Does anyone else find it ridiculous when a Barbie doll (or any similar doll) has those molded-on/painted-on panties? I mean, the dolls typically lack nipples and genitalia anyway. Permanent undergarments just seems redundant. Also, Moral Guardians from either side of the spectrum are gonna find things to bitch about regarding the doll no matter what.
Hide / Show RepliesDo you know what I hate more? Is that neither Ken dolls, nor G.I. Joes get painted on permanent underwear! They both just go commando, constantly. That's gender inequality!! I demand equal underwear placement on all of America's favorite dolls. Also, why does Barbie have no bra? I mean, if your going to have panties....
Actually, there are a few male dolls that have underwear. I'm not sure if any of them are Ken dolls though. But I agree, it doesn't happen nearly enough.
All of my Ken dolls have molded underwear, I have no idea what you are talking about.
Who else thinks the page image should represent current playline (mainline) Barbie and not Holiday Nikki?
Infinity... Hide / Show RepliesUm, there are loads of possible pictures. Perhaps a collage might be best. I'll see what I can do later.
I'm on the internet. My arguments are invalid.A collage would be best, since the current tagline is 'B who you wanna B'.
Infinity...
Should this be put in the franchise namespace?