Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 20 (click to see context) from:
* [[GodwinsLaw Godwin's Law]]: Fast and hard. A fair portion of the movie towards the end involves trying to directly link acceptance of evolution and the Holocaust.
to:
* [[GodwinsLaw Godwin's Law]]: Fast and hard. A fair portion of the movie towards the end involves trying to directly link acceptance of evolution and the Holocaust. Naturally, people were quite outraged that Stein, who is Jewish, would try to pull this card.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* DavidVersusGoliath: There's a very staged scene that attempts to portray an Intelligent Design organization as a David standing against the Goliath of evolutionary science. Stein wanders around a street, supposedly having difficulty finding the huge building where he expects the organization to be housed. When he's finally pointed to the building, he announces that the organization surely takes up the entire building. Lo and behold, the organization is quite small and takes up only one office!
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
** Moreover, both RichardDawkins and PZ Myers were interviewed under the claim that it was a documentary ''about'' the controversy of evolution vs. creationism or intelligent design, rather than pushing one idea over the other in a blatantly one-sided way.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 14,15 (click to see context) from:
* DocumentaryOfLies: For instance, to illustrate the point of the evils of evolutionary theory, the movie includes a passage from Darwin's ''The Descent of Man'' that seemingly favors eugenics and culling the infirm and insane, but cuts Darwin praising doctors and lawmakers for their care of and concern for the weak and the poor. These portions of the text are in the middle of the quote, making their exclusion an intentional lie by omission. The following paragraph of the book, omitted in its entirety, has Darwin unambiguously state as evil that the very views the film ascribes to him.
** This is called quote mining, a very common tactic which has also been used against RichardDawkins the same way. Except, in the portion of the movie interviewing Dawkins, Ben Stein tries to twist or quote mine several things Dawkins says, while leaving in the original content that reveals Steins dishonesty.
** This is called quote mining, a very common tactic which has also been used against RichardDawkins the same way. Except, in the portion of the movie interviewing Dawkins, Ben Stein tries to twist or quote mine several things Dawkins says, while leaving in the original content that reveals Steins dishonesty.
to:
* DocumentaryOfLies: For instance, to illustrate the point of the evils of evolutionary theory, the movie includes a passage from Darwin's ''The Descent of Man'' that seemingly favors eugenics and culling the infirm and insane, but cuts Darwin praising doctors and lawmakers for their care of and concern for the weak and the poor. These portions of the text are in the middle of the quote, making their exclusion an intentional lie by omission. The following paragraph of the book, omitted in its entirety, has Darwin unambiguously state as evil that the very views the film ascribes to him.
** This is called [[QuoteMine quotemining, mining]], a very common tactic which has also been used against RichardDawkins the same way. Except, in the portion of the movie interviewing Dawkins, Ben Stein tries to twist or quote mine several things Dawkins says, while leaving in the original content that reveals Steins dishonesty.
** This is called [[QuoteMine quote
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 22,23 (click to see context) from:
* QuoteMine: A common (and probably not unfounded) complaint levied agains the film by critics.
to:
* QuoteMine: A common (and probably not unfounded) complaint levied agains against the film by critics.
critics. (See Documentary of Lies above.)
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 22 (click to see context) from:
to:
* QuoteMine: A common (and probably not unfounded) complaint levied agains the film by critics.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 14 (click to see context) from:
* DocumentaryOfLies: For instance, to illustrate the point of the evils of evolutionary theory, the movie includes a passage from Darwin's ''The Descent of Man'' that seemingly favors eugenics and culling the infirm and insane, but cuts Darwin praising doctors and lawmakers for their care of the concern of the weak and the poor. These portions of the text are in the middle of the quote, making their exclusion an intentional lie by omission. The following paragraph of the book, omitted in its entirety, has Darwin unambiguously state as evil that the very views the film ascribes to him.
to:
* DocumentaryOfLies: For instance, to illustrate the point of the evils of evolutionary theory, the movie includes a passage from Darwin's ''The Descent of Man'' that seemingly favors eugenics and culling the infirm and insane, but cuts Darwin praising doctors and lawmakers for their care of the and concern of for the weak and the poor. These portions of the text are in the middle of the quote, making their exclusion an intentional lie by omission. The following paragraph of the book, omitted in its entirety, has Darwin unambiguously state as evil that the very views the film ascribes to him.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 11 (click to see context) from:
* ArbitrarySkepticism: If you're going to argue that Intelligent Design is a real possibility ''and'' doesn't require belief in God, then panspermia should not be offensive to you...
to:
* ArbitrarySkepticism: If you're going to argue that Intelligent Design is a real possibility ''and'' doesn't require belief in God, then panspermia should not be offensive to you...you, as it's pretty much the only other option.
Changed line(s) 15 (click to see context) from:
** This is called quote mining, a very common tactic which has also been used against RichardDawkins the same way.
to:
** This is called quote mining, a very common tactic which has also been used against RichardDawkins the same way. Except, in the portion of the movie interviewing Dawkins, Ben Stein tries to twist or quote mine several things Dawkins says, while leaving in the original content that reveals Steins dishonesty.
Changed line(s) 18 (click to see context) from:
* [[GodwinsLaw Godwin's Law]]: Fast and hard.
to:
* [[GodwinsLaw Godwin's Law]]: Fast and hard. A fair portion of the movie towards the end involves trying to directly link acceptance of evolution and the Holocaust.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
** This is called quote mining, a very common tactic which has also been used against RichardDawkins the same way.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Deleted line(s) 14,15 (click to see context) :
* CompletelyMissingThePoint: The example below, using John Lennon's "Imagine" to depict how terrible the world would be without religion - when the song in question makes the exact opposite point...
** The intent with that choice may have been {{Irony}}, however.
** The intent with that choice may have been {{Irony}}, however.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 21 (click to see context) from:
* InsaneTrollLogic: Possibly on both sides.
to:
* InsaneTrollLogic: Possibly on both sides.Hooboy.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 13 (click to see context) from:
** See the FunnyMoment page for an incident which makes this fact ''hilarious''.
to:
** See the FunnyMoment page [[Funny/{{Expelled}} Funny Moment page]] for an incident which makes this fact ''hilarious''.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
** See the FunnyMoment page for an incident which makes this fact ''hilarious''.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Remove for Rule Of Cautious Editing Judgment.
Changed line(s) 1,2 (click to see context) from:
''Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed'' is a documentary film conducted by Ben Stein [[InTheStyleOf in the style of]] documentaries of the 2000s. Stein appears to be following the steps of such luminaries as Al Gore and MichaelMoore in style.
to:
''Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed'' is a documentary film conducted by Ben Stein [[InTheStyleOf in the style of]] documentaries of the 2000s. Stein appears to be following the steps of such luminaries as Al Gore and MichaelMoore in style.\n
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* BigBad: RichardDawkins. Ben Stein thinks Dawkins is THE [[{{Atheism}} atheist]] to beat if atheism is indeed correct. He treats his confrontation with Dawkins as the FinalBoss of the movie.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 17 (click to see context) from:
* HitlerAteSugar
to:
* HitlerAteSugarHitlerAteSugar: The documentary goes some ways to tie Darwin and his work to eugenics and ultimately to the Nazis. It becomes all the more obvious as it progresses.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Interesting, but doesn\'t really fit trope.
Deleted line(s) 11 (click to see context) :
* BlatantLies: To illustrate the point of the evils of evolutionary theory, the movie includes a passage from Darwin's ''The Descent of Man'' that seemingly favors eugenics and culling the infirm and insane, but cuts Darwin praising doctors and lawmakers for their care of the concern of the weak and the poor. These portions of the text are in the middle of the quote, making their exclusion an intentional lie by omission. The following paragraph of the book, omitted in its entirety, has Darwin unambiguously state as evil that the very views the film ascribes to him.
Changed line(s) 14 (click to see context) from:
* DocumentaryOfLies
to:
* DocumentaryOfLiesDocumentaryOfLies: For instance, to illustrate the point of the evils of evolutionary theory, the movie includes a passage from Darwin's ''The Descent of Man'' that seemingly favors eugenics and culling the infirm and insane, but cuts Darwin praising doctors and lawmakers for their care of the concern of the weak and the poor. These portions of the text are in the middle of the quote, making their exclusion an intentional lie by omission. The following paragraph of the book, omitted in its entirety, has Darwin unambiguously state as evil that the very views the film ascribes to him.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Deleted line(s) 11 (click to see context) :
** Except that it has "sperm" in its name....
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 12 (click to see context) from:
* BlatantLies: To illustrate the point of the evils of evolutionary theory, the movie includes a passage from Darwin's ''The Descent of Man'' that seemingly favors eugenics and culling the infirm and insane, but cuts Darwin praising doctors and lawmakers for their care of the concern of the weak and the poor. These portions of the text are in the middle of the quote, making their exclusion an intentional lie by omission.
to:
* BlatantLies: To illustrate the point of the evils of evolutionary theory, the movie includes a passage from Darwin's ''The Descent of Man'' that seemingly favors eugenics and culling the infirm and insane, but cuts Darwin praising doctors and lawmakers for their care of the concern of the weak and the poor. These portions of the text are in the middle of the quote, making their exclusion an intentional lie by omission. The following paragraph of the book, omitted in its entirety, has Darwin unambiguously state as evil that the very views the film ascribes to him.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* BlatantLies: To illustrate the point of the evils of evolutionary theory, the movie includes a passage from Darwin's ''The Descent of Man'' that seemingly favors eugenics and culling the infirm and insane, but cuts Darwin praising doctors and lawmakers for their care of the concern of the weak and the poor. These portions of the text are in the middle of the quote, making their exclusion an intentional lie by omission.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Not that I agree even slightly with Ben Stein\'s position, but while the man\'s known for comedy, he is also a prominent social and economic speaker and is a former professor. The only better candidate to lead the movie would likely be a fully-accredited biologist who rejects evolutionary theory, slightly less rare than dodos.
Deleted line(s) 21 (click to see context) :
* [[PoesLaw Poe's Law]]: Seriously, if the best spokesman Intelligent Design can find is a comedian, then evolution might not be the ''only'' target.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
** Except that it has "sperm" in its name....
Added DiffLines:
** The intent with that choice may have been {{Irony}}, however.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* CompletelyMissingThePoint: The example below, using John Lennon's "Imagine" to depict how terrible the world would be without religion - when the song in question makes the exact opposite point...
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 3,4 (click to see context) from:
The substance? It's on "Darwinist" evolutionists and how they try to suppress the views of anyone in favor of "Intelligent Design". Depending on whom you ask and how they're feeling on the day you ask, Intelligent Design is either a form of creationism, or a form of evolution which nonetheless contains the tenet that certain things cannot have evolved without outside help. It also argues that Darwinism creates atheism and moral corruption.
to:
The substance? It's on "Darwinist" evolutionists and how they try to suppress the views of anyone in favor of "Intelligent Design". Depending on whom you ask and how they're feeling on the day you ask, Intelligent Design is either a form of creationism, or a form of evolution which nonetheless contains the tenet that certain things cannot have evolved without outside help. It also argues that Darwinism "Darwinism" creates atheism and moral corruption.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 7 (click to see context) from:
It did surprisingly well In America, considering it was an independent film (financed by intelligent design proponents). Naturally, it got help from church groups. It would've done even better, except YokoOno noticed that JohnLennon's music was being used in the film to suggest a position that Lennon would never have supported (maybe even two of them), and the film was pulled out of theaters so the copyright issue could be settled.
to:
It did surprisingly well In America, considering it was an independent film (financed by intelligent design proponents). Naturally, it got help from church groups. It would've might have done even better, except YokoOno noticed that JohnLennon's music was being used in the film to suggest a position that Lennon would never have supported (maybe even two of them), and the film was pulled out of theaters so the copyright issue could be settled.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Deleted line(s) 12 (click to see context) :
** [[MemeticMutation O]] [[YourMileageMayVary RLY?]]
Changed line(s) 15 (click to see context) from:
* GodwinsLaw: Fast and hard.
to:
* GodwinsLaw: [[GodwinsLaw Godwin's Law]]: Fast and hard.
Changed line(s) 19 (click to see context) from:
* PoesLaw: Seriously, if the best spokesman Intelligent Design can find is a comedian, then Darwinian evolution might not be the ''only'' target.
to:
* PoesLaw: [[PoesLaw Poe's Law]]: Seriously, if the best spokesman Intelligent Design can find is a comedian, then Darwinian then evolution might not be the ''only'' target.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1,2 (click to see context) from:
''Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed'' is a documentary film conducted by Ben Stein InTheStyleOf great documentaries of the 2000s. Stein appears to be following the steps of such luminaries as Al Gore and MichaelMoore in style.
to:
''Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed'' is a documentary film conducted by Ben Stein InTheStyleOf great [[InTheStyleOf in the style of]] documentaries of the 2000s. Stein appears to be following the steps of such luminaries as Al Gore and MichaelMoore in style.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 12 (click to see context) from:
** [[MemeticMutation O RLY?]]
to:
** [[MemeticMutation O O]] [[YourMileageMayVary RLY?]]