History Analysis / Elementary

Like many Watsons before and after, Joan acts as an AudienceSurrogate. But instead of assuming the audience are all straight, white men, she is the audience stand in for women, feminists and people of colour. She calls Sherlock on his bullshit, she doesn't hold him up on a pedestal, and while she grows to respect him, she does not worship him. As Joan and Sherlock's relationship matures and evolves, the audience's loyalty is earned steadily over the season, through building up a strong friendship and positive representation; its feminist themes, diverse characters and valuing character development doesn't hurt.

Like many Watsons before and after, Joan acts as an AudienceSurrogate. But instead of assuming the audience are all straight, white men, she is the audience stand in for women, feminists and people of colour. She calls Sherlock on his bullshit, she doesn't hold him up on a pedestal, she grows to respect him, but does not worship him. As Joan and Sherlock's relationship matures and evolves, the audience's loyalty is earned steadily over the season, through building up a strong friendship and positive representation; its feminist themes, diverse characters and valuing character development doesn't hurt.

Like many Watsons before and many Watsons after, Joan acts as an AudienceSurrogate. But instead of assuming the audience are all straight, white men, she is the audience stand in for women, feminists and people of colour. She calls Sherlock on his bullshit, she doesn't hold him up on a pedestal, she grows to respect him, but does not worship him. As Joan and Sherlock's relationship matures and evolves, the audience's loyalty is earned steadily over the season, through building up a strong friendship and positive representation; its feminist themes, diverse characters and valuing character development doesn't hurt.

Elementary has been compared to an AU fanfic, born from the desire to see a more of a diverse, progressive representation.

This leads us to the GenderFlip and CompositeCharacter or Moriarty/Adler. The struggle between Moriarty and Holmes is another tale of the battle of wits between super-intelligent white men, with women's bodies littered around them. In the 2009 films and the BBC series, Irene is robbed of her agency. She becomes a chesspiece for Moriarty and both Adlers are ultimately beat by their feeling for Sherlock. This Moriarty sees her beat, again, by her feelings - but not by Sherlock. Her love for Sherlock and Sherlock's love for her puts them into a stalemate. It is ''Joan Watson'' who claims the ultimate victory over Moriarty.

Joan, as an Asian woman, former surgeon, former sober companion and novice detective, is often underestimated personally and professionally by the show's characters, Sherlock itself (in the beginning), the NYPD, her family and friends and the antagonists of the week. In response to that, she has self-esteem issues and is unsure of her own abilities when she is often right. [[ArchEnemy Moriarty]], ignoring her importance and her intelligence, understimates her as well, even calling her a 'mascot'. The DramaticIrony of it al is that Joan is the only one who was able to understand Moriarty's motivations and create a plan to capture her.

In comparison, this Sherlock Holmes is no less canon than Creator/TheBBC's AntiHero [[Series/{{Sherlock}} with a god-complex]] [[note]] in case you think I'm being deliberately critical about this Holmes; Moffat himself said that this version of Sherlock thinks himself as a man trying to be a God.[[/note]], or Creator/HayaoMiyazaki's [[Anime/SherlockHound crime-solving dogs]], or Creator/GuyRitchie's [[Film/SherlockHolmes2009 guile action hero]]. Yet, setting it in UsefulNotes/NewYorkCity rather than Victorian London has somehow forever tainted the canon beyond recognition.

To start with is the myth of Franchise/SherlockHolmes himself. As a PublicDomain character born in a time of choppy copyright laws, he has been referenced, crossed over, cameo'd, retconned and parodied to beyond recognition even during his own time. He's fought Nazis, thieves, UsefulNotes/JackTheRipper, {{Eldritch Abomination}}s and dinosaurs; his characterisation changes so much in each adaptation that you can argue he has become a mythological figure. He has a set of traits and character quirks, but otherwise is also as adaptable and as flexible as any character from fairy tales or ancient mythology. If the collected Holmeses and Watsons passed each other in the street, they would hardly recognise their counterparts. Perhaps that's what makes Holmes so prevalent to adaptation; a well-known canon that seen reinterpretation again and again and a hero that has leaves enough gaps to be re-imagined. From films to {{PerspectiveFlip}}ped fanfic, the original Strand stories have been told and retold through so many different mediums that remaking it differently is now a default.

To start with is the myth of Franchise/SherlockHolmes himself. As a PublicDomain character born in a time of choppy copyright laws, he has been referenced, crossed over, cameo'd, retconned and parodied to beyond recognition even during his own time. He's fought Nazis, thieves, UsefulNotes/JackTheRipper, EldritchAbomination and dinosaurs; his characterisation changes so much in each adaptation that you can argue he has become a mythological figure. He has a set of traits and character quirks, but otherwise is also as adaptable and as flexible as any character from fairy tales or ancient mythology. If the collected Holmeses and Watsons passed each other in the street, they would hardly recognise their counterparts. Perhaps that's what makes Holmes so prevalent to adaptation; a well-known canon that seen reinterpretation again and again and a hero that has leaves enough gaps to be re-imagined. From films to {{PerspectiveFlip}}ped fanfic, the original Strand stories have been told and retold through so many different mediums that remaking it differently is now a default.

''Elementary'' has been described by critics as a subversive approach to the Holmes canon, but its unorthodox nature has many purists up in arms about its casting, setting, and procedural format. However, the show has a complex relationship with its audience in how it treats them. More favourable critics often mention how it plays with old narrative devices found not only in the books themselves but also in its adaptations. So, let's examine this, shall we? '''Unmarked spoilers below.'''

Several canon purists refuse to see the merit in this show - and some refuse to acknowledge it as an adaptation altogether - because it's so far gone from the original canon; but that may be the whole point. Adaptations have used and reused ACD's old tropes and worn them out to the point of exhaustion. Brilliant white men solving crime, disregarding the rules of lesser mortals simply by the virtue that they are brilliant. He is, after all, the archetype many {{Great Detective}}s are based upon, from ''Series/{{Monk}}'' to ''Franchise/{{Batman}}'' to ''Manga/DetectiveConan''.

We can easily see the show as a deconstruction of TheWatson trope, bringing TheLancer to the position of {{Protagonist}} and Sherlock being the one who explains her plan to the audience.

In comparison, this Sherlock Holmes is no less canon than Creator/TheBBC's AntiHero [[Series/{{Sherlock}} with a god-complex]] [[note]] in case you think I'm being deliberately critical about this Holmes; Moffat himself said that this version of Sherlock thinks himself as a man trying to be a God.[[/note]], or Creator/HayaoMiyazaki's [[Anime/SherlockHound crime-solving dogs]], or Creator/GuyRitchie's [[Film/SherlockHolmes guile action hero]]. Yet, setting it in UsefulNotes/NewYorkCity rather than Victorian London has somehow forever tainted the canon beyond recognition.

-> ''"And what does NapoleonBonaparte have anything to do with it?"''
To start with is the myth of Franchise/SherlockHolmes himself. As a PublicDomain character born in a time of choppy copyright laws, he has been referenced, crossed over, cameo'd, retconned and parodied to beyond recognition even during his own time. He's fought Nazis, thieves, JackTheRipper, EldritchAbomination and dinosaurs; his characterisation changes so much in each adaptation that you can argue he has become a mythological figure. He has a set of traits and character quirks, but otherwise is also as adaptable and as flexible as any character from fairy tales or ancient mythology. If the collected Holmeses and Watsons passed each other in the street, they would hardly recognise their counterparts. Perhaps that's what makes Holmes so prevalent to adaptation; a well-known canon that seen reinterpretation again and again and a hero that has leaves enough gaps to be re-imagined. From films to {{PerspectiveFlip}}ped fanfic, the original Strand stories have been told and retold through so many different mediums that remaking it differently is now a default.

In comparison, this Sherlock Holmes is no less canon than BBC's AntiHero with a god-complex [[note]] in case you think I'm being deliberately critical about this Holmes; Moffat himself said that this version of Sherlock thinks himself as a man trying to be a God.[[/note]], or Creator/HayaoMiyazaki's [[Anime/SherlockHound crime-solving dogs]], or Creator/GuyRitchie's [[Film/SherlockHolmes guile action hero]]. Yet, setting it in UsefulNotes/NewYorkCity rather than Victorian London has somehow forever tainted the canon beyond recognition.

In comparison, this Sherlock Holmes is no less canon than BBC's AntiHero with a god-complex [[note]] in case you think I'm being deliberately critical about this Holmes; Moffat himself said that this version of Sherlock thinks himself as a man trying to be a God.[[/note]], or Creator/HayaoMiyazaki's crime-solving dogs, or Guy Ritchie's guile action hero. Yet, setting it in UsefulNotes/NewYorkCity rather than Victorian London has somehow forever tainted the canon beyond recognition.

Like many Watsons before and many Watsons after, Joan acts as an AudienceSurrogate. But instead of assuming the audience are all straight, white men, she is the audience stand in for women, feminists and people of colour. She calls Sherlock on his bullshit, she doesn't hold him up on a pedestal, she grows to respect him, but does not worship him. As Joan and Sherlock's relationship matures and evolves, the audience's loyalty is earned steadily over the season, through building up a strong friendship and positive representation; its feminist themes, diverse characters and valuing character development doesn't hurt.

In comparison, this Sherlock Holmes is no less canon than BBC's AntiHero with a god-complex [[note]] in case you think I'm being deliberately critical about this Holmes; Moffat himself said that this version of Sherlock thinks himself as a man trying to be a God.[[/note]], or Creator/HayaoMiyazaki's crime-solving dogs, or Guy Ritchie's guile action hero. Yet, setting it in NewYorkCity rather than Victorian London has somehow forever tainted the canon beyond recognition.

Several canon purists refuse to see the merit in this show - and some refuse to acknowledge it as an adaptation altogether - because it's so far gone from the original canon; but that may be the whole point. Adaptations have used and reused ACD's old tropes and worn them out to the point of exhaustion. Brilliant white men solving crime, disregarding the rules of lesser mortals simply by the virtue that they are brilliant. He is, after all, the archetype many {{Great Detective}}s are based upon, from {{Monk}} to Franchise/{{Batman}} to {{DetectiveConan}}.

In comparison, this Sherlock Holmes is no less canon than BBC's AntiHero with a god-complex [[note]] in case you think I'm being deliberately critical about this Holmes; Moffat himself said that this version of Sherlock thinks himself as a man trying to be a God.[[/note]], or HayaoMiyazaki's crime-solving dogs, or Guy Ritchie's guile action hero. Yet, setting it in NewYorkCity rather than Victorian London has somehow forever tainted the canon beyond recognition.

!! Irene Adler and Moriarty
->''"As if men had a monopoly on murder."''

In terms of narrative device, I'm keeping these two characters separate. The first notable character to mention is Irene Adler, and how her storyline is handled; she is, after all, the catalysis for the plot, the ghost lingering throughout season one. She starts off as a StuffedInTheFridge PosthumousCharacter, with her only relevance to the story reduced to add some [[DeathByOriginStory backstory mystery]] and give Sherlock something to angst about. Then in the course of two episodes she's found alive, but very broken, then an agent of Moriarty, then it turns out she ''is'' Moriarty. Irene's character not only exploits and deconstructs the StuffedInTheFridge trope, she ''weaponises'' it. She exploits Sherlock's heroic angst for all its worth, setting him on a wild goose chase on M and removing him as an obstacle in one go. This is a brilliant way to turn a rather cheap and overused storytelling device on its head and subvert it - especially as most victims on the trope's page are women, who have to die to trigger the (often white, often male) hero's angst. But just like Moriarty well-crafted grift, the show conned us along with Sherlock into believing in this trope.

This leads us to the GenderFlip and CompositeCharacter or Moriarty/Adler. The struggle between Moriarty and Holmes is another tale of the battle of wits between super-intelligent white men, with women's bodies littered around them. In the 2009 films and the BBC series, Irene is robbed of her agency. She becomes a chesspiece for Moriarty and both Adlers are ultimately beat by their feeling for Sherlock. This Moriarty sees her beat, again, by her feelings - but not by Sherlock. Her love for Sherlock and Sherlock's love for her puts them into a stalemate. It is ''Joan Watson'' who claims the ultimate victory over Moriarty.

We can easily see the show as a deconstruction of TheWatson trope, bringing {{Sidekick}}, {{Foil}} and TheLancer to the postion of SupportingProtagonist or even {{Deuteragonist}}.

Joan, as an Asian woman, former surgeon, former sober companion and novice detective, is often underestimated personally and professionally by the show's characters, Sherlock itself (in the beginning), the NYPD, her family and friends and the antagonists of the week. In response to that, she has self-esteem issues and is unsure of her own abilities when she is often right about her ideas and opinions.

[[ArchEnemy Moriarty]], ignoring her importance in universe and her intelligence, understimates her as well, even calling her a 'mascot'. The DramaticIrony of it al is that Joan is the only one who were able to understand Moriarty's motivations and create a plan to capture her, which leaves the villain in shock.

The 'mascot' comment is also a nod to how often people of colour are reduced to TokenMinority; just see the MagicalNegro and MagicalAsian tropes. They exist on the sidelines to help the hero along, but rarely have enough motive, backstory or agency actually participate in the plot; this gives Joan's defeat of Moriarty so much more poetic satisfaction.

More than that, the show counts on Joan being underestimated. Just like every episode has an [[TheButlerDidIt overlooked]] [[TheDogWasTheMastermind minor]] [[ChekhovsGunman character]] who turns out to be the murderer, the audience isn't supposed to see Joan's victory coming either.

Several canon purists refuse to see the merit in this show - and some refuse to acknowledge it as an adaptation altogether - because it's so far gone from the original canon; but that may be the whole point. Adaptations have used and reused ACD's old tropes and worn them out to the point of exhaustion. Brilliant white men solving crime, disregarding the rules of lesser mortals simply by the virtue that they are brilliant. He is, after all, the archetype many {{Great Detective}}s are based upon, from {{Monk}} to {{Batman}} to {{DetectiveConan}}.

We can easily see the show as a deconstruction of TheWatson trope, bringing TheSidekick, TheFoil and TheLancer to the postion of SupportingProtagonist or even {{Deuteragonist}}.

Joan, as an Asian woman and novice detective, is often underestimated by the show's antagonist of the week. What comes as a shock for Moriarty, what becomes the ultimate knife-twist, is that she was defeated by someone lesser than her; a 'mascot'.
The 'mascot' comment is also a nod to how often people of colour are reduced to TokenMinority; just see the MagicalNegro and MagicalAsian tropes. They exist on the sidelines to help the hero along, but rarely have enough motive, backstory or agency actually participate in the plot; this gives Joan's defeat of Moriarty so much more poetic satisfaction. More than that, the show counts on Joan being underestimated. Just like every episode has an [[TheButlerDidIt overlooked]] [[TheDogWasTheMastermind minor]] [[ChekhovsGunman character]] who turns out to be the murderer, the audience isn't supposed to see Joan's victory coming either.

Like many Watsons before and many Watsons after, Joan acts as an AudienceSurrogate. But instead of assuming the audience are all straight, white men, she is the audience stand in for women, feminists and people of colour. She calls Sherlock on his bullshit, she doesn't hold him up on a pedestal, she grows to respect him, but does not worship him. As Joan and Sherlock's relationship matures and evolves, the audience's loyalty is earned steadily over the season, through building up a strong friendship and positive representation; its feminist themes, diverse characters and valuing character development doesn't hurt.


!! The Mythology
-> ''"And what does NapoleonBonaparte have anything to do with it?"''

One last note wrapping this up is the myth of Franchise/SherlockHolmes himself. As a PublicDomain character born in a time of choppy copyright laws, he has been referenced, crossed over, cameo'd, retconned and parodied to beyond recognition even during his own time. He's fought Nazis, thieves, JackTheRipper, EldritchAbomination and dinosaurs; his characterisation changes so much in each adaptation that you can argue he has become a mythological figure. He has a set of traits and character quirks, but otherwise is also as adaptable and as flexible as any character from fairy tales or ancient mythology. If the collected Holmeses and Watsons passed each other in the street, they would hardly recognise their counterparts. Perhaps that's what makes Holmes so prevalent to adaptation; a well-known canon that seen reinterpretation again and again and a hero that has leaves enough gaps to be re-imagined. From films to {{PerspectiveFlip}}ped fanfic, the original Strand stories have been told and retold through so many different mediums that remaking it differently is now a default.

Several canon purists refuse to see the merit in this show - and some refuse to acknowledge it as an adaptation altogether - because it's so far gone from the original canon; but that may be the whole point. Adaptations have used and reused ACD's old tropes and worn them out to the point of exhaustion. Brilliant white men solving crime, disregarding the rules of lesser mortals simply by the virtue that they are brilliant. He is, after all, the archetype many {{Great Detective}}s are based upon, from {{Monk}} to {{Batman}} to {{DetectiveConan}}.

In comparison, this Sherlock Holmes is no less canon than BBC's AntiHero with a god-complex [[note]] in case you think I'm being deliberately critical about this Holmes; Moffat himself said that this version of Sherlock thinks himself as a man trying to be a God.[[/note]], or HayaoMiyazaki's crime-solving dogs, or Guy Ritchie's guile action hero. Yet, setting it in NewYorkCity rather than Victorian London has somehow forever tainted the canon beyond recognition.

In terms of narrative device, I'm keeping these two characters separate. The first notable character to mention is Irene Adler, and how her storyline is handled; she is, after all, the catalysis for the plot, the ghost lingering throughout season one. She starts off as a StuffedInTheFridge PosthumousCharacter, with her only relevance to the story reduced to add some [[DeathByOriginStory backstory mystery]] and give Sherlock something to angst about. Then in the course of two episodes she's found alive, but very broken, then an agent of Moriarty, then it turns out she ''is'' Moriarty. Irene's character not only exploits and deconstructs the StuffedInTheFridge trope, she ''weaponises'' it. She exploits Sherlock's heroic angst for all its worth, setting him on a wild goose chase and removing him as an obstacle in one go. This is a brilliant way to turn a rather cheap and overused storytelling device on its head and subvert it - especially as most victims on the trope's page are women who have to die to trigger the (often white, often male) hero's angst. But just like Moriarty well-crafted grift, the show conned us along with Sherlock into believing in this trope.

This leads us to the GenderFlip and CompositeCharacter. The struggle between Moriarty and Holmes is another tale of the battle of wits between super-intelligent white men, with women's bodies littered around them. In the 2009 films and the BBC series, Irene is robbed of her agency. She becomes a chesspiece for Moriarty and both Adlers are ultimately beat by their feeling for Sherlock. This Moriarty sees her beat, again, by her feelings - but not by Sherlock. Her love for Sherlock and Sherlock's love for her puts them into a stalemate. It is ''Joan Watson'' who claims the ultimate victory over Moriarty.

Elementary is comparable to an AU fanfic, born from the desire to see a more of a diverse, progressive representation.

Like many Watsons before and many Watsons after, Joan acts as an AudienceSurrogate. But instead of assuming the audience are all straight, white men, she is the audience stand in for women, feminists and people of colour. She calls Sherlock on his bullshit, she doesn't hold him up on a pedestal, she grows to respect him, but does not worship him. As Joan and Sherlock's relationship matures and evolves, the audience's loyalty is earned steadily over the season, through building up a strong friendship and positive representation; its feminist themes, diverse characters and valuing character development doesn't harm.