Markup View

Author: WaterBlap

Dec 17th 2017 at 7:47:56 AM

There seems to be no reason for this to be monotheist-centric.  I realize that that was how it basically was written, but that seems to have no purpose.  There's really nothing requiring this to be Abrahamic.

Moreover, this predates monotheism by the description's own admission.

That said, "the gods" in the description should not be potholed to GreekMythology.  That mythology is not the only religion out there that's polytheistic.  Moreover, "the Lord" should not be potholed to {{God}} because other deities have that name, too, such as Freyr from Myth/NorseMythology.

I think the name being a complete sentence makes it a stock phrase, doesn't it?  I think DivineHeavens is a more concise name anyways, but the stock-phrase-ness is worth mentioning.

Also, the description seems to be "divinity EXISTS in the sky" rather than "the sky is divine," so the image seems unillustrative.  And I do have another example from mythology for "sky is divine" but not so much one for "divinity exists in the sky."