Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Not So Different has been renamed, and it needs to be dewicked/moved
Changed line(s) 16 (click to see context) from:
* His monologue after UsefulNotes/DonaldTrump's first hundred days in office, where he viciously calls out the hardcore left-wingers who opposed Trump during the 2016 election, but also [[WeAreStrugglingTogether refused to vote for Hillary Clinton]] because she wasn't quite progressive enough for their tastes. Turning his criticism towards everyone who insisted that Clinton and Trump were NotSoDifferent, he recaps all of Trump's major political actions over the first 100 days of his presidency and earnestly asks [[ArmorPiercingQuestion if they genuinely believe that she would have done the same]].
to:
* His monologue after UsefulNotes/DonaldTrump's first hundred days in office, where he viciously calls out the hardcore left-wingers who opposed Trump during the 2016 election, but also [[WeAreStrugglingTogether refused to vote for Hillary Clinton]] because she wasn't quite progressive enough for their tastes. Turning his criticism towards everyone who insisted that Clinton and Trump were NotSoDifferent, the same, he recaps all of Trump's major political actions over the first 100 days of his presidency and earnestly asks [[ArmorPiercingQuestion if they genuinely believe that she would have done the same]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 18 (click to see context) from:
* [[https://bossip.com/1563892/aint-no-pass-bih-ice-cube-tells-bill-maher-he-made-house-nia-comment-because-of-swirly-past-video-43081/ Bill on the ''receiving'' end for once when Ice Cube tactfully explains why white people don't have]] NWordPrivileges.
to:
* Bill on the ''receiving'' end for once [[https://bossip.com/1563892/aint-no-pass-bih-ice-cube-tells-bill-maher-he-made-house-nia-comment-because-of-swirly-past-video-43081/ Bill on the ''receiving'' end for once when Ice Cube tactfully explains why white people don't have]] NWordPrivileges.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 3 (click to see context) from:
* November 7, 2008: After UsefulNotes/BarackObama's win in the 2008 presidential election, Bill uses the New Rule "Harass Backwards" [[TheReasonYouSuckSpeech to chastise the Republicans following their defeat]], and what they should do for Obama's presidency.
to:
* November 7, 2008: After UsefulNotes/BarackObama's win in the 2008 presidential election, Bill uses the New Rule "Harass Backwards" [[TheReasonYouSuckSpeech to chastise the Republicans following after their defeat]], and what they should do for Obama's presidency.
Changed line(s) 16 (click to see context) from:
* His monologue after UsefulNotes/DonaldTrump's first hundred days in office, where he viciously calls out the hardcore left-wingers who opposed Trump during the 2016 election, but also [[WeAreStrugglingTogether refused to vote for Hillary Clinton]] because she wasn't quite progressive enough for their tastes. Turning his criticism towards everyone who insisted that Clinton and Trump were NotSoDifferent, he recaps all of Trump's major political actions over the first hundred days of his presidency and earnestly asks [[ArmorPiercingQuestion if they genuinely believe that Clinton would have done the same]].
to:
* His monologue after UsefulNotes/DonaldTrump's first hundred days in office, where he viciously calls out the hardcore left-wingers who opposed Trump during the 2016 election, but also [[WeAreStrugglingTogether refused to vote for Hillary Clinton]] because she wasn't quite progressive enough for their tastes. Turning his criticism towards everyone who insisted that Clinton and Trump were NotSoDifferent, he recaps all of Trump's major political actions over the first hundred 100 days of his presidency and earnestly asks [[ArmorPiercingQuestion if they genuinely believe that Clinton she would have done the same]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 19,20 (click to see context) from:
* [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xtd4tds-I0U The New Rule segment]] from Feb 8th, 2019, takes aim at the notion that both political parties are equally to blame for the current state of US politics, calling out the rampant dishonesty and faulty logic that plagues the current GOP, and notes it is nowhere near equal to what happens within the Democratic Party:
-->'''Bill''': Howard Schultz says both sides engage in "revenge politics", but it wouldn't have even occurred to Democrats to simply ''refuse'' a President to fill a Supreme Court vacancy. Mitch [=McConnell=] ''did that''. He said, "I know it's in the Constitution. I don't care, ''make me.''" Both parties are not extreme. ''That's'' extreme. Al Gore conceded the 2000 Election for the good of the country. Would Bush have? Would ''Trump?'' Only one party thinks it's okay to have a side gig as a Russian agent! Trump fired the head of the FBI for doing his job with the Russian investigation, then he had the Russians over and ''laughed about it.'' That's not a bi-partisan problem. If Obama did it, he'd be in Supermax now trading cigarettes with the Unabomber. And are you really going to tell me that ''both sides'' are to blame for the state of the enviroment? One party trusts the science on climate change. The other asks "How can the Earth be warming if I'm holding a snowball?" So when you say that both are equally bad, just know that doesn't make you a sage. It's a stupid person's idea of a smart thing to say. It's a cheat. It's a way to pretend you're above it all when you're really just too lazy to tell shit from shinola. And it is the ''central fraudulent idea'' that allowed an outsider like Trump to get elected. It's one step up from "I don't vote." It's like saying "I don't read" makes you smarter. Or "I don't shower" makes you smell good.
-->'''Bill''': Howard Schultz says both sides engage in "revenge politics", but it wouldn't have even occurred to Democrats to simply ''refuse'' a President to fill a Supreme Court vacancy. Mitch [=McConnell=] ''did that''. He said, "I know it's in the Constitution. I don't care, ''make me.''" Both parties are not extreme. ''That's'' extreme. Al Gore conceded the 2000 Election for the good of the country. Would Bush have? Would ''Trump?'' Only one party thinks it's okay to have a side gig as a Russian agent! Trump fired the head of the FBI for doing his job with the Russian investigation, then he had the Russians over and ''laughed about it.'' That's not a bi-partisan problem. If Obama did it, he'd be in Supermax now trading cigarettes with the Unabomber. And are you really going to tell me that ''both sides'' are to blame for the state of the enviroment? One party trusts the science on climate change. The other asks "How can the Earth be warming if I'm holding a snowball?" So when you say that both are equally bad, just know that doesn't make you a sage. It's a stupid person's idea of a smart thing to say. It's a cheat. It's a way to pretend you're above it all when you're really just too lazy to tell shit from shinola. And it is the ''central fraudulent idea'' that allowed an outsider like Trump to get elected. It's one step up from "I don't vote." It's like saying "I don't read" makes you smarter. Or "I don't shower" makes you smell good.
to:
* [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xtd4tds-I0U The New Rule segment]] "Howie Wrong"]] from Feb 8th, February 8, 2019, takes aim at the notion that both political parties are equally to blame for the current state of US politics, calling out the rampant dishonesty and faulty logic that plagues the current GOP, and notes it is nowhere near equal to that what happens within the Democratic Party is ''nowhere'' near equal to what is accepted inside the Republican Party:
-->'''Bill''': Howard Schultz says both sides engage in "revenge politics", but it wouldn't have even occurred to Democratsto that you could simply ''refuse'' a President to fill a Supreme Court vacancy. Mitch [=McConnell=] ''did that''. He said, "I know it's in the Constitution. I don't care, ''make me.''" Both parties are not extreme. ''That's'' extreme, ''that's'' extreme. Al Gore conceded the 2000 Election election for the good of the country. Would Bush have? Would ''Trump?'' Only one party thinks it's okay for Presidents to have a side gig as a Russian agent! Trump fired the head of the FBI for doing his job with the Russian investigation, then he had the Russians over and ''laughed about it.'' That's not a bi-partisan problem. If Obama did it, he'd be in Supermax now trading cigarettes with the Unabomber. And are you really going to tell me that ''both sides'' are equally to blame for the state of the enviroment? environment? One party trusts the science on climate change. The change and the other asks "How can the Earth be warming if I'm holding a snowball?" So when you say that they're both are equally bad, just know that doesn't make you a sage. It's a stupid person's idea of a smart thing to say. It's a cheat. It's a way to pretend cheat that says you're above it all all, when you're really just too lazy to tell shit from shinola. And it is the ''central fraudulent idea'' that allowed an outsider like Trump to get elected. It's one step up from "I don't vote." It's like saying claiming "I don't read" makes you smarter. Or smarter, and "I don't shower" makes you smell good.
-->'''Bill''': Howard Schultz says both sides engage in "revenge politics", but it wouldn't have even occurred to Democrats
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None
Changed line(s) 19 (click to see context) from:
-->'''Bill''': Howard Schultz says both sides engage in "revenge politics." But it wouldn't have even occurred to Democrats to simply ''refuse'' a President to fill a Supreme Court vacancy. Mitch [=McConnell=] ''did that''. He said, "I know it's in the Constitution. I don't care, ''make me.''" Both parties are not extreme. ''That's'' extreme. Al Gore conceded the 2000 Election for the good of the country. Would Bush have? Would ''Trump?'' Only one party thinks it's okay to have a side gig as a Russian agent! Trump fired the head of the FBI for doing his job with the Russian investigation, then he had the Russians over and ''laughed about it.'' That's not a bi-partisan problem. If Obama did it, he'd be in Supermax trading cigarettes with the Unabomber! And are you really going to tell me that ''both sides'' are to blame for the state of the enviroment? One party trusts the science on climate change. The other asks "How can the Earth be warming if I'm holding a snowball?" So when you say that both are equally bad, just know that doesn't make you a sage. It's a stupid person's idea of a smart thing to say. It's a cheat. It's a way to pretend you're above it all when you're really just too lazy to tell shit from shinola. And it is the ''central fraudulent idea'' that allowed an outsider like Trump to get elected. It's one step up from "I don't vote." It's like saying "I don't read" makes you smarter. Or "I don't shower" makes you smell good.
to:
-->'''Bill''': Howard Schultz says both sides engage in "revenge politics." But politics", but it wouldn't have even occurred to Democrats to simply ''refuse'' a President to fill a Supreme Court vacancy. Mitch [=McConnell=] ''did that''. He said, "I know it's in the Constitution. I don't care, ''make me.''" Both parties are not extreme. ''That's'' extreme. Al Gore conceded the 2000 Election for the good of the country. Would Bush have? Would ''Trump?'' Only one party thinks it's okay to have a side gig as a Russian agent! Trump fired the head of the FBI for doing his job with the Russian investigation, then he had the Russians over and ''laughed about it.'' That's not a bi-partisan problem. If Obama did it, he'd be in Supermax now trading cigarettes with the Unabomber! Unabomber. And are you really going to tell me that ''both sides'' are to blame for the state of the enviroment? One party trusts the science on climate change. The other asks "How can the Earth be warming if I'm holding a snowball?" So when you say that both are equally bad, just know that doesn't make you a sage. It's a stupid person's idea of a smart thing to say. It's a cheat. It's a way to pretend you're above it all when you're really just too lazy to tell shit from shinola. And it is the ''central fraudulent idea'' that allowed an outsider like Trump to get elected. It's one step up from "I don't vote." It's like saying "I don't read" makes you smarter. Or "I don't shower" makes you smell good.
