History Horrible / Film

8th Sep '16 4:51:11 PM OnGreenDolphinStreet
Is there an issue? Send a Message


'''''Important Note:''''' Merely being offensive in its subject matter, a BoxOfficeBomb, or a film you don't plain like [[RuleOfCautiousEditingJudgement is not sufficient.]] Hard as it is to imagine at times, [[FetishFuel there is a market for all types of deviancy]], no matter how small a niche it is. It has to ''fail to appeal even to that niche'' to qualify as this. (If you're unsure whether it belongs here or not, visit the [[http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/remarks.php?trope=Horrible.Film discussion page]] and give us your input. Otherwise, if it's something you just plain don't like, please don't shoehorn it in, this isn't a page for complaining about things that fail to you.)

'''''Second Important Note:''''' It isn't a Horrible film just because anyone from Website/ThatGuyWithTheGlasses and/or any other CausticCritic reviewed it, or because it was on ''Series/MysteryScienceTheater3000''. Nor is it a Horrible film just because it earned a Razzie nomination/award for "Worst Picture." There needs to be independent evidence, such as reputable critics like Creator/RogerEbert and Creator/LeonardMaltin (emphasis on plural), for example, to list it. Once it is listed, they can provide the detailed review. Website/RottenTomatoes and Metacritic are good starting points to find those critics; if the rating on RT is in the single-digits and/or the Metascore below 30, it's a potential candidate for this list. In other words, universally despised by audience and critics alike.

to:

'''''Important Note:''''' Notes:'''''

#
Merely being offensive in its subject matter, a BoxOfficeBomb, or a film you don't plain like [[RuleOfCautiousEditingJudgement is not sufficient.]] Hard as it is to imagine at times, [[FetishFuel there is a market for all types of deviancy]], no matter how small a niche it is. It has to ''fail to appeal even to that niche'' to qualify as this. (If you're unsure whether it belongs here or not, visit the [[http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/remarks.php?trope=Horrible.Film discussion page]] and give us your input. Otherwise, if it's something you just plain don't like, please don't shoehorn it in, this isn't a page for complaining about things that fail to you.)

'''''Second Important Note:''''' # It isn't a Horrible film just because anyone from Website/ThatGuyWithTheGlasses and/or any other CausticCritic reviewed it, or because it was on ''Series/MysteryScienceTheater3000''. Nor is it a Horrible film just because it earned a Razzie nomination/award for "Worst Picture." There needs to be independent evidence, such as reputable critics like Creator/RogerEbert and Creator/LeonardMaltin (emphasis on plural), for example, to list it. Once it is listed, they can provide the detailed review. Website/RottenTomatoes and Metacritic are good starting points to find those critics; if the rating on RT is in the single-digits and/or the Metascore below 30, it's a potential candidate for this list. In other words, universally despised by audience and critics alike.alike.
11th Jul '16 3:48:55 PM lledsmar
Is there an issue? Send a Message


'''''Second Important Note:''''' It isn't a Horrible film just because anyone from Website/ThatGuyWithTheGlasses and/or any other CausticCritic reviewed it, or because it was on ''Series/MysteryScienceTheater3000''. Nor is it a Horrible film just because it earned a Razzie nomination/award for "Worst Picture." There needs to be independent evidence, such as reputable critics like Creator/RogerEbert and Creator/LeonardMaltin (emphasis on plural), for example, to list it. Once it is listed, they can provide the detailed review. Website/RottenTomatoes and Metacritic are good starting points to find those critics; if the rating on RT is in the single-digits and/or the Metascore below 30, it's a potential candidate for this list.

to:

'''''Second Important Note:''''' It isn't a Horrible film just because anyone from Website/ThatGuyWithTheGlasses and/or any other CausticCritic reviewed it, or because it was on ''Series/MysteryScienceTheater3000''. Nor is it a Horrible film just because it earned a Razzie nomination/award for "Worst Picture." There needs to be independent evidence, such as reputable critics like Creator/RogerEbert and Creator/LeonardMaltin (emphasis on plural), for example, to list it. Once it is listed, they can provide the detailed review. Website/RottenTomatoes and Metacritic are good starting points to find those critics; if the rating on RT is in the single-digits and/or the Metascore below 30, it's a potential candidate for this list. In other words, universally despised by audience and critics alike.



!!Examples:

to:

!!Examples:Examples:
22nd Jun '16 8:12:45 PM MorphinBrony
Is there an issue? Send a Message


'''''Second Important Note:''''' It isn't a Horrible film just because anyone from Website/ThatGuyWithTheGlasses and/or any other CausticCritic reviewed it, or because it was on ''Series/MysteryScienceTheater3000''. Nor is it a Horrible film just because it earned a Razzie nomination/award for "Worst Picture." There needs to be independent evidence, such as actual critics like Creator/RogerEbert and Creator/LeonardMaltin (emphasis on plural), for example, to list it. Once it is listed, they can provide the detailed review. Website/RottenTomatoes and Metacritic are good starting points to find those critics; if the rating on RT is in the single-digits and/or the Metascore below 30, it's a potential candidate for this list.

to:

'''''Second Important Note:''''' It isn't a Horrible film just because anyone from Website/ThatGuyWithTheGlasses and/or any other CausticCritic reviewed it, or because it was on ''Series/MysteryScienceTheater3000''. Nor is it a Horrible film just because it earned a Razzie nomination/award for "Worst Picture." There needs to be independent evidence, such as actual reputable critics like Creator/RogerEbert and Creator/LeonardMaltin (emphasis on plural), for example, to list it. Once it is listed, they can provide the detailed review. Website/RottenTomatoes and Metacritic are good starting points to find those critics; if the rating on RT is in the single-digits and/or the Metascore below 30, it's a potential candidate for this list.
9th Feb '16 3:58:32 AM Spinosegnosaurus77
Is there an issue? Send a Message


And then...there's '''these''' films. The kind of movies that, when brought up, immediately send shivers up even the most hardened critic's spine. The kind of films so bad that they fail to appeal to the niche audiences they're shooting for. Films so bad that they disrupt the very fabric of space and time and make even scientists question just how these freakish anomalies of film slipped through the cracks. These are the kind of films ''nobody'' wants to have to see; the kind of films you wouldn't even wish on your worst enemies.

to:

And then...thenů there's '''these''' films. The kind of movies that, when brought up, immediately send shivers up even the most hardened critic's spine. The kind of films so bad that they fail to appeal to the niche audiences they're shooting for. Films so bad that they disrupt the very fabric of space and time and make even scientists question just how these freakish anomalies of film slipped through the cracks. These are the kind of films ''nobody'' wants to have to see; the kind of films you wouldn't even wish on your worst enemies.



'''''Second Important Note:''''' It isn't a Horrible film just because anyone from Website/ThatGuyWithTheGlasses and/or any other CausticCritic reviewed it, or because it was on ''Series/MysteryScienceTheater3000''. Nor is it a Horrible film just because it earned a Razzie nomination/award for "Worst Picture." There needs to be independent evidence, such as actual critics like Creator/RogerEbert and Creator/LeonardMaltin (emphasis on plural; Website/RottenTomatoes and Metacritic are good starting points to find those critics, and if the rating on RT is in the single-digits and/or the Metascore below 30, it's a potential candidate for this list) for example, to list it. Once it is listed, they can provide the detailed review.

to:

'''''Second Important Note:''''' It isn't a Horrible film just because anyone from Website/ThatGuyWithTheGlasses and/or any other CausticCritic reviewed it, or because it was on ''Series/MysteryScienceTheater3000''. Nor is it a Horrible film just because it earned a Razzie nomination/award for "Worst Picture." There needs to be independent evidence, such as actual critics like Creator/RogerEbert and Creator/LeonardMaltin (emphasis on plural; Website/RottenTomatoes and Metacritic are good starting points to find those critics, and if the rating on RT is in the single-digits and/or the Metascore below 30, it's a potential candidate for this list) plural), for example, to list it. Once it is listed, they can provide the detailed review. Website/RottenTomatoes and Metacritic are good starting points to find those critics; if the rating on RT is in the single-digits and/or the Metascore below 30, it's a potential candidate for this list.
8th Feb '16 3:56:42 AM Spinosegnosaurus77
Is there an issue? Send a Message


'''''Second Important Note:''''' It isn't a Horrible film just because anyone from Website/ThatGuyWithTheGlasses and/or any other CausticCritic reviewed it, or because it was on ''Series/MysteryScienceTheater3000''. Nor is it a Horrible film just because it earned a Razzie nomination/award for "Worst Picture." There needs to be independent evidence, such as actual critics like Creator/RogerEbert and Creator/LeonardMaltin (emphasis on plural; Website/RottenTomatoes is a good starting point to find those critics, and if the rating on RT is in the single-digits it's a potential candidate for this list) for example, to list it. (Though once it is listed, they can provide the detailed review.)

to:

'''''Second Important Note:''''' It isn't a Horrible film just because anyone from Website/ThatGuyWithTheGlasses and/or any other CausticCritic reviewed it, or because it was on ''Series/MysteryScienceTheater3000''. Nor is it a Horrible film just because it earned a Razzie nomination/award for "Worst Picture." There needs to be independent evidence, such as actual critics like Creator/RogerEbert and Creator/LeonardMaltin (emphasis on plural; Website/RottenTomatoes is a and Metacritic are good starting point points to find those critics, and if the rating on RT is in the single-digits and/or the Metascore below 30, it's a potential candidate for this list) for example, to list it. (Though once Once it is listed, they can provide the detailed review.)
29th Sep '15 1:40:50 PM hamza678
Is there an issue? Send a Message
24th Aug '15 12:28:04 PM Midna
Is there an issue? Send a Message


* [[Horrible/LiveActionFilms Live-Action Movies from 0-Z and Repeat Offenders]]

to:

* [[Horrible/LiveActionFilms Live-Action Movies from 0-Z and Repeat Offenders]]Movies]]
22nd Aug '15 5:13:45 AM Pikachu4Prezident
Is there an issue? Send a Message


!!Examples:



!!Examples:
* [[Horrible/LiveActionFilms Live-Action Movies from 0-Z and Repeat Offenders]]
* [[Horrible/AnimatedFilms Animated Films]]

to:

!!Examples:
* [[Horrible/LiveActionFilms
*[[Horrible/LiveActionFilms Live-Action Movies from 0-Z and Repeat Offenders]]
* [[Horrible/AnimatedFilms *[[Horrible/AnimatedFilms Animated Films]]
22nd Aug '15 5:12:59 AM Pikachu4Prezident
Is there an issue? Send a Message
22nd Aug '15 5:07:54 AM Pikachu4Prezident
Is there an issue? Send a Message


%%* DarthWiki/SoBadItsHorrible
This list shows the last 10 events of 2067. Show all.
http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/article_history.php?article=Horrible.Film