Follow TV Tropes

Following

History AdaptationExplanationExtrication / LiveActionFilms

Go To

OR

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ''Film/Annihilation2018'': The expedition team is [[ImprobablyFemaleCast made up entirely of women]] for no apparent reason. In [[Literature/TheSouthernReachTrilogy the book]] it’s revealed that the Southern Reach deliberately arranged the team that way to introduce yet another variable into their experiments with the Shimmer, which is also why most of the members are scientists and why the previous expeditions had similarly odd rosters; they’re not expected to stop the Shimmer, [[UnwittingTestSubject they’re sent there to help the Reach learn its capabilities and behavior]]. The movie excises this ([[AdaptedOut along with almost everything else that happens with the Reach during the trip]]), with the result that the military seems to send a group of [[NonActionGuy untrained]] scientists charging into a lethal EldritchLocation just because.

to:

* ''Film/Annihilation2018'': The expedition team is [[ImprobablyFemaleCast made up entirely of women]] for no apparent reason. In [[Literature/TheSouthernReachTrilogy the book]] it’s revealed that the Southern Reach deliberately arranged the team that way to introduce yet another variable into their experiments with the Shimmer, which is also why most of the members are scientists and why the previous expeditions had similarly odd rosters; rosters: they’re not expected to stop the Shimmer, Shimmer; [[UnwittingTestSubject they’re sent there to help the Reach learn its capabilities and behavior]]. The movie excises this ([[AdaptedOut along with almost everything else that happens with the Reach during the trip]]), with the result that the military seems to send a group of [[NonActionGuy untrained]] scientists charging into a lethal EldritchLocation just because.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* ''Film/PresumedInnocent'': Two examples. A reference is made to the "Night Saints", with both Sabich and Lipranzer then interrogating a man who is one. It isn't explained who they are, nor what connection Sabich has with them, while in the book it's said they were a street gang he broke up with a successful prosecution. They also identify Larren Little due to the man's reference toward him as "Judge Motherfucker". Again, this isn't explained. The book related that he got this nickname due to a joke in court once claiming that "motherfucker" was a term of endearment among black people. A viewer who hasn't read the book will likely be left no idea what either of these means.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* In ''Film/{{Cinderella 2015}}'', Gus Gus retains his name from [[Disney/{{Cinderella}} the animated film]], but no mention is given of his real name "Octavius," from which Augustus/Gus is a nickname of.

to:

* In ''Film/{{Cinderella 2015}}'', Gus Gus retains his name from [[Disney/{{Cinderella}} [[WesternAnimation/{{Cinderella}} the animated film]], but no mention is given of his real name "Octavius," from which Augustus/Gus is a nickname of.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Some viewers might wonder why everyone in Oz seems to accept the Wizard as the ruler of the Emerald City so casually, since he's an outsider who wasn't even born in Oz, and there must have been someone else ruling the Emerald City before he dropped in. For that matter, his departure can cause a bit of FridgeHorror when you think about the fact that he's essentially leaving a ''power vacuum'' in the capital of Oz, with no apparent plans to appoint a successor. The novel (and its sequels) explained both points: he named the Scarecrow as his successor before he left Oz, and it was later revealed that the previous ruler of Oz was a benevolent king named Pastoria who died shortly before the Wizard arrived, while his daughter Princess Ozma mysteriously vanished soon afterward. [[note]] The TwistEnding of ''Literature/TheMarvelousLandOfOz'' reveals that Ozma had her memories erased by an evil witch named Mombi, who transformed her into a young boy named "Tip" to hide her identity. Once Tip is unmasked as Ozma and turned back, she assumes the throne in the Emerald City again.[[/note]]

to:

** Some viewers might wonder why everyone in Oz seems to accept the Wizard as the ruler of the Emerald City so casually, since he's an outsider who wasn't even born in Oz, and there must have been someone else ruling the Emerald City before he dropped in. For that matter, his departure can cause a bit of FridgeHorror when you think about the fact that he's essentially leaving a ''power vacuum'' in the capital of Oz, with no apparent plans to appoint a successor. The novel (and its sequels) explained both points: he named the Scarecrow as his successor before he left Oz, and it was later revealed that the previous ruler of Oz was a benevolent king named Pastoria who died shortly before the Wizard arrived, while his daughter Princess Ozma mysteriously vanished soon afterward. [[note]] The TwistEnding of ''Literature/TheMarvelousLandOfOz'' reveals that Ozma had her memories erased was kidnapped by the Wizard and given to an evil witch named Mombi, who transformed her into a young boy named "Tip" to hide her identity. Once Tip is unmasked as Ozma and turned back, she assumes the throne in the Emerald City again.[[/note]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Early in ''Literature/PercyJacksonAndTheLightningThief'', it's mentioned that Percy's sword, Riptide, is enchanted to always return to his pocket in the event that he drops or loses it, an explanation that was left out of the two film adaptations. However, the second film still includes a moment where, after being captured by Luke, he works the pen out of his pocket and uses it to escape his bonds, making it seem as though Luke tied him up without disarming him.

to:

* Early in ''Literature/PercyJacksonAndTheLightningThief'', ''[[Literature/PercyJacksonandtheOlympians The Lightning Thief]]'', it's mentioned that Percy's sword, Riptide, is enchanted to always return to his pocket in the event that he drops or loses it, an explanation that was left out of the two film adaptations. However, the second film still includes a moment where, after being captured by Luke, he works the pen out of his pocket and uses it to escape his bonds, making it seem as though Luke tied him up without disarming him.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* Early in ''Literature/TheLightningThief'', it's mentioned that Percy's sword, Riptide, is enchanted to always return to his pocket in the event that he drops or loses it, an explanation that was left out of the two film adaptations. However, the second film still includes a moment where, after being captured by Luke, he works the pen out of his pocket and uses it to escape his bonds, making it seem as though Luke tied him up without disarming him.

to:

* Early in ''Literature/TheLightningThief'', ''Literature/PercyJacksonAndTheLightningThief'', it's mentioned that Percy's sword, Riptide, is enchanted to always return to his pocket in the event that he drops or loses it, an explanation that was left out of the two film adaptations. However, the second film still includes a moment where, after being captured by Luke, he works the pen out of his pocket and uses it to escape his bonds, making it seem as though Luke tied him up without disarming him.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** There's also no explanation for humanity's sudden technological advancements. In just a few decades, humans go from jet fighters being the epitome of aerial warfare to starships capable of beating the Formics back to their homeworld. We are left to assume ImportedAlienPhlebotinum thanks to all those Formic ships that fell from the sky. It's mostly the same in the books too, except the books feature ''two'' Formic invasions. However, even the First Invasion took place when humans already had hundreds of ships prowling the Solar System and gravity-manipulation technology (according to the prequels). The prequels also show the clear attempts to preserve the Formic ship for study and the foreknowledge of the impending arrival of the main Formic fleet (i.e. the Second Invasion).

to:

** There's also no explanation for humanity's sudden technological advancements. In just a few decades, humans go from jet fighters being the epitome of aerial warfare (Mazer Rackham flies an F-35 in a flashback) to starships capable of beating the Formics back to their homeworld. We are left to assume ImportedAlienPhlebotinum thanks to all those Formic ships that fell from the sky. It's mostly the same in the books too, except the books feature ''two'' Formic invasions. However, even the First Invasion took place when humans already had hundreds of ships prowling the Solar System and gravity-manipulation technology (according to the prequels). The prequels also show the clear attempts to preserve the Formic ship for study and the foreknowledge of the impending arrival of the main Formic fleet (i.e. the Second Invasion).
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* In the movie version of ''Theatre/PerfectPie'', Marie refuses to go swimming. In the play, this is because she’s been prone unpredictable seizures ever since she was a child and she’s afraid that she’ll have one while swimming and drown. In the movie, this trait was moved to her friend Patty, leaving Marie’s fear of swimming unexplained.

to:

* In the movie version of ''Theatre/PerfectPie'', Marie refuses to go swimming. In the play, this is because she’s been prone unpredictable seizures ever since she was a child and she’s afraid that she’ll have one while swimming and drown. In the movie, this trait was moved to her friend Patty, Patsy, leaving Marie’s fear of swimming unexplained.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* In the movie version of ''Theatre/PerfectPie'', Marie refuses to go swimming. In the play, this is because she’s been prone unpredictable seizures ever since she was a child and she’s afraid that she’ll have one while swimming and drown. In the movie, this trait was moved to her friend Patty, leaving Marie’s fear of swimming unexplained.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* The ''Series/MysteryScienceTheater3000'' episode version of ''Film/SpaceMutiny'' cuts out a small but important bit of dialogue where [[BigBad Kalgan]] explains the whole reason for wanting to mutiny and go to Corona Borealis is to sell the rest of the crew as slave to the pirates who live there. This has the unfortunate effect of making the mutineers UnintentionallySympathetic, as without this explanation it seems like they just want to go live on Corona Borealis, and the people in charge of the Southern Sun are forcing them to stay just [[BecauseISaidSo because they said so.

to:

* The ''Series/MysteryScienceTheater3000'' episode version of ''Film/SpaceMutiny'' cuts out a small but important bit of dialogue where [[BigBad Kalgan]] explains the whole reason for wanting to mutiny and go to Corona Borealis is to sell the rest of the crew as slave to the pirates who live there. This has the unfortunate effect of making the mutineers UnintentionallySympathetic, as without this explanation it seems like they just want to go live on Corona Borealis, and the people in charge of the Southern Sun are forcing them to stay just [[BecauseISaidSo because they said so.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* The ''Series/MysteryScienceTheater3000'' episode version of ''Film/SpaceMutiny'' cuts out a small but important bit of dialogue where [[BigBad Kalgan]] explains the whole reason for wanting to mutiny and go to Corona Borealis is to sell the rest of the crew as slave to the pirates who live there. This has the unfortunate effect of making the mutineers UnintentionallySympathetic, as without this explanation it seems like they just want to go live on Corona Borealis, and the people in charge of the Southern Sun are forcing them to stay just [[BecauseISaidSo because they said so.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* When Creator/StanleyKubrick adapted ''Film/TheShining'', he did this with several plot points. Kubrick cut out the explanation of who "Tony" is, the story of the dead lady in the bathtub, and the story of the fellow in the dog costume that Horace Derwent debases--but he left all of those moments in the movie, without explanation. He also revised the story's climax, cutting out the exploding boiler, but still took care to show the boiler in a couple of scenes. It's fairly likely that the absence of explanation for most of these elements was deliberate, though, [[TropesAreTools since the lack of exposition adds to the film's mystery and ability to shock the audience.]]

to:

* When Creator/StanleyKubrick adapted ''Film/TheShining'', he did this with several plot points. Kubrick cut out the explanation of who "Tony" is, the story of the dead lady in the bathtub, and the story of the fellow in the dog costume that Horace Derwent debases--but he left all of those moments in the movie, without explanation. He also revised the story's climax, cutting out the exploding boiler, but still took care to show the boiler in a couple of scenes. It's fairly likely that the absence of explanation for most of these elements was deliberate, though, [[TropesAreTools [[Administrivia/TropesAreTools since the lack of exposition adds to the film's mystery and ability to shock the audience.]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

** The movie omits the Tin Man's backstory, but vaguely implies that he's an {{artificial human}} who was magically made sentient. The book explains that he was once a perfectly normal human woodcutter, but lost all his limbs (and his head and torso) after the Wicked Witch of the East bewitched his axe to slip and cut him, forcing him to replace all of his body parts with tin. It also explains that he doesn't have a heart because the Witch used her magic to steal it, hoping to sabotage his relationship with the Munchkin girl who he planned to marry.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* ''Film/Annihilation2018'': The expedition team is [[ImprobablyFemaleCast made up entirely of women]] for no apparent reason. In [[Literature/TheSouthernReachTrilogy the book]] it’s revealed that the Southern Reach deliberately arranged the team that way to introduce yet another variable into their experiments with the Shimmer, which is also why most of the members are scientists and why the previous expeditions had similarly odd rosters; they’re not expected to stop the Shimmer, [[UnwittingTestSubject they’re sent there to help the Reach learn its capabilities and behavior]]. The movie excises this ([[AdaptedOut along with almost everything else that happens with the Reach during the trip]]), with the result that the military seems to send a group of [[NonActionGuy untrained]] scientists charging into a lethal EldritchLocation just because.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** The Witch’s weakness against water was another example of this: in the book, it’s exposited early on that the two Wicked Witches are so old and shriveled that they’ve essentially been mummified, with all the fluid in their bodies having dried up long ago. This was why the Witch of the East disappeared after Dorothy’s house fell on her — her body literally crumbled away into dust — and why a pail of water caused the Witch of the West to melt away. Whereas in the movies, it’s just a weird, unexplained weakness of hers’.

to:

** The Witch’s weakness against water was another example of this: in the book, it’s exposited early on that the two Wicked Witches are so old and shriveled that they’ve essentially been mummified, with all the fluid in their bodies having dried up long ago. This was why the Witch of the East disappeared after Dorothy’s house fell on her — her body literally crumbled away into dust — and why a pail of water caused the Witch of the West to melt away. Whereas in the movies, it’s just a weird, unexplained weakness of hers’.hers.

Changed: 302

Removed: 302

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
Fixed formatting for Oz entry


** Some viewers might wonder why everyone in Oz seems to accept the Wizard as the ruler of the Emerald City so casually, since he's an outsider who wasn't even born in Oz, and there must have been someone else ruling the Emerald City before he dropped in. For that matter, his departure can cause a bit of FridgeHorror when you think about the fact that he's essentially leaving a ''power vacuum'' in the capital of Oz, with no apparent plans to appoint a successor. The novel (and its sequels) explained both points: he named the Scarecrow as his successor before he left Oz, and it was later revealed that the previous ruler of Oz was a benevolent king named Pastoria who died shortly before the Wizard arrived, while his daughter Princess Ozma mysteriously vanished soon afterward. [[note]]
The TwistEnding of ''Literature/TheMarvelousLandOfOz'' reveals that Ozma had her memories erased by an evil witch named Mombi, who transformed her into a young boy named "Tip" to hide her identity. Once Tip is unmasked as Ozma and turned back, she assumes the throne in the Emerald City again.[[/note]]

to:

** Some viewers might wonder why everyone in Oz seems to accept the Wizard as the ruler of the Emerald City so casually, since he's an outsider who wasn't even born in Oz, and there must have been someone else ruling the Emerald City before he dropped in. For that matter, his departure can cause a bit of FridgeHorror when you think about the fact that he's essentially leaving a ''power vacuum'' in the capital of Oz, with no apparent plans to appoint a successor. The novel (and its sequels) explained both points: he named the Scarecrow as his successor before he left Oz, and it was later revealed that the previous ruler of Oz was a benevolent king named Pastoria who died shortly before the Wizard arrived, while his daughter Princess Ozma mysteriously vanished soon afterward. [[note]]
[[note]] The TwistEnding of ''Literature/TheMarvelousLandOfOz'' reveals that Ozma had her memories erased by an evil witch named Mombi, who transformed her into a young boy named "Tip" to hide her identity. Once Tip is unmasked as Ozma and turned back, she assumes the throne in the Emerald City again.[[/note]]

Added: 828

Changed: 302

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** Some viewers might wonder why everyone in Oz seems to accept the Wizard as the ruler of the Emerald City so casually, since he's an outsider who wasn't even born in Oz, and there must have been someone else ruling the Emerald City before he dropped in. For that matter, his departure can cause a bit of FridgeHorror when you think about the fact that he's essentially leaving a ''power vacuum'' in the capital of Oz, with no apparent plans to appoint a successor. The novel (and its sequels) explained both points: he named the Scarecrow as his successor before he left Oz, and it was later revealed that the previous ruler of Oz was a benevolent king named Pastoria who died shortly before the Wizard arrived, while his daughter Princess Ozma mysteriously vanished soon afterward. [[note]] The TwistEnding of ''Literature/TheMarvelousLandOfOz'' reveals that Ozma had her memories erased by an evil witch named Mombi, who transformed her into a young boy named "Tip" to hide her identity. Once Tip is unmasked as Ozma and turned back, she assumes the throne in the Emerald City again.[[/note]]

to:

** Some viewers might wonder why everyone in Oz seems to accept the Wizard as the ruler of the Emerald City so casually, since he's an outsider who wasn't even born in Oz, and there must have been someone else ruling the Emerald City before he dropped in. For that matter, his departure can cause a bit of FridgeHorror when you think about the fact that he's essentially leaving a ''power vacuum'' in the capital of Oz, with no apparent plans to appoint a successor. The novel (and its sequels) explained both points: he named the Scarecrow as his successor before he left Oz, and it was later revealed that the previous ruler of Oz was a benevolent king named Pastoria who died shortly before the Wizard arrived, while his daughter Princess Ozma mysteriously vanished soon afterward. [[note]] [[note]]
The TwistEnding of ''Literature/TheMarvelousLandOfOz'' reveals that Ozma had her memories erased by an evil witch named Mombi, who transformed her into a young boy named "Tip" to hide her identity. Once Tip is unmasked as Ozma and turned back, she assumes the throne in the Emerald City again.[[/note]][[/note]]
** The Witch’s weakness against water was another example of this: in the book, it’s exposited early on that the two Wicked Witches are so old and shriveled that they’ve essentially been mummified, with all the fluid in their bodies having dried up long ago. This was why the Witch of the East disappeared after Dorothy’s house fell on her — her body literally crumbled away into dust — and why a pail of water caused the Witch of the West to melt away. Whereas in the movies, it’s just a weird, unexplained weakness of hers’.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** In the first book, Gandalf stops at Edoras before going to Rivendell -- and learns that Grima Wormtongue has already begun poisoning Theoden's mind. This is left out of the film, so it's up in the air how Gandalf is so up to date on what's happening in Rohan.

to:

** In the first book, Gandalf stops at Edoras before going to Rivendell -- and learns that Grima Wormtongue has already begun poisoning Theoden's mind. He stops back again before his reunion with Aragorn, Legolas, and Gimli, giving him a further sense of the extent of the damage. This is left out of the film, so it's up in the air how Gandalf is so up to date on what's happening in Rohan.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
This is just a plot change. An Adaptation Induced Plot Hole is when the same thing happens in both versions, but isn't explained in the adaptation.


** In the film, Eddie is in the church because he is [[PrayerOfMalice praying that God will kill Peter]], which seems a ridiculously extreme reaction -- yes, Peter cost him his job and wasn't exactly nice about it, but the two were competing for one position and losing your job is hardly something to kill someone over. In the comics, on the other hand, Eddie is there to seek forgiveness. Peter ''does'' cause Eddie to lose his job, but as Spider-Man rather than Peter Parker. Subsequently, in the comics Venom hates Spider-Man in his own right, rather than because he's Peter Parker.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* In the original novel which ''Film/WhoFramedRogerRabbit'' is based on, the book's surprise ending contains an explanation for the seemingly implausible pairing of Jessica and Roger. As the plot of the novel is completely different from the film, however, the movie's version of the Jessica/Roger relationship is simply treated as some strange, funny case of DeliberateValuesDissonance between humans and toons.

to:

* In the original The novel which ''Literature/WhoCensoredRogerRabbit'' (which ''Film/WhoFramedRogerRabbit'' is based on, the book's surprise ending contains an explanation for on) has a TwistEnding that explains the seemingly implausible pairing of Jessica and Roger.Roger: [[spoiler:the {{Macguffin}} is actually a magic lamp containing a genie, which granted Roger two wishes--one of which was to marry Jessica]]. As the plot of the novel is completely different from the film, however, the movie's version of the Jessica/Roger relationship is simply treated as some strange, funny case of DeliberateValuesDissonance between humans and toons.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** The original ''Film/XMen'' trilogy might leave some viewers wondering how Professor Xavier can afford a sprawling Westchester mansion with its own stealth jet--since he has no apparent source of income, and doesn't appear to charge tuition to his students. The comics explain that he's the heir to a vast family fortune, and the mansion is an ancestral manor that's been in his family for five generations.[[note]] May overlap with AdaptationInducedPlotHole, since the movies' version of Xavier appears to be ''British'', yet somehow apparently inherited a mansion in upstate New York.[[/note]]

to:

** The original ''Film/XMen'' ''X-Men'' trilogy might leave some viewers wondering how Professor Xavier can afford a sprawling Westchester mansion with its own stealth jet--since he has no apparent source of income, and doesn't appear to charge tuition to his students. The comics explain that he's the heir to a vast family fortune, and the mansion is an ancestral manor that's been in his family for five generations.[[note]] May overlap with AdaptationInducedPlotHole, since the movies' version of Xavier appears to be ''British'', yet somehow apparently inherited a mansion in upstate New York.[[/note]]
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
fixed some typos


* In ''Film/EdgeOfTomorrow'', soldiers use variety of guns but Rita Vrataski uses a CoolSword instead. Why she and only she is using a melee weapon is never explained. ''LightNovel/AllYouNeedIsKill'' from which the movie was adapted explains why. Guns have limited ammo which means no matter how good Rita will get she can only kill so much aliens in a single battle, and a melee weapon removes this limitation. On the other hand it's DifficultButAwesome to use and the only reason why Rita is capable of using it effectively is because she was stuck in GroundhogDayLoop and had as much time to train as she wanted.

to:

* In ''Film/EdgeOfTomorrow'', soldiers use variety of guns but Rita Vrataski uses a CoolSword instead. Why she and only she is using a melee weapon is never explained. ''LightNovel/AllYouNeedIsKill'' from which the movie was adapted explains why. Guns have limited ammo which means no matter how good Rita will get she can only kill so much many aliens in a single battle, and a melee weapon removes this limitation. On the other hand it's DifficultButAwesome to use and the only reason why Rita is capable of using it effectively is because she was stuck in GroundhogDayLoop and had as much time to train as she wanted.



* Happens in TheRemake of ''Film/TheHaunting1999''. After Elenor has been thrown out of bed, she asks, "Who's holding my hand?" In [[Film/TheHaunting1963 the original movie]], this was spoken at the end of a rather tense scene in which Elenor is convinced that Theo is holding her hand. However, it is revealed a moment later than Theo is on the other side of the room, and that no one was holding her hand. It is used out of context and without explanation in the remake, as there is no one in the room with Elenor, nor did she imply at any point that someone was holding her hand before she asked the question.

to:

* Happens in TheRemake of ''Film/TheHaunting1999''. After Elenor Eleanor has been thrown out of bed, she asks, "Who's holding my hand?" In [[Film/TheHaunting1963 the original movie]], this was spoken at the end of a rather tense scene in which Elenor Eleanor is convinced that Theo is holding her hand. However, it is revealed a moment later than Theo is on the other side of the room, and that no one was holding her hand. It is used out of context and without explanation in the remake, as there is no one in the room with Elenor, Eleanor, nor did she imply at any point that someone was holding her hand before she asked the question.



** In the first book, Gandalf stops at Edoras before going to Rivendell - and learns that Grima Wormtongue has already begun poisoning Theoden's mind. This is left out of the film, so it's up in the air how Gandalf is so up to date on what's happening in Rohan.

to:

** In the first book, Gandalf stops at Edoras before going to Rivendell - -- and learns that Grima Wormtongue has already begun poisoning Theoden's mind. This is left out of the film, so it's up in the air how Gandalf is so up to date on what's happening in Rohan.



* ''Film/{{She|1965}}'' (1965): [[{{Literature/She}} The novel]] has a complicated beginning descibing how Horace Holly gets drawn into the Vincey family quest to find a lost city in DarkestAfrica, and the months of preparation he and Leo Vincey take before setting out for Africa. The 1965 movie drops all of that and opens with Holly and Vincey, army buddies, already in Africa on unrelated business when the opportunity to search for a lost city is presented to them. As a result, it's just a convenient coincidence that Holly happens to know a lot of useful stuff about antiquity.

to:

* ''Film/{{She|1965}}'' (1965): [[{{Literature/She}} The novel]] has a complicated beginning descibing describing how Horace Holly gets drawn into the Vincey family quest to find a lost city in DarkestAfrica, and the months of preparation he and Leo Vincey take before setting out for Africa. The 1965 movie drops all of that and opens with Holly and Vincey, army buddies, already in Africa on unrelated business when the opportunity to search for a lost city is presented to them. As a result, it's just a convenient coincidence that Holly happens to know a lot of useful stuff about antiquity.



** In the film, Eddie is in the church because he is [[PrayerOfMalice praying that God will kill Peter]], which seems a ridiculously extreme reaction - yes, Peter cost him his job and wasn't exactly nice about it, but the two were competing for one position and losing your job is hardly something to kill someone over. In the comics, on the other hand, Eddie is there to seek forgiveness. Peter ''does'' cause Eddie to lose his job, but as Spider-Man rather than Peter Parker. Subsequently, in the comics Venom hates Spider-Man in his own right, rather than because he's Peter Parker.

to:

** In the film, Eddie is in the church because he is [[PrayerOfMalice praying that God will kill Peter]], which seems a ridiculously extreme reaction - -- yes, Peter cost him his job and wasn't exactly nice about it, but the two were competing for one position and losing your job is hardly something to kill someone over. In the comics, on the other hand, Eddie is there to seek forgiveness. Peter ''does'' cause Eddie to lose his job, but as Spider-Man rather than Peter Parker. Subsequently, in the comics Venom hates Spider-Man in his own right, rather than because he's Peter Parker.



* The film adaptation of ''Literature/{{Timeline}}'' foregoes the language difficulties presented in the book. In the book, the medieval characters speak a mixture of Middle English, Old French, Occitan and Latin, with the time travelers needing earpiece translators to understand them whilst they themselves struggled to be understood. In the film, the medievals simply speak modern English and French and have no trouble understanding the time travelers.

to:

* The film adaptation of ''Literature/{{Timeline}}'' foregoes the language difficulties presented in the book. In the book, the medieval characters speak a mixture of Middle English, Old French, Occitan and Latin, with the time travelers needing earpiece translators to understand them whilst while they themselves struggled struggle to be understood. In the film, the medievals simply speak modern English and French and have no trouble understanding the time travelers.



* In ''Film/VampireAcademy'', Lissa is tortured by an blind user to prevent her from using compulsion on him. However, this [[http://wlswarts.blogspot.com/2014/03/twilight-goes-to-hogwarts-for.html review]] points out that [[FridgeLogic why couldn't she heal his blindness just so she could compel him?]] This is because her hands are tied down, and her healing power only works through psychical contact such as by touch, which is out right explained in [[Literature/VampireAcademy the Book]] but only hinted at in the Movie.

to:

* In ''Film/VampireAcademy'', Lissa is tortured by an blind user to prevent her from using compulsion on him. However, this [[http://wlswarts.blogspot.com/2014/03/twilight-goes-to-hogwarts-for.html review]] points out that [[FridgeLogic why couldn't she heal his blindness just so she could compel him?]] This is because her hands are tied down, and her healing power only works through psychical physical contact such as by touch, which is out right outright explained in [[Literature/VampireAcademy the Book]] but only hinted at in the Movie.



** [[ColorCodedForYourConvenience The significance of various colors]] was always a central part of the Oz mythos in the books, as Oz was portrayed as a society built around the celebration of color and beauty. This is why some of the most iconic elements of the story are instantly identifiable by their color: Dorothy wears [[IconicOutfit a blue gingham dress and red ruby slippers]] [[note]] Though they were silver shoes in the book [[/note]], she travels along a yellow brick road to reach a city of green emeralds, there's a deliberate shot of a red brick road that leads in the opposite direction from the yellow brick road, and [[DeliberatelyMonochrome scenes in Oz are filmed in color while scenes in Kansas are filmed in monochrome]]. The movie retains the original book's striking use of color, but it generally doesn't explain ''why'' the various colors are significant. In the book, the Munchkins instantly trust Dorothy because she wears blue, which is the color of Munchkinland; various characters assume that Dorothy is a witch because her dress is patterned with white checks, and only sorceresses wear white; the Yellow Brick Road is yellow because it leads to Winkie Country (the land West of Munchkinland ruled by the Wicked Witch), whose color is yellow; the Red Brick Road in Munchkinland leads to Quadling Country, whose color is red; and the Emerald City is green because it's an independent capital city that lies at the center of the four regions of Oz, and thus has its own color.

to:

** [[ColorCodedForYourConvenience The significance of various colors]] was always a central part of the Oz mythos in the books, as Oz was portrayed as a society built around the celebration of color and beauty. This is why some of the most iconic elements of the story are instantly identifiable by their color: Dorothy wears [[IconicOutfit a blue gingham dress and red ruby slippers]] [[note]] Though [[note]]Though they were silver shoes in the book [[/note]], book[[/note]], she travels along a yellow brick road to reach a city of green emeralds, there's a deliberate shot of a red brick road that leads in the opposite direction from the yellow brick road, and [[DeliberatelyMonochrome scenes in Oz are filmed in color while scenes in Kansas are filmed in monochrome]]. The movie retains the original book's striking use of color, but it generally doesn't explain ''why'' the various colors are significant. In the book, the Munchkins instantly trust Dorothy because she wears blue, which is the color of Munchkinland; various characters assume that Dorothy is a witch because her dress is patterned with white checks, and only sorceresses wear white; the Yellow Brick Road is yellow because it leads to Winkie Country (the land West west of Munchkinland ruled by the Wicked Witch), whose color is yellow; the Red Brick Road in Munchkinland leads to Quadling Country, whose color is red; and the Emerald City is green because it's an independent capital city that lies at the center of the four regions of Oz, and thus has its own color.

Added: 1175

Changed: 11

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


** The original ''Film/XMen'' trilogy might leave some viewers wondering how Professor Xavier can afford a sprawling Westchester mansion with its own stealth jet--since he has no apparent source of income, and doesn't appear to charge tuition to his students. The comics explain that he's the heir to a vast family fortune, and the mansion is an ancestral manor that's been in his family for five generations.[[note]] May overlap with AdaptationInducedPlotHole, since the movies' version of Xavier appears to be ''British'', yet somehow inherited a mansion in upstate New York.[[/note]]

to:

** The original ''Film/XMen'' trilogy might leave some viewers wondering how Professor Xavier can afford a sprawling Westchester mansion with its own stealth jet--since he has no apparent source of income, and doesn't appear to charge tuition to his students. The comics explain that he's the heir to a vast family fortune, and the mansion is an ancestral manor that's been in his family for five generations.[[note]] May overlap with AdaptationInducedPlotHole, since the movies' version of Xavier appears to be ''British'', yet somehow apparently inherited a mansion in upstate New York.[[/note]][[/note]]
** The movies' portrayal of ComicBook/{{Cyclops}} keeps most of his notable traits from the comics, but they omit his backstory, leaving most of those traits unexplained. In particular: he's shown to be much closer to Professor Xavier than the other X-Men, and he [[BlessedWithSuck can't control his optic blasts]] (forcing him to wear his ruby quartz glasses constantly). The comics explain that he lost his parents in a plane crash when he was a child, and the Professor is [[ParentalSubstitute the closest thing he has to a father]]; he suffered significant brain damage in the crash, which left him permanently unable to control his powers when they manifested.


Added DiffLines:

** ''Film/XMenFirstClass'' leaves it ambiguous how Sebastian Shaw and the Hellfire Club have enough money and influence to drive the nations of the world to the brink of nuclear war. The comics explain that the Hellfire Club is ''much'' older than Shaw himself; it's a centuries-old fraternal organization that was originally a secret society for the wealthy and elite of the world, but Sebastian Shaw and Emma Frost led a [[TheCoup coup]] from within and seized full control of the group's accumulated riches.

Added: 2111

Changed: 325

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ''Film/XMenApocalypse'' doesn't waste any time explaining how [[ComicBook/{{Storm}} Ororo Munroe]] wound up living in Egypt, despite being (by all appearances) of sub-Saharan African descent. The ''ComicBook/XMen'' comics explain that she was born in Harlem to an African-American father and a Kenyan mother, but moved to Cairo as a child.

to:

* ''Film/XMenFilmSeries:''
** The original ''Film/XMen'' trilogy might leave some viewers wondering how Professor Xavier can afford a sprawling Westchester mansion with its own stealth jet--since he has no apparent source of income, and doesn't appear to charge tuition to his students. The comics explain that he's the heir to a vast family fortune, and the mansion is an ancestral manor that's been in his family for five generations.[[note]] May overlap with AdaptationInducedPlotHole, since the movies' version of Xavier appears to be ''British'', yet somehow inherited a mansion in upstate New York.[[/note]]
** The movies are deliberately vague about the origins of the Mutant race, but they generally imply that Mutants are a perfectly natural evolutionary offshoot of humanity. The comics explain that Mutants exist as a result of [[SufficientlyAdvancedAliens the Celestials]] implanting the X-gene into the DNA of a few early humans, eventually causing their descendants to develop bizarre mutations; this is generally used as a cozy HandWave for why Mutants' powers [[SuperpowerLottery vary so widely]], and why some of them have abilities that appear more magical than biological.
** ''Film/XMenDaysOfFuturePast'' is rather vague about why the Sentinels conquered all of humanity in the film's BadFuture, despite being designed solely to hunt and kill Mutants. The comic book storyline explains that it was a twisted case of GoneHorriblyRight: Bolivar Trask programmed his robots to stamp out the Mutant race by any means necessary, but didn't consider how many ordinary humans carried the "X-gene" that causes mutation; the Sentinels proved to be a little too good at their jobs, and eventually began building concentration camps for processing and detaining all humans with the X-gene.
**
''Film/XMenApocalypse'' doesn't waste any time explaining how [[ComicBook/{{Storm}} Ororo Munroe]] wound up living in Egypt, despite being (by all appearances) of sub-Saharan African descent. The ''ComicBook/XMen'' comics explain that she was born in Harlem to an African-American father and a Kenyan mother, but moved to Cairo as a child.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* ''Film/XMenApocalypse'' doesn't waste any time explaining how [[ComicBook/{{Storm}} Ororo Munroe]] wound up living in Egypt, despite being (by all appearances) of sub-Saharan African descent. The ''ComicBook/XMen'' comics explain that she was born in Harlem to an African-American father and a Kenyan mother, but moved to Cairo as a child.
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
This simply isn't true. They are all well-aware of what the Ring is. They all told Isildur to destroy it. The reason they didn't try to take it from him is because they didn't want to start another war right then and there. Besides, nobody can actually destroy the Ring, so it wouldn't have worked. Anyone who tries will just claim it for themselves. That's why it falls in 'accidentally' in the end.


** Many who haven't read the books wonder why, if the ring was so evil, and Isildur wouldn't destroy it, Elrond didn't just grab it from him and destroy it himself, or even just push Isildur into the lava. In the books, no-one at that time is sure of exactly what the ring does, Elrond included; they have no idea that it's keeping Sauron alive. Isildur takes the ring as a memorial of their victory, and no-one really has any reason to oppose him doing so.

Added: 261

Changed: 202

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* In the 1997 adaptation of ''Literature/ALittlePrincess'', Sara wakes up to find her attic room filled with food, clothing and other luxuries. In the book, these things were brought to her in secret over a number of weeks by Ram Dass, the Indian man living next door, while she slept. In the film, they're just ''there'' with no explanation.

to:

* In the 1997 1995 adaptation of ''Literature/ALittlePrincess'', Sara wakes up to find her attic room filled with food, clothing and other luxuries. In the book, these things were brought to her in secret over a number of weeks by Ram Dass, the Indian man living next door, while she slept. In the film, they're just ''there'' with no explanation. Ram Dass is however implied to [[MagicRealism be magical in some way]], as it's also he who [[spoiler: helps Sara's amnesiac father to remember her [[SparedByTheAdaptation (he died in the book)]].]]


Added DiffLines:

** In the first book, Gandalf stops at Edoras before going to Rivendell - and learns that Grima Wormtongue has already begun poisoning Theoden's mind. This is left out of the film, so it's up in the air how Gandalf is so up to date on what's happening in Rohan.

Changed: 70

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ''Film/BladeRunner'': [[Literature/DoAndroidsDreamOfElectricSheep The book]] made a big deal about how real animals have almost died off and everyone is socially obliged to own one to show off their "empathy". The movie doesn't really explain this but keeps a couple of references to it, like the artificial owl and someone's reaction that collecting (and killing) butterflies would be a sick thing for a child to do.

to:

* ''Film/BladeRunner'': [[Literature/DoAndroidsDreamOfElectricSheep The book]] made a big deal about how real animals have almost died off and everyone is socially obliged to own one to show off their "empathy". The movie doesn't really explain this but keeps a couple of references to it, like it -- the artificial owl and someone's reaction that collecting (and killing) butterflies would be a sick thing for a child to do.do. The latter especially is a bit random without the explanation.

Added: 33

Changed: 423

Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None


* ''Film/TheChroniclesOfNarnia'':

to:

* ''Film/TheChroniclesOfNarnia'': ''Film/BladeRunner'': [[Literature/DoAndroidsDreamOfElectricSheep The book]] made a big deal about how real animals have almost died off and everyone is socially obliged to own one to show off their "empathy". The movie doesn't really explain this but keeps a couple of references to it, like the artificial owl and someone's reaction that collecting (and killing) butterflies would be a sick thing for a child to do.
* ''Film/TheChroniclesOfNarnia'':
Is there an issue? Send a MessageReason:
None

Added DiffLines:

* In ''Film/BattleRoyale'' Shuya and Noriko are shot and killed (off screen) by Shogo, but turn up alive later during Shogo's confrontation with Kitano, with only a throwaway line about Shogo hacking the computer system as explanation. Particularly egregious since no mention is made of Shogo being able to do so, and Shinji successfully hacked the system earlier in the film. Fans of the book will know, however, that Shogo hacked the system before the program began to figure out how to disarm the explosive collars worn by all participants, and transferred into the class selected to participate in order to save as many people as possible.
* ''Film/TheBigSleep'' had to [[{{Bowdlerise}} omit any references to pornography or homosexuality]] thanks to UsefulNotes/TheHaysCode. As such, it's left unexplained what's going on in the back of Geiger's store that's so secret, what sort of blackmail material he had on Carmen, and why that one guy [[spoiler:hid Geiger's body and shot the man who killed him]]. In [[Literature/TheBigSleep the book]], the explanations are, in order: [[spoiler:it's a black market pornography business; he had nude photographs of Carmen; the guy was Geiger's lover.]]
* ''Film/TheChroniclesOfNarnia'':
** In ''Literature/TheLionTheWitchAndTheWardrobe'', after the kids become kings and queens of Narnia, the narration tells how they ruled successfully for years and years and were given nicknames: King Peter {{the Magnificent}}, Queen Susan the Gentle, King Edmund the Just, Queen Lucy the Valiant. In the film, they're crowned with these names while still kids just after winning their victory, which makes them seem slightly ridiculous and over-the-top -- especially in the case of Edmund, whose main contribution to the plot was betraying his siblings to the White Witch before he got better.
** It's explained in the book that the White Witch's Turkish Delight is [[VerySpecialEpisode instantly addictive]], making Edmund's betrayal over a supply of candy seem far less petty.
* In ''Film/{{Cinderella 2015}}'', Gus Gus retains his name from [[Disney/{{Cinderella}} the animated film]], but no mention is given of his real name "Octavius," from which Augustus/Gus is a nickname of.
* In the original ''Literature/{{Congo}}'' novel, Karen is a CorruptCorporateExecutive whose only interest is finding diamonds for her firm. She loads an abandoned mine with dynamite near a dormant volcano in an effort to locate more diamonds and the resulting explosion triggers an eruption that [[CollapsingLair destroys the abandoned city]] and forces them to OutrunTheFireball. In the ''Film/{{Congo}}'' film, her character is a lot more sympathetic, the reason she joins the expedition is to find her CanonForeigner boyfriend who was in an earlier expedition that vanished and the dynamite thing doesn't happen. The great eruption in the film is reduced to a random coincidence. The book also has explanations for the killer gorillas (guard animals gone feral, but smart enough to pass their training to their descendants) and why the city was abandoned (the traits the company wants the diamonds for made them worthless to the original inhabitants, who had no reason to stay when the more desirable ones were gone).
* David Lynch's adaptation of ''Film/{{Dune}}'' is one big mess of this. Hardly anything is given a proper explanation, and the film even features a few setups to plot threads whose payoffs are not included.
* In ''Film/EdgeOfTomorrow'', soldiers use variety of guns but Rita Vrataski uses a CoolSword instead. Why she and only she is using a melee weapon is never explained. ''LightNovel/AllYouNeedIsKill'' from which the movie was adapted explains why. Guns have limited ammo which means no matter how good Rita will get she can only kill so much aliens in a single battle, and a melee weapon removes this limitation. On the other hand it's DifficultButAwesome to use and the only reason why Rita is capable of using it effectively is because she was stuck in GroundhogDayLoop and had as much time to train as she wanted.
* ''Film/EndersGame'':
** In the film, the xenocide of the Formic species is [[MyGodWhatHaveIDone presented just as negatively as it was in the book]], but it's never actually explained that [[spoiler:the Formic War originally started because of an interspecies misunderstanding, as the HiveMind Formics were incapable of understanding humans' individual consciousness, and didn't realize that they were killing sentient beings until it was too late]]. In the film, everyone (Ender included) seems to agree that they're a legitimate menace, only questioning the methods used to defeat them.
** Ender's decision to [[spoiler:leave Earth to search for a new Formic home world]] also receives far less explanation than it did in the book, largely because of Peter and Valentine's side plot being cut. In the book, it was explained that the political situation on Earth [[YouCantGoHomeAgain made it impossible for Ender to return to Earth]], as the Second Warsaw Pact wanted him dead, and America and its allies wanted him on their side in the coming war with Russia. Also, it was explained that [[spoiler:the death of the Formics]] had led to an extraterrestrial colonization program, and that Ender had accepted an offer to govern a colony; in the movie, he just aimlessly goes off to [[WalkingTheEarth wander the cosmos]] alone, with no obvious destination in mind.
** There's also no explanation for humanity's sudden technological advancements. In just a few decades, humans go from jet fighters being the epitome of aerial warfare to starships capable of beating the Formics back to their homeworld. We are left to assume ImportedAlienPhlebotinum thanks to all those Formic ships that fell from the sky. It's mostly the same in the books too, except the books feature ''two'' Formic invasions. However, even the First Invasion took place when humans already had hundreds of ships prowling the Solar System and gravity-manipulation technology (according to the prequels). The prequels also show the clear attempts to preserve the Formic ship for study and the foreknowledge of the impending arrival of the main Formic fleet (i.e. the Second Invasion).
** If you didn't read the book, you could be forgiven for not realizing that the Mind Game is a WideOpenSandbox rather than a simple linear fantasy game -- which is problematic, since the famous "Giant's Drink" sequence can end up looking a tad ridiculous if you don't know that. With the Mind Game as a sprawling, open-ended universe, it's understandable that Ender's fixation on [[TheComputerIsACheatingBastard the Giant's Drink challenge]] could come off as disturbing, since most children would simply dismiss the challenge as unwinnable and move on to another part of the game. Presented as one level in a linear game, Ender's solution ([[spoiler:murdering the Giant]]) becomes the obvious one, his persistence just makes him look like a {{Determinator}}, and the grown-ups' horror upon seeing Ender TakingAThirdOption looking like they are clueless about how game programming works and/or didn't bothered to call the game's developer to see if that was even possible (the book also mentions something about the game being self-procedurally generating (which is why there's a big surprise about seeing artificial copies of Peter and Valentine Wiggin in the game -- the computer was just trying to put ''something'' there because nobody had ever beaten the Drink puzzle ever before and there was no "standard" content as a result, so the game mined Ender's psych profile), but ''this'' explanation doesn't appears on the movie either -- the copies are just... ''there'').
* Happens in TheRemake of ''Film/TheHaunting1999''. After Elenor has been thrown out of bed, she asks, "Who's holding my hand?" In [[Film/TheHaunting1963 the original movie]], this was spoken at the end of a rather tense scene in which Elenor is convinced that Theo is holding her hand. However, it is revealed a moment later than Theo is on the other side of the room, and that no one was holding her hand. It is used out of context and without explanation in the remake, as there is no one in the room with Elenor, nor did she imply at any point that someone was holding her hand before she asked the question.
* ''Film/TheHungerGames'': In the movie, we never find out the symbolic significance of the mockingjay, nor what the Muttations are made out of (in the book, it [[spoiler:''appeared to be'' dead tributes mixed with wolf.]])
* The live action adaptation of ''Manga/JoJosBizarreAdventureDiamondIsUnbreakable'' removes any reference to DIO or the events of ''Manga/JojosBizarreAdventureStardustCrusaders'', leaving certain aspects of the backstory unexplained.
* ''Film/JohnCarter'': how quickly John learns Barsoomian. The book states that all Barsoomians have some PsychicPowers. The only explanation for this in the film is that Sola is speaking to him in the "voice of Barsoom."
* ''Film/JurassicPark''
** The movie is occasionally criticized for the film claiming its moral is about the unpredictability of nature, when it was really all [[spoiler:the programmer Nedry's]] fault. [[Literature/JurassicPark The book]] covers this by showing evidence from the park's own data that the populations were indeed out of control. [[spoiler:Nedry]] wasn't the sole cause of the collapse, but he was the final crack to the foundation.
** The famous sick-triceratops scene also reproduces enough information from the book to infer, if you've read it, that [[spoiler:some of the dinosaurs are eating toxic plants, despite the efforts of the park to manage the park's flora.]] However, the lysine contingency is mentioned [[spoiler:without reference to the trouble it ends up causing in the book.]]
** The first book ended with Nublar island being carpet-bombed by the (funnily non-existent) Costa Rican airforce, hence Ingen's new ruling bureau's (and in the second book, Biosyn's) need to go to the "Site B" and get their dinosaurs there. This was actually explained in a scene of the ''Lost World'' movie but was left out of the theatrical cut, leaving the casual viewer wondering why Ingen didn't just go back to Nublar, the island with some working infrastructure left and pick some of the dinosaurs still penned up there, rather than massing "two dozen cowboys" and going to catch the entirely free ones in Sorna.
*** This question was compounded when ''Film/JurassicWorld'' established that Isla Nublar did survive in the movie continuity.
* ''Film/TheLeagueOfExtraordinaryGentlemen'':
** The movie keeps [[ComicBook/TheLeagueOfExtraordinaryGentlemen the comic book]]'s [[TheReveal dramatic revelation]] that "M" is [[spoiler: [[Literature/SherlockHolmes Professor James Moriarty]]]], but it never actually explains ''how'' a simple [[spoiler: mathematics professor]]--who's also a [[spoiler: notorious criminal mastermind]]--came to be the head of British Intelligence. The comic book explains that British Intelligence recruited him as an informant years before [[spoiler: his confrontation with Sherlock Holmes]], allowing him to rise up the ranks of the service until he became the powerful "M".
** Unlike the movie, the comic book makes it clear from the beginning that it takes place in a world where [[AllMythsAreTrue all fiction is true]]. Among other things, this means that [[spoiler: Sherlock Holmes]] is a very real world-renowned celebrity whose [[NeverFoundTheBody apparent death]] made major headlines. Therefore, it's a bit more understandable that Quatermain instantly knows who [[spoiler: Moriarty]] is upon seeing his face.
* Early in ''Literature/TheLightningThief'', it's mentioned that Percy's sword, Riptide, is enchanted to always return to his pocket in the event that he drops or loses it, an explanation that was left out of the two film adaptations. However, the second film still includes a moment where, after being captured by Luke, he works the pen out of his pocket and uses it to escape his bonds, making it seem as though Luke tied him up without disarming him.
* In the 1997 adaptation of ''Literature/ALittlePrincess'', Sara wakes up to find her attic room filled with food, clothing and other luxuries. In the book, these things were brought to her in secret over a number of weeks by Ram Dass, the Indian man living next door, while she slept. In the film, they're just ''there'' with no explanation.
* The largely unexplained backstory to ''Film/TheLordOfTheRings'' leaves quite a few of these.
** Many who haven't read the books wonder why, if the ring was so evil, and Isildur wouldn't destroy it, Elrond didn't just grab it from him and destroy it himself, or even just push Isildur into the lava. In the books, no-one at that time is sure of exactly what the ring does, Elrond included; they have no idea that it's keeping Sauron alive. Isildur takes the ring as a memorial of their victory, and no-one really has any reason to oppose him doing so.
** The issue of Aragorn as heir to the throne of Gondor. If Boromir can recognise the heir of Isildur simply from the name 'Aragorn', then why isn't he king already? In the books, the issue is far more complicated; while Aragorn is the only surviving heir, he's only distantly related to the old Kings of Gondor, and he also comes from a line that had previously been excluded from the Gondorian succession. The movies explained this as Aragorn himself being reluctant to become king, for fear of falling to petty evil the same way his ancestor Isildur did.
** One issue that is routinely brought up as though it's a plot hole is "Why didn't the Fellowship just use the eagles and fly the One Ring to Mount Doom, then drop it in from the air?" There are a number of reasons in the books that explain why. The Eagles are forbidden by their creator from intervening directly in the War, so they won't shepherd the Ring themselves. They also would be just as likely to be tempted to take the Ring for themselves as any other sentient creature. The most obvious reason is that the whole point of the Fellowship is to avoid detection, and a flock of eagles would bring all of Sauron's forces down on their heads. For all these reasons, the Eagles are only free to arrive once the Ring is gone and Sauron is defeated. Another factor is that their power is greatly increased in the movies; while their arrival did turn the tide in the book it was the assembled armies of their entire race intervening (which had been established to be mustering much earlier), not just four guys.
* In the film of ''Film/ThePrincessBride'', Buttercup is somewhat confusingly presented to the populace as a princess when she's betrothed, but not yet married, to Prince Humperdinck. The book explains that she was declared princess-by-fiat of some little backwater principality just so that Humperdinck wouldn't be marrying a commoner.
* ''Film/AScannerDarkly'':
** In the novel, Bob and friends freak out and get angry because Barris brings home an 18 speed bike he bought from someone, but Luckman only counts 9 gears (6 in back, 3 in front), leading them to think Barris got ripped off. Later, when Bob gets debriefed by his superiors, he's told that they're pulling him out because the drugs he uses while undercover are starting to affect his brain too much. They saw the group's reaction to the bike gears, due to the house being under surveillance, and they explain to Bob that the problem was that the group was adding the two sets of gears instead of multiplying them, which is how multiple speed bikes work. Bob's inability to figure out the problem indicates to them that his cognitive faculties are being eroded along with the other users. In the movie, this is not brought up in the debriefing, and the bicycle scene remains somewhat bizarre and unexplained.
** In a scene where the characters are riding in a tow truck after their car broke down on the highway, Luckman says "If I'd known it was harmless, I would have killed it myself." In the book, the statement is explained via {{Flashback}} as an in-joke among the group about how different classes of people view the world differently.[[labelnote:More detail]]At one time they hung out with a rich girl because she'd buy them drugs they normally couldn't afford, and she hung out with them so she could [[SlummingIt pretend she was part of the drug culture]]. One day she saw a bug crawling on a wall, and asked them to come in and kill it. They explained the bug wasn't dangerous, and in fact it's useful because it eats other bugs. She responded with the aforementioned quote.[[/labelnote]] In the movie, it just sounds like an incredibly random thing to say.
* ''Film/ScottPilgrimVsTheWorld'' includes the Subspace Doors from the graphic novels, but never explains what they are, despite being used during pretty important scenes. It isn't hugely jarring though, considering all the other nonsensical video game tropes and references that are just naturally part of story.
* ''Film/{{She|1965}}'' (1965): [[{{Literature/She}} The novel]] has a complicated beginning descibing how Horace Holly gets drawn into the Vincey family quest to find a lost city in DarkestAfrica, and the months of preparation he and Leo Vincey take before setting out for Africa. The 1965 movie drops all of that and opens with Holly and Vincey, army buddies, already in Africa on unrelated business when the opportunity to search for a lost city is presented to them. As a result, it's just a convenient coincidence that Holly happens to know a lot of useful stuff about antiquity.
* When Creator/StanleyKubrick adapted ''Film/TheShining'', he did this with several plot points. Kubrick cut out the explanation of who "Tony" is, the story of the dead lady in the bathtub, and the story of the fellow in the dog costume that Horace Derwent debases--but he left all of those moments in the movie, without explanation. He also revised the story's climax, cutting out the exploding boiler, but still took care to show the boiler in a couple of scenes. It's fairly likely that the absence of explanation for most of these elements was deliberate, though, [[TropesAreTools since the lack of exposition adds to the film's mystery and ability to shock the audience.]]
* In ''Film/SpiderMan3'':
** Peter gains his infamous black symbiote but other than adapting to his costume and making him more hostile, the nature of the symbiote is not explained that much. When it comes time for Eddie Brock to put on the costume, there is no explanation given as to why he now has spider-powers and the audience is left to assume based on the comics.
** Besides the powers, the symbiote is supposed to retain the memories of the previous user. That's how Brock learns Spider-Man's secret identity and stuff like Mary Jane being important to him. Again the movie fails to establish these facts, so the climax feels even more tacked on.
** The movie also adapts the scene from the comics where Peter removes the symbiote in a church bell tower. In the comics, Peter did so because he knew from past experience about the symbiote's weakness to sonic vibrations and had no choice but to go to the tower. However, Peter doesn't figure out the symbiote's weakness until well-after he went to the bell tower - meaning he had no real reason to go there other than because of the comics. (The symbiote's weakness is clearly hinted at during this scene for viewers' benefit, but Peter doesn't put the pieces together until his final battle with Venom - which is several scenes after the fact.)
** In the film, Eddie is in the church because he is [[PrayerOfMalice praying that God will kill Peter]], which seems a ridiculously extreme reaction - yes, Peter cost him his job and wasn't exactly nice about it, but the two were competing for one position and losing your job is hardly something to kill someone over. In the comics, on the other hand, Eddie is there to seek forgiveness. Peter ''does'' cause Eddie to lose his job, but as Spider-Man rather than Peter Parker. Subsequently, in the comics Venom hates Spider-Man in his own right, rather than because he's Peter Parker.
* ''Film/StarshipTroopers'', adaptation of ''Literature/StarshipTroopers'' had the Mobile Infantry fighting battles that were ''extremely'' unsound tactically. Infantry, unsupported by armor or artillery, making direct frontal attacks on a numerically-superior enemy? HollywoodTactics at their worst. ''However'', it's also true to the book... sort of. The Mobile Infantry ''did'' operate without armor support, but only because their powered armor suits let the MI itself fill the traditional roles of [[SwissArmyWeapon armor, artillery, and even close air support (up to and including nuclear weapons.)]] When the powered armor was taken out of the movie, the justification for the MI operating unsupported went with it.
* The film adaptation of ''Literature/{{Timeline}}'' foregoes the language difficulties presented in the book. In the book, the medieval characters speak a mixture of Middle English, Old French, Occitan and Latin, with the time travelers needing earpiece translators to understand them whilst they themselves struggled to be understood. In the film, the medievals simply speak modern English and French and have no trouble understanding the time travelers.
* In ''Literature/{{Twilight}}'':
** Bella runs into some nasty characters who are going to hurt and possibly rape her. In the book, she has gotten lost by this point and does not know where to run, so prepares to scream and fight. It also says that if she tried to run, she would probably trip over her own feet. In the movie, she's still clumsy, but not ''that'' clumsy, and is still in sight of a reputable book store. Why she doesn't just turn around is not addressed.
** Also in the manga: in the book and movie, it's made pretty apparent that Edward is bothered by how Bella smells in their first biology class. In the manga, we get a few panels of him glaring pissily at her, which doesn't really indicate her smell being what's causing the issues and which leaves the panel where she sniffs her hair making her look like she has some nervous tic.
* In ''Film/VForVendetta'', Britain’s secret police are called "fingermen", which might strike some people as an odd name for a scary group of fascist enforcers. The movie never explains that the name is derived from the secret police force being collectively known as "The Finger", and there's no mention of the other government agencies following the same ThemeNaming (with the [[BigBrotherIsWatchingYou visual surveillance]] department being called "The Eye", the audio surveillance department being "The Ear", the criminal investigation force being "The Nose", and the government propaganda office being "The Mouth").
* In ''Film/VampireAcademy'', Lissa is tortured by an blind user to prevent her from using compulsion on him. However, this [[http://wlswarts.blogspot.com/2014/03/twilight-goes-to-hogwarts-for.html review]] points out that [[FridgeLogic why couldn't she heal his blindness just so she could compel him?]] This is because her hands are tied down, and her healing power only works through psychical contact such as by touch, which is out right explained in [[Literature/VampireAcademy the Book]] but only hinted at in the Movie.
* ''Film/TheWizardOfOz'':
** The 1939 film version portrays the Winged Monkeys as the unquestioningly loyal servants of the Wicked Witch of the West, but never wastes any time explaining ''how'' they came into her service (the fact that they're her {{Mooks}} is presumably enough explanation for most people). But Creator/LFrankBaum's original novel, ''Literature/TheWonderfulWizardOfOz'', specifically explained that the Monkeys were bound to obey the Witch's commands because she possessed a magical golden cap that gave her power over them. It also explained that they ''weren't'' technically her Mooks, as they were only required to obey three commands from the bearer of the golden cap; the Witch used up her last command when she had the Monkeys capture Dorothy and her friends.
** [[ColorCodedForYourConvenience The significance of various colors]] was always a central part of the Oz mythos in the books, as Oz was portrayed as a society built around the celebration of color and beauty. This is why some of the most iconic elements of the story are instantly identifiable by their color: Dorothy wears [[IconicOutfit a blue gingham dress and red ruby slippers]] [[note]] Though they were silver shoes in the book [[/note]], she travels along a yellow brick road to reach a city of green emeralds, there's a deliberate shot of a red brick road that leads in the opposite direction from the yellow brick road, and [[DeliberatelyMonochrome scenes in Oz are filmed in color while scenes in Kansas are filmed in monochrome]]. The movie retains the original book's striking use of color, but it generally doesn't explain ''why'' the various colors are significant. In the book, the Munchkins instantly trust Dorothy because she wears blue, which is the color of Munchkinland; various characters assume that Dorothy is a witch because her dress is patterned with white checks, and only sorceresses wear white; the Yellow Brick Road is yellow because it leads to Winkie Country (the land West of Munchkinland ruled by the Wicked Witch), whose color is yellow; the Red Brick Road in Munchkinland leads to Quadling Country, whose color is red; and the Emerald City is green because it's an independent capital city that lies at the center of the four regions of Oz, and thus has its own color.
** Some viewers might wonder why everyone in Oz seems to accept the Wizard as the ruler of the Emerald City so casually, since he's an outsider who wasn't even born in Oz, and there must have been someone else ruling the Emerald City before he dropped in. For that matter, his departure can cause a bit of FridgeHorror when you think about the fact that he's essentially leaving a ''power vacuum'' in the capital of Oz, with no apparent plans to appoint a successor. The novel (and its sequels) explained both points: he named the Scarecrow as his successor before he left Oz, and it was later revealed that the previous ruler of Oz was a benevolent king named Pastoria who died shortly before the Wizard arrived, while his daughter Princess Ozma mysteriously vanished soon afterward. [[note]] The TwistEnding of ''Literature/TheMarvelousLandOfOz'' reveals that Ozma had her memories erased by an evil witch named Mombi, who transformed her into a young boy named "Tip" to hide her identity. Once Tip is unmasked as Ozma and turned back, she assumes the throne in the Emerald City again.[[/note]]
* In the original novel which ''Film/WhoFramedRogerRabbit'' is based on, the book's surprise ending contains an explanation for the seemingly implausible pairing of Jessica and Roger. As the plot of the novel is completely different from the film, however, the movie's version of the Jessica/Roger relationship is simply treated as some strange, funny case of DeliberateValuesDissonance between humans and toons.
----

Top