Due to an incident in the past where I was very disappointed in a review that was highly praised by another troper, I said that I wouldn't judge so harshly and research more on him. Sadly that only made things worst, don't get me wrong he makes good points, but sadly he starts saying things (not always but usually when he gets carried away by his angry emotions) that shock me (and apparently other people too) like the ones I'll address now. Confused Matthew has pre-emptive hate for some movies and we all can agree on that even the fans, but he also has pre-emptive standards on some of his reviews. The movie can be successful in accomplishing what they intended, but it will be barraged because it didn't accomplish what he wanted or expected, or a character didn't do what he thinks they should had done or the develop the way he thought they should had. Reviewers have to take a lot of things into account while reviewing their movies. What was the point of the movie: so they have that in mind the whole movie; What message was it trying to deliver: so they know if the film failed and actually delivered another message, even if it was a good one it wasn't the one intended; Character Development: so they don't judge a character before said character has a chance to show what they were intended. Overall I start losing interest all interest when he goes overboard with his hatred for some movies, like if all them were the same as The Birth Ofa Nation, no offence but requirements for hating shouldn't be so low. I was interested in the scene by scene review thinking it might had been a good method except that he seems to have the memory of a goldfish. Constantly complaining about development and saying things are just thrown in when he's the one who failed to remember all the previous instances when they were implied or even said and or shown. But in the end, everyone's gotta remember this is just his opinion. His not saying it's relevant(haters) because it's not always gonna be the best(die hard fans).
Like It or Don't, But Don't Go Overboard.
Due to an incident in the past where I was very disappointed in a review that was highly praised by another troper, I said that I wouldn't judge so harshly and research more on him. Sadly that only made things worst, don't get me wrong he makes good points, but sadly he starts saying things (not always but usually when he gets carried away by his angry emotions) that shock me (and apparently other people too) like the ones I'll address now. Confused Matthew has pre-emptive hate for some movies and we all can agree on that even the fans, but he also has pre-emptive standards on some of his reviews. The movie can be successful in accomplishing what they intended, but it will be barraged because it didn't accomplish what he wanted or expected, or a character didn't do what he thinks they should had done or the develop the way he thought they should had. Reviewers have to take a lot of things into account while reviewing their movies. What was the point of the movie: so they have that in mind the whole movie; What message was it trying to deliver: so they know if the film failed and actually delivered another message, even if it was a good one it wasn't the one intended; Character Development: so they don't judge a character before said character has a chance to show what they were intended. Overall I start losing interest all interest when he goes overboard with his hatred for some movies, like if all them were the same as The Birth Ofa Nation, no offence but requirements for hating shouldn't be so low. I was interested in the scene by scene review thinking it might had been a good method except that he seems to have the memory of a goldfish. Constantly complaining about development and saying things are just thrown in when he's the one who failed to remember all the previous instances when they were implied or even said and or shown. But in the end, everyone's gotta remember this is just his opinion. His not saying it's relevant(haters) because it's not always gonna be the best(die hard fans).