Follow TV Tropes

Following

History Headscratchers / Clue

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

** She was still an informant to the blackmailer.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* In the first and second endings, why did the murderer bother to kill the singing telegram girl? She had no direct connection to either of those suspects, and unlike the motorist, she hadn't actually come into the house, so she's had no chance to see or recognize the person she ''did'' have a connection to. If the killers from either of those two scenarios had just let her recite her singing-telegram message without interruption, she'd presumably have left to go on to the next address on her itinerary, none the wiser.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Amusingly, there ''is'' a bathroom in TheMovie, and it's even a plot point (being where Boddy's body is hidden). There's also a gag where Wadsworth accidentally soaks himself in the shower, having mistaken its knob for a doorknob in the dark.

to:

** Amusingly, there ''is'' a bathroom in TheMovie, and it's even a plot point (being where Boddy's body is hidden). There's also a gag where Wadsworth accidentally soaks himself in the shower, shower of a second bathroom, having mistaken its knob for a doorknob in the dark.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Amusingly, there ''is'' a bathroom in TheMovie, and it's even a plot point (being where Boddy's body is hidden).

to:

** Amusingly, there ''is'' a bathroom in TheMovie, and it's even a plot point (being where Boddy's body is hidden). There's also a gag where Wadsworth accidentally soaks himself in the shower, having mistaken its knob for a doorknob in the dark.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** FWIW, it was the ''cop'' who answered the call from J. Edgar Hoover, not Wadsworth.

to:

** FWIW, it was the ''cop'' who answered the call from J. Edgar Hoover, not Wadsworth.
Wadsworth. And given that the cop had just feigned a threat to arrest them all for murder ''just so they'd open the library door'', Wadsworth may have thought it was another bluff, to intimidate them into explaining why they'd locked him in there.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

** FWIW, it was the ''cop'' who answered the call from J. Edgar Hoover, not Wadsworth.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** The '''real''' question is, why didn't he come clean with the ''police officer'' while the two of them were alone in the dining room? Between the pair of them, they could've taken all the suspects into custody, prevented the last three murders, ''and'' taken [[spoiler: Wadsworth]] alive.

to:

** The '''real''' question is, why didn't he come clean with the ''police officer'' while the two of them were alone in the dining room? The cop wasn't a suspect, having arrived after Mr. Boddy and the cook were dead, and would have certainly assisted a federal agent upon request. Between the pair of them, they could've taken all the suspects into custody, prevented the last three murders, ''and'' taken [[spoiler: Wadsworth]] alive.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** He ''did'' have back-up on the way. All those feds and cops who arrive at the end weren't there for no reason; it was just a question of waiting until they'd taken up positions surrounding Hill House. Breaking cover prior to that wouldn't cause his fellow agents to arrive any faster, and could still afford him the chance to figure out who the killer was.

to:

** He ''did'' have back-up on the way. All those feds The cook's and cops who arrive at the end weren't there for no reason; it was just a question of waiting until they'd taken up positions surrounding Hill House. Breaking cover prior to Mr. Boddy's (apparent) death happen in such quick succession that wouldn't cause his fellow agents to arrive any faster, and could still afford him the Green had no chance to figure out who prevent them, whether he'd revealed himself or not. After that, events snowballed so quickly that he didn't have a good opportunity to assume command of the situation ... plus, there's no guarantee the others would've ''believed'' he was an FBI plant, as opposed to the killer was.
trying to bluff them all into a vulnerable position.
** The '''real''' question is, why didn't he come clean with the ''police officer'' while the two of them were alone in the dining room? Between the pair of them, they could've taken all the suspects into custody, prevented the last three murders, ''and'' taken [[spoiler: Wadsworth]] alive.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

** He ''did'' have back-up on the way. All those feds and cops who arrive at the end weren't there for no reason; it was just a question of waiting until they'd taken up positions surrounding Hill House. Breaking cover prior to that wouldn't cause his fellow agents to arrive any faster, and could still afford him the chance to figure out who the killer was.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* In book 6, chapter 6 ("Caught Blue-Handed"), Boddy stores his collection of rare and priceless ballroom dance records in a cabinet in the Ball Room, and then locks the doors, which the guest find out about and promptly go to a lot of effort to try and steal them. However, the solution reveals that they're not actually worth a dime. So why go to all the effort of hiding them?

to:

* In book 6, chapter 6 ("Caught Blue-Handed"), Boddy stores his collection of rare and priceless ballroom dance records in a cabinet in the Ball Room, and then locks the doors, which the guest guests find out about and promptly go to a lot of effort to try and steal them. However, the solution reveals that they're not actually worth a dime. So why go to all the effort of hiding them?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:



Added DiffLines:



Added DiffLines:



Added DiffLines:



Added DiffLines:



Added DiffLines:



Added DiffLines:



Added DiffLines:



Added DiffLines:



Added DiffLines:



Added DiffLines:



Added DiffLines:



Added DiffLines:



Added DiffLines:



Added DiffLines:



Added DiffLines:



Added DiffLines:



Added DiffLines:



Added DiffLines:



Added DiffLines:



Added DiffLines:



Added DiffLines:



Added DiffLines:



Added DiffLines:



Added DiffLines:



Added DiffLines:



Added DiffLines:



Added DiffLines:



Added DiffLines:



Added DiffLines:



Added DiffLines:

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

*** And possibly, if it's a scenario in which the killer is short, to mislead the others into thinking the culprit was taller.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* hOW

to:

* hOW

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

* hOW
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Wadsboddy didn't fire in the third ending. Green shot him and he dropped the revolver before he could squeeze the trigger.


** I have to assume this is sarcasm, since the answer is spelled out in the movie (and on the main page) but for the sake of completion: one shot fired at Boddy in the study, one hit the chandelier by accident, two at the lounge door, one for the singing telegram girl. And then the last one gets the second chandelier in the first ending only and is fired (but misses [[spoiler:Green]]) in the third ending.

to:

** I have to assume this is sarcasm, since the answer is spelled out in the movie (and on the main page) but for the sake of completion: one shot fired at Boddy in the study, one hit the chandelier by accident, two at the lounge door, one for the singing telegram girl. And then the last one gets the second chandelier in the first ending only and is fired (but misses [[spoiler:Green]]) in the third ending.only.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** It's not a closet, it's a walk-in freezer. It's possible the killer dragged her in there while she was dying. Perhaps the killer dragger her in there and *then* stabbed her. Or perhaps the killer waited until she was already in there, for whatever reason, and killed her then. Also, Peacock and Mustard alone are able to hold the cook's body upright during the fake dance scene, so it's not that one person *couldn't* carry her, but it was easier for four to do it, especially to pick her up off the floor.

to:

** It's not a closet, it's a walk-in freezer. It's possible the killer dragged her in there while she was dying. Perhaps the killer dragger dragged her in there and *then* stabbed her. Or perhaps the killer waited until she was already in there, for whatever reason, and killed her then. Also, Peacock and Mustard alone are able to hold the cook's body upright during the fake dance scene, so it's not that one person *couldn't* carry her, but it was easier for four to do it, especially to pick her up off the floor.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


*** That's what I always considered to be the answer too. However, there is one other point to consider, which could either support or undermine your case: [[spoiler:the scene in the study where all the guests are revealing their secrets. When the time comes for Mr. Green to be unmasked, he pre-empts TheReveal from Wadsworth and states his homosexuality. After this, we see a scene of Wadsworth staring bug-eyed at the letter from Mr. Boddy and then, it appears, ''shifting the relevant page underneath the stack, unread''.]] While in the first two endings this makes sense, because Wadsworth may not have known all the secrets (being both a butler and an FBI agent) and Mr. Green really was gay in them, in the third ending [[spoiler:you would think Mr. Boddy would know better than to shift the page aside unread, ''especially'' if he didn't actually know all the secrets firsthand nor had met his victims face-to-face. Nor does he seem the type to be that appalled or startled by such a secret.]] So either [[spoiler:Mr. Boddy was feigning his shock in order to fool his victims, knew about the secret, but had been fooled himself into believing Green was the genuine article]], or [[spoiler:he hadn't yet been told what the secret was by Green's informant (the Jehovah's Witness, since as Green's boss he would know him and Wadsworth didn't seem surprised by his appearance in any of the endings?), and the information was so shocking he moved the page aside unread, thus being fooled because he didn't bother to check the credentials.]] The latter hardly seems in character, unless he's just that arrogant, so it must have been the former...

to:

*** That's what I always considered to be the answer too. However, there is one other point to consider, which could either support or undermine your case: [[spoiler:the scene in the study where all the guests are revealing their secrets. When the time comes for Mr. Green to be unmasked, he pre-empts TheReveal from Wadsworth and states his homosexuality. After this, we see a scene of Wadsworth staring bug-eyed at the letter from Mr. Boddy and then, it appears, ''shifting the relevant page underneath the stack, unread''.]] While in the first two endings this makes sense, because Wadsworth may not have known all the secrets (being both a butler and an FBI agent) and Mr. Green really was gay in them, in the third ending [[spoiler:you would think Mr. Boddy would know better than to shift the page aside unread, ''especially'' if he didn't actually know all the secrets firsthand nor had met his victims face-to-face. Nor does he seem the type to be that appalled or startled by such a secret.]] So either [[spoiler:Mr. Boddy was feigning his shock in order to fool his victims, knew about the secret, but had been fooled himself into believing Green was the genuine article]], or [[spoiler:he hadn't yet been told what the secret was by Green's informant (the Jehovah's Witness, Evangelist, since as Green's boss he would know him and Wadsworth didn't seem surprised by his appearance in any of the endings?), and the information was so shocking he moved the page aside unread, thus being fooled because he didn't bother to check the credentials.]] The latter hardly seems in character, unless he's just that arrogant, so it must have been the former...

Added: 272

Changed: 249

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** This is a relic from the unreleased Fourth Ending. In that ending, Plum's antagonism with Mrs. Peacock was manufactured and the two are secretly working together to take down Boddy. Peacock gave him information about the secret passage, which she learned from the Cook.




to:

** In the original game, Plum was established to be a college professor. The movie likely held onto the name for the sake of recognition, even though the character's backstory changed.



** It seems to be a combination of Mr. Boddy's childish naivity when it comes to his friends (one story has him thrilled to have the company of several of his friends, and then some time later wonders why they broke in through the window in the middle of the night) and them having just enough PetTheDog moments to be likable.

to:

** It seems to be a combination of Mr. Boddy's childish naivity naivete when it comes to his friends (one story has him thrilled to have the company of several of his friends, and then some time later wonders why they broke in through the window in the middle of the night) and them having just enough PetTheDog moments to be likable.




to:

** Sentimental value? Maybe Boddy's just really into vinyl.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* In book 6, chapter 2, it's said that a demolition crew came and planted a huge bomb in one of the nine downstairs rooms so the mansion could be blown up the next day to make way for a huge golf course, leaving a message for Mr. Boddy with one of his guests on their way out to let him know that he had a day to clear out. And yet, Boddy was completely unaware of this until he heard about it from an article in the newspaper. ''How in the heck'' did whomever was responsible for this get away with it? Because even if the laws of eminent domain came into play, they should have notified the land's owner well in advance of the whole thing, and it's clear that never happened.

to:

* In book 6, chapter 2, 2 ("A Dynamite Dinner"), it's said that a demolition crew came and planted a huge bomb in one of the nine downstairs rooms so the mansion could be blown up the next day to make way for a huge golf course, leaving a message for Mr. Boddy with one of his guests on their way out to let him know that he had a day to clear out. And yet, Boddy was completely unaware of this until he heard about it from an article in the newspaper. ''How in the heck'' did whomever was responsible for this get away with it? Because even if the laws of eminent domain came into play, they should have notified the land's owner well in advance of the whole thing, and it's clear that never happened.
* In book 6, chapter 6 ("Caught Blue-Handed"), Boddy stores his collection of rare and priceless ballroom dance records in a cabinet in the Ball Room, and then locks the doors, which the guest find out about and promptly go to a lot of effort to try and steal them. However, the solution reveals that they're not actually worth a dime. So why go to all the effort of hiding them?

Added: 677

Changed: 2

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


*** MoneyDearBoy. It has been mentioned that they're all in his will

to:

*** MoneyDearBoy. It has been mentioned that they're all in his willwill.
* In book 6, chapter 2, it's said that a demolition crew came and planted a huge bomb in one of the nine downstairs rooms so the mansion could be blown up the next day to make way for a huge golf course, leaving a message for Mr. Boddy with one of his guests on their way out to let him know that he had a day to clear out. And yet, Boddy was completely unaware of this until he heard about it from an article in the newspaper. ''How in the heck'' did whomever was responsible for this get away with it? Because even if the laws of eminent domain came into play, they should have notified the land's owner well in advance of the whole thing, and it's clear that never happened.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

* Minor nitpick for both the Movie and Game. If the UNO WHO occupation and psychiatrist occupation for Professor Plum is true, why exactly is he called PROFESSOR Plum? Should it not be Doctor Plum? He has a PhD, presumably, so he would be a doctor. He does not teach at a college campus though, and has never been mentioned to do so. He's also never been mentioned to teach at a campus before in any other iteration of a game, last time I checked.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

*** Green's implication that he was never really a homosexual bears out the theory that the FBI deliberately leaked false information to Boddy in the hopes that he would take the bait and attempt to extort Green. The "informant" who provided this false information to Boddy could well have been [[spoiler:the evangelist]], who, as stated above, would have been in a great position to know if Green was gay (and thus seemed like a reliable source to Boddy or his informants). The ploy worked, and Green used this identity as a "victim" to continue gathering information on Boddy's informants before they made an arrest. [[spoiler: The evangelist]] would have then been invited to the party along with all the other informants, which is why Wadworth wasn't surprised to see him...[[spoiler:and Green, who knew the evangelist would turn up, played along with the others to maintain cover.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

**** The letter they all received stated that "Mr. Boddy will bring to an end a certain long-standing, confidential, and painful financial liability," so each of them went into the dinner party knowing their blackmailing finally be over.
*** It may be that none of them knew beforehand that all the ''others'' were victims of the same blackmailer--for all they knew, the dinner party was just a cover and at some point in the evening, Mr. Boddy would approach them privately. They began to suspect something more was afoot during dinner, when they realized all the guests were connected in some way or another...but with no way to be certain, the smartest thing for each of them was to keep quiet and see where all this was going, since it could still be coincidence (everyone in D.C. knows one another, after all). Certainly a few people were getting nervous enough to ask what's going on during dinner. Immediately after dinner, Wadsworth straight-up told them what was going on. From the time of their arrivals to the moment Wadsworth spilled the beans was perhaps (in universe) an hour--not a lot of time to form an opinion, certainly not enough time to trust a stranger enough to ask "yo, are you being blackmailed, too?"
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** (The obvious answer is that if [[spoiler:Wadsworth/Mr. Green]] jumped out a window and the cops stormed in after the first murder, the movie would have been only twenty minutes long. The meta-answer is that whatever character jumps out the window is instantly exempted from being the murderer, which potentially ruins one of the three endings. ''But still!'')

Added: 718

Changed: 17

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


*** Except that back-up ''was'' available--[[spoiler:the door-to-door evangelist was the Chief, and the moment the group steps outside, G-men and police leap out of the bushes to surround them.]]



** For that matter, why would J. Edgar Hoover himself call the house in which there was an ongoing undercover investigation? Finding out that the head of the FBI so much as knew his telephone number might cause even the most hardened criminal to give up his plans and flee, possibly after murdering the rest of the guests. (And even if it ''wasn't'' the real Hoover, but another senior agent who gave that name as an alias...really, you'd think the FBI could come up with a better, less immediately-identifiable codename.)



** 1. The cop ''was'' invited. Wadsworth said that everyone had been invited there. He wore his uniform perhaps because he was uncertain what would happen and a uniform is really a cop's best (psychological) weapon. Really, who's to say? 2. "They" was the people who had seen the photo of Yvette as a prostitute, ''in flagrante delecto'' with Col. Mustard. 3. Whether there is a "real" ending depends on what version you watch, but in that ''particular'' ending Wadsworth obviously found it to his advantage not to be the actual killer of anyone, in case there was legal trouble.

to:

** 1. The cop ''was'' invited. Wadsworth said that everyone had been invited there. He wore his uniform perhaps because he was uncertain what would happen and a uniform is really a cop's best (psychological) weapon. Really, who's to say? 2. "They" was the people who had seen the photo of Yvette as a prostitute, ''in flagrante delecto'' with Col. Mustard. 3. Whether there is a "real" ending depends on what version you watch, but in that ''particular'' ending Wadsworth obviously found it to his advantage not to be the actual killer of anyone, in case there was legal trouble.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** He might not have been immediately able to. By the very nature of the job, undercover operatives generally don't have quick access to back-up, since having a whole bunch of FBI agents lurking around would potentially spook the people he was going undercover on. Back-up might not have been immediately available to him and if he'd revealed his cover there might not have been anything stopping the others from murdering ''him'' to silence him before getting the hell out of there, meaning that he wouldn't have had much choice but to keep up his cover despite the bodies dropping around him if he wanted to figure out what was going on.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Editing to elaborate on when Professor Plum and Mrs. Peacock are first shown in the scene where the cook's body is discovered rather than making another bullet point restating what I said.


*** Except that [[spoiler: both Professor Plum and Mrs. Peacock]] are in the kitchen with the others in the beginning of the scene where the cook's corpse is found. So either the killer used the secret passage while most everyone else was gathered around the cook, or just slipped out of the kitchen and hurried back to the study. The latter scenario might be simpler and less risky than going through the secret passage, except Wadsworth never says anything about Mr. Boddy's murder in the second and third endings that contradicts what he says about it during TheSummation, so the murderer must have used the kitchen/study passage. Perhaps everyone was too distracted by the cook's body to notice the killer going into the secret passage (it's worth mentioning that the conservatory/lounge passage opens without making a sound during the scene where the motorist is killed, presumably because he's too focused on his phone call to notice any noise being made), but my question of how [[spoiler: Professor Plum]] knew about the passage still stands.

to:

*** Except that [[spoiler: both Professor Plum and Mrs. Peacock]] are ''are'' in the kitchen with the others in the beginning of the scene where the cook's corpse is found.found--they're standing on the stairs with Colonel Mustard, Miss Scarlet, and Mrs. White as Mr. Green has a look around the room. So either the killer used the secret passage while most everyone else was gathered around the cook, or just slipped out of the kitchen and hurried back to the study. The latter scenario might be simpler and less risky than going through the secret passage, except Wadsworth never says anything about Mr. Boddy's murder in the second and third endings that contradicts what he says about it during TheSummation, so the murderer must have used the kitchen/study passage. Perhaps everyone was too distracted by the cook's body to notice the killer going into the secret passage (it's worth mentioning that the conservatory/lounge passage opens without making a sound during the scene where the motorist is killed, presumably because he's too focused on his phone call to notice any noise being made), but my question of how [[spoiler: Professor Plum]] knew about the passage still stands.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

**** It is noteworthy that Professor Plum and Mrs. Peacock are not shown in the kitchen until sometime into the scene, after Colonel Mustard accuses Mrs. White and then suddenly realizes who had the dagger; prior to this the scene conspicuously shows only Green, Mustard, Scarlet, and White gathered around the Cook's body, and when Mustard turns to demand answers from Wadsworth he is standing alone by the banister near the kitchen door. So there was plenty of time for one of them to have either gone through the passage or down the hall to the study, then return only near the end of the kitchen scene. (Presumably in the third ending Plum must have either gone through the passage or hidden somewhere in the hall until Mrs. Peacock recovered enough to make it to the kitchen, or else she'd have been there to witness him killing Mr. Boddy.) How Plum would know about the passage indeed makes no sense...so I think this is an artifact of the script being written with contradictions to allow for different endings. The secret passage was included as a MythologyGag and works for the other two endings via Yvette and the Cook; the third ending probably didn't use the secret passage at all, but the dialogue had to stay to explain the first two endings, so...
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Possibly he'd been sent in with explicit orders to neutralize the security threat posed by Mr. Boddy's blackmail materials - materials, which might have included dirty laundry on other government personnel not present - no matter the cost. He had to keep playing along until he either found the whole stash, or the blackmailer was indisputably confirmed dead. And he couldn't be sure that ''Yvette'' wasn't in on Mr. Boddy's scheme: she'd been recording the incriminating conversation in the study, after all.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Communication with the outside world has largely been cut,

Top