History DethroningMoment / WebOriginal

* K00L4: Her "WesternAnimation/HazbinHotel" video might not be any worse than her previous content, but it's a showcase that even when Lily is trying to be positive, she screws up. She starts by bringing up Old Testament god in a way that makes her seem like a reddit atheist insulting Christianity, but that's the least of the video's problems. She's under the impression that the entirety of heaven is corrupt, which...no. The fact Emily wants sinners to be redeemed and that multiple angels were horrified to learn of the exterminations easilt debunks her claim. Again, she looks like a narcicistic reddit atheist by saying this. When discussing Vaggie, she says Vaggie has nothing going on...even though she's literally a fallen angel and is hiding this major information from her girlfriend. The final straw was when she tried fighting for her previously debunked points in the Angel Dust section when it really didn't belong. These BlatantLies go on for pretty much the entire video. Lily, if you're reading this, I'm by no means trying to be rude, but either get better with your content, or log off.

* Saberwulf2018: ''The Critical Drinker'''s [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-LKaBY222KQ review]] of ''Film/RamboLastBlood'' failed in so many ways possible, with most of it relying heavily on Critical Research Failure (no pun intended). First off, while ''Last Blood'' was meant to be the GrandFinale of the ''Rambo'' saga as a whole, he's not the kind of character to get an epic poignant heroic sendoff. He even goes as far as to claim that he isn't Rambo at all, despite being played by Creator/SylvesterStallone, due to him being more talkative, clean-cut, and easy-going, even going as far as to call him an imposter. He had just came home for once, and stayed there peacefully for years. In the [[Film/FirstBlood first film]], he got back from Vietnam and hadn't settled back yet. In [[Film/RamboFirstBloodPartII the second]], he just got out of prison. [[Film/RamboIII The third]], he was living peacefully in Thailand and was raising money to help monks build a monastery. In [[Film/RamboIV the fourth]], Rambo was depressed and nihilistic and wanted to stay isolated from society. Now come the fifth film, Rambo had found a home, stayed settled for years, and also raised a family. He was also on pills to cope with his PTSD. And Rambo built a tunnel under his home because he was a Vietnam vet, and it was heavily inspired by the Vietcong utilizing the underground tunnel network during the war. Then he goes as far as to criticize not saying which college Gabriela was going to. I thought starting off on general education was what was needed before deciding what field you were to major in. Gabriela's father was just meant to be irredeemable and selfish, and besides, most baddies in ''Rambo'' were always one-dimensional. And the reason why Rambo didn't do any recon in an urban environment is probably because of him being on his pills for his illness. Also, the HumanTraffickers [[BondVillainStupidity keeping Rambo alive]] [[NoHoldsBarredBeatdown after beating him to near death]] was out of pure arrogance, as well as Rambo being so easy to gang up on and not seemingly pose a threat. They also wanted to make an example out of him and Gabriela so that they could scare away anyone who confronted them. When Rambo went back to rescue Gabriela from the traffickers, [[DropTheHammer he used a hammer on them]], not an axe. And when Rambo stopped taking the pills, that was when he decided to go back to killing. Again, the pills kept his PTSD at bay. The reason why he built his tunnel to be wired with explosives was because he wanted to make Hugo and his men feel desperation, fear, and helplessness, like what Gabriela did. And the villains did figure out that Rambo was responsible for one of their brothels getting hit, but Hugo had told Victor to let it go and ignore him, to just go back to business. And the worst thing is him criticizing TheStinger, where Rambo rides into the sunset rather than have him die from his wounds. Rambo is not the kind of character to be killed off so easily, it's almost as if he wanted Rambo to die in the end. While he may not have hated the film out of political differences like what most critics have been, I still feel like he was just being spiteful towards it.

** {{Tropers/enbyaxolotl}}: I find the video to be particularly pretentious and very self-serving in regards to how Emperor Lemon supposedly views normies. I'm honestly shocked anybody can take it seriously, the video to me reads like some bizarre manifesto, when it's supposed to be a take down of a [=YouTuber=]. It's pretty much just a justification for him viewing himself as superior to Behind the Meme, when really they're both just humans.

* {{Tropers/Pgj1997}}: While I think Creator/EmperorLemon's [[https://youtu.be/qFGqhEVr7lk Meme Theory on Behind the Meme]] was well-constructed, one thing that gets to me is how he views "normies". Basically, [[ItsPopularNowItSucks if you like anything from mainstream media, you're a normie, and shouldn't be taken seriously]]. This vague definition is what bothers me. Not only is this downright childish to base a person off of what they like and don't like, but it just comes off as condescending. Might I remind everyone, this guy is well known for making {{YouTube Poop}}s of Creator/{{Pixar}} movies, and even created an [[WebVideo/TheFryingNemoSaga entire tetralogy]] based on ''WesternAnimation/FindingNemo'', which is also mainstream media. I've seen many people on the internet who act like this, but this ranks near the top. Flat out saying "You like X, and it's mainstream, therefore, you're a normie, and I hate you" just makes him come off as a giant asshole who thinks you can label people based on their interests. News flash, you can't.

** Tropers/DrZulu2010: For me, it has to be one of his entries in the "Top 10 EA Fails". Now, I hate EA as much as the next guy but saying that the 3DO was EA's attempt to go into the console market, when there is nothing that binds them both other than Trip Hawkins was the creator and was still president of the board at EA while still being the boss of the 3DO Company. And even there, EA released games on other platforms other than the 3DO while the console was released. If they owned the console, then EA would have console exclusivity with the 3DO and only the 3DO. Heck, with that logic, you might as well put the ''UsefulNotes/XboxOne'' as an EA failure since Don Mattrick, who used to work for EA, was the one responsible for how it became a console so mocked even Sony has to give them the most epic of burns, the ones which only Sega has feld during E3 1995. After all, because someone who worked at EA is responsible for a console EA has nothing to do with other than it has games published by them means it's somehow EA's fault am I right, Josh?

* Tropers/SickBritKid: While I normally like WebVideo/{{Benzaie}} and his charming, snarky French attitude, his video "TOP 5: Why ''Zelda Twilight Princess'' SUCKS" was just downright stupid (it was nothing but petty nitpicks that were used against the game a full five years ago when it came out), ignorant ([[{{Hypocrite}} really, Benzaie? You're gonna rail against ''Twilight Princess'' for having items that aren't used outside of the dungeons you acquire them in... Even though that showed up in ''Ocarina of Time'', which you shill on endlessly? Or you're gonna bitch about the final item being another Clawshot and how much that sucks... despite the longshot from Ocarina of Time basically just being a longer hookshot]]? Oh, and you're also gonna rail on the game's graphics, completely ignoring the fact that it was made for the UsefulNotes/NintendoGameCube and then ported to the UsefulNotes/{{Wii}}?), and just came off like he was trying to bait fans of ''Twilight Princess'' into flaming him and get a whole bunch of views by either the TP fans who came to debate and/or flame him and the TP haters who came to defend his points of view. All in all, it was one of the worst game reviews since X-Play's ''Your Childhood Sucked: Final Fantasy 7''.

* {{Krystalis}} ''WebVideo/{{Alpharad}}'': I was a long time viewer, since 2016 or so, and enjoyed a lot of his content. However, in "Being Toxic in Among Us," a video uploaded in March 2023, he started saying how telling people to unalive themselves (KYS) as an insult should come back, and is okay. It's clearly not okay, and told to the wrong person, could cause someone to take their life. This has soured me on all his future videos, and I can't watch his stuff now.

* {{Krystalis}} ''WebVideo/Alpharad'': I was a long time viewer, since 2016 or so, and enjoyed a lot of his content. However, in "Being Toxic in Among Us," a video uploaded in March 2023, he started saying how telling people to unalive themselves (KYS) as an insult should come back, and is okay. It's clearly not okay, and told to the wrong person, could cause someone to take their life. This has soured me on all his future videos, and I can't watch his stuff now.

* Tropers/{{Lalapolpolpol}}: I had long become dilusioned over BWW turning into more and more of a circlejerk with a higher dedication towards insulting webcomics over the writers bias instead of a wiki reviewing, well, bad webcomics. I think the apex of this shitness was in 2022's review of ''Stonetoss''. Yes, the infamous alt-right cartoonist. They have mocked other far-right nuts before, so surely they would spend the review pointing out Stonetoss lack of research, offensive insults disguided as BlackComedy and bigoted views. Nope! The review is a gigantic apologistic propaganda, with the writer completely downplaying Stonetoss self-admitted nazi positions with the laughable defense of "He just wants to make people think about society guys!" while arguing that he "mocks every political side" including republicans. Yes, of course, the man who "wants to make society think" by copy-pasting stereotypical imagery alongside crude, bargain-bin "jokes - while ignoring the fact that many people further on the right criticize republicans for ''being too moderate'' which is why Stonetoss ocasionally mocks them too. At multiple times the article feels less like a review of the comic's contents themselves and more like an attempt at doing a ImplausibleDeniability of Stonetoss political positions, which of course are defended through the use of JustJokingJustification. The cherry on top is the article finishing with a [[InsaneTrollLogic "genius"]] comment - saying that if those who opposed Stonetoss stopped giving him material, he wouldn't mock them, which the writer claims it's impossible given "the SJW's who hate him". 'Cause of course the [[SarcasmMode only reason why somebody would dislike Stonetoss is if they are "SJW" right?]]

* [=SenorCornholio=]: I have a similar complaint from his [[https://youtu.be/-zJD9B0za9k Pokémon Bootlegs]] video. Everything described above applies here: the video is absolutely fantastic, the jokes are on point and gut-bustingly hilarious, but there's one game he could have gone into more detail on, and that's VideoGame/PokemonVietnameseCrystal. He doesn't even go past the opening segment with Professor Oak before switching games. Given that this is a TranslationTrainWreck of [[MemeticMutation memetic degree]], I get that there's probably not much he could say about it that hasn't been said, but that doesn't mean one shouldn't try. [[TheyWastedAPerfectlyGoodPlot He could have at least gotten to]] "[[SugarWiki/FunnyMoments BAG FUCK]]" [[TheyWastedAPerfectlyGoodPlot or something and ''then'' quit the game in disgust.]] Once again, I feel like this is one of [=JonTron=]'s best videos that he's put out, but there was just that one thing he should have gone into more detail about, but didn't.

* BunnyStar: In Creator/LilyOrchard's [[https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=etvVR8kjmaM Let's Rank Every Cartoon Lily Liked As A Kid From Worst To Best]], specifically when she talks about WesternAnimation/AvatarTheLastAirbender in regards to Zuko's HeelFaceTurn, she claims that abuse victims don't need to change, disregarding that abuse victims are still responsible for whatever bad actions they commit, and the pain that they cause to other people. While it does suck that people like Zuko have been abused, [[FreudianExcuseIsNoExcuse it still shouldn't be an excuse to hurt others and take all of their negative emotions out on them]].
* mkmlp: I used to enjoy Lily's content, and even when I did not agree with her view on a given work I could at least respect her. But as her jabs at people and works she didn't like became more mean spirited and her attitude became more bitter, I found harder harder to like her content. This came to a head for me in her "In A Minute" video on {{Disney}}'s ''WesternAnimation/{{Hercules}}'', where completely out of the blue, Lily's asked be a friend sitting with her on this particular video, something along the line of "Which proto fascist would win in a fight, [[Franchise/DragonBall Goku]] or Hercules". To which Lily replies "Hercules, Goku's a little bitch." This exchange served no purpose, but to piss off ''Dragon Ball'' fans for no real reason. It didn't even have anything to do with the rest of the video.

* Regulas314: I have put up with an awful Lot of Lily Orchard's shit over the years. It was a toss-up between her Glass of Water "Drama Queen" where she essentially called anyone who watched anime she doesn't like a pedophile or her first impressions of WesternAnimation/MoonGirlAndDevilDinosaur where she just completely dismissed it after two episodes, making total assumptions and no issues about the possibility of it becoming serialized for no other reason than her disdain for serialized content (ignoring how most Marvel shows are usually serialized for example). While the latter ultimately had me drop her completely, the former is the video that made me realize Lily is not worth watching on any front.

* [=EnigmaLobo=]: While LetsPlay/{{MangaMinx}} is one of the more beloved female Lets Players, her VideoGame/UntilDawn playthrough is rather uncomfortable to watch due to her vitriol against Ashley, having to tried to [[spoiler: get her killed twice in a row during the Ashley vs. Josh and Ashley vs. Chris]] choice, and thus her fury towards Ashley for [[spoiler: refusing to open the door to allow Chris in because of remembering that Chris attempt to sacrifice Ashley earlier to save himself, thus allowing the Wendigo to kill Chris]], and calls her a psychopath. This is after spending her playthrough being unsympathetic to Ashley's plight, and [[spoiler: trying to get her killed twice with no remorse, telling her to "shut the fuck up" when she begs for her life as she tries to shoot her]]. That wouldn't be a problem on its own, but her response to those who call her out on her hypocrisy? She's not only amused by their comments, but she also states that there is something wrong with you for not agreeing with her comments about calling Ashley a psychopath. It's one thing to ignore your own hypocrisy for the sake of humour, it's another thing to insult your fanbase for simply pointing it out in the first place and assuming that their idiots for not agreeing with you.
* Veranas: I've enjoyed watching [=MangaMinx=] ever since she started doing Amnesia videos back in the day. But her Undertale playthrough, and more specifically her vitriolic reactions to fans, was the last straw for me. It's one thing to have a different opinion on a popular game, but playing it in a certain way solely to piss off fans is highly immature, as is trying to fan the flames in the comments section. She tweeted having lost around 5500 subscribers since her playthrough, and I'm sad to count myself among them.

* Drbazooka: Normally I like ''Planet Dolan''. I find his top lists to be among the better lists on Website/YouTube. Except in one instance during his ''Top Ten worst video game cliches'' list. Now the list itself was mostly fine although it did contain many cliches not exclusive to gaming, but my [=DMoS=] comes not from the video itself, but the thumbnail. The thumbnail contained an image of Chica the Chicken from ''VideoGame/FiveNightsAtFreddys'' with white bold text saying "Jumpscares!" Not only was Fnaf not mentioned at all in the video, but jumpscares weren't either. Worse still this caused a flame war in the comments section and made the video feel like click bait to me. I felt conned after watching and it has somewhat soured my opinion of him, at least big [=LPers=] who are often accused of click bait actually show what's in the title of the video!
* [[Tropers/RolentosRightHandMan RolentosRightHandMan]]: For me, it's #15 on his ''15 Most Embarrassing Moments in Gaming Ever'' list, where he compares the petition to change [[VideoGame/MassEffect3 Mass Effect 3]]'s ending to "an embarrassing tantrum". I don't really care much about [=ME3's=] ending controversy, but to say those who want better story are whiners is just uncalled for. I'm willing to move on and keep watching, but I didn't watch [=PD=] so Dolan could shove his opinion down my throat and insult others.

* Tropers/{{supernintendo128}}: [=ProtoMario=] is a Website/YouTube commentator who talks about current events in gaming and for a while I was a fan of him until I saw [[https://youtu.be/9JmR31KChI0 this]] rant of the Nintendo 2015 Digital Event where he reached [[WebVideo/TheMysteriousMrEnter Mysterious Mr. Enter]] levels of rage, only even more irrational. The video is full of Critical Research Failure (like not understanding why there are Muppet skits in between the announcements when the biggest announcement in the event is ''Star Fox Zero'', a new game in a series inspired by Series/{{Thunderbirds}} a british puppet TV show) and expecting too much out of the company (complaining about the fact that no new ''Donkey Kong Country'' or ''Kirby'' games were announced when ''Donkey Kong Country: Tropical Freeze'' came out a year ago and ''Kirby and the Rainbow Curse'' came out a mere 5 months ago) but the stupidest part of the entire video is when he acts like ''Star Fox Zero'' was the only game announced for the Wii U, nevermind that like 6 other games are coming out for it soon, and claims that Wii U owners have nothing to play this year due to the apparent lack of new games announced, while treating replaying older games for the system as a bad thing and uses the tired "Wii U has no games" argument, when at this point, there are plenty of games for the system. The reason behind these stupid accusions is that he admits that he did not watch the entire Digial Event before making this video, only seeing bits and pieces of it. One of the biggest mistakes a commentator can make is see bits and pieces of the thing they are commentating on and assume that they know what they are talking about. After this video, I unsubscribed to him and never looked back.

* SomeNewGuy: While the WebVideo/TwoBestFriendsPlay ''VideoGame/TheWalkingDead'' LP was overall pretty good (giving us such gems like the Shame Car), I have to take issue with their treatment of Kenny, specifically how their hate for him ends up being due to [[spoiler:Larry's death]]. Look, I'll be the first to admit that there are many reasons not to like Kenny, but [[spoiler:Larry was the epitome of AssholeVictim and was clearly already dead anyway]], so seeing this as the main reason for them hating Kenny just came off as silly to me.

* [=TomPhanto=]: For me, it's a small part of his Worst People of 2014 video where he talks about some really horrible people and why he feels they belong on the list. He then gets to Justin Bieber and instead of talking about him, it's just an eight second clip where he sings "Baby" as a joke and looks at the camera in surprise. He doesn't even explain why he thinks he should be on the list. My issue is that I don't consider [=UTF=] to be someone who makes overused jokes, but it just disappoints anyone hoping to see why he felt Bieber was a bad influence for the year. I never liked Justin Bieber, but to me, it just felt like an excuse to poke fun at him for a cheap laugh, which at this point is [[SeinfeldIsUnfunny so overdone it's unfunny.]] I just consider it a time waster and I know [=UTF=] is better than that.

* Tropers/CoCage: I would like to present ''Review Tech USA’s'' response to ''If You're Over 30 And You Still Love Nintendo, You're Weird''. Basically, the "controversy" is about a Website/YouTube user named Yoshiller at E3, whom was interviewed by a news crew. The big deal was that he wore a Yoshi hat while interviewed, and other gamers grew a big fuss that he was invoking a bad stereotype. The problem is Rich goes on this rant about projecting stereotypes and being exclusive is wrong, [[{{Hypocrite}} while going on to call Yoshiller man-child and singled him out based on exaggerated rumors and speculations]]. Okay Rich, screw you on this, because you don’t know dick about the guy. I saw the guy’s E3 videos, and he looked and acted fine; perfectly composed. He was just doing his thing and showing support for a company he likes. He never acted like a jerk or an immature brat. [[DoubleStandard So let me get this straight: gamers can’t wear or show any support to a video game/video game company they love publicly, but it’s okay for people who like TV shows or movies to do the same.]] [[SarcasmMode Congratulations dumb-ass]], [[HeWhoFightsMonsters you now just became the thing you hated]] and jumped on the bandwagon like most news sites. Also, Yoshiller responded in the comments section of the video, and makes a comment not meaning to offend anyone and says that he [[Yoshiller]] still supports his own actions, and rightfully calls out on Rich and others for being ousted. What’s worse is that Rich never responds back nor apologizes about his big research failure (which he usually does when wrong or mistaken). I never agreed with everything Rich said, but I at least respected him, and gave his views food for thought. After an incident like this, I can say he lost a subscriber.
* Tropers/MathsAngelicVersion: You might know that I don't think too highly of ''WesternAnimation/{{Tangled}}'', so it might not surprise you that I'm not thrilled about [[http://whatculture.com/ What Culture]]'s article "[[http://whatculture.com/film/10-reasons-frozen-definitely-disneys-best-animated-movie-decade.php/ 10 Reasons Frozen Is Definitely NOT Disney’s Best Animated Movie This Decade]]", which should've had the more honest title "10 Reasons I Think ''Tangled'' Kicks ''WesternAnimation/{{Frozen|2013}}''[='=]s Ass".\\
Actually, most of the reasons aren't bad and the author has some good points even though I disagree with them. However, reason #2, "[[http://whatculture.com/film/10-reasons-frozen-definitely-disneys-best-animated-movie-decade.php/10 Elsa Is Kind Of A B*TCH]]" just stinks. It uses BlatantLies and [[MetaphoricallyTrue deliberately misleading half-truths]] to make Elsa look bad. Well, either that or we have a case of Critical Research Failure. The author claims that Elsa "was so wrapped up in her own problem she didn’t even notice she was damning an entire kingdom", even though it's obvious from watching the movie that Elsa at that point has no reason to believe her powers can have such devastating effects. He claims that Elsa doesn't even bother to try to thaw the kingdom, but fails to take into account that she has no idea how to do it and that returning to Arendelle would probably just make everything worse. He claims that Elsa shuts Anna out because she doesn't give a damn about her, when the film clearly shows that Elsa cares for Anna and is forced to shut her out to keep her from getting hurt. He also makes it sound like Elsa intentionally [[spoiler:freezes Anna's heart]], even though Elsa doesn't (it happened while she was not thinking straight) and is clearly horrified when she sees what has happened.\\

* Tropers/{{IHateMyselfAndWantToDie}}: A somewhat minor one, but WebVideo/RockedReviews' video "Regretting the Past: Chocolate Starfish and the Hot Dog Flavored Water" really rubbed me the wrong way. So, a bit of context: the guy who runs the channel (Luke Spencer) is an old-school metalhead who loves and worships the likes of {{Music/Metallica}}, but hates bands like Music/LimpBizkit, {{Music/Creed}}, {{Music/Nickelback}} and really just any band with a large hate-base. He has this horrible tendency to bring up these bands just to insult them. And believe me, this isn't a problem relating to differing opinions. Not at all. It's how often he does it. It's like, we get it, you don't like these bands. But, anyway, back to today's focus. His review of Limp Bizkit's "Chocolate Starfish". I do think that he made several valid criticisms, and I applaud him for giving credit where it's due. However, it's when he brings up the lyrical reference to Music/NineInchNails in "Hot Dog", saying something along the lines of "If you're going to reference another band, at least make it a good one". This came out of nowhere, and is even more jarring when you consider he didn't even mention the references to Music/GunsNRoses and Music/TheWho in "My Generation". It's a video about Limp Bizkit. If you're going to mention it, just do so and move on. If anything, get mad at Fred Durst for stealing lyrics. Add in other little problems like the "[[SarcasmMode always-hilarious]]" gags of "It was so bad, it knocked me out", "a minute of laughing from other people", hypocritically complaining about all the angst on the album and, as always, bringing up other bands that have nothing to do with the video (just to put them down), and you can see my issue.

* ''DethroningMoment/GameTheory''

* Asue: hotdiggedydemon's [[https://youtu.be/xCTcUUYCoBk review of The Powerpuff Girls 2016 reboot]] was a massive disappointment. Now, I do admit to like hdd's stuff (through I don't really like his gross jokes). But this was... Ugh. First of all, this review came waaaaaaay after the initial reaction towards the show (in December of 2016, while the show premiered on April 4, eight months earlier), a.k.a it's old news. I wouldn't usually have a problem with someone reviewing something that was reviewed to death, as long as they bring something new to the table. But he didn't. None of his points were any original or felt fresh whatsoever (from ranting about the reboot toning down the violence, which isn't the cartoon's fault but rather because of the MoralGuardians who complained about the original show's violence, to talking about the main characters not getting their old voice actresses back to the twerking bit). Second, his smug tone during the video made him look like he was trying way too hard to be like "I know better than you, Powerpuff Girls 2016 team" (especially when he actually challenges them to watch this video, which reeks of [[SmallNameBigEgo pretentiousness]]) and made me cringe. And third, he was reading too much into the supposed "anti-feminism" stuff (which was made up just to make the show look like a sexist piece of crap while not even trying to be funny in the process). And this is coming from someone who thought the reboot was "meh". (Also, what was up with that random TakeThat towards ''Franchise/StarWars'' at the end? That was pointless and not even remotely connected to the review at all.)

* [=FromtheWordsofBR=]: The [[BileFascination only reason]] why I've read the ''Watchdog'' blog from the [[MoralGuardians Parents Television Council]] is [[SoBadItsGood to see what hilarious overreaction of the day they have]]. I hate them, but they've never particularly ticked me off... until they "[[http://w2.parentstv.org/blog/index.php/2015/05/06/worst-tv-show-of-the-week-izombie-on-the-cw/ reviewed]]" ''Series/IZombie''. I could already point out several things wrong with this (such as them claiming that it tries to "lure in" audiences with "faux-''Series/VeronicaMars''[=/=]''Series/BuffyTheVampireSlayer''-style dialogue"... when the people behind ''[=iZombie=]'' are the same ones behind ''Veronica Mars''), but the thing that really ticked me off the most was a passage that says "Genre fans claim to watch programs like ''Series/TheWalkingDead'' and ''[=iZombie=]'' for the dramatic plots, the quality of the characterization and dialogue, even the humor. Assuming they’re telling the truth and aren’t just turned on by gore..." That's right, they're essentially [[FanHater calling anybody who dare enjoys]] ''The Walking Dead'' and ''[=iZombie=]'' people with fetishes for gore. And yet, generalizing people who like those shows is less sickening than Liv eating ramen-brains? Saying things like that only makes you look far more immature than the shows you protest. Also, I know that they've "counteracted" this "claim" several times before, but this demonstrates that they don't know how to use a remote control--just turn the show off if you don't like it, instead of trying to shut it down for people who actually enjoy it for legitimate reasons. If you don't want your kid to watch it, don't let them watch it--it's the parent's job and responsibility to monitor what their kids watch, not what the media or the television says.

** Troper/Sakubara: For me that would be her Top 10 Favorite Anime (or to be more accurate the final nail in the coffin due to my general dislike of her OpinionMyopia). Now the entries themselves are fine (in fact I like some of them as well) ,but when she was talking about ''Manga/CardcaptorSakura'' she unfavourably contrasted it with ''Anime/PuellaMagiMadokaMagica'' and flat out said she didn't like the show. Now don't get me wrong I'm completely I completely understand that ''Madoka Magica'' is not for everyone including fans of more traditional MagicalGirl shows...THE PROBLEM is that thumbnail is from the show image which to any normal viewer would imply that it would be on the list! ''Madoka'' fans like me would click on it expecting her to talk about the show in a positive way only to be surprised that learn that she actually hates the show. That would be like Josh Scrocher putting ''VideoGame/{{Okami}}'' in the thumbnail for his Top 10 Games list even though it's notoriously the game he hates ,but everyone else loves.

* Troper/BronyOftheOctaves: Personally, I used to enjoy MLP-Movie reviewer Hunter Reviews (or as his channel is called [=HeadHunter=] Productions now) because he played off this review show as a part of the MLP Universe, criticizing bad movies. However, he eventually began to do a series that didn't catch my attention, but it did garner form mix opinion called "It Sucked But I Still Played It", which is ExactlyWhatItSaysOnTheTin. All was fine... until he pulled a complete 180 and did a video entitled: "VideoGame/FiveNightsAtFreddys1: It Sucked But I Still Played It". At first, I figured it'd be a video of him just criticizing the difficulty and just not finding it fun, similar to HypeBacklash. What was it instead? A complete BiasSteamroller criticizing the game for being popular, with Hunter giving basically a huge "FUCK YOU!" to the fanbase, WebVideo/{{Markiplier}}, LetsPlay/JackSepticEye, and even Scott Cawthon! It completely felt like a big middle finger to not just fans of the game, but to Mark's Fans, Jack's fans, and even those who respect Scott. It didn't help the comment section was filled with a slew of people attacking each other on whether or not Hunter was in the right. It's even considered Hunter's most polarizing video, and quite honestly made some fans feel he developed a huge SmallNameBigEgo type of thing.

* ''DethroningMoment/AnimatedJames''

[[folder:Flashgitz]]
* SenorCornholio: I have recently warmed up to Racist Mario due to the voice clips being used in some of [[WebAnimation/Supermarioglitchy4sSuperMario64Bloopers SMG4's videos]] (such as [[https://youtu.be/Wjb0FgQqpZA this one]]), but that doesn't change the fact that overall, this video is heavily flawed in more ways than one. I could go on about the unfunny jokes, the nonsensical plot, etc, but what I think makes the whole thing fall apart: the premise. Mario goes insane and starts killing everyone because of all the third-party characters in the current race. Why does this not work? Well firstly, because there has never been a third-party character in a main ''Mario Kart'' title. The DLC characters for ''VideoGame/MarioKart8'' were all from other Nintendo franchises, and therefore first-party. Secondly, the characters themselves; [[VideoGame/SegaSuperstars Sonic may have been playable in several Sega-themed sports and racing titles]], but the only time he crossed over with Nintendo itself was in ''VideoGame/SuperSmashBros'', which would have actually been a better setting due to [[VideoGame/SonicTheHedgehog their]] [[VideoGame/MetalGear own]] [[Franchise/MegaMan selection]] [[VideoGame/PacMan of]] [[Franchise/StreetFighter third]]-[[VideoGame/FinalFantasyVII party]] [[{{VideoGame/Bayonetta}} characters]]. And even then, Knuckles wasn't even playable so that's out. It's like some of these franchises were listed all because of their racing titles, with [[Franchise/StarWars Anakin]] and [[VideoGame/CrashBandicoot Crash's head]] also being standout examples. Thirdly, speaking of Sony, was there an alternate universe I'm not aware of where Sony and Nintendo crossed over and [[VideoGame/LittleBigPlanet Sackboy]] and [[VideoGame/GodOfWar Kratos]] were put into karts? I'll admit that Kratos driving a tiny kart is a funny sight, but what's the point? Ironically, there's one crossover that I doubt Flashgitz even knows he got right, and that's Pac-Man's head on a spear, since he was playable in the Arcade GP games developed by Namco-Bandai. Other than that, the rest of the references are shallow at best and make absolutely no sense at worst. Now if you'll excuse me, I'm gonna go watch [[https://youtu.be/ynKRJt4CDMY the version where all the violence is replaced with The Nutshack]]. It's somehow way better.
* Tropers/CaptainTedium: The "[[WesternAnimation/TheTransformers TRANSformers]]" video had a lot of things about it that ticked me off, since it's basically about the Decepticons becoming social justice warriors to manipulate the Autobots into turning against and killing Optimus Prime, but the offending turd topping this excrement sundae was a very unfunny "cops are racist" joke where Prowl killed a black man on sight for no reason whatsoever.
[[/folder]]

[[folder:[=SMG4's=] Super Mario 64 Bloopers]]
* Tropers/MeerkatMario: If there was one ''WebAnimation/Supermarioglitchy4sSuperMario64Bloopers'' episode which had to be an entire [=DMoS=] for me, it has to be "[[https://youtu.be/Lgs7C62ZkhQ The Idea Block]]". Mostly not because of the plot or story elements or whatsoever, but because of how bad the editing was. Brief graphical tint changes in the background and the characters, Sony Vegas text presets being overused, stretched VideoGame/GarrysMod clips, that was how bad I considered the editing to be. And not just that, but [[spoiler: the angry mob]], too. Seriously, I consider this the worst [=SMG4=] video I ever saw. At least "Castle Royale", which was the following video, was better. Because if it wasn't, then I would've unsubscribed [=SMG4=].
* CauchyRerunWhen: The tail end of [=SMG4=]'s Anime Arc, namely, Desti's death in ''World War Mario'' and the resulting consequences in ''Final Hours'' had to be this for me. Sure, the series has lost its grip from time to time, such as adding more anime appeal characters, sponsoring recent games, going down DarkerAndEdgier paths, such as the Waluigi Arc, but overall stayed what it was in quality; a stupid, weird, goofy, and funny show that used memes effectively instead of shoehorning them in, and one that had writing of surprisingly high quality. That changed at an unbelievably rapid pace after these episodes. The whole gist of this part was that Desti became a main character for a time, but then died, yes, died, in a series that utilizes DeathIsCheap frequently, at the end of the arc. Little to no character development was given to Desti, making her death nothing but a warning that things were going to change for the worse. Take Saiko-chan, a similar character, and how she developed: {{Yandere}} (first appearance) and/or DeadpanSnarker (post Luigi's Lesson) -> JerkWithAHeartOfGold (Mario and the Diss Track and onwards.) Desti? Dick -> slightly less of a dick -> [[WeHardlyKnewYe Dead.]] Compounding the problem were three more things. First was that Desti was given only two episodes for people to get to know her other than the unholy fusion of TheRival and AlphaBitch, which isn't a lot of time. The Lerds also seemed to make little effort on their part. And lastly, Desti effectively still amounted to a minor character in her short stint, getting a paltry five episodes total. What ticks me off a little bit about this is that the bros. didn't have the guts to kill off a major character instead, such as Meggy or Saiko-Chan, which, while taking out a major component of the cast, would create a much larger impact. That's the thing about characters: they're kind of like selling Mons in games such as PAD or Crash Fever. The gacha-only ones net you more coins and MP (or their respective equivalent) much like utilizing KilledOffForReal on a main character will create a greater, lasting effect, whereas selling quest monsters will only net you a tiny bit of MP and coins, much like killing a minor character will likely cause audiences to be apathetic about it, so one has to choose wisely, whether they want to use it in battle, or use it for their own gain. Overall, the episode was one that left a bad taste in my mouth and one that left me feeling betrayed and disappointed in Luke and Kevin. They've done much more wonderful things in the past, such as the Waluigi arc. And the aftermath of the DMOS? Not good. The humor began to become more juvenile, to pander towards the rapidly growing kid fanbase, and lean towards the "umpteen minutes of ForcedMeme spam" detractors say the show is, plots of standard episodes became more shallow, it was never explained how Meggy became the thing she is now, and the certain adult quality that added to the humor began to drip away slowly but surely, as there were less references to sex, drugs, censoring all or most swear words, etc, ultimately dooming the show to that of a great many others; to become a soulless, rotting husk of itself that would only get worse as time goes on. If this is what we can expect, it breaks my heart to say I don't expect much of Meta Runner.
* [=JMRS=]: The Genesis Arc is an amazing arc and I love it to death, but this arc has just one episode that completely rubs me the wrong way, and that episode is ''Doomsday but Mario is Okay''. The reasons why I don't like this episode include the fact that [=SMG4=] didn't even bother to bring any food for everyone, except for what seemed to be only one simple can of vegetable ramen. I get that he may have been in a rush to get a bunker built for everyone to hide in while Chris and Swag try to destroy [=SMG0's=] USB, but he should have at least thought to bring some food in case nobody thought to bring their own, which brings me to my next problem: Boopkins has some chocolate with him and Mario tries to take it from him. Then, when Meggy tells Mario off for stealing his chocolate, she starts trying to eat it instead of giving it back to Boopkins, ultimately culminating in Saiko keeping the chocolate with her instead of giving it back to its rightful owner. Speaking of Meggy and Mario, I found their feud really annoying in this episode. Mario has been shown to be one of Meggy's best friends in the series, even going so far as to help her win Splatfest! Here, however, all of that character development and heartwarming friendship gets tossed out of the window for the sake of this poorly thought-out fight between them that was caused over something as simple as a piece of confectionery. However, the worst thing about this episode has to be the ending. It turns out that everyone forgot to tell Luigi about the fact that they were going to nuke Peach's castle, thus leaving him to walk towards the castle with some board games and get blown up, which also doesn't make sense considering that he was with the group at the end of the previous episode, "The Day HE Arrived" to see [=SMG0's=] USB floating above Peach's castle so you'd think that he would have heard [=SMG4's=] plan to have a nuke blow up the USB, a plan that ultimately didn't work, by the way. About the only significance this episode has to me is Mario, [=SMG4=] and Axol being captured by [=SMG0=]. Everything else about it is pointless at best and irritating at worst, especially the ending that made me, someone who has a soft spot for Luigi, cringe really badly.
* Tropers/CabbitGirlEmi: After seeing "If Mario Was the Last Man on Earth", I eventually realized that it blew the bad moments like Mario [[BlackComedy making an omelet out of a Yoshi egg]] in "The Mario Cafe" out of the water. The premise starts off interesting as Mario's friends have gone missing, but then we find out why- it's because [[spoiler:Mario accidentally ruined his friends' attempt at making a world record pizza]]. [[FlatWhat Really?]] Mario has done much worse in the past decade like that aforementioned Yoshi omelet incident, as well as being an UnwittingPawn for a few of the arcs' BigBad[=s=], but [[spoiler:accidentally ruining a world record pizza]] is where the line is drawn?
[[/folder]]

[[folder:[=GradeAUnderA=]]]
* Tropers/Izzy1: To be honest, ''WebAnimation/GradeAUnderA'''s video "THE YOUTUBERS COMPLAINING ABOUT DRAMA RANT (Exposing Matthew Santoro)" rubbed me the wrong way, specifically the part where he insulted WebVideo/{{Markiplier}}. Now, before you make assumptions, I don't follow Markiplier or watch his stuff, but the fact that Grade was insulting him based on his appearance (having dyed red hair) and for calling himself "Markimoo" (which I heard is something his fans call him) rather than what he actually had to say was disappointing. And when he addressed this in his followup video saying that nobody is immune to criticism, I had 2 problems with that: 1. He was completely missing the point of why people were mad at him, for the most part, thinking that people were mad because Markiplier dyed his hair, initially pink for charity and later red out of respect for a dead friend, and saying he shouldn't be immune to criticism as a result, especially since Mark apparently caused more drama with his video. While I'm not sure if that's true, I think I can say that a lot of people, myself included, were more miffed about the way you attacked him for petty reasons, rather than that. 2. He makes a huge point about saying that everyone should be open to criticism, yet on [[https://np.reddit.com/r/GradeAUnderA/comments/4ht7fr/transparency_is_key_more_info_in_comments/ Reddit, he tried to delete a thread criticizing him for getting "annoyed" by it]]. Honestly, I was starting to like this guy's content, but these events turned me off from his videos.
* Troper/{{shonengirl}}: Hoo boy, his ''Franchise/{{Pokemon}}'' video... It's hard to point out one moment in particular, but it's basically a series of "jokes" (I think) that have already been beaten up to death, revived, HM01'd into tiny pieces, beat up again, horn drilled, and incinerated. And I seriously couldn't tell if it was all supposed to be a bunch of jokes or not due to many of the "jokes" (mainly "hurdy durr Pokeymanz is animal abuse!") being things said with complete seriousness before, and it comes off a lot like some cringy "scrub" ranting about something he knows nothing about, or at least has never played since gen I. The blatant Critical Research Failure all over the place was just painful to sit through, so much so I had to skip through tiny segments of it. This was especially jarring since he pulled up the gen I manual, something only hardcore fans usually do, and actually knew that Red is 11... But yet calls Red "Ash", something that no Pokemon fan over 12 would ever do, and he should be relieved that he wasn't swarmed by rabid Red fans by some miracle. If those were jokes, they weren't funny. It doesn't help that the description made me put my hopes up. The only things that were good or new were the bit about him actually getting Red and Blue's ages right, and the mocking of the deviation of game text from what's said in the manual. Everything else is just so cliche and overdone, and I expect more from him. Not to mention it feels like he's trying to jump on the hype train of second wave Pokemania because he can, and free cash.
[[/folder]]

* Tropers/Metalhead14: I love WebOriginal/ScareTheater to death, but his "Desmond Is Amazing" video could have been handled a lot better, and hundreds of his other fans think so too. I get that he had good intentions, but the way he words everything is just awful and makes him seem incredibly dismissive of everything. He seemed way too easy on everyone involved; I'm not sure if he rushed this one out or was afraid of being politically incorrect, but he's usually better than this and this video didn't make him look very good. Desmond's situation is a very serious matter, and Scare didn't handle it properly. Thankfully, he's gotten back on his feet since, but that video really does deserve all the outrage it's gotten.

* Tropers/Izzy1: To be honest, ''WebVideo/GradeAUnderA'''s video "THE YOUTUBERS COMPLAINING ABOUT DRAMA RANT (Exposing Matthew Santoro)" rubbed me the wrong way, specifically the part where he insulted WebVideo/{{Markiplier}}. Now, before you make assumptions, I don't follow Markiplier or watch his stuff, but the fact that Grade was insulting him based on his appearance (having dyed red hair) and for calling himself "Markimoo" (which I heard is something his fans call him) rather than what he actually had to say was disappointing. And when he addressed this in his followup video saying that nobody is immune to criticism, I had 2 problems with that: 1. He was completely missing the point of why people were mad at him, for the most part, thinking that people were mad because Markiplier dyed his hair, initially pink for charity and later red out of respect for a dead friend, and saying he shouldn't be immune to criticism as a result, especially since Mark apparently caused more drama with his video. While I'm not sure if that's true, I think I can say that a lot of people, myself included, were more miffed about the way you attacked him for petty reasons, rather than that. 2. He makes a huge point about saying that everyone should be open to criticism, yet on [[https://np.reddit.com/r/GradeAUnderA/comments/4ht7fr/transparency_is_key_more_info_in_comments/ Reddit, he tried to delete a thread criticizing him for getting "annoyed" by it]]. Honestly, I was starting to like this guy's content, but these events turned me off from his videos.

* ModelOmega: Creator/ProJared's Nuzlocke Challenge is definitely full of drama, but in his Pokemon Y Blind Nuzlocke he seemed to literally fall asleep at the wheel while [[spoiler:battling Grant's Tyrunt. He literally let Chinlo the Quilladin die while fighting, even after he saw that his speed was lowered to the point that the Tyrunt was outspeeding him, even after he had 22 Hp left, even after outright stating that Weplus the Cubone could beat the Tyrunt no problem. But kept Chinlo in regardless and surprise! He died!!]] And the worst part was that he didn't seem to care at all, the sombre music that typically accompanies deaths was gone, and he has never mentioned [[spoiler:Chinlo]] since. Which leads me and many others to wonder if he did that just for drama.

* Tropers/RWBYraikou888: I used to really like WebVideo/MangaKamen's content, especially during his days in WebOriginal/TheCommentaryCommunity when he primarily used Skull Kamen. I was always invested in his ''Franchise/{{Pokemon}}'' and ''Franchise/AceAttorney'' content, always got a kick out of him knocking the ivory off the towers of people like Verlisify, and while I am admittedly a fan of ''WebVideo/GameTheory'', I still enjoyed his content that ragged on it as sort of a balancing act. However, two events eventually made me realize he had become increasingly arrogant and antagonistic, and led me to [[BrokenPedestal outright unsubscribe from him]]. Firstly, his disdain towards ''WebAnimation/{{RWBY}}''. As soon as he first uploaded "What's Wrong with RWBY?!", I knew that his channel was [[ThisIsGonnaSuck about to take a dark turn]]. Now, him not being a fan of ''RWBY'' isn't a problem in its own right, as the show has a few blemishes that could be amended, but the way that the video was presented reigned eerily similar to the likes of Creator/LilyOrchard, who, last I checked, he had no respect for following her transition to more rant-based content. If it had been as simple as "Why RWBY Doesn't Do Enough For Me", I feel like it could have been more digestible, but the fact that he ended up hopping on the bandwagon of turning ''RWBY'' into the internet's second-biggest punching bag after ''Sonic'' made me realize how far gone he had been compared to his previous videos, where he delivered takedowns to people who deserved it. What made things even worse was a Reddit thread I found where he discussed with a ''RWBY'' fan that he keeps talking down on the show because he think there are an uneven amount of defenders and detractors weighing too hard on the side of defenders, but if the amount of influence spread by the likes of Vexed Viewer and Hero Hei are any indication, I think he's got it backwards. The fact that he hasn't stopped the ''RWBY'' backlash to this day only reinforces how I feel he's too arrogant to see reason. Second, and the thing that actually made me unsubscribe from him, is his unfriendly rivalry with [=TheMetalBlade5=]. Now, don't get me wrong, I feel as though Metal was just as in the wrong as him, and I also unsubscribed from his channel following his attempt at ranting on the ''[[Manga/JoJosBizarreAdventureGoldenWind Golden Wind]]'' dub and subsequent calling out of [=RiverDude=] Covers, but everything that Kamen tried to deny about his distorting of Metal's attempt at reasonable discussion and adding fuel to the fire made me come to realize that Kamen holds a perpetual NeverMyFault attitude, and after removing his jokes of Skull Kamen being a perpetual ButtMonkey for his attempts at naysaying, it made me find out just how egotistical he could get. The fact that I used to be a fan of both Kamen and Metal made me feel bummed out that the two could never see reason, as it meant that Metal would have his image at the time sullied further, while Kamen descended more and more into self-importance and couldn't be reached out to. In the end, I felt as though [=MangaKamen=] was a breath of fresh air in the vitriolic world of [=YouTube=] commentaries, but ultimately [[HeWhoFightsMonsters became the thing he was initially subverting]].

:Tropers/ExplodingCreeper14 I want to see links of what you said. I believe you, but I wanna see what exactly they said. I'm curious.

* Saberwulf2018: WebVideo/TheCriticalDrinker's [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-LKaBY222KQ review]] of ''Film/RamboLastBlood'' failed in so many ways possible, with most of it relying heavily on Critical Research Failure (no pun intended). First off, while ''Last Blood'' was meant to be the GrandFinale of the ''Rambo'' saga as a whole, he's not the kind of character to get an epic poignant heroic sendoff. He even goes as far as to claim that he isn't Rambo at all, despite being played by Creator/SylvesterStallone, due to him being more talkative, clean-cut, and easy-going, even going as far as to call him an imposter. He had just came home for once, and stayed there peacefully for years. In the [[Film/FirstBlood first film]], he got back from Vietnam and hadn't settled back yet. In [[Film/RamboFirstBloodPartII the second]], he just got out of prison. [[Film/RamboIII The third]], he was living peacefully in Thailand and was raising money to help monks build a monastery. In [[Film/RamboIV the fourth]], Rambo was depressed and nihilistic and wanted to stay isolated from society. Now come the fifth film, Rambo had found a home, stayed settled for years, and also raised a family. He was also on pills to cope with his PTSD. And Rambo built a tunnel under his home because he was a Vietnam vet, and it was heavily inspired by the Vietcong utilizing the underground tunnel network during the war. Then he goes as far as to criticize not saying which college Gabriela was going to. I thought starting off on general education was what was needed before deciding what field you were to major in. Gabriela's father was just meant to be irredeemable and selfish, and besides, most baddies in ''Rambo'' were always one-dimensional. And the reason why Rambo didn't do any recon in an urban environment is probably because of him being on his pills for his illness. Also, the HumanTraffickers [[BondVillainStupidity keeping Rambo alive]] [[NoHoldsBarredBeatdown after beating him to near death]] was out of pure arrogance, as well as Rambo being so easy to gang up on and not seemingly pose a threat. They also wanted to make an example out of him and Gabriela so that they could scare away anyone who confronted them. When Rambo went back to rescue Gabriela from the traffickers, [[DropTheHammer he used a hammer on them]], not an axe. And when Rambo stopped taking the pills, that was when he decided to go back to killing. Again, the pills kept his PTSD at bay. The reason why he built his tunnel to be wired with explosives was because he wanted to make Hugo and his men feel desperation, fear, and helplessness, like what Gabriela did. And the villains did figure out that Rambo was responsible for one of their brothels getting hit, but Hugo had told Victor to let it go and ignore him, to just go back to business. And the worst thing is him criticizing TheStinger, where Rambo rides into the sunset rather than have him die from his wounds. Rambo is not the kind of character to be killed off so easily, it's almost as if he wanted Rambo to die in the end. While he may not have hated the film out of political differences like what most critics have been, I still feel like he was just being spiteful towards it.