[002]
72.14.178.184
Current Version
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
I\'m not sure if the example under \'Advertising\' about moisturising soap really fits. The rest of the page seems to be about intentional flawed logic and the moisturising soap example doesn\'t give enough context to tell if it was intentional or not.
to:
I\\\'m not sure if the example under \\\'Advertising\\\' about moisturising soap really fits. The rest of the page seems to be about intentional flawed logic and the moisturising soap example doesn\\\'t give enough context to tell if it was intentional or not.
EDIT: Chick Tracts have a similar problem, as they don\\\'t seem to be a parody.
EDIT: Chick Tracts have a similar problem, as they don\\\'t seem to be a parody.
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
While religion can be touchy, there\'s an easy way to get around it with this guy: make absolutely sure that
it\'s portrayed as his fucked-up version of Christianity. I would add things to his portfolio such as ArtisticLicenseReligion, SadlyMythtaken, and WordOfDante.
it\'s portrayed as his fucked-up version of Christianity. I would add things to his portfolio such as ArtisticLicenseReligion, SadlyMythtaken, and WordOfDante.
to:
While religion can be touchy, there\\\'s an easy way to get around it with this guy: make it absolutely clear that it\\\'s HIS fucked-up version of Christianity. I would add things to his portfolio such as ArtisticLicenseReligion, SadlyMythtaken, and WordOfDante.
