Tropes
Media
Browse
Indexes
Forums
Videos
Join
Login
Tropes
Media
Browse
Indexes
Forums
Videos
Ask The Tropers
Trope Finder
Media Finder
Trope Launch Pad
Tech Wishlist
Reviews
Tools
Cut List
New Edits
Edit Reasons
Launches
Images List
Crowner Activity
Un-typed Pages
Recent Page Type Changes
Changelog
Tips
Creating New Redirects
Cross Wicking
Tips for Editing
Text Formatting Rules
Glossary
Edit Reasons
Handling Spoilers
Word Cruft
Administrivia
FAQ
Tropes HQ
About Us
Contact Us
Advertise
DMCA Notice
Privacy Policy
Report Bug
Go Ad-Free
Changelog
Show Spoilers
Night Vision
Sticky Header
Highlight Links
Follow TV Tropes
SugarWiki
DarthWiki
YMMV
WMG
Trivia
You need to
login
to do this.
Get Known
if you don't have an account
Markup View
Author: Bakazuki
Oct 30th 2012
at
4:45:42 PM
The original YKTTW sponsor of said trope here. The sponsor of ''this'' YKTTW went ahead and initiated on the prospect of merging without any real okay on it save for the few people above, so I felt like I need to say my piece here. I'm not exactly opposed to a merging of this into LastDisrespects, but I do have few concerns as to what this will mean for the trope should it come to fruition. By merging, would this change the scope of the trope? I created LastDisrespects with the intention of it being a funeral trope, while it has expanded from its original narrow scope of "rude/mean-spirited things people say at funerals" to "rude/mean-spirited things people say ''and do'' at funerals," contrary to my expectations, it still remained in funerals. A lot of these examples here do ''not'', though, and that's what's troubling me. I can understand the examples taking places at grave sites in lieu of funerals fitting in LastDisrespects, but the rest are related a little too tangentially for my comfort. A lot of them are people doing heinous things to person's corpse after they've successfully killed them, and that sounds like another trope altogether. But that's my opinion, anyway. I'm certainly not going to argue if you guys ''really'' feel that they should be merged together. Assuming that you guys do, I'd feel like it'd necessitate an entire rewrite of the description (rather than just a copy-and-paste of this into that). So far, what JDogindy wrote in doesn't exactly fit in well with what was there before.
Show Spoilers
Night Vision
Sticky Header
Wide Load
Important Links
Ask The Tropers
Trope Finder
Media Finder
Trope Launch Pad
Tech Wishlist
Reviews
Go Ad Free!
Crucial Browsing
Genre
Action Adventure
Comedy
Commercials
Crime & Punishment
Drama
Horror
Love
News
Professional Wrestling
Speculative Fiction
Sports Story
War
Live Blogs
Media
All Media
Animation (Western)
Anime
Comic Book
Fan Fics
Film
Game
Literature
Music And Sound Effects
New Media
Print Media
Radio
Sequential Art
Tabletop Games
Television
Theater
Videogame
Webcomics
Narrative
Universal
Applied Phlebotinum
Characterization
Characters
Characters As Device
Dialogue
Motifs
Narrative Devices
Paratext
Plots
Settings
Spectacle
Other Categories
British Telly
The Contributors
Creator Speak
Creators
Derivative Works
Language
Laws And Formulas
Show Business
Split Personality
Stock Room
Trope
Tropes
Truth And Lies
Truth In Television
Topical Tropes
Betrayal
Censorship
Combat
Death
Family
Fate And Prophecy
Food
Holiday
Memory
Money
Morality
Politics
Religion
School
Resources
Tools
Wiki Tools
Cut List
New Edits
Edit Reasons
Isolated Pages
Launches
Images List
Recent Videos
Crowner Activity
Un-typed Pages
Recent Page Type Changes
Templates
Trope Entry
Works
Character Sheet
Playing With
Fandom
Tips
Creating New Redirects
Cross Wicking
Tips for Editing
Text Formatting Rules
Glossary
Edit Reasons
Handling Spoilers
Word Cruft
Administrivia
FAQ
Changelog
Report Bug
Trope Repair Shop
Image Pickin'
Advertisement:
Top