Yeah, I agree that Claude indicating that in his view his goals for Fodlan would be more convenient to achieve if Rhea were dead is a lot less extreme than him outright seeking her death. Plus as I recall in the same conversation he states he does hope she is alive at least in the sense that he has a lot of questions he wants to ask her.
As for how best to incorporate this without ballooning the entry, that may require some more thought.
Ferdinand Von Aegir fan
I purpose we make a Gamebreaker page in advance since I can see it getting out of hand quickly.
Muramasa got. Hide / Show Replies
Likewise, should we migrate the Memetic Mutation section to the general Three Houses page and put a redirect in its place?
Edited by AlleyOop
I think that works. Helps keep the page more organized.
Muramasa got.
How sweet it is
Is the "Karen" comment necessary in regards to Ingrid's hairstyle? From what I know, the slang term has very toxic connotations, and one that I feel cannot be handled lightly. So far I just upgraded the pothole to a standalone wick for clarity.
she/her | TRS needs your help! | Contributor of Trope Report
Regarding the fact that "Proponents of Golden Wildfire argue that Claude wanting to kill Rhea makes sense because he wants Rhea dead even in the post-academy 3H timeline because his support goes up if Byleth asks if he hope she's dead," I've often seen the counter-argument that Claude "would like the state of Fodlan if she was dead" isn't QUITE equivalent to Golden Wildfire's "And I must kill her at all costs myself" portrayal: I don't want to clog the Broken Base entry for Golden Wildfire any further than it already is, so I won't make any edits now, but I'm wondering if there's a way to include this counterargument without ballooning the entry any more, since it IS a common response I see to the above argument.
Hide / Show Replies