Follow TV Tropes

Following

History Headscratchers / Equilibrium

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


*** They wouldn't have to. I realize that while from a Doylist perspective it is technically a result of an editing error, in-universe that whole exchange with the trace was meant to give Preston a false sense of security, so it makes perfect sense that DuPont would go along with the framing in order to keep Preston from getting wise to the trap early.

to:

*** They wouldn't have to. I realize that while from a Doylist perspective it is technically a result of an editing error, in-universe that whole exchange with the trace was meant to give Preston a false sense of security, so it makes perfect sense that DuPont [=DuPont=] would go along with the framing in order to keep Preston from getting wise to the trap early.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Because [[ScrewTheRulesIMakeThem he is the boss]], and it's probable the other higher-ups are also hypocritical and sense offenders too.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Possible justification for gun-swap plothole

Added DiffLines:

****They wouldn't have to. I realize that while from a Doylist perspective it is technically a result of an editing error, in-universe that whole exchange with the trace was meant to give Preston a false sense of security, so it makes perfect sense that DuPont would go along with the framing in order to keep Preston from getting wise to the trap early.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Gun Kata

Added DiffLines:

** As a fighting style, it fits in perfectly with the ethos of the film. A martial 'art' utterly lacking in beauty, grace, or creativity, literally computer-generated, requiring nothing more than rote memorization of angles of attack and such. It's exactly the sort of thing a society of emotionless androids would come up with.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


*** Just because it's a trope doesn't mean it makes sense. TropesAreNotGood.

to:

*** Just because it's a trope doesn't mean it makes sense. TropesAreNotGood.Administrivia/TropesAreNotGood.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

*** It's also heavily implied that Preston feels empathy, despite being on Prozium early in the movie. It's what leads him to stop taking it.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


*** I always figured the society was like the dictatorship of San Lorenzo in Vonnegut's ''Cat's Cradle''. Bokonism is outlawed, the government ''kills'' people for practicing Bokonism, but EVREYONE on the island is a Bokonist.

to:

*** I always figured the society was like the dictatorship of San Lorenzo in Vonnegut's ''Cat's Cradle''. Bokonism is outlawed, the government ''kills'' people for practicing Bokonism, but EVREYONE EVERYONE on the island is a Bokonist.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Or, maybe, like in ''Literature/TheGiver'' and ''Literature/{{Son}}'', family groups are put together by the central government, with babies being born to birth mothers who aren't on Prozium (since medications can have adverse effects on fetuses) before being assigned to parents.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

*** Another theory is that on it's own Prozium doesn't ''completely'' do as advertised, otherwise there would be absolutely no need to destroy "emotional content" items, if it did you could throw a pride parade waving about Da Vincis and Rembrandts and the population on Prozium would have no reaction, it is possible it just dulls you to reacting to things, not outright supression, by destroying everything that makes the world interesting and a heavy dose of propaganda, it stops the populus from even having the chance to feel emotions properly and the slight twinges they do feel, they attribute as it being close to dose time, meaning they don't do the Miranda thing and just lay there and do nothing.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Or you just pair up with somebody who has a compatible work schedule and whose aptitudes for day-to-day activities (e.g. you're a competent cook and inept housekeeper, they're a competent housekeeper and inept cook) compliment your own.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* If all art is illegal in Libria, then how come DuPont gets to keep a huge Atlas statue in his office?

to:

* If all art is illegal in Libria, then how come DuPont Du Pont gets to keep a huge Atlas statue in his office?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* If all art is illegal in Libria, then how come DuPont gets to keep a huge Atlas statue in his office?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

** Then, there wasn't a rebellion waiting for their chance to overthrow the government, or a badass gunfighter who wanted to kick the ass of the people turning it on.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

*If turning off the Prozium for just a day is enough to take down Libria...how did it ever get turned on in the first place?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** He may be trained to spot all emotions...but the one he's probably got the most practice with is fear. (That's how he spots the clerk who sends him to Jurgen, after all.) His boss certainly isn't afraid of him. And while quite possibly the members of his immediate family ''should'' be afraid of him, it's not that implausible that they aren't.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Additionally, consider that the majority of the population has no practice controlling their emotions without the assistance of chemicals that, thanks to the factories being destroyed, are no longer available. Consider that the overthrow of a repressive government would be a time of chaos even if the above wasn't the case. Keeping in mind that at least some of that population consists of armed and trained combatants, at least a handful of which are ''really good'' at shooting and stabbing people, what are the odds that this this is going to be a smooth transition?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* At the very beginning. With [[Art/TheMonaLisa the Mona Lisa]]. These items are being destroyed for their emotional response. Which, in almost all cases, is the exact same from a copy of a painting as it is from the original, or at least from a copy in the same medium. So WHY do they need to check before burning that it's the original? It can't be for the satisfaction of a great victory 'cos, y'know... Prozium. Out-of-universe, it gives shock factor to the audience at the destruction of such a famous piece, but in-universe, well... [[ItJustBugsMe that]].

to:

* At the very beginning. With [[Art/TheMonaLisa the Mona Lisa]]. These items are being destroyed for their emotional response. Which, in almost all cases, is the exact same from a copy of a painting as it is from the original, or at least from a copy in the same medium. So WHY do they need to check before burning that it's the original? It can't be for the satisfaction of a great victory 'cos, y'know... Prozium. Out-of-universe, it gives shock factor to the audience at the destruction of such a famous piece, but in-universe, well... [[ItJustBugsMe [[Headscratchers/HomePage that]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* At the very beginning. With the Mona Lisa. These items are being destroyed for their emotional response. Which, in almost all cases, is the exact same from a copy of a painting as it is from the original, or at least from a copy in the same medium. So WHY do they need to check before burning that it's the original? It can't be for the satisfaction of a great victory 'cos, y'know... Prozium. Out-of-universe, it gives shock factor to the audience at the destruction of such a famous piece, but in-universe, well... [[ItJustBugsMe that]].

to:

* At the very beginning. With [[Art/TheMonaLisa the Mona Lisa.Lisa]]. These items are being destroyed for their emotional response. Which, in almost all cases, is the exact same from a copy of a painting as it is from the original, or at least from a copy in the same medium. So WHY do they need to check before burning that it's the original? It can't be for the satisfaction of a great victory 'cos, y'know... Prozium. Out-of-universe, it gives shock factor to the audience at the destruction of such a famous piece, but in-universe, well... [[ItJustBugsMe that]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Preston's rampage is one thing but the riot that breaks out afterwards? [[EsotericHappyEnding Hooray for wanton murder and property destruction!]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

**** They're not selfish bastards who are trying to escape, they're, well, La Résistance. That means they're trying to save the rest of the population. Hence why their efforts direct toward bringing emotional stuff to the city to awaken emotions in the population.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** RuleOfSymbolism, I'd imagine. Utilitarian = Comformity = Etc. Practically, though, it does seem ridiculous. You'd wind up with a populace suffering from some serious back problems within a generation of enforcing The Tiny Square Bed Act of Glorious Libria.

to:

** RuleOfSymbolism, I'd imagine. Utilitarian = Comformity Conformity = Etc. Practically, though, it does seem ridiculous. You'd wind up with a populace suffering from some serious back problems within a generation of enforcing The Tiny Square Bed Act of Glorious Libria.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Dangerously Genre Savvy is being merged with Genre Savvy. Misuse and zero context examples will be cut.


*** True, but the number of times people apply such [[HollywoodTactics one-dimensional tactical thinking in fiction]] does not make this particularly noticeable. The thing that ''is'' noticeable is that this is the only case where they depict characters who [[DangerouslyGenreSavvy actually devise a method of taking advantage of such oversights]].

to:

*** True, but the number of times people apply such [[HollywoodTactics one-dimensional tactical thinking in fiction]] does not make this particularly noticeable. The thing that ''is'' noticeable is that this is the only case where they depict characters who [[DangerouslyGenreSavvy actually devise a method of taking advantage of such oversights]].oversights.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


*** The potent image can easily be an ''in-universe'' explanation, too. It helps with the image the government projects, and it also requires people to follow a strict routine, enforcing discipline the same way a Marine Sergeant Major might [[GenerationKill bitch out Marines for having their shirts untucked]] when they're ostensibly doing more important things to prepare for an invasion.

to:

*** The potent image can easily be an ''in-universe'' explanation, too. It helps with the image the government projects, and it also requires people to follow a strict routine, enforcing discipline the same way a Marine Sergeant Major might [[GenerationKill [[Literature/GenerationKill bitch out Marines for having their shirts untucked]] when they're ostensibly doing more important things to prepare for an invasion.

Added: 196

Changed: 2

Removed: 196

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


*** Maybe they needed to verify that the painting was at least an accurate copy (including materials and technique), so that once it was destroyed, no one could use it to make other copies?

to:

*** Maybe they needed to verify that the painting was at least an accurate copy (including materials and technique), so that once it was destroyed, no one could use it to make other copies?copies.
** You will also notice they never use the device again for us to see. In my mind it was done for the audiences benefit to show how destoypian the society is. And will destroy great works of art.



** You will also notice they never use the device again for us to see. In my mind it was done for the audiences benefit to show how destoypian the society is. And will destroy great works of art.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** You will also notice they never use the device again for us to see. In my mind it was done for the audiences benefit to show how destoypian the society is. And will destroy great works of art.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

*** Maybe they needed to verify that the painting was at least an accurate copy (including materials and technique), so that once it was destroyed, no one could use it to make other copies?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** RuleOfSymbolism, I'd imagine. Utilitarian = Comformity = Ect. Practically, though, it does seem ridiculous. You'd wind up with a populace suffering from some serious back problems within a generation of enforcing The Tiny Square Bed Act of Glorious Libria.

to:

** RuleOfSymbolism, I'd imagine. Utilitarian = Comformity = Ect.Etc. Practically, though, it does seem ridiculous. You'd wind up with a populace suffering from some serious back problems within a generation of enforcing The Tiny Square Bed Act of Glorious Libria.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


*** Of course its not if it where Vulcan mind-melding everyone would be psychically connected.
*** The majority of the citizens in Libria are obviously on their meds, as evidenced by their overly stiff and conformist behavior (they always walk in perfectly straight lines, turn at right angles, and walk with deliberate focused precision). As for the expletive-shouting guards, as the above troper points out Prozium only ''suppresses'' emotions. If it totally destroyed a person's ability to feel emotions then there would be no need to outlaw and destroy objects of emotional value. If you're completely incapable of feeling anything then there's no danger in looking at the Mona Lisa, reading a book of poetry, or listening to Mozart.

to:

*** Of course its not it's not; if it where were Vulcan mind-melding mind-melding, everyone would be psychically connected.
*** The majority of the citizens in Libria are obviously on their meds, as evidenced by their overly stiff and conformist behavior (they always walk in perfectly straight lines, turn at right angles, and walk with deliberate focused precision). As for the expletive-shouting guards, as the above troper points out out, Prozium only ''suppresses'' emotions. If it totally destroyed a person's ability to feel emotions then there would be no need to outlaw and destroy objects of emotional value. If you're completely incapable of feeling anything then there's no danger in looking at the Mona Lisa, reading a book of poetry, or listening to Mozart.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

*** The focus of my question was the "closer to the city" part. Shouldn't the Resistance be constantly working to move further and further ''away'' from the city?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* GunKata. Just...GunKata. [[{{Futurama}} Gunfights do not work that way.]]

to:

* GunKata. Just...GunKata. [[{{Futurama}} [[{{WesternAnimation/Futurama}} Gunfights do not work that way.]]

Top