History Headscratchers / MontyPythonsLifeofBrian

!!Who exactly IS Biggus Dickus?]]

Not meant to be taken seriously, but can anyone come up with a reasonable headcannon for this guy?

We know it's 33 AD because of the caption at the beginning. It must be passover because Pilate is setting a prisoner free. But according to the Gospel, Barabbas was set free that year, not Brian. Furthermore, when Brian arrives at Golgotha, Jesus should be there! We never see Jesus brought before Pilate, he isn't being crucified at Golgotha, and he isn't even offered as one of the prisoners to be freed. This would all be well and good except it's 33 AD, chosen specifically because it was traditionally the year Jesus was crucified. So where is he? Why was he not brought before Pilate, why wasn't he at Golgotha? Passover comes but once a year.

[[WMG: Who exactly IS Biggus Dickus?]]

[[WMG: Where is Jesus?]]

[[WMG: Brian is not Jesus]]
* This is more of an audience reaction JBM, since the movie itself is awesome. It REALLY bugs me when people, whether religious zealots OR smug atheists, try to say that Brian was supposed to be Jesus. Within the movie itself, Monty Python makes it VERY obvious that Brian is NOT Jesus:
** 1) Jesus is born in a stable near the one Brian is born in, and after the case of mistaken identity, the 3 wise men go to the correct stable.
*** Some people complain about this bit, saying its an insult to the Wise Men to think them capable of error like that.
** 2) Brian attends the Sermon on the Mount with his mother; some of the others in the back of the crowd mishear the Beatitudes (did he say "blessed are the Greek?!").
** 3) When the ex-leper is begging for alms and Brian asks who cured him, he replies "Jesus did, sir". The whole joke of that scene was how Jesus took away his livelihood, since the man only knew how to beg.
** On top of that, I hate it when they say "but if he wasn't Jesus, then why was he crucified at the end?" Um, YouFailHistoryForever. Crucifixion was a VERY common method of execution used by the Romans (and others), not to mention the final shot of the film showed just how many people were being crucified on that very same day. Were ALL OF THEM JESUS?!?!!!!11oneone
** [[IAmSpartacus "I'm Jesus, and so is my wife!"]]
*** Also, Brian was crucified by being tied to the cross; Jesus was crucified by being nailed to one. These were different forms of crucifixion. The Brian version killed one with thirst and heat, and was, despite the less gory appearance, in fact very cruel as one was just stuck there dying for several days - [[FridgeHorror that much for the movie ending...]]
*** Actually they were the same. The difference was whether or not their feet were supported.
*** Although if you look closely, they do have nails through their hands (... not wrists) too. The thing that bugs ''me'' is that you can see them standing on little platforms rather than hanging there. Surely they could have put up with being actually crucified for their art? Just a little bit... to make it more realistic... I had assumed the ropes were there for the same reason, to stop them from actually dying.
*** If they hadn't any support for the legs, the nails would rip the hands' tissue, which means they wouldn't stay crucified. Probably same reason why they both tied ''and'' nailed the hands to the cross. In fact, every crucifix has a little platform under Jesus feet.
*** Nope. I've never seen a crucifix pendant that had the foot thing instead of the pointed-down toes, and even the only huge, church-wall Jesus crucifix I've seen had the "ankles crossed, with a nail through them/the bottom of the shins" pose. I may have seen a single painting with the platform, but that's it. While common in RealLife, I've found them amazingly ''un''common in depictions of the Crucifixion.
*** The platform isn't to stop tissue from tearing, it's to prevent death within minutes instead of days. With arms tied like that and the body dangling, it isn't possible to breath in and people would asphyxiate. It's possible to hold yourself in that position for longer if you have the endurance only because in that situation the muscles are tensed and the support is coming from the trunk, rather than being hung by outspread arms.
*** The thing that stopped tissue from tearing is that the nail didn't go through the hands, but through the wrist bones. The Greek word for "hand" referred to the area from the palm to about either midway through forearm or the elbow.
** Brian isn't supposed to literally be Jesus within the story, but the similarities between the two characters were deliberate.
*** What similarities? Other than being 2 Jewish men born in a stable during Roman occupation, the two are entirely different even just within the movie. In fact, my following examples are coming ONLY from the flick, with nothing from the Bible or any other source. Jesus is explicitly referred to as being able to work miracles (ex-leper's testimony, at least). Jesus deliberately tries to preach to people in the Sermon on the Mount and actually has a message, whereas Brian just says gibberish to fit in with the scene until the Roman soldiers leave, refusing to continue once the danger is past. If anything, and Python themselves said as much in many interviews since then, they deliberately highlighted the differences between the two in order to make it EXPLICIT that they were not lampooning Christ himself, but the way many people (some Christians included) act.
*** Yes, those scenes show differences between Brian and Jesus, but they're deliberately juxtaposed so that you can see similarities as well. The point is to show Brian as a mundane version of Jesus. His life parallels Jesus's even without his intending it to and despite his lack of any claim to divinity. Jesus can perform miracles and Brian can't, but Brian's followers are just as convinced as Jesus's that he can, all evidence to the contrary. And they justify it using circular logic like "only the true messiah denies his divinity," fight over their interpretations of trivial details that don't mean anything, and so forth. It is mocking zealots for making SeriousBusiness out of absolutely nothing, but that in itself suggests that there doesn't ''need'' to be more than absolutely nothing-the zealots will make it SeriousBusiness anyway. The Pythons decided to [[JesusWasWayCool throw Jesus a bone]] by depicting him as real and actually the son of God, but they're also saying that this doesn't make a hell of a lot of difference; he might have become the central figure of a religion even if he hadn't been special at all.
*** HI, it's me, the original complainer. My complaint wasn't that Brian was similar to Jesus; it was that so many people, upon viewing the movie, think that he was supposed to literally BE Jesus, even though it's very clear that they are two separate people. I was complaining about how most ViewersAreMorons and it ended being the case that most repliers here are CompletelyMissingThePoint of my original post.
*** Probably because you responded to somebody pointing out that the characters are deliberately similar by arguing that they're not. But whatever.
*** Monty Python themselves argue over every little thing in this movie. They wrote it together, yet they still can't reach a consensus on what they were actually saying! It's almost as funny as the movie itself.

* Perhaps this was a year or two off from when Jesus was supposed to have been killed.

* This is an alternate universe, differing from ours only by the addition of Brian. The Jewish authorities take no notice of the person who smashing up the temple because they are too occupied with the prophet who is attracting the crowds by denying he is the Messiah and the Romans are, likewise, too occupied trying to capture the cunning guerilla who dared to write 'Romans Go Home' 100 times to bother about any other potential threat. So no-one bothers to arrest Jesus, which means he avoids crucifixion. Presumably, in this universe instead of Christianity we have 'Cohenity' or 'Brianity' where everyone gathers to chant "We are all individuals"

*** Yes, those scenes show differences between Brian and Jesus, but they're deliberately juxtaposed so that you can see similarities as well. The point is to show Brian as a mundane version of Jesus. His life parallels Jesus's even without his intending it to and despite his lack of any claim to divinity. Jesus can perform miracles and Brian can't, but Brian's followers are just as convinced as Jesus's that he can, all evidence to the contrary. And they justify it using circular logic like "only the true messiah denies his divinity," fight over their interpretations of trivial details that don't mean anything, and so forth. It is mocking zealots for making SeriousBusiness out of absolutely nothing, but that in itself suggests that there doesn't ''need'' to be more than absolutely nothing -- the zealots will make it SeriousBusiness anyway. The Pythons decided to [[JesusWasWayCool throw Jesus a bone]] by depicting him as real and actually the son of God, but they're also saying that this doesn't make a hell of a lot of difference; he might have become the central figure of a religion even if he hadn't been special at all.

* So when the crowd says that "only the true Messiah denies his divinity", Brian tries to turn this around by saying he ''is'' the Messiah, only for them to just believe that. Wouldn't the best response have been to just ask anyone (or ''everyone'') in the crowd if ''they'' were the Messiah? (Of course, given the idea of the scene, the crowd would probably have just responded by saying they weren't and not getting what that then implies, or coming up with some stupid reason why asking if someone else is the Messiah means you are the Messiah.)

** FridgeBrilliance: in that universe, the MoralGuardians were right to protest ''Monty Python's Life of Brian'', since it was a silly comedy making fun of a major religious founder.

We know it's 33 AD because of the caption at the beginning. It must be passover because Pilate is setting a prisoner free. But according to the Gospel, Barabus was set free that year, not Brian. Furthermore, when Brian arrives at Golgotha, Jesus should be there! We never see Jesus brought before Pilate, he isn't being crucified at Golgotha, and he isn't even offered as one of the prisoners to be freed. This would all be well and good except it's 33 AD, chosen specifically because it was traditionally the year Jesus was crucified. So where is he? Why was he not brought before Pilate, why wasn't he at Golgotha? Passover comes but once a year.

* I was under the impression that the prisoner preceding Mr. Cheeky was Jesus, included to indicate that this was indeed the date of his execution. I imagine that he wasn't included in the later scenes due to respect - can you really imagine Jesus, our Lord and Saviour, who died for our sins, etc. singing ''Bright Side of Life''? Releasing Brian rather than Barabus was simply so they could make a IAmSpartacus [[RuleOfFunny joke]].

* Well, simple. Brian ''is'' Barbarus, the Bible got the name wrong.
* Alternatively to both of the above, the Bible of the universe this movie takes place simply identifies Brian as being the person who was freed rather than being Barabus.