History Headscratchers / TitanicTheLegendGoesOn

18th May '16 2:23:28 AM Audrey_Who
Is there an issue? Send a Message





* Why the "Rapping Dog"? And, no, I don't mean "Why does it even exist in this film?". I know it's a BigLippedAlligatorMoment. What I mean is, why is it so many people focus on ''that'' particular scene in terms of historical innacuracy? I mean, the film itself is filled with AnachronismStew that it boils over. You've got dialogue that nobody would've used in 1912, clothing that nobody would've worn for decades, and so on and so forth. Yet, people always seem to focus on the "Rapping Dog". Is it really that hilariously out-of-place?
** Probably it's because ''everything'' about that sequence is just so out-of-place. The bad dialogue and anachronistic clothing are things that crop up in period pieces. A random, modern music video sequence? Not so much. Plus, the sequence fails all around. As the Nostalgia Critic put it, it would still be weird and out of nowhere even if the movie were set in modern times and the music was appropriate.
* Why is the opening score backwards in the uncut version?
** Easy, TheyJustDidntCare.

to:

* [[WMG: Why the "Rapping Dog"? Dog"?]]
And, no, I don't mean "Why does it even exist in this film?". I know it's a BigLippedAlligatorMoment. What I mean is, why is it so many people focus on ''that'' particular scene in terms of historical innacuracy? I mean, the film itself is filled with AnachronismStew that it boils over. You've got dialogue that nobody would've used in 1912, clothing that nobody would've worn for decades, and so on and so forth. Yet, people always seem to focus on the "Rapping Dog". Is it really that hilariously out-of-place?
** * Probably it's because ''everything'' about that sequence is just so out-of-place. The bad dialogue and anachronistic clothing are things that crop up in period pieces. A random, modern music video sequence? Not so much. Plus, the sequence fails all around. As the Nostalgia Critic put it, it would still be weird and out of nowhere even if the movie were set in modern times and the music was appropriate.
* ** It's also one of the earliest and most blatantly obvious signs that this movie is, well, completely off tonally speaking.

[[WMG:
Why is the opening score backwards in the uncut version?
**
version?]]
*
Easy, TheyJustDidntCare.
12th Dec '13 12:00:45 AM Sammettik
Is there an issue? Send a Message


* Why is the opening score backwards in the uncut version?

to:

* Why is the opening score backwards in the uncut version?version?
** Easy, TheyJustDidntCare.
22nd Jan '13 12:18:00 PM SuperLeviathan
Is there an issue? Send a Message


*** Given all the other DisneyAnimatedCanon ripoffs in this, the animators were likely trying to invoke TheGenieKnowsJackNicholson. But unlike the Genie in {{WesternAnimation/Aladdin}}, the dog isn't a magical being. Hell, he's not even fantastic like [[QuestForCamelot Devon and Cornwall]].
22nd Jan '13 12:17:16 PM SuperLeviathan
Is there an issue? Send a Message



to:

*** Given all the other DisneyAnimatedCanon ripoffs in this, the animators were likely trying to invoke TheGenieKnowsJackNicholson. But unlike the Genie in {{WesternAnimation/Aladdin}}, the dog isn't a magical being. Hell, he's not even fantastic like [[QuestForCamelot Devon and Cornwall]].
28th Oct '12 5:52:29 AM MichaelKatsuro
Is there an issue? Send a Message


[[WMG: How did the Dalmations know what Angelica's locket looked like?]]

* When the Dalmations see the locket in Molly's room, they say that it looks like the one Fritz told them to look for. The problem with that is that Fritz ''never told them what it looked like''. This is all he says:

to:

[[WMG: How did the Dalmations Dalmatians know what Angelica's locket looked like?]]

* When the Dalmations Dalmatians see the locket in Molly's room, they say that it looks like the one Fritz told them to look for. The problem with that is that Fritz ''never told them what it looked like''. This is all he says:
21st Jul '12 3:41:35 AM StevenT
Is there an issue? Send a Message


** Probably it's because ''everything'' about that sequence is just so out-of-place. The bad dialogue and anachronistic clothing are things that crop up in period pieces. A random, modern music video sequence? Not so much. Plus, the sequence fails all around. As the Nostalgia Critic put it, it would still be weird and out of nowhere even if the movie were set in modern times and the music was appropriate.

to:

** Probably it's because ''everything'' about that sequence is just so out-of-place. The bad dialogue and anachronistic clothing are things that crop up in period pieces. A random, modern music video sequence? Not so much. Plus, the sequence fails all around. As the Nostalgia Critic put it, it would still be weird and out of nowhere even if the movie were set in modern times and the music was appropriate.appropriate.

* Why is the opening score backwards in the uncut version?
21st Jul '12 3:39:07 AM StevenT
Is there an issue? Send a Message



to:

** FridgeBrilliance: If she's kind to animals, then she must pet a lot of animals. Maybe the scents of the animals she's petted got onto the locket.
6th Feb '12 7:49:12 AM ZeldaQueen
Is there an issue? Send a Message


* Why the "Rapping Dog"? And, no, I don't mean "Why does it even exist in this film?". I know it's a BigLippedAlligatorMoment. What I mean is, why is it so many people focus on ''that'' particular scene in terms of historical innacuracy? I mean, the film itself is filled with AnachronismStew that it boils over. You've got dialogue that nobody would've used in 1912, clothing that nobody would've worn for decades, and so on and so forth. Yet, people always seem to focus on the "Rapping Dog". Is it really that hilariously out-of-place?

to:

* Why the "Rapping Dog"? And, no, I don't mean "Why does it even exist in this film?". I know it's a BigLippedAlligatorMoment. What I mean is, why is it so many people focus on ''that'' particular scene in terms of historical innacuracy? I mean, the film itself is filled with AnachronismStew that it boils over. You've got dialogue that nobody would've used in 1912, clothing that nobody would've worn for decades, and so on and so forth. Yet, people always seem to focus on the "Rapping Dog". Is it really that hilariously out-of-place?out-of-place?
** Probably it's because ''everything'' about that sequence is just so out-of-place. The bad dialogue and anachronistic clothing are things that crop up in period pieces. A random, modern music video sequence? Not so much. Plus, the sequence fails all around. As the Nostalgia Critic put it, it would still be weird and out of nowhere even if the movie were set in modern times and the music was appropriate.
13th Jan '12 8:26:41 PM fluffything
Is there an issue? Send a Message


-->Fritz: Oh yes, and while you're on your rounds, keep an eye out for a locket that was lost by a very sweet person who is kind to animals.

to:

-->Fritz: Oh yes, and while you're on your rounds, keep an eye out for a locket that was lost by a very sweet person who is kind to animals.animals.

* Why the "Rapping Dog"? And, no, I don't mean "Why does it even exist in this film?". I know it's a BigLippedAlligatorMoment. What I mean is, why is it so many people focus on ''that'' particular scene in terms of historical innacuracy? I mean, the film itself is filled with AnachronismStew that it boils over. You've got dialogue that nobody would've used in 1912, clothing that nobody would've worn for decades, and so on and so forth. Yet, people always seem to focus on the "Rapping Dog". Is it really that hilariously out-of-place?
This list shows the last 9 events of 9. Show all.
http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/article_history.php?article=Headscratchers.TitanicTheLegendGoesOn