Follow TV Tropes

Reviews Film / Alice In Wonderland 2010

Go To

Welshbie Since: Sep, 2013
02/05/2017 17:33:09 •••

Underland is superior to Wonderland

Tim Burton did it. He managed to suck the life, the soul, the essence out of Charles Lutwidge Dodgson/Lewis Carroll's Alice in Wonderland's fantasy world.

That's... actually an amazing accomplishment when you think about it.

I couldn't do it, I know that. Not even with a budget of $150–$200 million. No way.

Its not easy to force a war-story, prophecy, and chosen-one cliches, onto a colorful literary work where they don't belong. And congratulations are in order for making Care Bears in Wonderland appear 'sincere' and 'faithful' to the original and hugely-influential novel, by comparison. That takes some doing.

Everyone expected he'd achieve something fitting and memorable with the world, like filling it with luscious and elaborate backgrounds as seen in American Mc Gee's Alice. He didn't and I'm impressed. Apparently, not being original, is the new original.

Its not everyday you can turn an upside-world populated by peculiar and amazing anthropomorphic creatures and make them dull and lackluster.

Also worth mentioning is in spite of Tim's sheer determination to not stick to the source material whatsoever in the name of "art", and risk angering lovers of the book and earlier adaptations, the film grossed over a billion in ticket sales anyway... that's amazing...

...I think the audience deserves its own applause.

Tuckerscreator (4 Score & 7 Years Ago)
03/19/2014 00:00:00

And congratulations are in order for making Care Bears in Wonderland appear 'sincere' and 'faithful' to the original and hugely-influential novel, by comparison.

This sounds suspiciously similar to the Nostalgia Critic's own claim in his recent review...

emeriin Since: Jan, 2001
03/19/2014 00:00:00

And at least he had "Tim Burton" give him a moral, even if he did forget it right after.

Welshbie Since: Sep, 2013
03/19/2014 00:00:00

If we want to be technical, Care Bears in Wonderland, is still the worst adaptation, because Tim Burton's production seems to be ashamed to have any association to Lewis Carroll's work. Even in name. It rejects the "wonder" in Wonderland and instead we got... under-land. Underland? Seriously? That's ripping off Narnia isn't it?

Writing reviews that the moderators don't want you to see.
Tuckerscreator (4 Score & 7 Years Ago)
03/19/2014 00:00:00

The sixth Narnia book does indeed have Underland, though that's as far as the similarity goes (it's populated by gnomes, for one).

FullBlast Since: Sep, 2013
03/24/2014 00:00:00

I'm probably one of the few people who will say this, but I do like the movie. To clarify, I think it needs quite a bit of improvement, but for the overall meh-ness I like it (rather the potential it had to be a decent movie anyway)

I love being irrefutable
DorianCairne Since: Jan, 2015
01/14/2015 00:00:00

Thank you for this. I came here ready to rage and laughed instead.

catmuto Since: Nov, 2012
03/04/2015 00:00:00

I find Burton's depiction of Alice as a very boring girl to be very fitting to the book. I read the book and, dang, was that girl boring. So at least he got that right.

TheRealYuma Since: Feb, 2014
02/04/2017 00:00:00

This is less of a review and more of an applause. Also, if anything, Tim Burton should have just used the original screenplay for the cartoon as inspiration.

LitleWiggle Since: Feb, 2013
02/05/2017 00:00:00

^

Pretty sure this review is supposed to be sarcastic...

TheRealYuma Since: Feb, 2014
02/05/2017 00:00:00

Either way, it hardly qualifies as a review.


Leave a Comment:

Top