History Headscratchers / RaymanLegends

15th Sep '17 4:12:11 PM streakson22
Is there an issue? Send a Message

Added DiffLines:

** It's now available in the Definitive Edition, and right from the start too.
11th Jun '17 3:19:10 PM nombretomado
Is there an issue? Send a Message


** That being said, many of these complainers ignore the fact that Ubisoft added 30 levels and extra content during those months of the delay. So if the Wii U version did come out when it was originally meant to then Nintendo buyers would be complaining that they got the lesser version compared to the [=PS3=]/360 versions. Ubisoft seemed to make the right decision in delaying it so all versions would be equal when they all were out, but [[UnpleasableFanbase some people]] want to see this as nothing but a greedy move (despite the fact that ZombiU bombed in sales so it's understandable why Ubisoft might realize they shouldn't place too many bets solely on a console that hasn't sold many systems). Also there's the UnfortunateImplications of people boycotting the game because of this despite the fact that obviously this decision would have been made by higher-up executives and not the majority of the development team. Yes, boycotting the game punishes the executives, but it also punishes the development team that went up and beyond to add so much to the game for the fans. As for people who bought a Wii U just so they could play Rayman Legends, well they shouldn't act like this sort of thing hasn't happened. The first Bioshock eventually became available for the [=PS3=] when it was previously only on the 360/PC, and later it happened again with the first Mass Effect. When it comes to third-party titles you should never assume it might not go multi-platform save for certain developers (like NaughtyDog works exclusively with Sony).

to:

** That being said, many of these complainers ignore the fact that Ubisoft added 30 levels and extra content during those months of the delay. So if the Wii U version did come out when it was originally meant to then Nintendo buyers would be complaining that they got the lesser version compared to the [=PS3=]/360 versions. Ubisoft seemed to make the right decision in delaying it so all versions would be equal when they all were out, but [[UnpleasableFanbase some people]] want to see this as nothing but a greedy move (despite the fact that ZombiU VideoGame/ZombiU bombed in sales so it's understandable why Ubisoft might realize they shouldn't place too many bets solely on a console that hasn't sold many systems). Also there's the UnfortunateImplications of people boycotting the game because of this despite the fact that obviously this decision would have been made by higher-up executives and not the majority of the development team. Yes, boycotting the game punishes the executives, but it also punishes the development team that went up and beyond to add so much to the game for the fans. As for people who bought a Wii U just so they could play Rayman Legends, well they shouldn't act like this sort of thing hasn't happened. The first Bioshock eventually became available for the [=PS3=] when it was previously only on the 360/PC, and later it happened again with the first Mass Effect. When it comes to third-party titles you should never assume it might not go multi-platform save for certain developers (like NaughtyDog works exclusively with Sony).
10th Jun '17 1:40:49 PM nombretomado
Is there an issue? Send a Message


** The thing is, VideoGame/RaymanOrigins was a MultiPlatform game to begin with. ''VideoGame/RaymanLegends'' is supposed to be a WiiU exclusive. And the main issue is not the delay to the blockbuster season, but the reason why it's delayed. When you promised fans that this would be an exclusive and ready for release on February only to [[MoneyDearBoy turn back on ]][[ExecutiveMeddling your promise]], the fans who bought the WiiU for this game [[InternetBackdraft are not going to be happy.]] MultiPlatform is understandable, but delaying an already completed game for that is inexcusable. How would UsefulNotes/XBox360 and UsefulNotes/{{PS3}} fans feel if they heard that VideoGame/BatmanArkhamCity was delayed just because Creator/WarnerBros wanted it to be released alongside with WiiU verison?

to:

** The thing is, VideoGame/RaymanOrigins was a MultiPlatform game to begin with. ''VideoGame/RaymanLegends'' is supposed to be a WiiU UsefulNotes/WiiU exclusive. And the main issue is not the delay to the blockbuster season, but the reason why it's delayed. When you promised fans that this would be an exclusive and ready for release on February only to [[MoneyDearBoy turn back on ]][[ExecutiveMeddling your promise]], the fans who bought the WiiU Wii U for this game [[InternetBackdraft are not going to be happy.]] MultiPlatform is understandable, but delaying an already completed game for that is inexcusable. How would UsefulNotes/XBox360 and UsefulNotes/{{PS3}} fans feel if they heard that VideoGame/BatmanArkhamCity was delayed just because Creator/WarnerBros wanted it to be released alongside with WiiU verison?Wii U version?
29th May '17 11:42:24 AM nombretomado
Is there an issue? Send a Message


** The thing is, VideoGame/RaymanOrigins was a MultiPlatform game to begin with. ''VideoGame/RaymanLegends'' is supposed to be a WiiU exclusive. And the main issue is not the delay to the blockbuster season, but the reason why it's delayed. When you promised fans that this would be an exclusive and ready for release on February only to [[MoneyDearBoy turn back on ]][[ExecutiveMeddling your promise]], the fans who bought the WiiU for this game [[InternetBackdraft are not going to be happy.]] MultiPlatform is understandable, but delaying an already completed game for that is inexcusable. How would UsefulNotes/XBox360 and UsefulNotes/{{PS3}} fans feel if they heard that VideoGame/BatmanArkhamCity was delayed just because WarnerBros wanted it to be released alongside with WiiU verison?

to:

** The thing is, VideoGame/RaymanOrigins was a MultiPlatform game to begin with. ''VideoGame/RaymanLegends'' is supposed to be a WiiU exclusive. And the main issue is not the delay to the blockbuster season, but the reason why it's delayed. When you promised fans that this would be an exclusive and ready for release on February only to [[MoneyDearBoy turn back on ]][[ExecutiveMeddling your promise]], the fans who bought the WiiU for this game [[InternetBackdraft are not going to be happy.]] MultiPlatform is understandable, but delaying an already completed game for that is inexcusable. How would UsefulNotes/XBox360 and UsefulNotes/{{PS3}} fans feel if they heard that VideoGame/BatmanArkhamCity was delayed just because WarnerBros Creator/WarnerBros wanted it to be released alongside with WiiU verison?
24th May '16 8:17:12 PM nombretomado
Is there an issue? Send a Message


** The thing is, VideoGame/RaymanOrigins was a MultiPlatform game to begin with. ''VideoGame/RaymanLegends'' is supposed to be a WiiU exclusive. And the main issue is not the delay to the blockbuster season, but the reason why it's delayed. When you promised fans that this would be an exclusive and ready for release on February only to [[MoneyDearBoy turn back on ]][[ExecutiveMeddling your promise]], the fans who bought the WiiU for this game [[InternetBackdraft are not going to be happy.]] MultiPlatform is understandable, but delaying an already completed game for that is inexcusable. How would Xbox360 and PS3 fans feel if they heard that VideoGame/BatmanArkhamCity was delayed just because WarnerBros wanted it to be released alongside with WiiU verison?

to:

** The thing is, VideoGame/RaymanOrigins was a MultiPlatform game to begin with. ''VideoGame/RaymanLegends'' is supposed to be a WiiU exclusive. And the main issue is not the delay to the blockbuster season, but the reason why it's delayed. When you promised fans that this would be an exclusive and ready for release on February only to [[MoneyDearBoy turn back on ]][[ExecutiveMeddling your promise]], the fans who bought the WiiU for this game [[InternetBackdraft are not going to be happy.]] MultiPlatform is understandable, but delaying an already completed game for that is inexcusable. How would Xbox360 UsefulNotes/XBox360 and PS3 UsefulNotes/{{PS3}} fans feel if they heard that VideoGame/BatmanArkhamCity was delayed just because WarnerBros wanted it to be released alongside with WiiU verison?



** That being said, many of these complainers ignore the fact that Ubisoft added 30 levels and extra content during those months of the delay. So if the Wii U version did come out when it was originally meant to then Nintendo buyers would be complaining that they got the lesser version compared to the PS3/360 versions. Ubisoft seemed to make the right decision in delaying it so all versions would be equal when they all were out, but [[UnpleasableFanbase some people]] want to see this as nothing but a greedy move (despite the fact that ZombiU bombed in sales so it's understandable why Ubisoft might realize they shouldn't place too many bets solely on a console that hasn't sold many systems). Also there's the UnfortunateImplications of people boycotting the game because of this despite the fact that obviously this decision would have been made by higher-up executives and not the majority of the development team. Yes, boycotting the game punishes the executives, but it also punishes the development team that went up and beyond to add so much to the game for the fans. As for people who bought a Wii U just so they could play Rayman Legends, well they shouldn't act like this sort of thing hasn't happened. The first Bioshock eventually became available for the PS3 when it was previously only on the 360/PC, and later it happened again with the first Mass Effect. When it comes to third-party titles you should never assume it might not go multi-platform save for certain developers (like NaughtyDog works exclusively with Sony).

to:

** That being said, many of these complainers ignore the fact that Ubisoft added 30 levels and extra content during those months of the delay. So if the Wii U version did come out when it was originally meant to then Nintendo buyers would be complaining that they got the lesser version compared to the PS3/360 [=PS3=]/360 versions. Ubisoft seemed to make the right decision in delaying it so all versions would be equal when they all were out, but [[UnpleasableFanbase some people]] want to see this as nothing but a greedy move (despite the fact that ZombiU bombed in sales so it's understandable why Ubisoft might realize they shouldn't place too many bets solely on a console that hasn't sold many systems). Also there's the UnfortunateImplications of people boycotting the game because of this despite the fact that obviously this decision would have been made by higher-up executives and not the majority of the development team. Yes, boycotting the game punishes the executives, but it also punishes the development team that went up and beyond to add so much to the game for the fans. As for people who bought a Wii U just so they could play Rayman Legends, well they shouldn't act like this sort of thing hasn't happened. The first Bioshock eventually became available for the PS3 [=PS3=] when it was previously only on the 360/PC, and later it happened again with the first Mass Effect. When it comes to third-party titles you should never assume it might not go multi-platform save for certain developers (like NaughtyDog works exclusively with Sony).
6th Mar '14 5:46:51 AM ZuTheSkunk
Is there an issue? Send a Message

Added DiffLines:

** It's most likely meant to show him acting like a bully [[ForTheEvulz for the hell of it]]. Unless it's supposed to be an equivalent of honking on boobs...
1st Feb '14 3:40:49 PM ioriscrub
Is there an issue? Send a Message


** Because changes to the game's mechanics means that the level would be [[{{Unwinnable}} outright impossible to complete without fundamental design changes.]] The level relies on "bubblized" enemies for some of its sections, and would have to be redesigned in those sections. Although the remade Origins levels do sometimes divert, [=LotLD=] would require more precise changes.

to:

** Because changes to the game's mechanics means that the level would be [[{{Unwinnable}} outright impossible to complete without fundamental design changes.]] The level relies on "bubblized" enemies for some of its sections, and would have to be redesigned in those sections. Although the remade Origins levels do sometimes divert, [=LotLD=] would require more precise changes.changes.
** OP here: I didn't consider that. That makes a lot of sense actually.
30th Jan '14 6:38:27 PM VPhantom
Is there an issue? Send a Message


** The thing is, VideoGame/RaymanOrigins was a MultiPlatform game to begin with. RaymanLegends is supposed to be a WiiU exclusive. And the main issue is not the delayment to the blockbuster season, but the reason why it's delayed. When you promised fans that this would be an exclusive and ready for release on February only to [[MoneyDearBoy turn back on ]][[ExecutiveMeddling your promise]], the fans who bought the WiiU for this game [[InternetBackdraft are not going to be happy.]] MultiPlatform is understandable, but delaying an already completed game for that is inexcusable. How would Xbox360 and PS3 fans feel if they heard that VideoGame/BatmanArkhamCity was delayed just because WarnerBros wanted it to be released alongside with WiiU verison?

to:

** The thing is, VideoGame/RaymanOrigins was a MultiPlatform game to begin with. RaymanLegends ''VideoGame/RaymanLegends'' is supposed to be a WiiU exclusive. And the main issue is not the delayment delay to the blockbuster season, but the reason why it's delayed. When you promised fans that this would be an exclusive and ready for release on February only to [[MoneyDearBoy turn back on ]][[ExecutiveMeddling your promise]], the fans who bought the WiiU for this game [[InternetBackdraft are not going to be happy.]] MultiPlatform is understandable, but delaying an already completed game for that is inexcusable. How would Xbox360 and PS3 fans feel if they heard that VideoGame/BatmanArkhamCity was delayed just because WarnerBros wanted it to be released alongside with WiiU verison?
23rd Jan '14 11:04:14 PM FreezairForALimitedTime
Is there an issue? Send a Message


* So of all the Rayman Origins levels NOT to include, why the hell not Land of the Livid Dead? It was the best level of the game! Instead all we get is the fight with big mama at the end.

to:

* So of all the Rayman Origins levels NOT to include, why the hell not Land of the Livid Dead? It was the best level of the game! Instead all we get is the fight with big mama at the end.end.
** Because changes to the game's mechanics means that the level would be [[{{Unwinnable}} outright impossible to complete without fundamental design changes.]] The level relies on "bubblized" enemies for some of its sections, and would have to be redesigned in those sections. Although the remade Origins levels do sometimes divert, [=LotLD=] would require more precise changes.
18th Jan '14 1:04:57 PM ioriscrub
Is there an issue? Send a Message


* Maybe I'm just being dumb (which is probable) but what's with the Magician's obsession with honking the Teensie damsels' noses? Is there some sort of DoubleEntendre I'm missing?

to:

* Maybe I'm just being dumb (which is probable) but what's with the Magician's obsession with honking the Teensie damsels' noses? Is there some sort of DoubleEntendre I'm missing?missing?
* So of all the Rayman Origins levels NOT to include, why the hell not Land of the Livid Dead? It was the best level of the game! Instead all we get is the fight with big mama at the end.
This list shows the last 10 events of 26. Show all.
http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/article_history.php?article=Headscratchers.RaymanLegends