Follow TV Tropes

Following

History Film / Expelled

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* [[GodwinsLaw Godwin's Law]]: Fast and hard. A fair portion of the movie towards the end involves trying to directly link acceptance of evolution and the Holocaust.

to:

* [[GodwinsLaw Godwin's Law]]: Fast and hard. A fair portion of the movie towards the end involves trying to directly link acceptance of evolution and the Holocaust. Naturally, people were quite outraged that Stein, who is Jewish, would try to pull this card.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* DavidVersusGoliath: There's a very staged scene that attempts to portray an Intelligent Design organization as a David standing against the Goliath of evolutionary science. Stein wanders around a street, supposedly having difficulty finding the huge building where he expects the organization to be housed. When he's finally pointed to the building, he announces that the organization surely takes up the entire building. Lo and behold, the organization is quite small and takes up only one office!
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Moreover, both RichardDawkins and PZ Myers were interviewed under the claim that it was a documentary ''about'' the controversy of evolution vs. creationism or intelligent design, rather than pushing one idea over the other in a blatantly one-sided way.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* DocumentaryOfLies: For instance, to illustrate the point of the evils of evolutionary theory, the movie includes a passage from Darwin's ''The Descent of Man'' that seemingly favors eugenics and culling the infirm and insane, but cuts Darwin praising doctors and lawmakers for their care of and concern for the weak and the poor. These portions of the text are in the middle of the quote, making their exclusion an intentional lie by omission. The following paragraph of the book, omitted in its entirety, has Darwin unambiguously state as evil that the very views the film ascribes to him.
** This is called quote mining, a very common tactic which has also been used against RichardDawkins the same way. Except, in the portion of the movie interviewing Dawkins, Ben Stein tries to twist or quote mine several things Dawkins says, while leaving in the original content that reveals Steins dishonesty.

to:

* DocumentaryOfLies: For instance, to illustrate the point of the evils of evolutionary theory, the movie includes a passage from Darwin's ''The Descent of Man'' that seemingly favors eugenics and culling the infirm and insane, but cuts Darwin praising doctors and lawmakers for their care of and concern for the weak and the poor. These portions of the text are in the middle of the quote, making their exclusion an intentional lie by omission. The following paragraph of the book, omitted in its entirety, has Darwin unambiguously state as evil that the very views the film ascribes to him.
** This is called [[QuoteMine quote mining, mining]], a very common tactic which has also been used against RichardDawkins the same way. Except, in the portion of the movie interviewing Dawkins, Ben Stein tries to twist or quote mine several things Dawkins says, while leaving in the original content that reveals Steins dishonesty.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* QuoteMine: A common (and probably not unfounded) complaint levied agains the film by critics.

to:

* QuoteMine: A common (and probably not unfounded) complaint levied agains against the film by critics.
critics. (See Documentary of Lies above.)
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None



to:

* QuoteMine: A common (and probably not unfounded) complaint levied agains the film by critics.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* DocumentaryOfLies: For instance, to illustrate the point of the evils of evolutionary theory, the movie includes a passage from Darwin's ''The Descent of Man'' that seemingly favors eugenics and culling the infirm and insane, but cuts Darwin praising doctors and lawmakers for their care of the concern of the weak and the poor. These portions of the text are in the middle of the quote, making their exclusion an intentional lie by omission. The following paragraph of the book, omitted in its entirety, has Darwin unambiguously state as evil that the very views the film ascribes to him.

to:

* DocumentaryOfLies: For instance, to illustrate the point of the evils of evolutionary theory, the movie includes a passage from Darwin's ''The Descent of Man'' that seemingly favors eugenics and culling the infirm and insane, but cuts Darwin praising doctors and lawmakers for their care of the and concern of for the weak and the poor. These portions of the text are in the middle of the quote, making their exclusion an intentional lie by omission. The following paragraph of the book, omitted in its entirety, has Darwin unambiguously state as evil that the very views the film ascribes to him.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ArbitrarySkepticism: If you're going to argue that Intelligent Design is a real possibility ''and'' doesn't require belief in God, then panspermia should not be offensive to you...

to:

* ArbitrarySkepticism: If you're going to argue that Intelligent Design is a real possibility ''and'' doesn't require belief in God, then panspermia should not be offensive to you...you, as it's pretty much the only other option.



** This is called quote mining, a very common tactic which has also been used against RichardDawkins the same way.

to:

** This is called quote mining, a very common tactic which has also been used against RichardDawkins the same way. Except, in the portion of the movie interviewing Dawkins, Ben Stein tries to twist or quote mine several things Dawkins says, while leaving in the original content that reveals Steins dishonesty.



* [[GodwinsLaw Godwin's Law]]: Fast and hard.

to:

* [[GodwinsLaw Godwin's Law]]: Fast and hard. A fair portion of the movie towards the end involves trying to directly link acceptance of evolution and the Holocaust.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** This is called quote mining, a very common tactic which has also been used against RichardDawkins the same way.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* CompletelyMissingThePoint: The example below, using John Lennon's "Imagine" to depict how terrible the world would be without religion - when the song in question makes the exact opposite point...
** The intent with that choice may have been {{Irony}}, however.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* InsaneTrollLogic: Possibly on both sides.

to:

* InsaneTrollLogic: Possibly on both sides.Hooboy.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** See the FunnyMoment page for an incident which makes this fact ''hilarious''.

to:

** See the FunnyMoment page [[Funny/{{Expelled}} Funny Moment page]] for an incident which makes this fact ''hilarious''.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** See the FunnyMoment page for an incident which makes this fact ''hilarious''.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:


''Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed'' is a documentary film conducted by Ben Stein [[InTheStyleOf in the style of]] documentaries of the 2000s. Stein appears to be following the steps of such luminaries as Al Gore and MichaelMoore in style.

to:

''Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed'' is a documentary film conducted by Ben Stein [[InTheStyleOf in the style of]] documentaries of the 2000s. Stein appears to be following the steps of such luminaries as Al Gore and MichaelMoore in style.\n
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* BigBad: RichardDawkins. Ben Stein thinks Dawkins is THE [[{{Atheism}} atheist]] to beat if atheism is indeed correct. He treats his confrontation with Dawkins as the FinalBoss of the movie.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:



Added DiffLines:

Changed: 150

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* HitlerAteSugar

to:

* HitlerAteSugarHitlerAteSugar: The documentary goes some ways to tie Darwin and his work to eugenics and ultimately to the Nazis. It becomes all the more obvious as it progresses.

Changed: 572

Removed: 571

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Interesting, but doesn\'t really fit trope.


* BlatantLies: To illustrate the point of the evils of evolutionary theory, the movie includes a passage from Darwin's ''The Descent of Man'' that seemingly favors eugenics and culling the infirm and insane, but cuts Darwin praising doctors and lawmakers for their care of the concern of the weak and the poor. These portions of the text are in the middle of the quote, making their exclusion an intentional lie by omission. The following paragraph of the book, omitted in its entirety, has Darwin unambiguously state as evil that the very views the film ascribes to him.



* DocumentaryOfLies

to:

* DocumentaryOfLiesDocumentaryOfLies: For instance, to illustrate the point of the evils of evolutionary theory, the movie includes a passage from Darwin's ''The Descent of Man'' that seemingly favors eugenics and culling the infirm and insane, but cuts Darwin praising doctors and lawmakers for their care of the concern of the weak and the poor. These portions of the text are in the middle of the quote, making their exclusion an intentional lie by omission. The following paragraph of the book, omitted in its entirety, has Darwin unambiguously state as evil that the very views the film ascribes to him.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Except that it has "sperm" in its name....
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* BlatantLies: To illustrate the point of the evils of evolutionary theory, the movie includes a passage from Darwin's ''The Descent of Man'' that seemingly favors eugenics and culling the infirm and insane, but cuts Darwin praising doctors and lawmakers for their care of the concern of the weak and the poor. These portions of the text are in the middle of the quote, making their exclusion an intentional lie by omission.

to:

* BlatantLies: To illustrate the point of the evils of evolutionary theory, the movie includes a passage from Darwin's ''The Descent of Man'' that seemingly favors eugenics and culling the infirm and insane, but cuts Darwin praising doctors and lawmakers for their care of the concern of the weak and the poor. These portions of the text are in the middle of the quote, making their exclusion an intentional lie by omission. The following paragraph of the book, omitted in its entirety, has Darwin unambiguously state as evil that the very views the film ascribes to him.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* BlatantLies: To illustrate the point of the evils of evolutionary theory, the movie includes a passage from Darwin's ''The Descent of Man'' that seemingly favors eugenics and culling the infirm and insane, but cuts Darwin praising doctors and lawmakers for their care of the concern of the weak and the poor. These portions of the text are in the middle of the quote, making their exclusion an intentional lie by omission.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Not that I agree even slightly with Ben Stein\'s position, but while the man\'s known for comedy, he is also a prominent social and economic speaker and is a former professor. The only better candidate to lead the movie would likely be a fully-accredited biologist who rejects evolutionary theory, slightly less rare than dodos.


* [[PoesLaw Poe's Law]]: Seriously, if the best spokesman Intelligent Design can find is a comedian, then evolution might not be the ''only'' target.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Except that it has "sperm" in its name....


Added DiffLines:

** The intent with that choice may have been {{Irony}}, however.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* CompletelyMissingThePoint: The example below, using John Lennon's "Imagine" to depict how terrible the world would be without religion - when the song in question makes the exact opposite point...
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


The substance? It's on "Darwinist" evolutionists and how they try to suppress the views of anyone in favor of "Intelligent Design". Depending on whom you ask and how they're feeling on the day you ask, Intelligent Design is either a form of creationism, or a form of evolution which nonetheless contains the tenet that certain things cannot have evolved without outside help. It also argues that Darwinism creates atheism and moral corruption.

to:

The substance? It's on "Darwinist" evolutionists and how they try to suppress the views of anyone in favor of "Intelligent Design". Depending on whom you ask and how they're feeling on the day you ask, Intelligent Design is either a form of creationism, or a form of evolution which nonetheless contains the tenet that certain things cannot have evolved without outside help. It also argues that Darwinism "Darwinism" creates atheism and moral corruption.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


It did surprisingly well In America, considering it was an independent film (financed by intelligent design proponents). Naturally, it got help from church groups. It would've done even better, except YokoOno noticed that JohnLennon's music was being used in the film to suggest a position that Lennon would never have supported (maybe even two of them), and the film was pulled out of theaters so the copyright issue could be settled.

to:

It did surprisingly well In America, considering it was an independent film (financed by intelligent design proponents). Naturally, it got help from church groups. It would've might have done even better, except YokoOno noticed that JohnLennon's music was being used in the film to suggest a position that Lennon would never have supported (maybe even two of them), and the film was pulled out of theaters so the copyright issue could be settled.

Changed: 40

Removed: 52

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** [[MemeticMutation O]] [[YourMileageMayVary RLY?]]



* GodwinsLaw: Fast and hard.

to:

* GodwinsLaw: [[GodwinsLaw Godwin's Law]]: Fast and hard.



* PoesLaw: Seriously, if the best spokesman Intelligent Design can find is a comedian, then Darwinian evolution might not be the ''only'' target.

to:

* PoesLaw: [[PoesLaw Poe's Law]]: Seriously, if the best spokesman Intelligent Design can find is a comedian, then Darwinian then evolution might not be the ''only'' target.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


''Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed'' is a documentary film conducted by Ben Stein InTheStyleOf great documentaries of the 2000s. Stein appears to be following the steps of such luminaries as Al Gore and MichaelMoore in style.

to:

''Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed'' is a documentary film conducted by Ben Stein InTheStyleOf great [[InTheStyleOf in the style of]] documentaries of the 2000s. Stein appears to be following the steps of such luminaries as Al Gore and MichaelMoore in style.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** [[MemeticMutation O RLY?]]

to:

** [[MemeticMutation O O]] [[YourMileageMayVary RLY?]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** [[MemeticMutation O RLY?]]

Top