History Literature / ACivilAction

20th Nov '16 8:18:33 AM mavacca
Is there an issue? Send a Message


** In the film, when the law firm representing Beatrice Foods receives Jan's notice of claim, the senior partner instructs an intern to bring it to Jerome Facher immediately. After searching for him everywhere, the intern locates him in a remote corner of the library of the firm eating his lunch and listening to the radio report of a baseball game. At first Facher addresses the young man friendly, but the conversation quickly turns into an angry dress-down of the poor guy for having disturbed Facher during his only treasured moment in the day free from work. This scene not only establishes that Facher is a respected litigator to whom the most delicate cases are referred, but also shows that his friendly and eccentric behavior hides a ruthless bastard and, by extension, an opponent who should not be underestimated. [[spoiler:Unfortunately, this is what Jan does.]]

to:

** In the film, when the law firm representing Beatrice Foods receives Jan's notice of claim, the senior partner instructs partners instruct an intern to bring it to Jerome Facher immediately. After searching for him everywhere, the intern locates him in a remote corner of the library of the firm eating his lunch and listening to the radio report of a baseball game. At first Facher addresses the young man friendly, but the conversation quickly turns into an angry dress-down of the poor guy for having disturbed Facher during his only treasured moment in the day free from work. This scene not only establishes that Facher is a respected litigator to whom the most delicate cases are referred, but also shows that his friendly and eccentric behavior hides a ruthless bastard and, by extension, an opponent who should not be underestimated. [[spoiler:Unfortunately, this is what Jan does.]]
20th Nov '16 8:16:52 AM mavacca
Is there an issue? Send a Message


* AmoralAttorney: Jerome Facher.

to:

* AmoralAttorney: Jerome Facher.A main theme of the film is that amorality is a necessary quality of successful lawyers, because their job is to give to their clients the best advice possible on the basis of the objective circumstances and the law and becoming too involved in their clientsí personal tragedies may cloud their judgment and make them less effective. This is played straight during the trial: the most amoral and competent attorney wins [[spoiler: even if his client is guilty]]. Eventually subverted with Jan, who proudly states that at the end he has no regrets, since taking the Woburn case has made him a better man.
24th Jul '16 4:59:22 AM mavacca
Is there an issue? Send a Message

Added DiffLines:

** At the beginning of the movie John Travolta plays Jan Schlichtmann as a huge self-centered {{jerkass}}, who cares only about himself and even goes so far to say that the only good thing about the Woburn case is the ďtheatrical valueĒ of eight dead kids (thatís before discovering that the case is against two deep-pockets defendants, of course). He only [[HeelFaceTurn becomes more sympathetic]], as he becomes more involved with the suffering of the families he is representing. The real Schlichtmann was [[CrusadingLawyer much more idealistic]]: he decided to pursue a career in law only after having watched [[RichardNixon the Watergate hearings]] and having discovered through his work for the American Civil Liberties Union that the legal system could be used to defend the powerless and the weak. He even waived the chance of working for one of the best law firms of the nation because the partner interviewing him questioned his work on behalf of the minorities and the poor.
** In the movie the Woburn case is selected by Kevin Conway (one of Janís associates, played by Actor/TonyShalhoub) and Jan is vehemently against accepting it, considering it a useless waste of time and money. In {{real life}}, the Woburn case was Janís pet project while he was trying to build his legal practice and it was the careful Conway who insisted that he let it go, [[TheCassandra correctly assessing that it would be a very difficult case to prove and it could become way more expensive than the firm could afford]].
23rd Jul '16 4:58:11 AM mavacca
Is there an issue? Send a Message


* BunnyEarsLawyer: Jerome Facher is a literal one. His behaviour is, to say the least, unusual for a lawyer. He is a huge baseball fan, to the point of playing with a ball during conference calls with a co-defendant's attorney in a serious case. He always uses an old briefcase, with

to:

* BunnyEarsLawyer: Jerome Facher is a literal one. His behaviour is, to say the least, unusual for a lawyer. lawyer, to the point that he sometimes seems an old oddball. He is a huge baseball fan, to the point of playing with a ball during a conference calls call with a co-defendant's attorney in a serious case. He always uses an old briefcase, with a cartoon character sticker on it, which keeps breaking up and that he keeps repairing with huge amounts of duct tape, even in the courtroom during an hearing. But he is very well versed in civil procedure law and he is a skilled and experienced litigator and [[TheChessmaster a cunning strategist]], the kind of lawyer every sensible defendant would like to have on his side during a complicated lawsuit.
23rd Jul '16 4:43:11 AM mavacca
Is there an issue? Send a Message


* BunnyEarsLawyer: Jerome Facher is a literal one. His behaviour is, to say the least, unusual for a lawyer. He is a huge baseball fan, to the point of playing with a ball during conference calls with a co-defendant's attorney in a serious case. He always uses an old briefcase, with



* CommonNonsenseJury: [[spoiler: Averted. The case against Beatrice is dismissed, but it is mainly because Jan did not have the evidence to support it.]]

to:

* CommonNonsenseJury: [[spoiler: Averted.[[InvokedTrope Invoked]] by Jan during his chat with Facher in the hallway of the Courthouse while they are waiting for the Jury's verdict. Ultimately averted. The case against Beatrice is dismissed, but it is mainly because Jan did not have the evidence to support it.]]



* TheJudge: Walter Jay Skinner, whose management of the case was controversial. In the film, he is clearly unimpressed (and sometimes he is outright exasperated) by Jan's antics.

to:

* TheJudge: Walter Jay Skinner, whose management of the case was controversial. In the film, he is clearly unimpressed (and sometimes he is outright exasperated) by Jan's antics.{{courtroom antics}}.
20th Jul '16 10:12:12 PM mavacca
Is there an issue? Send a Message


* ObfuscatingStupidity: If you are a lawyer representing a plaintiff and the defendant is represented by Jerome Facher, DO NOT be fooled by his dismissive behaviour and by its eccentricities.

to:

* ObfuscatingStupidity: If you are a lawyer representing a plaintiff and the defendant is represented by Jerome Facher, DO NOT be fooled by his dismissive behaviour and by its his eccentricities.
20th Jul '16 3:14:03 PM mavacca
Is there an issue? Send a Message


* DavidVersusGoliath: This film is the story of a small law firm specialized in personal injury law representing six middle-class families in a civil action against two mega-corporations and their first-rate lawyers, so this trope is invoked almost since the beginning. This is even lampashaded in Janís v.o. monologue below. [[spoiler:Ultimately, this trope is cruelly subverted, in that Janís firm is conducted on the verge of bankruptcy, one corporation (apparently) gets out scot-free and the other settles the case for next to nothing, compared to its huge profits. Remarkably, Jan loses not only because his opponents are richer and more powerful, but also because their lawyers (or, at least, one of them) are better.]]

to:

* DavidVersusGoliath: This film is the story of a small law firm specialized in personal injury law representing six eight middle-class families in a civil action against two mega-corporations and their first-rate lawyers, so this trope is invoked almost since the beginning. This is even lampashaded in Janís v.o. monologue below. [[spoiler:Ultimately, this trope is cruelly subverted, in that Janís firm is conducted on the verge of bankruptcy, one corporation (apparently) gets out scot-free and the other settles the case for next to nothing, compared to its huge profits. Remarkably, Jan loses not only because his opponents are richer and more powerful, but also because their lawyers (or, at least, one of them) are better.]]
20th Jul '16 2:35:24 PM mavacca
Is there an issue? Send a Message

Added DiffLines:

* ObfuscatingStupidity: If you are a lawyer representing a plaintiff and the defendant is represented by Jerome Facher, DO NOT be fooled by his dismissive behaviour and by its eccentricities.
20th Jul '16 2:27:39 PM mavacca
Is there an issue? Send a Message

Added DiffLines:

* DavidVersusGoliath: This film is the story of a small law firm specialized in personal injury law representing six middle-class families in a civil action against two mega-corporations and their first-rate lawyers, so this trope is invoked almost since the beginning. This is even lampashaded in Janís v.o. monologue below. [[spoiler:Ultimately, this trope is cruelly subverted, in that Janís firm is conducted on the verge of bankruptcy, one corporation (apparently) gets out scot-free and the other settles the case for next to nothing, compared to its huge profits. Remarkably, Jan loses not only because his opponents are richer and more powerful, but also because their lawyers (or, at least, one of them) are better.]]
-->'''Jan Schlichtmann [v.o.]:''' When you are a small firm and they are a big one, steeped in history and wealth, like they always are, with their Persian carpets on the floor and their Harvard diplomas hanging on the walls, itís easy to be intimidated. Donít. Thatís what they want. Thatís what they expect, like all bullies. Thatís how they win. I donít run away from bullies.
19th Jul '16 4:52:45 AM mavacca
Is there an issue? Send a Message

Added DiffLines:

* CommonNonsenseJury: [[spoiler: Averted. The case against Beatrice is dismissed, but it is mainly because Jan did not have the evidence to support it.]]
This list shows the last 10 events of 36. Show all.
http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/article_history.php?article=Literature.ACivilAction