Follow TV Tropes

Following

History Analysis / FilmiMusic

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


FilmiMusic is the staple of the UsefulNotes/{{India}}n music industry. Virtually every pop song in India is generated via filmi music, such that the entire genre itself is inextricably linked to this. Basically, every pop singer in India has been a playback singer in Bollywood, and the only way they can earn money is through the sale of songs via the sale of movie soundtracks. Filmi music is so dominant, that despite several attempts by various artists in TheEighties, [[TheNineties 90s]], and early [[TheNoughties 2000s]] at creating a separate Indian ('Indi') Pop genre distinct from Bollywood, Indians still overwhelmingly listen to UsefulNotes/{{Bollywood}} movie soundtracks rather than individual pop singers or bands. Therefore, pop singers in India, while having their own respective fan followings, remain dependent on Bollywood studios for publicity, fame, and success, and pop singers do not have the stardom that other pop singers have in the Western world or East Asia.

to:

FilmiMusic is the staple of the UsefulNotes/{{India}}n music industry. Virtually every pop song in India is generated via filmi music, such that the entire genre itself is inextricably linked to this. Basically, every pop singer in India has been a playback singer in Bollywood, and the only way they can earn money is through the sale of songs via the sale of movie soundtracks. Filmi music is so dominant, that despite several attempts by various artists in TheEighties, [[TheNineties The80s, [[The90s 90s]], and early [[TheNoughties 2000s]] at creating a separate Indian ('Indi') Pop genre distinct from Bollywood, Indians still overwhelmingly listen to UsefulNotes/{{Bollywood}} movie soundtracks rather than individual pop singers or bands. Therefore, pop singers in India, while having their own respective fan followings, remain dependent on Bollywood studios for publicity, fame, and success, and pop singers do not have the stardom that other pop singers have in the Western world or East Asia.

Added: 4

Changed: 86

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Filmi music is the staple of the Indian music industry. Virtually every pop song in India is generated via filmi music, such that the entire genre itself is inextricably linked to this. Basically, every pop singer in India has been a playback singer in Bollywood, and the only way they can earn money is through the sale of songs via the sale of movie soundtracks. Filmi music is so dominant, that despite several attempts by various artists in the 80s, 90s and early 2000s at creating a separate Indian ('Indi') Pop genre distinct from Bollywood, Indians still overwhelmingly listen Bollywood movie soundtracks rather than individual pop singers or bands. Therefore, pop singers in India, while having their own respective fan followings, remain dependent on Bollywood studios for publicity, fame and success, and pop singers do not have the stardom that other pop singers have in the Western world or East Asia.

One reason for this is that from its inception, modern day Indian pop music did not have an independent avenue to thrive, unlike the case in the West. While in the West, modern pop music took off with the radio in the early 20th century, which enabled pop singers and musicians to broadcast their talent to a wide audience base, in India, government control over radio prevented pop singers from taking advantage of this medium. Government control over the radio originated in the UsefulNotes/BritishRaj, which only broadcast the news, western entertainment or colonial propaganda. The Raj had a paternalistic approach towards the radio, treating it as a privilege of the British that shouldn’t be 'misused' by Indian nationalists. They would, therefore, deny Indian singers from broadcasting their songs, lest they incite 'disaffection against the British'. This paternalistic approach towards radio broadcasting continued in the early decades of newly Independent India, although for different reasons - it was felt that the radio should broadcast only classical Indian music, instead of low culture pop music, as a way of promoting Indian culture after years of colonial rule. Therefore, Indian singers, unlike Frank Sinatra and Edith Pfiaff, could not rely on the radio to develop their own fan base. An independent (of Bollywood) [[IndiPop pop music scene did take hold briefly]] in the late eighties and early nineties, but died out by the turn of the millennium, with many of its artists being subsumed in Bollywood.

On the other hand, they could sing for Bollywood productions, which invariably had musical numbers or song and dance sequences once sound was adopted by film makers in India. Some of these singers, like Kishore Kumar, could sing and act in films, but eventually, they became playback singers. One reason may have been the fact that many singers, especially female ones, were classically trained vocalists, who had been discouraged from acting or dancing (classical music makes a clear distinction between singers, musicians and dancers, and classical musicians had traditionally looked down upon acting and theatre as demeaning ventures), such that they lacked either the ability or inclination to sing or dance, which was a requirement for any musical. Besides, it was a convenient arrangement for actors, who usually came from various backgrounds in the early days of Bollywood, and lacked singing abilities (although many actresses were expected to have a dancing ability).

to:

Filmi music FilmiMusic is the staple of the Indian UsefulNotes/{{India}}n music industry. Virtually every pop song in India is generated via filmi music, such that the entire genre itself is inextricably linked to this. Basically, every pop singer in India has been a playback singer in Bollywood, and the only way they can earn money is through the sale of songs via the sale of movie soundtracks. Filmi music is so dominant, that despite several attempts by various artists in the 80s, 90s TheEighties, [[TheNineties 90s]], and early 2000s [[TheNoughties 2000s]] at creating a separate Indian ('Indi') Pop genre distinct from Bollywood, Indians still overwhelmingly listen Bollywood to UsefulNotes/{{Bollywood}} movie soundtracks rather than individual pop singers or bands. Therefore, pop singers in India, while having their own respective fan followings, remain dependent on Bollywood studios for publicity, fame fame, and success, and pop singers do not have the stardom that other pop singers have in the Western world or East Asia.

One reason for this is that from its inception, modern day modern-day Indian pop music did not have an independent avenue to thrive, unlike the case in the West. While in the West, modern pop music took off with the radio in the early 20th century, which enabled pop singers and musicians to broadcast their talent to a wide audience base, in India, government control over radio prevented pop singers from taking advantage of this medium. Government control over the radio originated in the UsefulNotes/BritishRaj, which only broadcast the news, western entertainment entertainment, or colonial propaganda. The Raj had a paternalistic approach towards the radio, treating it as a privilege of the British that shouldn’t be 'misused' by Indian nationalists. They would, therefore, deny Indian singers from broadcasting their songs, lest they incite 'disaffection against the British'. This paternalistic approach towards radio broadcasting continued in the early decades of newly Independent India, although for different reasons - it was felt that the radio should broadcast only classical Indian music, instead of low culture pop music, as a way of promoting Indian culture after years of colonial rule. Therefore, Indian singers, unlike Frank Sinatra and Edith Pfiaff, could not rely on the radio to develop their own fan base. An independent (of Bollywood) [[IndiPop pop music scene did take hold briefly]] in the late eighties and early nineties, but died out by the turn of the millennium, with many of its artists being subsumed in Bollywood.

On the other hand, they could sing for Bollywood productions, which invariably had musical numbers or song and dance sequences once sound was adopted by film makers filmmakers in India. Some of these singers, like Kishore Kumar, could sing and act in films, but eventually, they became playback singers. One reason may have been the fact that many singers, especially female ones, were classically trained vocalists, who had been discouraged from acting or dancing (classical music makes a clear distinction between singers, musicians musicians, and dancers, and classical musicians had traditionally looked down upon acting and theatre as demeaning ventures), such that they lacked either the ability or inclination to sing or dance, which was a requirement for any musical. Besides, it was a convenient arrangement for actors, who usually came from various backgrounds in the early days of Bollywood, and lacked singing abilities (although many actresses were expected to have a dancing ability).ability).
----
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


Filmi music is the staple of the Indian music industry. Virtually every pop song in India is generated via filmi music, such that the entire genre itself is inextricably linked to this. Basically, every pop singer in India has been a playback singer in Bollywood, and the only way they can earn money is through the sale of songs via the sale of movie soundtracks. Filmi music is so dominant, that despite several attempts by various artists in the 80s, 90s and early 2000s at creating a separate Indian ('Indie') Pop genre distinct from Bollywood, Indians still overwhelmingly listen Bollywood movie soundtracks rather than individual pop singers or bands. Therefore, pop singers in India, while having their own respective fan followings, remain dependent on Bollywood studios for publicity, fame and success, and pop singers do not have the stardom that other pop singers have in the Western world or East Asia.

to:

Filmi music is the staple of the Indian music industry. Virtually every pop song in India is generated via filmi music, such that the entire genre itself is inextricably linked to this. Basically, every pop singer in India has been a playback singer in Bollywood, and the only way they can earn money is through the sale of songs via the sale of movie soundtracks. Filmi music is so dominant, that despite several attempts by various artists in the 80s, 90s and early 2000s at creating a separate Indian ('Indie') ('Indi') Pop genre distinct from Bollywood, Indians still overwhelmingly listen Bollywood movie soundtracks rather than individual pop singers or bands. Therefore, pop singers in India, while having their own respective fan followings, remain dependent on Bollywood studios for publicity, fame and success, and pop singers do not have the stardom that other pop singers have in the Western world or East Asia.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


One reason for this is that from its inception, modern day Indian pop music did not have an independent avenue to thrive, unlike the case in the West. While in the West, modern pop music took off with the radio in the early 20th century, which enabled pop singers and musicians to broadcast their talent to a wide audience base, in India, government control over radio prevented pop singers from taking advantage of this medium. Government control over the radio originated in the [[British Raj]], which only broadcasted only the news, western entertainment, colonial propaganda. The Raj had a paternalistic approach towards the radio, treating as either the privilege of the British or a tool that could be 'misused' by Indian nationalists. They would, therefore, deny Indian singers from broadcasting their songs, being afraid that they might incite 'disaffection against the British'. This paternalistic approach towards radio broadcasting continued in the early decades of newly Independent India, although for different reasons- it was felt that the radio should broadcast only classical Indian music, and low culture pop music, as a way of promoting Indian culture after years of colonial rule. Therefore, Indian singers, unlike Frank Sinatra and Edith Pfiaff, could not rely on the radio to develop their own fan base. An independent (of Bollywood) [[IndiPop pop music scene did take hold briefly]] in the late eighties and early nineties, but died out by the turn of the millennium, with many of its artists being subsumed in Bollywood.

to:

One reason for this is that from its inception, modern day Indian pop music did not have an independent avenue to thrive, unlike the case in the West. While in the West, modern pop music took off with the radio in the early 20th century, which enabled pop singers and musicians to broadcast their talent to a wide audience base, in India, government control over radio prevented pop singers from taking advantage of this medium. Government control over the radio originated in the [[British Raj]], UsefulNotes/BritishRaj, which only broadcasted only broadcast the news, western entertainment, entertainment or colonial propaganda. The Raj had a paternalistic approach towards the radio, treating it as either the a privilege of the British or a tool that could shouldn’t be 'misused' by Indian nationalists. They would, therefore, deny Indian singers from broadcasting their songs, being afraid that lest they might incite 'disaffection against the British'. This paternalistic approach towards radio broadcasting continued in the early decades of newly Independent India, although for different reasons- reasons - it was felt that the radio should broadcast only classical Indian music, and instead of low culture pop music, as a way of promoting Indian culture after years of colonial rule. Therefore, Indian singers, unlike Frank Sinatra and Edith Pfiaff, could not rely on the radio to develop their own fan base. An independent (of Bollywood) [[IndiPop pop music scene did take hold briefly]] in the late eighties and early nineties, but died out by the turn of the millennium, with many of its artists being subsumed in Bollywood.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


One reason for this is that from its inception, modern day Indian pop music did not have an independent avenue to thrive, unlike the case in the West. While in the West, modern pop music took off with the radio in the early 20th century, which enabled pop singers and musicians to broadcast their talent to a wide audience base, in India, government control over radio prevented pop singers from taking advantage of this medium. Government control over the radio originated in the [[British Raj]], which only broadcasted only the news, western entertainment, colonial propaganda. The Raj had a paternalistic approach towards the radio, treating as either the privilege of the British or a tool that could be 'misused' by Indian nationalists. They would, therefore, deny Indian singers from broadcasting their songs, being afraid that they might incite 'disaffection against the British'. This paternalistic approach towards radio broadcasting continued in the early decades of newly Independent India, although for different reasons- it was felt that the radio should broadcast only classical Indian music, and low culture pop music, as a way of promoting Indian culture after years of colonial rule. Therefore, Indian singers, unlike Frank Sinatra and Edith Pfiaff, could not rely on the radio to develop their own fan base. An independent (of Bollywood) [[Music/IndiPop pop music scene did take hold briefly]] in the late eighties and early nineties, but died out by the turn of the millennium, with many of its artists being subsumed in Bollywood.

to:

One reason for this is that from its inception, modern day Indian pop music did not have an independent avenue to thrive, unlike the case in the West. While in the West, modern pop music took off with the radio in the early 20th century, which enabled pop singers and musicians to broadcast their talent to a wide audience base, in India, government control over radio prevented pop singers from taking advantage of this medium. Government control over the radio originated in the [[British Raj]], which only broadcasted only the news, western entertainment, colonial propaganda. The Raj had a paternalistic approach towards the radio, treating as either the privilege of the British or a tool that could be 'misused' by Indian nationalists. They would, therefore, deny Indian singers from broadcasting their songs, being afraid that they might incite 'disaffection against the British'. This paternalistic approach towards radio broadcasting continued in the early decades of newly Independent India, although for different reasons- it was felt that the radio should broadcast only classical Indian music, and low culture pop music, as a way of promoting Indian culture after years of colonial rule. Therefore, Indian singers, unlike Frank Sinatra and Edith Pfiaff, could not rely on the radio to develop their own fan base. An independent (of Bollywood) [[Music/IndiPop [[IndiPop pop music scene did take hold briefly]] in the late eighties and early nineties, but died out by the turn of the millennium, with many of its artists being subsumed in Bollywood.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


One reason for this is that from its inception, modern day Indian pop music did not have an independent avenue to thrive, unlike the case in the West. While in the West, modern pop music took off with the radio in the early 20th century, which enabled pop singers and musicians to broadcast their talent to a wide audience base, in India, government control over radio prevented pop singers from taking advantage of this medium. Government control over the radio originated in the [[British Raj]], which only broadcasted only the news, western entertainment, colonial propaganda. The Raj had a paternalistic approach towards the radio, treating as either the privilege of the British or a tool that could be 'misused' by Indian nationalists. They would, therefore, deny Indian singers from broadcasting their songs, being afraid that they might incite 'disaffection against the British'. This paternalistic approach towards radio broadcasting continued in the early decades of newly Independent India, although for different reasons- it was felt that the radio should broadcast only classical Indian music, and low culture pop music, as a way of promoting Indian culture after years of colonial rule. Therefore, Indian singers, unlike Frank Sinatra and Edith Pfiaff, could not rely on the radio to develop their own fan base.

to:

One reason for this is that from its inception, modern day Indian pop music did not have an independent avenue to thrive, unlike the case in the West. While in the West, modern pop music took off with the radio in the early 20th century, which enabled pop singers and musicians to broadcast their talent to a wide audience base, in India, government control over radio prevented pop singers from taking advantage of this medium. Government control over the radio originated in the [[British Raj]], which only broadcasted only the news, western entertainment, colonial propaganda. The Raj had a paternalistic approach towards the radio, treating as either the privilege of the British or a tool that could be 'misused' by Indian nationalists. They would, therefore, deny Indian singers from broadcasting their songs, being afraid that they might incite 'disaffection against the British'. This paternalistic approach towards radio broadcasting continued in the early decades of newly Independent India, although for different reasons- it was felt that the radio should broadcast only classical Indian music, and low culture pop music, as a way of promoting Indian culture after years of colonial rule. Therefore, Indian singers, unlike Frank Sinatra and Edith Pfiaff, could not rely on the radio to develop their own fan base. \n An independent (of Bollywood) [[Music/IndiPop pop music scene did take hold briefly]] in the late eighties and early nineties, but died out by the turn of the millennium, with many of its artists being subsumed in Bollywood.

Added: 977

Changed: 128

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


One reason for this is that from its inception, modern day Indian pop music did not have an independent avenue to thrive, unlike the case in the West. While in the West, modern pop music took off with the radio in the early 20th century, which enabled pop singers and musicians to broadcast their talent to a wide audience base, in India, government control over radio prevented pop singers from taking advantage of this medium. Government control over the radio originated in the [[British Raj]], which only broadcasted only the news, western entertainment, colonial propaganda. The Raj had a paternalistic approach towards the radio, treating as either the privilege of the British or a tool that could be 'misused' by Indiannationalists. They would, therefore, deny Indian singers from broadcasting their songs, being afraid that they might incite 'disaffection against the British'. This paternalistic approach towards radio broadcasting continued in the early decades of newly Independent India, although for different reasons- it was felt that the radio should broadcast only classical Indian music, and low culture pop music, as a way of promoting Indian culture after years of colonial rule

to:

One reason for this is that from its inception, modern day Indian pop music did not have an independent avenue to thrive, unlike the case in the West. While in the West, modern pop music took off with the radio in the early 20th century, which enabled pop singers and musicians to broadcast their talent to a wide audience base, in India, government control over radio prevented pop singers from taking advantage of this medium. Government control over the radio originated in the [[British Raj]], which only broadcasted only the news, western entertainment, colonial propaganda. The Raj had a paternalistic approach towards the radio, treating as either the privilege of the British or a tool that could be 'misused' by Indiannationalists.Indian nationalists. They would, therefore, deny Indian singers from broadcasting their songs, being afraid that they might incite 'disaffection against the British'. This paternalistic approach towards radio broadcasting continued in the early decades of newly Independent India, although for different reasons- it was felt that the radio should broadcast only classical Indian music, and low culture pop music, as a way of promoting Indian culture after years of colonial rulerule. Therefore, Indian singers, unlike Frank Sinatra and Edith Pfiaff, could not rely on the radio to develop their own fan base.

On the other hand, they could sing for Bollywood productions, which invariably had musical numbers or song and dance sequences once sound was adopted by film makers in India. Some of these singers, like Kishore Kumar, could sing and act in films, but eventually, they became playback singers. One reason may have been the fact that many singers, especially female ones, were classically trained vocalists, who had been discouraged from acting or dancing (classical music makes a clear distinction between singers, musicians and dancers, and classical musicians had traditionally looked down upon acting and theatre as demeaning ventures), such that they lacked either the ability or inclination to sing or dance, which was a requirement for any musical. Besides, it was a convenient arrangement for actors, who usually came from various backgrounds in the early days of Bollywood, and lacked singing abilities (although many actresses were expected to have a dancing ability).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

Filmi music is the staple of the Indian music industry. Virtually every pop song in India is generated via filmi music, such that the entire genre itself is inextricably linked to this. Basically, every pop singer in India has been a playback singer in Bollywood, and the only way they can earn money is through the sale of songs via the sale of movie soundtracks. Filmi music is so dominant, that despite several attempts by various artists in the 80s, 90s and early 2000s at creating a separate Indian ('Indie') Pop genre distinct from Bollywood, Indians still overwhelmingly listen Bollywood movie soundtracks rather than individual pop singers or bands. Therefore, pop singers in India, while having their own respective fan followings, remain dependent on Bollywood studios for publicity, fame and success, and pop singers do not have the stardom that other pop singers have in the Western world or East Asia.

One reason for this is that from its inception, modern day Indian pop music did not have an independent avenue to thrive, unlike the case in the West. While in the West, modern pop music took off with the radio in the early 20th century, which enabled pop singers and musicians to broadcast their talent to a wide audience base, in India, government control over radio prevented pop singers from taking advantage of this medium. Government control over the radio originated in the [[British Raj]], which only broadcasted only the news, western entertainment, colonial propaganda. The Raj had a paternalistic approach towards the radio, treating as either the privilege of the British or a tool that could be 'misused' by Indiannationalists. They would, therefore, deny Indian singers from broadcasting their songs, being afraid that they might incite 'disaffection against the British'. This paternalistic approach towards radio broadcasting continued in the early decades of newly Independent India, although for different reasons- it was felt that the radio should broadcast only classical Indian music, and low culture pop music, as a way of promoting Indian culture after years of colonial rule

Top