[005]
70.160.75.238
Current Version
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
Lord Ruthven was a daywalker but he drank blood, was an undead nobleman, and had seductive powers. Cornerstone of cliche vampires... minus daywalking. Though the original Dracula was a daywalker too: he just wasn\'t uber powerful in sunlight. It\'s a misconception he turned to ash from it (or rather a later change by fans).
Is there gonna be an objection if I change it?
Is there gonna be an objection if I change it?
to:
Lord Ruthven was a daywalker but he drank blood, was an undead nobleman, and had seductive powers. Cornerstone of cliche vampires... minus daywalking. Though the original Dracula was a daywalker too: he just wasn\\\'t uber powerful in sunlight. It\\\'s a misconception he turned to ash from it (or rather a later change by fans).
Changed line(s) 1 from:
n
This is just out of curiosity: Why is VarneyTheVampire listed as the trope maker? TheVampyre was an earlier work and bestseller during 1819. It\'s public domain for anyone to read: http://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/6087
to:
Why is VarneyTheVampire listed as the trope maker? TheVampyre was an earlier work and bestseller during 1819. It\\\'s public domain for anyone to read: http://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/6087
Changed line(s) 3 from:
n
Lord Ruthven was a daywalker but he drank blood, was an undead nobleman, and had seductive powers. Cornerstone of cliche vampires... minus daywalking. Though the original Dracula was a daywalker too: he just wasn\'t uber powerful in sunlight. It\'s a misconception he turned to ash from it.
to:
Lord Ruthven was a daywalker but he drank blood, was an undead nobleman, and had seductive powers. Cornerstone of cliche vampires... minus daywalking. Though the original Dracula was a daywalker too: he just wasn\\\'t uber powerful in sunlight. It\\\'s a misconception he turned to ash from it (or rather a later change by fans).
Is there gonna be an objection if I change it?
Is there gonna be an objection if I change it?
