10:38:19 PM Jun 16th 2011
Does anyone else find it ridiculous when a Barbie doll (or any similar doll) has those molded-on/painted-on panties? I mean, the dolls typically lack nipples and genitalia anyway. Permanent undergarments just seems redundant. Also, Moral Guardians from either side of the spectrum are gonna find things to bitch about regarding the doll no matter what.
05:40:15 AM Jun 17th 2011
Do you know what I hate more? Is that neither Ken dolls, nor G.I. Joes get painted on permanent underwear! They both just go commando, constantly. That's gender inequality!! I demand equal underwear placement on all of America's favorite dolls. Also, why does Barbie have no bra? I mean, if your going to have panties....
08:32:28 PM Jun 17th 2011
Actually, there are a few male dolls that have underwear. I'm not sure if any of them are Ken dolls though. But I agree, it doesn't happen nearly enough.
07:52:51 AM Feb 4th 2011
Who else thinks the page image should represent current playline (mainline) Barbie and not Holiday Nikki?
11:46:46 AM Feb 4th 2011
Um, there are loads of possible pictures. Perhaps a collage might be best. I'll see what I can do later.