History DethroningMoment / WebOriginal

21st Jun '17 3:34:50 PM Sammettik
Is there an issue? Send a Message


* JetpackPercy: I saw a few reviews from this text-based web reviewer on Website/DeviantART, called Media Man, and one part was just so cruel, and so infuriating, I vowed not to watch him? What was it? Well, it was his [[http://mixedfan8643.deviantart.com/art/The-Media-Man-Top-11-WORST-Simpsons-Episodes-430646493 Top 10 Worst Simpsons Episode List]], specifically, his entry for "Boys of Bummer". Now, it wasn't a DMOS because he bashed an episode, a character, or the series as a whole. It was the entry where he says that Bart deserved the abuse, and "it makes this episode worth watching," claiming because that Bart was an ass in other episodes, he deserved to be [[SarcasmMode rightfully]] bullied in this episode. As indicated by the [[DethroningMoment/TheSimpsons DMOS page]] for ''WesternAnimation/TheSimpsons'', Bart was constantly bullied by the entire town, including encouragement to commit suicide near the end. All he did wrong in the episode was miss a fly ball. He didn't deserved to be bullied, no matter what Media Man says. He also says that the town [[Heartwarming/TheSimpsons helping Bart to regain his confidence,]] and not lock the entire city of Springfield into irredeemable territory, was selfish, mean-spirited and cruel to the other team (What, [[SarcasmMode are they going to commit suicide for making a child you don't like feel better]]), and that Marge was in the wrong for chewing out the town. Well, if he thinks that 10-year-olds he doesn't like should be [[SarcasmMode "rightfully"]] tortured to the point of committing suicide for screwing up only ONCE, then consider me out for watching him in the foreseen future.

to:

* JetpackPercy: I saw a few reviews from this text-based web reviewer on Website/DeviantART, called Media Man, and one part was just so cruel, and so infuriating, I vowed not to watch him? What was it? Well, it was his [[http://mixedfan8643.deviantart.com/art/The-Media-Man-Top-11-WORST-Simpsons-Episodes-430646493 Top "Top 10 Worst Simpsons Episode List]], List", specifically, his entry for "Boys of Bummer". Now, it wasn't a DMOS because he bashed an episode, a character, or the series as a whole. It was the entry where he says that Bart deserved the abuse, and "it makes this episode worth watching," claiming because that Bart was an ass in other episodes, he deserved to be [[SarcasmMode rightfully]] bullied in this episode. As indicated by the [[DethroningMoment/TheSimpsons DMOS page]] for ''WesternAnimation/TheSimpsons'', Bart was constantly bullied by the entire town, including encouragement to commit suicide near the end. All he did wrong in the episode was miss a fly ball. He didn't deserved to be bullied, no matter what Media Man says. He also says that the town [[Heartwarming/TheSimpsons helping Bart to regain his confidence,]] and not lock the entire city of Springfield into irredeemable territory, was selfish, mean-spirited and cruel to the other team (What, [[SarcasmMode are they going to commit suicide for making a child you don't like feel better]]), and that Marge was in the wrong for chewing out the town. Well, if he thinks that 10-year-olds he doesn't like should be [[SarcasmMode "rightfully"]] tortured to the point of committing suicide for screwing up only ONCE, then consider me out for watching him in the foreseen future.



** ElSquibbonator: As of today, he has re-written the aforementioned in a more nuanced and less aggravating manner. He still admits to disliking ''WesternAnimation/TheSimpsons'', but he apologizes for the insulting tone of the previous version.
21st Jun '17 1:38:14 AM Sammettik
Is there an issue? Send a Message


* Tropers/{{deeman45}} I didn't even give him that far of a chance. You mentioned that he's a GrammarNazi? That's putting it lightly--he has banned people for misplacing commas! Frequently in comments that show support for him! I mean, I enjoy proper grammar as much as the next person, but pull the stick OUT of your ass, LetsPlay/DeceasedCrab.



* Vexer Normally I love the EC guys, but sometimes they can really go off the deep end(I.E. their videos about "Hatred" and "Call of Juarez: The Cartel"), but by far their absolute worst episode bar none would have to be "The Division: Problematic Meaning in Mechanics" which is the worst case of CriticalResearchFailure and PoliticalCorrectnessGoneMad that i've ever seen. It's abundantly clear that the EC guys only played the game for a couple of hours, as they claim the game is about gunning down innocent civilians, which is a blatant lie as all the NPCs you have to kill are hostile to you from the start and all belong to violent gangs which kill and terrorize innocent people. They also assume that the game is "racist" cause the enemies wear hoodies, they apparently did not take into consideration that the game was made by a Swedish developer, so it's very likely they did not realize that people would misinterpret it. The EC guys also painfully try and make a case about how the game is supporting Totalitarianism, which it clearly is not since society itself has collapsed, also their points about being "judge jury and executioner" fall flat considering New York is under martial law, which means due process is suspended. I could go on and on about how many errors that video has, but my overall point is that the EC guys were letting emotion overtake logic and completely failing to do any actual research on the game itself, and in the past EC were good about responding to criticism from people about their videos, but not anymore it seems, as they never apologized for the inaccuracies in this video or the ones in the "Cartel" and "Hatred" episodes.

to:

* Vexer Vexer: Normally I love the EC guys, but sometimes they can really go off the deep end(I.E. their videos about "Hatred" and "Call of Juarez: The Cartel"), but by far their absolute worst episode bar none would have to be "The Division: Problematic Meaning in Mechanics" which is the worst case of CriticalResearchFailure and PoliticalCorrectnessGoneMad that i've ever seen. It's abundantly clear that the EC guys only played the game for a couple of hours, as they claim the game is about gunning down innocent civilians, which is a blatant lie as all the NPCs you have to kill are hostile to you from the start and all belong to violent gangs which kill and terrorize innocent people. They also assume that the game is "racist" cause the enemies wear hoodies, they apparently did not take into consideration that the game was made by a Swedish developer, so it's very likely they did not realize that people would misinterpret it. The EC guys also painfully try and make a case about how the game is supporting Totalitarianism, which it clearly is not since society itself has collapsed, also their points about being "judge jury and executioner" fall flat considering New York is under martial law, which means due process is suspended. I could go on and on about how many errors that video has, but my overall point is that the EC guys were letting emotion overtake logic and completely failing to do any actual research on the game itself, and in the past EC were good about responding to criticism from people about their videos, but not anymore it seems, as they never apologized for the inaccuracies in this video or the ones in the "Cartel" and "Hatred" episodes.
18th Jun '17 12:18:49 PM nombretomado
Is there an issue? Send a Message


* TroperWall/Sugarp1e1: I didn't appreciate the seventh entry of Website/ScrewAttack's [[https://youtu.be/fZuki3QTb2s Top 10 Worst Cartoons Based on Video Games list]]; [[spoiler:BlazBlue: Alter Memory.]] It's not the fact that Nervous Nick doesn't like [[spoiler:BlazBlue]] that's the problem (I've never even played the game or watched the anime). As with my PhantomStrider entry above, my problem with this list is his reason for putting it on the list as well as his elitist attitude about the whole thing. He starts the entry off by making it clear that he doesn't like the game's world or story, having a very PlayTheGameSkipTheStory attitude about it. Okay, fine. But judging by the clips of the anime he used, [[spoiler:Alter Memory]] is actually a pretty faithful adaptation. So why is it bad according to Nick? [[BiasSteamroller Because it's a faithful adaptation of a game he never liked to begin with.]] His bias behind this is clear, what with him spending the entire entry summarizing the story in way that makes it sound even more confusing than it really is (instead of just explaining why he finds it confusing) and ending the entry with him absolutely losing his [[PrecisionFStrike shit]] over how much he hates [[spoiler:BlazBlue]]'s story (especially the whole [[spoiler:StableTimeLoop]] plot point), claiming "I see [[spoiler:BlazBlue]] for what it really is! It's a mess! I hate it! That's why it's #7." Um, Nick? [[OpinionMyopia Are you implying that the people who do like the story are idiotic sheep?]] To me, it sounds like he's genuinely proclaiming himself to be [[FanHater better than the fans]] because he can't get past the story. Don't get me wrong; I totally agree that the [[spoiler:StableTimeLoop]] is confusing, especially at the end when [[spoiler:the cycle is finally broken]], but I wouldn't yell at my audience that "The story sucks!" in a way that suggests my subjective opinion is objective fact. And considering how he goes from screaming his lungs out to calmly moving on to #6, it was PlayedForLaughs. You probably also noticed that this DMOS sounds more like I'm talking about the game and not the anime. Nick's tirade was the same way. On top of all that, [[MurderArsonAndJaywalking #7 was the only entry on the list that wasn't an adaptation of a game he liked.]] If he never liked [[spoiler:BlazBlue]] to begin with, then he's in no position to tell us that [[spoiler:Alter Memory]] is a bad adaptation just because it's faithful to the source material.

to:

* TroperWall/Sugarp1e1: I didn't appreciate the seventh entry of Website/ScrewAttack's [[https://youtu.be/fZuki3QTb2s Top 10 Worst Cartoons Based on Video Games list]]; [[spoiler:BlazBlue: Alter Memory.[[spoiler:Anime/BlazBlueAlterMemory.]] It's not the fact that Nervous Nick doesn't like [[spoiler:BlazBlue]] [[spoiler:Franchise/BlazBlue]] that's the problem (I've never even played the game or watched the anime). As with my PhantomStrider entry above, my problem with this list is his reason for putting it on the list as well as his elitist attitude about the whole thing. He starts the entry off by making it clear that he doesn't like the game's world or story, having a very PlayTheGameSkipTheStory attitude about it. Okay, fine. But judging by the clips of the anime he used, [[spoiler:Alter Memory]] is actually a pretty faithful adaptation. So why is it bad according to Nick? [[BiasSteamroller Because it's a faithful adaptation of a game he never liked to begin with.]] His bias behind this is clear, what with him spending the entire entry summarizing the story in way that makes it sound even more confusing than it really is (instead of just explaining why he finds it confusing) and ending the entry with him absolutely losing his [[PrecisionFStrike shit]] over how much he hates [[spoiler:BlazBlue]]'s [[spoiler:[=BlazBlue=]]]'s story (especially the whole [[spoiler:StableTimeLoop]] plot point), claiming "I see [[spoiler:BlazBlue]] [[spoiler:[=BlazBlue=]]] for what it really is! It's a mess! I hate it! That's why it's #7." Um, Nick? [[OpinionMyopia Are you implying that the people who do like the story are idiotic sheep?]] To me, it sounds like he's genuinely proclaiming himself to be [[FanHater better than the fans]] because he can't get past the story. Don't get me wrong; I totally agree that the [[spoiler:StableTimeLoop]] is confusing, especially at the end when [[spoiler:the cycle is finally broken]], but I wouldn't yell at my audience that "The story sucks!" in a way that suggests my subjective opinion is objective fact. And considering how he goes from screaming his lungs out to calmly moving on to #6, it was PlayedForLaughs. You probably also noticed that this DMOS sounds more like I'm talking about the game and not the anime. Nick's tirade was the same way. On top of all that, [[MurderArsonAndJaywalking #7 was the only entry on the list that wasn't an adaptation of a game he liked.]] If he never liked [[spoiler:BlazBlue]] [[spoiler:[=BlazBlue=]]] to begin with, then he's in no position to tell us that [[spoiler:Alter Memory]] is a bad adaptation just because it's faithful to the source material.
17th Jun '17 10:44:43 AM FromtheWordsofBR
Is there an issue? Send a Message


* [=FromtheWordsofBR=]: I used to really enjoy ''Scientifically Accurate'', but I knew from the get-go that ''Scientifically Accurate [[WesternAnimation/MyLittlePonyFriendshipIsMagic My Little Pony]]'' was going to be a huge mess. Shockingly enough, though, the only brony-bashing there is is a mention of how [[spoiler:[[{{Squick}} Beijing considers horse privates a delicacy]]]] (then again, I didn't mind the brony-bashing line in "Today Was a Good Day on the Internet" because everything else in that one was well-executed and [[EarWorm catchy]]). Unfortunately, the rest of the video is just dull. The accurate stuff isn't as hilariously sick and twisted as the other videos are, being just normal stuff real-life horses do. Sure, other videos do that sort of thing, but it's nowhere near as soul-suckingly humorless as it is in this installment.

to:

* [=FromtheWordsofBR=]: I used to really enjoy ''Scientifically Accurate'', but I knew from the get-go that ''Scientifically Accurate [[WesternAnimation/MyLittlePonyFriendshipIsMagic My Little Pony]]'' was going to be a huge mess. Shockingly enough, though, the only brony-bashing there is is a mention of how [[spoiler:[[{{Squick}} Beijing considers horse privates a delicacy]]]] (then again, I didn't mind the brony-bashing line in "Today Was a Good Day on the Internet" because everything else in that one was well-executed and [[EarWorm catchy]]). Unfortunately, the rest of the video is just dull. The dull; the accurate stuff isn't as hilariously sick and twisted as the other videos are, being just normal stuff real-life horses do. and overall the video is just...boring. Sure, other videos do that sort of thing, but IMO it's nowhere near as soul-suckingly humorless as it is in this installment.



* [=FromtheWordsofBR=]: I liked his ''Search for the Worst'' review of the ''WebVideo/{{Fred}}'' Movie Trilogy and even thought the bit with his friend Ralph Sepe was good. However, around 30 minutes in, after snarking about a video where Lucas says he doesn't remember filming the "Fred vs. TheAnnoyingOrange" video, he then says that's the result of blackouts and trying to repress memories. Then the video pauses for Ralph to make a [[OverlyLongGag really long]] [[{{Squick}} and unnecessarily uncomfortable]] child molestation joke. It goes on for what feels like forever (it lasts a minute!), it contradicts some of Alex's points regarding comedy (in that jokes need a punchline to be funny... this one doesn't, it's also very similar to a scene in the movie Alex also criticized for also being drawn-out), and worst of all, [[DudeNotFunny it's not funny, not even in the black sort of sense]]. It's especially jarring given that Ralph's own videos generally avoid using drawn-out gags like that most of the time. Still a damn good video either way, but good lord.

to:

* [=FromtheWordsofBR=]: I liked his ''Search for the Worst'' review of the ''WebVideo/{{Fred}}'' Movie Trilogy and even thought the bit with his friend Ralph Sepe Ralphthemoviemaker was good. However, around 30 minutes in, after snarking about a video where Lucas says he doesn't remember filming the "Fred vs. TheAnnoyingOrange" video, he then says that's the result of blackouts and trying to repress memories. Then the video pauses for Ralph to make a [[OverlyLongGag really long]] [[{{Squick}} and unnecessarily uncomfortable]] child molestation joke. It The squickiness of the joke isn't what bothered me--it goes on for what feels like forever (it lasts a minute!), it contradicts some of Alex's points regarding comedy (in that jokes need a punchline to be funny... this one doesn't, it's also very similar to a scene in the movie Alex also criticized for also being drawn-out), an entire minute and worst of all, [[DudeNotFunny it's not overall just isn't funny, not even in the black a BlackComedy sort of sense]]. It's sense. What makes this especially jarring given is that Ralph's Ralph doesn't normally do this sort of thing in his own videos generally avoid using drawn-out gags like that most of the time.videos. Still a damn good video either way, but good lord.
15th Jun '17 6:53:02 AM StFan
Is there an issue? Send a Message


%%* HulkingCetacean: JoshScorcher for "Response to Lily Peet" for completely different reasons than that videos comment section would say I would call it a DMOS ... i used to think he used to be a good person who didnt like the dark side of the internet... then he went to 8chan and Kiwi farms to dig up their posts on Lily Peet they have kept in a stalker-like fashion and THEN in the video tells his fans not to send her death threats and has never called them out like he has done before when they inevitably did (and they linked proof that they did in the comment section of the video) but the fact that he calls himself a Christian and openly went to hate filled sites that stand for everything that Christianity is against disgusts me.

to:

%%* HulkingCetacean: JoshScorcher Creator/JoshScorcher for "Response to Lily Peet" for completely different reasons than that videos comment section would say I would call it a DMOS ... i used to think he used to be a good person who didnt like the dark side of the internet... then he went to 8chan and Kiwi farms to dig up their posts on Lily Peet they have kept in a stalker-like fashion and THEN in the video tells his fans not to send her death threats and has never called them out like he has done before when they inevitably did (and they linked proof that they did in the comment section of the video) but the fact that he calls himself a Christian and openly went to hate filled sites that stand for everything that Christianity is against disgusts me.
12th Jun '17 8:13:52 AM ElSquibbonator
Is there an issue? Send a Message

Added DiffLines:

** ElSquibbonator: As of today, he has re-written the aforementioned in a more nuanced and less aggravating manner. He still admits to disliking ''WesternAnimation/TheSimpsons'', but he apologizes for the insulting tone of the previous version.
10th Jun '17 1:26:31 PM nombretomado
Is there an issue? Send a Message


* Troper/{{Lhipenwhe}}: Two incidents that soured me on the WhateleyUniverse; one incident where the rape of a villain was/could be seen by the protagonists and readers as 'just desserts', and the flat-out rape and forceful mutation by a story character. Rape can be a hard topic to cover, but in these instances it completely wrecked whatever enjoyment I took from the stories.

to:

* Troper/{{Lhipenwhe}}: Two incidents that soured me on the WhateleyUniverse; Literature/WhateleyUniverse; one incident where the rape of a villain was/could be seen by the protagonists and readers as 'just desserts', and the flat-out rape and forceful mutation by a story character. Rape can be a hard topic to cover, but in these instances it completely wrecked whatever enjoyment I took from the stories.
10th Jun '17 8:49:55 AM SorPepita
Is there an issue? Send a Message


* Troper/{{cricri3007}}: Now, I really like LetsPlay/BobLennon (a French Youtuber), but there is one of his let's play I just can't watch without wanting to punch him in the face. It's his ''VideoGame/DyingLight'' one. Yes, zombies games are extremley common and Dying Light doesn't really go for something too original. Yes, he had already pointed the PlotHoles and clichés of pretty much every game he's played. But in this one he almost never stop mocking the game for it's ClicheStorm. And, as bad as his frequent mocking of the game is, even worse is his RunningGag about NeckSnaping people. It's introduced after [[spoiler:Kyle has to kill Rahim after he turned into a zombie]] and from on it never stop. And the fact that he plays Kyle (an extremly NiceGuy) as a "bad guy from Manga/FistOfTheNorthStar" just adds to it. Not to mention that he doesn't seem to pay attention to the story that much.
* nickpomar825: I really liked a fair amount of KipkKay's videos, even when he started making his videos based around who was sponsoring him. However in his earbud life hack video, the end has him talking about how "sad" he was over the death of David Bowie whilst telling his viewers about how he was listening to a David Bowie biography bought from Audible. Now, I myself was never the biggest fan of David Bowie, but KipKay using his death to promote the people sponsoring his videos seemed downright scummy.

to:

* Troper/{{cricri3007}}: Now, I really like LetsPlay/BobLennon (a French Youtuber), but there is one of his let's play I just can't watch without wanting to punch him in the face. It's his ''VideoGame/DyingLight'' one. Yes, zombies games are extremley common and Dying Light doesn't really go for something too original. Yes, he had already pointed the PlotHoles and clichés of pretty much every game he's played. But in this one he almost never stop mocking the game for it's ClicheStorm. And, as bad as his frequent mocking of the game is, even worse is his RunningGag about NeckSnaping [[NeckSnap Neck Snaping]] people. It's introduced after [[spoiler:Kyle has to kill Rahim after he turned into a zombie]] and from on it never stop. And the fact that he plays Kyle (an extremly NiceGuy) as a "bad guy from Manga/FistOfTheNorthStar" just adds to it. Not to mention that he doesn't seem to pay attention to the story that much.
* nickpomar825: I really liked a fair amount of KipkKay's [=KipkKay=]'s videos, even when he started making his videos based around who was sponsoring him. However in his earbud life hack video, the end has him talking about how "sad" he was over the death of David Bowie whilst telling his viewers about how he was listening to a David Bowie biography bought from Audible. Now, I myself was never the biggest fan of David Bowie, but KipKay [=KipKay=] using his death to promote the people sponsoring his videos seemed downright scummy.



** Troper/((shonengirl)): Hoo boy, his ''Franchise/{{Pokemon}}'' video... Its hard to point out one moment in particular, but it's basically a series of "jokes" (I think) that have already been beat up to death, revived, HM01'd into tiny pieces, beat up again, horn drilled, and incinerated. And I seriously couldn't tell if it was all supposed to be a bunch of jokes or not due to many of the "jokes" (mainly "hurdy durr Pokeymanz is animal abuse!") being things said with complete seriousness before, and it comes off a lot like some cringy "scrub" ranting about something he knows nothing about, or at least has never played since gen I. The blatant CriticalResearchFailure all over the place was just painful to sit through, so much so I had to skip through tiny segments of it. This was especially jarring since he pulled up the gen I manual, something only hardcore fans usually do, and actually knew that Red is 11... But yet calls Red "Ash", something that no Pokemon fan over 12 would ever do, and he should be relieved that he wasn't swarmed by rabid Red fans by some miracle. If those were jokes, they weren't funny. It doesn't help that the description made me put my hopes up. The only things that were good or new were the bit about him actually getting Red and Blue's ages right, and the mocking of the deviation of game text from what's said in the manual. Everything else is just so cliche and overdone, and I expect more from him. Not to mention it feels like he's trying to jump on the hype train of second wave Pokemania because he can, and free cash. Get gud, Grade, get gud.

to:

** Troper/((shonengirl)): Hoo boy, his ''Franchise/{{Pokemon}}'' video... Its It's hard to point out one moment in particular, but it's basically a series of "jokes" (I think) that have already been beat beaten up to death, revived, HM01'd into tiny pieces, beat up again, horn drilled, and incinerated. And I seriously couldn't tell if it was all supposed to be a bunch of jokes or not due to many of the "jokes" (mainly "hurdy durr Pokeymanz is animal abuse!") being things said with complete seriousness before, and it comes off a lot like some cringy "scrub" ranting about something he knows nothing about, or at least has never played since gen I. The blatant CriticalResearchFailure all over the place was just painful to sit through, so much so I had to skip through tiny segments of it. This was especially jarring since he pulled up the gen I manual, something only hardcore fans usually do, and actually knew that Red is 11... But yet calls Red "Ash", something that no Pokemon fan over 12 would ever do, and he should be relieved that he wasn't swarmed by rabid Red fans by some miracle. If those were jokes, they weren't funny. It doesn't help that the description made me put my hopes up. The only things that were good or new were the bit about him actually getting Red and Blue's ages right, and the mocking of the deviation of game text from what's said in the manual. Everything else is just so cliche and overdone, and I expect more from him. Not to mention it feels like he's trying to jump on the hype train of second wave Pokemania because he can, and free cash. Get gud, Grade, get gud.



* hydrix: How to recognize a Great/Bad anime in just one episode (by digitbro) is something I watch in general to give myself an idea how you can animate a great opening for something that will last very long and a decent chunk of it is well-made/well-explained... until part 2 when he talks about Anime/LuckyStar . Now, the beginning of part 2 already was more of "defending openings I like other people don't" instead of "how a great opening to an anime is structured", but it at least did talk about how these openings still manage to still make a good impression upon first-time viewing, which makes it disappointing for me when he talks more about how the opening of Lucky Star was [[OvershadowedByControversy controversial]] and [[SmallNameBigEgo how he can relate to this opening, outright ignoring that not everyone feels the same way he does]]. The next episode is indeed much better, but that part gives you about the same degree of satisfaction as hearing someone that says that he is going to talk about great paintings only to stop in front of one masturbating while watching it. If the anime community is so toxic that users actively and permanently engage in such behavior it goddamn sucks.

to:

* hydrix: How to recognize a Great/Bad anime in just one episode (by digitbro) is something I watch in general to give myself an idea how you can animate a great opening for something that will last very long and a decent chunk of it is well-made/well-explained... until part 2 when he talks about Anime/LuckyStar .Anime/LuckyStar. Now, the beginning of part 2 already was more of "defending openings I like other people don't" instead of "how a great opening to an anime is structured", but it at least did talk about how these openings still manage to still make a good impression upon first-time viewing, which makes it disappointing for me when he talks more about how the opening of Lucky Star was [[OvershadowedByControversy controversial]] and [[SmallNameBigEgo how he can relate to this opening, outright ignoring that not everyone feels the same way he does]]. The next episode is indeed much better, but that part gives you about the same degree of satisfaction as hearing someone that says that he is going to talk about great paintings only to stop in front of one masturbating while watching it. If the anime community is so toxic that users actively and permanently engage in such behavior it goddamn sucks.



%%* HulkingCetacean: JoshScorcher for "Response to Lily Peet" for completely different reasons than that videos comment section would say i would call it a DMOS ... i used to think he used to be a good person who didnt like the dark side of the internet... then he went to 8chan and Kiwi farms to dig up their posts on Lily Peet they have kept in a stalker-like fashion and THEN in the video tells his fans not to send her death threats and has never called them out like he has done before when they inevitably did (and they linked proof that they did in the comment section of the video) but the fact that he calls himself a Christian and openly went to hate filled sites that stand for everything that Christianity is against disgusts me.

to:

%%* HulkingCetacean: JoshScorcher for "Response to Lily Peet" for completely different reasons than that videos comment section would say i I would call it a DMOS ... i used to think he used to be a good person who didnt like the dark side of the internet... then he went to 8chan and Kiwi farms to dig up their posts on Lily Peet they have kept in a stalker-like fashion and THEN in the video tells his fans not to send her death threats and has never called them out like he has done before when they inevitably did (and they linked proof that they did in the comment section of the video) but the fact that he calls himself a Christian and openly went to hate filled sites that stand for everything that Christianity is against disgusts me.



* Asue: hotdiggedydemon's [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xCTcUUYCoBk review of The Powerpuff Girls 2016 reboot]] was a massive disappointment. Now, I do admit to like hdd's stuff (through I don't really like his gross jokes). But this was... Ugh. First of all, this review came waaaaaaay after the initial reaction towards the show (in December of 2016, while the show premiered on April 4, eight months earlier), a.k.a it's old news. I wouldn't usually have a problem with someone reviewing something that was reviewed to death, as long as they bring something new to the table. But he didn't. None of his points were any original or felt fresh whatsoever (from ranting about the reboot toning down the violence, which isn't the cartoon's fault but rather because of the MoralGuardians who complained about the original show's violence, to talk about the main characters not getting their old voice actresses back to the twerking bit). Second, his smug tone during the video made him look like he was trying way too hard to be like "I know better than you, Powerpuff Girls 2016 team" (especially when he actually challenges them to watch this video, which reeks of [[SmallNameBigEgo pretentiousness]]) and made me cringe. And third, he was reading too much into the supposed "anti-feminism" stuff (which was made up just to make the show look like a sexist piece of crap while not even trying to be funny in the process). And this is coming from someone who thought the reboot was "meh". (Also, what was up with that random TakeThat towards ''Franchise/StarWars'' at the end? That was pointless and not even remotely connected to the review at all.)

to:

* Asue: hotdiggedydemon's [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xCTcUUYCoBk review of The Powerpuff Girls 2016 reboot]] was a massive disappointment. Now, I do admit to like hdd's stuff (through I don't really like his gross jokes). But this was... Ugh. First of all, this review came waaaaaaay after the initial reaction towards the show (in December of 2016, while the show premiered on April 4, eight months earlier), a.k.a it's old news. I wouldn't usually have a problem with someone reviewing something that was reviewed to death, as long as they bring something new to the table. But he didn't. None of his points were any original or felt fresh whatsoever (from ranting about the reboot toning down the violence, which isn't the cartoon's fault but rather because of the MoralGuardians who complained about the original show's violence, to talk talking about the main characters not getting their old voice actresses back to the twerking bit). Second, his smug tone during the video made him look like he was trying way too hard to be like "I know better than you, Powerpuff Girls 2016 team" (especially when he actually challenges them to watch this video, which reeks of [[SmallNameBigEgo pretentiousness]]) and made me cringe. And third, he was reading too much into the supposed "anti-feminism" stuff (which was made up just to make the show look like a sexist piece of crap while not even trying to be funny in the process). And this is coming from someone who thought the reboot was "meh". (Also, what was up with that random TakeThat towards ''Franchise/StarWars'' at the end? That was pointless and not even remotely connected to the review at all.)



* Tropers/ImSpidey2: I'm not that much of a fan of [=TechRax=]. While I do like some of his videos, I always found his commentary a bit annoying. I unsubscribed to him today however, upon seeing WebVideo/{{Pyrocynical}} trash his latest video, ''[[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=arVHjiNLDXY Casting Cockroaches + iPhone 7 Plus in Molten Aluminum!]]''. NauseaFuel aside, Tara (Tech himself) seems completely ignorant to the cockroaches' suffering (which, by the way, [[HellIsThatNoise you can hear their squeaking as they burn]]), even snickering a few times at them. I always found Tech to be a bit stupid, but this made him hit, as Pyro said, "a new low". And at the end, [[BlatantLies he has the gull to say that they're "asleep" at the end]]. [[{{Squick}} As one just clings to life in the corner of the tray.]] Yeah, you know what? Fuck you, Tara. You just lost a sub, and hopefully thousands more will follow after watching this twisted excuse of "entertainment".

to:

* Tropers/ImSpidey2: I'm not that much of a fan of [=TechRax=]. While I do like some of his videos, I always found his commentary a bit annoying. I unsubscribed to him today however, upon seeing WebVideo/{{Pyrocynical}} trash his latest video, ''[[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=arVHjiNLDXY Casting Cockroaches + iPhone 7 Plus in Molten Aluminum!]]''. NauseaFuel aside, Tara (Tech himself) seems completely ignorant to the cockroaches' suffering (which, by the way, [[HellIsThatNoise you can hear their squeaking as they burn]]), even snickering a few times at them. I always found Tech to be a bit stupid, but this made him hit, as Pyro said, "a new low". And at the end, [[BlatantLies he has the gull gall to say that they're "asleep" at the end]]. [[{{Squick}} As one just clings to life in the corner of the tray.]] Yeah, you know what? Fuck you, Tara. You just lost a sub, and hopefully thousands more will follow after watching this twisted excuse of "entertainment".
10th Jun '17 8:37:53 AM SorPepita
Is there an issue? Send a Message


* [=TheLemsterPju=]: I am by no means a recurring watcher of [[RebelTaxi RebelTaxi's]] videos, but one of his videos I have seen had a moment which screamed unnecessary. When he covered The Modifyers in his "Top 10 Failed Animated Pilots" video, you know what one of the first things he does? Adding a scene from Zonesama's hentai video of the main character (Agent Xero) getting tentacle raped by the villain. It is quite obvious that he has a huge fascination for the parody animator, but it served no purpose to the video at all, other than an apparent promotion for Zone, and at the same time makes him come across as a bit of creep. This did not go without SelfDeprication in later videos.

to:

* [=TheLemsterPju=]: I am by no means a recurring watcher of [[RebelTaxi RebelTaxi's]] videos, but one of his videos I have seen had a moment which screamed unnecessary. When he covered The Modifyers in his "Top 10 Failed Animated Pilots" video, you know what one of the first things he does? Adding a scene from Zonesama's hentai video of the main character (Agent Xero) getting tentacle raped by the villain. It is quite obvious that he has a huge fascination for the parody animator, but it served no purpose to the video at all, other than an apparent promotion for Zone, and at the same time makes him come across as a bit of creep. This did not go without SelfDeprication SelfDeprecation in later videos.



** [=SenorCornholio=]: I have a similar complaint from his [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-zJD9B0za9k Pokémon Bootlegs]] video. everything described above applies here: the video is absolutely fantastic. the jokes are on point and gut-bustingly hilarious, but there's one game he could have gone into more detail on, and that's VideoGame/PokemonVietnameseCrystal. He doesn't even go past the opening segment with Professor Oak before switching games. Given that this is a TranslationTrainwreck of [[MemeticMutation memetic degree]], I get that there's probably not much he could say about it that hasn't been said, but that doesn't mean one shouldn't try. [[TheyWastedAPerfectlyGoodPlot He could have at least gotten to]] "[[SugarWiki/CrowningMomentOfFunny BAG FUCK]]" [[TheyWastedAPerfectlyGoodPlot or something and ''then'' quit the game in disgust.]] Once again, I feel like this is one of JonTron's best videos that he's put out, but there was just that one thing he should have gone into more detail about, but didn't.

to:

** [=SenorCornholio=]: I have a similar complaint from his [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-zJD9B0za9k Pokémon Bootlegs]] video. everything Everything described above applies here: the video is absolutely fantastic. fantastic, the jokes are on point and gut-bustingly hilarious, but there's one game he could have gone into more detail on, and that's VideoGame/PokemonVietnameseCrystal. He doesn't even go past the opening segment with Professor Oak before switching games. Given that this is a TranslationTrainwreck of [[MemeticMutation memetic degree]], I get that there's probably not much he could say about it that hasn't been said, but that doesn't mean one shouldn't try. [[TheyWastedAPerfectlyGoodPlot He could have at least gotten to]] "[[SugarWiki/CrowningMomentOfFunny BAG FUCK]]" [[TheyWastedAPerfectlyGoodPlot or something and ''then'' quit the game in disgust.]] Once again, I feel like this is one of JonTron's best videos that he's put out, but there was just that one thing he should have gone into more detail about, but didn't.



* Lord_Chespin: Now, let me make this clear: I do not hate Creepypastas. I admit that, since literally anybody can write them, there are tons of poorly-written ones out there, but there are some decent ones. However, ''Clockwork: Your Time is Up'' has burned me bad, and made me wary of Creepypastas in general. It's ostensibly about the [[DarkAndTroubledPast origin story]] of what could kindly be called a female Jeff the Killer ripoff, and the circumstances that led to her becoming a serial killer. Let's forget the fact that the story uses AbusiveParents and ''[[{{Squick}} incestuous child rape from her brother]]'' for nothing more than shock value and making her rampage justifiable. Let's forget the fact that [[DeusAngstMachina everything goes wrong]] [[DiabolusExMachina for our protagonist]] in an effort to drive her off the deep end, from the aforementioned abuse to bullying. [[RuleOfThree Let's forget]] [[WhatDoYouMeanItsNotSymbolic the shoehorned-in time imagery]]. [[LongList Let's forget]] the how the parents only take her to a therapist after she sews a smile into her face, and how [[AdultsAreUseless the therapist runs off as soon as Natalie, the protagonist, starts to show signs of insanity.]] [[RunningGag Let's forget]] the author's CriticalResearchFailure about how insane asylums work, especially the lack of a term of any kind of medication (the author has a doctor use the term ''"mental drugs"'' to describe the anti-psychotics!). [[OverlyLongGag Let's forget]] [[ArsonMurderAndJaywalking the fact that the author's first name is the same as Natalie's, implying an]] AuthorAvatar. No, the real Dethroning Moment of Suck is when, empowered by the doctors [[PlayingWithSyringes sticking needles into her]], Natalie decides to murder her entire family (including her mother, [[DesignatedVillain who did nothing wrong and even tried to stop her abusive dad!]]). The murders are going to be spoilered for {{Squick}}, as they seem like something out of an [[WesternAnimation/TheSimpsons Itchy and Scratchy cartoon]], but here they are: [[spoiler:for her mother, Natalie slams her head into a coat hanger, causing her to become paralyzed, then cuts open her chest and rips out her still-beating heart until she bleeds to death. The worst part is, [[FromBadToWorse this is the nicest death]]. For her father, the gives him a NoHoldsBarredBeatdown, then squashes him with a bedpost steamroller-style, ''causing him to vomit up all his organs''. Finally, for her brother, she pins him to the wall with her knives, [[EyeScream stabs his eye out with a butter knife]], [[{{Fingore}} rips off his toes and fingers,]] and force-feeds him one of his own fingers until he chokes to death. All of this is written in painstaking detail.]] This is presumably supposed to be their karmatic comeuppance, but it just reeks of DisproportionateRetribution- yes, ''even for the incestuous child rapist brother.'' [[RootingForTheEmpire When you begin to pity the incestuous child rapist, it should be a sign that the author's done something horribly, horribly wrong.]] [[AndThereWasMuchRejoicing To the sorrow of pretty much nobody]], the story seems to have been deleted from Wattpad, [[WebVideo/TheNostalgiaCritic but the evil will never truly go away.]]

to:

* Lord_Chespin: Now, let me make this clear: I do not hate Creepypastas. I admit that, since literally anybody can write them, there are tons of poorly-written ones out there, but there are some decent ones. However, ''Clockwork: Your Time is Up'' has burned me bad, and made me wary of Creepypastas in general. It's ostensibly about the [[DarkAndTroubledPast origin story]] of what could kindly be called a female Jeff the Killer ripoff, and the circumstances that led to her becoming a serial killer. Let's forget the fact that the story uses AbusiveParents and ''[[{{Squick}} incestuous child rape from her brother]]'' for nothing more than shock value and making her rampage justifiable. Let's forget the fact that [[DeusAngstMachina everything goes wrong]] [[DiabolusExMachina for our protagonist]] in an effort to drive her off the deep end, from the aforementioned abuse to bullying. [[RuleOfThree Let's forget]] [[WhatDoYouMeanItsNotSymbolic the shoehorned-in time imagery]]. [[LongList Let's forget]] the how the parents only take her to a therapist after she sews a smile into her face, and how [[AdultsAreUseless the therapist runs off as soon as Natalie, the protagonist, starts to show signs of insanity.]] [[RunningGag Let's forget]] the author's CriticalResearchFailure about how insane asylums work, especially the lack of a term of any kind of medication (the author has a doctor use the term ''"mental drugs"'' to describe the anti-psychotics!). [[OverlyLongGag Let's forget]] [[ArsonMurderAndJaywalking the fact that the author's first name is the same as Natalie's, implying an]] AuthorAvatar. No, the real Dethroning Moment of Suck is when, empowered by the doctors [[PlayingWithSyringes sticking needles into her]], Natalie decides to murder her entire family (including her mother, [[DesignatedVillain who did nothing wrong and even tried to stop her abusive dad!]]). The murders are going to be spoilered for {{Squick}}, as they seem like something out of an [[WesternAnimation/TheSimpsons Itchy and Scratchy cartoon]], but here they are: [[spoiler:for her mother, Natalie slams her head into a coat hanger, causing her to become paralyzed, then cuts open her chest and rips out her still-beating heart until she bleeds to death. The worst part is, [[FromBadToWorse this is the nicest death]]. For her father, the gives him a NoHoldsBarredBeatdown, then squashes him with a bedpost steamroller-style, ''causing him to vomit up all his organs''. Finally, for her brother, she pins him to the wall with her knives, [[EyeScream stabs his eye out with a butter knife]], [[{{Fingore}} rips off his toes and fingers,]] and force-feeds him one of his own fingers until he chokes to death. All of this is written in painstaking detail.]] This is presumably supposed to be their karmatic karmic comeuppance, but it just reeks of DisproportionateRetribution- yes, ''even for the incestuous child rapist brother.'' [[RootingForTheEmpire When you begin to pity the incestuous child rapist, it should be a sign that the author's done something horribly, horribly wrong.]] [[AndThereWasMuchRejoicing To the sorrow of pretty much nobody]], the story seems to have been deleted from Wattpad, [[WebVideo/TheNostalgiaCritic but the evil will never truly go away.]]
10th Jun '17 8:33:43 AM SorPepita
Is there an issue? Send a Message


While the game does encourage increasing the vault population through pregnancy, it never forces all of the women to be pregnant at once and fully allows women to take on the same roles as men, be it fighting and exploring the wasteland or working on maintaining the vault. Fallout is one of the least discriminatory games on the market and its become clear that Anita is just looking for things to complain about to cause controversy. When ''Fallout Shelter'' toned down the violence of the main series she just found something else to complain about. Not liking the games is certainly a fair opinion, but taking the time to actively get offended by mechanics that have been in the series for years now is just [[AttentionWhore attention whoring]]. Get a life Anita.
** hydrix: I have watched the first episode of "Tropes vs. Woman in video games" titled as "The Damsel in Distress" and as someone who, in all honesty, only as bare-bones knowledge about video games (I own a SNES, so yeah) I find the video to be insulting as all hell. So she first mentions the development of Star Fox Adventures, which was first released as an adventure game with a female fox-like protagonist, but later on changed to fit the main character of VideoGame/StarFox as a protagonist, with her as a damsel in distress. That ignores that in general most video games (or at least those that are not shovelware) take a year to make. I might as well use a moral where I say that developers should keep women in a closet during development because the developer of the C64 port of parasol stars saw how his own game was destroyed by his own wife (courtesy of Guru Larry). Then later she talks about the use of it in games such as VideoGame/SuperMarioBros and VideoGame/TheLegendOfZelda series and how it is sexist, outright ignoring that it is more used as a bare-bones plot device rather than anything else. It is insulting to me that those people playing back in the NES days who were playing The Legend of Zelda and widely exploring its world, characters and developments or those playing Super Mario Bros., where they were on a wild adventure with tons of challenges, all get lumped in as sexist morons who were only playing it for the woman/girl at the end. It makes me wonder how the men and women that got the excitement from those series feel about this. In all honesty though, sexism in video games is a thing that needs to be addressed, but what Anita did there was a regurgitation of what already was known back in 1988 with VideoGame/FinalFantasyII , where at one point it is like if you have saved the princess only to get in bed with her to find out that he was doing it with a Lamia Queen, triggering a boss battle where you and all the characters that have been with you up to that point fight against it. It is thus very useless and a waste of time and resources.

to:

While the game does encourage increasing the vault population through pregnancy, it never forces all of the women to be pregnant at once and fully allows women to take on the same roles as men, be it fighting and exploring the wasteland or working on maintaining the vault. Fallout is one of the least discriminatory games on the market and its it's become clear that Anita is just looking for things to complain about to cause controversy. When ''Fallout Shelter'' toned down the violence of the main series she just found something else to complain about. Not liking the games is certainly a fair opinion, but taking the time to actively get offended by mechanics that have been in the series for years now is just [[AttentionWhore attention whoring]]. Get a life Anita.
** hydrix: I have watched the first episode of "Tropes vs. Woman in video games" titled as "The Damsel in Distress" and as someone who, in all honesty, only as has bare-bones knowledge about video games (I own a SNES, so yeah) I find the video to be insulting as all hell. So she first mentions the development of Star Fox Adventures, which was first released as an adventure game with a female fox-like protagonist, but later on changed to fit the main character of VideoGame/StarFox as a protagonist, with her as a damsel in distress. That ignores that in general most video games (or at least those that are not shovelware) take a year to make. I might as well use a moral where I say that developers should keep women in a closet during development because the developer of the C64 port of parasol stars saw how his own game was destroyed by his own wife (courtesy of Guru Larry). Then later she talks about the use of it in games such as VideoGame/SuperMarioBros and VideoGame/TheLegendOfZelda series and how it is sexist, outright ignoring that it is more used as a bare-bones plot device rather than anything else. It is insulting to me that those people playing back in the NES days who were playing The Legend of Zelda and widely exploring its world, characters and developments or those playing Super Mario Bros., where they were on a wild adventure with tons of challenges, all get lumped in as sexist morons who were only playing it for the woman/girl at the end. It makes me wonder how the men and women that got the excitement from those series feel about this. In all honesty though, sexism in video games is a thing that needs to be addressed, but what Anita did there was a regurgitation of what already was known back in 1988 with VideoGame/FinalFantasyII , VideoGame/FinalFantasyII, where at one point it is like if you have saved the princess only to get in bed with her to find out that he was doing it with a Lamia Queen, triggering a boss battle where you and all the characters that have been with you up to that point fight against it. It is thus very useless and a waste of time and resources.
This list shows the last 10 events of 2228. Show all.
http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/article_history.php?article=DethroningMoment.WebOriginal