Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
** This in itself is Fridge: Time is both the creator and the destroyer of the universe every second, so naturally it, or rather he, is both the problem and the solution as well.
Changed line(s) 25 (click to see context) from:
to:
* The title of the book: Not only is Lobsang the titular "thief of time," it can also refer to how the Auditors are scheming to break the universe and steal everyone else's (life)time. Plus, Death plays a big role in this book. And one of his titles is "Thief of Time," as well. ''Brilliant.''
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 15 (click to see context) from:
* At the very beginning, Death watches the birth and wonders if that's what the problem was, or what the solution is going to be. The following exchange occurs: "[[AC:[[TheUnintelligible Squeak.]]]]" "[[AC:Quite so. You may very well be right.]]" Only during the second reading, one can understand what the Death of Rats meant: [[spoiler: "Both."]]
to:
* At the very beginning, Death watches the birth and wonders if that's what the problem was, or what the solution is going to be. The following exchange occurs: "[[AC:[[TheUnintelligible Squeak.]]]]" "[[AC:Quite so. You may very well be right.]]" Only during the second reading, one can understand what the Death of Rats meant: [[spoiler: "Both."]]"
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Removing spoiler tags from the page, as per Spoilers Off policy. Added a courtesy warning to the top of the page.
Changed line(s) 11 (click to see context) from:
to:
'''As a Fridge subpage, all spoilers are unmarked [[Administrivia/SpoilersOff as per policy.]] Administrivia/YouHaveBeenWarned.'''
----
----
Changed line(s) 15 (click to see context) from:
* It's also FridgeBrilliance that Death only saw Wen fetching Nanny Ogg, not the actual birth. Not only does this conceal the fact that [[spoiler: Lobsang and Jeremy are the same person]], but it also hides how [[spoiler: Death, himself, can't actually ''see'' Lobsang.]]
to:
* It's also FridgeBrilliance that Death only saw Wen fetching Nanny Ogg, not the actual birth. Not only does this conceal the fact that [[spoiler: Lobsang and Jeremy are the same person]], person, but it also hides how [[spoiler: Death, himself, can't actually ''see'' Lobsang.]]
Changed line(s) 17 (click to see context) from:
* Meta-example: When you read ''Night Watch'', then go back to ''Thief of Time'' and realize that the entire section which occurs while time is stopped was happening simultaneously with [[spoiler: Vimes' and Carcer's jump back to the past]].
to:
* Meta-example: When you read ''Night Watch'', then go back to ''Thief of Time'' and realize that the entire section which occurs while time is stopped was happening simultaneously with [[spoiler: Vimes' and Carcer's jump back to the past]].past.
Changed line(s) 23,24 (click to see context) from:
* When Miss Tangerine, [[spoiler: one of the auditors who created human bodies for themselves,]] tries to prevent more confusion in their ranks, caused by [[LogicBomb very... contradictory and, sometimes, existential signs]], she starts to refer to these signs as "bloody stupid", therefore, not to be obeyed at all. Now, a human could recognize a cuss word, but how would [[spoiler: a literal-minded auditor]]? Easy. Before, the worst word she could think of was an "organ", because of their messiness and untidiness, and she used it as a heavy expletive. But blood is also a part of biological processes, in fact, a very important one. So, she used "bloody" to swear [[spoiler: not as a human would, but because she was generally disgusted with human bodies and all that made them [[ArcWords tick]].]]
to:
* When Miss Tangerine, [[spoiler: one of the auditors Auditors who created human bodies for themselves,]] themselves, tries to prevent more confusion in their ranks, caused by [[LogicBomb very... contradictory and, sometimes, existential signs]], she starts to refer to these signs as "bloody stupid", therefore, not to be obeyed at all. Now, a human could recognize a cuss word, but how would [[spoiler: a literal-minded auditor]]? Auditor? Easy. Before, the worst word she could think of was an "organ", because of their messiness and untidiness, and she used it as a heavy expletive. But blood is also a part of biological processes, in fact, a very important one. So, she used "bloody" to swear [[spoiler: not as a human would, but because she was generally disgusted with human bodies and all that made them [[ArcWords tick]].]]
tick]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 20 (click to see context) from:
* Death shows Susan how the History Monks move excess time around by using the PhlebotinumAnalogy of pulling out the table-cloth from beneath table settings. The ever-exact Susan points out the flaw in his analogy by pointing out how Death knocked over the salt shaker, and that there are still stains from the last meal on the tablecloth. As Death observes, these actually further the analogy: manipulating time isn't an exact science, and it leaves subtle signs and inconsistencies behind that people can notice if they're paying attention (and [[WeirdnessCensor most ordinary folks on the Discworld aren't paying that much attention]]). In Reaper Man Death's dart throwing was perfect unless he made very precise deliberate mistakes. The knocked over salt shaker was actually ''supposed'' to happen as part of the analogy. Not to mention the signs and inconsistencies in question are actually a meta explanation for some of the Discworld's Continuity errors, which, indeed, are usually only noticed if the readers pay attention.
to:
* Death shows uses a TableclothYank to explain to Susan how the History Monks move excess manipulate the time around by using of the PhlebotinumAnalogy of pulling out the table-cloth from beneath table settings. The ever-exact universe to resolve problems. When Susan points out the flaw in his analogy by pointing out how Death knocked over that he spilled the salt shaker, and that there are still stains from the last meal left on the tablecloth. As cloth, Death observes, these actually further takes pride in the analogy: effectiveness of the metaphor: manipulating time isn't an exact science, and it leaves subtle signs and inconsistencies behind that people can notice if they're paying attention (and [[WeirdnessCensor most ordinary folks on the Discworld aren't paying that much attention]]). In Reaper Man Death's attention]]).
** If you read ''Literature/ReaperMan'' and recall that how Death deliberately throws off a dartthrowing was perfect unless he made very precise deliberate mistakes.game to endear himself to the villagers, it becomes apparent that Death specifically pulled the cloth such that the salt would spill and everything else would be fine. The knocked over salt shaker was actually ''supposed'' to happen as part of the analogy.
*** Not to mention the signs and inconsistencies in question are actually a meta explanation for some of the Discworld's Continuity errors, which, indeed, are usually only noticed if the readers pay attention.
** If you read ''Literature/ReaperMan'' and recall that how Death deliberately throws off a dart
*** Not to mention the signs and inconsistencies in question are actually a meta explanation for some of the Discworld's Continuity errors, which, indeed, are usually only noticed if the readers pay attention.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 16 (click to see context) from:
* How do Susan and Myria/Unity kill Auditors by the score? Chocolate. You might consider it, even, a genocidal tactic. Back in ''Discworld/SoulMusic'', what did Susan's inner monologue name as her mother's favorite dish? Genocide by Chocolate.
to:
* How do Susan and Myria/Unity kill Auditors by the score? Chocolate. You might consider it, even, a genocidal tactic. Back in ''Discworld/SoulMusic'', ''Literature/SoulMusic'', what did Susan's inner monologue name as her mother's favorite dish? Genocide by Chocolate.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 20 (click to see context) from:
* Death shows Susan how the History Monks move excess time around by using the PhlebotinumAnalogy of pulling out the table-cloth from beneath table settings. The ever-exact Susan points out the flaw in his analogy by pointing out how Death knocked over the salt shaker, and that there are still stains from the last meal on the tablecloth. As Death observes, these actually further the analogy: manipulating time isn't an exact science, and it leaves subtle signs and inconsistencies behind that people can notice if they're paying attention (and [[WeirdnessCensor most ordinary folks on the Discworld aren't paying that much attention]]). In Reaper Man Death's dart throwing was perfect unless he made very precise deliberate mistakes. The knocked over salt shaker was actually ''supposed'' to happen as part of the Analogy Not to mention the signs and inconsistencies in question are actually a meta explanation for some of the Discworld's Continuity errors, which, indeed, are usually only noticed if the readers pay attention.
to:
* Death shows Susan how the History Monks move excess time around by using the PhlebotinumAnalogy of pulling out the table-cloth from beneath table settings. The ever-exact Susan points out the flaw in his analogy by pointing out how Death knocked over the salt shaker, and that there are still stains from the last meal on the tablecloth. As Death observes, these actually further the analogy: manipulating time isn't an exact science, and it leaves subtle signs and inconsistencies behind that people can notice if they're paying attention (and [[WeirdnessCensor most ordinary folks on the Discworld aren't paying that much attention]]). In Reaper Man Death's dart throwing was perfect unless he made very precise deliberate mistakes. The knocked over salt shaker was actually ''supposed'' to happen as part of the Analogy analogy. Not to mention the signs and inconsistencies in question are actually a meta explanation for some of the Discworld's Continuity errors, which, indeed, are usually only noticed if the readers pay attention.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 21,22 (click to see context) from:
* When Miss Tangerine, [[spoiler: one of the auditors who created human bodies for themselves,]] tries to prevent more confusion in their ranks, caused by [[LogicBomb very... contradictory and, sometimes, existential signs]], she starts to refer to these signs as "bloody stupid", therefore, not to be obeyed at all. Now, a human could recognize a cuss word, but how would [[spoiler: a literal-minded auditor]]? Easy. Before, the worst word she could think of was an "organ", because of their messiness and untidiness, and she used it as a heavy expletive. But blood is also a part of biological processes, in fact, a very important one. So, she used "bloody" to swear [[spoiler: not as a human would, but because she was generally disgusted with human bodies and all that made them [[ArcWord tick]].]]
to:
* When Miss Tangerine, [[spoiler: one of the auditors who created human bodies for themselves,]] tries to prevent more confusion in their ranks, caused by [[LogicBomb very... contradictory and, sometimes, existential signs]], she starts to refer to these signs as "bloody stupid", therefore, not to be obeyed at all. Now, a human could recognize a cuss word, but how would [[spoiler: a literal-minded auditor]]? Easy. Before, the worst word she could think of was an "organ", because of their messiness and untidiness, and she used it as a heavy expletive. But blood is also a part of biological processes, in fact, a very important one. So, she used "bloody" to swear [[spoiler: not as a human would, but because she was generally disgusted with human bodies and all that made them [[ArcWord [[ArcWords tick]].]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 4 (click to see context) from:
%% This isn't Troper Tales or a forum. Refrain from first person entries, speculation, and "replying" to entries. RepairDontRespond is in effect here as much as any other page.
to:
%% This isn't Troper Tales or a forum. Refrain from first person entries, speculation, and "replying" to entries. RepairDontRespond Administrivia/RepairDontRespond is in effect here as much as any other page.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 21,22 (click to see context) from:
* When Miss Tangerine, [[spoiler: one of the auditors who created human bodies for themselves,]] tries to prevent more confusion in their ranks, caused by [[LogicBomb very... contradictory and, sometimes, existential signs]], she starts to refer to these signs as "bloody stupid", therefore, not to be obeyed at all. Now, a human could recognize a cuss word, but how would [[spoiler: a literal-minded auditor]]? Easy. Before, the worst word she could think of was an "organ", because of their messiness and untidiness, and used it as a heavy expletive. But blood is also a part of biological processes, in fact, a very important one. So, she used "bloody" to swear [[spoiler: not as a human would, but because she was generally disgusted with human bodies and all that made them [[ArcWord tick]].]]
to:
* When Miss Tangerine, [[spoiler: one of the auditors who created human bodies for themselves,]] tries to prevent more confusion in their ranks, caused by [[LogicBomb very... contradictory and, sometimes, existential signs]], she starts to refer to these signs as "bloody stupid", therefore, not to be obeyed at all. Now, a human could recognize a cuss word, but how would [[spoiler: a literal-minded auditor]]? Easy. Before, the worst word she could think of was an "organ", because of their messiness and untidiness, and she used it as a heavy expletive. But blood is also a part of biological processes, in fact, a very important one. So, she used "bloody" to swear [[spoiler: not as a human would, but because she was generally disgusted with human bodies and all that made them [[ArcWord tick]].]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 21 (click to see context) from:
to:
* When Miss Tangerine, [[spoiler: one of the auditors who created human bodies for themselves,]] tries to prevent more confusion in their ranks, caused by [[LogicBomb very... contradictory and, sometimes, existential signs]], she starts to refer to these signs as "bloody stupid", therefore, not to be obeyed at all. Now, a human could recognize a cuss word, but how would [[spoiler: a literal-minded auditor]]? Easy. Before, the worst word she could think of was an "organ", because of their messiness and untidiness, and used it as a heavy expletive. But blood is also a part of biological processes, in fact, a very important one. So, she used "bloody" to swear [[spoiler: not as a human would, but because she was generally disgusted with human bodies and all that made them [[ArcWord tick]].]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 20,23 (click to see context) from:
* Death shows Susan how the History Monks move excess time around by using the PhlebotinumAnalogy of pulling out the table-cloth from beneath table settings. The ever-exact Susan points out the flaw in his analogy by pointing out how Death knocked over the salt shaker, and that there are still stains from the last meal on the tablecloth. As Death observes, these actually further the analogy: manipulating time isn't an exact science, and it leaves subtle signs and inconsistencies behind that people can notice if they're paying attention (and [[WeirdnessCensor most ordinary folks on the Discworld aren't paying that much attention]]).
** In Reaper Man Death's dart throwing was perfect unless he made very precise deliberate mistakes. The knocked over salt shaker was actually ''supposed'' to happen as part of the Analogy
** Not to mention the signs and inconsistencies in question are actually a meta explanation for some of the Discworld's Continuity errors, which, indeed, are usually only noticed if the readers pay attention.
** In Reaper Man Death's dart throwing was perfect unless he made very precise deliberate mistakes. The knocked over salt shaker was actually ''supposed'' to happen as part of the Analogy
** Not to mention the signs and inconsistencies in question are actually a meta explanation for some of the Discworld's Continuity errors, which, indeed, are usually only noticed if the readers pay attention.
to:
* Death shows Susan how the History Monks move excess time around by using the PhlebotinumAnalogy of pulling out the table-cloth from beneath table settings. The ever-exact Susan points out the flaw in his analogy by pointing out how Death knocked over the salt shaker, and that there are still stains from the last meal on the tablecloth. As Death observes, these actually further the analogy: manipulating time isn't an exact science, and it leaves subtle signs and inconsistencies behind that people can notice if they're paying attention (and [[WeirdnessCensor most ordinary folks on the Discworld aren't paying that much attention]]).
**attention]]). In Reaper Man Death's dart throwing was perfect unless he made very precise deliberate mistakes. The knocked over salt shaker was actually ''supposed'' to happen as part of the Analogy
**Analogy Not to mention the signs and inconsistencies in question are actually a meta explanation for some of the Discworld's Continuity errors, which, indeed, are usually only noticed if the readers pay attention.
**
**
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 21 (click to see context) from:
to:
** In Reaper Man Death's dart throwing was perfect unless he made very precise deliberate mistakes. The knocked over salt shaker was actually ''supposed'' to happen as part of the Analogy
** Not to mention the signs and inconsistencies in question are actually a meta explanation for some of the Discworld's Continuity errors, which, indeed, are usually only noticed if the readers pay attention.
** Not to mention the signs and inconsistencies in question are actually a meta explanation for some of the Discworld's Continuity errors, which, indeed, are usually only noticed if the readers pay attention.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 20 (click to see context) from:
to:
* Death shows Susan how the History Monks move excess time around by using the PhlebotinumAnalogy of pulling out the table-cloth from beneath table settings. The ever-exact Susan points out the flaw in his analogy by pointing out how Death knocked over the salt shaker, and that there are still stains from the last meal on the tablecloth. As Death observes, these actually further the analogy: manipulating time isn't an exact science, and it leaves subtle signs and inconsistencies behind that people can notice if they're paying attention (and [[WeirdnessCensor most ordinary folks on the Discworld aren't paying that much attention]]).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
%%
%%
%%
%% This isn't Troper Tales or a forum. Refrain from first person entries, speculation, and "replying" to entries. RepairDontRespond is in effect here as much as any other page.
%%
%%
%% Fridge that demands an answer goes on the Headscratchers tab.
%% If you want to add a fridge example that needs an answer, or see a fridge example you want to answer, move it over to Headscratchers.
%%
%%
%%
%%
%% This isn't Troper Tales or a forum. Refrain from first person entries, speculation, and "replying" to entries. RepairDontRespond is in effect here as much as any other page.
%%
%%
%% Fridge that demands an answer goes on the Headscratchers tab.
%% If you want to add a fridge example that needs an answer, or see a fridge example you want to answer, move it over to Headscratchers.
%%
%%
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1,6 (click to see context) from:
[[AC: FridgeBrilliance: ]]
At the very beginning, Death watches the birth and wonders if that's what the problem was, or what the solution is going to be. A following exchange occurs:
->Death of Rats: [[AC:[[TheUnintelligible Squeak.]]]]
->Death: [[AC:Quite so. You may very well be right.]]
* Only during the second reading, one can understand what the Death of Rats meant: [[spoiler: "Both."]]
** Or [[spoiler: [[MathematiciansAnswer "Yes."]]]]
At the very beginning, Death watches the birth and wonders if that's what the problem was, or what the solution is going to be. A following exchange occurs:
->Death of Rats: [[AC:[[TheUnintelligible Squeak.]]]]
->Death: [[AC:Quite so. You may very well be right.]]
* Only during the second reading, one can understand what the Death of Rats meant: [[spoiler: "Both."]]
** Or [[spoiler: [[MathematiciansAnswer "Yes."]]]]
to:
* At the very beginning, Death watches the birth and wonders if that's what the problem was, or what the solution is going to be.
->Death of Rats: [[AC:[[TheUnintelligible
->Death: [[AC:Quite
*
** Or [[spoiler: [[MathematiciansAnswer "Yes."]]]]
Changed line(s) 12,14 (click to see context) from:
[[AC: FridgeLogic: ]]
* It's implied that Jeremy attacked a clockmaker because he set his clock five minutes fast. Seems legit. But it's also established that Jeremy owns a watch that runs about five seconds fast, so that he and other people are warned to cover their ears when his other clocks chime the hour. Given how many clocks he has and how accurate they are, also legit. But isn't keeping a watch set five seconds fast hypocritical after attacking someone who set it fast as well?
** I've always interpreted that as his ''alarm'' being set early. Like 7:59 instead of 8:00. As long as it's telling time accurately and going off at the correct time, Jeremy's okay with it.
* It's implied that Jeremy attacked a clockmaker because he set his clock five minutes fast. Seems legit. But it's also established that Jeremy owns a watch that runs about five seconds fast, so that he and other people are warned to cover their ears when his other clocks chime the hour. Given how many clocks he has and how accurate they are, also legit. But isn't keeping a watch set five seconds fast hypocritical after attacking someone who set it fast as well?
** I've always interpreted that as his ''alarm'' being set early. Like 7:59 instead of 8:00. As long as it's telling time accurately and going off at the correct time, Jeremy's okay with it.
to:
* It's implied that Jeremy attacked a clockmaker because he set his clock five minutes fast. Seems legit. But it's also established that Jeremy owns a watch that runs about five seconds fast, so that he and other people are warned to cover their ears when his other clocks chime
!!FridgeLogic
On the
** I've always interpreted that as his ''alarm'' being set early. Like 7:59 instead of 8:00. As long as it's telling time accurately and going off at the correct time, Jeremy's okay with it.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* Lu-Tze and Lobsang can still see when they're time-slicing, even though they're moving fast enough that light in front and back of them is shifted towards the ends of the color spectrum. In an earlier book, it's mentioned that Discworld also has something called "meta-light", which allows darkness to be seen; perhaps that's what lets the pair of them see even when they're outrunning the normal light around them.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Deleted line(s) 8 (click to see context) :
Deleted line(s) 10 (click to see context) :
Changed line(s) 12 (click to see context) from:
* Lu-Tze claims that the word "ninja" is Agatean for "the breaking wind". In other words, they're silent but deadly.
to:
* Lu-Tze claims that the word "ninja" is Agatean for "the breaking wind".Passing Wind". In other words, they're silent but deadly.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 14 (click to see context) from:
* It's implied that Jeremy attacked a clockmaker because he set his clock five minutes fast. Seems legit. But it's also established that Jeremy owns a watch that runs about five seconds fast, so that he and other people are warned to cover their ears when his other clocks chime the hour. Given how many clocks he has and how accurate they are, also legit. But isn't keeping a watch set five seconds fast hypocritical after attacking someone who set it fast as well?
to:
* It's implied that Jeremy attacked a clockmaker because he set his clock five minutes fast. Seems legit. But it's also established that Jeremy owns a watch that runs about five seconds fast, so that he and other people are warned to cover their ears when his other clocks chime the hour. Given how many clocks he has and how accurate they are, also legit. But isn't keeping a watch set five seconds fast hypocritical after attacking someone who set it fast as well?well?
** I've always interpreted that as his ''alarm'' being set early. Like 7:59 instead of 8:00. As long as it's telling time accurately and going off at the correct time, Jeremy's okay with it.
** I've always interpreted that as his ''alarm'' being set early. Like 7:59 instead of 8:00. As long as it's telling time accurately and going off at the correct time, Jeremy's okay with it.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 12 (click to see context) from:
* Lu-Tze claims that the word "ninja" is Agatean for "the breaking wind". In other words, they're silent but deadly.
to:
* Lu-Tze claims that the word "ninja" is Agatean for "the breaking wind". In other words, they're silent but deadly.deadly.
[[AC: FridgeLogic: ]]
* It's implied that Jeremy attacked a clockmaker because he set his clock five minutes fast. Seems legit. But it's also established that Jeremy owns a watch that runs about five seconds fast, so that he and other people are warned to cover their ears when his other clocks chime the hour. Given how many clocks he has and how accurate they are, also legit. But isn't keeping a watch set five seconds fast hypocritical after attacking someone who set it fast as well?
[[AC: FridgeLogic: ]]
* It's implied that Jeremy attacked a clockmaker because he set his clock five minutes fast. Seems legit. But it's also established that Jeremy owns a watch that runs about five seconds fast, so that he and other people are warned to cover their ears when his other clocks chime the hour. Given how many clocks he has and how accurate they are, also legit. But isn't keeping a watch set five seconds fast hypocritical after attacking someone who set it fast as well?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 11 (click to see context) from:
* Meta-example: When you read ''Night Watch'', then go back to ''Thief of Time'' and realize that the entire section which occurs while time is stopped was happening simultaneously with [[spoiler: Vimes' and Carcer's jump back to the past]].
to:
* Meta-example: When you read ''Night Watch'', then go back to ''Thief of Time'' and realize that the entire section which occurs while time is stopped was happening simultaneously with [[spoiler: Vimes' and Carcer's jump back to the past]].past]].
* Lu-Tze claims that the word "ninja" is Agatean for "the breaking wind". In other words, they're silent but deadly.
* Lu-Tze claims that the word "ninja" is Agatean for "the breaking wind". In other words, they're silent but deadly.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 2 (click to see context) from:
* At the very beginning, Death watches the birth and wonders if that's what the problem was, or what the solution is going to be. A following exchange occurs:
to:
Changed line(s) 5,8 (click to see context) from:
** Only during the second reading, one can understand what the Death of Rats meant: [[spoiler: "Both."]]
*** Or [[spoiler: [[MathematiciansAnswer "Yes."]]]]
** It's also FridgeBrilliance that Death only saw Wen fetching Nanny Ogg, not the actual birth. Not only does this conceal the fact that [[spoiler: Lobsang and Jeremy are the same person]], but it also hides how [[spoiler: Death, himself, can't actually ''see'' Lobsang.]]
*** Or [[spoiler: [[MathematiciansAnswer "Yes."]]]]
** It's also FridgeBrilliance that Death only saw Wen fetching Nanny Ogg, not the actual birth. Not only does this conceal the fact that [[spoiler: Lobsang and Jeremy are the same person]], but it also hides how [[spoiler: Death, himself, can't actually ''see'' Lobsang.]]
to:
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 5,7 (click to see context) from:
* Only during the second reading, one can understand what the Death of Rats meant: [[spoiler: "Both."]]
** Or [[spoiler: [[MathematiciansAnswer "Yes."]]]]
** Or [[spoiler: [[MathematiciansAnswer "Yes."]]]]
to:
** It's also FridgeBrilliance that Death only saw Wen fetching Nanny Ogg, not the actual birth. Not only does this conceal the fact that [[spoiler: Lobsang and Jeremy are the same person]], but it also hides how [[spoiler: Death, himself, can't actually ''see'' Lobsang.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 5 (click to see context) from:
* Only during the second reading, one can understand what the Death of Rats meant: [[spoiler: the Death of Rats answers, "Both."]]
to:
* Only during the second reading, one can understand what the Death of Rats meant: [[spoiler: the Death of Rats answers, [[spoiler: "Both."]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 5 (click to see context) from:
Only during the second reading, one can understand what the Death of Rats meant: [[spoiler: the Death of Rats answers, "Both."]]
to:
* Only during the second reading, one can understand what the Death of Rats meant: [[spoiler: the Death of Rats answers, "Both."]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1 (click to see context) from:
FridgeBrilliance: At the very beginning, Death watches the birth and wonders if that's what the problem was, or what the solution is going to be. A following exchange occurs:
to:
[[AC: FridgeBrilliance: ]]
* At the very beginning, Death watches the birth and wonders if that's what the problem was, or what the solution is going to be. A following exchange occurs:
* At the very beginning, Death watches the birth and wonders if that's what the problem was, or what the solution is going to be. A following exchange occurs:
Changed line(s) 6 (click to see context) from:
* How do Susan and Myria/Unity kill Auditors by the score? Chocolate. You might consider it, even, a genocidal tactic. Back in ''Discworld/SoulMusic'', what did Susan's inner monologue name as her mother's favorite dish? Genocide by Chocolate.
to:
* How do Susan and Myria/Unity kill Auditors by the score? Chocolate. You might consider it, even, a genocidal tactic. Back in ''Discworld/SoulMusic'', what did Susan's inner monologue name as her mother's favorite dish? Genocide by
* Meta-example: When you read ''Night Watch'', then go back to ''Thief of Time'' and realize that the entire section which occurs while time is stopped was happening simultaneously with [[spoiler: Vimes' and Carcer's jump back to the past]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 2,3 (click to see context) from:
->Death of Rats: [[TheUnintelligible SQUEAK]]
->Death: QUITE SO. YOU MAY VERY WELL BE RIGHT.
->Death: QUITE SO. YOU MAY VERY WELL BE RIGHT.
to:
->Death of Rats: [[TheUnintelligible SQUEAK]]
[[AC:[[TheUnintelligible Squeak.]]]]
->Death:QUITE SO. YOU MAY VERY WELL BE RIGHT.[[AC:Quite so. You may very well be right.]]
->Death:
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 5 (click to see context) from:
** Or [[spoiler: [[MathematiciansAnswer "Yes."]]]]
to:
** Or [[spoiler: [[MathematiciansAnswer "Yes."]]]]"]]]]
* How do Susan and Myria/Unity kill Auditors by the score? Chocolate. You might consider it, even, a genocidal tactic. Back in ''Discworld/SoulMusic'', what did Susan's inner monologue name as her mother's favorite dish? Genocide by Chocolate.
* How do Susan and Myria/Unity kill Auditors by the score? Chocolate. You might consider it, even, a genocidal tactic. Back in ''Discworld/SoulMusic'', what did Susan's inner monologue name as her mother's favorite dish? Genocide by Chocolate.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 4 (click to see context) from:
Only during the second reading, one can understand what the Death of Rats meant: [[spoiler: the Death of Rats answers, "Both."]]
to:
Only during the second reading, one can understand what the Death of Rats meant: [[spoiler: the Death of Rats answers, "Both."]]"]]
** Or [[spoiler: [[MathematiciansAnswer "Yes."]]]]
** Or [[spoiler: [[MathematiciansAnswer "Yes."]]]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 4 (click to see context) from:
Only during the second reading, one can understand what the Death of Rats meant: [[spoiler: it said, "Both."]]
to:
Only during the second reading, one can understand what the Death of Rats meant: [[spoiler: it said, the Death of Rats answers, "Both."]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
FridgeBrilliance: At the very beginning, Death watches the birth and wonders if that's what the problem was, or what the solution is going to be. A following exchange occurs:
->Death of Rats: [[TheUnintelligible SQUEAK]]
->Death: QUITE SO. YOU MAY VERY WELL BE RIGHT.
Only during the second reading, one can understand what the Death of Rats meant: [[spoiler: it said, "Both."]]
->Death of Rats: [[TheUnintelligible SQUEAK]]
->Death: QUITE SO. YOU MAY VERY WELL BE RIGHT.
Only during the second reading, one can understand what the Death of Rats meant: [[spoiler: it said, "Both."]]