History DethroningMoment / TheNostalgiaCritic

* Tropers/{{PutYaGunsOn}}: While I'm not necessarily offended at any of the Critic's race-related humor, this one just felt cheap and thrown in there. But that pales in comparison to his cringeworthy joke about Creator/PatMorita as Santa in ''Film/BabesInToyland''. All I [[Recap/TheNostalgiaCriticS4E46 his review]] could see was "lol let's call him [[JapaneseRanguage Santa Craus]] and name the reindeer after Chinese food lol cus he's um...Asian". I don't feel attacked by his jokes at all, it's more about annoyance at the fact that his Asian-related humor at the time hadn't really evolved much past "14-year-old who thinks it's funny to call [[RacialFaceBlindness all Asian people]] Creator/JackieChan". His recent Yogi Bear review (released ''years'' after these reviews) certainly doesn't help his case. [[superscript:(As Yogi and Boo Boo drag a train of picnic tables with a dog on it) "We're eating the dog too! Korean food tonight!"]] While I don't think Doug is necessarily a racist or hateful towards East Asians, I'm convinced he still sees us as socially acceptable targets for a cheap laugh.

* Tropers/{{WillieManga}}: To make two things clear, I hate ''Film/BioDome'' and for the most part, I like Critic's [[Recap/TheNostalgiaCriticS3E13 review of it]]. But one thing that annoyed me is that he continually misnamed Bud, calling him Squirrel. I understand Squirrel is a nickname, but the characters call him Bud more often. With that, you'd think he would call him Bud and make things less confusing. Come on, dude!

* Tropers/{{PutYaGunsOn}}: While I'm not necessarily offended at any of the Critic's race-related humor, this one just felt cheap and thrown in there. But that pales in comparison to his cringeworthy joke about Creator/PatMorita as Santa in ''Film/BabesInToyland''. All I [[Recap/TheNostalgiaCriticS4E46 his review]] could see was "lol let's call him [[JapaneseRanguage Santa Craus]] and name the reindeer after Chinese food lol cus he's um...Asian". I don't feel attacked by his jokes at all, it's more about annoyance at the fact that his Asian-related humor at the time hadn't really evolved much past "14-year-old who thinks it's funny to call [[RacialFaceBlindness all Asian people]] Creator/JackieChan". His recent Yogi Bear review (released ''years'' after these reviews) certainly doesn't help his case. [[superscript:(As Yogi and Boo Boo drag a train of picnic tables with a dog on it) "We're eating the dog too! Korean food tonight!"]] While I don't think Doug is necessarily a racist or hateful towards East Asians, I'm convinced he still sees us as socially acceptable targets for a cheap laugh.

* Scsigs: Since people have stated good points about my other picks, ''Film/HocusPocus'' and the HypeBacklash video, I'll bring up [[Recap/TheNostalgiaCriticEditorial78 his video]] about whitewashing. I get why he wanted to make the video. It was a hot button issue, especially in 2016 where ''everything'' was for little to no reason, depending on what you're talking about. However, his major talking points included live action people playing roles originally meant for people of other ethnicties or physical statures, roles played by people from other countries, and voice acting in both western animation aind anime dubbing. First, the Critic is on the more liberal side of this argument, with saying various things about these topics, but succumbs to not really making any good points about them, with Critical Research Failure, [[DoubleStandard double standards]], and just a plain old failure to use common sense abound. He talks about whitewashing by bringing up ''Film/GhostInTheShell2017'' with casting Creator/ScarlettJohansson as the Major. I can understand this criticism, since it's a film based on a Japanese anime film and its setting is still uniquely Japanese with Asian actors in most of the other roles, but he then praises films that RaceLift white characters. {{Double Standard}}s much? Then he brings up Creator/HenryCavill and Creator/AndrewGarfield playing Superman and Spider-Man, with them both being British (although Garfield was born in America) as disqualifiers for playing these roles. What? Ethnicity and race are 2 completely different things. He then talks about ''Film/TheLordOfTheRings'' casting regular actors over little people except for back shots in some scenes in the roles of the Hobbits. What? Hobbits aren't little people, they're fully grown people that just happen to be smaller than other races. Casting regular people and using either camera tricks, green-screening, or CGI was their best bet at portraying the world most accurately to the books. That argument makes no sense. Then, he also touches upon actors of other races voicing characters in animated works, including anime dubs, that aren't Japanese or whatever race or even gender or age of their characters. First of all, there ''are'' Asian actors working in the anime dubbing industry. Second, the acting pool for anime dubs, unless paid for by a larger company, is rather low, due to usually requiring non-union actors who'll accept the lower pay than union and prelay work, which is why we don't see many high-profile actors who'll slum for less money to do dub work that often. So, it makes sense to use not just Asian actors, who aren't probably going to settle for dubbing work anyways. Also, not every anime is set in Japan. There are several shows and films, Studio Ghibli's in particular, that are set more in worlds of multiple cultures, or just Germanic worlds, so that shouldn't matter anyways. Second, using adults to voice kids ''is'' an industry standard and the norm. It's done to maintain consistency in the characters' voices as long as possible if they don't change in any way, especially if a series goes on for multiple years where a kid's voice would break eventually, so it's a JustifiedTrope. However, there ''have'' been [[SubvertedTrope subversions]] of this in some productions. Third, not every child actor is going to be able to give the most believable performance out there. With how many films he's reviewed as the NC, you'd think he'd remember that. Fourth, anime dubbing is not the same as prelay. It's even challenging for experienced voice actors to do because they have to adapt to a completely different style of voice acting. Most kid actors can't act that well already, so they'd be pretty lost on what to do, though there certainly ''have'' been a few subversions here, like Aaron Dismuke as Al in ''Anime/FullmetalAlchemist2003,'' since he didn't have any mouthflaps to act against, and Daveigh Chase as Chihiro in ''Anime/SpiritedAway'', but they are outliers in this case. This topic is heavily debated everywhere and Doug's serious mishandling of this situation isn't helping matters so much as it confuses them, which is why I don't like this video. You can clearly see why.

* Dark4ngel: Let me say this, yes, I do like ''Film/{{Maleficent}}'', but I do acknowledge it is very flawed and I know that everyone will have their reasons for not liking it. However, just watching a few clips of [[Recap/TheNostalgiaCriticS11E8 Doug's review]] made me wonder if he's either stupid or intentionally ignoring some things to try to make the movie look worse. Like, he says Stefan helps the king destroy the fairies, which is completely untrue. Stefan only hurt Maleficent and never did anything to the Moors afterwards. Then, during the scene where Stefan cuts off Maleficent's wings, he says "Good thing she's such a heavy sleeper" when the movie blatantly points out that he drugged her. Did he have to clean his glasses while watching that scene and he's just blind without them? Then he makes a joke during the scene that even haters of the movie agree is a very emotional scene (when she's crying over her wings): "I didn't even get to find out how they tasted." What. That's where I clicked off.

* SirPellucidar: What annoyed me about [[Recap/TheNostalgiaCriticS11E24 his review]] of Creator/FoxKids review was the segment he spent on ''WesternAnimation/GodzillaTheSeries''. He spent 90% of the time bashing the movie and stating that the series must have sucked because the movie did, all the while making it obvious that he had never actually watched the show. He gave a little nod at the end to how some Godzilla fans enjoyed the cartoon, but that was it. No mention of the fact that the show is universally considered better than the movie, and Zilla Jr. is considered by most fans to legitimately deserve the title of Godzilla, unlike his father from the movie.

** Alienhunter: I removed my earlier post about the review of Fox Kids with the Toonami review. Starting off with an almost 10-minute skit of Critic being old and grumpy because he never really watched Toonami. Then the actual review starts off with Walter, Tamara, Heather, and Malcolm talking about each show for like two minutes. Now, this could still be cool to see with focusing on the history and the specials with Tom, but nope, instead, it focuses on random programs that don't really have much to do with Creator/{{Toonami}}. They would occasionally bring up anime like Anime/SailorMoon, Manga/OnePiece, and Anime/YuYuHakusho, but most of the review was based around on shows that were more played on Creator/CartoonNetwork, like WesternAnimation/TheBatman, WesternAnimation/JusticeLeague, WesternAnimation/ThePowerpuffGirls, WesternAnimation/Ben10AlienForce and... WesternAnimation/StarWarsTheCloneWars... What. Not helping with the Critic (y'know, the reason most people watch the show) randomly sprouting one-liners about whatever show they were talking about and mostly getting screamed at by Walter in the most unfunny way. And don't get me started on the stupid "joke" they did multiple times about them all laughing obnoxiously loudly for like a minute straight, it's not funny, it's loud and, well, obnoxious. Although, I do have to admit that the costume for live-action!Tom was amazing and the voice used for him was spot-on. But that's about it for the nice things that I have for this "review".

* Tropers/{{Samusforce}}: You know, I was nice during the ''TMNT'' reviews, ''Hocus Pocus'', and ''Eragon'', but [[Recap/TheNostalgiaCriticS12E22 his review]] for ''Percy Jackson and the Lighting Thief'' is without a doubt the worst one he has done! Let's ignore that he missed about a dozen and one joke opportunities. What really makes this horrible is the skit that plays during it. Calling it a "Wow, youngsters!" thing doesn't make sense in so many ways. OK, so we have Neo, Eragon, Jubilee, and Harry Potter together in a group. Why? Because they are all "outcasts who are chosen by a supernatural being to combat a threat, and what makes them an outcast gives them the ability to be a hero". What is the problem with this? First of all, Neo was an adult in the movies, had parents, and was not an outcast. Eragon was not an outcast, but a Luke Skywalker ripoff. Jubilee, while being a mutant, was loved by her parents. And Harry Potter was only an outcast with his aunt and uncle--the rest of the school loved him! He then tries to link all four with these tropes that they follow, but anyone with a passing knowledge of the source material would point out how wrong he was. Probably the only one he got right with anything was... none. He even tried to pull the "They don't do cool things while everyone else gets to be awesome." In front of Neo, who made a guy explode from the inside. That is 100% not true. But even ignoring all of that, and what puts this to second place of most hated reviews for me, was the constant smackdown of Harry Potter. I don't even read the books and haven't watched the movies in years, and the constant abuse pissed me off. It was like listening to a bad fanfic where he bashed his hated character. I know Doug constantly refused to put in any research, but this was the worst offender.

* SirPellucidar: What annoyed me about [[Recap/TheNostalgiaCriticS11E24 his review] of Creator/FoxKids review was the segment he spent on ''WesternAnimation/GodzillaTheSeries''. He spent 90% of the time bashing the movie and stating that the series must have sucked because the movie did, all the while making it obvious that he had never actually watched the show. He gave a little nod at the end to how some Godzilla fans enjoyed the cartoon, but that was it. No mention of the fact that the show is universally considered better than the movie, and Zilla Jr. is considered by most fans to legitimately deserve the title of Godzilla, unlike his father from the movie.

* Tropers/{{Samusforce}}: You know, I was nice during the ''TMNT'' reviews, ''Hocus Pocus'', and ''Eragon'', but [[Recap/TheNostalgiaCriticS12E22 his review]] for ''Percy Jackson and the Lighting Thief'' is without a doubt the worst one he has done! Let's ignore that he missed about a dozen and one joke opportunities. What really makes this horrible is the skit that plays during it. Calling it a "Wow, youngsters!" thing doesn't make sense in so many ways. OK, so we have Neo, Eragon, Jubilee, and Harry Potter together in a group. Why? Because they are all "outcasts who are chosen by a supernatural being to combat a threat, and what makes them an outcast gives them the ability to be a hero". What is the problem with this? First of all, Neo was an adult in the movies, had parents, and was not an outcast. Eragon was not an outcast, but a Luke Skywalker ripoff. Jubilee, while being a mutant, was loved by her parents. And Harry Potter was only an outcast with his aunt and uncle--the rest of the school loved him! He then tries to link all four with these tropes that they follow, but anyone with a passing knowledge of the source material would point out how wrong he was. Probably the only one he got right with anything was... none. He even tried to pull the "They don't do cool things while everyone else gets to be awesome." In front of Neo, who made a guy explode from the inside. That is 100% not true. But even ignoring all of that, and what puts this to second place of most hated reviews for me, was the constant smackdown of Harry Potter. I don't even read the books and haven't watched the movies in years, and the constant abuse pissed me off. It was like listening to a bad fanfic where he bashed his hated character. I know Doug constantly refused to put in any research, but this was the worst offender.

* SirPellucidar: What annoyed me about the Creator/FoxKids review was the segment he spent on ''WesternAnimation/GodzillaTheSeries''. He spent 90% of the time bashing the movie and stating that the series must have sucked because the movie did, all the while making it obvious that he had never actually watched the show. He gave a little nod at the end to how some Godzilla fans enjoyed the cartoon, but that was it. No mention of the fact that the show is universally considered better than the movie, and Zilla Jr. is considered by most fans to legitimately deserve the title of Godzilla, unlike his father from the movie.

** Alienhunter: I removed my earlier post about [[Recap/TheNostalgiaCriticS11E24 his review]] of CreatorFoxKids with the Toonami review. Starting off with an almost 10-minute skit of Critic being old and grumpy because he never really watched Toonami. Then the actual review starts off with Walter, Tamara, Heather, and Malcolm talking about each show for like two minutes. Now, this could still be cool to see with focusing on the history and the specials with Tom, but nope, instead, it focuses on random programs that don't really have much to do with Creator/{{Toonami}}. They would occasionally bring up anime like Anime/SailorMoon, Manga/OnePiece, and Anime/YuYuHakusho, but most of the review was based around on shows that were more played on Creator/CartoonNetwork, like WesternAnimation/TheBatman, WesternAnimation/JusticeLeague, WesternAnimation/ThePowerpuffGirls, WesternAnimation/Ben10AlienForce and... WesternAnimation/StarWarsTheCloneWars... What. Not helping with the Critic (y'know, the reason most people watch the show) randomly sprouting one-liners about whatever show they were talking about and mostly getting screamed at by Walter in the most unfunny way. And don't get me started on the stupid "joke" they did multiple times about them all laughing obnoxiously loudly for like a minute straight, it's not funny, it's loud and, well, obnoxious. Although, I do have to admit that the costume for live-action!Tom was amazing and the voice used for him was spot-on. But that's about it for the nice things that I have for this "review".

* Tropers/{{Samusforce}}: You know, I was nice during the ''TMNT'' reviews, ''Hocus Pocus'', and ''Eragon'', but [[Recap/TheNostalgiaCriticS12E22 his review]] for ''Percy Jackson and the Lighting Thief'' is without a doubt the worst one he has done! Let's ignore that he missed about a dozen and one joke opportunities. What really makes this horrible is the skit that plays during it. Calling it a "Wow, youngsters!" thing doesn't make sense in so many ways. OK, so we have Neo, Eragon, Jubilee, and Harry Potter together in a group. Why? Because they are all "outcasts who are chosen by a supernatural being to combat a threat, and what makes them an outcast gives them the ability to be a hero". What is the problem with this? First of all, Neo was an adult in the movies, had parents, and was not an outcast. Eragon was not an outcast, but a Luke Skywalker ripoff. Jubilee, while being a mutant, was loved by her parents. And Harry Potter was only an outcast with his aunt and uncle--the rest of the school loved him! He then tries to link all four with these tropes that they follow, but anyone with a passing knowledge of the source material would point out how wrong he was. Probably the only one he got right with anything was... none. He even tried to pull the "They don't do cool things while everyone else gets to be awesome." In front of Neo, who made a guy explode from the inside. That is 100% not true. But even ignoring all of that, and what puts this to second place of most hated reviews for me, was the constant smackdown of Harry Potter. I don't even read the books and haven't watched the movies in years, and the constant abuse pissed me off. It was like listening to a bad fanfic where he bashed his hated character. I know Doug constantly refused to put in any research, but this was the worst offender.

* Dark4ngel: Let me say this, yes, I do like ''Film/{{Maleficent}}'', but I do acknowledge it is very flawed and I know that everyone will have their reasons for not liking it. However, just watching a few clips of [[[[Recap/TheNostalgiaCriticS11E8 Doug's review]] made me wonder if he's either stupid or intentionally ignoring some things to try to make the movie look worse. Like, he says Stefan helps the king destroy the fairies, which is completely untrue. Stefan only hurt Maleficent and never did anything to the Moors afterwards. Then, during the scene where Stefan cuts off Maleficent's wings, he says "Good thing she's such a heavy sleeper" when the movie blatantly points out that he drugged her. Did he have to clean his glasses while watching that scene and he's just blind without them? Then he makes a joke during the scene that even haters of the movie agree is a very emotional scene (when she's crying over her wings): "I didn't even get to find out how they tasted." What. That's where I clicked off.

* Tropers/{{Samusforce}}: You know, I was nice during the ''TMNT'' reviews, ''Hocus Pocus'', and ''Eragon'', but [[Recap/TheNostalgiaCriticS12E22 his review]] for ''Percy Jackson and the Lighting Thief'' is without a doubt the worst one he has done! Let's ignore that he missed about a dozen and one joke opportunities. What really makes this horrible is the skit that plays during it. Calling it a "Wow, youngsters!" thing doesn't make sense in so many ways. OK, so we have Neo, Eragon, Jubilee, and Harry Potter together in a group. Why? Because they are all "outcasts who are chosen by a supernatural being to combat a threat, and what makes them an outcast gives them the ability to be a hero". What is the problem with this? First of all, Neo was an adult in the movies, had parents, and was not an outcast. Eragon was not an outcast, but a Luke Skywalker ripoff. Jubilee, while being a mutant, was loved by her parents. And Harry Potter was only an outcast with his aunt and uncle--the rest of the school loved him! He then tries to link all four with these tropes that they follow, but anyone with a passing knowledge of the source material would point out how wrong he was. Probably the only one he got right with anything was... none. He even tried to pull the "They don't do cool things while everyone else gets to be awesome." In front of Neo, who made a guy explode from the inside. That is 100% not true. But even ignoring all of that, and what puts this to second place of most hated reviews for me, was the constant smackdown of Harry Potter. I don't even read the books and haven't watched the movies in years, and the constant abuse pissed me off. It was like listening to a bad fanfic where he bashed his hated character. I know Doug constantly refused to put in any research, but this was the worst offender.

** Alienhunter: I removed my earlier post about his Fox Kids review with the Toonami review. Starting off with an almost 10-minute skit of Critic being old and grumpy because he never really watched Toonami. Then the actual review starts off with Walter, Tamara, Heather, and Malcolm talking about each show for like two minutes. Now, this could still be cool to see with focusing on the history and the specials with Tom, but nope, instead, it focuses on random programs that don't really have much to do with Creator/{{Toonami}}. They would occasionally bring up anime like Anime/SailorMoon, Manga/OnePiece, and Anime/YuYuHakusho, but most of the review was based around on shows that were more played on Creator/CartoonNetwork, like WesternAnimation/TheBatman, WesternAnimation/JusticeLeague, WesternAnimation/ThePowerpuffGirls, WesternAnimation/Ben10AlienForce and... WesternAnimation/StarWarsTheCloneWars... What. Not helping with the Critic (y'know, the reason most people watch the show) randomly sprouting one-liners about whatever show they were talking about and mostly getting screamed at by Walter in the most unfunny way. And don't get me started on the stupid "joke" they did multiple times about them all laughing obnoxiously loudly for like a minute straight, it's not funny, it's loud and, well, obnoxious. Although, I do have to admit that the costume for live-action!Tom was amazing and the voice used for him was spot-on. But that's about it for the nice things that I have for this "review".

* Tropers/{{Samusforce}}: You know, I was nice during the ''TMNT'' reviews, ''Hocus Pocus'', and ''Eragon'', but [[Recap/TheNostalgiaCriticS12E22 his review]] for ''Percy Jackson and the Lighting Thief'' is without a doubt the worst one he has done! Let's ignore that he missed about a dozen and one joke opportunities. What really makes this horrible is the skit that plays during it. Calling it a "Wow, youngsters!" thing doesn't make sense in so many ways. OK, so we have Neo, Eragon, Jubilee, and Harry Potter together in a group. Why? Because they are all "outcasts who are chosen by a supernatural being to combat a threat, and what makes them an outcast gives them the ability to be a hero". What is the problem with this? First of all, Neo was an adult in the movies, had parents, and was not an outcast. Eragon was not an outcast, but a Luke Skywalker ripoff. Jubilee, while being a mutant, was loved by her parents. And Harry Potter was only an outcast with his aunt and uncle--the rest of the school loved him! He then tries to link all four with these tropes that they follow, but anyone with a passing knowledge of the source material would point out how wrong he was. Probably the only one he got right with anything was... none. He even tried to pull the "They don't do cool things while everyone else gets to be awesome." In front of Neo, who made a guy explode from the inside. That is 100% not true. But even ignoring all of that, and what puts this to second place of most hated reviews for me, was the constant smackdown of Harry Potter. I don't even read the books and haven't watched the movies in years, and the constant abuse pissed me off. It was like listening to a bad fanfic where he bashed his hated character. I know Doug constantly refused to put in any research, but this was the worst offender.

* Tropers/{{PutYaGunsOn}}: While I'm not necessarily offended at any of the Critic's race-related humor, this one just felt cheap and thrown in there. But that pales in comparison to his cringeworthy joke about Creator/PatMorita as Santa in ''Film/BabesInToyland''. All I [[Recap/TheNostalgiaCriticS4E46 his review]] could see was "lol let's call him [[JapaneseRanguage Santa Craus]] and name the reindeer after Chinese food lol cus he's um...Asian". I don't feel attacked by his jokes at all, it's more about annoyance at the fact that his Asian-related humor at the time hadn't really evolved much past "14-year-old who thinks it's funny to call [[RacialFaceBlindness all Asian people]] Creator/JackieChan". His recent Yogi Bear review (released ''years'' after these reviews) certainly doesn't help his case. [[superscript:(As Yogi and Boo Boo drag a train of picnic tables with a dog on it) "We're eating the dog too! Korean food tonight!"]] While I don't think Doug is necessarily a racist or hateful towards East Asians, I'm convinced he still sees us as socially acceptable targets for a cheap laugh.

* Scsigs: Since people have stated good points about my other picks, ''Film/HocusPocus'' and the HypeBacklash video, I'll bring up [[Recap/TheNostalgiaCriticEditorial78 his video]] about whitewashing. I get why he wanted to make the video. It was a hot button issue, especially in 2016 where ''everything'' was for little to no reason, depending on what you're talking about. However, his major talking points included live action people playing roles originally meant for people of other ethnicities or physical statures, roles played by people from other countries, and voice acting in both western animation and anime dubbing. First, the Critic is on the more liberal side of this argument, with saying various things about these topics, but succumbs to not really making any good points about them, with Critical Research Failure, [[DoubleStandard double standards]], and just a plain old failure to use common sense abound. He talks about whitewashing by bringing up ''Film/GhostInTheShell2017'' with casting Creator/ScarlettJohansson as the Major. I can understand this criticism, since it's a film based on a Japanese anime film and its setting is still uniquely Japanese with Asian actors in most of the other roles, but he then praises films that RaceLift white characters. {{Double Standard}}s much? Then he brings up Creator/HenryCavill and Creator/AndrewGarfield playing Superman and Spider-Man, with them both being British (although Garfield was born in America) as disqualifiers for playing these roles. What? Ethnicity and race are 2 completely different things. He then talks about ''Film/TheLordOfTheRings'' casting regular actors over little people except for back shots in some scenes in the roles of the Hobbits. What? Hobbits aren't little people, they're fully grown people that just happen to be smaller than other races. Casting regular people and using either camera tricks, green-screening, or CGI was their best bet at portraying the world most accurately to the books. That argument makes no sense. Then, he also touches upon actors of other races voicing characters in animated works, including anime dubs, that aren't Japanese or whatever race or even gender or age of their characters. First of all, there ''are'' Asian actors working in the anime dubbing industry. Second, the acting pool for anime dubs, unless paid for by a larger company, is rather low, due to usually requiring non-union actors who'll accept the lower pay than union and prelay work, which is why we don't see many high-profile actors who'll slum for less money to do dub work that often. So, it makes sense to use not just Asian actors, who aren't probably going to settle for dubbing work anyways. Also, not every anime is set in Japan. There are several shows and films, Studio Ghibli's in particular, that are set more in worlds of multiple cultures, or just Germanic worlds, so that shouldn't matter anyways. Second, using adults to voice kids ''is'' an industry standard and the norm. It's done to maintain consistency in the characters' voices as long as possible if they don't change in any way, especially if a series goes on for multiple years where a kid's voice would break eventually, so it's a JustifiedTrope. However, there ''have'' been [[SubvertedTrope subversions]] of this in some productions. Third, not every child actor is going to be able to give the most believable performance out there. With how many films he's reviewed as the NC, you'd think he'd remember that. Fourth, anime dubbing is not the same as prelay. It's even challenging for experienced voice actors to do because they have to adapt to a completely different style of voice acting. Most kid actors can't act that well already, so they'd be pretty lost on what to do, though there certainly ''have'' been a few subversions here, like Aaron Dismuke as Al in ''Anime/FullmetalAlchemist2003,'' since he didn't have any mouthflaps to act against, and Daveigh Chase as Chihiro in ''Anime/SpiritedAway'', but they are outliers in this case. This topic is heavily debated everywhere and Doug's serious mishandling of this situation isn't helping matters so much as it confuses them, which is why I don't like this video. You can clearly see why.

* Tropers/{{Samusforce}}: You know, I was nice during the ''TMNT'' reviews, ''Hocus Pocus'', and ''Eragon'', but his latest review for ''Percy Jackson and the Lighting Thief'' is without a doubt the worst one he has done! Let's ignore that he missed about a dozen and one joke opportunities. What really makes this horrible is the skit that plays during it. Calling it a "Wow, youngsters!" thing doesn't make sense in so many ways. OK, so we have Neo, Eragon, Jubilee, and Harry Potter together in a group. Why? Because they are all "outcasts who are chosen by a supernatural being to combat a threat, and what makes them an outcast gives them the ability to be a hero". What is the problem with this? First of all, Neo was an adult in the movies, had parents, and was not an outcast. Eragon was not an outcast, but a Luke Skywalker ripoff. Jubilee, while being a mutant, was loved by her parents. And Harry Potter was only an outcast with his aunt and uncle--the rest of the school loved him! He then tries to link all four with these tropes that they follow, but anyone with a passing knowledge of the source material would point out how wrong he was. Probably the only one he got right with anything was... none. He even tried to pull the "They don't do cool things while everyone else gets to be awesome." In front of Neo, who made a guy explode from the inside. That is 100% not true. But even ignoring all of that, and what puts this to second place of most hated reviews for me, was the constant smackdown of Harry Potter. I don't even read the books and haven't watched the movies in years, and the constant abuse pissed me off. It was like listening to a bad fanfic where he bashed his hated character. I know Doug constantly refused to put in any research, but this was the worst offender.

* cartoonfanman: I pretty much gave up watching Nostalgia Critic after he uploaded a [[OverlyLongGag one hour]] [[Recap/TheNostalgiaCriticS10E22 review]] of ''Film/ManOfSteel'', but somebody showed me a scene at the beginning of his ''Film/It2017'' review that made me legit rage. It starts with [[TheScrappy Hyper Fangirl]] introducing the review, and when the audience starts to boo her, she pulls out a huge machine gun and shoots the audience. Not only is it yet another unfunny and tasteless joke, but the fact that this was uploaded 1 week exactly after the Las Vegas shooting made this scene way more uncomfortable to watch. I'm usually apathetic when it comes to Nostalgia Critic but this moment alone [[StealthPun killed]] any shred of respect or optimism I had for the Critic in the first place.

* cartoonfanman: I pretty much gave up watching Nostalgia Critic after he uploaded a [[OverlyLongGag one hour]] [[[[Recap/TheNostalgiaCriticS6E21 review]] of ''Film/ManOfSteel'', but somebody showed me a scene at the beginning of his ''Film/It2017'' review that made me legit rage. It starts with [[TheScrappy Hyper Fangirl]] introducing the review, and when the audience starts to boo her, she pulls out a huge machine gun and shoots the audience. Not only is it yet another unfunny and tasteless joke, but the fact that this was uploaded 1 week exactly after the Las Vegas shooting made this scene way more uncomfortable to watch. I'm usually apathetic when it comes to Nostalgia Critic but this moment alone [[StealthPun killed]] any shred of respect or optimism I had for the Critic in the first place.

* Tropers/{{DeMac}}: I used to like the Nostalgia Critic alright, but his complaining about kids' cartoons got to be really ridiculous as time went on. One specific example I remember is when [[Recap/TheNostalgiaCriticS1E39 he reviews]] ''Series/TheSuperMarioBrosSuperShow'' and starts complaining about the ''Film/MadMax'' parody. In the skit, the oil tanker that everyone is fighting over has been replaced with a tanker full of pasta sauce. Doug doesn't complain that it's unfunny, or anything like that. He complains that it makes no sense for people to fight over pasta sauce, as though a kiddie parody of an 80's action franchise is supposed to be well-plotted and perfectly logical. After that, it was hard for me to see Doug's reviews as anything but absurd nitpicking over low-hanging fruits.

* Tropers/CaptainTedium: I lost any interest in seeing any of the Nostalgia Critic's videos when I saw the thumbnail for his review of ''WesternAnimation/FelixTheCatTheMovie''. I know that that particular animated film wasn't very successful and that it's anyone's right to say what they want about the movie, but the image of the Nostalgia Critic grinning maliciously while handing Felix his magic bag of tricks after shitting in it was just so tasteless and juvenile. I do not take people seriously if their way of dealing with works of fiction they don't like is by making pictures of themselves befouling the belongings of characters from the work they despise. It's the lowest form of ToiletHumour imaginable.

* Nightfurywitch: I used to LOVE Doug's older reviews as a kid, but even back then there was one joke in [[Recap/TheNostalgiaCriticS3E36 his review]] of ''WesternAnimation/PoundPuppiesAndTheLegendOfBigPaw'' that I always found a bit too mean. He closes out the review by saying next time you see a sweet, innocent puppy in the shelter, you should "let it rot" (his words, not mine) so we don't get more bad movies like this. As someone who loves animals, I felt this joke was way too harsh and out of left field for what seemed to be just a bland inoffensive 80's cartoon.
* CodaFett: I'll admit, I've not been a fan of NC for a long time but even when I was his review of '''WesternAnimation/{{TMNT}}''' just rubbed me wrong. To be as brief as possible, the biggest problem is definitely the fact that it's not really a review, even in the loose sense that was popularized by this very show. It's 10 minutes of Critic being frustrated and confused because this incarnation of the turtles is different than what he grew up with and was used too. That is ''not'' a fault of the movie and it's very clearly meant to be an indirect sequel to the much more recent 2003 series than the 1980s original or the live action versions. It's particularly noticeable with scenes of the character [[DarkActionGirl Karai]] and the faceoff with Raph and Leonardo where he stops his commentary to rant. That's not even getting into that incredibly tasteless and kinda racist rib on the voice of beloved actor Mako, which he later apologized for. I think it's mostly a bit on his part, but it stops being funny rather quickly because it makes it seem like Critic legitimately doesn't have anything bad to say about the movie and has to pad out the video.

* @/Dvaderstarlord5: I used to be a fan of the Critic but an issue that I had with him back when I was a fan that has gotten stronger is his [[Recap/TheNostalgiaCriticS7E3 Old vs. New]] on the ''Franchise/SpiderMan'' movies. Now this isn't that he said that the Creator/AndrewGarfield movies are better than Creator/TobeyMaguire's, though I disagree on that front, I mean of the 3 live-action Spider-Men, I think Creator/TomHolland is the best so this is isn't a bitter fanboy. But the issue that I have is when he declares that Garfield is better as Spider-Man by connecting the times in both movie series where they hang up the cowl in ''Film/SpiderMan2'' and ''Film/TheAmazingSpiderMan2'' respectively where he says that Garfield has the edge because he has a more sympathetic reason for the hangup as Gwen died and he was grieving whereas with Maguire, it was the just the stress of the job and that it got hard for him. That stuck with me. The first half of ''Spider-Man 2'' is entirely dedicated to showing just how much Peter's life sucks so that it feels earned and believable when Peter temporarily gives up being Spider-Man. In the first half of the movie, Peter gets fired, is late for his classes at college, is constantly insulted and demeaned at the job that he does have, is living in poverty, with a jerk landlord, watches as a new friend of his becomes a supervillain, his relationship with his best friend is slowly falling apart, the woman he loves moves on and gets engaged to someone else and he can't do anything about it because he believes its the right thing to stay away from her for her safety, his aunt is also in poverty, and to top it off, his powers are failing for no reason that he can discern and as such it is now an even bigger risk to his life to fight crime. That is a far thing from simply life getting hard. So yeah, I really didn't like how that got ignored so that he could say that the Andrew Garfield stuff was better. I mean if that's your opinion, fine but give some actual fact.
* Tropers/{{Michaelsar}}: One moment that always rubbed me the wrong way was the ending of the review of ''WesternAnimation/TheSwanPrincess''. Basically, after spending the entire episode calling the film "Diet [[Franchise/DisneyAnimatedCanon Disney]]", the Nostalgia Critic is shown a bottle of soda called "Diet Creator/{{DreamWorks|Animation}}", which features ''WesternAnimation/TheNutJob'', the ''WesternAnimation/IceAge'' movies, and the ''WesternAnimation/{{Rio}}'' movies. He then points out that this is the second review in a row where he's [[TakeThat insulted]] Creator/BlueSkyStudios [[note]]The otherwise pretty funny ''WesternAnimation/{{Foodfight}}'' review also had a pretty harsh TakeThat towards the company[[/note]]...and then continues to do it, claiming that he should stop if they ever make something good. Then he's shown a bottle of "Diet Creator/{{Pixar}}", which features ''WesternAnimation/Cars2'' and ''WesternAnimation/MonstersUniversity'', basically just a joke about Pixar not making good movies anymore (in his opinion, anyway). We get it, Doug, you hate Pixar and Blue Sky Studios. This joke was not funny, it was just needlessly harsh.

* Troper/{{libertydude}}: My Dethroning Moment comes [[Recap/TheNostalgiaCriticS8E19from his review]] of ''Film/MadMaxFuryRoad'', simply because of how it showed the absolute worst aspects of modern NC: [[AuthorFilibuster Shoehorned political and social messages]], the frequent use of [[{{Strawman}} Strawmen]], and [[OverlyLongGag an overreliance on skits]] instead of criticism. The first two complaints are the worst parts, as the Critic dividing the film's [[StrawFeminist supporters]] and [[StrawMisogynist detractors]] into two [[{{Flanderization}} Flanderized]] groups just makes him seem lazy. Here he is, in the unique position of finding a [[BrokenBase base-breaking]] film SoOkayItsAverage, which could allow him to really delve into specific aspects of the movie that do and don't work. [[TheyWastedAPerfectlyGoodPlot Instead, he focuses more on the reactions of viewers]], and he doesn't even do it very fairly. While the supporters of the film are portrayed as liking the film [[EstrogenBrigade for shallow reasons]], the detractors are portrayed far worse, being [[NerdsAreVirgins sexless nerds]] angry that there was a badass ActionGirl in the movie. Aside from the fact that there are plenty of other reasons to criticize the film ([[SpotlightStealingSquad the lack of focus on Max himself]], [[ExcusePlot the spectacle overcoming the story]] etc.), this really ignores the fact that there have been plenty of female action heroes that men enjoy (i.e. [[Franchise/TombRaider Lara Croft]], Franchise/WonderWoman, [[Franchise/GhostInTheShell Motoko Kusanagi]], just to name a few). It just felt like Doug was really trying to invalidate negative criticism of the film by portraying the criticizers as worse as possible. It doesn't help that most of his attempted "criticisms" against the film feel really loose and shallow, just so Tamara can easily knock them down and validate approval of the film. It's this dismissive and misleading attitude that really makes this episode the worst for me personally.

* Scsigs: Since people have stated good points about my other picks, ''Film/HocusPocus'' and the HypeBacklash video, I'll bring up his video about whitewashing. I get why he wanted to make the video. It was a hot button issue, especially in 2016 where ''everything'' was for little to no reason, depending on what you're talking about. However, his major talking points included live action people playing roles originally meant for people of other ethnicities or physical statures, roles played by people from other countries, and voice acting in both western animation and anime dubbing. First, the Critic is on the more liberal side of this argument, with saying various things about these topics, but succumbs to not really making any good points about them, with Critical Research Failure, [[DoubleStandard double standards]], and just a plain old failure to use common sense abound. He talks about whitewashing by bringing up ''Film/GhostInTheShell2017'' with casting Creator/ScarlettJohansson as the Major. I can understand this criticism, since it's a film based on a Japanese anime film and its setting is still uniquely Japanese with Asian actors in most of the other roles, but he then praises films that RaceLift white characters. {{Double Standard}}s much? Then he brings up Creator/HenryCavill and Creator/AndrewGarfield playing Superman and Spider-Man, with them both being British (although Garfield was born in America) as disqualifiers for playing these roles. What? Ethnicity and race are 2 completely different things. He then talks about ''Film/TheLordOfTheRings'' casting regular actors over little people except for back shots in some scenes in the roles of the Hobbits. What? Hobbits aren't little people, they're fully grown people that just happen to be smaller than other races. Casting regular people and using either camera tricks, green-screening, or CGI was their best bet at portraying the world most accurately to the books. That argument makes no sense. Then, he also touches upon actors of other races voicing characters in animated works, including anime dubs, that aren't Japanese or whatever race or even gender or age of their characters. First of all, there ''are'' Asian actors working in the anime dubbing industry. Second, the acting pool for anime dubs, unless paid for by a larger company, is rather low, due to usually requiring non-union actors who'll accept the lower pay than union and prelay work, which is why we don't see many high-profile actors who'll slum for less money to do dub work that often. So, it makes sense to use not just Asian actors, who aren't probably going to settle for dubbing work anyways. Also, not every anime is set in Japan. There are several shows and films, Studio Ghibli's in particular, that are set more in worlds of multiple cultures, or just Germanic worlds, so that shouldn't matter anyways. Second, using adults to voice kids ''is'' an industry standard and the norm. It's done to maintain consistency in the characters' voices as long as possible if they don't change in any way, especially if a series goes on for multiple years where a kid's voice would break eventually, so it's a JustifiedTrope. However, there ''have'' been [[SubvertedTrope subversions]] of this in some productions. Third, not every child actor is going to be able to give the most believable performance out there. With how many films he's reviewed as the NC, you'd think he'd remember that. Fourth, anime dubbing is not the same as prelay. It's even challenging for experienced voice actors to do because they have to adapt to a completely different style of voice acting. Most kid actors can't act that well already, so they'd be pretty lost on what to do, though there certainly ''have'' been a few subversions here, like Aaron Dismuke as Al in ''Anime/FullmetalAlchemist2003,'' since he didn't have any mouthflaps to act against, and Daveigh Chase as Chihiro in ''Anime/SpiritedAway'', but they are outliers in this case. This topic is heavily debated everywhere and Doug's serious mishandling of this situation isn't helping matters so much as it confuses them, which is why I don't like this video. You can clearly see why.

* Tropers/SpaceProtagonist: Okay, so I'm a huge fan of the Nostalgia Critic and often take notes on anything I find useful, but I did notice something from [[Recap/TheNostalgiaCriticS8E15 his review]] of ''Film/OsmosisJones''. Doug was doing various comparisons to ''WesternAnimation/InsideOut'' since both films had a "secret world inside the human brain" plot. Although I did kind of enjoy the Inside Out-parody segments, but I do have a minor complaint to make. Nostalgia Critic's Joy was the one who made most of the complaints about the movie, wouldn't it make more sense if his Disgust was the one doing the criticism? I mean criticism is literally her job and personality! I get that Joy was the main lead in the film, but she's meant to look on the bright side of situations and her being this negative was pretty out-of-character for her. [[TheyWastedAPerfectlyGoodPlot Maybe Disgust and Joy could have had a rivalry or a battle to see who could find more upsides or downsides to the film, and then report back to Osmosis about it. This feels like a wasted opportunity.]]

* Tropers/T-Troper24: For me, it's been his lack of acknowledgement towards [[WesternAnimation/TeenageMutantNinjaTurtles2003 the two cartoons that came]] [[WesternAnimation/TeenageMutantNinjaTurtles2012 after the 80's one ended]]. I remember the first time watching the review for ''Out of the Shadows''. The thing that ticked me off were the two instances where he began asking if either Leo or Shredder ever had a moment where he wasn't a dickhead leader, or doesn't go out like an ass in respective order. I saw a comment saying the following thing. 1) Leo not being an asshole leader in the 2003 series. 2) Shredder not going out like a bitch in the 2003 series. 3) Captures everything Turtles and takes itself seriously in the 2003 series. Even the 2012 series gets this right, but nope, he just shows instances of both Leo and Shredder in such moments just to prove his point. Seriously, both of these shows are or more or less should be vlog worthy and yet, there he is, exclusively binge watching both ''WesternAnimation/AdventureTime'' and ''WesternAnimation/StevenUniverse''. Correct me if I'm wrong but I watched that April fools vlog on Website/YouTube where he jokingly talked about the first episode of ''WesternAnimation/MyLittlePonyFriendshipIsMagic'' with some other dude on a couch. I recall reading a comment saying that he won't look at the show because it's not his thing. Fair enough, I'm neutral over the show myself; however, in that same comment thread, someone in a response said that he said the exact same thing about Adventure Time and yet he's still making vlogs for it. Okay, let me ask a very legit question. what on Earth does he plan on looking at once both of those shows end? One of which from what I hear is ending next year. And yet, he barely even references either of the two TMNT cartoons that are amazing in their own right: one is faithful to the comics that started the whole franchise and the other tells its own story how it wants. But nope, he's all "Eh, TMNT never makes Leo a good leader, nor does it make Shredder a badass". I'm not trying to say he has to look at those two shows. But some form of acknowledgement would be much appreciated.
* [=CutieTabootie=]: I'm an ex-fan of Nostalgia Critic who stopped watching after #[=ChangeTheChannel=] was released. And looking back, I just find more issues I have with his videos. But even when I was a fan, there were plenty of reviews and moments I had problems with, most of them already covered here (like the ''Sailor Moon'' video). One thing that always made me really upset was when he was making fun of Music/BritneySpears's breakdown in 2007 during his review of ''Alvin and the Chipmunks: The Squeakuel'', relating to it being mentioned in the film that the Chipettes were to open for Britney Spears. Considering everything she went through at the time (and even what she's still going through now with her conservatorship), I found it extremely mean spirited and tasteless. Every joke made at Britney's expense regarding her breakdown has been tasteless, but still doing it years after it happened was just a new kind of low and just thinking about it makes me cringe.
* [=TCgamerboy2002=]: Before I start, I would like to say that ''WesternAnimation/{{Balto}}'' is one of my favorite animated movies. The Critic reviewed the movie, but didn't tear it apart as harshly since he sees why people like it, but still makes fun of it like with most good movies he reviewed. That usually doesn't bother me as that's his job. My complaint mostly comes from two particular parts: The first was the part with the scene with the white wolf which, I might add, was a very important part of the movie. He apparently had no idea what that scene was about and thought he gave Balto powers because of a later scene (which is obviously a joke, but still). It rubs me the wrong way because he failed to realize that that scene represented Balto accepting his wolf side, which he initially resented because it made him an outcast in the first place. He didn't use his sense of smell at first to get back because he was avoiding said wolf side. What Boris said about a dog not being able to make it alone but a wolf can was a plot point building up to this moment. Another part was that he didn't finish his review. Instead, he points out the historical inaccuracies in the movie and ended the review with a [[IncrediblyLamePun frameskit]].[[note]]Which involves Tamara as the recurring smoker mother telling a story about the review to another character she plays that wraps around the video.[[/note]] This is the same problem I have with his review of ''Film/HomeAlone3'' as he gives us no final thoughts about the movie. Because of this, I don't know if he likes the movie or not. Granted, these parts don't turn me off of the review, but they're very hard to ignore.
* [=Asue=]: I really didn't find the forced "''WesternAnimation/TheSimpsons'' has jumped the shark" joke funny in his review of ''Film/{{Monkeybone}}''. First of all, it's clearly {{Padding}}, as the "joke" is stretched for almost a minute (with nothing funny happening during it) and it has barely anything to do with the review. Second, like with his "Top 11 Simpsons Episodes" episode, he's pushing his opinion on people who either don't even care about the show and those who keep watching it. And third, he said he stopped watching it after Season 7, yet "[[Recap/TheSimpsonsS8E23HomersEnemy Homer's Enemy]]" was on the list of the previously mentioned NC episode. The hell, Critic?
* Tropers/CheerfulOptimistic: I stopped watching Nostalgia Critic (and most Channel Awesome reviewers, prior to finding out about #[=ChangeTheChannel=]) after his ''Film/{{Labyrinth}}'' review. After a clip includes fairies, NC made a joke about gay pride. This wasn't a case of making fun of a marginalized group back when bigoted jokes weren't really seen as a problem, he should have known full well that this was homoantagonistic and not OK.
* cartoonfanman: I pretty much gave up watching Nostalgia Critic after he uploaded a [[OverlyLongGag one hour]] review of ''Film/ManOfSteel'', but somebody showed me a scene at the beginning of his ''Film/It2017'' review that made me legit rage. It starts with [[TheScrappy Hyper Fangirl]] introducing the review, and when the audience starts to boo her, she pulls out a huge machine gun and shoots the audience. Not only is it yet another unfunny and tasteless joke, but the fact that this was uploaded 1 week exactly after the Las Vegas shooting made this scene way more uncomfortable to watch. I'm usually apathetic when it comes to Nostalgia Critic but this moment alone [[StealthPun killed]] any shred of respect or optimism I had for the Critic in the first place.
* Retloclive: His review for ''Film/TheMummy1999'' that starred Creator/BrendanFraser. I didn't outright hate anything, or find anything offensive about the video, but I was left in a state of major confusion as to what the Nostalgia Critic was going for regarding the way Ardeth Bay speaks. I can only imagine that the Critic was trying to get across that Ardeth's speech pauses after every line can come off as awkward to sit through, but his joke that every line should have ended with "man." or "you know?" just felt like he was really reaching at some sort of criticism here. I truly don't get what the point of it was.
* Troper/{{emeriin}}: I personally couldn't deal with the "Canada's commercials are fucked up" RunningGag in the reboot commercial episodes. At least, "men don't know when they're getting harassed" wasn't mentioned again and was proved complete bull by Doug talking about being harassed in real life, but he kept acting like Canada are full of killjoys by telling us that 1 in 2 girls are abused. Thankfully, after a load of rape whistles himself, he seems to have stopped, but it still stings as a victim.

* Dark4ngel: Let me say this, yes, I do like ''Film/{{Maleficent}}'', but I do acknowledge it is very flawed and I know that everyone will have their reasons for not liking it. However, just watching a few clips of Doug's review made me wonder if he's either stupid or intentionally ignoring some things to try to make the movie look worse. Like, he says Stefan helps the king destroy the fairies, which is completely untrue. Stefan only hurt Maleficent and never did anything to the Moors afterwards. Then, during the scene where Stefan cuts off Maleficent's wings, he says "Good thing she's such a heavy sleeper" when the movie blatantly points out that he drugged her. Did he have to clean his glasses while watching that scene and he's just blind without them? Then he makes a joke during the scene that even haters of the movie agree is a very emotional scene (when she's crying over her wings): "I didn't even get to find out how they tasted." What. That's where I clicked off.
* ''Film/TheJungleBook2016'':

* ''Film/Deadpool2'':

* Toonami

* TT454: The Critic has made plenty of videos about divisive films in the past. Sometimes his reviews are balanced and incorporate both sides of the argument, but other times he picks a side and deliberately twists the truth to present his own arguments as irrefutable. And in my opinion, his review of ''Film/StarWarsTheRiseOfSkywalker'' stands as perhaps his most deliberately biased review yet. The review shamelessly panders to the film's haters throughout by making the entire plot of the film look like a soulless Creator/MichaelBay-level farce while stereotyping the characters as bumbling idiots. Worse, he decides to make the film's fans look bad by caricaturing them as complaining, bitter nerds who love the prequels and hate ''The Last Jedi''. Now, ''The Rise of Skywalker'' is far from perfect and has received a lot of criticism for its excessive fan service (even the people who like the movie can't ignore its negative qualities), but to outright lie about what happens in the film, skip over important plot points and argue that Creator/JJAbrams created it purely to please ''The Last Jedi'' haters is extremely unfair. There are plenty of ''Star Wars'' fans who enjoy all three sequels, but this review refuses to acknowledge them and instead resorts to nasty stereotypes. And if that's not bad enough, he also has the titular character of ''Series/TheMandalorian'' in it throughout to make snarky comments about how much of an unwatchable mess he thinks the plot is compared to his show, even though that most fans of ''The Mandalorian'' know that it's also far from perfect and has its own flaws and a lot of fan service too. Furthermore, the "moral" of the review is to move on from the sequel trilogy and just watch ''The Mandalorian'' instead because it's just so good and unites fans rather than divides them. But the review itself is clearly designed to exacerbate the division, so this moral is incredibly hypocritical. The Critic does defend the film a little bit in the review and makes it clear at the end that he doesn't hate it ''entirely'', but the review itself makes the movie look much, much worse than it actually is.
* Princesstwilight23: I stopped watching NC because I noticed his pattern. He's overly critical: "Oh, yeah, this was okay, but why didn't they do this?" And he does that all the time, especially with passable remakes. Like the ''Film/MaryPoppins'' review. I didn't like the sequel by any means, but my God, I hated how he had one of those power actors he hired to play: what I'm assuming is some Pennywise, Stephen King-styled version of Mary Poppins. It was amazingly unfunny and somewhat insulting. We get it, Critic, you love suffering as humor, but here's the thing: it was not funny! At all. You just did this to praise the original! "Oh, well, back in my day she was this way!"
* [=K00L4=]: While I consider myself a fan of Doug's work, I wasn't too big on his review of ''WesternAnimation/TheLionKing2019''. Now, while there were certainly good moments, the bad outweighed the good. For one thing, he nitpicks about very minor things. The Lions talking is the best example. Doug, just because a single aspect is unrealistic in an overall realistic movie doesn't automatically make the movie godawful. The nail in the coffin is that he disrespects the opinions of people who liked the movie. Seriously, Doug? I know that Critic is just an exaggeration of what Doug's true opinion is, but the entire video came out as pure unadulterated Narm. And not the good kind.

* CodaFett: I'll admit, I've not been a fan of NC for a long time but even when I was his review of ''WesternAnimation/TMNT'' just rubbed me wrong. To be as brief as possible, the biggest problem is definitely the fact that it's not really a review, even in the loose sense that was popularized by this very show. It's 10 minutes of Critic being frustrated and confused because this incarnation of the turtles is different than what he grew up with and was used too. That is ''not'' a fault of the movie and it's very clearly meant to be an indirect sequel to the much more recent 2003 series than the 1980s original or the live action versions. It's particularly noticeable with scenes of the character [[DarkActionGirl Karai]] and the faceoff with Raph and Leonardo where he stops his commentary to rant. That's not even getting into that incredibly tasteless and kinda racist rib on the voice of beloved actor Mako, which he later apologized for. I think it's mostly a bit on his part, but it stops being funny rather quickly because it makes it seem like Critic legitimately doesn't have anything bad to say about the movie and has to pad out the video.

** Tropers/StardustSoldier: I too would like to voice my displeasure over his "Grow a damn pair of balls!" comment. That's just an insenstitive thing to say at best and a downright cruel thing to say at worst.

* [[His review Recap/TheNostalgiaCriticS9E13]] of ''Film/ScoobyDooMonstersUnleashed'':

** EverM0re9117: My problem with this review is that the whole thing was just an excuse to bash it. He repeatedly throws Mowgli’s relationship with the wolves under the bus when the movie [[ShowDontTell shows us]] what we need to know rather than repeatedly tell us. Missing the point of Shere Khan’s motivation and blatantly ignoring the fact that the movie answers more than a few questions he asks. However, the final straw was his constant mockery about how this movie was supposed to be the "grown-up" or "adult version". The problem is ''no one'' called it that. Yes, it's a bit darker than the original film, but it’s nothing kids couldn’t handle (in general anyway) and it’s supposed to be an epic movie when compared to the ''[[WesternAnimation/TheJungleBook1967 1967 version]]''. But no one was calling it the "adult version". If there’s any recent adaptation of ''Literature/TheJungleBook'' that’s the "adult version", it’s likely the TruerToTheText, DarkerAndEdgier, PG-13 rated ''Film/{{Mowgli}}''. [[LighterAndSofter But not this movie]], Doug.

** Princesstwilight23: I hated the Deadpool review. Like it actually hurt my head. The worse part, bar none, his Rick and Morty segments. For someone who harped on how all Deadpool cosplayers are the same, he sure did a surface-level and unfunny version of Rick and poor Malcolm...poor, poor Malcolm did a very terrible version of Morty, but at least he had an excuse. Doug was just "This movie -brup- sucks and it stole from -burp- me." Then he ends his 'star quality' segment by showing his ass and doing a fake fart. There was nothing funny about it. Nothing clever. Nothing interesting. Again, for someone who spent an entire video saying all Deadpool cosplayers are just loud assholes (which they're not, someone on [=TikTok=] actually called him out on this) he sure doesn't seem to understand what Rick is like. Justin Roiland would probably be annoyed because he's seen this generic impersonation a hundred times. Actually, try to analyze the movie instead of saying it's a copy of something else. Because Doug seems to ignore he is basically a copy of every caustic critic before him. I hate how everyone in the comments was praising the performance, but if someone said it was bad they were bombarded by raging comments..

** tm465pole: Yea, the Toonami review was my breaking point too. Just the amount of non-research that went into the video stuck out like a sore thumb. No talking about the amazing promos or the various Toonami Immersion Events. No discussion about the Midnight Run or the eventual creation of Adult Swim. Barely talking about Gundam despite having six different series air on the block. Giving a ton of focus to Powerpuff Girls, which did air on the block, but never any premieres. But probably the biggest blunder was an entire segment dedicated to WesternAnimation/ThunderCats2011. Why? Because the episode was entirely dedicated to the pre-revival era of Toonami (a decision I was completely fine with, BTW), which ended in 2008. As you can guess by the Series title on this site, [=ThunderCats=] debuted ''three years after the block was cancelled''! The show eventually DID air on Toonami, but not until the Adult Swim revival, which the NC episode, as I said, decided not to cover. Oy.
* Tropers/{{Samusforce}}: You know, I was nice during the ''TMNT'' reviews, ''Hocus Pocus'', and ''Eragon'', but his latest review for ''Percy Jackson and the Lighting Thief'' is without a doubt the worst one he has done! Let's ignore that he missed about a dozen and one joke opportunities. What really makes this horrible is the skit that plays during it. Calling it a "Wow, youngsters!" thing doesn't make sense in so many ways. OK, so we have Neo, Eragon, Jubilee, and Harry Potter together in a group. Why? Because they are all "outcasts who are chosen by a supernatural being to combat a threat, and what makes them an outcast gives them the ability to be a hero". What is the problem with this? First of all, Neo was an adult in the movies, had parents, and was not an outcast. Eragon was not an outcast, but a Luke Skywalker ripoff. Jubilee, while being a mutant, was loved by her parents. And Harry Potter was only an outcast with his aunt and uncle--the rest of the school loved him! He then tries to link all four with these tropes that they follow, but anyone with a passing knowledge of the source material would point out how wrong he was. Probably the only one he got right with anything was... NONE. He even tried to pull the "They don't do cool things while everyone else gets to be awesome." In front of Neo, who made a guy explode from the inside. That is 100% not true. But even ignoring all of that, and what puts this to second place of most hated reviews for me, was the constant smackdown of Harry Potter. I don't even read the books and haven't watched the movies in years, and the constant abuse pissed me off. It was like listening to a bad fanfic where he bashed his hated character. I know Doug constantly refused to put in any research, but this was the worst offender.

** Tropers/{{Mariic}}: I originally hated his "Battle of the Commercials" video for his Critical Research Failure, but now, his ''Wall'' review, which is ''another'' clipless review, [[WaxingLyrical fills me with the urge to defecate]]. He completely missed the point of the film adaptation, not to mention completely ignored the context of when the original album was released. Not to mention his album for the review has some of the songs out of order.

** PeaceAndLove: On top of him needlessly shitting on one of the greatest movies ever made, during the video's "Another Brick in the Wall, Part 2" segment, Doug seems to think that the song is representative of the modern school system with the lyric "LOL so school sucks? Grow a damn pair of balls!". Uh, what? The education system in 1940s Britain was absolute hell, with teachers abusing the students and humiliating them under the guise of education, as Roger Waters himself can attest to. I mean, WOW. Way to miss the point, Doug. Also, while less offensive (but still stupid), he called "Goodbye Blue Sky" an OscarBait song, which... doesn't even BEGIN to make sense.

** [=SenorCornholio=]: A bit late to the party as I'd essentially stopped regularly checking out the Nostalgia Critic due to a multitude of reasons, but then I actually decided to check out his ''The Wall'' "review" and... well, it looks like he learned ''nothing'' from the ''Hocus Pocus'' video. Honestly, what is there to say? Immense lack of actual commentary, piss-poor jokes, [[ShallowParody a parody more shallow than a kiddie pool]], a ''severe'' lack of understanding of the source material, and generally having no point aside from being a [[BlatantLies "loving parody"]] of the original rock opera while, at the same time, requiring you to have watched the movie to even get any of his "jokes." But since this is about moments and not entire videos, I'm gonna have to go with... ah, I know! How about "Waiting for the Point"? Regardless of what the original number is meant to be portrayed as, I highly doubt that turning a hallucination about being a Neo-Nazi (ItMakesSenseInContext) into an internet flame war with the chant of "hashtag" is going to help this video's reception in the slightest. There's a difference between modernizing a movie to make sense in the present, and unintentionally dating it to the point where it's another relic of the times. At this point, it's clear that while the original ''The Wall'' will still be fondly remembered, this review and its album will ultimately fade into the sands of time where they belong.
* TT454: The Critic has made plenty of videos about divisive films in the past. Sometimes his reviews are balanced and incorporate both sides of the argument, but other times he picks a side and deliberately twists the truth to present his own arguments as irrefutable. And in my opinion, his review of ''Film/StarWarsTheRiseOfSkywalker'' stands as perhaps his most deliberately biased review yet. The review shamelessly panders to the film's haters throughout by making the entire plot of the film look like a soulless Creator/MichaelBay-level farce while stereotyping the characters as bumbling idiots. Worse, he decides to make the film's ''fans'' look bad by caricaturing them as complaining, bitter nerds who love the prequels and hate ''The Last Jedi''. Now, ''The Rise of Skywalker'' is far from perfect and has received a lot of criticism for its excessive fan service (even the people who like the movie can't ignore its negative qualities), but to outright lie about what happens in the film, skip over important plot points and argue that Creator/JJAbrams created it purely to please ''The Last Jedi'' haters is extremely unfair. There are plenty of ''Star Wars'' fans who enjoy all three sequels, but this review refuses to acknowledge them and instead resorts to nasty stereotypes. And if that's not bad enough, he also has the titular character of ''Series/TheMandalorian'' in it throughout to make snarky comments about how much of an unwatchable mess he thinks the plot is compared to ''his'' show, even though that most fans of ''The Mandalorian'' know that it's also far from perfect and has its own flaws and a lot of fan service too. Furthermore, the "moral" of the review is to move on from the sequel trilogy and just watch ''The Mandalorian'' instead because it's just so good and unites fans rather than divides them. But the review itself is clearly designed to exacerbate the division, so this moral is incredibly hypocritical. The Critic does defend the film a little bit in the review and makes it clear at the end that he doesn't hate it ''entirely'', but the review itself makes the movie look much, much worse than it actually is.

* ''Film/JurassicWorld'':

* Troper/{{libertydude}}: My Dethroning Moment comes from his ''Film/MadMaxFuryRoad'' review, simply because of how it showed the absolute worst aspects of modern NC: [[AuthorFilibuster Shoehorned political and social messages]], the frequent use of [[{{Strawman}} Strawmen]], and [[OverlyLongGag an overreliance on skits]] instead of criticism. The first two complaints are the worst parts, as the Critic dividing the film's [[StrawFeminist supporters]] and [[StrawMisogynist detractors]] into two [[{{Flanderization}} Flanderized]] groups just makes him seem lazy. Here he is, in the unique position of finding a [[BrokenBase base-breaking]] film SoOkayItsAverage, which could allow him to really delve into specific aspects of the movie that do and don't work. [[TheyWastedAPerfectlyGoodPlot Instead, he focuses more on the reactions of viewers]], and he doesn't even do it very fairly. While the supporters of the film are portrayed as liking the film [[EstrogenBrigade for shallow reasons]], the detractors are portrayed far worse, being [[NerdsAreVirgins sexless nerds]] angry that there was a badass ActionGirl in the movie. Aside from the fact that there are plenty of other reasons to criticize the film ([[SpotlightStealingSquad the lack of focus on Max himself]], [[ExcusePlot the spectacle overcoming the story]] etc.), this really ignores the fact that there have been plenty of female action heroes that men enjoy (i.e. [[Franchise/TombRaider Lara Croft]], Franchise/WonderWoman, [[Franchise/GhostInTheShell Motoko Kusanagi]], just to name a few). It just felt like Doug was really trying to invalidate negative criticism of the film by portraying the criticizers as worse as possible. It doesn't help that most of his attempted "criticisms" against the film feel really loose and shallow, just so Tamara can easily knock them down and validate approval of the film. It's this dismissive and misleading attitude that really makes this episode the worst for me personally.

* "Conquest of the Commercials":

* ''Film/ChristmasWithTheKranks'':

* Tropers/{{SafetySmash}}: I thought his review of ''Film/{{Blade}}'' was pretty good except for a joke he said at the end. When he showed shock that Blade and Karen don’t get together, he said “Quickly, Website/{{Tumblr}}, rewrite this ending so not only do they get together, but they have 20 children, all with different sexual identities; if 20 sexual identities don’t exist, make them up, you’re good at that.”. I have several problems with this. Why choose Tumblr to make fun of? Why not just fanfic writers in general? It really doesn’t make sense to mock Tumblr, especially because a lot of Tumblr users would love this ending. There are hundreds of posts with thousands of notes talking about how tired they are about forced love between men and women, and how surprised they are when a form of media let women and men be friends. Was the reason you singled out Tumblr to make fun of “made up sexual identities”? And what do you consider a “made up sexuality”? Do you consider Asexuality made up? Or Pansexuality? It didn’t ruin the review for me, but it seemed unnecessary and has some UnfortunateImplications.

* ''Film/ScoobyDooMonstersUnleashed'':

* jaredthedecimator: His ''Film/AlvinAndTheChipmunks'' video was the final straw for me. While most of the video is just bland, the reason it’s on here is because of the ending. In one of the cringiest things I have ever seen, Doug and two other guys that aren’t important take on these fans of the CGI chipmunks by singing an unfunny parody of a song from ''WesternAnimation/TheChipmunkMovie''. The scene where they are performing the song is probably the lowest point of the entire series. And you wanna know something funny? When Doug reviewed The Chipmunk Movie with WebVideo/TheNostalgiaChick a long time ago, he hated it. But in this video, he acts as if it’s a masterpiece of cinema. Make up your mind, Doug! If you want us to agree with your opinions, the least you can do is keep them consistent.
* Tropers/SpaceProtagonist: Okay, so I'm a huge fan of the Nostalgia Critic and often take notes on anything I find useful, but I did notice something from his ''Film/OsmosisJones'' video. Doug was doing various comparisons to ''WesternAnimation/InsideOut'' since both films had a "secret world inside the human brain" plot. Although I did kind of enjoy the Inside Out-parody segments, but I do have a minor complaint to make. Nostalgia Critic's Joy was the one who made most of the complaints about the movie, wouldn't it make more sense if his Disgust was the one doing the criticism? I mean criticism is literally her job and personality! I get that Joy was the main lead in the film, but she's meant to look on the bright side of situations and her being this negative was pretty out-of-character for her. [[TheyWastedAPerfectlyGoodPlot Maybe Disgust and Joy could have had a rivalry or a battle to see who could find more upsides or downsides to the film, and then report back to Osmosis about it. This feels like a wasted opportunity.]]
* Tropers/MightyMewtron: I love post-revival Critic, sketches and all, and I've been fine with Critic's clipless reviews- I really like his ''Pixels'' review, for example. But his ''Film/Ghostbusters2016'' review feels like a flop. He spends a ''lot'' of time on the controversy and he portrays ''every side'' as a strawman, including a StrawFeminist side, which looks tacky for a male reviewer to do and exaggerating everyone's actions makes it harder to deliver the message to the fanbase [[{{Hypocrite}} (sort of like the point he was trying to make in his]] ''[[WesternAnimation/TheLorax2012 Lorax]]'' review). He spends so much time on this plot that it's even ''harder'' to understand the clipless parts of the review, and he mostly just repeats the same couple of criticisms over and over again about the movie cutting clips too short and ruining funny moments with unfunny moments as well as misrepresenting the characters and ideas in the movie (such as portraying the final ghost as a cutesy cartoon from the logo when the point of the ghost was that [[spoiler:it was a terrifying rendition of that cutesy cartoon from the logo]]). If the sketches were entertaining, maybe this wouldn't be as bad a problem, but instead, he relies on an unoriginal "everyone on the Internet is being a jerk about this movie".
* ''Film/FreddyVsJason'':

* Tropers/{{LLSmoothJ}}: I usually like watching the Critic's reviews and I never thought I'd find myself adding a moment, but [[Recap/TheNostalgiaCriticS4E12 his review]] of ''Film/{{Airborne}}'' left a bitter taste in my mouth. Particularly his constant criticism of Mitchell [[WhatMeasureIsANonBadass for daring to avoid physical confrontation]]. [[SarcasmMode Because a real man always fights, no matter how more effective talking it out like civilized people could be.]]

* Tropers/Ryanruff13: "Looney Tunes Show: Good or Bad?" has a rather frustrating moment that almost felt like a parody, but the context makes it hard to use the "Nostalgia Critic is just a character" defense. I haven't really seen much of the ''WesternAnimation/TheLooneyTunesShow'', so I don't have an opinion on it, but one fairly infamous part of the review (if by "fairly infamous", I mean that it got an entry on the Wall Bangers page before Wall Banger pages were removed) was when he compares various previous spin-offs of ''Looney Tunes'' to the show, which just reeked of blatant cherry-picking to make the former look bad and the latter look hilarious (and he doesn't even succeed in doing the latter in my opinion). Especially confusing is how he tries to make the well-received ''WesternAnimation/DuckDodgers'' look bad. It's obviously his right to an opinion if he doesn't like ''Duck Dodgers'', but it really sours Doug's argument when he tries to use a bizarrely poor criticism of a popular show to try to support his argument, as well as trying to act like the other spin-offs were liked given their debatable status in actuality, and it's just one of the various moments that make Doug seem like a hipster.[[note]]Granted, I'll admit that in light of the recent Channel Awesome controversies, something as small as a weak defense of a cartoon is the least of anyone's problems.[[/note]]
* ''Franchise/SailorMoon'':

* ''WesternAnimation/EightCrazyNights'':

* Tropers/DLAbaoaqu: The review of ''Film/GhostRider2007'' when he first learns of Blackheart and gets a Bible to see if the movie is serious about the name. A verse was fabricated for the sake of a joke, but it came off as a middle finger to people who actually study it. Classy, Doug, considering that actual scholars have analyzed for decades and, when looked through linguistic and anthropological lenses, the "inconsistencies" (as you would term them) can be easily resolved. Also, way to go picking the low-hanging fruit.
* @/Dvaderstarlord5: I used to be a fan of the Critic but an issue that I had with him back when I was a fan that has gotten stronger is his Old vs. New on the ''Franchise/SpiderMan'' movies. Now this isn't that he said that the Creator/AndrewGarfield movies are better than Creator/TobeyMaguire's, though I disagree on that front, I mean of the 3 live-action Spider-Men, I think Creator/TomHolland is the best so this is isn't a bitter fanboy. But the issue that I have is when he declares that Garfield is better as Spider-Man by connecting the times in both movie series where they hang up the cowl in ''Film/SpiderMan2'' and ''Film/TheAmazingSpiderMan2'' respectively where he says that Garfield has the edge because he has a more sympathetic reason for the hangup as Gwen died and he was grieving whereas with Maguire, it was the just the stress of the job and that it got hard for him. That stuck with me. The first half of ''Spider-Man 2'' is entirely dedicated to showing just how much Peter's life sucks so that it feels earned and believable when Peter temporarily gives up being Spider-Man. In the first half of the movie, Peter gets fired, is late for his classes at college, is constantly insulted and demeaned at the job that he does have, is living in poverty, with a jerk landlord, watches as a new friend of his becomes a supervillain, his relationship with his best friend is slowly falling apart, the woman he loves moves on and gets engaged to someone else and he can't do anything about it because he believes its the right thing to stay away from her for her safety, his aunt is also in poverty, and to top it off, his powers are failing for no reason that he can discern and as such it is now an even bigger risk to his life to fight crime. That is a far thing from simply life getting hard. So yeah, I really didn't like how that got ignored so that he could say that the Andrew Garfield stuff was better. I mean if that's your opinion, fine but give some actual fact.
* Troper/LadyNorbert: I enjoy a lot of the Critic's old videos. I'm just really not into the newer format. Now, in fairness, I never watched ''WebVideo/DemoReel'' so I didn't have any understanding of who Malcolm and Tamara were when they started appearing in Critic's videos; to me, they just seemed to come out of nowhere. I have nothing against them, they seem like nice people, but I liked it better when it was just the Critic on his own. For me, though, the [=DMoS=] is the review of Creator/TimBurton's ''Film/AliceInWonderland2010''. Obviously, Critic doesn't like it, while I do, but that's not the issue. The issue is that I have tried to watch this review multiple times, and I can never actually get to the review! The opening acting bit where Critic falls into Underland or whatever and runs into Alice and so forth drags on and on and on, to the point where I just can't watch it anymore. It's not entertaining, it's not funny, and as much as I'd like to see his actual review of the film, I can't sit through the original content long enough to get there.

* Tropers/TheFarmboy: Since the Wall Banger page as a whole got nixed, I figured I would post what would be a crummy moment from Nostalgia Critic. The RunningGag with WesternAnimation/PinkyAndTheBrain breaking up through-out ''Film/ThePurge'' review concludes with an animated short with Brain snapping and verbally chewing out Pinky. My problem with the short was that Brain blames Pinky for all of their plans failing, while completely forgetting the times where it wasn't Pinky's fault such as the Big-Ears and Noodle-Noggin episode, and the Gyp-Parody episode (where ''Pinky'' knew the answer for the final question while Brain lost all of the money). Not to mention that the show had established that Brain's plans were all doomed to fail whenever or not Pinky botches it. And I think it wouldn't make sense for Brain to keep his rage in until Pinky said one line too many, since in the show, Brain would often hit Pinky whenever Pinky said something stupid. I thought I would let it slide, but overtime, it grew worse in my mind. Shame that Creator/MauriceLaMarche and Creator/RobPaulsen were roped in to reprise their roles for this.
* ''Film/TheMatrix'':

** zeesims: [[CatharsisFactor I need a place to vent out my frustration since this has been bugging me for a while]]. There are several words that describe my feelings towards the ''Pokémon'' segment, infuriating, insulting, disgusting, and disrespectful. When it comes to that rant of his; about the [[ItsPopularNowItSucks overexposure]], adults not liking it, and it being a "fad"; my main issue with this reasoning is that some of the things that he likes are also guilty of the same thing, (such as the Franchise/TeenageMutantNinjaTurtles in the late 80s and early 90s, and ''Franchise/{{Frozen}}''. [[DoubleStandard It just gives off the vibe that only the things he likes can be super popular]]). While overexposure can get annoying, is it really a good reason to hate something just for that? Then, there's that bit with adults not liking it; all this does is remind me of the [[AnimationAgeGhetto "Pokémon is for kids" stigma]] that plagues many adult fans. Then there's the fad bit; this just screams, "I don't like it, therefore it's a fad". This is just painful to watch; knowing that the franchise has grown to be more than just a kid's fad, with the games and TGC having [[MultipleDemographicAppeal multiple demographic appeal]]. [[{{Hypocrite}} Once again, the Ninja Turtles were guilty]][[http://www.themarysue.com/evil-ninja-turtles/ of the things mentioned above at]][[http://articles.latimes.com/1990-08-27/news/vw-116_1_teenage-mutant-ninja-turtles the height of its popularity]], but knowing him, [[DoubleStandard it's magically okay just because he grew up with it]]. Then there's this line, "we didn't know what it was, but we didn't care", so you hate it even though you know nothing about it? This whole rant just felt ignorant, arrogant, pretentious, and prejudicial to me. Then we get to the actual commercial...Ugh, this part is just ridiculous, the comments above definitely describe my feelings towards this bit, mean-spirited and unfair. How would he feel if someone pulled off the same thing with the Ninja Turtles? I've seen several comments giving him a free pass with the [[JustJokingJustification "just a character" excuse]], [[SarcasmMode because that will totally make people less angry]]; frankly, I don't even know how much of it is an act. Just like with the Franchise/PowerRangers mentioned above, Pokémon has brought joy and inspiration to many, a community has formed and brought many people together, young and old. So to see it getting treated so cruelly like this just makes me sick; joke or not. I've grown so tired of the CausticCritic [[AccentuateTheNegative accentuating the negative]] gimmick, and even some of his real life attitude towards certain things (such as ''Pokémon'', ''Power Rangers'', ''Franchise/{{Cars}}'', ''Franchise/SailorMoon'', ''Film/MoulinRogue'') makes me regret the fact that I used to find him funny. I'm just done with him (and frankly any caustic critic) at this point.

* Scsigs: Since people have stated good points about my other picks, ''Film/HocusPocus'' and the HypeBacklash video, I'll bring up his video about whitewashing. I get why he wanted to make the video. It was a hot button issue, especially in 2016 where ''everything'' was for little to no reason, depending on what you're talking about. However, his major talking points included live action people playing roles originally meant for people of other ethnicities or physical statures, roles played by people from other countries, and voice acting in both western animation and anime dubbing. First, the Critic is on the more liberal side of this argument, with saying various things about these topics, but succumbs to not really making any good points about them, with Critical Research Failure, [[DoubleStandard double standards]], and just a plain old failure to use common sense abound. He talks about whitewashing by bringing up ''Film/GhostInTheShell2017'' with casting Creator/ScarlettJohansson as the Major. I can understand this criticism, since it's a film based on a Japanese anime film and its setting is still uniquely Japanese with Asian actors in most of the other roles, but he then praises films that RaceLift white characters. {{Double Standard}}s much? Then he brings up Creator/HenryCavill and Creator/AndrewGarfield playing Superman and Spider-Man, with them both being British (although Garfield was born in America) as disqualifiers for playing these roles. What? Ethnicity and race are 2 completely different things. He then talks about ''Film/TheLordOfTheRings'' casting regular actors over little people except for back shots in some scenes in the roles of the Hobbits. What? Hobbits aren't little people, they're fully grown people that just happen to be smaller than other races. Casting regular people and using either camera tricks, green-screening, or CGI was their best bet at portraying the world most accurately to the books. That argument makes no sense. Then, he also touches upon actors of other races voicing characters in animated works, including anime dubs, that aren't Japanese or whatever race or even gender or age of their characters. First of all, there ''are'' Asian actors working in the anime dubbing industry. Second, the acting pool for anime dubs, unless paid for by a larger company, is rather low, due to usually requiring non-union actors who'll accept the lower pay than union and prelay work, which is why we don't see many high-profile actors who'll slum for less money to do dub work that often. So, it makes sense to use not just Asian actors, who aren't probably going to settle for dubbing work anyways. Also, not every anime is set in Japan. There are several shows and films, Studio Ghibli's in particular, that are set more in worlds of multiple cultures, or just Germanic worlds, so that shouldn't matter anyways. Second, using adults to voice kids ''is'' an industry standard and the norm. It's done to maintain consistency in the characters' voices as long as possible if they don't change in any way, especially if a series goes on for multiple years where a kid's voice would break eventually, so it's a JustifiedTrope. However, there ''have'' been [[SubvertedTrope subversions]] of this in some productions. Third, not every child actor is going to be able to give the most believable performance out there. With how many films he's reviewed as the NC, you'd think he'd remember that. Fourth, anime dubbing is not the same as prelay. It's even challenging for experienced voice actors to do because they have to adapt to a completely different style of voice acting. Most kid actors can't act that well already, so they'd be pretty lost on what to do, though there certainly ''have'' been a few subversions here, like Aaron Dismuke as Al in ''Anime/FullmetalAlchemist,'' since he didn't have any mouthflaps to act against, and Daveigh Chase as Chihiro in ''Anime/SpiritedAway'', but they are outliers in this case. This topic is heavily debated everywhere and Doug's serious mishandling of this situation isn't helping matters so much as it confuses them, which is why I don't like this video. You can clearly see why.

* Nightfurywitch: I used to LOVE Doug's older reviews as a kid, but even back then there was one joke in [[Recap/TheNostalgiaCriticS3E36PoundPuppies his review]] of ''WesternAnimation/PoundPuppiesAndTheLegendOfBigPaw'' that I always found a bit too mean. He closes out the review by saying next time you see a sweet, innocent puppy in the shelter, you should "let it rot" (his words, not mine) so we don't get more bad movies like this. As someone who loves animals, I felt this joke was way too harsh and out of left field for what seemed to be just a bland inoffensive 80's cartoon.

* ''WesternAnimation/ThomasAndTheMagicRailroad'':

* Tropers/KenyaStarflight: Since my new Dethroning Moment for the Critic was cut, I'm reverting back to my old one -- his ''Raiders of the Story Arc'' segment that covered ''WesternAnimation/TheTransformers''. I'd been waiting for him to cover something Transformers-related besides the film franchise for some time, but the extended "Soundwave wants to be in a romantic comedy" bit spoiled it for me. The joke was [[OverlyLongGag way too long]], out-of-character (which might have been forgivable had the joke been at all humorous), and the punchline far too weak to justify nearly two minutes of the review being devoted to it. If the Critic wanted to vent his spleen about the predictable nature of romantic comedies, he should have done so in a review of an actual romantic comedy, not shoehorned his rant into a ''Transformers'' review.
* Tropers/{{PutYaGunsOn}}: While I'm not necessarily offended at any of the Critic's race-related humor, this one just felt cheap and thrown in there. But that pales in comparison to his cringeworthy joke about Creator/PatMorita as Santa in ''Film/BabesInToyland''. All I could see was "lol let's call him [[JapaneseRanguage Santa Craus]] and name the reindeer after Chinese food lol cus he's um...Asian". I don't feel attacked by his jokes at all, it's more about annoyance at the fact that his Asian-related humor at the time hadn't really evolved much past "14-year-old who thinks it's funny to call [[RacialFaceBlindness all Asian people]] Creator/JackieChan". His recent Yogi Bear review (released ''years'' after these reviews) certainly doesn't help his case. [[superscript:(As Yogi and Boo Boo drag a train of picnic tables with a dog on it) "We're eating the dog too! Korean food tonight!"]] While I don't think Doug is necessarily a racist or hateful towards East Asians, I'm convinced he still sees us as socially acceptable targets for a cheap laugh.
* AnnoyedMechanoid: While I still watch his videos from time to time, I'm very irritated that his "Top 11 Simpsons Episodes" started with a gigantic Take That to modern ''[[WesternAnimation/TheSimpsons Simpsons]]'' episodes and unfairly painted all of them as "beating a dead horse with another dead horse" by using the infamous Music/{{Kesha}} Simpsons intro as one of the clips (the other being the Creator/{{Banksy}} intro) to "represent" modern Simpsons as a whole. It's sad to see NC of all people lumping almost 20 seasons of a TV show all into the same category of badness just to strengthen his own argument on what individual "classic" episodes he considers to be good. All of the episodes on that list (apart from every Simpsons Treehouse of Horror episode) were from seasons 2-8. If you want to do a Top 11 on classic Simpsons episodes, just call it "Top 11 Classic Simpsons Episodes" and limit yourself to working with only certain seasons. Most importantly, don't write the rest off as bad in the process to make your own points stronger.
* Nightfurywitch: I used to LOVE Doug's older reviews as a kid, but even back then there was one joke in his ''WesternAnimation/PoundPuppiesAndTheLegendOfBigPaw'' review that I always found a bit too mean. He closes out the review by saying next time you see a sweet, innocent puppy in the shelter, you should "let it rot" (his words, not mine) so we don't get more bad movies like this. As someone who loves animals, I felt this joke was way too harsh and out of left field for what seemed to be just a bland inoffensive 80's cartoon.

* @/KevinKlawitter: In his reviews of ''Film/MortalKombatTheMovie'' and ''Film/MortalKombatAnnihilation'' he completely ignores two important subplots in the first movie. Now, this might seem reasonable if it were simply for brevity's sake, but then, he claims their absence to be plot holes. One of these subplots involves Shang Tsung killing Liu Kang's little brother. This is the reason Liu Kang enters the tournament; he wants revenge. This plot point is made incredibly obvious by the second act, and even comes back in the end. But why does the Critic say he entered the tournament? "Because he's...Asian". There's no way the Critic could not have known Liu Kang's motives, but yet, he still ignored them so he could make a race-based joke.
* Tropers/{{Vader999}}: I was rather surprised no one as of yet mentioned his review of ''Anime/PokemonTheFirstMovie''. Especially the part where, instead of mentioning Mewtwo's real motivation, he claims the movie never gave him one. [[spoiler:It did: Mewtwo resented being a human-made clone Pokemon without a clear purpose for existing and hated seeing Pokemon treated like pets or experiments by humans.]]
* ''Film/BatmanAndRobin'':

* Tropers/{{JayJuJayMeMan}}: Doug Walker always says adaptations should stand on their own, but that still doesn't justify his review of ''WesternAnimation/AdventuresOfSonicTheHedgehog''. He blatantly ignores the fact that Robotnik's minions were all enemies Sonic fought in the games. He also ignores several other elements from the games that were imitated in the show, several of which are pretty much {{foregone conclusion}}s for anybody who's ever been near the games. Perhaps he just hasn't played the games, but he should have at least done the research on them beforehand. Not liking the show is fine, but facts need to be kept straight.
* Tropers/{{DeMac}}: I used to like the Nostalgia Critic alright, but his complaining about kids' cartoons got to be really ridiculous as time went on. One specific example I remember is when he reviews ''Series/TheSuperMarioBrosSuperShow'' and starts complaining about the ''Film/MadMax'' parody. In the skit, the oil tanker that everyone is fighting over has been replaced with a tanker full of pasta sauce. Doug doesn't complain that it's unfunny, or anything like that. He complains that it makes no sense for people to fight over pasta sauce, as though a kiddie parody of an 80's action franchise is supposed to be well-plotted and perfectly logical. After that, it was hard for me to see Doug's reviews as anything but absurd nitpicking over low-hanging fruits.
* Tropers/{{prettycoolguy}}: As someone who used to obsess over [=TGWTG=]/Channel Awesome during their "peak", for the lack of a better word, I will make the argument that, even up to today[[note]]Though, granted, I have not seen any Doug Walker videos since [=#ChangeTheChannel=] happened[[/note]], the worst moment in any Nostalgia Critic review is a joke in his ''Film/ErnestSavesChristmas'' review. And no, it isn't the one you think. [[note]]He caught flack for a bit during a moment where the future Santa is putting on a rather crummy puppet show for kids. Doug then says "Yes, I think he entertains the autistic children". This rightfully got instant and fierce backlash, and he reuploaded the episode shortly afterwards without the line. As someone on the spectrum, that "joke" was ignorant, barely logical and of horrendous taste, and a potential [=DMoS=] on its own, but it's still better than this one.[[/note]] It is when he reacts to a scene where Santa Claus gets thrown into a jail cell. In it, he turns around to see all the inmates walking around and giving him looks, and Santa makes a forlorn face because he is scared about the fate of Christmas. Doug, in his infinite wisdom, dubs over the scene to make it as if Santa says to the inmates "Wazzap, my n[=***=][=**=]?". And yes, Doug actually says the word. For him as a White person to use that word is one thing, but the content of this joke, when you dissect it, is confused at best and racist at worst. First of all, if the intent is to show that Santa is uncomfortable with his surroundings and he is trying to relate with them, which is what I can best assume Doug was going for, that doesn't line up because Santa doesn't look uncomfortable in the slightest. The inmates don't do anything remotely threatening. Sure, they stare, but that's to be expected when someone is thrown into a prison cell. Second, there is the whole African-American/street gang/criminal connection. What makes this sting is that, in that prison cell shot, there are more people in the room that are White than Black! There are four White men and three Black men in the shot, and one of the Black men laying down is hardly visible. The joke probably only sprang from Doug's head because one of the Black men is directly in frame for one shot and staring at the camera. In the context of this scene, it is made clear that these are just people in a cell and there is nothing social or political or even any kind of joke to take from the scene's execution, especially in an Ernest movie. So the only way I can see that joke materializing is assumptions in Doug's mind. Was the mere thought of a Black person in a prison staring someone enough to connect with gangs and saying the n-word despite, again, there being absolutely nothing to read about the scene? Even in the generous interpretation that this is supposed to be a misguided "fish out of water" situation for Santa in-universe, even though, again, more people in the cell are White, it sure wouldn't make sense for Santa Claus to say this, considering he delivers presents to every corner of the globe. I know he grew up in the Chicagoland suburbs, which I know from experience are pretty White, but there is still no excuse to make this tone-deaf comment that reads of ignorance above all else. The fact that he apologized for the autism joke in the same video and not this makes me feel he only is considerate for other viewpoints when he is in trouble, which screams disingenuous. That phony, inertial, antagonizing feeling is something I think is universal in all the Critic's worst moments, but I feel it reared its ugliest head here.
* Tropers/{{WillieManga}}: To make two things clear, I hate ''Film/BioDome'' and for the most part, I like Critic's review of it. But one thing that annoyed me is that he continually misnamed Bud, calling him Squirrel. I understand Squirrel is a nickname, but the characters call him Bud more often. With that, you'd think he would call him Bud and make things less confusing. Come on, dude!
* Tropers/Erin582: While I still have a soft spot in my heart for ''The Nostalgia Critic'' and still gravitate towards his older reviews, I am dismayed by the more mean-spirited approach he has taken in his revived series (and if the failure of ''WebVideo/DemoReel'' had anything to do with this, I don't know but I can and do sympathize if true). That being said, though, while I do see that the "everyone is entitled to my opinion" edge he has taken in his newer reviews is alienating, I've come to see that he's always been like that. Case in point, his ''"Top 11 Scariest Performances"'' from 2010 had brought up Hannibal Lecter as one of his choices and included scenes from ''Film/SilenceOfTheLambs'' and ''Film/RedDragon'' to support this. Yet, when he then told fans about them questioning him as to why he didn't include ''Film/{{Hannibal}}'', in his reasoning, he called both the film [[FanHater and its fans stupid]] and claimed his opinion was "right" without any hint of joking or irony in his voice.
* Tropers/{{LLSmoothJ}}: I usually like watching the Critic's reviews and I never thought I'd find myself adding a moment, but his ''Film/{{Airborne}}'' review left a bitter taste in my mouth. Particularly his constant criticism of Mitchell [[WhatMeasureIsANonBadass for daring to avoid physical confrontation]]. [[SarcasmMode Because a real man always fights, no matter how more effective talking it out like civilized people could be.]]
* Tropers/{{Eegah}}: ''Film/JawsTheRevenge'': The joke about Michael's daughter asking about sex, given that Creator/JudithBarsi would be murdered before being old enough to learn about it herself.
* Tropers/{{SparkyYoungUpstart}}: His review of ''Film/CopAndAHalf'' started out fine enough, and I knew he was going to make a joke about the situation (a little kid refusing to give information on a crime unless he's allowed to be a cop), but his response? A dramatization in which the kid gets beaten by a cop. Spurts of blood can be seen coming from offscreen. That's right, in a show where he normally gets pissed off at movies for being harmful to children, he actually makes a joke about child abuse so that he can force in a ''Film/TheLordOfTheRings'' reference. I couldn't even watch the rest of the review after that.
* @/{{eneuman96}}: Though his post-revival episodes have quite the BrokenBase, my least favorite moment of the show overall is from a pre-cancellation episode: ''Film/TheAvengers1998''. It starts out with the NC under the impression that he's about to review the (unreleased at the time of the review) superhero movie. When it turns out to be an entirely different movie of the same name, he gives three of the most ear-bleedingly piercing [[BigNo Big Nos]] in history in rapid succession, and they are seriously painful to listen to. There were plenty of funnier ways he could have reacted to that sort of news, and his reaction really doesn't help the common misconception that his comedy is all just screaming and yelling.

* ''Film/MortalKombatTheMovie'' and ''Film/MortalKombatAnnihilation'':
* @/KevinKlawitter: In his reviews of the movies, he completely ignores two important subplots in the first movie. Now, this might seem reasonable if it were simply for brevity's sake, but then, he claims their absence to be plot holes. One of these subplots involves Shang Tsung killing Liu Kang's little brother. This is the reason Liu Kang enters the tournament; he wants revenge. This plot point is made incredibly obvious by the second act, and even comes back in the end. But why does the Critic say he entered the tournament? "Because he's...Asian". There's no way the Critic could not have known Liu Kang's motives, but yet, he still ignored them so he could make a race-based joke.
** Tropers/{{PutYaGunsOn}}: While I'm not necessarily offended at any of the Critic's race-related humor, this one just felt cheap and thrown in there. But that pales in comparison to his cringeworthy joke about Creator/PatMorita as Santa in ''Film/BabesInToyland''. All I could see was "lol let's call him [[JapaneseRanguage Santa Craus]] and name the reindeer after Chinese food lol cus he's um...Asian". I don't feel attacked by his jokes at all, it's more about annoyance at the fact that his Asian-related humor at the time hadn't really evolved much past "14-year-old who thinks it's funny to call [[RacialFaceBlindness all Asian people]] Creator/JackieChan". His recent Yogi Bear review (released ''years'' after these reviews) certainly doesn't help his case. [[superscript:(As Yogi and Boo Boo drag a train of picnic tables with a dog on it) "We're eating the dog too! Korean food tonight!"]] While I don't think Doug is necessarily a racist or hateful towards East Asians, I'm convinced he still sees us as socially acceptable targets for a cheap laugh.

* Tropers/{{Michaelsar}}: One moment that always rubbed me the wrong way was the ending of the review of ''WesternAnimation/TheSwanPrincess''. Basically, after spending the entire episode calling the film "Diet Creator/{{Disney}}", the Nostalgia Critic is shown a bottle of soda called "Diet Creator/DreamWorks", which features ''WesternAnimation/TheNutJob'', the ''WesternAnimation/IceAge'' movies, and the ''WesternAnimation/{{Rio}}'' movies. He then points out that this is the second review in a row where he's [[TakeThat insulted]] Creator/BlueSkyStudios [[note]]The otherwise pretty funny ''WesternAnimation/{{Foodfight}}'' review also had a pretty harsh TakeThat towards the company[[/note]]...and then continues to do it, claiming that he should stop if they ever make something good. Then he's shown a bottle of "Diet Creator/{{Pixar}}", which features ''WesternAnimation/Cars2'' and ''WesternAnimation/MonstersUniversity'', basically just a joke about Pixar not making good movies anymore (in his opinion, anyway). We get it, Doug, you hate Pixar and Blue Sky Studios. This joke was not funny, it was just needlessly harsh.

* Tropers/T-Troper24: For me, it's been his lack of acknowledgement towards [[WesternAnimation/TeenageMutantNinjaTurtles2003 the two cartoons that came]] [[WesternAnimation/TeenageMutantNinjaTurtles2012 after the 80's one ended]]. I remember the first time watching the review for ''Out of the Shadows''. The thing that ticked me off were the two instances where he began asking if either Leo or Shredder ever had a moment where he wasn't a dickhead leader, or doesn't go out like an ass in respective order. I saw a comment saying the following thing. 1) Leo not being an asshole leader in the 2003 series. 2) Shredder not going out like a bitch in the 2003 series. 3) Captures everything Turtles and takes itself seriously in the 2003 series. Even the 2012 series gets this right, but nope, he just shows instances of both Leo and Shredder in such moments just to prove his point. Seriously, both of these shows are or more or less should be vlog worthy and yet, there he is, exclusively binge watching both AT and SU. Correct me if I'm wrong but I watched that April fools vlog on Website/YouTube where he jokingly talked about the first episode of [[WesternAnimation/MyLittlePonyFriendshipIsMagic FIM]] with some other dude on a couch. I recall reading a comment saying that he won't look at the show because it's not his thing. Fair enough, I'm neutral over the show myself; however, in that same comment thread, someone in a response said that he said the exact same thing about Adventure Time and yet he's still making vlogs for it. Okay, let me ask a very legit question. what on Earth does he plan on looking at once both of those shows end? One of which from what I hear is ending next year. And yet, he barely even references either of the two TMNT cartoons that are amazing in their own right: one is faithful to the comics that started the whole franchise and the other tells its own story how it wants. But nope, he's all "Eh, TMNT never makes Leo a good leader, nor does it make Shredder a badass". I'm not trying to say he has to look at those two shows. But some form of acknowledgement would be much appreciated.

* [=K00L4=]: While I consider myself a fan of Doug's work, I wasn't too big on his review of ''The Lion King (2019)''. Now, while there were certainly good moments, the bad outweighed the good. For one thing, he nitpicks about very minor things. The Lions talking is the best example. Doug, just because a single aspect is unrealistic in an overall realistic movie doesn't automatically make the movie godawful. The nail in the coffin is that he disrespects the opinions of people who liked the movie. Seriously, Doug? I know that Critic is just an exaggeration of what Doug's true opinion is, but the entire video came out as pure unadulterated Narm. And not the good kind.

** Tropers/{{Jackninja5SataniaLover}}: His “explanation” in his fuck-ups video really didn’t address what he did at all. Like Pgj1997 said, he claims he didn’t say the show sucked despite not seeing it when he did. However he goes on to present this as more of “Don’t review Thomas without seeing the show”. That wasn’t what it was about. No one is saying he should watch the show. A little research is all we ask for (although really that won’t do a lot to explain the movie in all honesty) and especially don’t say the show is brainless when you haven’t even seen it. If he did watch it and said it sucked, there’d be no actual issue because while I disagree it is his opinion. Instead he just goes for a cheap “Thomas is for babies” joke that’s ironically more juvenile than the show itself (even during the show’s worst stages).

* Tropers/{{prettycoolguy}}: As someone who used to obsess over [=TGWTG=]/Channel Awesome during their "peak", for the lack of a better word, I will make the argument that, even up to today[[note]]Though, granted, I have not seen any Doug Walker videos since [=#ChangeTheChannel=] happened[[/note]], the worst moment in any Nostalgia Critic review is a joke in his ''Film/ErnestSavesChristmas'' review. And no, it isn't the one you think. [[note]]He caught flack for a bit during a moment where the future Santa is putting on a rather crummy puppet show for kids. Doug then says "Yes, I think he entertains the autistic children". This rightfully got instant and fierce backlash, and he reuploaded the episode shortly afterwards without the line. As someone on the spectrum, that "joke" was ignorant, barely logical and of horrendous taste, and a potential [=DMoS=] on its own, but it's still better than this one.[[/note]] It is when he reacts to a scene where Santa Claus gets thrown into a jail cell. In it, he turns around to see all the inmates walking around and giving him looks, and Santa makes a forlorn face because he is scared about the fate of Christmas. Doug, in his infinite wisdom, dubs over the scene to make it as if Santa says to the inmates "Wazzap, my n[=***=]?". And yes, Doug actually says the word. For him as a White person to use that word is one thing, but the content of this joke, when you dissect it, is confused at best and racist at worst. First of all, if the intent is to show that Santa is uncomfortable with his surroundings and he is trying to relate with them, which is what I can best assume Doug was going for, that doesn't line up because Santa doesn't look uncomfortable in the slightest. The inmates don't do anything remotely threatening. Sure, they stare, but that's to be expected when someone is thrown into a prison cell. Second, there is the whole African-American/street gang/criminal connection. What makes this sting is that, in that prison cell shot, there are more people in the room that are White than Black! There are four White men and three Black men in the shot, and one of the Black men laying down is hardly visible. The joke probably only sprang from Doug's head because one of the Black men is directly in frame for one shot and staring at the camera. In the context of this scene, it is made clear that these are just people in a cell and there is nothing social or political or even any kind of joke to take from the scene's execution, especially in an Ernest movie. So the only way I can see that joke materializing is assumptions in Doug's mind. Was the mere thought of a Black person in a prison staring someone enough to connect with gangs and saying the n-word despite, again, there being absolutely nothing to read about the scene? Even in the generous interpretation that this is supposed to be a misguided "fish out of water" situation for Santa in-universe, even though, again, more people in the cell are White, it sure wouldn't make sense for Santa Claus to say this, considering he delivers presents to every corner of the globe. I know he grew up in the Chicagoland suburbs, which I know from experience are pretty White, but there is still no excuse to make this tone-deaf comment that reads of ignorance above all else. The fact that he apologized for the autism joke in the same video and not this makes me feel he only is considerate for other viewpoints when he is in trouble, which screams disingenuous. That phony, inertial, antagonizing feeling is something I think is universal in all the Critic's worst moments, but I feel it reared its ugliest head here.

* Tropers/{{prettycoolguy}}: As someone who used to obsess over [=TGWTG=]/Channel Awesome during their "peak", for the lack of a better word, I will make the argument that, even up to today[[note]]Though, granted, I have not seen any Doug Walker videos since [=#ChangeTheChannel=] happened[[/note]], the worst moment in any Nostalgia Critic review is a joke in his ''Film/ErnestSavesChristmas'' review. And no, it isn't the one you think. [[note]]He caught flack for a bit during a moment where the future Santa is putting on a rather crummy puppet show for kids. Doug then says "Yes, I think he entertains the autistic children". This rightfully got instant and fierce backlash, and he reuploaded the episode shortly afterwards without the line. As someone on the spectrum, that "joke" was ignorant, barely logical and of horrendous taste, and a potential [=DMoS=] on its own, but it's still better than this one.[[/note]] It is when he reacts to a scene where Santa Claus gets thrown into a jail cell. In it, he turns around to see all the inmates walking around and giving him looks, and Santa makes a forlorn face because he is scared about the fate of Christmas. Doug, in his infinite wisdom, dubs over the scene to make it as if Santa says to the inmates "Wazzap, my n[=***=][=**=]?". And yes, Doug actually says the word. For him as a White person to use that word is one thing, but the content of this joke, when you dissect it, is confused at best and racist at worst. First of all, if the intent is to show that Santa is uncomfortable with his surroundings and he is trying to relate with them, which is what I can best assume Doug was going for, that doesn't line up because Santa doesn't look uncomfortable in the slightest. The inmates don't do anything remotely threatening. Sure, they stare, but that's to be expected when someone is thrown into a prison cell. Second, there is the whole African-American/street gang/criminal connection. What makes this sting is that, in that prison cell shot, there are more people in the room that are White than Black! There are four White men and three Black men in the shot, and one of the Black men laying down is hardly visible. The joke probably only sprang from Doug's head because one of the Black men is directly in frame for one shot and staring at the camera. In the context of this scene, it is made clear that these are just people in a cell and there is nothing social or political or even any kind of joke to take from the scene's execution, especially in an Ernest movie. So the only way I can see that joke materializing is assumptions in Doug's mind. Was the mere thought of a Black person in a prison staring someone enough to connect with gangs and saying the n-word despite, again, there being absolutely nothing to read about the scene? Even in the generous interpretation that this is supposed to be a misguided "fish out of water" situation for Santa in-universe, even though, again, more people in the cell are White, it sure wouldn't make sense for Santa Claus to say this, considering he delivers presents to every corner of the globe. I know he grew up in the Chicagoland suburbs, which I know from experience are pretty White, but there is still no excuse to make this tone-deaf comment that reads of ignorance above all else. The fact that he apologized for the autism joke in the same video and not this makes me feel he only is considerate for other viewpoints when he is in trouble, which screams disingenuous. That phony, inertial, antagonizing feeling is something I think is universal in all the Critic's worst moments, but I feel it reared its ugliest head here.

* Tropers/DLAbaoaqu: The review of ''Film/GhostRider'' when he first learns of Blackheart and gets a Bible to see if the movie is serious about the name. A verse was fabricated for the sake of a joke, but it came off as a middle finger to people who actually study it. Classy, Doug, considering that actual scholars have analyzed for decades and, when looked through linguistic and anthropological lenses, the "inconsistencies" (as you would term them) can be easily resolved. Also, way to go picking the low-hanging fruit.

* Scsigs: Since people have stated good points about my other picks, ''Film/HocusPocus'' and the HypeBacklash video, I'll bring up his video about whitewashing. I get why he wanted to make the video. It was a hot button issue, especially in 2016 where ''everything'' was for little to no reason, depending on what you're talking about. However, his major talking points included live action people playing roles originally meant for people of other ethnicities or physical statures, roles played by people from other countries, and voice acting in both western animation and anime dubbing. First, the Critic is on the more liberal side of this argument, with saying various things about these topics, but succumbs to not really making any good points about them, with Critical Research Failure, [[DoubleStandard double standards]], and just a plain old failure to use common sense abound. He talks about whitewashing by bringing up ''Film/GhostInTheShell2017 (2017)'' with casting Creator/ScarlettJohansson as the Major. I can understand this criticism, since it's a film based on a Japanese anime film and its setting is still uniquely Japanese with Asian actors in most of the other roles, but he then praises films that RaceLift white characters. {{Double Standard}}s much? Then he brings up Creator/HenryCavill and Creator/AndrewGarfield playing Superman and Spider-Man, with them both being British (although Garfield was born in America) as disqualifiers for playing these roles. What? Ethnicity and race are 2 completely different things. He then talks about ''Film/TheLordOfTheRings'' casting regular actors over little people except for back shots in some scenes in the roles of the Hobbits. What? Hobbits aren't little people, they're fully grown people that just happen to be smaller than other races. Casting regular people and using either camera tricks, green-screening, or CGI was their best bet at portraying the world most accurately to the books. That argument makes no sense. Then, he also touches upon actors of other races voicing characters in animated works, including anime dubs, that aren't Japanese or whatever race or even gender or age of their characters. First of all, there ''are'' Asian actors working in the anime dubbing industry. Second, the acting pool for anime dubs, unless paid for by a larger company, is rather low, due to usually requiring non-union actors who'll accept the lower pay than union and prelay work, which is why we don't see many high-profile actors who'll slum for less money to do dub work that often. So, it makes sense to use not just Asian actors, who aren't probably going to settle for dubbing work anyways. Also, not every anime is set in Japan. There are several shows and films, Studio Ghibli's in particular, that are set more in worlds of multiple cultures, or just Germanic worlds, so that shouldn't matter anyways. Second, using adults to voice kids ''is'' an industry standard and the norm. It's done to maintain consistency in the characters' voices as long as possible if they don't change in any way, especially if a series goes on for multiple years where a kid's voice would break eventually, so it's a JustifiedTrope. However, there ''have'' been [[SubvertedTrope subversions]] of this in some productions. Third, not every child actor is going to be able to give the most believable performance out there. With how many films he's reviewed as the NC, you'd think he'd remember that. Fourth, anime dubbing is not the same as prelay. It's even challenging for experienced voice actors to do because they have to adapt to a completely different style of voice acting. Most kid actors can't act that well already, so they'd be pretty lost on what to do, though there certainly ''have'' been a few subversions here, like Aaron Dismuke as Al in ''Anime/FullmetalAlchemist,'' since he didn't have any mouthflaps to act against, and Daveigh Chase as Chihiro in ''Anime/SpiritedAway'', but they are outliers in this case. This topic is heavily debated everywhere and Doug's serious mishandling of this situation isn't helping matters so much as it confuses them, which is why I don't like this video. You can clearly see why.

* Tropers/{{prettycoolguy}}: As someone who used to obsess over [=TGWTG=]/Channel Awesome during their "peak", for the lack of a better word, I will make the argument that, even up to today[[note]]Though, granted, I have not seen any Doug Walker videos since [=#ChangeTheChannel=] happened[[/note]], the worst moment in any Nostalgia Critic review is a joke in his ''Film/ErnestSavesChristmas'' review. And no, it isn't the one you think. [[note]]He caught flack for a bit during a moment where the future Santa is putting on a rather crummy puppet show for kids. Doug then says "Yes, I think he entertains the autistic children". This rightfully got instant and fierce backlash, and he reuploaded the episode shortly afterwards without the line. As someone on the spectrum, that "joke" was ignorant, barely logical and of horrendous taste, and a potential [=DMoS=] on its own, but it's still better than this one.[[/note]] It is when he reacts to a scene where Santa Claus gets thrown into a jail cell. In it, he turns around to see all the inmates walking around and giving him looks, and Santa makes a forlorn face because he is scared about the fate of Christmas. Doug, in his infinite wisdom, dubs over the scene to make it as if Santa says to the inmates "Wazzap, my n[=***=][=**=]?". And yes, Doug actually says the word. For him as a White person to use that word is one thing, but the content of this joke, when you dissect it, is confused at best and racist at worst. First of all, if the intent is to show that Santa is uncomfortable with his surroundings and he is trying to relate with them, which is what I can best assume Doug was going for, that doesn't line up because Santa doesn't look uncomfortable in the slightest. The inmates don't do anything remotely threatening. Sure, they stare, but that's to be expected when someone is thrown into a prison cell. Second, there is the whole African-American/street gang/criminal connection. What makes this sting is that, in that prison cell shot, there are more people in the room that are White than Black! There are four White men and three Black men in the shot, and one of the Black men laying down is hardly visible. The joke probably only sprang from Doug's head because one of the Black men is directly in frame for one shot and staring at the camera. In the context of this scene, it is made clear that this are just people in a cell and there is nothing social or political or even any kind of joke to take from the scene's execution, especially in an Ernest movie. So the only way I can see that joke materializing is assumptions in Doug's mind. Was the mere thought of a Black person in a prison staring someone enough to connect with gangs and saying the n-word despite, again, there being absolutely nothing to read about the scene? Even in the generous interpretation that this is supposed to be a misguided "fish out of water" situation for Santa in-universe, even though, again, more people in the cell are White, it sure wouldn't make sense for Santa Claus to say this, considering he delivers presents to every corner of the globe. I know he grew up in the Chicagoland suburbs, which I know from experience are pretty White, but there is still no excuse to make this tone-deaf comment that reads of ignorance above all else. The fact that he apologized for the autism joke in the same video and not this makes me feel he only is considerate for other viewpoints when he is in trouble, which screams disingenuous. That phony, inertial, antagonizing feeling is something I think is universal in all the Critic's worst moments, but I feel it reared its ugliest head here.

* Tropers/KenyaStarflight: Since my new Dethroning Moment for the Critic was cut, I'm reverting back to my old one -- his ''Raiders of the Story Arc'' segment that covered ''WesternAnimation/TheTransformers''. I'd been waiting for him to cover something Transformers-related besides the film franchise for some time, but the extended "Soundwave wants to be in a romantic comedy" bit spoiled it for me. The joke was [[OverlyLongGag way too long]], out-of-character (which might have been forgivable had the joke been at all humorous), and the punchline far too weak to justify nearly two minutes of the review being devoted to it. If the Critic wanted to vent his spleen about the predicable nature of romantic comedies, he should have done so in a review of an actual romantic comedy, not shoehorned his rant into a ''Transformers'' review.