History Headscratchers / Foundation

11th Feb '18 1:01:36 PM thorgold
Is there an issue? Send a Message

Added DiffLines:

*** Ultimately, "free will" is ''not'' free. The decisions people make are products of their environment; while an everyday Joe might have the "free will" to spontaneously commit murder in broad daylight, the odds of someone actually doing that are infinitesimally small. Furthermore, the actions of individuals are meaningless in the face of macro-scale human social dynamics. Even people in power are limited in their options and thought patterns due to social and political inertia, as demonstrated by General Riose. And, all that aside, psychoshitory is fundamentally a ''probabilistic'' science - it only determines the likelihood of events, not perfect prediction. The primary focus of the Seldon Plan, especially early on, is setting the starting conditions such that the odds get stacked towards people "choosing" the right courses of action.
1st Nov '17 7:50:30 AM Mr.Phorcys
Is there an issue? Send a Message


*** And yet, even if someone's accomplishments are the product of social movements, those social movements should be able to be anticipated by psychohistory -- thus the Mule should have been anticipated. As the Empire in ''Foundation'' is roughly the Roman Empire during its collapse, mighty conquerors should be expected -- see Attila the Hun, Odoacer, etc. Additionally, the Crisis of the Third Century saw the apparently-imminent collapse of the Roman Empire averted, though many of the same reasons would cause the collapse of the Western Roman Empire centuries later.

to:

*** And yet, even if someone's accomplishments are the product of social movements, those social movements should be able to be anticipated by psychohistory -- thus the Mule should have been anticipated. As the Empire in ''Foundation'' is roughly the Roman Empire during its collapse, mighty conquerors should be expected -- see Attila the Hun, Odoacer, etc. Additionally, the Crisis of the Third Century saw the apparently-imminent collapse of the Roman Empire averted, though many of the same external reasons would cause the collapse of the Western Roman Empire centuries later.later. In that case, reform should have been a possibility for the Empire. Furthermore, there has never been a case where the entirety of civilization has fallen into a dark age (even in the Bronze Age Collapse, it didn't apply to China), so the outcome of psychohistory lacks historical precedent.
1st Nov '17 7:44:50 AM Mr.Phorcys
Is there an issue? Send a Message


*** And yet, even if someone's accomplishments are the product of social movements, those social movements should be able to be anticipated by psychohistory -- thus the Mule should have been anticipated. As the Empire in ''Foundation'' is roughly the Roman Empire during its collapse, mighty conquerors should be expected -- see Attila the Hun, Odoacer, etc.

to:

*** And yet, even if someone's accomplishments are the product of social movements, those social movements should be able to be anticipated by psychohistory -- thus the Mule should have been anticipated. As the Empire in ''Foundation'' is roughly the Roman Empire during its collapse, mighty conquerors should be expected -- see Attila the Hun, Odoacer, etc. Additionally, the Crisis of the Third Century saw the apparently-imminent collapse of the Roman Empire averted, though many of the same reasons would cause the collapse of the Western Roman Empire centuries later.
1st Nov '17 7:02:39 AM Mr.Phorcys
Is there an issue? Send a Message

Added DiffLines:

*** And yet, even if someone's accomplishments are the product of social movements, those social movements should be able to be anticipated by psychohistory -- thus the Mule should have been anticipated. As the Empire in ''Foundation'' is roughly the Roman Empire during its collapse, mighty conquerors should be expected -- see Attila the Hun, Odoacer, etc.
9th Apr '17 9:58:04 PM Sharlee
Is there an issue? Send a Message


** Dogs, at least, had definitely evolved into something very different from what you or I would call a "dog". In ''Foundation and Earth'', the explorer who encountered the feral dog pack underestimated them because he couldn't even ''conceive'' of a dog being aggressive or dangerous, suggesting that they've been selectively bred (or discretely culled by human-protective robots) to be completely submissive and perhaps toothless.

to:

** Dogs, at least, had definitely evolved into something very different from what you or I would call a "dog". In ''Foundation and Earth'', the explorer who encountered the feral dog pack underestimated them because he couldn't even ''conceive'' of a dog being aggressive or dangerous, suggesting that they've been selectively bred (or discretely culled by human-protective robots) to be completely submissive and perhaps toothless.toothless.
* The way Galactic civilization declines outside the Foundation seems implausible, as every time knowledge of atomics is lost, the people for whom it's become LostTechnology seem to switch over to chemical fuels without much trouble. But these same declining societies are alleged to have forgotten pretty much everything about practical science and engineering of ''their'' time, let alone of technologies that became obsolete before recorded history. So who's figuring out how to power ground-cars and spaceships with chemical fuels, if there aren't any competent mechanics or physicists to reverse-engineer them? Sure, fossil fuels may be "primitive" by Galactic standards, but they're ''far'' from entry-level technologies that just anyone could whip up on the fly.
1st Oct '16 9:11:13 PM Sharlee
Is there an issue? Send a Message


*** Not exactly evolution, mind you. As to the original post, FasterThanLightTravel has existed since the end of the 20th/beginning of the 21st century in this 'verse.

to:

*** Not exactly evolution, mind you. As to the original post, FasterThanLightTravel has existed since the end of the 20th/beginning of the 21st century in this 'verse.'verse.
** Dogs, at least, had definitely evolved into something very different from what you or I would call a "dog". In ''Foundation and Earth'', the explorer who encountered the feral dog pack underestimated them because he couldn't even ''conceive'' of a dog being aggressive or dangerous, suggesting that they've been selectively bred (or discretely culled by human-protective robots) to be completely submissive and perhaps toothless.
29th Aug '16 8:57:27 AM Milarqui
Is there an issue? Send a Message


*** Simply, Seldon calculated that the external crisis would boil up to a point where one of the Four Kingdoms would think they had a chance to get away with toppling the Foundation, which would survive thanks to the religion of science, or rather, its hold in the minds of the people. The fact that it seemed to be timed with the prince's coming of age is just random chance - and, in fact, Hardin mentions that he believes the external crisis was accelerated when the Foundation found the Imperial cruiser. Plus, it is not just a few days passing between the crisis happening and Seldon's appearance, as it is obvious that, at least, a couple of weeks have gone by - Hardin has had to travel to the other Four Kingdoms to argue for the signing of the new treaties that give the Foundation greater power.



** Who says they haven't evolved? Granted, 20,000 or so years is not enough time for a massive evolutionary change to occur naturally. But, for example, Daneel managed to introduce telepathy into the ''entire'' Gaian population, rather than just a genetically-gifted minority! The Solarians re-engineered themselves into hermaphroditic psychokinetics who reproduce via parthenogenesis!

to:

** Who says they haven't evolved? Granted, 20,000 or so years is not enough time for a massive evolutionary change to occur naturally. But, for example, Daneel managed to introduce telepathy into the ''entire'' Gaian population, rather than just a genetically-gifted minority! The Solarians re-engineered themselves into hermaphroditic psychokinetics who reproduce via parthenogenesis!parthenogenesis!
*** Not exactly evolution, mind you. As to the original post, FasterThanLightTravel has existed since the end of the 20th/beginning of the 21st century in this 'verse.
11th Feb '16 10:46:17 AM OddHack
Is there an issue? Send a Message

Added DiffLines:

** Even if you accept that psychohistory could (at least for story purposes) predict what crisis would arise and how it would be resolved, the idea that it could be timed well enough to correspond to Seldon's pre-scheduled appearances seems too precise. Anacreon's attack was timed to coincide with the prince's coming of age -- how could that be aligned (within a few days) to Seldon's appearance on a anniversary of the Foundation? Even if the Second Foundation was manipulating things behind the scenes, it seems hard to believe.
12th Dec '15 7:55:27 AM Thibaud
Is there an issue? Send a Message


*** All right, you are correct, but still : the European Middle Ages continued using the Ancients' proto-scientific method and perfected it into the modern scientific method (e.g. : creating the Universities : la Sorbonne, Bologne, Trantor). The original argument is still invalid :)
To clarify, my argument was not "the European Middle Ages were the best or even the first good, pro-science civilization ever". I was answering the argument : "The European Middle Ages was a bad, anti-science civilization". I think it is pretty easy to demonstrate the European Middle Ages was not an anti-science civilization. It does not mean that other civilization weren't ALSO pro-science and, in that, in fact, the also pro-science European Middle Ages benefited from them.

to:

*** All right, you are correct, but still : the European Middle Ages continued using the Ancients' proto-scientific method and perfected it into the modern scientific method (e.g. : creating the Universities : la Sorbonne, Bologne, Trantor). The original argument is still invalid :)
:) To clarify, my argument was not "the European Middle Ages were the best or even the first good, pro-science civilization ever". I was answering the argument : "The European Middle Ages was a bad, anti-science civilization". I think it is pretty easy to demonstrate the European Middle Ages was not an anti-science civilization. It does not mean that other civilization weren't ALSO pro-science and, in that, in fact, the also pro-science European Middle Ages benefited from them.
12th Dec '15 7:54:40 AM Thibaud
Is there an issue? Send a Message

Added DiffLines:

To clarify, my argument was not "the European Middle Ages were the best or even the first good, pro-science civilization ever". I was answering the argument : "The European Middle Ages was a bad, anti-science civilization". I think it is pretty easy to demonstrate the European Middle Ages was not an anti-science civilization. It does not mean that other civilization weren't ALSO pro-science and, in that, in fact, the also pro-science European Middle Ages benefited from them.
This list shows the last 10 events of 23. Show all.
http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/article_history.php?article=Headscratchers.Foundation