Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Dewicked trope
Deleted line(s) 47 (click to see context) :
* BadassBeard: Brom has one.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* AdaptationDistillation: A lot of the first act gets compressed into a few days rather than taking place over months; some of this is understandable given not much of importance happens in the book's first fourteen chapters besides Eragon finding Saphira and Garrow being killed.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 3,4 (click to see context) from:
An {{Action}}-{{Adventure}} {{Fantasy}} film adaptation of the first book in the ''Literature/InheritanceCycle'', ''Literature/{{Eragon}}'', was made in 2006, starring Ed Speelers as Eragon, Creator/JeremyIrons as Brom, Creator/RachelWeisz as the voice of Saphira and Creator/JohnMalkovich as Galbatorix. Like its contemporary ''Film/TheGoldenCompass'', the movie took considerable liberties, leaving the core story basically intact, but changing countless details from the book. A [[{{VideoGame/Eragon}} video game]] based off the movie was released a month in advance.
to:
An {{Action}}-{{Adventure}} {{Action|Genre}}-{{Adventure}} {{Fantasy}} film adaptation of the first book in the ''Literature/InheritanceCycle'', ''Literature/{{Eragon}}'', was made in 2006, starring Ed Speelers as Eragon, Creator/JeremyIrons as Brom, Creator/RachelWeisz as the voice of Saphira and Creator/JohnMalkovich as Galbatorix. Like its contemporary ''Film/TheGoldenCompass'', the movie took considerable liberties, leaving the core story basically intact, but changing countless details from the book. A [[{{VideoGame/Eragon}} video game]] based off the movie was released a month in advance.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 11 (click to see context) from:
** Durza himself is made a much more competent and resourceful character. In the books, he struggled in a duel against an untrained Eragon, got easily fooled by BlatantLies about Eragon's true name, had to retreat every time Saphira joined the scene, and was even temporarily killed by a regular arrow. Meanwhile, in the movie he seems in control all the time, never loses a fight until the final battle, and even takes out Saphira without breaking a sweat by creating a shadow creature even more powerful than her.
to:
** Durza himself is made a much more competent and resourceful character. In the books, he struggled in a duel against an untrained Eragon, got easily fooled by BlatantLies about Eragon's true name, had to retreat every time Saphira joined the scene, and was even temporarily killed by a regular arrow. Meanwhile, in the movie he seems in control all the time, never loses a fight until the final battle, battle (Eragon shooting him is treated as a minor inconvenience), and even takes out Saphira without breaking a sweat by creating a shadow creature even more powerful than her.
Changed line(s) 22 (click to see context) from:
** Zig-zagged with the gedwey insignia, the mark of a Dragon Rider. While the film version is more intricate, being a stylized “e” instead of a mere oval mark, it is composed of gnarly scar tissue, whereas the original was essentially a silvery tattoo.
to:
** Zig-zagged with the gedwey insignia, the mark of a Dragon Rider. While the film version is more intricate, being a stylized “e” "e" instead of a mere oval mark, it is composed of gnarly scar tissue, whereas the original was essentially a silvery tattoo.
Changed line(s) 36 (click to see context) from:
* AdvertisedExtra: Even though he's shown in many promotions and on the poster and the DVD cover, Galbatorix has very little screen time in the film. Justified in that he doesn't do anything in either to movie or book (he doesn't even appear until last book of the series) and Durza is in the role of the [[BigBad main antagonist]] in both book and movie.
to:
* AdvertisedExtra: Even though he's shown in many promotions and on the poster and the DVD cover, Galbatorix has very little screen time in the film. Justified in that he doesn't do anything in either to movie or book (he doesn't even appear until the last book of the series) and Durza is in the role of the [[BigBad main antagonist]] in both book and movie.
Changed line(s) 47 (click to see context) from:
* BadBoss: Durza casually brutalizes and kills his Urgals for failures.
to:
* BadBoss: Durza casually brutalizes and kills his Urgals for failures. He also uses the flames from his dead soldiers to create his GiantFlyer.
Added DiffLines:
* CantTakeCriticism: Galbatorix apparently, since some of the Empire's soldiers attempt to hang Brom for telling the story of Galbatorix's rise to power through wiping out the Dragon Riders.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 3,4 (click to see context) from:
An {{Action}} {{Adventure}} {{Fantasy}} film adaptation of the first book in the ''Literature/InheritanceCycle'', ''Literature/{{Eragon}}'', was made in 2006, starring Ed Speelers as Eragon, Creator/JeremyIrons as Brom, Creator/RachelWeisz as the voice of Saphira and Creator/JohnMalkovich as Galbatorix. Like its contemporary ''Film/TheGoldenCompass'', the movie took considerable liberties, leaving the core story basically intact, but changing countless details from the book. A [[{{VideoGame/Eragon}} video game]] based off the movie was released a month in advance.
to:
An {{Action}} {{Adventure}} {{Action}}-{{Adventure}} {{Fantasy}} film adaptation of the first book in the ''Literature/InheritanceCycle'', ''Literature/{{Eragon}}'', was made in 2006, starring Ed Speelers as Eragon, Creator/JeremyIrons as Brom, Creator/RachelWeisz as the voice of Saphira and Creator/JohnMalkovich as Galbatorix. Like its contemporary ''Film/TheGoldenCompass'', the movie took considerable liberties, leaving the core story basically intact, but changing countless details from the book. A [[{{VideoGame/Eragon}} video game]] based off the movie was released a month in advance.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 3,5 (click to see context) from:
An {{Action}} {{Adventure}} {{Fantasy}} film adaptation of the first book in the ''Literature/InheritanceCycle'', ''Literature/{{Eragon}}'', was made in 2006, starring Ed Speelers as Eragon Creator/JeremyIrons as Brom, Creator/RachelWeisz as the voice of Saphira and Creator/JohnMalkovich as Galbatorix. Like its contemporary ''Film/TheGoldenCompass'', the movie took considerably liberties, leaving the core story basically intact, but changing countless details from the book. A [[{{VideoGame/Eragon}} video game]] based off the movie was released a month in advance.
Currently there are no plans for sequels due to its poor critical and commercial responses, although several, albeit unsuccessful petitions to remake the film have been created.
Currently there are no plans for sequels due to its poor critical and commercial responses, although several, albeit unsuccessful petitions to remake the film have been created.
to:
An {{Action}} {{Adventure}} {{Fantasy}} film adaptation of the first book in the ''Literature/InheritanceCycle'', ''Literature/{{Eragon}}'', was made in 2006, starring Ed Speelers as Eragon Eragon, Creator/JeremyIrons as Brom, Creator/RachelWeisz as the voice of Saphira and Creator/JohnMalkovich as Galbatorix. Like its contemporary ''Film/TheGoldenCompass'', the movie took considerably considerable liberties, leaving the core story basically intact, but changing countless details from the book. A [[{{VideoGame/Eragon}} video game]] based off the movie was released a month in advance.
Currently Currently, there are no plans for sequels due to its poor critical and commercial responses, although several, albeit unsuccessful petitions to remake the film have been created.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 49 (click to see context) from:
* BattleCry: “Into the sky, to win or die!”
to:
* BattleCry: “Into "Into the sky, to win or die!”die!"
Changed line(s) 57 (click to see context) from:
-->'''Eragon''': That's for Brom! I expected ''more''.
to:
-->'''Eragon''': [[AndThisIsFor That's for Brom! Brom]]! I expected ''more''.
Added DiffLines:
* CoversAlwaysLie: The posters for the film frequently show Eragon with Zar'roc. He doesn't use it until the third act of the film; Brom uses it until [[spoiler:he gets killed and [[TakeUpMySword gives it to Eragon]].]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* TheWormThatWalks: The Ra'zac in the film are composed of thousands of bugs that form a pair of ninja-like humanoid figures. When [[spoiler:Brom kills one of them, the figure dissolves into the bugs that composed it.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 64 (click to see context) from:
** The Ra'zac. In the book, they survive their encounter with Eragon and Brom, [[spoiler:personally killing the latter and only dying in the ''third'' book]]. Here, they are killed halfway through when Eragon hangs one and Brom stabs the other with Zar'roc.
to:
** The Ra'zac. In the book, they survive their encounter with Eragon and Brom, [[spoiler:personally killing the latter and only dying continuing as major antagonists until their death in the ''third'' book]]. Here, they are killed halfway through when Eragon hangs one and Brom stabs the other with Zar'roc.
Changed line(s) 77 (click to see context) from:
* InNameOnly: Despite being a common complaint, this is actually subverted. While it does seem like there was some sort of mission to change as many details as possible, the core story is kept basically intact.
to:
* InNameOnly: Despite being a common complaint, this is actually subverted. While it does seem like there was some sort of mission to change as many Innumerable details as possible, were changed, some of which would cause major plot issues later in the core story (if sequels had ever been made), but the basic plot is kept basically more or less intact.
Changed line(s) 91,92 (click to see context) from:
* OrcusOnHisThrone: It says a lot about Galbatorix that his appearance in this film is actually an addition to his appearances in the books.
* PlotRelevantAgeUp: Inexplicably, Saphira, who magically ages from an infant to a full grown adult in a matter of seconds.
* PlotRelevantAgeUp: Inexplicably, Saphira, who magically ages from an infant to a full grown adult in a matter of seconds.
to:
* OrcusOnHisThrone: It says a lot about Galbatorix that his very minor appearance in this film is actually an addition to his appearances in the books.
* PlotRelevantAgeUp:Inexplicably, Saphira, who In one of the most contentious change from the books, Saphira magically ages from an infant to a full grown adult in a matter of seconds.seconds after flying into a storm cloud, and no further explanation is ever offered (compared to the books where she slowly grows over time).
* PlotRelevantAgeUp:
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 3,4 (click to see context) from:
An {{Action}} {{Adventure}} {{Fantasy}} film adaptation of the first book in the ''Literature/InheritanceCycle'', ''Literature/{{Eragon}}'', was made in 2006, starring Ed Speelers as Eragon Creator/JeremyIrons as Brom, Creator/RachelWeisz as the voice of s Saphira and Creator/JohnMalkovich Galbatorix. Like its contemporary ''Film/TheGoldenCompass'', the movie took considerably liberties, leaving the core story basically intact, but changing countless details from the book. A [[{{VideoGame/Eragon}} video game]] based off the movie was released a month in advance.
to:
An {{Action}} {{Adventure}} {{Fantasy}} film adaptation of the first book in the ''Literature/InheritanceCycle'', ''Literature/{{Eragon}}'', was made in 2006, starring Ed Speelers as Eragon Creator/JeremyIrons as Brom, Creator/RachelWeisz as the voice of s Saphira and Creator/JohnMalkovich as Galbatorix. Like its contemporary ''Film/TheGoldenCompass'', the movie took considerably liberties, leaving the core story basically intact, but changing countless details from the book. A [[{{VideoGame/Eragon}} video game]] based off the movie was released a month in advance.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 3,4 (click to see context) from:
A {{Action}} {{Adventure}} {{Fantasy}} film adaptation of the first book in the ''Literature/InheritanceCycle'', ''Literature/{{Eragon}}'', was made in 2006, starring Creator/JeremyIrons, Ed Speelers, and Creator/JohnMalkovich. Like its contemporary ''Film/TheGoldenCompass'', the movie took considerably liberties, leaving the core story basically intact, but changing countless details from the book. A [[{{VideoGame/Eragon}} video game]] based off the movie was released a month in advance.
to:
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 3,4 (click to see context) from:
A film adaptation of the first book in the ''Literature/InheritanceCycle'', ''Literature/{{Eragon}}'', was made in 2006, starring Creator/JeremyIrons, Ed Speelers, and Creator/JohnMalkovich. Like its contemporary ''Film/TheGoldenCompass'', the movie took considerably liberties, leaving the core story basically intact, but changing countless details from the book. A [[{{VideoGame/Eragon}} video game]] based off the movie was released a month in advance.
to:
A {{Action}} {{Adventure}} {{Fantasy}} film adaptation of the first book in the ''Literature/InheritanceCycle'', ''Literature/{{Eragon}}'', was made in 2006, starring Creator/JeremyIrons, Ed Speelers, and Creator/JohnMalkovich. Like its contemporary ''Film/TheGoldenCompass'', the movie took considerably liberties, leaving the core story basically intact, but changing countless details from the book. A [[{{VideoGame/Eragon}} video game]] based off the movie was released a month in advance.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 1,2 (click to see context) from:
[[quoteright:300:https://static.tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pub/images/Eragon_Poster_3981.jpg]]
to:
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
cross-wicking
Added DiffLines:
* AdaptationalTimespanChange: In the book, the story takes place over months to give Saphira time to grow up. In the movie, time is compressed to a matter of weeks so a magical age-up was introduced.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 58 (click to see context) from:
* CaptainObvious: Saphira, ''constantly''.
to:
* CaptainObvious: Saphira, ''constantly''.Saphira's dialogue mostly consists of over-explaining things that were usually already explained or don't need to be.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 3,4 (click to see context) from:
A film adaptation of the first book in the ''Literature/InheritanceCycle'', ''Literature/{{Eragon}}'', was made in 2006, starring Creator/JeremyIrons, Ed Speelers, and Creator/JohnMalkovich. Like it's contemporary ''Film/TheGoldenCompass'', the movie took considerably liberties, leaving the core story basically intact, but changing countless details from the book. A [[{{VideoGame/Eragon}} video game]] based off the movie was released a month in advance.
to:
A film adaptation of the first book in the ''Literature/InheritanceCycle'', ''Literature/{{Eragon}}'', was made in 2006, starring Creator/JeremyIrons, Ed Speelers, and Creator/JohnMalkovich. Like it's its contemporary ''Film/TheGoldenCompass'', the movie took considerably liberties, leaving the core story basically intact, but changing countless details from the book. A [[{{VideoGame/Eragon}} video game]] based off the movie was released a month in advance.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 3,4 (click to see context) from:
A film adaptation of the first book in the ''Literature/InheritanceCycle'', ''Literature/{{Eragon}}'', was made in 2006, starring Creator/JeremyIrons, Ed Speelers, and Creator/JohnMalkovich. Like ''Film/TheGoldenCompass'', it was very loosely based on the book. A [[{{VideoGame/Eragon}} video game]] based off the movie was released a month in advance.
to:
A film adaptation of the first book in the ''Literature/InheritanceCycle'', ''Literature/{{Eragon}}'', was made in 2006, starring Creator/JeremyIrons, Ed Speelers, and Creator/JohnMalkovich. Like it's contemporary ''Film/TheGoldenCompass'', it was very loosely based on the movie took considerably liberties, leaving the core story basically intact, but changing countless details from the book. A [[{{VideoGame/Eragon}} video game]] based off the movie was released a month in advance.
Changed line(s) 76 (click to see context) from:
* InNameOnly: Despite being a common complaint, this is actually subverted. Despite the countless changes made during adaptation, the movie is still clearly following the plot of the book.
to:
* InNameOnly: Despite being a common complaint, this is actually subverted. Despite While it does seem like there was some sort of mission to change as many details as possible, the countless changes made during adaptation, the movie core story is still clearly following the plot of the book.kept basically intact.
Deleted line(s) 104 (click to see context) :
* TheyChangedItNowItSucks: When there numerous adaptational changes that have major world building, story, or character implications, complaints about ultimately minor details, like the fact that Saphira has {{feathered|dragons}} wings instead of the leathery ones of the book, can come across this way.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 15,16 (click to see context) from:
** The Ra'Zac from the books are an ancient, inhuman race with a combination of insectoid and avian traits. In stark contrast, their versions from the film look like and are even implied to be just human zombies animated through magic by Durza.
** The Urgals seem to be here a regular tribe of barbarians, as nothing on their appearances hints they are supposed to be other than humans.
** The Urgals seem to be here a regular tribe of barbarians, as nothing on their appearances hints they are supposed to be other than humans.
to:
** The Ra'Zac from the books are an already extant, ancient, inhuman race with that has been hunted to near extinction by humans over hundreds of years, having a combination of insectoid and avian traits. In stark contrast, their versions the movie, they summoned by Durza and rise up from the film look ground, looking like and are even implied to be just human zombies animated through magic like some sort of dirty zombie mummy humanoids, apparantly created by Durza.
magic.
** The Urgalsseem to be here a regular tribe of barbarians, in the book are described as tall, large, grey-skinned {{Horned Humanoid}}s, basically something like an Orc. In the movie nothing on about their appearances hints appearance implies that they are supposed inhuman, instead basically looking like human barbarians. Apparently it was decided that make up or CGI to be other match the book was too expensive and time consuming.
** All of the dwarves and elves are indistinguishable from humans. Elves lack pointed ears and dwarves are not shorter thanhumans.humans, which can make it hard to tell if they're even supposed
** The Urgals
** All of the dwarves and elves are indistinguishable from humans. Elves lack pointed ears and dwarves are not shorter than
Changed line(s) 18,20 (click to see context) from:
** The Ra'Zac in the books are wingless, insectoid birdmen, which makes them horrifying but still clearly recognizable as lifeforms and even elegant compared to other monsters. In the film, their bodies are putrid and literally decaying, and carry corpse fauna around.
** The Urgals here are humans with tattoos rather than horned orcs.
** Zig-zagged with the gedwey insignia, the mark of a Dragon Rider. While the film version is more intrincate, being a stylized “e” instead of a mere oval mark, it is composed of gnarly scar tissue, whereas the original was essentially a silvery tattoo.
** The Urgals here are humans with tattoos rather than horned orcs.
** Zig-zagged with the gedwey insignia, the mark of a Dragon Rider. While the film version is more intrincate, being a stylized “e” instead of a mere oval mark, it is composed of gnarly scar tissue, whereas the original was essentially a silvery tattoo.
to:
** The Ra'Zac in the books are wingless, insectoid birdmen, which makes them are intended to be horrifying but still clearly recognizable as lifeforms and even elegant compared to other monsters. lifeforms. In the film, their bodies they are putrid and literally decaying, and carry corpse fauna around.
some sort of rotting dirty TheWormThatWalks slash mummy creatures.
** The Urgals here are humans with tattoos rather than hornedorcs.
orcs. Although how attractive they were in the first place is a seperate question.
** Zig-zagged with the gedwey insignia, the mark of a Dragon Rider. While the film version is moreintrincate, intricate, being a stylized “e” instead of a mere oval mark, it is composed of gnarly scar tissue, whereas the original was essentially a silvery tattoo.
** The Urgals here are humans with tattoos rather than horned
** Zig-zagged with the gedwey insignia, the mark of a Dragon Rider. While the film version is more
Changed line(s) 34 (click to see context) from:
* AdvertisedExtra: Even though he's shown in many promotions and on the poster and the DVD cover, Galbatorix has very little screen time in the film. Justified in that he does not appear until the very last book of the series while Durza is in the role of the [[BigBad main antagonist]].
to:
* AdvertisedExtra: Even though he's shown in many promotions and on the poster and the DVD cover, Galbatorix has very little screen time in the film. Justified in that he does not doesn't do anything in either to movie or book (he doesn't even appear until the very last book of the series while series) and Durza is in the role of the [[BigBad main antagonist]].antagonist]] in both book and movie.
Changed line(s) 75,82 (click to see context) from:
* InNameOnly: Where do we start?!
** The Ra'zac are ''very'' different to their book counterparts. In the book they are described as tall, insectoid vulture-like creatures in black cloaks. In the movie, they are literally ninja mummies covered in maggots.
** Dragons always had the "leather wings" descriptor somewhere near them in the books. In the film, for some nameless, incomprehensible reason, Saphira has ''{{feathered|dragons}} wings''.
** The Urgals in the book are described as tall, large, grey-skinned {{Horned Humanoid}}s. In the movie, they are pretty much ugly human barbarians with tattoos.
** Like the Urgals, the characters that are dwarves or elves in the book all look completely human.
** In the book, Eragon and Arya are described as dark-haired and black-haired, respectively. In the movie, he's blond and she's red-headed.
** Justified with Galbatorix: in the novels, he doesn't show up in person until the final book, which had not been published yet at the time. Then again, the fact that he shows up in the movie at all is a pretty significant difference from the book...
** Angela bears little resemblance to her book counterpart, being portrayed as a mystical fortuneteller rather than an eccentric GeniusDitz herbalist.
** The Ra'zac are ''very'' different to their book counterparts. In the book they are described as tall, insectoid vulture-like creatures in black cloaks. In the movie, they are literally ninja mummies covered in maggots.
** Dragons always had the "leather wings" descriptor somewhere near them in the books. In the film, for some nameless, incomprehensible reason, Saphira has ''{{feathered|dragons}} wings''.
** The Urgals in the book are described as tall, large, grey-skinned {{Horned Humanoid}}s. In the movie, they are pretty much ugly human barbarians with tattoos.
** Like the Urgals, the characters that are dwarves or elves in the book all look completely human.
** In the book, Eragon and Arya are described as dark-haired and black-haired, respectively. In the movie, he's blond and she's red-headed.
** Justified with Galbatorix: in the novels, he doesn't show up in person until the final book, which had not been published yet at the time. Then again, the fact that he shows up in the movie at all is a pretty significant difference from the book...
** Angela bears little resemblance to her book counterpart, being portrayed as a mystical fortuneteller rather than an eccentric GeniusDitz herbalist.
to:
* InNameOnly: Where do we start?!
** The Ra'zac are ''very'' different to their book counterparts. InDespite being a common complaint, this is actually subverted. Despite the book they are described as tall, insectoid vulture-like creatures in black cloaks. In the movie, they are literally ninja mummies covered in maggots.
** Dragons always had the "leather wings" descriptor somewhere near them in the books. In the film, for some nameless, incomprehensible reason, Saphira has ''{{feathered|dragons}} wings''.
** The Urgals in the book are described as tall, large, grey-skinned {{Horned Humanoid}}s. In the movie, they are pretty much ugly human barbarians with tattoos.
** Like the Urgals, the characters that are dwarves or elves in the book all look completely human.
** In the book, Eragon and Arya are described as dark-haired and black-haired, respectively. In the movie, he's blond and she's red-headed.
** Justified with Galbatorix: in the novels, he doesn't show up in person until the final book, which had not been published yet at the time. Then again, the fact that he shows up incountless changes made during adaptation, the movie at all is a pretty significant difference from still clearly following the book...
** Angela bears little resemblance to her book counterpart, being portrayed as a mystical fortuneteller rather than an eccentric GeniusDitz herbalist.plot of the book.
** The Ra'zac are ''very'' different to their book counterparts. In
** Dragons always had the "leather wings" descriptor somewhere near them in the books. In the film, for some nameless, incomprehensible reason, Saphira has ''{{feathered|dragons}} wings''.
** The Urgals in the book are described as tall, large, grey-skinned {{Horned Humanoid}}s. In the movie, they are pretty much ugly human barbarians with tattoos.
** Like the Urgals, the characters that are dwarves or elves in the book all look completely human.
** In the book, Eragon and Arya are described as dark-haired and black-haired, respectively. In the movie, he's blond and she's red-headed.
** Justified with Galbatorix: in the novels, he doesn't show up in person until the final book, which had not been published yet at the time. Then again, the fact that he shows up in
** Angela bears little resemblance to her book counterpart, being portrayed as a mystical fortuneteller rather than an eccentric GeniusDitz herbalist.
Added DiffLines:
* TheyChangedItNowItSucks: When there numerous adaptational changes that have major world building, story, or character implications, complaints about ultimately minor details, like the fact that Saphira has {{feathered|dragons}} wings instead of the leathery ones of the book, can come across this way.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Deleted line(s) 97 (click to see context) :
* OurElvesAreBetter: Averted. Galbatorix mentions elves outside his empire, but it's not clear whether or not Arya is even supposed to be an elf in the movie.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 3,4 (click to see context) from:
A film adaptation of the first book in the ''Literature/InheritanceCycle'', ''Literature/{{Eragon}}'', was made in 2006, starring Creator/JeremyIrons, Creator/EdSpeelers, and Creator/JohnMalkovich. Like ''Film/TheGoldenCompass'', it was very loosely based on the book. A [[{{VideoGame/Eragon}} video game]] based off the movie was released a month in advance.
to:
A film adaptation of the first book in the ''Literature/InheritanceCycle'', ''Literature/{{Eragon}}'', was made in 2006, starring Creator/JeremyIrons, Creator/EdSpeelers, Ed Speelers, and Creator/JohnMalkovich. Like ''Film/TheGoldenCompass'', it was very loosely based on the book. A [[{{VideoGame/Eragon}} video game]] based off the movie was released a month in advance.
Changed line(s) 11,14 (click to see context) from:
** Durza himself is made a more competent and resourceful character. In the books, he struggled in a duel against an untrained Eragon, got easily fooled by BlatantLies about Eragon's true name, had to retreat every time Saphira joined in scene, and was even temporarily killed by a regular arrow. Meanwhile, in the movie he seems in control all the time, never loses a fight until the final battle, and even takes out Saphira without breaking a sweat by creating a shadow creature even more powerful than her.
* AdaptationalHeroism: In the books, Sloan voluntarily told the Ra'zac about Eragon out of spite and knowing they would probably kill or kidnap him. His version from the film is still a jerkass to him, but only tells the Ra'zac about the stone after being horrifically tortured.
* AdaptationalPersonalityChange: Arya is a notable example. In the books she's rather aloof and stoic, is a bit of a loner, and does not reciprocate Eragon's feelings in the slightest. Here, she's much friendlier and more expressive, and even seems to warm to Eragon very quickly, even expressing a hope they'll see each other again soon.
* AdaptationalUgliness: The gedwey insignia, the mark of a Dragon Rider. While the film version is more intrincate, being a stylized “e” instead of a mere oval mark, it is composed of gnarly scar tissue, whereas the original was essentially a silvery tattoo.
* AdaptationalHeroism: In the books, Sloan voluntarily told the Ra'zac about Eragon out of spite and knowing they would probably kill or kidnap him. His version from the film is still a jerkass to him, but only tells the Ra'zac about the stone after being horrifically tortured.
* AdaptationalPersonalityChange: Arya is a notable example. In the books she's rather aloof and stoic, is a bit of a loner, and does not reciprocate Eragon's feelings in the slightest. Here, she's much friendlier and more expressive, and even seems to warm to Eragon very quickly, even expressing a hope they'll see each other again soon.
* AdaptationalUgliness: The gedwey insignia, the mark of a Dragon Rider. While the film version is more intrincate, being a stylized “e” instead of a mere oval mark, it is composed of gnarly scar tissue, whereas the original was essentially a silvery tattoo.
to:
** Durza himself is made a much more competent and resourceful character. In the books, he struggled in a duel against an untrained Eragon, got easily fooled by BlatantLies about Eragon's true name, had to retreat every time Saphira joined in the scene, and was even temporarily killed by a regular arrow. Meanwhile, in the movie he seems in control all the time, never loses a fight until the final battle, and even takes out Saphira without breaking a sweat by creating a shadow creature even more powerful than her.
* AdaptationalHeroism: In the books, Sloan voluntarily told the Ra'zac aboutEragon Eragon, purely out of spite and knowing they would probably kill or kidnap him. His version from the film is still a jerkass to him, but only tells the Ra'zac about the stone after being horrifically tortured.
tortured, which could even imply he actively tried to withhold the information from them in order ''not'' to endanger Eragon and his household.
* AdaptationalPersonalityChange: Arya is a notable example. In the books she's rather aloof and stoic, is a bit of a loner, and does not reciprocate Eragon's feelings in the slightest. Here, she's much friendlier and moreexpressive, expressive and even seems to warm to Eragon very quickly, even expressing a hope they'll see each other again soon.
soon.
*AdaptationalUgliness: AdaptationalSpeciesChange:
** The Ra'Zac from the books are an ancient, inhuman race with a combination of insectoid and avian traits. In stark contrast, their versions from the film look like and are even implied to be just human zombies animated through magic by Durza.
** The Urgals seem to be here a regular tribe of barbarians, as nothing on their appearances hints they are supposed to be other than humans.
* AdaptationalUgliness:
** The Ra'Zac in the books are wingless, insectoid birdmen, which makes them horrifying but still clearly recognizable as lifeforms and even elegant compared to other monsters. In the film, their bodies are putrid and literally decaying, and carry corpse fauna around.
** The Urgals here are humans with tattoos rather than horned orcs.
** Zig-zagged with the gedwey insignia, the mark of a Dragon Rider. While the film version is more intrincate, being a stylized “e” instead of a mere oval mark, it is composed of gnarly scar tissue, whereas the original was essentially a silvery tattoo.
* AdaptationalHeroism: In the books, Sloan voluntarily told the Ra'zac about
* AdaptationalPersonalityChange: Arya is a notable example. In the books she's rather aloof and stoic, is a bit of a loner, and does not reciprocate Eragon's feelings in the slightest. Here, she's much friendlier and more
*
** The Ra'Zac from the books are an ancient, inhuman race with a combination of insectoid and avian traits. In stark contrast, their versions from the film look like and are even implied to be just human zombies animated through magic by Durza.
** The Urgals seem to be here a regular tribe of barbarians, as nothing on their appearances hints they are supposed to be other than humans.
* AdaptationalUgliness:
** The Ra'Zac in the books are wingless, insectoid birdmen, which makes them horrifying but still clearly recognizable as lifeforms and even elegant compared to other monsters. In the film, their bodies are putrid and literally decaying, and carry corpse fauna around.
** The Urgals here are humans with tattoos rather than horned orcs.
** Zig-zagged with the gedwey insignia, the mark of a Dragon Rider. While the film version is more intrincate, being a stylized “e” instead of a mere oval mark, it is composed of gnarly scar tissue, whereas the original was essentially a silvery tattoo.
Changed line(s) 16 (click to see context) from:
** The Empire. Though they're the villains in the books as well, they're much more blatantly evil in the film. For example, in the first book, the worst thing the Empire did to Carvahall was raise their taxes, but it was otherwise a peaceful and prosperous village. Here, Carvahall looks like an utterly wretched place to live, with the Empire's guards [[BigBrotherIsWatchingYou keeping tabs on everyone]], bullying people and even trying to beat up Brom merely for speaking about the old Riders; they also conscript people into the army as soon as they come of age (which is why Roran leaves Carvahall in the film, to avoid being forced to fight).
to:
** The Empire. Though they're the villains in the books as well, they're much more blatantly evil in the film. For example, in the first book, the worst thing the Empire did to Carvahall was raise their taxes, but it the place was otherwise a peaceful and prosperous village. Here, Carvahall looks like an utterly wretched place to live, with the Empire's guards [[BigBrotherIsWatchingYou keeping tabs on everyone]], bullying people and even trying to beat up Brom merely for speaking about the old Riders; they also conscript people into the army as soon as they come of age (which is why Roran leaves Carvahall in the film, to avoid being forced to fight).
Changed line(s) 20 (click to see context) from:
** Played straight with the Ra'zac. They lack the strong exoskeletons and poisonous breath of their book counterparts, do not use [[PoisonedWeapons Seithr]] [[HollywoodAcid oil-coated]] weapons, and both are taken down in a short fight with Eragon and Brom.
to:
** Played straight with the Ra'zac. They lack the strong exoskeletons and poisonous breath of their book counterparts, do not use [[PoisonedWeapons Seithr]] [[HollywoodAcid oil-coated]] weapons, and are both are taken down in a short fight with Eragon and Brom.
Changed line(s) 22,23 (click to see context) from:
** Arya is the most prominent example, barely resembling her book counterpart at all - in the books she's raven-haired and green-eyed with pointed ears, while in the film she's a blue-eyed redhead and doesn't have pointed ears.
** Eragon in the books has brown hair and eyes; in the film he's got blue eyes and blonde hair.
** Eragon in the books has brown hair and eyes; in the film he's got blue eyes and blonde hair.
to:
** Arya is the most prominent example, barely resembling her book counterpart at all - in the books she's raven-haired and green-eyed with pointed ears, while in the film film, she's a blue-eyed redhead and doesn't have pointed ears.
** Eragon in the books hasbrown dark hair and eyes; in the film he's got blue eyes and blonde hair.
** Eragon in the books has
Changed line(s) 25,26 (click to see context) from:
** Durza's eyes are described as maroon in the books, but for the film, it's changed to an extremely pale color.
* AdaptationOriginConnection: In the film, Durza "summons" the Ra'zac from pits in his lair. In the books, Durza and them never interact with each other and are completely unrelated in terms of character.
* AdaptationOriginConnection: In the film, Durza "summons" the Ra'zac from pits in his lair. In the books, Durza and them never interact with each other and are completely unrelated in terms of character.
to:
** Durza's eyes are described as maroon in the books, but for the film, film it's changed to an extremely pale color.
* AdaptationOriginConnection: In the film, Durza "summons" the Ra'zac from pits in his lair. In the books, Durza and them never interact with each other and are completely unrelatedin terms other than being all servants of character.Galbatorix.
* AdaptationOriginConnection: In the film, Durza "summons" the Ra'zac from pits in his lair. In the books, Durza and them never interact with each other and are completely unrelated
Changed line(s) 34 (click to see context) from:
* AmbiguouslyHuman: It's unclear if any of the non-humans from the book are still non-human here, they all just look like humans in different clothes and their race is never mentioned.
to:
* AmbiguouslyHuman: It's unclear if any of the non-humans from the book are still non-human here, as they all just look like humans in different clothes and their race is never mentioned.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 3,4 (click to see context) from:
A film adaptation of the first book in the ''Literature/InheritanceCycle'', ''Literature/{{Eragon}}'', was made in 2006, starring Creator/JeremyIrons, Ed Speelers, and Creator/JohnMalkovich. Like ''Film/TheGoldenCompass'', it was very loosely based on the book. A [[{{VideoGame/Eragon}} video game]] based off the movie was released a month in advance.
to:
A film adaptation of the first book in the ''Literature/InheritanceCycle'', ''Literature/{{Eragon}}'', was made in 2006, starring Creator/JeremyIrons, Ed Speelers, Creator/EdSpeelers, and Creator/JohnMalkovich. Like ''Film/TheGoldenCompass'', it was very loosely based on the book. A [[{{VideoGame/Eragon}} video game]] based off the movie was released a month in advance.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* BoomHeadshot: Eragon finishes his first duel with Durza by shooting him in the head, only for Durza to teleport away.
Added DiffLines:
* OffscreenTeleportation: How else does [[spoiler:Brom]] get from the Beor Mountains to Gil'ead, crossing hundreds of miles without a dragon, just in time to save Eragon?
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Badass Grandpa cleaning
Deleted line(s) 39 (click to see context) :
* BadassGrandpa: Age has not dulled Brom's skill in the slightest, as he personally takes down a Ra'zac.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Added DiffLines:
* MindOverMatter: Durza starts off his first WizardDuel with Eragon by using his powers to throw an armory's worth of weapons at him, then parts of the wall.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
** Durza's eyes are described as maroon in the books, but for the film, it's changed to an extremely pale color.
* AmbitionIsEvil: In this version, Galbatorix was hungry for power and seized control of Alagaesia because he saw an opportunity in the Riders' weakness.
Deleted line(s) 88 (click to see context) :
* PyrrhicVictory: Narrowly averted when Eragon stabs Durza through the heart and it looks like he's going to fall to his death, but Saphira catches him in time.
Added DiffLines:
* PyrrhicVictory: Narrowly averted when Eragon stabs Durza through the heart and it looks like he's going to fall to his death, but Saphira catches him in time.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
* AdaptationalAttractiveness: Angela. The books don't go out of their way to describe her, but they paint her clearly as a short woman with nothing more physically remarkable than a cute smile. Her film version, on the other hand, is a gorgeous woman with sensuous manners and dressed like an oriental dancer.
Changed line(s) 10,13 (click to see context) from:
** Durza himself is made a more competent and resourceful character. In the books, he was easily fooled by an untrained Eragon, had to retreat every time Saphira joined in scene, and was even temporarily killed by a regular arrow. Meanwhile, in the movie he seems in control all the time, never loses a fight until the final battle, and even takes out Saphira without breaking a sweat by creating a shadow creature more powerful than her.
* AdaptationalHeroism: In the books, Sloan voluntarily told the Ra'zac about Eragon out of spite and knowing they would probably kill or kidnap him. His version from the film is still a jerkass towards him, but only tells the Ra'zac about the stone after being horrifically tortured.
* AdaptationalPersonalityChange: Arya is a notable example. In the books she's rather aloof and a loner, and does not reciprocate Eragon's feelings in the slightest. Here, she's much friendlier and seems to warm to Eragon very quickly, even expressing a hope they'll see each other again soon.
* AdaptationalUgliness: The gedwey insignia, the mark of a Dragon Rider. The books version is a silvery oval; here, it’s a “e” composed of scar tissue.
* AdaptationalHeroism: In the books, Sloan voluntarily told the Ra'zac about Eragon out of spite and knowing they would probably kill or kidnap him. His version from the film is still a jerkass towards him, but only tells the Ra'zac about the stone after being horrifically tortured.
* AdaptationalPersonalityChange: Arya is a notable example. In the books she's rather aloof and a loner, and does not reciprocate Eragon's feelings in the slightest. Here, she's much friendlier and seems to warm to Eragon very quickly, even expressing a hope they'll see each other again soon.
* AdaptationalUgliness: The gedwey insignia, the mark of a Dragon Rider. The books version is a silvery oval; here, it’s a “e” composed of scar tissue.
to:
** Durza himself is made a more competent and resourceful character. In the books, he was easily fooled by struggled in a duel against an untrained Eragon, got easily fooled by BlatantLies about Eragon's true name, had to retreat every time Saphira joined in scene, and was even temporarily killed by a regular arrow. Meanwhile, in the movie he seems in control all the time, never loses a fight until the final battle, and even takes out Saphira without breaking a sweat by creating a shadow creature even more powerful than her.
* AdaptationalHeroism: In the books, Sloan voluntarily told the Ra'zac about Eragon out of spite and knowing they would probably kill or kidnap him. His version from the film is still a jerkasstowards to him, but only tells the Ra'zac about the stone after being horrifically tortured.
* AdaptationalPersonalityChange: Arya is a notable example. In the books she's rather aloof and stoic, is a bit of a loner, and does not reciprocate Eragon's feelings in the slightest. Here, she's much friendlier and more expressive, and even seems to warm to Eragon very quickly, even expressing a hope they'll see each other again soon.
* AdaptationalUgliness: The gedwey insignia, the mark of a Dragon Rider.The books While the film version is more intrincate, being a silvery oval; here, it’s a stylized “e” instead of a mere oval mark, it is composed of gnarly scar tissue.tissue, whereas the original was essentially a silvery tattoo.
* AdaptationalHeroism: In the books, Sloan voluntarily told the Ra'zac about Eragon out of spite and knowing they would probably kill or kidnap him. His version from the film is still a jerkass
* AdaptationalPersonalityChange: Arya is a notable example. In the books she's rather aloof and stoic, is a bit of a loner, and does not reciprocate Eragon's feelings in the slightest. Here, she's much friendlier and more expressive, and even seems to warm to Eragon very quickly, even expressing a hope they'll see each other again soon.
* AdaptationalUgliness: The gedwey insignia, the mark of a Dragon Rider.
Changed line(s) 16 (click to see context) from:
** Galbatorix himself. The film leaves out his FreudianExcuse of losing his dragon and being driven mad by the loss.
to:
** Galbatorix himself. The film leaves out his FreudianExcuse of losing his dragon and being driven mad by the loss.loss and makes apparent that he is evil just because.
Changed line(s) 21 (click to see context) from:
** Arya is the most prominent example, barely resembling her book counterpart at all - in the books she's raven-haired and green-eyed with pointed ears. In the film, she's a blue-eyed redhead and doesn't have pointed ears.
to:
** Arya is the most prominent example, barely resembling her book counterpart at all - in the books she's raven-haired and green-eyed with pointed ears. In ears, while in the film, film she's a blue-eyed redhead and doesn't have pointed ears.
Changed line(s) 23 (click to see context) from:
** Brom is yet another example (detailed under AgeLift).
to:
** Brom is yet another example example, as he looks substantially younger than his film book and has shorter hair and beard (detailed under AgeLift).
Changed line(s) 44 (click to see context) from:
* BlingOfWar: Unlike in the books, where the Varden are portrayed as having barely enough money to finance themselves, in the movie even the lowliest soldier looks like they're trying to blind the Urgals with their collective fabulousness.
to:
* BlingOfWar: Unlike in the books, where the Varden are portrayed as having barely enough money to finance themselves, in the movie even the lowliest soldier looks like they're seems to be trying to blind the Urgals with their collective fabulousness.through sheer bling.
Changed line(s) 51 (click to see context) from:
* DarkIsEvil: As if we needed more clues, Galbatorix's [[spoiler: dragon]] is jet-black.
to:
* DarkIsEvil: As if we needed more clues, Galbatorix's [[spoiler: dragon]] [[spoiler:dragon]] is jet-black.
Changed line(s) 53 (click to see context) from:
** The Ra'zac. In the book, they survive their encounter with Eragon and Brom, [[spoiler:personally killing the latter and dying in the third book]]. Here, they are killed halfway through when Eragon hangs one and Brom stabs the other with Zar'roc.
to:
** The Ra'zac. In the book, they survive their encounter with Eragon and Brom, [[spoiler:personally killing the latter and only dying in the third ''third'' book]]. Here, they are killed halfway through when Eragon hangs one and Brom stabs the other with Zar'roc.
Changed line(s) 58 (click to see context) from:
* FeatheredDragons: One of the movie's numerous and... divisive departures from the novel gives Saphira enormous birdlike wings.
to:
* FeatheredDragons: One of the movie's numerous and... divisive ''divisive'' departures from the novel gives Saphira enormous birdlike wings.
Changed line(s) 67 (click to see context) from:
** The Ra'zac are ''very'' different to their book counterparts. In the book they are described as tall, skeletal vulture-like creatures in black cloaks. In the movie, they are literally ninja mummies covered in maggots.
to:
** The Ra'zac are ''very'' different to their book counterparts. In the book they are described as tall, skeletal insectoid vulture-like creatures in black cloaks. In the movie, they are literally ninja mummies covered in maggots.
Changed line(s) 73 (click to see context) from:
** Angela bears little resemblance to her book counterpart, being portrayed as a mystic fortuneteller rather than an eccentric GeniusDitz herbalist.
to:
** Angela bears little resemblance to her book counterpart, being portrayed as a mystic mystical fortuneteller rather than an eccentric GeniusDitz herbalist.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 68 (click to see context) from:
** Dragons always had the "leather wings" descriptor somewhere near them in the books. In the film, for some nameless, incomprehensible reason, Saphira has ''{{feathered |dragons}}wings''.
to:
** Dragons always had the "leather wings" descriptor somewhere near them in the books. In the film, for some nameless, incomprehensible reason, Saphira has ''{{feathered |dragons}}wings''.''{{feathered|dragons}} wings''.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
This version counts more as a Bond One Liner, since Eragon says it after killing Durza.
Changed line(s) 10 (click to see context) from:
** Durza himself is made a more competent and resourceful character. In the books, he was easily fooled by an untrained Eragon, had to retreat every time Saphira joined in scene, and was even temporarily killed by a regular arrow. Meanwhile, in the movie he seems in control all the time, never loses a fight until the final battle, and even takes out Saphira without breaking a swet by creating a shadow creature more powerful than her.
to:
** Durza himself is made a more competent and resourceful character. In the books, he was easily fooled by an untrained Eragon, had to retreat every time Saphira joined in scene, and was even temporarily killed by a regular arrow. Meanwhile, in the movie he seems in control all the time, never loses a fight until the final battle, and even takes out Saphira without breaking a swet sweat by creating a shadow creature more powerful than her.
* BondOneLiner: From Eragon to Durza, doubles as an IronicEcho.
-->'''Eragon''': That's for Brom! I expected ''more''.
-->'''Eragon''': That's for Brom! I expected ''more''.
* ChekhovsSkill: Flying from the tail, which Eragon uses during the FinalBattle to deceive Durza.
Changed line(s) 49 (click to see context) from:
* DeathByAdaptation: The Ra'zac. In the book, they survive their encounter with Eragon and Brom, [[spoiler:personally killing the latter and dying in the third book]]. Here, they are killed halfway through when Eragon hangs one and Brom stabs the other with Zar'roc.
to:
* DeathByAdaptation: DeathByAdaptation:
** The Ra'zac. In the book, they survive their encounter with Eragon and Brom, [[spoiler:personally killing the latter and dying in the third book]]. Here, they are killed halfway through when Eragon hangs one and Brom stabs the other withZar'roc.Zar'roc.
** Garrow is of the "died earlier than in the source material" type. In the book, he lingers for several days before dying of his injuries. Here, he's found killed by the Ra'zac.
** The Ra'zac. In the book, they survive their encounter with Eragon and Brom, [[spoiler:personally killing the latter and dying in the third book]]. Here, they are killed halfway through when Eragon hangs one and Brom stabs the other with
** Garrow is of the "died earlier than in the source material" type. In the book, he lingers for several days before dying of his injuries. Here, he's found killed by the Ra'zac.
Changed line(s) 82,83 (click to see context) from:
* PreMortemOneLiner: From Eragon to Durza, doubles as an IronicEcho.
-->'''Eragon''': That's for Brom! I expected ''more''.
-->'''Eragon''': That's for Brom! I expected ''more''.
to:
* PreMortemOneLiner: From PyrrhicVictory: Narrowly averted when Eragon stabs Durza through the heart and it looks like he's going to Durza, doubles as an IronicEcho.
-->'''Eragon''': That's for Brom! I expected ''more''.fall to his death, but Saphira catches him in time.
-->'''Eragon''': That's for Brom! I expected ''more''.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 13 (click to see context) from:
* AdaptationalVillainy: The Empire. Though they're the villains in the books as well, they're much more blatantly evil in the film. For example, in the first book, the worst thing the Empire did to Carvahall was raise their taxes, but it was otherwise a peaceful and prosperous village. Here, Carvahall looks like an utterly wretched place to live, with the Empire's guards [[BigBrotherIsWatchingYou keeping tabs on everyone]], bullying people and even trying to beat up Brom merely for speaking about the old Riders; they also conscript people into the army as soon as they come of age (which is why Roran leaves Carvahall in the film, to avoid being forced to fight).
to:
* AdaptationalVillainy: AdaptationalUgliness: The gedwey insignia, the mark of a Dragon Rider. The books version is a silvery oval; here, it’s a “e” composed of scar tissue.
* AdaptationalVillainy:
** The Empire. Though they're the villains in the books as well, they're much more blatantly evil in the film. For example, in the first book, the worst thing the Empire did to Carvahall was raise their taxes, but it was otherwise a peaceful and prosperous village. Here, Carvahall looks like an utterly wretched place to live, with the Empire's guards [[BigBrotherIsWatchingYou keeping tabs on everyone]], bullying people and even trying to beat up Brom merely for speaking about the old Riders; they also conscript people into the army as soon as they come of age (which is why Roran leaves Carvahall in the film, to avoid being forced to fight).
** Galbatorix himself. The film leaves out his FreudianExcuse of losing his dragon and being driven mad by the loss.
* AdaptationalVillainy:
** The Empire. Though they're the villains in the books as well, they're much more blatantly evil in the film. For example, in the first book, the worst thing the Empire did to Carvahall was raise their taxes, but it was otherwise a peaceful and prosperous village. Here, Carvahall looks like an utterly wretched place to live, with the Empire's guards [[BigBrotherIsWatchingYou keeping tabs on everyone]], bullying people and even trying to beat up Brom merely for speaking about the old Riders; they also conscript people into the army as soon as they come of age (which is why Roran leaves Carvahall in the film, to avoid being forced to fight).
** Galbatorix himself. The film leaves out his FreudianExcuse of losing his dragon and being driven mad by the loss.
Added DiffLines:
* BadBoss: Durza casually brutalizes and kills his Urgals for failures.