Follow TV Tropes

Following

History Fridge / LawAndOrderSpecialVictimsUnit

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* In "Hothouse", the VictimOfTheWeek is a math prodigy named Elsa who was the top student at her elite prep school, Morewood Academy, and the culprit is her rival Jennifer, who hated her because she couldn't outscore her on tests. The two girls were bitter rivals who absolutely loathed each other, with Jennifer describing Elsa as an InsufferableGenius who wouldn't even give her the time of day. We also find out that Elsa's father put her through TrainingFromHell from a very young age to make her a genius, abused her regularly and forced her to enter math competitions for the prize money to cover his gambling debts. Growing up, Elsa probably never had time to make friends or develop social skills, which would have made her come across as insufferable to Jennifer, on top of all the pressure that was already being put on both of them to succeed.

to:

* In "Hothouse", the VictimOfTheWeek is a math prodigy named Elsa who was the top student at her elite prep school, Morewood Academy, and the culprit is her rival Jennifer, who hated her because she couldn't outscore her on tests. The two girls were bitter rivals who absolutely loathed each other, with Jennifer describing Elsa as an InsufferableGenius who wouldn't even give her the time of day. We also find out that Elsa's father put her through TrainingFromHell from a very young age to make her a genius, abused her regularly and forced her to enter math competitions for the prize money to cover his gambling debts. Growing up, Elsa probably never had time to make friends or develop social skills, which would have made her come across as insufferable to Jennifer, on top of all the pressure that was already being put on both of them to succeed.
outscore each other.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* In "Hothouse", the VictimOfTheWeek is a math prodigy named Elsa who was the top student at her elite prep school, Morewood Academy, and the culprit is her rival Jennifer, who hated her because she couldn't outscore her on tests. The two girls were bitter rivals who absolutely loathed each other, with Jennifer describing Elsa as an InsufferableGenius who wouldn't even give her the time of day. We also find out that Elsa's father put her through TrainingFromHell from a young age to make her a genius, abused her regularly and forced her to enter math competitions for the prize money to cove his gambling debts. Growing up, Elsa probably never had time to make friends or develop social skills, which would have made her come across as insufferable to Jennifer, on top of all the pressure that was already being put on both of them to succeed.

to:

* In "Hothouse", the VictimOfTheWeek is a math prodigy named Elsa who was the top student at her elite prep school, Morewood Academy, and the culprit is her rival Jennifer, who hated her because she couldn't outscore her on tests. The two girls were bitter rivals who absolutely loathed each other, with Jennifer describing Elsa as an InsufferableGenius who wouldn't even give her the time of day. We also find out that Elsa's father put her through TrainingFromHell from a very young age to make her a genius, abused her regularly and forced her to enter math competitions for the prize money to cove cover his gambling debts. Growing up, Elsa probably never had time to make friends or develop social skills, which would have made her come across as insufferable to Jennifer, on top of all the pressure that was already being put on both of them to succeed.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* In "Hothouse", the VictimOfTheWeek is a math prodigy named Elsa who was the top student at her elite prep school, Morewood Academy, and the culprit is her rival Jennifer, who hated her because she couldn't outscore her on tests. The two girls were bitter rivals who absolutely loathed each other, with Jennifer describing Elsa as an InsufferableGenius who wouldn't even give her the time of day. We also find out that Elsa's father put her through TrainingFromHell from a young age to make her a genius, abused her regularly and forced her to enter math competitions for the prize money to cove his gambling debts. Growing up, Elsa probably never had time for friends and likely never developed any social skills, which would have made her come across as insufferable to Jennifer.

to:

* In "Hothouse", the VictimOfTheWeek is a math prodigy named Elsa who was the top student at her elite prep school, Morewood Academy, and the culprit is her rival Jennifer, who hated her because she couldn't outscore her on tests. The two girls were bitter rivals who absolutely loathed each other, with Jennifer describing Elsa as an InsufferableGenius who wouldn't even give her the time of day. We also find out that Elsa's father put her through TrainingFromHell from a young age to make her a genius, abused her regularly and forced her to enter math competitions for the prize money to cove his gambling debts. Growing up, Elsa probably never had time for to make friends and likely never developed any or develop social skills, which would have made her come across as insufferable to Jennifer.Jennifer, on top of all the pressure that was already being put on both of them to succeed.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

* In "Hothouse", the VictimOfTheWeek is a math prodigy named Elsa who was the top student at her elite prep school, Morewood Academy, and the culprit is her rival Jennifer, who hated her because she couldn't outscore her on tests. The two girls were bitter rivals who absolutely loathed each other, with Jennifer describing Elsa as an InsufferableGenius who wouldn't even give her the time of day. We also find out that Elsa's father put her through TrainingFromHell from a young age to make her a genius, abused her regularly and forced her to enter math competitions for the prize money to cove his gambling debts. Growing up, Elsa probably never had time for friends and likely never developed any social skills, which would have made her come across as insufferable to Jennifer.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Add to that, given how far along she was, there may have been limited options to begin with. Separate from the legal abortion window, an abortion at 20+ weeks is a different, more complicated procedure than a first-trimester abortion, and not all clinics are equipped to provide that procedure. If she did call another clinic or two and they told her they couldn't do a second-trimester abortion, that would probably add to the sense of the original clinic being her only hope.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** The couple probably had some kind of system to tell them which was which (like "the ones on the left are real formula, the ones on the right are the product"), so they wouldn't have made the mistake, but the housekeeper did because she had no way of knowing that not all of the formula was safe. As for why they kept it all in the same general area, if they were having housekeepers and the like in, they probably wanted to avoid anything that could remotely make someone ask questions.

to:

** The couple probably had some kind of system to tell them which was which (like "the ones on the left are real formula, the ones on the right are the product"), so they wouldn't have made the mistake, but the housekeeper did because she had no way of knowing that not all of the formula was safe. As for why they kept it all in the same general area, if they were having housekeepers and the like in, they probably wanted to avoid anything that could remotely make someone ask questions.questions (or, worse, that a housekeeper would think it was a mistake and "put away" the supposed formula where there would be a possibility for confusion).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Also, when Olivia interviews the "mom", she indicates the police called her ahead of time, presumably to make sure she was warned as soon as possible. It's possible that they did keep the real and fake cans separate usually, but put them together specifically in anticipation of the cops' arrival so that it wouldn't look suspicious.

to:

** Also, when Olivia interviews the "mom", she indicates the police called her ahead of time, presumably to make sure she was warned as soon as possible. It's possible that they did ''did'' keep the real and fake cans separate usually, but put them together specifically in anticipation of the cops' arrival so that it wouldn't look suspicious.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* From waaaay back in the series, the "Your ''Jew''?" scene. When Fin says "Then I'd be ''your boy'', John!", he's not just reiterating the validity of his own methods (basically improvised undercover), but making a pun ''and'' a joke on Munch being an old fart. Munch is using "my boy" as a particularly old-fashioned racist epithet, but in a modern context, your boy is your best friend. Of ''course'' Fin wouldn't object, it's only offensive if you're older than dirt.

to:

* From waaaay back in the series, the "Your ''Jew''?" scene. When Fin says "Then I'd be ''your boy'', John!", he's not just reiterating the validity of his own methods (basically improvised undercover), but making a pun ''and'' a joke on Munch being an old fart. Munch is using "my boy" as a particularly old-fashioned racist epithet, but in a modern context, your boy is your best friend. Of ''course'' Fin wouldn't object, it's only offensive if you're older than dirt.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* In "Risk," an infant dies after being fed liquid cocaine hidden in a liquid baby formula can. The baby's mother stole it from the couple she cleans for, who reportedly have a four-month-old baby themselves. Turns out the couple is smuggling cocaine across the border, using babies from the husband's corporate daycare as accessories to make it easier. But when the couple hands over the cans of formula, stored in their kitchen cabinet, for testing, only two of six were found to be cocaine. The rest were formula. Why keep them all in the same place? The techs couldn't tell until they removed the labels which ones had been tampered with, so why risk giving your client the wrong one? It's also not clear how long they keep the babies; the housekeeper was under the impression the latest one was theirs and the wife had been travelling with him several times over the past three weeks, so at least that long--why risk giving your product to the baby and a) now having less product and b) killing the baby?

to:

* In "Risk," an infant dies after being fed liquid cocaine hidden in a liquid baby formula can. The baby's mother stole it from the couple she cleans for, who reportedly have a four-month-old baby themselves. Turns out the couple is smuggling cocaine across the border, using babies from the husband's corporate daycare as accessories to make it easier. But when the couple hands over the cans of formula, stored in their kitchen cabinet, for testing, only two of six were found to be cocaine. The rest were formula. Why keep them all in the same place? The techs couldn't tell until they removed the labels which ones had been tampered with, so why risk giving your client the wrong one? It's also not clear how long they keep the babies; the housekeeper was under the impression the latest one was theirs and the wife had been travelling with him several times over the past three weeks, so at least that long--why risk giving your product to the baby and a) now having less product and b) killing the baby?baby?
** The couple probably had some kind of system to tell them which was which (like "the ones on the left are real formula, the ones on the right are the product"), so they wouldn't have made the mistake, but the housekeeper did because she had no way of knowing that not all of the formula was safe. As for why they kept it all in the same general area, if they were having housekeepers and the like in, they probably wanted to avoid anything that could remotely make someone ask questions.
** Also, when Olivia interviews the "mom", she indicates the police called her ahead of time, presumably to make sure she was warned as soon as possible. It's possible that they did keep the real and fake cans separate usually, but put them together specifically in anticipation of the cops' arrival so that it wouldn't look suspicious.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** There's an even more subtle brilliance to it. When they genuinely don't realize they're stepping in a federal case ("Raw"), are specifically asked to help ("Pandora"), or go through proper channels ("Merchandise"), then the negative consequences of this type are usually avoided. But when they intentionally ''interfere'' (as in, without getting permission, or worse after being expressly told to back off), then the problems start to happen. And there's actually a good in-universe reason that this is the case; if they're working ''with'' the Feds, then they have the full big picture and everything is coordinated, but if they're working ''against'' the Feds, they're probably only getting a limited view of the total situation and the two groups are not coordinating with each other, increasing the likelihood of a SpannerInTheWorks situation for one or both cases.

to:

** There's an even more subtle brilliance to it. When they genuinely don't realize they're stepping in a federal case ("Raw"), are specifically asked to help ("Pandora"), ("Pandora", "Informed"), or go through proper channels ("Merchandise"), then the negative consequences of this type are usually avoided. But when they intentionally ''interfere'' (as in, without getting permission, or worse after being expressly told to back off), then the problems start to happen. And there's actually a good in-universe reason that this is the case; if they're working ''with'' the Feds, then they have the full big picture and everything is coordinated, but if they're working ''against'' the Feds, they're probably only getting a limited view of the total situation and the two groups are not coordinating with each other, increasing the likelihood of a SpannerInTheWorks situation for one or both cases.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** There's an even more subtle brilliance to it. When they genuinely don't realize they're stepping in a federal case ("Raw"), are specifically asked to help ("Pandora"), or go through proper channels ("Merchandise"), then the negative consequences of this type are usually avoided. But when they intentionally ''interfere'' (as in, without getting permission, or worse after being expressly told to back off), then the problems start to happen. And there's actually a good in-universe reason that this is the case; if they're working ''with'' the Feds, then they have the full big picture and everything is coordinated, but if they're working ''against'' the Feds, it's more likely there will be pieces of the puzzle they're not aware of, increasing the likelihood of them ending up being a SpannerInTheWorks.

to:

** There's an even more subtle brilliance to it. When they genuinely don't realize they're stepping in a federal case ("Raw"), are specifically asked to help ("Pandora"), or go through proper channels ("Merchandise"), then the negative consequences of this type are usually avoided. But when they intentionally ''interfere'' (as in, without getting permission, or worse after being expressly told to back off), then the problems start to happen. And there's actually a good in-universe reason that this is the case; if they're working ''with'' the Feds, then they have the full big picture and everything is coordinated, but if they're working ''against'' the Feds, it's more likely there will be pieces of the puzzle they're probably only getting a limited view of the total situation and the two groups are not aware of, coordinating with each other, increasing the likelihood of them ending up being a SpannerInTheWorks.SpannerInTheWorks situation for one or both cases.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** There's an even more subtle brilliance to it. When they genuinely don't realize they're stepping in a federal case ("Raw"), are specifically asked to help ("Pandora"), or go through proper channels ("Merchandise"), then the negative consequences of this type are usually avoided. But when they intentionally ''interfere'' (as in, without getting permission, or worse after being expressly told to back off), then the problems start to happen. And there's actually a good in-universe reason that this is the case; if they're working ''with'' the Feds, then they have the full big picture, but if they're working ''against'' the Feds, it's more likely there will be pieces of the puzzle they're not aware of, increasing the likelihood of them throwing a SpannerInTheWorks.

to:

** There's an even more subtle brilliance to it. When they genuinely don't realize they're stepping in a federal case ("Raw"), are specifically asked to help ("Pandora"), or go through proper channels ("Merchandise"), then the negative consequences of this type are usually avoided. But when they intentionally ''interfere'' (as in, without getting permission, or worse after being expressly told to back off), then the problems start to happen. And there's actually a good in-universe reason that this is the case; if they're working ''with'' the Feds, then they have the full big picture, picture and everything is coordinated, but if they're working ''against'' the Feds, it's more likely there will be pieces of the puzzle they're not aware of, increasing the likelihood of them throwing ending up being a SpannerInTheWorks.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Something that's always bothered me about the show is Benson and Stabler having the habit of jumping into cases that aren't theirs, especially when the FBI are involved; there have been several episodes where the victim or suspected perp are involved with an FBI investigation, and they either jump in or treat the FBI as the bad guys for not assisting their case. It took me a while to notice, but it's actually the opposite! 9 times out of 10, Benson and Stabler's interfering actually makes things much ''worse''. In the episode where reoccurring agent Dana/Starr was raped, they went into such a frenzy assuming (incorrectly) she was in trouble/over her head/kidnapped after seeing her willingly enter a car that they indirectly caused several deaths (by being so obvious in their policework and frightening the baddies) and almost ruined months of undercover work. In another episode with a rapist in the witness protection program, if they had been content to let the FBI handle it, a shootout with the mafia that killed a dozen people would have been avoided — not to mention the deaths of both the rapist and his father. There's no way this is an accident since it keeps happening; the show is very subtly showing either a Deconstruction of what really happens when you jump into a case over your heads... or an outright TakeThat at the assumption time and time again that only the SVU detectives can solve the case.
** There's an even more subtle brilliance to it. When they genuinely don't realize they're stepping in a federal case ("Raw"), are specifically asked to help ("Pandora"), or go through proper channels ("Merchandise"), then they generally get the outcome they were hoping for. But when they ''intentionally'' charge in full speed ahead (sometimes after being specifically told not to), then we start to have problems.
** This is completely subverted, however, with "Acceptable Loss", in which the SVU cops' decision to defy a "drop it" order from Homeland Security ends up being the reason that a terrorist is caught. But even then, it's pretty much just dumb luck that things work out as well as they do (not to mention, Homeland Security was really holding the IdiotBall on that case anyway).

to:

* Something that's always bothered me about the show is Benson and Stabler having the habit of jumping into cases that aren't theirs, especially when the FBI are involved; there have been several episodes where the victim or suspected perp are involved with an FBI investigation, and they either jump in or treat the FBI as the bad guys for not assisting their case. It took me a while to notice, but it's actually the opposite! 9 times out of 10, Benson and Stabler's interfering actually makes things much ''worse''. In the episode where reoccurring agent Dana/Starr Dana Lewis was raped, they went into such a frenzy assuming (incorrectly) she was in trouble/over her head/kidnapped after seeing her willingly enter a car that they indirectly caused several deaths (by being so obvious in their policework and frightening the baddies) and almost ruined months of undercover work. In another episode with a rapist in the witness protection program, if they had been content to let the FBI handle it, a shootout with the mafia that killed a dozen people would have been avoided — not to mention the deaths of both the rapist and his father. There's no way this is an accident since it keeps happening; the show is very subtly showing either a Deconstruction of what really happens when you jump into a case over your heads... or an outright TakeThat at the assumption time and time again that only the SVU detectives can solve the case.
** There's an even more subtle brilliance to it. When they genuinely don't realize they're stepping in a federal case ("Raw"), are specifically asked to help ("Pandora"), or go through proper channels ("Merchandise"), then they generally get the outcome they were hoping for. negative consequences of this type are usually avoided. But when they ''intentionally'' charge in full speed ahead (sometimes intentionally ''interfere'' (as in, without getting permission, or worse after being specifically expressly told not to), to back off), then we the problems start to happen. And there's actually a good in-universe reason that this is the case; if they're working ''with'' the Feds, then they have problems.
the full big picture, but if they're working ''against'' the Feds, it's more likely there will be pieces of the puzzle they're not aware of, increasing the likelihood of them throwing a SpannerInTheWorks.
** This is completely subverted, however, with "Acceptable Loss", in which the SVU cops' decision to defy a "drop it" order from Homeland Security ends up being the reason that a terrorist is caught. caught, because Homeland Security ended up holding the IdiotBall on that case. But even then, it's pretty much just dumb luck that things work out as well as they do (not -- it's easy to mention, Homeland Security was really holding the IdiotBall on that case anyway).see how things could have gone wrong if a few details had been different.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Tempered by occasional FridgeBrilliance and ShownTheirWork. For example, what was the name of the radical group in the season 10 episode ''"Transitions"''? Children of Ariel. Many transgender children, especially mtf children, [[WhatDoYouMeanItsNotSymbolic express an affinity for]] [[Disney/TheLittleMermaid mermaids]].

to:

* Tempered by occasional FridgeBrilliance and ShownTheirWork. For example, what was the name of the radical group in the season 10 episode ''"Transitions"''? Children of Ariel. Many transgender children, especially mtf children, [[WhatDoYouMeanItsNotSymbolic express an affinity for]] [[Disney/TheLittleMermaid [[WesternAnimation/TheLittleMermaid1989 mermaids]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None




to:

\n* Sheila Porter, the biological maternal grandmother of Olivia's son Noah, did a lot of cold things in her attempt to kidnap him. One of the coldest was cozying up to the man she had take the boy, her landscaper who she romanced and lied to about life as a family, only to leave him both as a fall guy and distraction. But her abuse of his affections and gullibility become many orders of magnitude crueler when you realize, if he got sent to a real prison, all the other inmates would care about would be that he took a child, and all the guards would care about that it was a cop's child. He was being set up to die a horrible death.

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* In "Risk," an infant dies after being fed liquid cocaine hidden in a liquid baby formula can. The baby's mother stole it from the couple she cleans for, who reportedly have a four-month-old baby themselves. Turns out the couple is smuggling cocaine across the border, using babies from the husband's corporate daycare as accessories to make it easier. But when the couple hands over the cans of formula for testing, only two of six were found to be cocaine. The rest were formula. Why keep them all in the same place? The techs couldn't tell until they removed the labels which ones had been tampered with, so why risk giving your client the wrong one? It's also not clear how long they keep the babies; the housekeeper was under the impression the latest one was theirs and the wife had been travelling with him several times over the past three weeks, so at least that long--why risk giving your product to the baby and a) now having less product and b) killing the baby?

to:

* In "Risk," an infant dies after being fed liquid cocaine hidden in a liquid baby formula can. The baby's mother stole it from the couple she cleans for, who reportedly have a four-month-old baby themselves. Turns out the couple is smuggling cocaine across the border, using babies from the husband's corporate daycare as accessories to make it easier. But when the couple hands over the cans of formula formula, stored in their kitchen cabinet, for testing, only two of six were found to be cocaine. The rest were formula. Why keep them all in the same place? The techs couldn't tell until they removed the labels which ones had been tampered with, so why risk giving your client the wrong one? It's also not clear how long they keep the babies; the housekeeper was under the impression the latest one was theirs and the wife had been travelling with him several times over the past three weeks, so at least that long--why risk giving your product to the baby and a) now having less product and b) killing the baby?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* In "Parasites", the husband is stunned to learn that his wife is dead and that her twin sister has taken over. Fair enough, except. . .you didn't notice ANY changes in her? Her personality? Her domestic skills? Her bedroom skills? That she suddenly didn't know the names of friends, neighbors, etc.?

to:

* In "Parasites", the husband is stunned to learn that his wife is dead and that her twin sister has taken over. Fair enough, except. . .you didn't notice ANY changes in her? Her personality? Her domestic skills? Her bedroom skills? That she suddenly didn't know the names of friends, neighbors, etc.??
* In "Risk," an infant dies after being fed liquid cocaine hidden in a liquid baby formula can. The baby's mother stole it from the couple she cleans for, who reportedly have a four-month-old baby themselves. Turns out the couple is smuggling cocaine across the border, using babies from the husband's corporate daycare as accessories to make it easier. But when the couple hands over the cans of formula for testing, only two of six were found to be cocaine. The rest were formula. Why keep them all in the same place? The techs couldn't tell until they removed the labels which ones had been tampered with, so why risk giving your client the wrong one? It's also not clear how long they keep the babies; the housekeeper was under the impression the latest one was theirs and the wife had been travelling with him several times over the past three weeks, so at least that long--why risk giving your product to the baby and a) now having less product and b) killing the baby?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* In the Season 12 opener, "Locum", a young runaway, Mackenzie Burton, is found at a train station in the company of one Erik Weber, an anti-pedophilia activist who claims he just met her and was trying to convince her to go home. Though Weber is initially suspected of luring the girl from her home via online chat, the detectives find another individual behind the screen name, and realize Weber really didn't have an online relationship with Mackenzie. Weber is released, leaving detectives and viewers with the assumption that he really was just trying to help, and the story takes off in a different direction. But the following episode reveals that [[spoiler:Weber was actually a pedophile who raped two girls around the same age as Mackenzie. Was Weber actually trying to convince Mackenzie to go home, or did he have something else in mind?]]


to:

* In the Season 12 opener, "Locum", a young runaway, Mackenzie Burton, is found at a train station in the company of one Erik Weber, an anti-pedophilia activist who claims he just met her and was trying to convince her to go home. Though Weber is initially suspected of luring the girl from her home via online chat, the detectives find another individual behind the screen name, and realize Weber really didn't have an online relationship with Mackenzie. Weber is released, leaving detectives and viewers with the assumption that he really was just trying to help, and the story takes off in a different direction. But the following episode reveals that [[spoiler:Weber was actually a pedophile who raped two girls around the same age as Mackenzie. Was Weber actually trying to convince Mackenzie to go home, or did was he have something else in mind?]]

preparing to make her his next victim?]]

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** There's an even more subtle brilliance to it. When they're unaware of the FBI angle ("Raw"), are specifically asked to help ("Pandora"), or go through proper channels ("Merchandise"), then they generally get the outcome they were hoping for. But when they ''intentionally'' charge in full speed ahead (sometimes after being specifically told not to), then we start to have problems.

to:

** There's an even more subtle brilliance to it. When they genuinely don't realize they're unaware of the FBI angle stepping in a federal case ("Raw"), are specifically asked to help ("Pandora"), or go through proper channels ("Merchandise"), then they generally get the outcome they were hoping for. But when they ''intentionally'' charge in full speed ahead (sometimes after being specifically told not to), then we start to have problems.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** There's an even more subtle brilliance to it. When they're unaware of the FBI angle ("Raw"), are specifically asked to help ("Pandora"), or go through proper channels ("Merchandise"), things tend to work out. But when they ''intentionally'' charge in full speed ahead (sometimes after being specifically told not to), then we start to have problems.

to:

** There's an even more subtle brilliance to it. When they're unaware of the FBI angle ("Raw"), are specifically asked to help ("Pandora"), or go through proper channels ("Merchandise"), things tend to work out.then they generally get the outcome they were hoping for. But when they ''intentionally'' charge in full speed ahead (sometimes after being specifically told not to), then we start to have problems.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** There's an even more subtle brilliance to it. When they're unaware of the FBI angle ("Raw"), are specifically asked to help ("Pandora"), or go through proper channels ("Merchandise"), things tend to work out. But when they ''intentionally'' intervene (sometimes after being specifically told not to), then we start to have problems.

to:

** There's an even more subtle brilliance to it. When they're unaware of the FBI angle ("Raw"), are specifically asked to help ("Pandora"), or go through proper channels ("Merchandise"), things tend to work out. But when they ''intentionally'' intervene charge in full speed ahead (sometimes after being specifically told not to), then we start to have problems.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* In the Season 12 opener, "Locum", a young runaway, Mackenzie Burton, is found at a train station in the company of one Erik Weber, an anti-pedophilia activist who claims he just met her and was trying to convince her to go home. Though Weber is initially suspected of luring the girl from her home via online chat, the detectives find another individual behind the screen name, and realize Weber really didn't have an online relationship with Mackenzie. Weber is released, leaving detectives and viewers with the assumption that he really was just trying to help, and the story takes off in a different direction. But the following episode reveals that [[spoiler:Weber was actually a pedophile who raped two girls around the same age as Mackenzie.]] Was Weber actually trying to convince Mackenzie to go home, or would she have become his next victim if the police hadn't found her when they did?


to:

* In the Season 12 opener, "Locum", a young runaway, Mackenzie Burton, is found at a train station in the company of one Erik Weber, an anti-pedophilia activist who claims he just met her and was trying to convince her to go home. Though Weber is initially suspected of luring the girl from her home via online chat, the detectives find another individual behind the screen name, and realize Weber really didn't have an online relationship with Mackenzie. Weber is released, leaving detectives and viewers with the assumption that he really was just trying to help, and the story takes off in a different direction. But the following episode reveals that [[spoiler:Weber was actually a pedophile who raped two girls around the same age as Mackenzie.]] Was Weber actually trying to convince Mackenzie to go home, or would she did he have become his next victim if the police hadn't found her when they did?

something else in mind?]]

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* In the Season 12 opener, "Locum", a young runaway, Mackenzie Burton, is found at a train station in the company of one Erik Weber, an anti-pedophilia activist who claims he just met her and was trying to convince her to go home. Though Weber is initially suspected of luring the girl from her home via online chat, the detectives find another individual behind the screen name, and realize Weber really didn't have an online relationship with Mackenzie. Weber is released, leaving detectives and viewers with the assumption that he really was just trying to help, and the story takes off in a different direction. But the following episode reveals that [[spoiler:Weber was actually a pedophile who raped two girls around the same age as Mackenzie.]] What was Weber actually trying to do, and what might have happened if the police hadn't found Mackenzie when they did?


to:

* In the Season 12 opener, "Locum", a young runaway, Mackenzie Burton, is found at a train station in the company of one Erik Weber, an anti-pedophilia activist who claims he just met her and was trying to convince her to go home. Though Weber is initially suspected of luring the girl from her home via online chat, the detectives find another individual behind the screen name, and realize Weber really didn't have an online relationship with Mackenzie. Weber is released, leaving detectives and viewers with the assumption that he really was just trying to help, and the story takes off in a different direction. But the following episode reveals that [[spoiler:Weber was actually a pedophile who raped two girls around the same age as Mackenzie.]] What was Was Weber actually trying to do, and what might convince Mackenzie to go home, or would she have happened become his next victim if the police hadn't found Mackenzie her when they did?

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* In the Season 12 opener, "Locum", a young runaway, Mackenzie Burton, encounters Erik Weber, an anti-pedophilia activist, who claims he just met her and was trying to convince her to go home. Though Weber is initially suspected of luring the girl from her home via online chat, the detectives find another individual behind the screen name, and realize Weber really didn't have an online relationship with Mackenzie. Weber is released, leaving detectives and viewers with the assumption that he really was just trying to help, and the story takes off in a different direction. But the following episode reveals that [[spoiler: Weber was actually a pedophile who raped two girls around the same age as Mackenzie.]] What might have actually happened if the police hadn't found Mackenzie when they did?


to:

* In the Season 12 opener, "Locum", a young runaway, Mackenzie Burton, encounters is found at a train station in the company of one Erik Weber, an anti-pedophilia activist, activist who claims he just met her and was trying to convince her to go home. Though Weber is initially suspected of luring the girl from her home via online chat, the detectives find another individual behind the screen name, and realize Weber really didn't have an online relationship with Mackenzie. Weber is released, leaving detectives and viewers with the assumption that he really was just trying to help, and the story takes off in a different direction. But the following episode reveals that [[spoiler: Weber [[spoiler:Weber was actually a pedophile who raped two girls around the same age as Mackenzie.]] What was Weber actually trying to do, and what might have actually happened if the police hadn't found Mackenzie when they did?

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

* Munch's love of conspiracy theories? Yeah, Beltzer was on an episode of Series/TheXFiles, playing a police detective heavily implied to be Munch (circa 1989). He didn't believe anything [[Series/TheLoneGunmen the three computer-hacking lunatics]] he picked up from a warehouse break in were saying at the time. However, if that was Munch interrogating the Gunmen (who go on to make their own tabloid), and this series really is in the same universe as Series/TheXFiles, then Munch probably subscribes to the Gunmen's newspaper (the lads encountered a lot of outlandish stuff that turned out to be true) and is just ProperlyParanoid.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* In the Season 12 opener, "Locum", a young runaway, Mackenzie Burton, encounters Erik Weber, an anti-pedophilia activist, who claims he just met her and was trying to convince her to go home. Though Weber is initially suspected of luring the girl from her home via online chat, the detectives find another individual behind the screen name, and realize Weber really didn't have an online relationship with Mackenzie. Weber is released, leaving detectives with the assumption that he was telling the truth, and the story takes off in a different direction. But the following episode reveals that [[spoiler: Weber was actually a pedophile who raped two girls around the same age as Mackenzie.]] What might have actually happened if the police hadn't found Mackenzie when they did?


to:

* In the Season 12 opener, "Locum", a young runaway, Mackenzie Burton, encounters Erik Weber, an anti-pedophilia activist, who claims he just met her and was trying to convince her to go home. Though Weber is initially suspected of luring the girl from her home via online chat, the detectives find another individual behind the screen name, and realize Weber really didn't have an online relationship with Mackenzie. Weber is released, leaving detectives and viewers with the assumption that he really was telling the truth, just trying to help, and the story takes off in a different direction. But the following episode reveals that [[spoiler: Weber was actually a pedophile who raped two girls around the same age as Mackenzie.]] What might have actually happened if the police hadn't found Mackenzie when they did?

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None





** Oh, and on the subject of TakeThat moments, [[ReplacementScrappy Dani Beck]]'s existence makes a lot more sense when you realize she is essentially the manifestation of everything fans complained Olivia Benson should be. BeCarefulWhatYouWishFor,

to:

** Oh, and on the subject of TakeThat moments, [[ReplacementScrappy Dani Beck]]'s existence makes a lot more sense when you realize she is essentially the manifestation of everything fans complained Olivia Benson should be. BeCarefulWhatYouWishFor, BeCarefulWhatYouWishFor.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* One episode goes like this: Benson and Stabler suspect a recently-released ex-con that Stabler put away some time back for a series of rapes. For the first half of the episode, Stabler hassles the guy while looking for evidence to connect the dots. Finally, the suspect is found dead of a heroin overdose - just as they get word of another rape and attempted murder which had been committed while the guy was a corpse. After Stabler angsts for a bit, the second half starts up with Fin Tutuola going to meet and informant who gives them a lead on the real culprit. It was only after several viewings that I realized the episode was a TakeThat against Stabler, and a {{Deconstruction}} of the show's own abuse of ItsPersonal. During the first half, Stabler does his typical RabidCop routine and fixates on this one guy he had a personal history with, convinced he must be their man. Meanwhile, Tutuola was offscreen, slowly cracking the case by ''doing his job''.

to:

* One episode goes like this: Benson and Stabler suspect a recently-released ex-con that Stabler put away some time back for a series of rapes. For the first half of the episode, Stabler hassles the guy while looking for evidence to connect the dots. Finally, the suspect is found dead of a heroin overdose - just as they get word of another rape and attempted murder which had been committed while the guy was a corpse. After Stabler angsts for a bit, the second half starts up with Fin Tutuola going to meet and an informant who gives them a lead on the real culprit. It was only after several viewings that I realized the episode was a TakeThat against Stabler, and a {{Deconstruction}} of the show's own abuse of ItsPersonal. During the first half, Stabler does his typical RabidCop routine and fixates on this one guy he had a personal history with, convinced he must be their man. Meanwhile, Tutuola was offscreen, slowly cracking the case by ''doing his job''.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** The implication is that she believed that he was telling the truth (that she had a fever) and that other doctors would refuse to perform the procedure for the same reason. Also, she's fairly young and may have gotten mentally stuck on this one issue rather than parsing out the situation logically.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* In "Rockabye", why didn't Lauren just go to a different clinic? If she was that desperate, even after being told she had a fever, would she have really stopped at just the first clinic in the phone book?

to:

* In "Rockabye", why didn't Lauren just go to a different clinic? If she was that desperate, even after being told she had a fever, would she have really stopped at just the first clinic in the phone book?book?
* In "Parasites", the husband is stunned to learn that his wife is dead and that her twin sister has taken over. Fair enough, except. . .you didn't notice ANY changes in her? Her personality? Her domestic skills? Her bedroom skills? That she suddenly didn't know the names of friends, neighbors, etc.?

Top