Follow TV Tropes

Following

History Fridge / AnimalFarm

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
General clarification on work content


* Pigs are the only animals on the farm that have to die to be useful. Benjamin and Boxer and Clover, they pull carts and work hard. Geese and chickens are useful for their eggs (and there is an early fight for their rights to keep some of their eggs and raise the next generation). Gander, male goose, is the first character to die as a victim of the system. Sheep, cows, goats, all produce milk, with sheep producing wool as well. Even cat is catching mice, sparrows and pigeons, which can be understood as guarding the food supply. Dogs protect the farm. Only pigs neither produce anything nor do any useful work.

to:

* Pigs are the only animals on the farm that have to die to be useful. Benjamin and Boxer and Clover, they pull carts and work hard. Geese and chickens are useful for their eggs (and there is an early fight for their rights to keep some of their eggs and raise the next generation). Gander, male goose, goose who is not as useful on the farm as female geese are, is the first character to die as a victim of the system.system because of his failure to build the windmill on time. Sheep, cows, goats, all produce milk, with sheep producing wool as well. Even cat is catching mice, sparrows and pigeons, which can be understood as guarding the food supply. Dogs protect the farm. Only pigs neither produce anything nor do any useful work.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Added example(s)



to:

* Pigs are the only animals on the farm that have to die to be useful. Benjamin and Boxer and Clover, they pull carts and work hard. Geese and chickens are useful for their eggs (and there is an early fight for their rights to keep some of their eggs and raise the next generation). Gander, male goose, is the first character to die as a victim of the system. Sheep, cows, goats, all produce milk, with sheep producing wool as well. Even cat is catching mice, sparrows and pigeons, which can be understood as guarding the food supply. Dogs protect the farm. Only pigs neither produce anything nor do any useful work.

Added: 233

Changed: 226

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* In the 1954 film, the pigs are the only animals who speak for the most part while the other animals use normal animal sounds to communicate. This actually works well as a metaphor for how the pigs are becoming more like the humans.




to:

** It could also be a reference to the term "snowball effect" as he's the one advocating for the animals to spread their rebellion to other farms, similar to how western nations feared the spread of communism around the world.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** It also at least comes with some degree of RealLifeWritesThePlot. Napoleon's regime was based on Joseph Stalin's control over the Soviet Union. Stalin died prior to the 1955 film, excusing Napoleon's overthrow there, while the Soviet Union had collapsed by the time of the 1999 film. Combining this with Napoleon's exagerrated incompetence and self-indulgence in the film, and likely had nothing to thrive off of with the other animals gone, it can be assumed that the pig unwittingly paved his own ruin.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* Snowball is nowhere near as bad as Napoleon and Squealer, but he's far from a hero; he participates in the earliest instances of the pigs reaping some of the benefits of the revolution while the other animals don't get to share in them. However, from what we can tell, he really does believe in the dream of Animal Farm and wants to actually improve things; while things were on shaky ground before, it's only after he's driven off that things ''really'' go to Hell in a handcart, and the pigs start violently oppressing the other animals. In other words, the bad behavior of the pigs... ''snowballed''.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Napoleon and Squealer both slowly rewrite the rules of Animalism for their ends. Despite their actions violating the ''spirit'' of Animalism, Napoleon and Squealer get away with their crimes because they manipulate to manipulate ''the letter'' of the law for themselves.

to:

** Napoleon and Squealer both slowly rewrite the Animalism's rules of Animalism for their ends. Despite their actions violating the ''spirit'' of Animalism, Napoleon and Squealer get away with their crimes because they manipulate to manipulate ''the letter'' the ''letter'' of the law for themselves.



** Censoring "Beasts of England," the song central to the revolution, with a song that celebrates Napoleon, which is also a means by which Napoleon can manipulate the animals into worshipping him even as he betrays them.

to:

** Censoring "Beasts of England," the song central to the revolution, with a song that celebrates Napoleon, which is also a means by which Napoleon can manipulate the animals into worshipping him even as he betrays them.



* While Mollie manages to enjoy a decent life at another farm, what's going to happen to her once she is inevitably worn out.

to:

* While Mollie manages to enjoy enjoys a decent life at another farm, what's going to what will happen to her once she is inevitably worn out.out?

Added: 1313

Changed: 37

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* In the film version, why is Jessie so optimistic that the new owners will treat the farm better? Because she's seen first hand that animals (namely pigs) are capable of great evil. Though that would normally leave one cynical, it also taught a [[TheAntiNihilist strangely optimistic]] lesson to Jessie that if animals are capable of great evil, then perhaps humans are also capable of [[HumansAreGood great good]].
* In the film version features a happy ending with Napoleon's regime collapsing. While this might seem a bit cheesy and shoehorned, Napoleon's reign crumbling isn't too farfetched: Jones lost his farm as a consequence of his vices. With Napoleon adopting some of Jones' worse habits, like alcoholism, it is possible that those same vices destroyed Napoleon's health and administrative prowess, [[HistoryRepeats causing the farm to also collapse]].

to:

* In the film version, why is Jessie so optimistic that the new owners will treat the farm better? Because she's seen first hand firsthand that animals (namely pigs) are capable of great evil. Though that would normally leave one cynical, it also taught a [[TheAntiNihilist strangely optimistic]] lesson to Jessie that if animals are capable of great evil, then perhaps humans are also capable of [[HumansAreGood great good]].
* In the The film version features a happy ending with Napoleon's regime collapsing. While this might seem a bit cheesy and shoehorned, Napoleon's reign crumbling isn't too farfetched: Jones lost his farm as a consequence of due to his vices. With Napoleon adopting some of Jones' worse habits, like alcoholism, it is possible that those same vices destroyed Napoleon's health and administrative prowess, prowess [[HistoryRepeats causing the farm to collapse as well]].
* The book predates ''Literature/NineteenEightyFour'' by a few years, but in ''Animal Farm'', you can find several themes of the later book. Namely the power of language and propaganda to manipulate others.
** The first time language is used manipulatively is when the chickens protest that the "four legs" rule would exclude them because they only have two. Snowball uses a weird argument to claim that wings can count as legs. The chickens don't understand the complexities of the argument but it sounds nice to them that they stop complaining.
** Napoleon and Squealer both slowly rewrite the rules of Animalism for their ends. Despite their actions violating the ''spirit'' of Animalism, Napoleon and Squealer get away with their crimes because they manipulate to manipulate ''the letter'' of the law for themselves.
** Squealer's constant denunciation of Snowball works well enough that the animals are brainwashed into believing he was on the side of man all along.
** Censoring "Beasts of England," the song central to the revolution, with a song that celebrates Napoleon, which is
also collapse]].a means by which Napoleon can manipulate the animals into worshipping him even as he betrays them.


Added DiffLines:

* While Mollie manages to enjoy a decent life at another farm, what's going to happen to her once she is inevitably worn out.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* In the film version features a happy ending with Napoleon's regime collapsing. While this might seem a bit cheesy and shoehorned, Napoleon's reign crumbling isn't too farfetched: Jones lost his farm as a consequence of his vices. With Napoleon adopting some of Jones' worse habits, like alcoholism, it is possible that those same vices destroyed Napoleon's health and administrative prowess, [[HistoryRepeats causing the farm to also collapse]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* Considering what the Pigs did to Boxer, what's going to happen to ''Clover'' now that she's become infirm and partially blind.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

!Fridge Brilliance
* In the film version, why is Jessie so optimistic that the new owners will treat the farm better? Because she's seen first hand that animals (namely pigs) are capable of great evil. Though that would normally leave one cynical, it also taught a [[TheAntiNihilist strangely optimistic]] lesson to Jessie that if animals are capable of great evil, then perhaps humans are also capable of [[HumansAreGood great good]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Clover's reaction at the end. Orwell didn't say her reaction but we can either assume she's either horrified, completely broken, or both, with all that's happned.

to:

* Clover's reaction at the end. Orwell didn't say her reaction but we can either assume she's either horrified, completely broken, or both, with all that's happned.happened.

Added: 437

Removed: 274

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


!Fridge Horror
* Several animals on the farm are obligate carnivores. [[CarnivoreConfusion While the narrative skirts around this for the sake of allegory in the beginning,]] it's not difficult to imagine what became of the bodies of executed animals after things went south.
*Clover's reaction at the end. Orwell didn't say her reaction but we can either assume she's either horrified, completely broken, or both, with all that's happned.



See the [[Headscratchers/AnimalFarm Headscratchers page]].

!Fridge Horror
* Several animals on the farm are obligate carnivores. [[CarnivoreConfusion While the narrative skirts around this for the sake of allegory in the beginning,]] it's not difficult to imagine what became of the bodies of executed animals after things went south.

to:

See the [[Headscratchers/AnimalFarm Headscratchers page]].

!Fridge Horror
* Several animals on the farm are obligate carnivores. [[CarnivoreConfusion While the narrative skirts around this for the sake of allegory in the beginning,]] it's not difficult to imagine what became of the bodies of executed animals after things went south.
page]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Several animals on the farm obligate carnivores. [[CarnivoreConfusion While the narrative skirts around this for the sake a allegory in the beginning,]] it's not difficult to imagine what became of the bodies of executed animals after things went south.

to:

* Several animals on the farm are obligate carnivores. [[CarnivoreConfusion While the narrative skirts around this for the sake a of allegory in the beginning,]] it's not difficult to imagine what became of the bodies of executed animals after things went south.

Changed: 1190

Removed: 182

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* One of the arguments Old Major uses to rile up the animals against the humans is that they steal their goods from them (milk, eggs, wool, ect.). It's fairly common knowledge that most common farm animals are domesticated and certain critters produce more than they naturally need. For example, cows are able to produce plenty of milk long after their calves are weaned and chickens are able to lay non-fertilized eggs. It's easy for us to understand, but these guys couldn't even read at that point, so how would that know the effects domestication has had on them? Going further, if they did somehow know and fully understand, who's to say they wouldn't go into denial because that's all the more power humans have over them.
** Okay, there's a world of difference between an animal understanding the effects of domestication vs simple observation of a farmer taking products clearly created by the animals. I doubt Old Major's point went any further than 'they take our stuff' and find it extremely unlikely they had or gained any knowledge about the process of domestication. Third point, I haven't the slightest idea if I'm addressing your point as I can't see it in that meandering paragraph.
* Where would the gander who committed suicide in Chapter 8 have gotten those nightshade berries?
** Nightshade is a common enough weed that it probably wouldn't be hard to find some.

to:

* One of See the arguments Old Major uses to rile up the animals against the humans is that they steal their goods from them (milk, eggs, wool, ect.). It's fairly common knowledge that most common farm animals are domesticated and certain critters produce more than they naturally need. For example, cows are able to produce plenty of milk long after their calves are weaned and chickens are able to lay non-fertilized eggs. It's easy for us to understand, but these guys couldn't even read at that point, so how would that know the effects domestication has had on them? Going further, if they did somehow know and fully understand, who's to say they wouldn't go into denial because that's all the more power humans have over them.
** Okay, there's a world of difference between an animal understanding the effects of domestication vs simple observation of a farmer taking products clearly created by the animals. I doubt Old Major's point went any further than 'they take our stuff' and find it extremely unlikely they had or gained any knowledge about the process of domestication. Third point, I haven't the slightest idea if I'm addressing your point as I can't see it in that meandering paragraph.
* Where would the gander who committed suicide in Chapter 8 have gotten those nightshade berries?
** Nightshade is a common enough weed that it probably wouldn't be hard to find some.
[[Headscratchers/AnimalFarm Headscratchers page]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Nightshade is a common enough weed that it probably wouldn't be hard to find some.

to:

** Nightshade is a common enough weed that it probably wouldn't be hard to find some.some.
!Fridge Horror
* Several animals on the farm obligate carnivores. [[CarnivoreConfusion While the narrative skirts around this for the sake a allegory in the beginning,]] it's not difficult to imagine what became of the bodies of executed animals after things went south.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


!! Fridge Logic

to:

!! Fridge Logic
!Fridge Logic



Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* One of the arguments Old Major uses to rile up the animals against the humans is that they steal their goods from them (milk, eggs, wool, ect.). It's fairly common knowledge that most common farm animals are domesticated and certain critters have evolved to produce more than they naturally need. For example, cows are able to produce plenty of milk long after their calves are weaned and chickens are able to lay non-fertilized eggs. It's easy for us to understand, but these guys couldn't even read at that point, so how would that know the effects domestication has had on them? Going further, if they did somehow know and fully understand, who's to say they wouldn't go into denial because that's all the more power humans have over them.

to:

* One of the arguments Old Major uses to rile up the animals against the humans is that they steal their goods from them (milk, eggs, wool, ect.). It's fairly common knowledge that most common farm animals are domesticated and certain critters have evolved to produce more than they naturally need. For example, cows are able to produce plenty of milk long after their calves are weaned and chickens are able to lay non-fertilized eggs. It's easy for us to understand, but these guys couldn't even read at that point, so how would that know the effects domestication has had on them? Going further, if they did somehow know and fully understand, who's to say they wouldn't go into denial because that's all the more power humans have over them.

Added: 85

Changed: 2

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* One of the arguments Old Major uses to rile up the animals against the humans is that they steal their goods from them (milk, eggs, wool, ect.). It's fairly common knowledge that most common farm animals are domesticated and certain critters have evolved to produce more than they naturally need. For example, cows are able to produce plenty of milk long after their calves are weaned and chickens are able to lay none-fertilized eggs. It's easy for us to understand, but these guys couldn't even read at that point, so how would that know the effects domestication has had on them? Going further, if they did somehow know and fully understand, who's to say they wouldn't go into denial because that's all the more power humans have over them.
** Okay, there's a world of difference between an animal understanding the effects of domestication vs simple observation of a farmer taking products clearly created by the animals. I doubt Old Majors point went any further than 'they take our stuff' and find it extremely unlikely they had or gained any knowledge about the process of domestication. Third point, I haven't the slightest idea if I'm addressing your point as I can't see it in that meandering paragraph.

* Where would the gander who committed suicide in Chapter 8 have gotten those nightshade berries?

to:

* One of the arguments Old Major uses to rile up the animals against the humans is that they steal their goods from them (milk, eggs, wool, ect.). It's fairly common knowledge that most common farm animals are domesticated and certain critters have evolved to produce more than they naturally need. For example, cows are able to produce plenty of milk long after their calves are weaned and chickens are able to lay none-fertilized non-fertilized eggs. It's easy for us to understand, but these guys couldn't even read at that point, so how would that know the effects domestication has had on them? Going further, if they did somehow know and fully understand, who's to say they wouldn't go into denial because that's all the more power humans have over them.
** Okay, there's a world of difference between an animal understanding the effects of domestication vs simple observation of a farmer taking products clearly created by the animals. I doubt Old Majors Major's point went any further than 'they take our stuff' and find it extremely unlikely they had or gained any knowledge about the process of domestication. Third point, I haven't the slightest idea if I'm addressing your point as I can't see it in that meandering paragraph.

* Where would the gander who committed suicide in Chapter 8 have gotten those nightshade berries?berries?
** Nightshade is a common enough weed that it probably wouldn't be hard to find some.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

**Okay, there's a world of difference between an animal understanding the effects of domestication vs simple observation of a farmer taking products clearly created by the animals. I doubt Old Majors point went any further than 'they take our stuff' and find it extremely unlikely they had or gained any knowledge about the process of domestication. Third point, I haven't the slightest idea if I'm addressing your point as I can't see it in that meandering paragraph.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* One of the arguments Old Major uses to rile up the animals against the humans is that they steal their goods from them (milk, eggs, wool, ect.). It's fairly common knowledge that most common farm animals are domesticated and certain critters have evolved to produce more than they naturally need. For example, cows are able to produce plenty of milk long after their calves are weaned and chickens are able to lay none-fertilized eggs. It's easy for us to understand, but these guys couldn't even read at that point, so how would that know the effects domestication has had on them? Going further, if they did somehow know and fully understand, who's to say they wouldn't go into denial because that's all the more power humans have over them.

to:

* One of the arguments Old Major uses to rile up the animals against the humans is that they steal their goods from them (milk, eggs, wool, ect.). It's fairly common knowledge that most common farm animals are domesticated and certain critters have evolved to produce more than they naturally need. For example, cows are able to produce plenty of milk long after their calves are weaned and chickens are able to lay none-fertilized eggs. It's easy for us to understand, but these guys couldn't even read at that point, so how would that know the effects domestication has had on them? Going further, if they did somehow know and fully understand, who's to say they wouldn't go into denial because that's all the more power humans have over them.them.

* Where would the gander who committed suicide in Chapter 8 have gotten those nightshade berries?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


!! Fridge Brilliance

to:

!! Fridge Brilliance
Logic
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

!! Fridge Brilliance

* One of the arguments Old Major uses to rile up the animals against the humans is that they steal their goods from them (milk, eggs, wool, ect.). It's fairly common knowledge that most common farm animals are domesticated and certain critters have evolved to produce more than they naturally need. For example, cows are able to produce plenty of milk long after their calves are weaned and chickens are able to lay none-fertilized eggs. It's easy for us to understand, but these guys couldn't even read at that point, so how would that know the effects domestication has had on them? Going further, if they did somehow know and fully understand, who's to say they wouldn't go into denial because that's all the more power humans have over them.

Top