Markup View

Author: IndirectActiveTransport

Jan 19th 2014 at 7:42:02 PM

That is an audience reaction, this about an actual occurrence, regardless of how anyone reacted to it. For example, nerds such as myself love to bash the 2009 Star Trek movie, which torched the franchise something fierce, it generally got good reviews and was financially successful. I think the movie was enjoyable even, the fact that it torched the setting was not my problem with it, it was the [[LyingCreator false advertising on the part of Paramount that made me believe I would be watching something else.]]

Other nerds just hate the total disregard for actual armed service protocol the movie displays, [[HotterAndSexier some hate the younger than usual cast for Star Trek]], some hate that Kirk is getting yet another movie while Sisko never got his and that ''may'' be related to the franchise torching but does not have to be (due to the nature of the plot, it could have included any of those things we nerds thought it was lacking and still burnt the Star Trek setting as we knew it to the ground).

Notably, Sisko is from Deep Space Nine, the first ''Star Trek'' to get out without the franchise creator, so anyone who saw a problem there is automatically disqualified from saying only the creator does it right but most likely to complain about the franchise torching takeover.