Follow TV Tropes

Following

History Analysis / JunkRare

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Replaced link with general TV Tropes article


(And sometimes you have lead designers who enjoy seeing how much they can get away with]], whose antics periodically break the game in manners that must be incredibly funny to those who are neither fiscally nor emotionally invested in it.)

to:

(And sometimes you have [[TrollingCreator lead designers who enjoy seeing how much they can get away with]], whose antics periodically break the game in manners that must be incredibly funny to those who are neither fiscally nor emotionally invested in it.)
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Removed another dead link


(And sometimes you have [[http://www.wizards.com/magic/magazine/archive.aspx?tag=making%20magic&description=making%20magic lead designers who enjoy seeing how much they can get away with]], whose antics periodically break the game in manners that must be incredibly funny to those who are neither fiscally nor emotionally invested in it.)

to:

(And sometimes you have [[http://www.wizards.com/magic/magazine/archive.aspx?tag=making%20magic&description=making%20magic lead designers who enjoy seeing how much they can get away with]], whose antics periodically break the game in manners that must be incredibly funny to those who are neither fiscally nor emotionally invested in it.)
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Dead link


For an in depth look at why this trope exists, at least in relation to ''TabletopGame/MagicTheGathering'', and probably most other {{Collectible Card Game}}s, please see [[http://www.wizards.com/Magic/Magazine/Article.aspx?x=mtgcom/daily/mr9 this article]].
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


For an in depth look at why this trope exists, at least in relation to ''MagicTheGathering'', and probably most other {{Collectible Card Game}}s, please see [[http://www.wizards.com/Magic/Magazine/Article.aspx?x=mtgcom/daily/mr9 this article]].

to:

For an in depth look at why this trope exists, at least in relation to ''MagicTheGathering'', ''TabletopGame/MagicTheGathering'', and probably most other {{Collectible Card Game}}s, please see [[http://www.wizards.com/Magic/Magazine/Article.aspx?x=mtgcom/daily/mr9 this article]].



Another explanation is that the developers of a collectible game often can't say themselves what will turn out to be good or not good. This is especially the case early in the game's history, when no one -- including its creators -- really understands what makes the game work. The contrast between the cards from the first MagicTheGathering set that are considered powerful now, and those that were considered powerful then, is very instructive.

And sometimes people just make mistakes. MagicTheGathering provided the perfect example of this with the ''Urza's Saga'' block, which was created in order to slow down the game, but produced a Magic World Tour ("Combo Winter," Rome 1998) in which tournament matches were decided by the initial coin toss, because both players' decks could win on turn one.

Sometimes, too, a player shows up at a tournament with a deck built around a card that everyone else thought was worthless, and proceeds to mop the floor with his rivals and send the price and reputation of his key card into the stratosphere. In MagicTheGathering, Necropotence, from the ''Ice Age'' block, is the most famous of these.

to:

Another explanation is that the developers of a collectible game often can't say themselves what will turn out to be good or not good. This is especially the case early in the game's history, when no one -- including its creators -- really understands what makes the game work. The contrast between the cards from the first MagicTheGathering TabletopGame/MagicTheGathering set that are considered powerful now, and those that were considered powerful then, is very instructive.

And sometimes people just make mistakes. MagicTheGathering TabletopGame/MagicTheGathering provided the perfect example of this with the ''Urza's Saga'' block, which was created in order to slow down the game, but produced a Magic World Tour ("Combo Winter," Rome 1998) in which tournament matches were decided by the initial coin toss, because both players' decks could win on turn one.

Sometimes, too, a player shows up at a tournament with a deck built around a card that everyone else thought was worthless, and proceeds to mop the floor with his rivals and send the price and reputation of his key card into the stratosphere. In MagicTheGathering, TabletopGame/MagicTheGathering, Necropotence, from the ''Ice Age'' block, is the most famous of these.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


(And sometimes you have [[http://www.wizards.com/magic/magazine/archive.aspx?tag=making%20magic&description=making%20magic lead designers who enjoy seeing how much they can get away with]], whose antics periodically break the game in manners that must be incredibly funny to those who are neither fiscally nor emotionally invested in it.)

to:

(And sometimes you have [[http://www.wizards.com/magic/magazine/archive.aspx?tag=making%20magic&description=making%20magic lead designers who enjoy seeing how much they can get away with]], whose antics periodically break the game in manners that must be incredibly funny to those who are neither fiscally nor emotionally invested in it.))
----
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Another explanation is that the developers of a collectible game often can't say themselves what will turn out to be good or not so good. This is especially the case early in the game's history, when no one -- including its creators -- really understands what makes the game work. The contrast between the cards from the first MagicTheGathering set that are considered powerful now, and those considered powerful then, is very instructive.

to:

Another explanation is that the developers of a collectible game often can't say themselves what will turn out to be good or not so good. This is especially the case early in the game's history, when no one -- including its creators -- really understands what makes the game work. The contrast between the cards from the first MagicTheGathering set that are considered powerful now, and those that were considered powerful then, is very instructive.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:


[[WMG: R&D is not omniscient]]

Another explanation is that the developers of a collectible game often can't say themselves what will turn out to be good or not so good. This is especially the case early in the game's history, when no one -- including its creators -- really understands what makes the game work. The contrast between the cards from the first MagicTheGathering set that are considered powerful now, and those considered powerful then, is very instructive.

And sometimes people just make mistakes. MagicTheGathering provided the perfect example of this with the ''Urza's Saga'' block, which was created in order to slow down the game, but produced a Magic World Tour ("Combo Winter," Rome 1998) in which tournament matches were decided by the initial coin toss, because both players' decks could win on turn one.

Sometimes, too, a player shows up at a tournament with a deck built around a card that everyone else thought was worthless, and proceeds to mop the floor with his rivals and send the price and reputation of his key card into the stratosphere. In MagicTheGathering, Necropotence, from the ''Ice Age'' block, is the most famous of these.

(And sometimes you have [[http://www.wizards.com/magic/magazine/archive.aspx?tag=making%20magic&description=making%20magic lead designers who enjoy seeing how much they can get away with]], whose antics periodically break the game in manners that must be incredibly funny to those who are neither fiscally nor emotionally invested in it.)
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Actually, cards are usually going to be designed as rare or common.


Once the set is completed, rarity is assigned, and for the reasons above, good cards are spread across all rarities as much as possible. Since the criteria for acceptance as a rare isn't just the card's usefulness, this will naturally lead to some rare cards being useless, or at least so specialized that they are difficult to use effectively.

to:

Once the set is completed, rarity is assigned, and for the reasons above, good Good cards are spread across all rarities as much as possible. Since the criteria for acceptance as a rare isn't just the card's usefulness, this will naturally lead to some rare cards being useless, or at least so specialized that they are difficult to use effectively.
ccoa MOD

Changed: 2

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


For an in depth look at why this trope exists, at least in relation to ''MagicTheGathering'', and probably most other {{Collectable Card Game}}s, please see [[http://www.wizards.com/Magic/Magazine/Article.aspx?x=mtgcom/daily/mr9 this article]].

to:

For an in depth look at why this trope exists, at least in relation to ''MagicTheGathering'', and probably most other {{Collectable {{Collectible Card Game}}s, please see [[http://www.wizards.com/Magic/Magazine/Article.aspx?x=mtgcom/daily/mr9 this article]].
ccoa MOD

Changed: 6

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


For an in depth look at why this trope exists, at least in relation to ''MagicTheGathering'', and probably most other CollectableCardGames, please see [[http://www.wizards.com/Magic/Magazine/Article.aspx?x=mtgcom/daily/mr9 this article]].

to:

For an in depth look at why this trope exists, at least in relation to ''MagicTheGathering'', and probably most other CollectableCardGames, {{Collectable Card Game}}s, please see [[http://www.wizards.com/Magic/Magazine/Article.aspx?x=mtgcom/daily/mr9 this article]].
ccoa MOD

Added: 1020

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

For an in depth look at why this trope exists, at least in relation to ''MagicTheGathering'', and probably most other CollectableCardGames, please see [[http://www.wizards.com/Magic/Magazine/Article.aspx?x=mtgcom/daily/mr9 this article]].

When it comes to collectible games, not all the cards can be equally good. If they were, it would continually up the power level of the game as well as remove the strategic aspect of creating a deck - one of the main draws of the genre. It's also not economical, either for the manufacturer or the players, for only rare cards to be good. In order to hook and maintain the audience, some of the cards must be less valuable or useful.

Once the set is completed, rarity is assigned, and for the reasons above, good cards are spread across all rarities as much as possible. Since the criteria for acceptance as a rare isn't just the card's usefulness, this will naturally lead to some rare cards being useless, or at least so specialized that they are difficult to use effectively.

Top