SeptimusHeap
MOD
(Edited uphill both ways)
Sep 29th 2014 at 11:39:31 PM
•••
Also, that looks like a Zero-Context Example to me.
"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman
Oddstar
Since: Jun, 2014
Oct 5th 2014 at 12:50:37 AM
•••
I agree. Issandrian isn't evil at all, and I wouldn't call Dawson evil either. He's certainly a reactionary, but he's not out to hurt anyone. He just doesn't want Antea to change.
Moved this to Discussion:
Although the second bullet is natter, it makes a good point. I wouldn't say that Issandrian is evil at all- he's antagonistic to Dawson, but he's actually the more sympathetic of the two and while his fellow conspirators had some shady aims, Issandrian was an Unwitting Pawn.
Dawson is a harder call, but he doesn't really seem to quite fit Affably Evil (at least not for the reasons in the example). Dawson is well-intentioned and a loving father and husband, but has some pretty repellent beliefs and does some bad stuff because of those beliefs (although he also does noble stuff).
Edit, edit, edit, edit the wiki Hide / Show Replies