Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 3 (click to see context) from:
to:
*** If that's the case, shouldn't the writers have built on the characteristics that the characters already had, rather than taking them in a different direction, or depicting the girls in such a way That they are less able to self regulate? In some ways, [[CharacterDerailment it's like the girls are less mature now than when they were younger]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 2,3 (click to see context) from:
** To answer your question, it was always meant to be a continuation of the original {{WesternAnimation/Powerpuff Girls}} which depicts the girls as being Elementary Schoolers. Right from the start.
to:
** To answer your question, it was always meant to be a continuation of the original {{WesternAnimation/Powerpuff Girls}} WesternAnimation/ThePowerpuffGirls which depicts the girls as being Elementary Schoolers. Right from the start.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 45 (click to see context) from:
Judging by the character page for the girls, the 2016 series seems to be in an alternate continuity, but that doesn't make sense, because elements of the new show indicate that it picked up where the original series left off,such as characters aging, and the girls and Miss Keane being placed in a school where they work on more advanced material than they usually did at Pokey Oaks Kindergarten.
to:
** Judging by the character page for the girls, the 2016 series seems to be in an alternate continuity, but that continuity. That doesn't make sense, though, because there elements of the new show which indicate that it picked up where the original series left off,such off, such as characters aging, and the girls and Miss Keane being placed in a school where they work on more advanced material than they usually did at Pokey Oaks Kindergarten.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 44 (click to see context) from:
* Is the show in the same continuity as the Cartoon Network series? In the 2016 series, it was the professor who accidentally create the girls, but in the CN series, Mojo caused the accident. So...does the 2016 series take place in an alternate universe where Mojo wasn't the professor's pet monkey?
to:
* Is the show in the same continuity as the Cartoon Network series? In the 2016 series, it was the professor who accidentally create the girls, but in the CN series, Mojo caused the accident. So...does the 2016 series take place in an alternate universe where Mojo wasn't the professor's pet monkey?monkey?
Judging by the character page for the girls, the 2016 series seems to be in an alternate continuity, but that doesn't make sense, because elements of the new show indicate that it picked up where the original series left off,such as characters aging, and the girls and Miss Keane being placed in a school where they work on more advanced material than they usually did at Pokey Oaks Kindergarten.
Judging by the character page for the girls, the 2016 series seems to be in an alternate continuity, but that doesn't make sense, because elements of the new show indicate that it picked up where the original series left off,such as characters aging, and the girls and Miss Keane being placed in a school where they work on more advanced material than they usually did at Pokey Oaks Kindergarten.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Changed line(s) 35,37 (click to see context) from:
* Out of all the girls in the new reboot, Buttercup seems more one dimensional and a heroic comedic sociopath, as well seems dumber and more a anti hero, like a more short tempered Bart Simpson wannabe. She used to have the most character depth and was more legitimately multi layered(realistic) of the girls IMO. So what happened?
** That's more of a YMMV than a Headscratcher.
** That's more of a YMMV than a Headscratcher.
to:
** That's more of a YMMV than a Headscratcher.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 46 (click to see context) from:
* Is the show in the same continuity as the Cartoon Network series? In the reboot, it was the professor who accidentally create the girls, but in the CN series, Mojo caused the accident. So...does the 2016 series take place in an alternate universe where Mojo wasn't the professor's pet monkey?
to:
* Is the show in the same continuity as the Cartoon Network series? In the reboot, 2016 series, it was the professor who accidentally create the girls, but in the CN series, Mojo caused the accident. So...does the 2016 series take place in an alternate universe where Mojo wasn't the professor's pet monkey?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 46 (click to see context) from:
* Is the show in the same universe as the Cartoon Network series? In the reboot, it was the Professor who accidentally create the girls, but in the CN series, it was Mojo. So, does the 2016 series take place in an alternate universe where Mojo wasn't the professor's pet monkey?
to:
* Is the show in the same universe continuity as the Cartoon Network series? In the reboot, it was the Professor professor who accidentally create the girls, but in the CN series, it was Mojo. So, Mojo caused the accident. So...does the 2016 series take place in an alternate universe where Mojo wasn't the professor's pet monkey?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 44 (click to see context) from:
* Why didn't Silico just build more robot friends to replace the ones the girls accidentally broke?
to:
* Why didn't Silico just build more robot friends to replace the ones the girls accidentally broke?broke?
* Is the show in the same universe as the Cartoon Network series? In the reboot, it was the Professor who accidentally create the girls, but in the CN series, it was Mojo. So, does the 2016 series take place in an alternate universe where Mojo wasn't the professor's pet monkey?
* Is the show in the same universe as the Cartoon Network series? In the reboot, it was the Professor who accidentally create the girls, but in the CN series, it was Mojo. So, does the 2016 series take place in an alternate universe where Mojo wasn't the professor's pet monkey?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 23 (click to see context) from:
to:
** Because the network rebooted a beloved show and replaced its well-known and strongly-identifiable comedic mix of ultra-violent slapstick and cheeky & cheesy puns with little more than disposable memes and transient internet slang that says nothing and humors nobody. Generally, when a beloved show is revived, it's typically advisable to ensure it ''feels like'' the show used to, not just pander to twelve-year-old tumblr users.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 41 (click to see context) from:
** Probably because the school didn't want/couldn't get the old photographer back, or they felt that retakes weren't needed.
to:
** Probably because the school didn't want/couldn't get the old photographer back, or they felt that retakes weren't needed.needed.
* Why didn't Silico just build more robot friends to replace the ones the girls accidentally broke?
* Why didn't Silico just build more robot friends to replace the ones the girls accidentally broke?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 38,39 (click to see context) from:
** Because the photographer gave her weird instructions, didn't wait for her to be ready, and seemed pretty incompetent in general.
to:
** Because the photographer gave her weird instructions, didn't wait for her to be ready, and just seemed pretty incompetent in general.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 38,39 (click to see context) from:
** Because the photographer gave her weird, slightly contradictory instructions, and seemed pretty incompetent in general.
to:
** Because the photographer gave her weird, slightly contradictory weird instructions, didn't wait for her to be ready, and seemed pretty incompetent in general.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 22 (click to see context) from:
to:
*** The other problem, is a lot of times the humor relies on the meme...so anyone who isn't AWARE of memes will find it rather...disconcerting. Like the "No me gusta" face. If you don't know the face, it's just WEIRD. They're going a bit too far, and having the joke be ENTIRELY be 'the meme'. As they said...it's shoehorned in and doesn't fit.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Flame Bait
Deleted line(s) 9,11 (click to see context) :
* Besides, trans people are disgusting so who cares if they get made fun of.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* Besides, trans people are disgusting so who cares if they get made fun of.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 31 (click to see context) from:
to:
** Maybe she thought it was temporary?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 36,37 (click to see context) from:
** Because the photographer gave her weird, slightly contradictory instructions.
to:
** Because the photographer gave her weird, slightly contradictory instructions.
instructions, and seemed pretty incompetent in general.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 36,37 (click to see context) from:
* Why weren't the kids allowed to have retakes on their school photos when the photographer was fired for incompetence?
to:
* Why weren't the kids allowed to have retakes on their school photos when the photographer was fired for
** Probably because the school didn't want/couldn't get the old photographer back, or they felt that retakes weren't needed.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 16 (click to see context) from:
to:
** PoliticalCorrectnessGoneMad, basically. The original show had a strong creative vision, which included a cheeky, naughty sense of humor covered in a veneer of sugar and spice. But the revival has no real creative vision; it's just hazily-remembered tropes from the original show assembled into something focus groups assume kids will love (as long as it's been sanitized for their fragile little minds).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 34 (click to see context) from:
* Bubbles is the one who screwed up her school photo, so why does everyone act like it's the photographer's fault?
to:
* Bubbles is the one who screwed up her school photo, so why does everyone act like it's the photographer's fault?fault?
* Why weren't the kids allowed to have retakes on their school photos when the photographer was fired for incompetence?
* Why weren't the kids allowed to have retakes on their school photos when the photographer was fired for incompetence?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 32 (click to see context) from:
to:
** That's more of a YMMV than a Headscratcher.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 31 (click to see context) from:
* Out of all the girls in the new reboot, Buttercup seems more one dimensional and a heroic comedic sociopath, as well seems dumber and more a anti hero, like a more short tempered Bart Simpson wannabe. She used to have the most character depth and was more legitimately multi layered(realistic) of the girls IMO. So what happened?
to:
* Out of all the girls in the new reboot, Buttercup seems more one dimensional and a heroic comedic sociopath, as well seems dumber and more a anti hero, like a more short tempered Bart Simpson wannabe. She used to have the most character depth and was more legitimately multi layered(realistic) of the girls IMO. So what happened?happened?
* Bubbles is the one who screwed up her school photo, so why does everyone act like it's the photographer's fault?
* Bubbles is the one who screwed up her school photo, so why does everyone act like it's the photographer's fault?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 31 (click to see context) from:
* Out of all the girls in the new reboot, Buttercup seems more one dimensional and a heroic comedic sociopath, as well seems dumber and more a anti hero, like a more short tempered Bart Simpson wannabe. She used to have the most character depth and was more legitimately multi layered of the girls IMO. So what happened?
to:
* Out of all the girls in the new reboot, Buttercup seems more one dimensional and a heroic comedic sociopath, as well seems dumber and more a anti hero, like a more short tempered Bart Simpson wannabe. She used to have the most character depth and was more legitimately multi layered layered(realistic) of the girls IMO. So what happened?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 29 (click to see context) from:
** She never specified it was just romantic love that turns her into a giant spider.
to:
** She never specified it was just romantic love that turns her into a giant spider.spider.
* Out of all the girls in the new reboot, Buttercup seems more one dimensional and a heroic comedic sociopath, as well seems dumber and more a anti hero, like a more short tempered Bart Simpson wannabe. She used to have the most character depth and was more legitimately multi layered of the girls IMO. So what happened?
* Out of all the girls in the new reboot, Buttercup seems more one dimensional and a heroic comedic sociopath, as well seems dumber and more a anti hero, like a more short tempered Bart Simpson wannabe. She used to have the most character depth and was more legitimately multi layered of the girls IMO. So what happened?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 20 (click to see context) from:
to:
**** Hell, [[BrokenBase a lot of people]] find them cheesy and corny now.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 19,20 (click to see context) from:
*** Not to mention memes, slangs, and twerking date the series. If your kids were to watch this decades later, they would find these things a little cheesy and corny.
to:
*** Not to mention memes, slangs, and twerking date the series. If your kids children were to watch this decades later, they would find these things a little cheesy and corny.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 19,20 (click to see context) from:
*** Not to mention memes, slangs, and twerking dates the series.
to:
*** Not to mention memes, slangs, and twerking dates date the series.series. If your kids were to watch this decades later, they would find these things a little cheesy and corny.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 19 (click to see context) from:
to:
*** Not to mention memes, slangs, and twerking dates the series.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 27 (click to see context) from:
** She never specified it was romantic love that turns her into a giant spider.
to:
** She never specified it was just romantic love that turns her into a giant spider.
