Follow TV Tropes

Following

History Creator / RogerEbert

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Wiki/ namespace clean up.


[[CausticCritic His wrath, when deployed, was legendary.]] He published three compilations of bad reviews: ''[[Film/{{North}} I Hated, Hated, HATED This Movie!]]'' (reviews published in 1999 and earlier), ''[[Film/DeuceBigalow Your Movie Sucks]]'' (reviews published from 2000-2006) and ''[[Film/TransformersRevengeOfTheFallen A Horrible Experience of Unbearable Length]]'' (reviews published from 2006-2011). He printed annual compilations of his movie reviews from TheEighties onward, and wrote three books of essays about his favorite movies entitled ''The Great Movies''. These essays are also available on his website in a condensed form. He also wrote Literature/EbertsGlossaryOfMovieTerms, ''Ebert's Little Movie Glossary'' and ''Ebert's Bigger Little Movie Glossary,'' which are books of FilmTropes in ''Literature/TheDevilsDictionary'' form. (An even bigger movie glossary is on his web page.) They could be considered a proto Wiki/TVTropes in a sense (and the {{Trope Namer|s}} for many).

to:

[[CausticCritic His wrath, when deployed, was legendary.]] He published three compilations of bad reviews: ''[[Film/{{North}} I Hated, Hated, HATED This Movie!]]'' (reviews published in 1999 and earlier), ''[[Film/DeuceBigalow Your Movie Sucks]]'' (reviews published from 2000-2006) and ''[[Film/TransformersRevengeOfTheFallen A Horrible Experience of Unbearable Length]]'' (reviews published from 2006-2011). He printed annual compilations of his movie reviews from TheEighties onward, and wrote three books of essays about his favorite movies entitled ''The Great Movies''. These essays are also available on his website in a condensed form. He also wrote Literature/EbertsGlossaryOfMovieTerms, ''Ebert's Little Movie Glossary'' and ''Ebert's Bigger Little Movie Glossary,'' which are books of FilmTropes in ''Literature/TheDevilsDictionary'' form. (An even bigger movie glossary is on his web page.) They could be considered a proto Wiki/TVTropes Website/TVTropes in a sense (and the {{Trope Namer|s}} for many).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


When Siskel died in 1999, Ebert kept on the show with guest hosts until it was settled that it would be ''At the Movies with Ebert and Roeper,'' with Richard Roeper, another ''Chicago Sun-Times'' critic. This made him the most important living movie critic in America. The show ended in 2008 partially because his throat cancer was preventing him from doing most of the episodes for over a year and a half (to do film reviews on television, you obviously have to be able to speak). Sadly, due to a few surgeries that successfully eradicated his cancer, [[TheSpeechless Ebert lost the ability to speak entirely]] and part of his lower jaw was removed. During the last few years of his life, he "spoke" through handwritten notes and a computer speech program. In 2010, a Scottish company created a voice similar to Ebert's own for him to use as his new "voice," using his DVD commentaries and other similar recordings.

to:

When Siskel died in 1999, Ebert kept on the show with guest hosts until it was settled that it would be ''At the Movies with Ebert and Roeper,'' with Richard Roeper, another ''Chicago Sun-Times'' critic. This made him the most important living movie critic in America. The show ended in 2008 partially because his throat cancer (which he had first been diagnosed with in 2002) was preventing him from doing most of the episodes for over a year and a half (to do film reviews on television, you obviously have to be able to speak). Sadly, due to a few surgeries that successfully eradicated his cancer, [[TheSpeechless Ebert lost the ability to speak entirely]] and part of his lower jaw was removed. During the last few years of his life, he "spoke" through handwritten notes and a computer speech program. In 2010, a Scottish company created a voice similar to Ebert's own for him to use as his new "voice," using his DVD commentaries and other similar recordings.

Added: 108

Changed: 108

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Another review [[InUniverse addressed the]] UltimateShowdownOfUltimateDestiny where one comment said that [[Franchise/XMen Wolverine would beat Storm]] in a fight because he could heal, whereas Storm would die once stabbed by Wolverine. His response was simply to question how someone whose power is [[GoodThingYouCanHeal healing]] could be more powerful than someone who can ''[[ElementalPowers control the elements.]]''

to:

* Another review [[InUniverse addressed the]] UltimateShowdownOfUltimateDestiny where one comment said that [[Franchise/XMen Wolverine would beat Storm]] in a fight because he could heal, whereas Storm would die once stabbed by Wolverine. His response was simply to question how someone whose power is [[GoodThingYouCanHeal healing]] could be more powerful than someone who can ''[[ElementalPowers control the elements.]]''
elements]]''.



* BerserkButton: Movies that were exploitative, racist, or trying too hard to be "hip" tended to ignite his rage the most.

to:

* BerserkButton: BerserkButton:
**
Movies that were exploitative, racist, or trying too hard to be "hip" tended to ignite his rage the most.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** As a [[RaisedCatholic lapsed Catholic]] himself, Ebert ''hated'' when the movies [[ChristianityIsCatholic got Catholicism]] wrong, and was particularly snarky to schlocky religious horror like ''Film/EndOfDays'' or ''Film/{{Constantine}}''.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


In 2011, to replace the new ''At the Movies'' which had been canceled by its distributor, Ebert and his wife Chaz started their own movie review show on Creator/{{PBS}} called ''Ebert Presents at the Movies'' hosted by Christy Lemire of the Associated Press and Ignatiy Vishnevetsky of Mubi, which follows largely the same format as Ebert's other shows. Ebert himself appeared in a segment on the show called "Roger's Office" which features voice over narration (either with the help of either his new "voice," or a famous friend such as Creator/WernerHerzog or Bill Kurtis) of one of his recent reviews or musings. Ebert still wrote weekly review columns as well as a daily blog and maintained a very active Website/{{Twitter}} account, where he was still an influential force in movie criticism's new dominant medium. His last cancer "treatments" had been such tough going through that he vowed that if the cancer re-emerged, he would let it take its course; [[FaceDeathWithDignity this eventually transpired in 2013.]] His website continues to publish reviews, now written by a team of reviewers.

to:

In 2011, to replace the new ''At the Movies'' which had been canceled by its distributor, Ebert and his wife Chaz started their own movie review show on Creator/{{PBS}} called ''Ebert Presents at the Movies'' hosted by Christy Lemire of the Associated Press and Ignatiy Vishnevetsky of Mubi, which follows largely the same format as Ebert's other shows. Ebert himself appeared in a segment on the show called "Roger's Office" which features voice over narration (either with the help of either his new "voice," or a famous friend such as Creator/WernerHerzog or Bill Kurtis) of one of his recent reviews or musings. Ebert [[TheShowMustGoOn still wrote weekly review columns as well as a daily blog blog]] and maintained a very active Website/{{Twitter}} account, where he was still an influential force in movie criticism's new dominant medium. His last cancer "treatments" had been such tough going through that he vowed that if the cancer re-emerged, he would let it take its course; [[FaceDeathWithDignity this eventually transpired in 2013.]] His website continues to publish reviews, now written by a team of reviewers.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Rant Inducing Slight is now a disambig.


* RantInducingSlight: Filmmakers invoking NotScreenedForCritics as a ''[[ItsNotSupposedToWinOscars defense]]'' of their work was a sore point for Ebert. Ebert's responses to Creator/KevinSmith and Creator/RobSchneider are two classic examples of this, and from 2005 to 2006, he instituted the "Wagging Finger Of Shame" for all movies that were not screened for critics. (It was discontinued when Ebert realized Hollywood wasn't taking the "Wagging Finger Of Shame" seriously.)
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** In his review of Part 2 of ''Film/HarryPotterAndTheDeathlyHallows'', he wrote that Dumbledore had more important things on his mind than evacuating the students of Hogwarts before the impending final battle. [[spoiler:Dumbledore died in the previous film.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** From [[http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/19970411/REVIEWS/704110304/1023 his review]] of ''Film/PinkFlamingos'':
--->'''Ebert:''' Note: I am not giving a star rating to ''Pink Flamingos'', because stars simply seem not to apply. It should be considered not as a film but as a fact, or perhaps as an object.

to:

** *** From [[http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/19970411/REVIEWS/704110304/1023 his review]] of ''Film/PinkFlamingos'':
--->'''Ebert:''' ---->'''Ebert:''' Note: I am not giving a star rating to ''Pink Flamingos'', because stars simply seem not to apply. It should be considered not as a film but as a fact, or perhaps as an object.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* WunzaPlot

Added: 339

Changed: 77

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* WalkingOutOnTheShow: He didn't do it very often, but he did leave ''Caligula'' before it was over.

to:

* WalkingOutOnTheShow: WalkingOutOnTheShow:
**
He didn't do it very often, but he did leave ''Caligula'' before it was over.over.
** [[https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/tru-loved-2008 He wrote a review]] of the obscure indie film ''Tru Loved'' with the punchline in the last sentence: [[spoiler:he stopped watching a mere ''eight minutes'' in]]. His editor didn't accept the review as-is.

Added: 166

Changed: 118

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* SignificantBirthDate: Born the exact same day (June 18, 1942) as Music/PaulMcCartney. Ironically, though, he only gave ''Film/GiveMyRegardsToBroadStreet'' one star.



* WritersCannotDoMath: Ebert was consistent in translating a two-and-a-half star review (out of four) as a "marginal thumbs-down" on ''Siskel & Ebert'', and describing it in text as a "negative review". Two-and-a-half stars out of four is 62.5%, a passing grade in many places, and certainly means there was more about the film to like than dislike.

to:

* WritersCannotDoMath: Ebert was consistent in translating a two-and-a-half star review (out of four) as a "marginal thumbs-down" on ''Siskel & Ebert'', and describing it in text as a "negative review". Two-and-a-half stars out of four is 62.5%, a passing grade in many places, and certainly means there was more about the film to like than dislike. Siskel apparently went on a case-by-case basis, occasionally going with a "thumbs-up" on a two-and-a-half star movie.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* WalkingOutOnTheShow: He didn't do it very often, but he did leave ''Caligula'' before it was over.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* TrailersAlwaysSpoil: Because of Roger's endless work cycle -- watching movies, writing reviews, filming ''At The Movies'', as well as conducting interviews and writing thinkpieces -- he rarely saw trailers or even any advertising for most films and went into them cold, which was reflected in his reviews. So unaffected he was by this trope, he was even unaware of the basic premises for such films like ''Film/TheTrumanShow''[[note]]in which he theorized while watching the film that Truman might have actually been suffering from paranoia fuel until the Christ of portion of the film kicked in[[/note]], ''Film/FieldOfDreams''[[note]]because of the AmbiguousSyntax of the title, he didn't know that the film was about baseball until the vision of the baseball field appears to Ray[[/note]], and ''Film/IronMan''[[note]]although Roger was an avid comics reader in his youth, Iron Man was not in his orbit and was completely in the dark about Tony Stark, even admitting in his review that he half-assumed Tony's brain would be put into a robot a la ''[[Film/Robocop1987 Robocop]]''[[/note]]

to:

* TrailersAlwaysSpoil: Because of Roger's endless work cycle -- watching movies, writing reviews, filming ''At The Movies'', as well as conducting interviews and writing thinkpieces -- he rarely saw trailers or even any advertising for most films and went into them cold, which was reflected in his reviews. So unaffected he was by this trope, he was even unaware of the basic premises for such films like ''Film/TheTrumanShow''[[note]]in which he theorized while watching the film that Truman might have actually been suffering from paranoia fuel until the Christ of Christof portion of the film kicked in[[/note]], ''Film/FieldOfDreams''[[note]]because of the AmbiguousSyntax of the title, he didn't know that the film was about baseball until the vision of the baseball field appears to Ray[[/note]], and ''Film/IronMan''[[note]]although Roger was an avid comics reader in his youth, Iron Man was not in his orbit and was completely in the dark about Tony Stark, even admitting in his review that he half-assumed Tony's brain would be put into a robot a la ''[[Film/Robocop1987 Robocop]]''[[/note]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* TrailersAlwaysSpoil: Because of Roger's endless work cycle -- watching movies, writing reviews, filming ''At The Movies'', as well as conducting interviews and writing thinkpieces -- he rarely saw trailers or even any advertising for most films and went into them cold, which was reflected in his reviews. So unaffected he was by this trope, he was even unaware of the basic premises for such films like ''Film/TheTrumanShow''[[note]]in which he theorized while watching the film that Truman might have actually been suffering from paranoia fuel until the Christof portion of the film kicked in[[/note]], ''Film/FieldOfDreams''[[note]]because of the AmbiguousSyntax of the title, he didn't know that the film was about baseball until the vision of the baseball field appears to Ray[[/note]], and ''Film/IronMan''[[note]]although Roger was an avid comics reader in his youth, Iron Man was not in his orbit and was completely in the dark about Tony Stark, even admitting in his review that he half-assumed Tony's brain would be put into a robot a la ''[[Film/Robocop1987 Robocop]]''[[/note]]

to:

* TrailersAlwaysSpoil: Because of Roger's endless work cycle -- watching movies, writing reviews, filming ''At The Movies'', as well as conducting interviews and writing thinkpieces -- he rarely saw trailers or even any advertising for most films and went into them cold, which was reflected in his reviews. So unaffected he was by this trope, he was even unaware of the basic premises for such films like ''Film/TheTrumanShow''[[note]]in which he theorized while watching the film that Truman might have actually been suffering from paranoia fuel until the Christof Christ of portion of the film kicked in[[/note]], ''Film/FieldOfDreams''[[note]]because of the AmbiguousSyntax of the title, he didn't know that the film was about baseball until the vision of the baseball field appears to Ray[[/note]], and ''Film/IronMan''[[note]]although Roger was an avid comics reader in his youth, Iron Man was not in his orbit and was completely in the dark about Tony Stark, even admitting in his review that he half-assumed Tony's brain would be put into a robot a la ''[[Film/Robocop1987 Robocop]]''[[/note]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
No longer a valid trivia item.


* QuoteSource:
** ActorAllusion
** AlphaBitch
** BrokeTheRatingScale
** TheChiefsDaughter
** CrossesTheLineTwice
** DutchAngle
** EndingFatigue
** ExactlyWhatItSaysOnTheTin
** IdiotPlot
** Film/MyDinnerWithAndre
** Creator/NicolasCage
** NoOSHACompliance
** PragmaticAdaptation
** Film/{{Roxanne}}
** RogerRabbitEffect
** ShotForShotRemake
** WhiteMansBurden
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** TheChiefsDaughter
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** ShotForShotRemake
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** Film/{{Roxanne}}
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:


* BigAnimeEyes: [[https://youtu.be/_9WEyuMq0Yk?t=161 Here]]'s what Ebert has to say about anime eyes.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** InsultToRocks
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** BrokeTheRatingScale


Added DiffLines:

** DutchAngle
** EndingFatigue


Added DiffLines:

** IdiotPlot
** InsultToRocks
** Film/MyDinnerWithAndre
** Creator/NicolasCage
** NoOSHACompliance
** PragmaticAdaptation
** RogerRabbitEffect
** WhiteMansBurden
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* BerserkButton: Movies that were exploitative, racist, or trying too hard to be "hip" tended to ignite his rage the most.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* CoolOldGuy: Took on this role in the Roeper years. Unlike Gene, who was just four years younger than Roger, Roeper was younger and less academic, thus letting Ebert act like the more worldly of the two. It was played for laughs as well, such as when Ebert claimed to be more in touch with younger viewers.

to:

* CoolOldGuy: Took on this role in the Roeper years. Unlike Gene, who was just four years younger than Roger, Roeper was younger years, due to the age gap between Roger and less academic, thus letting Ebert act like the more worldly of the two. Richard. It was played for laughs as well, such as when Ebert claimed to be more in touch with younger viewers.viewers during his review of ''Garfield: A Tale of Two Kitties''.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* BigFun: Was often mocked for being overweight, but had an ever-present wit and was often seen smiling and joking in his show.

to:

* BigFun: Was often mocked for being overweight, but had an ever-present wit and was often could frequently be seen smiling and joking in his show.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* BigFun: Was often mocked for being overweight, but had an ever-present wit and was often seen smiling and joking in his show.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* CoolOldGuy: Took on this role in the Roeper years. Unlike Gene, who was just four years younger than Roger, Roeper was younger and less academic, thus letting Ebert act like the more worldly of the two. It was played for laughs as well, such as when Ebert claimed to be more in touch with younger viewers.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** His original review of ''Film/WalkTheLine'' was under the impression that a) Joaquin Phoenix was lip-synching to Johnny Cash's music, as he felt it was too uncanny to be Phoenix and b) Johnny Cash proposing to June Carter mid-song was a Hollywood fabrication, although one that Ebert liked anyway. To his astonishment, he learned through the credits that Phoenix did indeed do his own singing, and through responses to the Movie Answer Man, that Cash proposed to Carter as depicted in the film, which was then amended in the review.

to:

** His original review of ''Film/WalkTheLine'' was under the impression that a) Joaquin Phoenix was lip-synching to Johnny Cash's music, as he felt it was too uncanny to be Phoenix and b) Johnny Cash proposing to June Carter mid-song was a Hollywood fabrication, although one that Ebert liked anyway. To his astonishment, he learned through the credits that Phoenix did indeed do his own singing, and through thorough responses to the Movie Answer Man, that Cash proposed to Carter as depicted in the film, which was then amended in the review.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Moved from Trivia.Roger Ebert because Creator pages are supposed to list Trivia instead of having a separate Trivia subpage; see Creator Page Guidelines

Added DiffLines:

* CowboyBebopAtHisComputer: On occasion, he goofed some significant details in his reviews (usually due to taking notes while watching films, or lack of notes when trying to recall a movie when writing a review). A couple of notable instances:
** His review of ''Film/HalloweenIIISeasonOfTheWitch'', which he mistakenly believed to be an ImmediateSequel to ''Film/HalloweenII'' and confused the assassin who immolates himself in the film’s opening for Michael Myers[[note]]possibly due to Myers having also been incinerated in a hospital at the end of ''II'', albeit under completely different circumstances[[/note]].
** Roger found the practice vault in ''Film/OceansEleven'' to be wildly superfluous and wondered why it had to be an exact replica; [[spoiler: it's because the "practice" vault was also used to stage a fake robbery to fool the mark via CameraSpoofing, maybe the most vital part of the whole con.]]
** When giving a synopsis of ''Film/RookieOfTheYear'', he mentions Henry going to the fateful Cubs game with his dad. Henry went with just his friends and his mom got him the ticket; Henry's DisappearedDad is the biggest part of his personal backstory.
** He wondered in his review of ''Film/TheDarkKnightRises'' where Bane had the financial resources to pull off his coup of Gotham; while it's mentioned rather quickly, it is revealed Bane was bankrolled by John Daggett under the pretense of taking over Wayne Enterprises.
** In his ''Film/TheTwilightSamurai'' review, Ebert notes that the movie takes place in the same period as ''Film/TheLastSamurai'' and ''Film/SevenSamurai'', during the Mejii Restoration (19th century). ''Seven Samurai'' takes place in the 16th century.
** He was on the receiving end of this once: a mother wrote in to tell him how her daughter was upset at his negative review of one of the ''Literature/{{Twilight}}'' movies, and she comforted her by telling her that Ebert also panned ''Franchise/StarWars'' when it was new, [[ItWillNeverCatchOn saying it would bomb.]] Ebert's response was to awesomely and politely direct the irate mother to his glowing 1977 review of ''Film/ANewHope'', which was [[CriticalResearchFailure easily found on his website the entire time.]]


Added DiffLines:

* DiedDuringProduction: Ebert had mentioned that he was working on a "Great Movies" review for ''Film/TheSacrifice'', but passed away before he could finish it.


Added DiffLines:

* EmptyChairMemorial: Films are screened for Chicago-area film critics in a small theater, the Lake Street Screening Room. When Ebert died, flowers were placed on his usual chair in the theater, and nobody has sat there since.


Added DiffLines:

* HeAlsoDid: Has not only wrote many books on film but also wrote a cookbook for using a rice cooker. Said cookbook was written after he lost his lower jaw and thus his ability to eat; he relied on his "food memory" to write the recipes.


Added DiffLines:

* OldShame: When one works as long and prolific as Roger did, this is bound to happen from time to time:
** He sincerely regretted his infamous quote on video games not able to be art. Ebert later likened his original statement to a movie critic complaining about a movie they had never watched.
** Ben Stiller revealed after Ebert's death that Roger personally apologized to Ben regarding his harsh review of ''Film/{{Zoolander}}'', which Roger trashed for the subplot of assassinating the prime minister of Malaysia in the wake of the terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001, which ''Zoolander'' opened in the shadow of and fell into DudeNotFunny for Roger. After some distance from the tragedies, Roger gave it another chance on his own time and told Ben it made him laugh.
** His review of ''Film/DumbAndDumber'' was a middling two-star reception, saying while it had a couple of big laughs, it flubbed other comic payoffs. As he reviewed other, lesser comedies in its wake, while becoming an ardent fan of the Farrelly Brothers, he would lament short-changing ''Dumb and Dumber'', saying at least it had a scene that nearly killed him with laughter (the dead parakeet reveal), compared to truly average comedies that could muster nothing more than mild chuckles out of him.
** In his review of ''[[Film/CharliesAngels2000 Charlie's Angels: Full Throttle]]'', he offered a ''mea culpa'' of his vicious half-star review of the original film, in which he took some notably personal shots at the trio of actresses slumming (in his mind) to such a work. He chalked it up to probably being in a foul mood that day, and while he fell short of recommending ''Full Throttle'', he noted there was nothing harmful about a few actresses getting to play secret agents that was worth that kind of vitriol.


Added DiffLines:

* QuoteSource:
** ActorAllusion
** AlphaBitch
** CrossesTheLineTwice
** ExactlyWhatItSaysOnTheTin

Added: 22

Changed: 195

Removed: 111

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:


-->-- '''Roger Ebert''' on ''Film/DeuceBigalow: European Gigolo,'' a movie on his [[RogerEbertMostHatedFilmList most hated film list.]]

to:

-->-- '''Roger Ebert''' on ''Film/DeuceBigalow: European Gigolo,'' a movie on his [[RogerEbertMostHatedFilmList most hated film list.]]
list.



!!Films he really liked:

* RogerEbertGreatMoviesList

to:

!!Films he really liked:

!! {{Trope Namer|s}} for:

* RogerEbertGreatMoviesList
FruitCart
* HyperlinkStory
* [[invoked]]IdiotPlot



!!Films he really hated:

* RogerEbertMostHatedFilmList

----
!! {{Trope Namer|s}} for:

* FruitCart
* HyperlinkStory
* [[invoked]]IdiotPlot
----

to:

!!Films he really hated:

* RogerEbertMostHatedFilmList

----
!! {{Trope Namer|s}} for:

* FruitCart
* HyperlinkStory
* [[invoked]]IdiotPlot
----



* FourPointScale: Following the Sun-Times editorial policy, Ebert assigned his movie reviews four-star ratings, but often commented on the limitations of the system, such as in his blog post "[[http://www.rogerebert.com/rogers-journal/you-give-out-too-many-stars You Give Out Too Many Stars]]." He notes that his reviews do tend to skew positive, and that he considered 2.5 stars to be a pan[[note]]though he also once noted that 2.5 could register as a full 3 stars if said film was of interest in some way to the viewer, or they were a big fan of the genre/director/etc.[[/note]]. He also wrote a lengthy series of appreciations of [[RogerEbertGreatMoviesList Great Movies]], all of which were given four stars. That said, he [[CausticCritic never hesitated to award low marks]] to [[RogerEbertMostHatedFilmList bad movies]], though for one to earn ''zero'' stars, he had to consider it not just bad but somehow immoral.

to:

* FourPointScale: Following the Sun-Times editorial policy, Ebert assigned his movie reviews four-star ratings, but often commented on the limitations of the system, such as in his blog post "[[http://www.rogerebert.com/rogers-journal/you-give-out-too-many-stars You Give Out Too Many Stars]]." He notes that his reviews do tend to skew positive, and that he considered 2.5 stars to be a pan[[note]]though he also once noted that 2.5 could register as a full 3 stars if said film was of interest in some way to the viewer, or they were a big fan of the genre/director/etc.[[/note]]. He also wrote a lengthy series of appreciations of [[RogerEbertGreatMoviesList Great Movies]], Movies, all of which were given four stars. That said, he [[CausticCritic never hesitated to award low marks]] to [[RogerEbertMostHatedFilmList bad movies]], movies, though for one to earn ''zero'' stars, he had to consider it not just bad but somehow immoral.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Siskel and Ebert's [[LikeAnOldMarriedCouple passive aggressive chemistry]] was the stuff of legend. It was often thought that due to their occasionally hostile on-screen presence when they disagreed, that the two hated each other. However, [[VitriolicBestBuds each considered the other a close friend,]] even if their relationship was competitive by nature. In fact, in 2009 on the tenth anniversary of Siskel's death, Ebert posted a [[http://blogs.suntimes.com/ebert/2009/02/i_remember_gene.html touching remembrance]] of his friend on his blog.

When Siskel [[AuthorExistenceFailure died in 1999,]] Ebert kept on the show with guest hosts until it was settled that it would be ''At the Movies with Ebert and Roeper,'' with Richard Roeper, another ''Chicago Sun-Times'' critic. This made him the most important living movie critic in America. The show ended in 2008 partially because his throat cancer was preventing him from doing most of the episodes for over a year and a half (to do film reviews on television, you obviously have to be able to speak). Sadly, due to a few surgeries that successfully eradicated his cancer, [[TheSpeechless Ebert lost the ability to speak entirely]] and part of his lower jaw was removed. During the last few years of his life, he "spoke" through handwritten notes and a computer speech program. In 2010, a Scottish company created a voice similar to Ebert's own for him to use as his new "voice," using his DVD commentaries and other similar recordings.

to:

Siskel and Ebert's [[LikeAnOldMarriedCouple passive aggressive passive-aggressive chemistry]] was the stuff of legend. It was often thought that due to their occasionally hostile on-screen presence when they disagreed, that the two hated each other. However, [[VitriolicBestBuds each considered the other a close friend,]] even if their relationship was competitive by nature. In fact, in 2009 on the tenth anniversary of Siskel's death, Ebert posted a [[http://blogs.suntimes.com/ebert/2009/02/i_remember_gene.html touching remembrance]] of his friend on his blog.

When Siskel [[AuthorExistenceFailure died in 1999,]] 1999, Ebert kept on the show with guest hosts until it was settled that it would be ''At the Movies with Ebert and Roeper,'' with Richard Roeper, another ''Chicago Sun-Times'' critic. This made him the most important living movie critic in America. The show ended in 2008 partially because his throat cancer was preventing him from doing most of the episodes for over a year and a half (to do film reviews on television, you obviously have to be able to speak). Sadly, due to a few surgeries that successfully eradicated his cancer, [[TheSpeechless Ebert lost the ability to speak entirely]] and part of his lower jaw was removed. During the last few years of his life, he "spoke" through handwritten notes and a computer speech program. In 2010, a Scottish company created a voice similar to Ebert's own for him to use as his new "voice," using his DVD commentaries and other similar recordings.

Top