Follow TV Tropes

Following

History Creator / AtunSheiFilms

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* ShamelessSelfPromotion: Rakich has made it clear that he has absolutely no reservations about using videos aimed at his larger audience to promote his smaller or less well-known projects, such as featuring clips from ''Alien, Baby!'' in his video essays, making community posts about ''WebVideo/Frozen50sMan'' and even [[WolverinePublicity creating a minisode of his most popular series]] ''WebVideo/CheckmateLincolnites'' just to promote the wide release of ''Film/TheSudburyDevil''.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* ThatCameOutWrong: PlayedForLaughs in "Fixing ''Film/TheMummyTombOfTheDragonEmperor''", when defending why he thinks [[ThoseWackyNazis Nazis]] would be a perfect fit for the third film in ''Film/TheMummyTrilogy'' due to its overall aesthetic and time period:
--> '''Rakich:''' So I know what you're thinking. "Really, Nazis? We're doing Nazis?" Well, yeah! Nazis are frickin' awesome!\\
''[{{Beat}} as a graphic of the quote "'Nazis are frickin' awesome.' --Atun-Shei Films, 2018" appears on screen]''\\
'''Rakich:''' --BAD GUYS! They're awesome bad guys! Jesus!
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* TheProductionCurse: [[invoked]] "[[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GJIt6xEEP0c The Movie that was Cursed by the Norse Gods]]" has Rakich retell the story of the heavily TroubledProduction of ''Film/BeowulfAndGrendel'', and how it supposedly was ascribed to the film's composer (who was also the Ásatrú high priest of Iceland at the time) accidentally laying a curse instead of a blessing on the production of the film.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* RunForTheBorder: Parodied in his video on Vincent Witcher. After his ''Film/GodsAndGenerals'' review started getting brigaded by Neo-Confederates leaving nasty comments, he apparently fled to the northern Alaskan wilderness ([[DontExplainTheJoke as far north in the U.S. as possible]])[[note]]Obviously Alaska only became a part of the U.S. almost a decade after the Civil War concluded and was never a Union state during it, but RuleOfFunny is meant to apply here[[/note]] to wait until things cooled down.

Added: 762

Changed: 13

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* NobleSavage: Mostly defied in his videos on Native Americans, especially King Philip's War. While their culture is somewhat different from the white settlers', the Natives are still canny, politically-minded, and [[MirroringFactions driven by most of the same things as their rivals]]. He's also up front and candid about the severity of the violence they often inflicted on white civilians. Atun-Shei is vocally critical of what he sees as ''Film/{{The New World|2005}}'' invoking this trope through its theme of "humanity decoupling from nature," pointing out that not only were the English themselves pretty close to nature as a pre-industrial agrarian society, but that the Native peoples were every bit as much the unquestioned masters of their environment as the Europeans were of theirs.

to:

* NobleSavage: Mostly defied in his videos on Native Americans, especially King Philip's War. While their culture is somewhat different from the white settlers', the Natives are still canny, politically-minded, and [[MirroringFactions driven by most of the same things as their rivals]]. He's also up front and candid about the severity of the violence they often inflicted on white civilians. Atun-Shei Rakich is vocally critical of what he sees as ''Film/{{The New World|2005}}'' invoking this trope through its theme of "humanity decoupling from nature," pointing out that not only were the English themselves pretty close to nature as a pre-industrial agrarian society, but that the Native peoples were every bit as much the unquestioned masters of their environment as the Europeans were of theirs.theirs.
--> '''Rakich:''' Now, in fairness to the movie, if I was caught in a time warp to 17th-century Virginia, I would much rather live with the Algonquin than the English. I mean, I'd eat better, I'd have more personal freedom and [[BreadEggsMilkSquick I wouldn't have to constantly witness women being treated like absolute dogshit]]. But it would still ''suck'', I mean, it'd be a life of backbreaking hard work, y'know, and it wouldn't mean I wouldn't have social problems either! I mean, my brother-in-law might be an asshole, or my son might be an ungrateful brat who's unfit to hold my titles, uh, the Sachem might have a grudge against me and might be trying to make my life difficult!... Just because Algonquin life was tribal doesn't mean it wasn't complex!
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* BasedOnAGreatBigLie: Invoked. Rakich makes a point in most of his videos covering New Orleans "ghost stories" and other folklore that almost all of them either have [[VeryLooselyBasedOnATrueStory only a tiny kernel of truth to them]] or were completely made up and retold countless times by tour guides over the years. That doesn't stop him from spinning a good yarn with them, though, which is the true appeal of such ghost stories to begin with.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* TheThingThatWouldNotLeave: In [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NPsxMCQAUdQ his video describing the tale of Julie the Naked Ghost]], he briefly digresses to describe an anecdote he heard while at Mount Vernon about a man who once stayed with George and Martha Washington for ''six months'' simply because back then [[SacredHospitality it was considered unspeakably rude to ask someone to leave your home even when they were clearly taking advantage of you]]. Rakich concludes the anecdote (complete with a NotMakingThisUpDisclaimer) by mentioning that George Washington wrote just three words in his diary when the man departed at last after six months; "He finally left".
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* SugarWiki/GushingAboutShowsYouLike: ''Film/Ravenous1999'' is his favorite film by his own self-admission, and the two videos he's made on it so far are basically a cumulative hour and forty minutes of this, along with a heaping helping of EveryoneIsJesusInPurgatory and WhatDoYouMeanItsNotPolitical, which he also admits he's doing to "indulge the turtleneck-wearing, Creator/{{NPR}}-listening English major who lives in [his] head with a [[LongList bloated, long-winded, high-handed, eggheaded, grandiose, snooty, ostentatious, needlessly orated]] video essay in which [he uses] words like 'dialectic', and quote[s] from books with titles like 'the sexual politics of meat'". %%[[Invoked]]

to:

* SugarWiki/GushingAboutShowsYouLike: ''Film/Ravenous1999'' is his favorite film by his own self-admission, and the two videos he's made on it so far are basically a cumulative hour and forty minutes of this, along with a heaping helping of EveryoneIsJesusInPurgatory and WhatDoYouMeanItsNotPolitical, which he also admits he's doing to "indulge the turtleneck-wearing, Creator/{{NPR}}-listening English major who lives in [his] head with a [[LongList bloated, long-winded, high-handed, eggheaded, grandiose, snooty, ostentatious, needlessly orated]] video essay in which [he uses] words like 'dialectic', and quote[s] from books with titles like 'the sexual politics [='=]''The Sexual Politics of meat'".Meat''[='=]". %%[[Invoked]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* EarlyInstallmentWeirdness: It's very easy to tell which videos Rakich made at or near the start of his [=YouTube=] career, as they often cover a much broader range of topics than he's typically known for, the production value is very low and may just consist of him talking with a handful of visual aids and worst of all, he doesn't typically [[ShownTheirWork cite any sources]], as was the case with "King Philip's War: The Most Important American War You've Never Heard Of", which he has stated he created almost entirely from ''memory'' as opposed to any hard research.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* OldShame: {{Downplayed|Trope}}, but he's more or less repudiated his old CausticCritic persona, which shows up in his older film reviews (pre-2020, thereabouts). He has now pinned a disclaimer under his ''Film/GodsAndGenerals'' review saying that the video was made when his channel had a different tone and much smaller audience, linking to more up-to-date and better-articulated versions of the points he makes.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* OldShame: {{Downplayed|Trope}}, but he's more or less repudiated his old CausticCritic persona, which shows up in his older film reviews (pre-2020, thereabouts). He has now pinned a disclaimer under his ''Film/GodsAndGenerals'' review saying that the video was made when his channel had a different tone and much smaller audience, linking to more up-to-date and better-articulated versions of the points he makes.

Added: 503

Changed: 270

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** One of his major goals is trying to get people to understand how ''differently'' people thought and perceived the world in the past -- for example, poor white Southerners who owned no slaves themselves still putting their lives on the line to defend the institution because of how vital they thought it was to a functioning society, or people afraid of witchcraft because, from their perspective, the reality of supernatural powers and events influencing the world was as obvious as the sun in the sky. This isn't done to justify or excuse said views or behavior, but instead to educate people why such things were accepted.

to:

** One of his major goals is trying to get people to understand how ''differently'' people thought and perceived the world in the past -- for example, poor white Southerners who owned no slaves themselves still putting their lives on the line to defend the institution because of how vital they thought it was to a functioning society, or people afraid of witchcraft because, from their perspective, the reality of supernatural powers and events influencing the world was as obvious as the sun in the sky. This isn't done to justify or excuse said views or behavior, but instead to educate people why such things were accepted. He puts it succinctly in "The Top 10 Most Immersive Historical Movies of All Time" when discussing ''Film/BarryLyndon'', a film which in his opinion is one of the best showcases of characters with the regressive cultural attitudes of their time who are still relatable:
--> '''Rakich:''' The fact is, almost every person watching this video would never in a ''million years'' be able to honestly befriend anybody born before the Industrial Revolution. Harp on all you want about "[[YeGoodeOldeDays The Good Old Days]]" and how life was "so much simpler then", and how much you'd love to fight in UsefulNotes/TheAmericanRevolution or whatever. If you could go back in time and meet your six-times-great-grandfather, he'd think that you're lazy, effeminate, and insufferable.

Added: 859

Changed: 312

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ShownTheirWork: As any good student of history would do, he cites his sources to back up his points and claims in his videos. For example, in his ''Checkmate, Lincolnites!'' videos, he'll provide letters or diary entries written by important figures at the time to either prove his claims or disprove a point made by Johnny Reb.

to:

* ShownTheirWork: ShownTheirWork:
**
As any good student of history would do, he cites his sources to back up his points and claims in his videos. For example, in his ''Checkmate, Lincolnites!'' videos, he'll provide letters or diary entries written by important figures at the time to either prove his claims or disprove a point made by Johnny Reb.Reb.
** He has also come around on this point in regards to historical accuracy in filmmaking. As Rakich sees it, directors of a film have to on some level micro-manage every tiny niggling detail about their film, including production design, and once he himself had had to contend with his own constant struggles for historical accuracy and immersion with a minimal budget while filming ''Film/TheSudburyDevil'', he came to the conclusion that big-budget historical movies really ought to just do the history justice if they already have the money.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** The one notable exception to this is ''Film/GodsAndGenerals'', which he goes out of his way to trash on a historical, political, directorial and artistic level because it is just ''that bad''. Not only does Rakich despise the transparent Lost Cause apologia and revisionism rampant throughout the film, but that it's also mind-numbingly dull and overwrought despite its constant attempts at melodrama. All 45 minutes of his review on it have nothing positive to say whatsoever.

to:

** The one notable exception to this is ''Film/GodsAndGenerals'', which he goes out of his way to trash on a historical, political, directorial and artistic level because it is just ''that bad''. Not only does Rakich despise the transparent Lost Cause apologia and revisionism rampant throughout the film, but that he believes it's also mind-numbingly dull and overwrought despite its constant attempts at melodrama. All 45 minutes of his review on it have nothing positive to say whatsoever.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Generally averted in his historical movie video essays, where he'll go out of his way point out things that the film does well or services the film by way of better storytelling. In fact, a large aspect of "Fixing ''Film/{{Braveheart}}''" is rebelling against this exact type of nitpicky "[[TheThemeParkVersion This film is SO historically inaccurate!]]" discourse which has dominated discussion surrounding the film and propping up its myriad qualities, such as its great battle scenes and its simple but relatable story of a rural hero becoming a RebelLeader which fundamentally works well even if it has little basis in reality and runs on BlackAndWhiteMorality.
** The one notable exception to this is ''Film/GodsAndGenerals'', which he goes out of his way to trash on a historical, political, directorial and artistic level because it is just ''that bad''. Not only does Rakich despites the transparent Lost Cause apologia and revisionism rampant throughout the film, but that it's also mind-numbingly dull and overwrought despite its constant attempts at melodrama. All 45 minutes of his review on it have nothing positive to say whatsoever.

to:

** Generally averted in his historical movie video essays, where he'll go out of his way to point out things that the film does well or services service the film by way of better storytelling. In fact, a large aspect of "Fixing ''Film/{{Braveheart}}''" is rebelling against this exact type of nitpicky "[[TheThemeParkVersion This film is SO historically inaccurate!]]" discourse which has dominated discussion surrounding the film and propping up its myriad qualities, such as its great battle scenes and its simple but relatable story of a rural hero becoming a RebelLeader which fundamentally works well even if it has little basis in reality and runs on BlackAndWhiteMorality.
** The one notable exception to this is ''Film/GodsAndGenerals'', which he goes out of his way to trash on a historical, political, directorial and artistic level because it is just ''that bad''. Not only does Rakich despites despise the transparent Lost Cause apologia and revisionism rampant throughout the film, but that it's also mind-numbingly dull and overwrought despite its constant attempts at melodrama. All 45 minutes of his review on it have nothing positive to say whatsoever.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* CausticCritic:
** Generally averted in his historical movie video essays, where he'll go out of his way point out things that the film does well or services the film by way of better storytelling. In fact, a large aspect of "Fixing ''Film/{{Braveheart}}''" is rebelling against this exact type of nitpicky "[[TheThemeParkVersion This film is SO historically inaccurate!]]" discourse which has dominated discussion surrounding the film and propping up its myriad qualities, such as its great battle scenes and its simple but relatable story of a rural hero becoming a RebelLeader which fundamentally works well even if it has little basis in reality and runs on BlackAndWhiteMorality.
** The one notable exception to this is ''Film/GodsAndGenerals'', which he goes out of his way to trash on a historical, political, directorial and artistic level because it is just ''that bad''. Not only does Rakich despites the transparent Lost Cause apologia and revisionism rampant throughout the film, but that it's also mind-numbingly dull and overwrought despite its constant attempts at melodrama. All 45 minutes of his review on it have nothing positive to say whatsoever.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* OverlyNarrowSuperlative: In "Did Vikings Explore New England?", Rakich declares that ''[[Creator/HenryWadsworthLongfellow Tales Of A Wayside Inn]]'' is "The second sexiest piece of media set in the town of Sudbury", implicitly saying that the sexiest is his own film, ''Film/TheSudburyDevil'', which he then immediately plays a clip from.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* NightmareFetishist: In "Fixing ''Film/TheMummy2017''", he jokingly describes a bizarre fantasy of his where [[Film/TheMummy2017 Amanet]] and [[Film/TheMummy1999 Imhotep]] get it on while half-regenerated with scarabs crawling out of them.

to:

* NightmareFetishist: In "Fixing ''Film/TheMummy2017''", he jokingly describes a bizarre fantasy of his where [[Film/TheMummy2017 Amanet]] Ahmanet]] and [[Film/TheMummy1999 Imhotep]] get it on while half-regenerated with scarabs crawling out of them.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


'''Andrew Rakich''' (born c. 1991), better known on the internet as Atun-Shei Films, is an independent filmmaker, semi-amateur historian and [=YouTuber=] who has created and hosts several recurring series on his channel, as well as making numerous documentaries on New Orleans and New England, [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/King_Philip%27s_War King Philip's War]], and assorted folklore. He also sometimes creates video essays on historical films such as ''Film/{{Braveheart}}''.

to:

'''Andrew Rakich''' (born c. 1991), Rakich''', better known on the internet as Atun-Shei Films, is an independent filmmaker, semi-amateur historian and [=YouTuber=] who has created and hosts several recurring series on his channel, as well as making numerous documentaries on New Orleans and New England, [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/King_Philip%27s_War King Philip's War]], and assorted folklore. He also sometimes creates video essays on historical films such as ''Film/{{Braveheart}}''.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* AmbiguouslyBi: He's made reference to himself having a girlfriend, but he's also deliberately inserted HomoeroticSubtext of himself and Brandon F., a fellow history [=YouTuber=], into videos concerning him.

to:

* AmbiguouslyBi: He's made reference to himself having a girlfriend, and later still a fiancee and wife, but he's also deliberately inserted HomoeroticSubtext of himself and Brandon F., a fellow history [=YouTuber=], into videos concerning him.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* UncertainAudience: [[invoked]]He's admitted that his dream project probably doesn't have enough commercial potential given its budget to ever get made. That dream project? A WorkCom about the construction of the [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bent_Pyramid Bent Pyramid]] in AncientEgypt, where the hapless LoserProtagonist architect realizes from very early on (since pyramids need to be calculated out in advance to be constructed properly) that critical and catastrophic flaws in the pyramid's design are going to leave it looking like crap by the time it's complete. The rest of the show is him trying to hide the defects long enough to embezzle enough money to flee to another country before he's [[YouHaveFailedMe executed for his failures]], blissfully unaware that he's just as likely to have been [[ShootTheBuilder executed for his successes]] if it ''had'' worked out properly. Rakich has also gushed over a theoretical special episode where the Pharaoh comes to visit the worksite personally, and quickly proves to be the most RoyallyScrewedUp asshole imaginable, [[InbredAndEvil inbred]] to the point of [[RedRightHand near-deformity]], constantly demanding to [[IHaveYouNowMyPretty sleep with everyone's wives]] and having people executed for [[EvilIsPetty very petty reasons]], with an emphasis on demonstrating how, growing up in an extremely toxic environment where despotism and a [[AGodAmI god complex]] are imprinted onto his mind from a very young age, of ''course'' he's going to be just the absolute worst.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* NobleConfederateSoldier: Discussed in his video on ''Film/TheOutlawJoseyWales'', which he believes does this trope much better than ''Film/GodsAndGenerals''. Josey's not fighting for the South or "states' rights", nor is he interested in justifying either. His beef with the Union lies solely against the Redlegs who massacred his family and killed his surrendering men.

to:

* NobleConfederateSoldier: Discussed in his video on ''Film/TheOutlawJoseyWales'', which he believes does this trope much better than ''Film/GodsAndGenerals''. Josey's not fighting for the South or "states' rights", nor is he interested in justifying either. His beef with the Union lies solely against the Redlegs (pro-Union paramilitaries) who massacred his family and killed his surrendering men.

Added: 354

Changed: 8

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* VillainousValour: The cruel slaver Manuel Andry is described as acting in this manner. His slaves tried to kill him in his bed armed with axes and knives, and despite being unarmed himself he fought his way past them and escaped his plantation. Then, despite being injured, he mustered a militia of 80 other planters and ambushed Deslondes' army of 500 rebelling slaves. (A later video reexamining the revolt questions this sequence of events, noting that the only witness was Andry himself and that the physical layout of the plantation leaves more than a few questions.)

to:

* VillainousValour: The cruel slaver Manuel Andry is described as acting in this manner. His slaves tried to kill him in his bed armed with axes and knives, and despite being unarmed himself he fought his way past them and escaped his plantation. Then, despite being injured, he mustered a militia of 80 other planters and ambushed Charles Deslondes' army of 500 rebelling slaves. (A later video reexamining the revolt questions this sequence of events, noting that the only witness was Andry himself and that the physical layout of the plantation leaves more than a few questions.))
** The "Abolitionists" episode on John Brown's raid describes the bravery of one of the marines involved in suppressing the uprising who climbed into the Harper's Ferry armoury full of armed abolitionists waiting to kill him, charged at John Brown, slashed his throat and stabbed him hard enough that his sword blade bent in two before making his escape.

Changed: 1

Removed: 19

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


[[/index]]



[[index]]



[[index]]

to:

[[index]][[/index]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

[[index]]


Added DiffLines:

[[/index]]


Added DiffLines:

[[index]]


Added DiffLines:

[[index]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ''Film/AlienBaby Alien, Baby!''

to:

* ''Film/AlienBaby Alien, ''Alien, Baby!''
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ''Film/AlienBaby''

to:

* ''Film/AlienBaby''''Film/AlienBaby Alien, Baby!''
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* HormoneAddledTeenager: [[invoked]]''The Birth of an American Town'' examines how the settlers' children who reached adolescence in Sudbury, while we have no reason to doubt their religious piety, likely engaged in a lot of illicit sex due to a combination of hormones, the [[FairForItsDay surprisingly sex-positive rhetoric of the Puritans]] (Even if they strongly condemned fornication, homosexuality and masturbation) and the fact that Sudbury's communal governance meant frequent town assemblies often left homesteads conveniently devoid of parents. Of course, this type of behavior came with the heavy risk of children born out of wedlock due to the absence of birth control, which carried severe punishment and shame with it as it branded the mother with undeniable evidence of her guilt.

Top