5th Apr '14 1:40:31 AM Sammettik
Send Sammettik a standard message explaining an editing issue.
Way too skimpy an example. Needs more detail.
1st Apr '14 9:42:51 PM Lequinni
Send Lequinni a standard message explaining an editing issue.
to:
30th Mar '14 8:20:09 PM RPRPsych
Send RPRPsych a standard message explaining an editing issue.
13th Mar '14 1:33:59 PM MarkLungo
Send MarkLungo a standard message explaining an editing issue.
to:
8th Mar '14 2:23:26 PM InTheGallbladder
Send InTheGallbladder a standard message explaining an editing issue.
Yea, the whole thing's cringe inducing and I side with every word written, but even going by its pages on-site, it seems to have a completely sincere following, which is an instant DQ.
4th Mar '14 11:56:32 AM supergod
Send supergod a standard message explaining an editing issue.
to:
4th Mar '14 11:49:44 AM supergod
Send supergod a standard message explaining an editing issue.
I looked through the history and found an explanation that was cut.
to:
4th Mar '14 11:39:10 AM supergod
Send supergod a standard message explaining an editing issue.
I don't think the science complaint is necessary in a fantasy novel, especially for something that was probably done for Rule Of Cool. Also removing the Hollywood Science pothole from the Foyt novel, since it's not explained.
to:
to:
4th Mar '14 10:11:55 AM Firechick12012
Send Firechick12012 a standard message explaining an editing issue.
to:
10th Feb '14 11:17:37 AM LahmacunKebab
Send LahmacunKebab a standard message explaining an editing issue.
to:
This list shows the last 10 events of 464. Show all.
TV Tropes by TV Tropes Foundation, LLC is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.
Permissions beyond the scope of this license may be available from thestaff@tvtropes.org.
Privacy Policy