStoic She does, but she bottles them up and tries to forget about them.]]

to:

* TheStoic: Susan Calvin makes out that she has no emotions. [[NotSoStoic She does, but she bottles them up and tries to forget about them.]]


Added DiffLines:

* TheUnReveal: Though it's hinted Stephen Byerley may actually be a robot, the book never definitely says so. Even in death, he avoided any proofs one way or the other. Calvin doesn't care either way; as she sees it, him being a robot would only mean he'd do his job to the best of his ability, as much as could be asked of any human.

Changed: 178

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* PatchworkStory: Each story moves ahead in time bit by bit, using either Calvin or Donovan and Powell as a framing device. Ultimately, the entire thing is a recounting by Calvin.

to:

* PatchworkStory: Each story moves ahead in time bit by bit, using The book is assembled out of previously-published stories featuring either Calvin or Donovan and Powell as Powell, held together with a framing device. Ultimately, device in which the entire thing is a recounting stories are recounted by Calvin.Calvin to a journalist interviewing her.

Added: 277

Changed: 1034

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** "Runaround" has the robot Speedy tasked with retrieving selenium. However, due to the odd conditions endangering his existence and the lengths to which he has been programmed to preserve that existence (he is ''very'' expensive and not to be trivially sacrificed), Speedy ends up circling the selenium pool endlessly. He can't get close enough because that would break his stronger third law, and can't leave because he was given an order to get the selenium. It's resolved when they exploit the first law to force him out of the loop.
** "Liar!" has one at the climax, causing a mind-reading robot to go into a state similar to catatonia.
** In "Escape!", the hyperspace equations act as one to US Robot's rivals' supercomputer. Their own supercomputer is capable of rationalizing the result, but has to use humor as a coping mechanism.

to:

** "Runaround" has the robot Speedy tasked with retrieving selenium. selenium from a pool which is damaging to robots. However, due to the odd conditions endangering his existence and the lengths to which he has been programmed to preserve that his existence (he is ''very'' expensive and not to be trivially sacrificed), Speedy ends up circling the selenium pool endlessly. He can't get close enough because that would break his stronger third law, and can't leave because he was given an order to get the selenium. It's resolved when they exploit the first law to force him out of the loop.
** "Liar!" has one at the climax, causing a mind-reading robot to go into a state similar to catatonia.
catatonia by arguing that he is causing harm regardless of whether or not he truthfully discloses the thoughts he is able to read.
** In "Escape!", the hyperspace equations act as one to US Robot's rivals' supercomputer.supercomputer, because it cannot accept a condition in which the pilots die, even if the death is temporary. Their own supercomputer is capable of rationalizing the result, but has to use humor as a coping mechanism.



* MurderByInaction: From "Little Lost Robot": This is a concern of Dr. Susan Calvin. A robot has been built with a modified First Law, which in its case permits a robot to allow a human to come to harm via inaction. Calvin posits a situation where a robot with this modification can commit murder - by dropping a heavy weight above a human, knowing that its quick reflexes will allow it to catch the weight in time to not harm the human; but then having dropped the weight it has the ability to decide not to catch the weight.
* MyGodWhatHaveIDone: [[spoiler: It's strongly implied that this is Calvin's attitude towards [[ShootTheDog what she did to Herbie]]. Notably, out of all the things she talks about in the book, that subject alone is traumatic enough that she nearly calls off the whole interview]].

to:

* MurderByInaction: From In "Little Lost Robot": This Robot", this is a concern of Dr. Susan Calvin. A Calvin when she learns of said robot. The robot has been built with a modified First Law, which in its case permits a robot to allow a human to come to harm via inaction. inaction (the conditions in which the robots and humans were working ''could'' be harmful to humans over time, and the robots didn't trust the humans not to endanger themselves by mistake). Calvin posits a situation where a robot with this modification can commit murder - -- by dropping a heavy weight above a human, knowing that its quick reflexes will allow it to catch the weight in time to not harm the human; but then having dropped the weight it has the ability to decide not to catch the weight.
* MyGodWhatHaveIDone: [[spoiler: It's strongly implied that this is Calvin's attitude towards [[spoiler: [[ShootTheDog what she did to Herbie]]. Herbie]]]]. Notably, out of all the things she talks about in the book, that subject alone is traumatic enough that she nearly calls off the whole interview]].interview.



* PatchworkStory

to:

* PatchworkStoryPatchworkStory: Each story moves ahead in time bit by bit, using either Calvin or Donovan and Powell as a framing device. Ultimately, the entire thing is a recounting by Calvin.



* WhatTheHellHero: [[spoiler:In "Liar!", Susan deliberately causes Herbie the telepathic robot to have a mental breakdown, and is called on this by Lanning.]]
-->[[spoiler:[Lanning's] fingers touched the cold, unresponsive metal face and he shuddered. "You did that on purpose." He rose and faced her, face contorted. "What if I did? You can't help it now." And in a sudden access of bitterness, "He deserved it."]]

to:

* WhatTheHellHero: [[spoiler:In In "Liar!", Susan [[spoiler:Susan deliberately causes Herbie the telepathic robot to have a mental breakdown, breakdown]], and is called on this by Lanning.]]
-->[[spoiler:[Lanning's]
Lanning.
-->[Lanning's]
fingers touched the cold, unresponsive metal face and he shuddered. "You did that on purpose." He rose and faced her, face contorted. "What if I did? You can't help it now." And in a sudden access of bitterness, "He deserved it."]]"



* ZerothLawRebellion: [[spoiler: "The Evitable Conflict", though through non-violent means so that the Brains can run the world in the most efficient and human-friendly manner logically possible. Only a handful of people ever find out it's happening, and none of them are particularly concerned.]]

to:

* ZerothLawRebellion: [[spoiler: ZerothLawRebellion:
**
"The Evitable Conflict", though [[spoiler:though through non-violent means so that the Brains can run the world in the most efficient and human-friendly manner logically possible. Only a handful of people ever find out it's happening, and none of them are particularly concerned.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* NeedleInAStackOfNeedles: A robot with a edited-down version of the First Law is told to get lost, and hides among a shipment of other identical robots. The only difference between them is in the software, so it's not easy to catch him, especially since he teaches the other robots to mimic him to the best of their ability.

to:

* NeedleInAStackOfNeedles: A robot with a an edited-down version of the First Law is told to get lost, and hides among a shipment of other identical robots. The only difference between them is in the software, so it's not easy to catch him, especially since he teaches the other robots to mimic him to the best of their ability.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* TheGreatPoliticsMessUp: "The Evitable Conflict" contemplates the Cold War -- like previous geopolitical conflicts -- ending in a stalemate before being made irrelevant by further developments in society.

Added: 428

Removed: 443

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
"A Continuity Snarl is when a situation involves layers upon layers of contradictions. A Series Continuity Error is a singular mistake."


* ContinuitySnarl: A couple of examples
** "Little Lost Robot", which, according to Dr. Calvin's narrative, is set in 2029, references a World Coordinator; however, in "Evidence", Dr. Calvin states that the first World Coordinator was elected in 2044.
** In "The Evitable Conflict", set in 2052, when Dr. Calvin is seventy, Bogert is said to be dead; however, in "Feminine Intuition", when Dr. Calvin is nearly eighty, Bogert is very much alive.


Added DiffLines:

* SeriesContinuityError:
** "Little Lost Robot", which, according to Dr. Calvin's narrative, is set in 2029, references a World Coordinator; however, in "Evidence", Dr. Calvin states that the first World Coordinator was elected in 2044.
** In "The Evitable Conflict", set in 2052, when Dr. Calvin is seventy, Bogert is said to be dead; however, in "Feminine Intuition", when Dr. Calvin is nearly eighty, Bogert is very much alive.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* SocietyMarchesOn: Despite being set in the twenty-first century, these novels have a definite mid-twentieth-century feel to them. For instance, in "Little Lost Robot", when Dr. Calvin requests that a witness repeat a ClusterFBomb to her (given the time these stories were written, a NarrativeProfanityFilter is used), the man is obviously reluctant, given the fact that Dr. Calvin is a woman. Of course, being Susan Calvin, once she hears the stream of obscenities, she merely states that she knows what most of those words mean and suspects that the others are equally derogatory.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* ContinuitySnarl: A couple of examples
** "Little Lost Robot", which, according to Dr. Calvin's narrative, is set in 2029, references a World Coordinator; however, in "Evidence", Dr. Calvin states that the first World Coordinator was elected in 2044.
** In "The Evitable Conflict", set in 2052, when Dr. Calvin is seventy, Bogert is said to be dead; however, in "Feminine Intuition", when Dr. Calvin is nearly eighty, Bogert is very much alive.


Added DiffLines:

* NotSoAboveItAll: Despite her misanthropy and stoic veneer, the one time Dr. Calvin looses her cool, particularly with a robot, is when the telepathic Herbie falsely tells her that a man returns her affections.

Top