[004]
71.120.130.209
Current Version
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
Plus Kyurem is a generation V pokemon. This page is about pokemon who were introduced in Generation IV.
to:
Plus Kyurem is a generation V pokemon. This page is about pokemon who were introduced in Generation IV.
I\\\'d argue losing speed can be a drawback though depending on what you\\\'re up against, because being able to attack first can give you a huge advantage sometimes.
I\\\'d argue losing speed can be a drawback though depending on what you\\\'re up against, because being able to attack first can give you a huge advantage sometimes.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
It\'s unnecessary to compare Kyurem and Garchomp on this entry because it\'s not relevant at all to how Garchomp loses speed stats for more power when he transforms into his mega form. It comes off as the writer of the example going on a tangent. Casual wiki readers just aren\'t going to get it, and they won\'t care.
to:
Assuming Garchomp counts for this entry it\\\'s unnecessary to compare Kyurem and Garchomp because it\\\'s not relevant at all to how Garchomp loses speed stats for more power when he transforms into his mega form. It comes off as the writer of the example going on a tangent. Casual wiki readers just aren\\\'t going to get it, and they won\\\'t care.
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
Plus Kyurem is a generation V pokemon. This page is about Generation IV.
to:
Plus Kyurem is a generation V pokemon. This page is about pokemon who were introduced in Generation IV.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
It\'s unnecessary to compare Kyurem and Garchomp on this entry because it\'s not relevant at all to how Garchomp loses speed stats for more power when he transforms into his mega form. It comes off as the writer of the example going on a tangent. Casual wiki readers just aren\'t going to get it or care.
to:
It\\\'s unnecessary to compare Kyurem and Garchomp on this entry because it\\\'s not relevant at all to how Garchomp loses speed stats for more power when he transforms into his mega form. It comes off as the writer of the example going on a tangent. Casual wiki readers just aren\\\'t going to get it, and they won\\\'t care.
