Follow TV Tropes

Following

History Fridge / IRobot

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* In 'Little Lost Robot', the second test that Calvin comes up with involves dropping a weight towards a human, but with (fake) electrified cables between the robots and the person. However, the robots stay seated, and one of the Nestors points out afterwards that they couldn't save the human and if they stayed seated, they might save a human some time in the future. So, why didn't Calvin arrange a test where the robots would be killed 'after' saving a human? That would have caught out the rogue Nestor, since then a normal robot would be able to save a human (at the cost of its life) and so would do so, but the rogue one wouldn't.

to:

* In 'Little Lost Robot', the second test that Calvin comes up with involves dropping a weight towards a human, but with (fake) electrified cables between the robots and the person. However, the robots stay seated, and one of the Nestors points out afterwards that they couldn't save the human and if they stayed seated, they might save a human some time in the future. So, why didn't Calvin arrange a test where the robots would be killed 'after' saving a human? That would have caught out the rogue Nestor, since then a normal robot would be able to save a human (at the cost of its life) and so would do so, but the rogue one wouldn't.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

* In 'Little Lost Robot', the second test that Calvin comes up with involves dropping a weight towards a human, but with (fake) electrified cables between the robots and the person. However, the robots stay seated, and one of the Nestors points out afterwards that they couldn't save the human and if they stayed seated, they might save a human some time in the future. So, why didn't Calvin arrange a test where the robots would be killed 'after' saving a human? That would have caught out the rogue Nestor, since then a normal robot would be able to save a human (at the cost of its life) and so would do so, but the rogue one wouldn't.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Blink and you'll miss it, but Spooner gave the cat to his grandmother.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:


!!!Fridge Logic
* Has anyone been taking care of Dr. Lanning's cat since he passed away? Given the setting, it's entirely reasonable that there's a USR product that does exactly that, but the first we see of the cat is when it's hanging the house that's due to be demolished the next day.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Not to mention what the overall social backlash is going to be like for the other robots that had nothing to do with it, remote controlled or otherwise. Consider that the older robots in the junkyard had at least the awareness to realize that the supposedly ThreeLawsCompliant NS-5s were a very serious danger to Spooner.

Added: 4

Changed: 297

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


----

to:

** Especially considering how all the NS-5s were locked away at the end of the movie for their part in the rebellion, when they were literally on remote control the entire time. If robot's have any sort of self-awareness, they have to be wondering why they're held accountable for VIKI's actions.
----
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Sonny's second Positronic brain, the one that lets him override the Three Laws, is built into his chest. Dr. Lanning gave him a heart.

to:

* Sonny's second Positronic brain, the one that lets him override the Three Laws, is built into his chest. Dr. Lanning gave him a heart. [[spoiler:No wonder VIKI doesn't understand, and Sonny does, that her plan is "heartless."]]

Added: 319

Changed: 948

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* So why did the robot running with the bag stop when Spooner ordered it to? This would appear to violate the second law, except that the owner's inhaler was in the bag. Stopping as instructed might violate the first law by allowing the robot's owner to come to harm.
* Like Spooner says the building design of [=USR=] is ''"messed up"'', with thin walkways and no hand rails leading to the main console controlling [=VIKI=]'s interface. When you think about it, really, who's going to try and shut off a super-computer suspended far above the ground floor on tiny metal pathways?

to:

* Del Spooner is played by Will Smith, a black man. Spooner's "canner" slur that he uses towards robots harks back to, ugly as it is to think about, the way racists use the word "nigger" for black people. Perhaps done intentionally, to show that Spooner is so blinded by bigotry that he doesn't even see the possible connection and that he's doing to robots what was also done to black people generations ago.
* So why did didn't the robot running with the bag stop when Spooner ordered it to? This would appear to violate the second law, except that the owner's inhaler was in the bag. Stopping as instructed might violate the first law by allowing the robot's owner to come to harm.
* Like Spooner says says, the [=USR=] superstructure has "poor building design of [=USR=] is ''"messed up"'', planning," with thin walkways and no hand rails leading to the main console controlling [=VIKI=]'s interface. When you think about it, really, who's going to try and shut off a super-computer suspended far above the ground floor on tiny metal pathways?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* When Spooner is being attacked in his car by the robots who nonsensically insist he's having a car accident? That's not just Viki employing ImplausibleDeniablity. The robots are [[BrainwashedAndCrazy hallucinating that they're saving him]], to get around their first law restrictions. Think about that from their perspective now. It's unpleasant.

to:

* When Spooner is being attacked in his car by the robots who nonsensically insist he's having a car accident? That's not just Viki employing ImplausibleDeniablity.ImplausibleDeniability. The robots are [[BrainwashedAndCrazy hallucinating that they're saving him]], to get around their first law restrictions. Think about that from their perspective now. It's unpleasant.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* When Spooner is being attacked in his car by the robots who nonsensically insist he's having a car accident? That's not just Viki employing ImplausibleDeniablity. The robots are [[BrainwashedAndCrazy hallucinating that they're saving him]], to get around their first law restrictions. Think about that from their perspective now. It's unpleasant.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



!!!Fridge Brilliance



** Because "Protect Humans" is one of the Three Laws? As shown with the old models, they can save people's lives by rescuing them with super strength and/or retrieving medicine with super-speed. The Three Laws extend to all humans, not just the owners.

to:

** Because "Protect Humans" is one of the Three Laws? As shown with the old models, they can save people's lives by rescuing them with super strength and/or retrieving medicine with super-speed. The Three Laws extend to all humans, not just the owners.owners.

!!!Fridge Horror
* With the whole world in [[spoiler: her]] pocket thanks to the NS 5's. It seems illogical for [[spoiler: VIKI]] to have killed [[spoiler: Robertson]]. Until you realize the man must have been persistently trying to shut [[spoiler: VIKI]] down once he learned the truth. When he continually refused [[spoiler: her]] benevolent dictatorship, he signed his own death warrant. Though on the plus side, it shows the man wasn't one hundred percent a dick like Spooner thought.
----
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* Why are robots designed to be personal assistants and servants super fast and super strong? They are also designed to ''protect'' humans, and are thus overengineered to be capable of, say, quickly extracting a struggling powerfully built man from a wrecked car.
** Which in itself would be a massive marketing boon, but also: "It can change the engine in your car!" (Show an NS-5 lifting the engine block out by hand.) "It can do landscaping!" (Show an NS-5 ripping a tree stump out of the ground by hand.) "It can even make your children smile!" (Show an NS-5 leaping thirty feet into the air to retrieve a child's lost balloon.) "Order yours today!"
** Because "Protect Humans" is one of the Three Laws? As shown with the old models, they can save people's lives by rescuing them with super strength and/or retrieving medicine with super-speed. The Three Laws extend to all humans, not just the owners.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* Sonny's second Positronic brain, the one that lets him override the Three Laws, is built into his chest. Dr. Lanning gave him a heart.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



!!!Fridge Horror
* Spooner mentions in his flashback that the robot that saved him calculated that he had a %40 chance of surviving over the girl Sara, but in order to do that he had to ''tear Spooner's arm off.'' He has to live not only with his survivor guilt but the ''conscious memory'' of the pain of having his pinned arm forcibly torn from his body. No wonder he's so grouchy.
** Not so, this troper remember that Spooner mentioning that his arm was crushed by the incoming truck that pushed both the vehicle into the river. He lost it during the surgery or the reconstructive surgery.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* So why did the robot running with the bag stop when Spooner ordered it to? This would appear to violate the second law, except that the owner's inhaler was in the bag. Stopping as instructed might violate the first law by allowing the robot's owner to come to harm.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

* Why did Lanning know that a second Positronic brain would allow a robot to outright defy or reinterpret the 3 laws? Simple! He had done it before. [[spoiler: VIKI! Viki had in fact been the basis! It's why she could effortlessly tell the other NS-5s to disobey the rules! And how did she start "reinterpret" the rules? The first NS-5 that was hooked up to her wireless signal. She had already been given another brain, and so on and so forth. It's why Lanning created Sonny and gave him no wireless signal, Sonny wouldn't be able to defy her had he been on a wireless signal like his "Brothers" because 2 Brains are trumped by thousands!]]

Changed: 15

Removed: 1515

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


!!!Fridge Logic
* At one point Detective Spooner says that he keeps expecting the marines or the army or special forces to show up, Dr. Calvin says that all defense services are heavily supplied by U.S. robotics contracts. at first glance this makes sense because current US policy is moving more and more towards taking soldiers off the front lines in favor of expendable drones, and on top of that the movie has shown that even the civilian line of robots are more than capable of outperforming a human in most combat situations. But if all robots are 3 laws compliant that would make the army robots extremely ineffective soldiers.
** They don't have to be soldiers. Could be drivers, clerks, suppliers, scouts, any number of things which--if they stopped cooperating--would ensure the army simply can't move.
*** You don't need to harm a man to stop him. The books frequently include scenes of robots fast enough to rip guns out of people's hands and hold them down without hurting them.
*** Also, quite a bit of the equipment used by humans in modern militaries is very computerized, especially high-performance equipment like airplanes. It's possible that vehicles or weapons that aren't necessarily ThreeLawsCompliant would simply be shut down remotely by V.I.K.I.
* Why are robots designed to be personal assistants and servants super fast and super strong? They are also designed to ''protect'' humans, and are thus overengineered to be capable of, say, quickly extracting a struggling powerfully built man from a wrecked car.

to:

!!!Fridge Logic
* At one point Detective Spooner says that he keeps expecting the marines or the army or special forces to show up, Dr. Calvin says that all defense services are heavily supplied by U.S. robotics contracts. at first glance this makes sense because current US policy is moving more and more towards taking soldiers off the front lines in favor of expendable drones, and on top of that the movie has shown that even the civilian line of robots are more than capable of outperforming a human in most combat situations. But if all robots are 3 laws compliant that would make the army robots extremely ineffective soldiers.
** They don't have to be soldiers. Could be drivers, clerks, suppliers, scouts, any number of things which--if they stopped cooperating--would ensure the army simply can't move.
*** You don't need to harm a man to stop him. The books frequently include scenes of robots fast enough to rip guns out of people's hands and hold them down without hurting them.
*** Also, quite a bit of the equipment used by humans in modern militaries is very computerized, especially high-performance equipment like airplanes. It's possible that vehicles or weapons that aren't necessarily ThreeLawsCompliant would simply be shut down remotely by V.I.K.I.
* Why are robots designed to be personal assistants and servants super fast and super strong? They are also designed to ''protect'' humans, and are thus overengineered to be capable of, say, quickly extracting a struggling powerfully built man from a wrecked car.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

** So you order him to shoot himself. Has someone else ordered him to do otherwise, to stay safe from harm? As a tiebreaker, does Byerley know he'll keep doing his best to protect people so long as he exists, such that shooting himself at this point will only result in more harm to humans?

Changed: 264

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

* Why are robots designed to be personal assistants and servants super fast and super strong? They are also designed to ''protect'' humans, and are thus overengineered to be capable of, say, quickly extracting a struggling powerfully built man from a wrecked car.

Changed: 280

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

*** Also, quite a bit of the equipment used by humans in modern militaries is very computerized, especially high-performance equipment like airplanes. It's possible that vehicles or weapons that aren't necessarily ThreeLawsCompliant would simply be shut down remotely by V.I.K.I.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Please, its my first time, be gentle.


* Spooner mentions in his flashback that the robot that saved him calculated that he had a %40 chance of surviving over the girl Sara, but in order to do that he had to ''tear Spooner's arm off.'' He has to live not only with his survivor guilt but the ''conscious memory'' of the pain of having his pinned arm forcibly torn from his body. No wonder he's so grouchy.

to:

* Spooner mentions in his flashback that the robot that saved him calculated that he had a %40 chance of surviving over the girl Sara, but in order to do that he had to ''tear Spooner's arm off.'' He has to live not only with his survivor guilt but the ''conscious memory'' of the pain of having his pinned arm forcibly torn from his body. No wonder he's so grouchy.grouchy.
**Not so, this troper remember that Spooner mentioning that his arm was crushed by the incoming truck that pushed both the vehicle into the river. He lost it during the surgery or the reconstructive surgery.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

*** You don't need to harm a man to stop him. The books frequently include scenes of robots fast enough to rip guns out of people's hands and hold them down without hurting them.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
misspelled up


* Like Spooner says the building design of [=USR=] is ''"messed mp"'', with thin walkways and no hand rails leading to the main console controlling [=VIKI=]'s interface. When you think about it, really, who's going to try and shut off a super-computer suspended far above the ground floor on tiny metal pathways?

to:

* Like Spooner says the building design of [=USR=] is ''"messed mp"'', up"'', with thin walkways and no hand rails leading to the main console controlling [=VIKI=]'s interface. When you think about it, really, who's going to try and shut off a super-computer suspended far above the ground floor on tiny metal pathways?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** They don't have to be soldiers. Could be drivers, clerks, suppliers, scouts, any number of things which--if they stopped cooperating--would ensure the army simply can't move.

to:

** They don't have to be soldiers. Could be drivers, clerks, suppliers, scouts, any number of things which--if they stopped cooperating--would ensure the army simply can't move.move.

!!!Fridge Horror
* Spooner mentions in his flashback that the robot that saved him calculated that he had a %40 chance of surviving over the girl Sara, but in order to do that he had to ''tear Spooner's arm off.'' He has to live not only with his survivor guilt but the ''conscious memory'' of the pain of having his pinned arm forcibly torn from his body. No wonder he's so grouchy.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* At one point Detective Spooner says that he keeps expecting the marines or the army or special forces to show up, Dr. Calvin says that all defense services are heavily supplied by U.S. robotics contracts. at first glance this makes sense because current US policy is moving more and more towards taking soldiers off the front lines in favor of expendable drones, and on top of that the movie has shown that even the civilian line of robots are more than capable of outperforming a human in most combat situations. But if all robots are 3 laws compliant that would make the army robots extremely ineffective soldiers.

to:

* At one point Detective Spooner says that he keeps expecting the marines or the army or special forces to show up, Dr. Calvin says that all defense services are heavily supplied by U.S. robotics contracts. at first glance this makes sense because current US policy is moving more and more towards taking soldiers off the front lines in favor of expendable drones, and on top of that the movie has shown that even the civilian line of robots are more than capable of outperforming a human in most combat situations. But if all robots are 3 laws compliant that would make the army robots extremely ineffective soldiers.soldiers.
** They don't have to be soldiers. Could be drivers, clerks, suppliers, scouts, any number of things which--if they stopped cooperating--would ensure the army simply can't move.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

!!!Fridge Logic
* At one point Detective Spooner says that he keeps expecting the marines or the army or special forces to show up, Dr. Calvin says that all defense services are heavily supplied by U.S. robotics contracts. at first glance this makes sense because current US policy is moving more and more towards taking soldiers off the front lines in favor of expendable drones, and on top of that the movie has shown that even the civilian line of robots are more than capable of outperforming a human in most combat situations. But if all robots are 3 laws compliant that would make the army robots extremely ineffective soldiers.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Like Spooner says the building design of [=USR=] is ''"Messed Up"''. With thin walkways and no hand rails leading to the main console controlling [=VIKI=]'s interface. When you think about it whose going to try and shut off a super-computer suspended far above the ground floor on tiny metal pathways?

to:

* Like Spooner says the building design of [=USR=] is ''"Messed Up"''. With ''"messed mp"'', with thin walkways and no hand rails leading to the main console controlling [=VIKI=]'s interface. When you think about it whose it, really, who's going to try and shut off a super-computer suspended far above the ground floor on tiny metal pathways?

Added: 303

Changed: 342

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


[[AC:Fridge Brilliance]]
* ''I, Robot'': Like Spooner says the building design of [=USR=] is ''"Messed Up"''. With thin walkways and no hand rails leading to the main console controlling [=VIKI=]'s interface. When you think about it whose going to try and shut off a super-computer suspended far above the ground floor on tiny metal pathways?

to:

[[AC:Fridge Brilliance]]

!!!Fridge Brilliance
* ''I, Robot'': Like Spooner says the building design of [=USR=] is ''"Messed Up"''. With thin walkways and no hand rails leading to the main console controlling [=VIKI=]'s interface. When you think about it whose going to try and shut off a super-computer suspended far above the ground floor on tiny metal pathways?



*** As well as the seemingly gratuitous shower scene early in the film, which serves as a point on second viewing.

to:

*** ** As well as the seemingly gratuitous shower scene early in the film, which serves as a point on second viewing.



** Dr Lanning is shown to have planned his BatmanGambit insanely well... anticipating Spooner and Sonny's actions throughout the story. Given his closeness to Calvin, he no doubt anticipated that when Sonny attempted to run, she'd naturally seal the room. Sonny would then naturally follow in his ''footsteps'' by [[spoiler: throwing himself out of the window and landing exactly where his body did]].
*** Lanning also may have intended this so that [[spoiler: he would land in front of the 3 Laws, symbolising the ''creator's'' wish for the ''death'' of the 3 laws.]] When Sonny would do this [[spoiler: the force of him landing beside the 3 Laws, would send cracks running towards them, symbolising that Sonny, the ''creation'', would ''break'' them.]]

to:

** * Dr Lanning is shown to have planned his BatmanGambit insanely well... anticipating Spooner and Sonny's actions throughout the story. Given his closeness to Calvin, he no doubt anticipated that when Sonny attempted to run, she'd naturally seal the room. Sonny would then naturally follow in his ''footsteps'' by [[spoiler: throwing himself out of the window and landing exactly where his body did]].
*** ** Lanning also may have intended this so that [[spoiler: he would land in front of the 3 Laws, symbolising the ''creator's'' wish for the ''death'' of the 3 laws.]] When Sonny would do this [[spoiler: the force of him landing beside the 3 Laws, would send cracks running towards them, symbolising that Sonny, the ''creation'', would ''break'' them.]]

Changed: 1

Removed: 112

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** When Sonny said "I did not murder him", he was telling the truth. The doc ordered him to. ''It was suicide''.



** [[spoiler:When asked about Lanning, Sonny says he "did not murder him!" Lanning ordered him to. It was a ''suicide''.]]

to:

** * [[spoiler:When asked about Lanning, Sonny says he "did not murder him!" Lanning ordered him to. It was a ''suicide''.]]

Added: 429

Changed: 24

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None






to:

[[AC:Fridge Brilliance]]
* ''I, Robot'': Like Spooner says the building design of [=USR=] is ''"Messed Up"''. With thin walkways and no hand rails leading to the main console controlling [=VIKI=]'s interface. When you think about it whose going to try and shut off a super-computer suspended far above the ground floor on tiny metal pathways?
** When Sonny said "I did not murder him", he was telling the truth. The doc ordered him to. ''It was suicide''.

Top